Case 3:18-cv L Document 6-5 Filed 07/03/18 Page 1 of 9 PageID 97 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION

Similar documents
Case 1:11-cv RJS Document 267 Filed 02/08/17 Page 1 of 11

Case 1:14-cv CRC Document 222 Filed 10/03/18 Page 1 of 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA.

Case: 1:12-cv CAB Doc #: 4 Filed: 07/31/12 1 of 8. PageID #: 84 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO.

Case 1:18-cv ER Document 71 Filed 12/27/18 Page 1 of 13

Case 1:03-cv LJM-TAB Document 745 Filed 05/22/07 Page 1 of 8 PageID #: 8174

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION

Case 1:18-cv AJN Document 6 Filed 09/29/18 Page 1 of 2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION

Securities and Exchange Commission v. Ingles Markets, Inc. Doc. 6 Case 1:06-cv LHT-DLH Document 6 Filed 04/28/2006 Page 1 of 8

Case 1:15-cv JMS-MJD Document 177 Filed 06/30/17 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 891

Case 1:12-cv Document 2-1 Filed 12/20/12 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA. Plaintiff, Defendant.

Case 1:05-cv MSK -CBS Document 843 Filed 01/21/11 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 7

Case 2:15-cv GMN-PAL Document 62 Filed 06/16/16 Page 1 of 6

USDCSDNY DOCUMENT ELECTRONICALLY FILED DOC#:,---.- DATE FILED: 1 / j {2.~> is

Case 3:16-cv EMC Document 311 Filed 02/12/18 Page 1 of 7

Case 3:17-cv VAB Document 11 Filed 04/18/17 Page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT

Case 1:08-cv RJL Document 3 Filed 12/15/2008 Page 1 of 38

Case 1:18-cv ER Document 72 Filed 12/27/18 Page 1 of 12

Case 1:10-cv RJL Document 3-1 Filed 03/22/10 Page 1 of 12 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA. Plaintiff, Civil Action No. CONSENT OF DEFENDANT SIEMENS AKTIENGESELLSCHAFT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

: SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION, : : 01 Civ (BSJ) Plaintiff, : : : v. : PARTIAL FINAL : JUDGMENT AND

Case 3:18-cv M Document 62 Filed 03/09/18 Page 1 of 10 PageID 1084

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Before the SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Case 2:09-cv JP Document Filed 11/29/10 Page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Case 4:12-cv Document 209 Filed in TXSD on 07/02/14 Page 1 of 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Case 1:14-cv CRC Document 238 Filed 03/08/19 Page 1 of 11

Case 4:17-cv ALM Document 26 Filed 06/02/17 Page 1 of 3 PageID #: 543

Case 4:15-cv DLH-CSM Document 5 Filed 05/05/15 Page 1 of 11

Case 3:09-cv N Document 5 Filed 02/17/2009 Page 1 of 7 ORIGINAL

Case 1:15-cv BAH Document 1 Filed 03/03/15 Page 1 of 19 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Case: 1:17-cv Document #: 8-1 Filed: 09/06/17 Page 397 of 420 PageID #:481

Case 1:18-cv TNM Document 14 Filed 03/04/19 Page 1 of 20

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO

EBERHARD SCHONEBURG, ) SECURITIES LAWS

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 11/04/ :59 PM INDEX NO /2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 58 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 11/04/2016 EXHIBIT 8

Case 1:19-cv Document 3 Filed 01/16/19 Page 1 of 16 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. Case No.

Case 3:09-cv N Document Filed 09/07/16 Page 50 of 138 PageID 67685

Case 3:09-cv N Document 8 Filed 02/17/2009 Page 1 of 10 U.S. DISTRICT COURT :NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS FILED ---'-----,

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY. No.

Case 4:18-cv HSG Document 1 Filed 03/16/18 Page 1 of 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

STIPULATED FINAL JUDGMENT AND ORDER FOR PERMANENT INJUNCTION, CIVIL MONEY PENALTIES, AND OTHER RELIEF

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. Plaintiff, I COMPLAINT FOR VIOLATION OF THE FEDERAL SECURITIES LAWS.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. Case No. 2:17-cv-4720

Case 3:11-cv JBA Document 200 Filed 05/13/11 Page 1 of 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT

Case 1:19-cv DLC Document 1 Filed 01/03/19 Page 1 of 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Case 2:16-cv JAR-JPO Document 69 Filed 09/20/17 Page 1 of 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF KANSAS

C V CLASS ACTION

muia'aiena ED) wnrn 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. Case No.: Plaintiff, Defendants

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. CASE No.: COMPLAINT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE. Case No.:

Case 3:16-cv Document 1 Filed 11/11/16 Page 1 of 16 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. Case No. Plaintiff, Defendants

Case bjh11 Doc 957 Filed 04/16/19 Entered 04/16/19 14:24:44 Page 1 of 12

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ALAN GRABISCH, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, Plaintiff,

Case 1:18-cv RWZ Document 53-1 Filed 04/05/18 Page 1 of 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS

Case 5:10-cv FB Document 25 Filed 03/11/11 Page 1 of 7

Case Number: CIV-MARTINEZ-GOODMAN DEFAULT FINAL JUDGMENT AS TO DEFENDANTS YOUR YELLOW PAGES. INC., CITY PAGES. INC..

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF COLORADO ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. Plaintiff, Defendants. CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT

$201,450,000 CONTRA COSTA TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY SALES TAX REVENUE BONDS (LIMITED TAX REFUNDING BONDS) SERIES 2012A BOND PURCHASE AGREEMENT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA : : : : : : : : : : : : : :

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. Plaintiff, DRAFT. Defendants. CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT

FORWARD DELIVERY BOND PURCHASE CONTRACT, Utility System Refunding Revenue Bonds, Series 2015

The Board of Trustees of the University of Illinois. University of Illinois Auxiliary Facilities System Refunding Revenue Bonds, Series 2011C

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. Plaintiff, DRAFT. Defendants. CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT

Case 4:13-cv YGR Document 126 Filed 09/07/16 Page 1 of 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ROYAL BANK OF CANADA SECOND AMENDED AND RESTATED UNDERWRITING AGREEMENT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. Plaintiff, DRAFT. Defendants.

AGREED MOTION FOR ENTRY OF CONSENT JUDGMENT AND PERMANENT INJUNCTION

$ GROVER BEACH IMPROVEMENT AGENCY INDUSTRIAL ENHANCEMENT PROJECT AREA TAX ALLOCATION BONDS SERIES 2011B PURCHASE CONTRACT, 2011

Case 3:17-cv G Document 1 Filed 09/11/17 Page 1 of 13 PageID 1

- 1 - Class Action Complaint for Violation of the Federal Securities Laws

v. JURY TRIAL DEMANDED

Case 4:17-cv Document 1 Filed in TXSD on 05/03/17 Page 1 of 19 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION

Case: 3:14-cv wmc Document #: 404 Filed: 06/21/17 Page 1 of 15

Case 2:17-cv CCC-JBC Document 1 Filed 11/29/17 Page 1 of 15 PageID: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

15 USC 80b-3. NB: This unofficial compilation of the U.S. Code is current as of Jan. 4, 2012 (see

REMARKETING AGREEMENT

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE THIRTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, FOR HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY, FLORIDA CIVIL DIVISION

Case 3:11-cv K Document 72 Filed 06/25/12 Page 1 of 5 PageID 676

Case 1:14-cv PGG Document 2 Filed 04/23/14 Page 1 of 18 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

[~DJ FINAL JUDGMENT AND ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE

Case 1:15-cv MGC Document 104 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/01/2016 Page 1 of 20 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. ) ) ) Case No. ) ) ) ) CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT ) ) ) JURY TRIAL DEMANDED ) ) ) ) Plaintiff,

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION NON-PROSECUTION AGREEMENT

Case 2:10-cv PA -PJW Document 1 Filed 08/17/10 Page 1 of 26 Page ID #:10

$ CITY OF ALBANY (Alameda County, California) 2016 General Obligation Refunding Bonds BOND PURCHASE AGREEMENT

NC General Statutes - Chapter 1A Article 8 1

BOND PURCHASE CONTRACT

Case 1:16-cv WHP Document 4-1 Filed 08/18/16 Page 1 of 10 NO. 1:16-CV-6544

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. Plaintiff, DRAFT. Defendants.

FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS BOND PURCHASE AGREEMENT, 2014

Case 3:14-cv PGS-LHG Document 130 Filed 05/14/18 Page 1 of 9 PageID: 4283

~~_,_ ~~-~ni~i#j~rj I

Transcription:

Case 3:18-cv-01735-L Document 6-5 Filed 07/03/18 Page 1 of 9 PageID 97 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION, v. Plaintiff, C.A. No. UNITED DEVELOPMENT FUNDING III, LP, UNITED DEVELOPMENT FUNDING IV, HOLLIS M. GREENLAW, BENJAMIN L. WISSINK, THEODORE F. ETTER, CARA D. OBERT, and DAVID A. HANSON Defendants. FINAL JUDGMENT AS TO DEFENDANTS HOLLIS M. GREENLAW, BENJAMIN L. WISSINK, THEODORE F. ETTER, AND CARA D. OBERT The Securities and Exchange Commission (the Commission ) having filed a Complaint and Defendants Hollis M. Greenlaw ( Greenlaw ), Benjamin L. Wissink ( Wissink ), Theodore F. Etter ( Etter ), and Cara D. Obert ( Obert ) (collectively, Defendants ) having each entered a general appearance; consented to the Court s jurisdiction over Defendants and the subject matter of this action; consented to entry of this Final Judgment without admitting or denying the allegations of the Complaint (except as to jurisdiction and except as otherwise provided herein in paragraph VIII); waived findings of fact and conclusions of law; and waived any right to appeal from this Final Judgment:

Case 3:18-cv-01735-L Document 6-5 Filed 07/03/18 Page 2 of 9 PageID 98 I. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that Defendants Greenlaw, Wissink, Etter, and Obert are permanently restrained and enjoined from violating Sections 17(a)(2) and 17(a)(3) of the Securities Act of 1933 (the Securities Act ) [15 U.S.C. 77q(a)(2) and (a)(3)] in the offer or sale of any security by the use of any means or instruments of transportation or communication in interstate commerce or by use of the mails, directly or indirectly: (i) to obtain money or property by means of any untrue statement of a material fact or any omission of a material fact necessary in order to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which they were made, not misleading; or (ii) to engage in any transaction, practice, or course of business which operates or would operate as a fraud or deceit upon the purchaser. Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 65(d)(2), the foregoing paragraph also binds the following who receive actual notice of this Final Judgment by personal service or otherwise: (a) Defendants officers, agents, servants, employees, and attorneys; and (b) other persons in active concert or participation with Defendants or with anyone described in (a). II. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that Defendants Greenlaw, Wissink, Etter, and Obert are permanently restrained and enjoined from aiding and abetting any violation of Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act [15 U.S.C. 78m(a)] by knowingly or recklessly providing substantial assistance to an issuer that files with the Commission any periodic report pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act [15 U.S.C. 78m(a)] that contains any untrue statement of material fact, or which omits to state a material fact necessary in order to 2

Case 3:18-cv-01735-L Document 6-5 Filed 07/03/18 Page 3 of 9 PageID 99 make the statements made, in the light of the circumstances under which they were made, not misleading, or which fails to comply in any material respect with the requirements of Section 13(a) [15 U.S.C. 78m(a)] or Rules 12b-20, 13a-1, or 13a-13 promulgated thereunder [17 C.F.R. 240.12b-20, 240.13a-1, and 240.13a-13]. Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 65(d)(2), the foregoing paragraphs also bind the following who receive actual notice of this Final Judgment by personal service or otherwise: (a) Defendants officers, agents, servants, employees, and attorneys; and (b) other persons in active concert or participation with Defendants or with anyone described in (a). III. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that Defendants Greenlaw, Wissink, Etter, and Obert are permanently restrained and enjoined from aiding or abetting any violation of Section 13(b)(2)(A) of the Exchange Act [15 U.S.C. 78m(b)(2)(A)] by knowingly or recklessly providing substantial assistance to an issuer that fails to make and keep books, records, and accounts, which, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the issuer. Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 65(d)(2), the foregoing paragraphs also bind the following who receive actual notice of this Final Judgment by personal service or otherwise: (a) Defendants officers, agents, servants, employees, and attorneys; and (b) other persons in active concert or participation with Defendants or with anyone described in (a). 3

Case 3:18-cv-01735-L Document 6-5 Filed 07/03/18 Page 4 of 9 PageID 100 IV. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that Defendants Greenlaw, Wissink, Etter, and Obert are permanently restrained and enjoined from aiding or abetting any violation of Section 13(b)(2)(B) of the Exchange Act [15 U.S.C. 78m(b)(2)(B)] by knowingly or recklessly providing substantial assistance to an issuer that fails to devise and maintain a system of internal accounting controls sufficient to provide reasonable assurances that: (a) transactions are executed in accordance with management s general or specific authorization; (b) transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles or any other criteria applicable to such statements, and to maintain accountability for assets; (c) access to assets is permitted only in accordance with management s general or specific authorization; and (d) the recorded accountability for assets is compared with the existing assets at reasonable intervals and appropriate action is taken with respect to any differences. Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 65(d)(2), the foregoing paragraphs also bind the following who receive actual notice of this Final Judgment by personal service or otherwise: (a) Defendants officers, agents, servants, employees, and attorneys; and (b) other persons in active concert or participation with Defendants or with anyone described in (a). V. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that Defendants Greenlaw and Obert are permanently restrained and enjoined from violating Rule 13a-14 of the Exchange Act [17 C.F.R. 13a-14] by signing a certification of a Form 10-K or 10-Q filed with the Commission falsely confirming that the Form 10-K or 10-Q does not contain any untrue 4

Case 3:18-cv-01735-L Document 6-5 Filed 07/03/18 Page 5 of 9 PageID 101 statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading. Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 65(d)(2), the foregoing paragraph also binds the following who receive actual notice of this Final Judgment by personal service or otherwise: (a) Defendants Greenlaw s and Obert s officers, agents, servants, employees, and attorneys; and (b) other persons in active concert or participation with Defendants Greenlaw or Obert or with anyone described in (a). VI. IT IS HEREBY FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that: Defendants Greenlaw, Wissink, Etter, and Obert are jointly and severally liable for disgorgement of $6,809,282, representing profits gained as a result of the conduct alleged in the Complaint, together with prejudgment interest thereon in the amount of $390,718. Defendant Greenlaw is liable for a civil penalty in the amount of $250,000 pursuant to Section 20(d) of the Securities Act [15 U.S.C. 77t(d)] and Section 21(d)(3) of the Exchange Act [15 U.S.C. 78u(d)(3)]. Defendant Wissink is liable for a civil penalty in the amount of $250,000 pursuant to Section 20(d) of the Securities Act [15 U.S.C. 77t(d)] and Section 21(d)(3) of the Exchange Act [15 U.S.C. 78u(d)(3)]. Defendant Etter is liable for a civil penalty in the amount of $250,000 pursuant to Section 20(d) of the Securities Act [15 U.S.C. 77t(d)] and Section 21(d)(3) of the Exchange Act [15 U.S.C. 78u(d)(3)]. Defendant Obert is liable for a civil penalty in the amount of $250,000 pursuant to 5

Case 3:18-cv-01735-L Document 6-5 Filed 07/03/18 Page 6 of 9 PageID 102 Section 20(d) of the Securities Act [15 U.S.C. 77t(d)] and Section 21(d)(3) of the Exchange Act [15 U.S.C. 78u(d)(3)].. Defendants shall satisfy these obligations by paying the amounts stated above to the Securities and Exchange Commission within 180 days after entry of this Final Judgment. Defendants may transmit payment electronically to the Commission, which will provide detailed ACH transfer/fedwire instructions upon request. Payment may also be made directly from a bank account via Pay.gov through the SEC website at http://www.sec.gov/about/offices/ofm.htm. Defendants may also pay by certified check, bank cashier s check, or United States postal money order payable to the Securities and Exchange Commission, which shall be delivered or mailed to Enterprise Services Center Accounts Receivable Branch 6500 South MacArthur Boulevard Oklahoma City, OK 73169 and shall be accompanied by a letter identifying the case title, civil action number, and name of this Court; the name of the Defendant making payment; and specifying that payment is made pursuant to this Final Judgment. Defendants shall simultaneously transmit photocopies of evidence of payment and case identifying information to the Commission s counsel in this action. By making the payment, Defendants relinquish all legal and equitable right, title, and interest in such funds and no part of the funds shall be returned to Defendants. The Commission may enforce the Court s judgment for disgorgement and prejudgment interest by moving for civil contempt (and/or through other collection procedures authorized by law) at any time after 180 days following entry of this Final Judgment. Defendants shall pay 6

Case 3:18-cv-01735-L Document 6-5 Filed 07/03/18 Page 7 of 9 PageID 103 post judgment interest on any delinquent amounts pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1961. The Commission shall hold the funds, together with any interest and income earned thereon (collectively, the Fund ), pending further order of the Court. The Commission may propose a plan to distribute the Fund subject to the Court s approval. Such a plan may provide that the Fund shall be distributed pursuant to the Fair Fund provisions of Section 308(a) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. The Court shall retain jurisdiction over the administration of any distribution of the Fund. If the Commission staff determines that the Fund will not be distributed, the Commission shall send the funds paid pursuant to this Final Judgment to the United States Treasury. Regardless of whether any such Fair Fund distribution is made, amounts ordered to be paid as civil penalties pursuant to this Final Judgment shall be treated as penalties paid to the government for all purposes, including all tax purposes. To preserve the deterrent effect of the civil penalty, Defendants shall not, after offset or reduction of any award of compensatory damages in any Related Investor Action based on a Defendant s payment of disgorgement in this action, argue that a Defendant is entitled to, nor shall a Defendant further benefit by, offset or reduction of such compensatory damages award by the amount of any part of a Defendant s payment of a civil penalty in this action ( Penalty Offset ). If the court in any Related Investor Action grants such a Penalty Offset, the Defendant receiving the benefit of the offset shall, within 30 days after entry of a final order granting the Penalty Offset, notify the Commission s counsel in this action and pay the amount of the Penalty Offset to the United States Treasury or to a Fair Fund, as the Commission directs. Such a payment shall not be deemed an additional civil penalty and shall not be deemed to change the amount of the civil penalty imposed in this Final Judgment. For purposes of this paragraph, a Related Investor Action means a private 7

Case 3:18-cv-01735-L Document 6-5 Filed 07/03/18 Page 8 of 9 PageID 104 damages action brought against a Defendant by or on behalf of one or more investors based on substantially the same facts as alleged in the Complaint in this action. VII. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that Defendants Consents are incorporated herein with the same force and effect as if fully set forth herein, and that Defendants shall comply with all of the undertakings and agreements set forth therein. VIII. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that, solely for purposes of exceptions to discharge set forth in Section 523 of the Bankruptcy Code, 11 U.S.C. 523, the allegations in the complaint are true and admitted by Defendants Greenlaw, Wissink, Etter, and Obert, and further, any debt for disgorgement, prejudgment interest, civil penalty or other amounts due by Defendants Greenlaw, Wissink, Etter, or Obert under this Final Judgment or any other judgment, order, consent order, decree or settlement agreement entered in connection with this proceeding, is a debt for the violation by Defendants of the federal securities laws or any regulation or order issued under such laws, as set forth in Section 523(a)(19) of the Bankruptcy Code, 11 U.S.C. 523(a)(19). IX. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that this Court shall retain jurisdiction of this matter for the purposes of enforcing the terms of this Final Judgment. 8

Case 3:18-cv-01735-L Document 6-5 Filed 07/03/18 Page 9 of 9 PageID 105 X. There being no just reason for delay, pursuant to Rule 54(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the Clerk is ordered to enter this Final Judgment forthwith and without further notice. So Ordered and signed, this day of 2018. UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 9