UNITED STATES OF AMERICA BEFORE THE FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION ) ) ) ) )

Similar documents
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA BEFORE THE FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION. ) Southern California Edison Company ) Docket No.

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA BEFORE THE FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION ) ) )

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA BEFORE THE FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION ) ) ) ) ) )

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA BEFORE THE FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION ) ) ) ) ) )

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA BEFORE THE FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION ) ) ) )

June 2, The documents submitted with this filing consist of this letter of transmittal, and all attachments thereto.

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA BEFORE THE FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION. Southern California Edison Company ) Docket No.

March 22, The documents submitted with this filing consist of this letter of transmittal, and all attachments thereto.

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA BEFORE THE FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA BEFORE THE FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION. Berry Petroleum Company ) Docket No. ER _

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA BEFORE THE FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION ) )

November 29, Ms. Kimberly D. Bose, Secretary Federal Energy Regulatory Commission 888 First Street, N.E. Washington, DC Dear Ms.

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

April 3, Ms. Kimberly D. Bose, Secretary Federal Energy Regulatory Commission 888 First Street, N.E. Washington, DC Dear Ms.

October 4, 2005 RE: APPLICATION /INVESTIGATION

BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY S (U 338-E) ANSWER TO COMPLAINT

Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA BEFORE THE FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION

BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY S (U 338-E) PREHEARING CONFERENCE STATEMENT

BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA BEFORE THE FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION

REPLY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY (U 338-E) TO PROTEST OF DIVISION OF RATEPAYER ADVOCATES

July 22, 1999 PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA ENERGY DIVISION

BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY S (U 338-E) ANSWER TO COMPLAINT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA BEFORE THE FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION

October 21, 2005 RE: APPLICATION /INVESTIGATION

BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ) ) ) )

BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

January 25, 2002 PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA ENERGY DIVISION

Southern California Edison Revised Cal. PUC Sheet No E Rosemead, California (U 338-E) Cancelling Revised Cal. PUC Sheet No.

September 8, 2004 PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA ENERGY DIVISION. Format for Customer Generation Quarterly Report

Southern California Edison Original Cal. PUC Sheet No E Rosemead, California (U 338-E) Cancelling Cal. PUC Sheet No.

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA BEFORE THE FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION

BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY S (U 338-E) MOTION FOR PARTY STATUS

May 16, 2006 ADVICE 2002-E (U 338-E) PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA ENERGY DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA BEFORE THE FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION

Arizona Public Service Company, Docket No. ER , Agency Agreement

A. Zonal Agreements and Termination of the GFA

New England Participating Transmission Owner (PTO) Procedure for Disclosure of Critical Energy Infrastructure Information (CEII)

BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY S (U 338-E) ANSWER TO COMPLAINT

September 28, 2000 PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA ENERGY DIVISION

March 28, Federal Energy Regulatory Commission 888 First Street, N.E. Washington, D.C Philis J. Posey, Acting Secretary

Order No. 587-Y Compliance Filing, Colorado Interstate Gas Company, L.L.C.; Docket No. RP19-

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA BEFORE THE FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION MOTION FOR ISSUANCE OF A PROTECTIVE ORDER

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION ORDER ADOPTING PROTECTIVE ORDER. (Issued January 23, 2012)

April 16, Docket No. ER

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA BEFORE THE FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION

September 3, 2003 PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA ENERGY DIVISION

BILLING CODE P DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY Federal Energy Regulatory Commission. 18 CFR Part 33. [Docket No. RM ]

BEIJING BOSTON BRUSSELS CENTURY CITY CHICAGO DALLAS GENEVA FOUNDED May 1, 2017

March 4, 2015 Advice Letter 3114-E

FUSION TELECOMMUNICATIONS INTERNATIONAL, INC. (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY'S (U 338-E) REPLY TO PROTESTS

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA BEFORE THE FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION

April 10, Via etariff. Hon. Kimberly D. Bose, Secretary Federal Energy Regulatory Commission 888 First Street, N.E. Washington, D.C.

BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

Billing Code P DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY Federal Energy Regulatory Commission. [Docket No. IC ]

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA BEFORE THE FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION

May 6, Ms. Kimberly D. Bose, Secretary Federal Energy Regulatory Commission 888 First Street, N.E. Washington, DC Dear Ms.

Akbar Jazayeri Vice President, Regulatory Operations Southern California Edison Company P O Box 800 Rosemead, CA 91770

September 15, 2017 Advice Letter 3641-E

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA BEFORE THE FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION

December 22, 2005 ADVICE 1947-E (U 338-E) PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA ENERGY DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA BEFORE THE FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION

BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ) )

Unemployment Compensation Discovery Request Instructions

BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA RESPONSE OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY (U 338-E) TO PROTESTS

BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA BEFORE THE FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION

December 28, Via Electronic Filing

September 29, Ms. Kimberly D. Bose, Secretary Federal Energy Regulatory Commission 888 First Street, NE Washington, DC 20426

main. July 6, 2017

December 13, 2004 VIA ELECTRONIC FILING

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA BEFORE THE FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA105 FERC 61,307 FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION

March 1, Notice of Proposed Construction Project Pursuant to General Order 131-D, DowneyMed 66/12 kv Substation

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA BEFORE THE FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

October 9, 2003 PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA ENERGY DIVISION

BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ) ) )

F I L E D :45 PM

Case KJC Doc 166 Filed 04/16/19 Page 1 of 6 IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE.

CONSUMER PRODUCT SAFETY COMMISSION. (CPSC Docket No. 11-C0005) Viking Range Corporation, Provisional Acceptance of a Settlement Agreement and Order

AGREEMENT FOR LIMITED INTERCONNECTION OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY-220 KV SWITCHYARD TO THE ELDORADO SYSTEM FOR AN INTERIM PERIOD AMONG

UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION FORM 8-K MOLSON COORS BREWING COMPANY

Heritage Isle at Viera Community Development District

Southern California Edison Original Cal. PUC Sheet No E Rosemead, California (U 338-E) Cancelling Revised Cal. PUC Sheet No.

PART III GENERAL INFORMATION, INSTRUCTIONS AND CONDITIONS FOR BIDDERS

Authorized By: Civil Service Commission, Robert M. Czech, Chair/CEO.

November 21, Federal Energy Regulatory Commission 888 First Street, N.E. Washington, D.C Attention: Ms. Kimberly D.

152 FERC 61,253 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION

Mailing Address: P.O. Box 1642 Houston, TX

BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA BEFORE THE FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION

Akbar Jazayeri Vice President, Regulatory Operations Southern California Edison Company P O Box 800 Rosemead, CA 91770

Massachusetts Residential and Small Commercial Terms of Service

BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ) ) ) SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY (U 338-E) RESPONSE

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA BEFORE THE FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION. Southern California Edison Company ) Docket No.

International Swaps and Derivatives Association, Inc. ISDA RESOLUTION STAY JURISDICTIONAL MODULAR PROTOCOL

March 1, 2018 Advice Letter 5250-G

Transcription:

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA BEFORE THE FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION Material Changes in Facts Underlying Waiver of Order No. 889 and Part 358 of the Commission s Regulations Docket Nos. AD09-7-000 TS07-3-000 REPORT TO COMMISSION OF MATERIAL CHANGE IN FACTS AND LAW CONCERNING WAIVER GRANTED TO SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY IN DOCKET TS07-3-000 Pursuant to the Order of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission ( FERC or Commission issued May 21, 2009 1 in Docket AD09-7-000, Southern California Edison Company ( SCE hereby informs the Commission that SCE no longer qualifies for the partial waiver of Standards of Conduct granted to SCE in Docket TS07-3-000. I. BACKGROUND: 2007 WAIVER REQUEST On February 26, 2007, SCE filed with the Commission a very limited request for partial waiver of the Standards of Conduct as modified by Order 2004 ( Waiver Request. Specifically, SCE requested that the non-affiliated requirement for consenting parties under section 358.5(b(4 of the Order 2004 Standards of Conduct be waived. Then-section 358.5(b(4 stated: 1 Order Clarifying Requirement To Notify Commission Of Material Changes In Facts And Allowing 45-Day Filing Period For Notifications, 127 FERC 61,141 (issued May 21, 2009. See Ordering Paragraph A ( Any public utility that has received a waiver of Order No. 889 or the Standards of Conduct is hereby directed to notify the Commission if there has been a material change in facts that may affect the waiver.. - 1 -

A non-affiliated transmission customer may voluntarily consent, in writing, to allow the Transmission Provider to share the non-affiliated customer s information with a Marketing or Energy Affiliate. If a non-affiliated customer authorizes the Transmission Provider to share its information with a Marketing or Energy Affiliate, the Transmission Provider must post notice on the OASIS or Internet website of that consent along with a statement that it did not provide any preferences, either operational or rate-related, in exchange for that voluntary consent. 2 SCE requested the waiver because one of SCE s affiliates intended to bid into SCE s competitive solicitation ( Request for Offers or RFO. As SCE pointed out in its Waiver Request, SCE had been ordered by the California Public Utilities Commission ( CPUC to conduct the RFO, and in doing so, to evaluate all bids affiliated and unaffiliated on the same basis. 3 Furthermore, the CPUC had set up various safeguards, including requiring utilities to retain an Independent Evaluator to monitor the process when affiliates intended to bid into the RFO. Additionally, at the time SCE was requesting the waiver, FERC had issued a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking 4 that stated an intention of facilitating Integrated Resource Planning, 5 such as was contemplated by the CPUC in requiring the RFO. On June 11, 2007, the Commission granted SCE s request for partial waiver of the Standards of Conduct, 6 finding that [A]llowing affiliated customers the same opportunity [to voluntarily consent to have their information shared with the Marketing Affiliate] does not violate the purpose or spirit of the standards of conduct since express consent is provided and posted. To do otherwise, would put the energy affiliate at a disadvantage with respect to non-affiliated customers as it relates to the RFOs. 7 Thus, SCE was permitted to share affiliated bidders information with the Marketing Affiliate employees conducting the RFO. 2 18 CFR 358.5(b(4 (the Consent Exemption (emphasis added as it existed in February 2007 (pre-order 717. 3 CPUC Decision 06-07-029 (http://162.15.7.24/published/final_decision/58268.htm. 4 Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, 118 FERC 61,031 (2007. 5 Id. at PP 54-60. 6 Order On Request For Partial Exemption From the Standards Of Conduct, 119 FERC 61,270 (2007. 7 Id. at P 8. - 2 -

II. CHANGE IN CIRCUMSTANCES DISQUALIFYING SCE FROM USE OF WAIVER On October 16, 2008, the Commission issued Order 717, 8 which substantially revised the Standards of Conduct in such a way that SCE no longer qualifies for the waiver granted in Docket TS07-3-000. Specifically, Order 717 eliminated the concept of Energy Affiliates, and revised the definition of Marketing Functions such that the SCE employees who conduct RFOs are no longer considered Marketing Function Employees ( MFEs. Therefore, in accordance with the revised Standards, these RFO employees may now have access to both Non-Public Transmission Function Information and customer information. Additionally, the regulatory text of the Standards of Conduct was revised in Order 717 such that the consent exemption previously found in section 358.5(b(4 no longer exists. Therefore, due to the change in the Standards of Conduct themselves and the resultant change in SCE RFO employee classification under the Standards, SCE no longer qualifies for, or requires, the waiver granted by the Commission. III. CONCLUSION Because of the modifications to the Standards of Conduct effected by Order 717, SCE no longer qualifies for the waiver granted by the Commission in Docket TS07-3-000. Furthermore, due to the reclassification of employees under the revised Standards, SCE no longer requires the waiver. 8 Standards of Conduct for Transmission Providers, 125 FERC 61,064 (2008. - 3 -

Respectfully submitted, JENNIFER R. HASBROUCK ERIN K. MOORE By: Erin K. Moore Attorneys for SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY 2244 Walnut Grove Avenue Post Office Box 800 Rosemead, California 91770 Telephone: (626 302-6848 Facsimile: (626 302-3540 E-mail: erin.moore@sce.com Dated: July 14, 2009-4 -

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that I have this day served the foregoing REPORT TO COMMISSION OF MATERIAL CHANGE IN FACTS AND LAW CONCERNING WAIVER GRANTED TO SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY IN DOCKET TS07-3-000 upon each person designated on the official service list compiled by the Secretary in this proceeding. Dated at Rosemead, California, this 14 th day of July, 2009. Case Analyst SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY 2244 Walnut Grove Avenue Post Office Box 800 Rosemead, California 91770