Eight things you might not know about the Trade Marks Act Michael Edenborough QC 20 May 2014 ITMA evening seminar

Similar documents
VIRGIN ISLANDS FINANCIAL SERVICES (TRADE MARKS FEES) REGULATIONS, 2015 ARRANGEMENT OF SECTIONS

AIPLA Overview of recent developments in Community trade mark law

BELIZE TRADE MARKS ACT CHAPTER 257 REVISED EDITION 2000 SHOWING THE LAW AS AT 31ST DECEMBER, 2000

GUIDELINES FOR EXAMINATION IN THE EUROPEAN UNION INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY OFFICE EDITOR S NOTE AND GENERAL INTRODUCTION

UK (England and Wales)

Unitary Patent in Europe & Unified Patent Court (UPC)

Intellectual Property Regulation Board

HONG KONG Trade Marks Rules as amended by L.N. 62 of 2006 ENTRY INTO FORCE: May 26, 2006 Chapter: 559A

ARE IP COURTS IN EUROPE REALLY UNIFIED? Ian Hiscock (Novartis) Rob Jacob (Stephenson Harwood LLP)

Schedule of Fees - Patents

TRADE MARKS ACT (CHAPTER 332)

TRADE MARKS AND SERVICE MARKS REGULATIONS 1993 BR 31/1993 TRADE MARKS ACT 1974 TRADE MARKS AND SERVICE MARKS REGULATIONS 1993

Drafting Instructions for the Trade Marks Rules THE TRADE MARKS BILL, 2015 ARRANGEMENT OF RULES

The Patent Regulation Board and The Trade Mark Regulation Board. Disciplinary Procedure Rules

AUSTRALIA Patents Act 1990 Compilation date: 24 February 2017 Includes amendments up to: Act No. 61, 2016 Registered: 27 February 2017

Trademark litigation in Europe and the Community trademark

APPLICABILITY TO SOUTH WEST AFRICA:

Trade Marks Act 1994

European Patent with Unitary Effect

2008 No LAND REGISTRATION, ENGLAND AND WALES. The Land Registration (Electronic Conveyancing) Rules 2008

COMMUNITY TRADE MARK ORDER 2014

Council Regulation (EC) No 40/94

THE PRUDENTIAL ASSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED - and - THE PRUDENTIAL INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA

Rectification Wills and Trusts

UK trade mark application opposition procedure

Compilation date: 24 February Includes amendments up to: Act No. 61, Registered: 27 February 2017

UNITED KINGDOM Trade Marks Act Last updated on 27 April 2017.

Rules of Procedure ( Rules ) of the Unified Patent Court

COPERNICUS-TRADEMARKS LTD v OFFICE FOR HARMONISATION IN THE INTERNAL MARKET (TRADE MARKS AND DESIGNS) (OHIM), MAQUET SAS

BUDEJOVICKY BUDVAR NARODNI PODNIK v ANHEUSER-BUSCH INC

ORDINANCE OF THE STATES OF DELIBERATION

PROPERTY RENAISSANCE LTD (T/A TITANIC SPA) V STANLEY DOCK HOTEL LTD (T/A TITANIC HOTEL LIVERPOOL)

AMICUS BRIEF OF THE INTERNATIONAL TRADEMARK ASSOCIATION IN SPECIAL EFFECTS LTD v. L OREAL SA and OTHERS

Lower Filing Fees for Patents and Trade Mark Protection

Patent Attorney and Trade Mark Attorney Qualification and Registration Regulations 2009

BUDĚJOVICKÝ BUDVAR NP v ANHEUSER-BUSCH INC

How the Intellectual Property Act 2014 will change British Unregistered Design Right Law

PROPOSALS FOR CREATING UNITARY PATENT PROTECTION IN THE EUROPEAN UNION

The Intellectual Property Regulation Board (incorporating The Patent Regulation Board and the Trade Mark Regulation Board)

The Patents Act 1977 (as amended)

Preliminary set of provisions for the Rules of procedure of the Unified Patent Court

EU-CHINA INTERNATIONAL SEMINAR ON TRADEMARK LAW. João Miranda de Sousa Head of IP

IP system and latest developments in China. Beijing Sanyou Intellectual Property Agency Ltd. June, 2015

VADEMECUM TO THE COMMUNITY TRADE MARKS BULLETIN

POST-GRANT AMENDMENT JOHN RICHARDS

CHAPTER 315 TRADE MARKS ACT

NEW ZEALAND Trade Marks Regulations SR 2003/187 as at 10 December 2012, as amended by Trade Marks Amendment Regulations (SR 2012/336)

TRADE MARKS ACT 1996 (as amended)

Singapore Trade Marks (International Registration) Rules as amended by S 740 of 2014 ENTRY INTO FORCE: November 13, 2014

PATENT SYSTEM STATUS OFREFORMS

Questionnaire 2. HCCH Judgments Project

ECTA European Communities Trade Mark Association 27 th Annual Meeting in Killarney

Trade Marks Act No 194 of 1993

P7 Principles of Trade Mark Law Mark Scheme Half marks may be awarded where candidates answers do not merit a full mark.

Implementing Regulations to the Convention on the Grant of European Patents

Final Diploma Syllabus

Patents, Trade Marks and Design Rights: Groundless Threats. Summary

IRELAND Trade Marks Act as amended up to and including the February 2, 2016

CHAPTER 416 TRADEMARKS ACT

The Unitary Patent and the Unified Patent Court EPLAW European Patent Lawyers Association Brussels 2 December 2011

TRADE MARKS RULES, 1996 (as amended)

UNITED KINGDOM Patent Rules 2007 as amended up to and including October 1, 2014

Preliminary set of provisions for the Rules of Procedure ( Rules ) of the Unified Patent Court

Trade mark Protection Law and Strategy in Hong Kong

High Court Rules That It Has No Original Jurisdiction To Revoke Patents

law of intellectual property (pp-ii) by pari n. S. Katkar s.y. ll.m

George GRYLLOS, Legal Secretary, General Court Chambers of Judge D. Gratsias

Delegations will find in the Annex a Presidency compromise proposal concerning the abovementioned

Bangladesh Trade Marks Rules Amended on September 10, 1963

EUROPEAN UNION Council Regulation on the Community Trade Mark No. 207/2009 of 26 February 2009 ENTRY INTO FORCE: April 13, 2009

Patent litigation. Block 2. Module Jurisdiction and procedure Complementary reading: Unified Patent Court Agreement ( UPCA )

REPUBLIC OF SINGAPORE GOVERNMENT GAZETTE ACTS SUPPLEMENT. Published by Authority NO. 28] FRIDAY, DECEMBER 21 [2012 REPUBLIC OF SINGAPORE

APU JOINT STOCK COMPANY v SINGER (CHINGGIS KHAN TRADE MARK)

Geneva, March 30, 2017 Practical Experience From a Practitioner s point of View

General Part of the Economic Activities Code Act 1

PAPER: FC5 MARKS AWARDED: 56

MALAYSIA COUNTRY REPORT FOR APAA 2015 TRADE MARK COMMITTEE DEVELOPMENTS:- Legislative

478 Kenya. Subsidiary Legislation, LEGAL NOTICE No Citation. 1,.N. 575/1956. Old classifications preserved.

Continuing Professional Development Regulations 2013

BOIP Recent Developments

The Canadian Abridgment edigests -- Intellectual Property

VADEMECUM TO THE EUROPEAN UNION TRADE MARKS BULLETIN

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT. 18 June 2002 (1)

S.I. No. 199/1996: TRADE MARKS RULES, 1996 ARRANGEMENT OF RULES. Preliminary

Geneva, November 10, 2016 Experience From a Practitioner s point of View

Draft agreement on a Unified Patent Court and draft Statute - Revised Presidency text

Act No. 8 of 2015 BILL

TRADE MARKS TRADE MARKS

IP Translator brand owner perspectives

Section 76 of the Act provides for the rectification of errors or omissions in the register. The requirements for rectification read as follows:

COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION. Brussels, 7 April /09 Interinstitutional File: 2000/0177 (CNS) PI 28

Dehns Guide to the Unitary Patent and Unified Patent Court

Trade Marks Act, 1996 (Community Trade Mark) Regulations (S.I. No. 229 of 2000) The Irish Patent Office

FC5 (P7) Trade Mark Law Mark Scheme 2015

The Geographical Indications of Goods (Registration and Protection) Act, 1999

A trademark licensee s position in Italian & CTM practice By Edith Van den Eede

UNIFIED PATENT COURT (UPC) Einheitliches Patentgericht (EPG) Juridiction Unifiée du Brevet (JUB)

The European Union NGO acting in the field of Trade Marks, Designs and related rights. Caring for a balance of rights over three decades

UPC FUTURE OF PATENT LITIGATION IN EUROPE. Alexander Haertel

The Community Trade Mark and the National Trade Marks Are they in harmony? The Benelux point of view.

Transcription:

Eight things you might not know about the Trade Marks Act 1994 Michael Edenborough QC 20 May 2014 ITMA evening seminar

The byways of the TMA 1994 s 21: groundless threats s 24: assignment of TMs and goodwill s 34: classification issues ss 43 & 45: renewal and surrender s 46: time periods for revocation s 64: rectification s 68: security for costs s 87: privilege

s 21: groundless threats the relief is against the threatener lay client, professional client, individual can be used to start the litigation alternatively, by way of counterclaim if sued but then need permission to join a new party Reckitt Benkiser (UK) Ltd v Home Pairfum Ltd [2004] EWHC 302 (Ch); [2004] FSR 37; [2005] ETMR 94 Law Commission report on Threats

s 24: assignment of TMs and goodwill s 24(1): a TM may be assigned independently of the goodwill of a business consequences if sever the goodwill from the TM assignor can still trade using the indicium the TM may now be misleading and so be vulnerable to revocation pursuant to s 46(1)(d) s 24(6): does not affect the assignment of an indicium as part of the goodwill of a business assignment in gross of goodwill is void at common law

s 34: classification issues s 34(2): registrar s decision is final on classification issues therefore, cannot appeal the point only judicial review is available wrong in law or unreasonable decision IP Translator points: eg Advance Magazine v OHIM Case T-229/12 accessories in class 18 not sufficiently identifiable

ss 43 & 45: renewal and surrender voluntary may result from mediation s 43, rr-34-37, TM11 and TM13: renewal (at the request of the proprietor (vs. reg. pro.)(payment by a TP) and removal for non-payment of renewal fees r 37(1): restoration if just to do so s 45, r 33, TM22 and TM23: surrender r 33(2): 3 months notice to a person with a registered interest in the mark in question intervention possible? contrast ss 46 and 47: court-ordered with no notice provisions to third parties

s 46: time periods for revocation Calendar confusion ITMA review, issue 401, May 2013, pp 16-17 filed 1 Jan 00; reg 1 Oct 00; TM26(N) 20 May 2014 5 year periods: s 46(1)(a): 2 Oct 00 1 Oct 05 intervening s 46(1)(b): 2 Oct 05 1 Oct 10 last s 46(1)(b): 20 May 09 19 May 14 effective revocation dates 2 Oct 05, 2 Oct 10, 20 May 14 more than 3 periods possible

s 64: rectification or correction of the register revocation / invalidation / rectification vs cancellation s 64(1), r 44, TM26(R): error / omission (but not affecting validity of the TM) (Avon Gripster [2009] RPC 17) maybe by a TP unless otherwise ordered: ab initio s 64(4), r 52, TM 21: name / address of pro or Lee r 52: any person having an interest in or charge on a TM s 64(5), r 53, TM7: removal of matter ceasing to have effect notice to those affected

s 68: security for costs CPR Part 24 rr 12-15 against protagonist out of the jurisdiction or not Brussels Contracting State s 68: against any party to the proceedings consequences if security is not given r 68(2): in default, consider withdrawn &c. r 62(1)(f): stays, &c

s 87: privilege s 87(1): any matter relating to the protection of any design or trade mark or as to any matter involving passing-off s 87(2): akin to legal advice privilege (R (otao Prudential plc) v Special Commissioner of Income Tax (AIPPI intervening): [2013] 2 WLR 325; [2013] 2 All ER 247) s 87(3): registered trade mark attorney not trainees (unless working for an RTA or similar) in-house (Akzo Nobel Chemicals v EC Case C-550/07 P)

Michael Edenborough QC Contact Details: Serle Court, 6 New Square, Lincoln s Inn, WC2A 3QS (t) 020 7242 6105 (e) MEdenborough@SerleCourt.co.uk MA (Natural Sciences) (Cantab), DPhil (Biophysics) (Oxon) All areas of IP law and practice, in particular patents, trade marks, copyright and designs. 100 reported cases since 2000, of which two thirds were appeals or judicial reviews. Appeared often before the CJEU and the GC (Luxembourg) in appeals from OHIM and Article 267 references (over 40 cases), and in the EPO (Legal and Technical BoA and Opposition Division). Appeared in over 275 matters before the TM registry, and over 50 appeals before the Appointed Person. Acted for the UK government, Comptroller-General of Patents, Registrar of Trade Marks, CIPA, ITMA and AIPPI UK.