IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE SIXTH CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA CIVIL DIVISION

Similar documents
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE THIRTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT FOR HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY, FLORIDA CIVIL DIVISION

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE TENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT FOR POLK COUNTY, FLORIDA CIVIL DIVISION

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE EIGHTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR SEMINOLE COUNTY, FLORIDA. Plaintiff, CASE NO. :

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE TENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR POLK COUNTY, FLORIDA CIVIL DIVISION

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE SEVENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR VOLUSIA COUNTY, FLORIDA. Plaintiff, CASE NO. :

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE THIRTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY, FLORIDA - CIVIL DIVISION -

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE SEVENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR VOLUSIA COUNTY, FLORIDA. Plaintiff, CASE NO. :

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIRST JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR SANTA ROSA COUNTY, FLORIDA. Plaintiffs, CASE NO. :

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIRST JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR SANTA ROSA COUNTY, FLORIDA. Plaintiffs, CASE NO. :

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE TWELFTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR SARASOTA COUNTY, FLORIDA CIVIL DIVISION

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA -CIVIL DIVISION-

Filing # E-Filed 05/08/ :47:12 PM

Filing # E-Filed 07/13/ :52:45 AM

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE NINTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR ORANGE COUNTY, FLORIDA - CIVIL DIVISION - Plaintiff CASE NO.

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE SIXTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA - CIVIL DIVISION -

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE SIXTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA CIVIL ACTION

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE SECOND JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR LEON COUNTY, FLORIDA COMPLAINT

OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA, DEPARTMENT OF LEGAL AFFAIRS, Plaintiff, v. CASE NO: COMPLAINT

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE NINTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT ORANGE COUNTY, FLORIDA CIVIL ACTION

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE ELEVENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR MIAMI-DADE COUNTY, FLORIDA

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE TWELFTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR SARASOTA, MANATEE, DESOTO COUNTY, FLORIDA

HOMEWARD BOUND SERVICES OF NORTH AMERICA MARC ORTH

COMPLAINT. Plaintiff, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA, DEPARTMENT OF LEGAL AFFAIRS, ( PLAINTIFF or the ATTORNEY GENERAL ),

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE SECOND JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR LEON COUNTY, FLORIDA

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE NINTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT ORANGE COUNTY, FLORIDA CIVIL ACTION

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE SECOND JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR LEON COUNTY, FLORIDA

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE NINTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT ORANGE COUNTY, FLORIDA CIVIL ACTION

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE SEVENTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR BROWARD COUNTY, FLORIDA

Filing # E-Filed 03/07/ :02:15 AM

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE SEVENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR ST. JOHNS COUNTY, FLORIDA

Case 8:14-cv CEH-MAP Document 8 Filed 08/27/14 Page 1 of 22 PageID 56

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE SEVENTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR BROWARD COUNTY, FLORIDA

IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS FRANKLIN COUNTY, OHIO

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE TWENTIETH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR LEE COUNTY, FLORIDA

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE SEVENTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR BROWARD COUNTY, FLORIDA

FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION, Plaintiff,

Filing # E-Filed 06/13/ :25:39 PM

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY

Filing # E-Filed 01/31/ :35:29 PM

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA

CITY OF TREASURE ISLAND, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS REGULAR WORKSHOP JUNE 2, 2015 IMMEDIATELY FOLLOWING THE COMMISSION MEETING

Case 8:16-cv JDW-JSS Document 1 Filed 09/22/16 Page 1 of 20 PageID 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

Case 1:15-cv MGC Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 03/12/2015 Page 1 of 17 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

RELIEF FOR VIOLATIONS OF: SOLARCITY CORPORATION,

FILED SAN MAteO COUNTY

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE SEVENTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR BROWARD COUNTY, FLORIDA

Case 5:16-cv Document 1 Filed 09/12/16 Page 1 of 16 Page ID #:1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA MIAMI DIVISION. CASE NO: 1:15-cv RNS

Case 9:11-cv KAM Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/09/2011 Page 1 of 14 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA. Case No.

Case 3:16-cv SK Document 1 Filed 08/17/16 Page 1 of 23

Case 0:17-cv XXXX Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 01/13/2017 Page 1 of 12

Superior Court of California

Case3:15-cv Document1 Filed07/10/15 Page1 of 12

Case 3:17-cv DMS-RBB Document 1 Filed 03/17/17 PageID.1 Page 1 of 20

Case 9:18-cv RLR Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/22/2018 Page 1 of 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA CASE NO.: CA XXXXAB CONSENT FINAL JUDGMENT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

"~'J;' v" 02li 34r...,;;

Plaintiff, JOSE GILBERTO SERRANO, Pro Se, hereby files this Response to the Motion to. Introduction

CRS Report for Congress

South Carolina Code of Laws (Unannotated) Current through the end of the 2008 Session DISCLAIMER

Case 3:13-cv JE Document 1 Filed 12/20/13 Page 1 of 13 Page ID#: 1

Case 9:16-cv RLR Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/15/2016 Page 1 of 6

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA GAINESVILLE DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TAMPA DIVISION

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE THIRTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, FOR HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY, FLORIDA CIVIL DIVISION

IN THE COUNTY COURT, IN AND FOR PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA SMALL CLAIMS DIVISION PLAINTIFF S AMENDED COMPLAINT

Case3:15-cv Document1 Filed01/09/15 Page1 of 16

Courthouse News Service

Case 5:18-cv TLB Document 1 Filed 11/14/18 Page 1 of 19 PageID #: 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. Defendant.

ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFF FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION, Plaintiff,

Case4:13-cv YGR Document23 Filed05/03/13 Page1 of 34

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. Case No:

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE ELEVENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR MIAMI-DADE COUNTY, FLORIDA

Case 3:14-cv DMS-DHB Document 1 Filed 06/04/14 Page 1 of 17

e; SktS5 OFFiec 2011MAY 10 FILED CiffiliAL 4DIVISVt CLEgit-StiPERICR SAW DIEGO COUNTY. CA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SACRAMENTO DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) E.D. Case No.

Case 4:16-cv DMR Document 1 Filed 02/09/16 Page 1 of 21

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FOURTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR NASSAU COUNTY, FLORIDA CIVIL ACTION. vs. DIVISION: A

IN THE COUNTY COURT, IN AND FOR PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA SMALL CLAIMS DIVISION PLAINTIFF S COMPLAINT

STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF LEGAL AFFAIRS ASSURANCE OF VOLUNTARY COMPLIANCE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA MIAMI DIVISION Case No. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case 1:15-cv Document 1 Filed 02/27/15 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS. COMPLAINT and Jury Demand

Filing # E-Filed 07/31/ :13:49 PM

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Case 3:17-cv MMA-BLM Document 1-3 Filed 11/03/17 PageID.12 Page 2 of 20 (619) (619)

Case 2:12-cv JCM-VCF Document 1 Filed 11/13/12 Page 1 of 10

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE SEVENTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR BROWARD COUNTY, FLORIDA. Plaintiff, Case No.: (09)

Case 3:13-cv BTM-NLS Document 1-1 Filed 10/16/13 Page 1 of 28 EXHIBIT A

OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF LEGAL AFFAIRS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Case 4:16-cv MW-CAS Document 26 Filed 10/11/16 Page 1 of 10 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

CIRCUIT COURT OF COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS COUNTY DEPARTMENT, CHANCERY DIVISION

Case 0:10-cv MJD-FLN Document 1 Filed 04/06/10 Page 1 of 14 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA. Court File No.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA. Plaintiff, for its complaint, by and through its attorney, alleges that:

STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF LEGAL AFFAIRS 5 STAR INVESTMENTS, INC. D/B/A AG# L BEST WESTERN OF VERO BEACH

Transcription:

Filing # 50347983 E-Filed 12/20/2016 05:11:23 PM IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE SIXTH CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA CIVIL DIVISION OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA, DEPARTMENT OF LEGAL AFFAIRS, Plaintiff, v. SHANTI CC CLEARWATER, LLC, a Florida Limited Liability Company, d/b/a RED ROOF INN CLEARWATER, SHANTI CC HOLDING, LLC, a Delaware Limited Liability Company, PACKARD HOSPITALITY MANAGEMENT, LLC, a Foreign Limited Liability Company, and MICHAEL GOLDSTEIN, an Individual, Case Number: Defendants. COMPLAINT Plaintiff, Office of the Attorney General, State of Florida, Department of Legal Affairs (the Attorney General ), sues Defendants, Shanti CC Clearwater, LLC ( Shanti ) d/b/a Red Roof Inn Clearwater ( Red Roof ), Packard Hospitality Management, LLC ( Packard ), Shanti CC Holding, LLC ( Shanti Holding ), and Michael Goldstein, an individual ( Goldstein and together with Shanti, Packard, and Shanti Holding, Defendants ), and alleges the following:

JURISDICTION AND VENUE 1. This is an action for injunctive relief, restitution, disgorgement, civil penalties, attorney s fees and costs, and other statutory relief against Defendants pursuant to the Florida Deceptive and Unfair Trade Practices Act, Chapter 501, Part II, Florida Statutes ( FDUTPA ), and Section 501.160, Florida Statutes (2016), prohibiting unconscionable prices in the rental or sale of essential commodities during a declared state of emergency. 2. This Court has jurisdiction pursuant to the provisions of FDUTPA. The Attorney General seeks relief in an amount greater than Fifteen Thousand Dollars ($15,000.00), exclusive of interest, costs, and attorney s fees. 3. Defendant Shanti s principal place of business is located in Pinellas County. The statutory violations alleged herein affect or occurred in the Sixth Judicial Circuit in and for Pinellas County, Florida. Accordingly, the venue is proper in Pinellas County and in the Sixth Judicial Circuit, pursuant to the provisions of FDUTPA. 4. All actions material to this Complaint occurred in 2016, and within four (4) years of the filing date of this action. 5. The Attorney General has conducted an investigation of the matters alleged herein, and the head of the enforcing authority, Attorney General Pamela 2

Jo Bondi, has determined that this enforcement action serves the public interest, as required by Section 501.207(2), Florida Statutes (2016). 6. All conditions precedent to this action have been performed, or have occurred. PARTIES 7. Plaintiff, the Attorney General, is an enforcing authority pursuant to Section 501.203(2) of FDUTPA and Section 501.160(8), Florida Statutes, and is authorized to bring this action and seek injunctive and other statutory and equitable relief pursuant to FDUTPA and Sections 501.160 and 501.164, Florida Statutes. 8. Defendant Shanti is an active Florida limited liability company registered with the State of Florida, Department of State, Division of Corporations, since January 2016, with its principal place of business located at 3580 Ulmerton Road, Clearwater, FL 33762. Shanti conducts and, at all times material hereto, has conducted business from within the state of Florida. 9. Defendant Shanti operates and, at all times material hereto, has operated, Red Roof, an overnight lodging business, which offers rooms for rent ( Lodging Business ) at 3580 Ulmerton Road, Clearwater, FL 33762. 10. Defendant Shanti, at all times material hereto, has done business as Red Roof; however, it has never registered Red Roof as a fictitious name in the state of Florida and is thereby in violation of Section 865.09, Florida Statutes. In 3

March 2016, Defendant Shanti entered into a franchise agreement with Red Roof Franchising, LLC. 11. Defendant Shanti Holding is an active Delaware limited liability company. Defendant Shanti Holding is and, at all times material hereto, has been a manager of Defendant Shanti. 12. Defendant Packard is an active foreign limited liability company registered with the State of Florida, Department of State, Division of Corporations to transact business in Florida since October 2012, with its principal place of business located at 9555 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 202, San Diego, CA 92123. 13. Defendant Packard manages and, at all times relevant hereto, has managed Defendant Shanti s Lodging Business. 14. Defendant Michael Goldstein is an individual who, upon information and belief, resides and, at all times material hereto, has resided in San Diego, CA 92123. 15. Defendant Goldstein is, and at all times material hereto, has been a managing member of Shanti Holding. 16. Defendant Goldstein, upon information and belief, directly participates in, manages, operates, and controls and, upon information and belief, at all times material hereto, has participated in, managed, operated, and controlled the operations of Shanti, Shanti Holding, and Packard, including, but not limited 4

to, upon information and belief, making all operational and financial decisions for Shanti, Shanti Holding, and Packard. 17. Upon information and belief, Defendant Goldstein holds either a direct or indirect interest in Shanti, Shanti Holding, and Packard. 18. Defendants engage and, at all times material hereto, have engaged in trade or commerce as defined in Section 501.203(8), Florida Statutes, by offering rooms for rent. DEFENDANTS COURSE OF BUSINESS 19. On October 3, 2016, Florida Governor Rick Scott, following the forecast from the National Hurricane Center, which suggested that large portions of the East Coast of Florida may face significant impact from Hurricane Matthew, issued Executive Order 16-230 declaring a state of emergency in every county in the state of Florida ( State of Emergency ). Upon declaration of the State of Emergency relating to Hurricane Matthew, Attorney General Pamela Jo Bondi activated a price gouging hotline to enable consumers to contact the Attorney General and report excessive increases in the prices of essential items, such as food, ice, gas, hotels, lumber, and water during the State of Emergency, in violation of Section 501.160, Florida Statutes. 20. On October 6, 2016, Hurricane Matthew strengthened into a dangerous category 4 hurricane, with sustained winds ranging from 130 mph to 5

156 mph, and began hitting Florida in an expected 500-mile trek of life-threatening winds and storm surge from West Palm Beach to South Carolina. Governor Scott issued a warning to over 1.5 million coastal residents located in certain evacuation zones that Hurricane Matthew may become deadly and urged them to leave their homes and seek shelter. President Obama declared a state of emergency in more than two dozen Florida counties as a potentially catastrophic storm approached. Residents along the East Coast of Florida fled for their safety and sought accommodations at hotels in the Tampa Bay area. 21. On October 7, 2016, Hurricane Matthew moved very close along the Eastern Coast of Florida as a category 4 hurricane, with wind gusts reported as high as 87 mph in Jacksonville, 91 mph in Daytona Beach, and 107 mph in Cape Canaveral, causing major wind and flood damage to homes and businesses, and leaving over one million Floridians without power. In Florida, at least 11 deaths can be attributed to either the storm itself, events leading up to the storm, or its aftermath. 22. Section 9 of Executive Order 16-230 issued by Governor Scott on October 3, 2016 provides as follows: Pursuant to Section 501.160, Florida Statutes, it is unlawful and a violation of Section 501.204 for a person to rent or sell or offer to rent or sell at an unconscionable price within the area for which the state of emergency is declared, any essential commodity including, but not limited to, supplies, services, provisions, or equipment that is 6

necessary for consumption or use as a direct result of the emergency. 23. During a State of Emergency, a price for the rental or lease of any dwelling unit is considered unconscionable under Section 501.160, Florida Statutes, if it represents a gross disparity between the price being charged during the emergency and the average price in effect during the thirty (30) days prior to a state of emergency. In this instance, when Governor Scott issued the order on October 3, 2016 declaring a state of emergency for Hurricane Matthew, Pinellas County was still under a previously declared, 60-day state of emergency in Executive Order 16-205 for tropical Depression #9, which later became Tropical Storm Hermine. 24. Defendants engaged in unconscionable pricing practices in violation of Section 501.160 when the prices charged during Hurricane Matthew are compared both to the average prices being charged thirty (30) days prior in September, when the state of emergency for Hermine was in effect, and thirty (30) days prior to that in August, when no state of emergency was in effect for Pinellas County. 25. Defendants unconscionable pricing practices and unconscionable, deceptive and unfair acts and practices in trade or commerce during the State of Emergency are illustrated by the following facts: 7

A. Red Roof raised room rates on October 6 and 7, 2016 ( Evacuation Days ) for many guests who were evacuating their homes due to Hurricane Matthew. By way of example, at least twenty-seven (27) Red Roof guests paid approximately between $117.00 and $210.00 per night on Evacuation Days. This is a gross disparity between the average price charged for rooms in August and September which ranged from $62.00 in August to $61.00 in September. The October increases during Hurricane Matthew represent nightly room rate increases of approximately 89% to 238% over the average nightly rate of $62.00 paid in August. Some guests were charged $148.00 more than the average nightly rate during the relevant period. B. In the days following Hurricane Matthew, Red Roof reduced their nightly rates to an average of $61.00 per night. 26. Many Floridians paid extremely high and unconscionable prices for rooms at Red Roof during the Evacuation Days, when compared to the average nightly rates charged in August, thirty (30) days prior to the State of Emergency declared related to Hermine, as well as in September, thirty (30) days prior the State of Emergency declared related to Hurricane Mathew. COUNT I UNCONSCIONABLE PRICING DURING DECLARED STATE OF EMERGENCY (VIOLATIONS OF SECTION 501.160, FLORIDA STATUTES) 8

27. The Attorney General re-alleges and incorporates by reference paragraphs 1-26 above. 28. Pursuant to Section 501.160(3), Florida Statutes, charging unconscionable prices for the rental or lease of any dwelling unit is unlawful. 29. Section 501.160, Florida Statutes, provides that it is prima facie evidence that a price is unconscionable if there is a gross disparity between the present price charged and the average price charged, in the usual course of business, during the 30 days prior to a declaration of a state of emergency, or the price grossly exceeds the average prices at which the same or similar goods were available 30 days immediately prior to the state of emergency. 30. By engaging in the activities described in paragraph 25 above, such as increasing its nightly room rates by approximately 89%-238% and in some instances charging guests $148 more than the average nightly rate during the relevant period prior to the State of Emergency, Defendants have charged grossly excessive and unconscionable nightly rates and have violated Section 501.160, Florida Statutes. 31. Pursuant to Section 501.164, Florida Statutes, Defendants are subject to a penalty of up to $1,000.00 per violation with an aggregate total not to exceed $25,000.00 for any 24-hour period. 9

32. These above-described acts and practices of Defendants have injured the public. 33. Defendants willfully engaged in the acts and practices when they knew or should have known that said acts and practices were unfair or deceptive or prohibited by law. 10

COUNT II FLORIDA DECEPTIVE AND UNFAIR TRADE PRACTICES ACT (VIOLATIONS OF SECTION 501.204, FLORIDA STATUTES) 34. The Attorney General re-alleges and incorporates by reference paragraphs 1-26 and further alleges: 35. Section 501.204(1), Florida Statutes ( FDUTPA ), declares unconscionable acts or practices in the conduct of any trade or commerce to be unlawful. 36. As set forth in Section 501.160(3), Florida Statutes, charging unconscionable prices in a declared state of emergency is a violation of FDUTPA. By undertaking the activities described in paragraph 25 herein, such as increasing its nightly room rates by approximately 89%-238% and in some instances charging guests $148 more than the average nightly rate during the relevant period prior to the State of Emergency, Defendants have engaged in unconscionable, unfair, and/or deceptive acts and practices in violation of Section 501.204, Florida Statutes. 37. As set forth in paragraph 25, above, Defendants have 1) committed acts or practices in trade or commerce, which shock the conscience, engaged in representations, acts, practices or omissions, which are material, and which are likely to mislead consumers acting reasonably under the circumstances; 2) committed acts or practices in trade or commerce which offend established public 11

policy and are unethical, oppressive, unscrupulous or substantially injurious to consumers; and/or 3) engaged in acts or practices that are likely to cause substantial injury to consumers, which are not reasonably avoidable by consumers themselves or outweighed by countervailing benefits to consumers or competition. Thus, Defendants have engaged in unfair or deceptive acts or practices in the conduct of any trade or commerce in violation of FDUTPA. 38. These above-described acts and practices of Defendants have injured the public. 39. Defendants have willfully engaged in the acts and practices when they knew or should have known that such acts and practices were unfair or deceptive or otherwise prohibited by law. Defendants are subject to civil penalties for willful violations of FDUTPA in the amount of Ten Thousand Dollars ($10,000.00) for each violation pursuant to Section 501.2075, Florida Statutes, and Fifteen Thousand Dollars ($15,000.00) for each violation that victimized or attempted to victimize, a senior citizen pursuant to Section 501.2077, Florida Statutes. RELIEF REQUESTED WHEREFORE, the Attorney General respectfully requests that this Court enter judgment: A. Permanently enjoining Defendants, its officers, agents, servants, employees, attorneys, and those persons in active concert or participation with 12

them, who receive actual notice of the injunction, from engaging in the acts and practices in violation of provisions of FDUTPA and Section 501.160, Florida Statutes, as specifically alleged above and any similar acts and practices relating to charging unconscionable prices for rooms during a state of emergency; B. Awarding equitable remedies, including refunds to consumers and disgorgement of revenues; C. Assessing against Defendants civil penalties in the amount of Ten Thousand Dollars ($10,000.00) for each violation of FDUTPA in accordance with Section 501.2075, Florida Statutes, Fifteen Thousand Dollars ($15,000.00) for each violation that victimized or attempted to victimize, a senior citizen in accordance with Section 501.2077, Florida Statutes, and up to One Thousand Dollars ($1,000.00) for each violation with an aggregate total not to exceed Twenty-Five Thousand Dollars ($25,000.00) for any 24-hour period, in accordance with Section 501.164, Florida Statutes; D. Awarding the Attorney General reasonable attorney s fees and costs pursuant to the provisions of Section 501.2105 of FDUTPA, and as otherwise allowable by applicable statutes or law; E. Ordering Defendants to register all fictitious names, including Red Roof Inn Clearwater, with the state of Florida, pursuant to Section 865.09, Florida Statutes (2016); and 13

F. Awarding any other equitable relief pursuant to Section 501.207, Florida Statutes, and such other relief as the interests of justice shall require and that this Honorable Court may deem just and proper. Dated this 20 th day of December, 2016. Respectfully Submitted, PAMELA JO BONDI ATTORNEY GENERAL By: /s/ Robert J. Follis Robert J. Follis Assistant Attorney General Florida Bar No.: 560200 Email: Robert.Follis@myfloridalegal.com Office of the Attorney General Department of Legal Affairs 3507 East Frontage Road, Suite 325 Tampa, Florida 33607 Phone: (813) 287-7950 Facsimile: (813) 281-5515 Counsel for Plaintiff 14