Defendant-Appellee. CITY OF SOUTHFIELD,

Similar documents
Petition for Ex-Parte Order

IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

STATE OF MICHIGAN IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR THE COUNTY OF WAYNE. Hon. Leslie Kim Smith

Case 1:11-cv JTN Doc #102 Filed 03/27/12 Page 1 of 4 Page ID#560 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN (SOUTHERN DIVISION)

BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF MOTION FOR EMERGENCY PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION: CLOSURE

X : : : : : : : : : : : : X. JOHN F. KEENAN, United States District Judge: Plaintiff, Federal Insurance Company ( Federal ) has moved

STATE OF MICHIGAN IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR THE COUNTY OF WAYNE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF IDAHO ORDER

SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT AND DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL

Case 1:14-at Document 6 Filed 02/19/14 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Case 1:14-cv JTN Doc #19 Filed 02/11/15 Page 1 of 7 Page ID#544 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

US DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

Courthouse News Service

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION. CITY OF DETROIT, MICHIGAN, Case No

STATE OF MICHIGAN IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR THE COUNTY OF OAKLAND. Case No. Plaintiffs/Counter-Defendants, Hon. v

VERIFIED COMPLAINT FOR DECLARATORY AND INJUNCTIVE RELIEF

1:13-cv TLL-CEB Doc # 1 Filed 07/28/13 Pg 1 of 6 Pg ID 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN NORTHERN DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

Original - Court 1st copy - Defendant CASE NO. JUDICIAL DISTRICT

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA Cause No.

THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA EASTERN DIVISION. Case No.

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 12/08/ :46 PM INDEX NO /2013 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 29 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 12/08/2014 ATTORNEY AFFIRMATION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION. Plaintiffs, Case 2:10-cv v. HON.

Notice of Petition; and, Verified Petition For Warrant Of Removal

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF FORSYTH COUNTY0 INTHISc:fl'l~""''OJ STATE OF GEORGIA VERIFIED COMPLAINT

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE TENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR POLK COUNTY, FLORIDA CIVIL DIVISION

STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL, THIRD CIRCUIT **********

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA -CIVIL DIVISION-

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION. Civil Action No: HON. COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT

AGREED MOTION FOR ENTRY OF CONSENT JUDGMENT AND PERMANENT INJUNCTION

STATE OF MICHIGAN IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR THE COUNTY OF MACOMB. In re CITY OF STERLING HEIGHTS, Case No AS Hon.

Case 1:14-cv Document 1 Filed 02/18/14 Page 1 of 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS AUSTIN DIVISION

STATE OF MICHIGAN IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR THE COUNTY OF OAKLAND

CITY OF AUBURN HILLS COUNTY OF OAKLAND STATE OF MICHIGAN ORDINANCE NO. TEXT AMENDMENT TO ZONING ORDINANCE

Case: EEB Doc#:19 Filed:12/04/14 Entered:12/04/14 15:24:27 Page1 of 6

Pursuant to NY CLS CPLR 6301 et seq., Plaintiffs Meadowsweet Dairy, LLC and

STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS

Case 1:08-cv Document 1 Filed 10/07/2008 Page 1 of 8

Case 1:18-cv PLM-RSK ECF No. 40 filed 03/01/19 PageID.305 Page 1 of 5

Case 3:13-cv CAB-WMC Document 10 Filed 03/29/13 Page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Sparta Commercial Servs. Inc. v Vis Vires Group Inc 2016 NY Slip Op 30199(U) February 2, 2016 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number:

Case 1:15-cv CG-N Document 1 Filed 02/24/15 Page 1 of 7

Filing # E-Filed 04/10/ :26:28 AM

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION. v. CIVIL ACTION NO.

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF POTTAWATOMIE COUNTY STATE OF OKLAHOMA

STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS

Case 8:17-cv VMC-MAP Document 28 Filed 09/28/17 Page 1 of 3 PageID 437 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TAMPA DIVISION

thejasminebrand.com thejasminebrand.com

Case 1:15-cv MSK Document 9 Filed 06/22/15 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 6

2:12-cv DPH-MAR Doc # 6 Filed 04/05/12 Pg 1 of 7 Pg ID 60 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

STATE OF MICHIGAN IN THE SIXTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT COURT COUNTY OF OAKLAND

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

STATE OF MICHIGAN. Case No.: 14- CZ. Hon.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT

Motion to Stay Arbitration and Emergency Motion for Temporary Restraining

Chapter 8 - Common Law

INSTRUCTIONS PETITION FOR EXPUNGEMENT OF CRIMINAL RECORDS PROVIDED UNDER W.VA. CODE

) CascNo.6O/V3?O APR ) $CLERK&I4ATER /) ) ) Comes now Plaintiff, Shayne Kyle Austin, by and through his counsel, Luke A.

DEFENDANT CITY OF FORT COLLINS MOTION FOR STAY PENDING APPEAL

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS COUNTY DEPARTMENT, CHANCERY DIVISION

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE SIXTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA CIVIL ACTION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TAMPA DIVISION. No. 8:05-CV-530-T-27TBM

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR CALVERT COUNTY, MARYLAND

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF STODDARD COUNTY, MISSOURI

Case 3:14-cv RBL Document 26 Filed 10/23/14 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT TACOMA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION PLAINTIFF S ORIGINAL COMPLAINT

Case 1:14-cv LG-JMR Document 7 Filed 04/14/14 Page 1 of 9

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TEXARKANA DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT

25 Indian Rd. Owners Corp. v Baez 2017 NY Slip Op 30158(U) January 26, 2017 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: /16 Judge: Kathryn E.

DISTRICT COURT, LARIMER COUNTY, COLORADO. 201 La Porte Avenue, Suite 100 Fort Collins, CO Phone: (970) Plaintiff:

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA * CIVIL ACTION * * NO. * IN RE SEARCH AND SEIZURE * JUDGE * * MAGISTRATE COMPLAINT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION. Chapter 9 Hon. Steven W. Rhodes

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE SECOND JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR LEON COUNTY, FLORIDA

2:14-cv LPZ-RSW Doc # 21 Filed 05/08/14 Pg 1 of 10 Pg ID 235 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

Case 1:13-cv WJM-BNB Document 23 Filed 10/17/13 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

CASE NO E UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT. HON. TOM PARKER, Associate Justice of the Supreme Court of Alabama,

OBJECTION TO REFEREE S RECOMMENDED ORDER

IN UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

ORAL ARGUMENT PREVIOUSLY SCHEDULED MARCH 31, No IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

IN THE GENERAL COURT OF JUSTICE SUPERIOR COURT DIVISION WAKE COUNTY 14 CVS 13934

12 CVS. Scenic NC, Inc., ) Plaintiff ) ) ) North Carolina Department of MOTION FOR TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER. ) Transportation, ) Defendant )

9:30 a.m. MOTION CALL, CASE MANAGEMENT, STATUS DATES 10:00 a.m. 2:30 p.m. MATTERS SET BY THE COURT

Petitioners, * COURT OF APPEALS. v. * OF MARYLAND. MARIROSE JOAN CAPOZZI, et al., * September Term, Respondents. * Petition Docket No.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

and Samantha Rae Bewick (together, the "Petitioners"), as the joint supervisors under the

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA. Plaintiff, for its complaint, by and through its attorney, alleges that:

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA CHARLOTTE DIVISION 3:14-cv-23-RJC-DCK

FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND ORDER ON COMPLAINT FOR TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION AND DECLARATORY RELIEF

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION. Plaintiff, Case No: COMPLAINT

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE NINTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR ORANGE COUNTY, FLORIDA

Case 1:07-cv Document 19 Filed 09/18/2007 Page 1 of 15

Case 1:16-cv Document 1 Filed 06/05/16 Page 1 of 7

Transcription:

STATE OF MICHIGAN CITY OF SOUTHFIELD, IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR THE COUNTY OF OAKLAND Plaintiff, Case No. 2016- AA JORDAN DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, L.L.C., a limited liability company, and WORD OF FAITH CHRISTIAN CENTER CHURCH, a non-profit corporation, Hon. -and- Defendants, MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY, an agency of the State of Michigan, Defendant-Appellee. CUMMINGS, McCLOREY, DAVIS & ACHO, P.L.C. By: RONALD G. ACHO (P-23913) ELIZABETH RAE-O'DONNELL (P 41529) GREGORY A. ROBERTS (P-33984) 33900 Schoolcraft Road Livonia, MI 48150-1392 (734) 261-2400 racho@ cmda-law.com erae@cmda-law.com groberts@cmda-law.com Attorneys for Plaintiff CITY OF SOUTHFIELD By: SUSAN P. WARD-WITOWSKI (P-31057) City Attorney 26000 Evergreen Road P.O. Box 2055 Southfield Michigan, 48037-2055 (248) 796-5775 sward@cityofsouthfleld.com Attorneys for Plaintiff PLAINTIFF CITY OF SOUTHFIELD'S EX-PARTE MOTION FOR TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER

CITY OF SOUTHFIELD REQUEST FOR EX-PARTE TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER THE CITY OF SOUTHFIELD HAS A WOODLAND ORDINANCE THAT RESTRICTS THE CUTTING OF TREES. DEFENDANTS ARE PLANNING TO CUT DOWN AN ACRE AND A HALF OF TREES THAT ARE BETWEEN 100 AND 150 YEARS OLD. WITHOUT A TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER, THE DEFENDNTS ARE GOING TO BEGIN CUTTING THE TREES DOWN THIS SUNDAY, MARCH 13th THE CITY HAS A MORATORIUM ON OIL AND GAS DRILLING, YET THE DEFENDANTS WANT TO BEGIN DRILLING FOR OIL. THE PERMIT THE DEQ ISSUED DEFENDANTS WAS INPROVIDENTALY GRANTED. YET, EVEN THAT PERMIT REQUIRES THE DEFENDANTS TO COMPLY WITH THE CITY OF SOUTHFIELD'S ORDINANCES AND DEFENDANTS REFUSE. IRRERARABLE HARM WILL OCCUR IF THIS EX- PARTE TRO IS NOT GRANTED.

NOW COMES the Plaintiff, CITY OF SOUTHFIELD, (hereinafter "City") by and through its attorneys, CUMMINGS, McCLOREY, DAVIS & ACHO, P.L.C., by RONALD G. ACHO and GREGORY A. ROBERTS, and for its Ex-Parte Motion for Temporary Restraining Order, states onto this Honorable Court as follows: 1. Simultaneously with the filing of this Ex-Parte Motion, the City has filed its Verified Complaint and Claim of Appeal and Motion for a Stay and/or Preliminary Injunction. Said Verified Complaint and Motion for injunctive relief are hereby incorporated by reference. 2. On March 8, 2016, the Michigan Department of Environmental Quality issued Permit No. 61170 which allows for the drilling and operation of an oil well on the Word of Faith property in the City ofsouthfield, Michigan. (See Complaint, Exhibit 12: Permit). 3. The Plaintiff is suffering and will continue to suffer irreparable harm and injury which cannot be fully compensated at law. If the Ex-Parte Restraining Order is not granted, the City of Southfield and its residents will suffer 24 hours a day nuisance odors, nuisance noise, air and water pollution and the loss of, or harm to, one or more threatened and endangered species. (Exhibit A: Verified Complaint, Exhibit 15: Affidavit of Expert Witness, Christopher P. Grobbel). 5. Plaintiff is bringing this Motion pursuant to MCR 3.310(B)(1) and (2). As recited in the Verified Complaint and Claim of Appeal and Motion for a Stay and/or Preliminary Injunction, which are incorporated by reference hereto, Plaintiff has stated law, grounds and facts indicating a substantial likelihood they will prevail on the merits. 6. Plaintiff has no remedy at law that can ameliorate, mitigate or compensate the City for the ongoing tangible and intangible losses that will continue to accrue in the event Defendants are not enjoined from this conduct.

7. Plaintiff has contacted the attorney for Defendants Michael A. Cox, and has sent to Attorney Cox by email, the Verified Complaint and Claim of Appeal, Motion for Ex-Parte Temporary Restraining Order, and Motion for a Stay and/or Preliminary Injunction, supporting Brief. Additional steps will be taken to ensure service on the other Defendant. WHEREFORE, Plaintiff, CITY OF SOUTHFIELD, requests this Honorable Court grant an Ex-Parte Temporary Restraining Order as follows: (1) That an Ex-Parte Temporary Restraining Order be issued, staying the effect of MDEQ Permit No. 61170 until such time as the Court can hear Plaintiffs Motion for a Stay and/or Preliminary Injunction; (2) That an Ex-Parte Temporary Restraining Order be issued, and that Defendants Jordan Development Company and Word offaith Christian Church be restrained from taking any action on the permit until such time as this Court has rendered a decision on the evidence that the MDEQ's process was proper, fair and just; that the Permit should have issued; and (3) That an Ex-Parte Temporary Restraining Order be issued, and that Defendants Jordan Development Company and Word offaith Christian Church be restrained from taking any action on the permit until such time as this Court has rendered a decision on the evidence that the proposed work is subject to fair and reasonable controls that will avoid or mitigate the environmental and public health threats posed and that the anticipated nuisance will be mitigated to the extent reasonably practicable.

Respectfully submitted, Date: March 11,2016 /s/ Ronald G. Acho Ronald G. Acho (P-23913) CUMMINGS, MCCLOREY, DAVIS & ACHO, P.L.C. Attorney for Plaintiff 33900 Schoolcraft Road Livonia, MI 48150 (734) 261-2400 racho@ cmda-law.com

STATE OF MICHIGAN CITY OF SOUTHFIELD, IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR THE COUNTY OF OAKLAND Plaintiff, Case No. 2016- AA JORDAN DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, L.L.C., a limited liability company, and WORD OF FAITH CHRISTIAN CENTER CHURCH, a non-profit corporation, Hon. Defendants. -and- MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY, an agency of the State of Michigan, Defendant-Appellee. CUMMINGS, McCLOREY, DAVIS & ACHO, P.L.C. By: RONALD G. ACHO (P-23913) ELIZABETH RAE-O'DONNELL (P 41529) GREGORY A. ROBERTS (P-33984) 33900 Schoolcraft Road Livonia, MI 48150-1392 (734) 261-2400 racho@cmda-law.com erae@cmda-law.com groberts@cmda-law.com Attorneys for Plaintiff CITY OF SOUTHFIELD By: SUSAN P. WARD-WITOWSKI (P-31057) City Attorney 26000 Evergreen Road P.O. Box 2055 Southfield Michigan, 48037-2055 (248) 796-5775 sward@cityofsouthfield.com Attorneys for Plaintiff

PLAINTIFF CITY OF SOUTHFIELD'S BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF ITS EX-PARTE MOTION FOR TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER NOW COMES the Plaintiff, CITY OF SOUTHFIELD, (hereinafter "City") by and through its attorneys, CUMMINGS, McCLOREY, DAVIS & ACHO, P.L.C, by RONALD G. ACHO and GREGORY A. ROBERTS, and for its Brief in Support of its Ex-Parte Motion for Temporary Restraining Order, states onto this Honorable Court as follows: In support of this Motion, Plaintiff relies upon MCR 3.310(B)(1) and (2). Plaintiff further relies upon its Verified Complaint and Claim of Appeal and Motion for a Stay and/or Preliminary Injunction, which have been filed simultaneously with the instant Motion. Said Verified Complaint and Motion for injunctive relief are hereby incorporated by reference WHEREFORE, Plaintiff, CITY OF SOUTHFIELD, requests this Honorable Court grant an Ex-Parte Temporary Restraining Order as follows: (1) That an Ex-Parte Temporary Restraining Order be issued, staying the effect of MDEQ Permit No. 61170 until such time as the Court can hear Plaintiffs Motion for a Stay and/or Preliminary Injunction; (2) That an Ex-Parte Temporary Restraining Order be issued, and that Defendants Jordan Development Company and Word of Faith Christian Church be restrained from taking any action on the permit until such time as this Court has rendered a decision on the evidence that the MDEQ's process was proper, fair and just; that the Permit should have issued; and (3) That an Ex-Parte Temporary Restraining Order be issued, and that Defendants Jordan Development Company and Word of Faith Christian Church be restrained from taking any action on the permit until such time as this Court has rendered a decision on the

evidence that the proposed work is subject to fair and reasonable controls that will avoid or mitigate the environmental and public health threats posed and that the anticipated nuisance will be mitigated to the extent reasonably practicable. Respectfully submitted, Date: March 11, 2016 /s/ Ronald G. Acho Ronald G. Acho (P-23913) CUMMINGS, MCCLOREY, DAVIS & ACHO, P.L.C. Attorney for Plaintiff 33900 Schoolcraft Road Livonia, MI 48150 (734)261-2400 racho@cmda-law.com