Mr. President, Mr. Speaker, Members of the Congress of the United States:

Similar documents
Harry S. Truman. The Truman Doctrine. Delivered 12 March 1947 before a Joint Session of Congress

March 12, 1947 Truman Doctrine, 'Recommendations for Assistance to Greece and Turkey'

American Rhetoric: Harry S. Truman - "The Truman Doctrine" Harry S. Truman. The Truman Doctrine. Audio mp3 of Address

Introduction. Allies during World War II, the combined forces of the United States, Great Britain, France, and the Soviet Union Anatolia

OBJECTIVE 7.2 IRON CURTAIN DESCENDS THE ANALYZING THE EVENTS THAT BEGAN THE IDEOLOGICAL CONFLICT BETWEEN THE UNITED STATES AND THE SOVIET UNION

President Harry S. Truman s Address Before a Joint Session of Congress, March 12, 1947

Timeline of the Early Cold War 1945: February Yalta Conference 1945: August 6 - United States first used atomic bomb in war 1945: August 8 -

Timeline of the Early Cold War. 1945: August 6 - United States first used atomic bomb in war

Historical Debates: The Cold War

Writing Assignment #5: Who Started the Cold War?

Timeline of the Early Cold War. 1945: August 6 - United States first used atomic bomb in war. 1945: August 8 - Russia enters war against Japan

LESSON OBJECTIVE. 1.) ANALYZE the effectiveness & morality of the British Royal Air Force bombing of German civilians

Cold War Lesson Plan. Central Historical Question: Who was primarily responsible for the Cold War: The United States or the Soviet Union?

Mr. Curran*AP US History*ERHS*Mr. Saliani, Principal. DBQ Essay. Suggested reading period: 15 minutes Suggested writing period: 40 minutes

To understand how USA used financial aid to fight Communism in post-war Europe (Marshall Plan) Cold War develops. Aim:

BIG QUESTION: WHAT CAUSED THE COLD WAR?

PPT: Post WWII Tensions

The Truman Doctrine: Preventing the Spread of Communism. Andy Ziemer. Historical Paper. Junior Division. Word Count: 2095

The Cold War: Why did the United States and the USSR enter into the Cold War after World War II?

Cold War Conflicts Chapter 26

Origins of the Cold War. A Chilly Power Point Presentation Brought to You by Mr. Raffel

CHAPTER TWENTY-NINE THE COLD WAR Objectives A thorough study of Chapter 29 should enable the student to understand: 1. The background of United

Origins of the Cold War

The Origins of Cold War. Chapter 26 Section 1

TRUMAN BECOMES PRESIDENT Hopes for world peace were high at the end of the war

The Differences Between the 2 Sides Under Soviet communism, the state controlled all property & economic activity In capitalistic America, private

America after WWII. The 1946 through the 1950 s

the Cold War The Cold War would dominate global affairs from 1945 until the breakup of the USSR in 1991

The Cold War. Origins - Korean War

THE EARLY COLD WAR YEARS. US HISTORY Chapter 15 Section 2

BACKGROUND: why did the USA and USSR start to mistrust each other? What was the Soviet View? What was the Western view? What is a Cold War?

ORIGINS OF THE COLD WAR THE BERLIN BLOCKADE THE RED SCARE & MCCARTHYISM THE KOREAN WAR THE 1950S THE CUBAN MISSILE CRISES

Joint Communique On Crimea Conference

End of WWI and Early Cold War

COLD WAR ORIGINS. U.S vs. U.S.S.R. Democ./Cap vs Comm.

Ch 25-1 The Iron Curtain Falls on Europe

Harry S. Truman Inaugural Address Washington, D.C. January 20, 1949

2. The State Department asked the American Embassy in Moscow to explain Soviet behavior.

Copies of documents for students Copies of America, Pathways to the Present for background information (or some other source)

Cold War. Unit EQ: How did social, economic, and political events influence the US during the Cold War era?

4/8/2014. Other Clashes Loss of Trust: The Fate of Eastern European Nations

Cold War Containment Policies

Introduction to the Cold War

U.S. History & Government Unit 12 WWII Do Now

WINNING the WAR / PLANNING the PEACE The Allies: US, England, USSR, and China Feb 1945 Yalta Conference: US-USSR-England GERMANY must agree to

THE rece,nt international conferences

It is my duty, however, to place before you certain facts about the present position in Europe.

It is my duty, however, to place before you certain facts about the present position in Europe.

Trace the reasons that the wartime alliance between the United States and the Soviet Union unraveled.

Origins of the Cold War,

DURING WWII THE US AND THE SOVIET UNION HAD JOINED

Wartime Conferences T H E E A R L Y C O L D W A R

Extended Common Core Social Studies Lesson Plan Template

Europe and North America Section 1

Unit 11: The Cold War B A T T L E O F T H E S U P E R P O W E R S :

5. Base your answer on the map below and on your knowledge of social studies.

The Roots of the Cold War

The Cold War US vs. Union of Soviet Socialist Republics Democracy vs. Communism Capitalism vs. Socialism

The Legacies of WWII

Address broadcast by US President Harry S. Truman (9 August 1945)

Ch. 6.3 Radical Period of the French Revolution. leader of the Committee of Public Safety; chief architect of the Reign of Terror

Chapter Two Superpowers Face Off

The Rise of Dictators

The Dawn of the Cold War, The Dawn of the Cold War,

The Cold War Part I ( ) US vs. Union of Soviet Socialist Republics Democracy vs. Communism Capitalism vs.

TEACHING AMERICAN HISTORY PROJECT Lesson Title Who Was Responsible for the Start of the Cold War? From Douglas Craig

Former Allies Diverge

MARSHALL PLAN IN GREECE

Post-War Germany under Allied Occupation

Charter of the United Nations and Statute of the International Court of Justice

Statement Ьу. His Ехсеllепсу Nick Clegg Deputy Prime Minister United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland

VUS.13a. Postwar outcomes. Wars have political, economic, and social consequences.

The Common Program of The Chinese People's Political Consultative Conference, 1949

Communism. Communism is a form of economy. Everyone gets the same resources. Gov t owns the means of production -so no individuals own the businesses

The Two World Wars and the Peace Settlements

Charter United. Nations. International Court of Justice. of the. and Statute of the

CHARTER OF THE UNITED NATIONS

Section 3. Objectives

Origins of the Cold War

The Hot Days of the Cold War

AGGRESSORS INVADE NATIONS SECTION 4, CH 15

29. Security Council action regarding the terrorist attacks in Buenos Aires and London

TEKS 8C: Calculate percent composition and empirical and molecular formulas. The Age of Napoleon

Clash of Philosophies: 11/10/2010

Chapter 37: The Cold War Begins As you read, take notes using this guide. The most significant names/terms are highlighted.

Adam Smith and Government Intervention in the Economy Sima Siami-Namini Graduate Research Assistant and Ph.D. Student Texas Tech University

Nationalism movement wanted to: UNIFICATION: peoples of common culture from different states were joined together

Standard Standard

THE EASTERN EUROPE AND THE USSR

Undergraduate Student 5/16/2004 COMM/POSC Assignment #4 Presidential Radio Speech: U.S.-Russian Peacekeeping Cooperation in Bosnia

Bell Work. Describe Truman s plan for. Europe. How will his plan help prevent the spread of communism?

Beginnings of the Cold War

The Nazi Retreat from the East

Origins of the Cold War. A Chilly Power Point Presentation Brought to You by Ms. Shen

World War II Ends Ch 24-5

It is my duty, however, to place before you certain facts about the present position in Europe.

A/HRC/22/L.13. General Assembly. United Nations

Red Scare and Cold War Policies SSUSH 20 a-b

White Paper of the Interagency Policy Group's Report on U.S. Policy toward Afghanistan and Pakistan INTRODUCTION

Unit 3.1 Appeasement and World War II

Transcription:

Harry S Truman's Address before a Joint Session of Congress (March 12, 1947) On February 21, 1947, Great Britain informed U.S. State Department officials that Britain could no longer provide financial support to the governments of Greece and Turkey. U.S. policymakers had been monitoring Greece's crumbling economic and political conditions and had also been following events in Turkey, where a weak government faced Soviet pressure to share control of the strategic Dardanelle Straits. When Britain announced that it would withdraw aid to Greece and Turkey, the responsibility was passed on to the United States. In a meeting between members of Congress and State Department officials, Undersecretary of State Dean Acheson articulated what would later become known as the domino theory. Acheson stated that more was at stake than Greece and Turkey, for if those two key nations should fall, communism would likely spread. The stunned legislators agreed to endorse a program of financial assistance to those countries on the condition that President Harry Truman stress the severity of the crisis in an address to Congress and in a radio broadcast to the American people. Addressing a joint session of Congress on March 12, 1947, Truman requested $400 million in military and economic assistance for Greece and Turkey. On a broader level, he established a doctrine, generally known as the Truman Doctrine, that would guide U.S. diplomatic efforts for decades to come. Mr. President, Mr. Speaker, Members of the Congress of the United States: The gravity of the situation which confronts the world today necessitates my appearance before a joint session of the Congress. The foreign policy and the national security of this country are involved. One aspect of the present situation, which I wish to present to you at this time for your consideration and decision, concerns Greece and Turkey. The United States has received from the Greek Government an urgent appeal for financial and economic assistance. Preliminary reports from the American Economic Mission now in Greece and reports from the American Ambassador in Greece corroborate the statement of the Greek Government that assistance is imperative if Greece is to survive as a free nation. I do not believe that the American people and the Congress wish to turn a deaf ear to the appeal of the Greek Government. Greece is not a rich country. Lack of sufficient natural resources has always forced the Greek people to work hard to make both ends meet. Since 1940, this industrious and peace loving country has suffered invasion, four years of cruel enemy occupation, and bitter internal strife. When forces of liberation entered Greece they found that the retreating Germans had destroyed virtually all the railways, roads, port facilities, communications, and merchant marine. More than a thousand villages had been burned. Eighty-five per cent of the children were tubercular. Livestock, poultry, and draft animals had almost disappeared.

Inflation had wiped out practically all savings. As a result of these tragic conditions, a militant minority, exploiting human want and misery, was able to create political chaos which, until now, has made economic recovery impossible. Greece is today without funds to finance the importation of those goods which are essential to bare subsistence. Under these circumstances the people of Greece cannot make progress in solving their problems of reconstruction. Greece is in desperate need of financial and economic assistance to enable it to resume purchases of food, clothing, fuel and seeds. These are indispensable for the subsistence of its people and are obtainable only from abroad. Greece must have help to import the goods necessary to restore internal order and security, so essential for economic and political recovery. The Greek Government has also asked for the assistance of experienced American administrators, economists and technicians to insure that the financial and other aid given to Greece shall be used effectively in creating a stable and self-sustaining economy and in improving its public administration. The very existence of the Greek state is today threatened by the terrorist activities of several thousand armed men, led by Communists, who defy the government's authority at a number of points, particularly along the northern boundaries. A Commission appointed by the United Nations Security Council is at present investigating disturbed conditions in northern Greece and alleged border violations along the frontier between Greece on the one hand and Albania, Bulgaria, and Yugoslavia on the other. Meanwhile, the Greek Government is unable to cope with the situation. The Greek army is small and poorly equipped. It needs supplies and equipment if it is to restore the authority of the government throughout Greek territory. Greece must have assistance if it is to become a self-supporting and self-respecting democracy. The United States must supply that assistance. We have already extended to Greece certain types of relief and economic aid but these are inadequate. There is no other country to which democratic Greece can turn. No other nation is willing and able to provide the necessary support for a democratic Greek government. The British Government, which has been helping Greece, can give no further financial or economic aid after March 31. Great Britain finds itself under the necessity of reducing or liquidating its commitments in several parts of the world, including Greece. We have considered how the United Nations might assist in this crisis. But the situation is an urgent one requiring immediate action and the United Nations and its related organizations are not in a position to extend help of the kind that is required. It is important to note that the Greek Government has asked for our aid in utilizing

effectively the financial and other assistance we may give to Greece, and in improving its public administration. It is of the utmost importance that we supervise the use of any funds made available to Greece; in such a manner that each dollar spent will count toward making Greece self-supporting, and will help to build an economy in which a healthy democracy can flourish. No government is perfect. One of the chief virtues of a democracy, however, is that its defects are always visible and under democratic processes can be pointed out and corrected. The Government of Greece is not perfect. Nevertheless it represents eightyfive per cent of the members of the Greek Parliament who were chosen in an election last year. Foreign observers, including 692 Americans, considered this election to be a fair expression of the views of the Greek people. The Greek Government has been operating in an atmosphere of chaos and extremism. It has made mistakes. The extension of aid by this country does not mean that the United States condones everything that the Greek Government has done or will do. We have condemned in the past, and we condemn now, extremist measures of the right or the left. We have in the past advised tolerance, and we advise tolerance now. Greece's neighbor, Turkey, also deserves our attention. The future of Turkey as an independent and economically sound state is clearly no less important to the freedom-loving peoples of the world than the future of Greece. The circumstances in which Turkey finds itself today are considerably different from those of Greece. Turkey has been spared the disasters that have beset Greece. And during the war, the United States and Great Britain furnished Turkey with material aid. Nevertheless, Turkey now needs our support. Since the war Turkey has sought financial assistance from Great Britain and the United States for the purpose of effecting that modernization necessary for the maintenance of its national integrity. That integrity is essential to the preservation of order in the Middle East. The British government has informed us that, owing to its own difficulties can no longer extend financial or economic aid to Turkey. As in the case of Greece, if Turkey is to have the assistance it needs, the United States must supply it. We are the only country able to provide that help. I am fully aware of the broad implications involved if the United States extends assistance to Greece and Turkey, and I shall discuss these implications with you at this time. One of the primary objectives of the foreign policy of the United States is the creation of conditions in which we and other nations will be able to work out a way of life free from coercion. This was a fundamental issue in the war with Germany and Japan. Our victory

was won over countries which sought to impose their will, and their way of life, upon other nations. To ensure the peaceful development of nations, free from coercion, the United States has taken a leading part in establishing the United Nations. The United Nations is designed to make possible lasting freedom and independence for all its members. We shall not realize our objectives, however, unless we are willing to help free peoples to maintain their free institutions and their national integrity against aggressive movements that seek to impose upon them totalitarian regimes. This is no more than a frank recognition that totalitarian regimes imposed on free peoples, by direct or indirect aggression, undermine the foundations of international peace and hence the security of the United States. The peoples of a number of countries of the world have recently had totalitarian regimes forced upon them against their will. The Government of the United States has made frequent protests against coercion and intimidation, in violation of the Yalta agreement, in Poland, Rumania, and Bulgaria. I must also state that in a number of other countries there have been similar developments. At the present moment in world history nearly every nation must choose between alternative ways of life. The choice is too often not a free one. One way of life is based upon the will of the majority, and is distinguished by free institutions, representative government, free elections, guarantees of individual liberty, freedom of speech and religion, and freedom from political oppression. The second way of life is based upon the will of a minority forcibly imposed upon the majority. It relies upon terror and oppression, a controlled press and radio; fixed elections, and the suppression of personal freedoms. I believe that it must be the policy of the United States to support free peoples who are resisting attempted subjugation by armed minorities or by outside pressures. I believe that we must assist free peoples to work out their own destinies in their own way. I believe that our help should be primarily through economic and financial aid which is essential to economic stability and orderly political processes. The world is not static, and the status quo is not sacred. But we cannot allow changes in the status quo in violation of the Charter of the United Nations by such methods as coercion, or by such subterfuges as political infiltration. In helping free and independent nations to maintain their freedom, the United States will be giving effect to the principles of the Charter of the United Nations. It is necessary only to glance at a map to realize that the survival and integrity of the Greek nation are of grave importance in a much wider situation. If Greece should fall under the control of an armed minority, the effect upon its neighbor, Turkey, would be immediate and serious. Confusion and disorder might well spread throughout the entire

Middle East. Moreover, the disappearance of Greece as an independent state would have a profound effect upon those countries in Europe whose peoples are struggling against great difficulties to maintain their freedoms and their independence while they repair the damages of war. It would be an unspeakable tragedy if these countries, which have struggled so long against overwhelming odds, should lose that victory for which they sacrificed so much. Collapse of free institutions and loss of independence would be disastrous not only for them but for the world. Discouragement and possibly failure would quickly be the lot of neighboring peoples striving to maintain their freedom and independence. Should we fail to aid Greece and Turkey in this fateful hour, the effect will be far reaching to the West as well as to the East. We must take immediate and resolute action. I therefore ask the Congress to provide authority for assistance to Greece and Turkey in the amount of $400,000,000 for the period ending June 30, 1948. In requesting these funds, I have taken into consideration the maximum amount of relief assistance which would be furnished to Greece out of the $350,000,000 which I recently requested that the Congress authorize for the prevention of starvation and suffering in countries devastated by the war. In addition to funds, I ask the Congress to authorize the detail of American civilian and military personnel to Greece and Turkey, at the request of those countries, to assist in the tasks of reconstruction, and for the purpose of supervising the use of such financial and material assistance as may be furnished. I recommend that authority also be provided for the instruction and training of selected Greek and Turkish personnel. Finally, I ask that the Congress provide authority which will permit the speediest and most effective use, in terms of needed commodities, supplies, and equipment, of such funds as may be authorized. If further funds, or further authority, should be needed for purposes indicated in this message, I shall not hesitate to bring the situation before the Congress. On this subject the Executive and Legislative branches of the Government must work together. This is a serious course upon which we embark. I would not recommend it except that the alternative is much more serious. The United States contributed $341,000,000,000 toward winning World War II. This is an investment in world freedom and world peace. The assistance that I am recommending for Greece and Turkey amounts to little more than 1 tenth of 1 per cent of this investment. It is only common sense that we should safeguard this investment and make sure that it was not in vain.

The seeds of totalitarian regimes are nurtured by misery and want. They spread and grow in the evil soil of poverty and strife. They reach their full growth when the hope of a people for a better life has died. We must keep that hope alive. The free peoples of the world look to us for support in maintaining their freedoms. If we falter in our leadership, we may endanger the peace of the world and we shall surely endanger the welfare of our own nation. Great responsibilities have been placed upon us by the swift movement of events. I am confident that the Congress will face these responsibilities squarely.