Case 1:14-cv WTL-MJD Document 1 Filed 02/12/14 Page 1 of 5 PageID #: 1

Similar documents
Case 1:14-cv JMS-MJD Document 1 Filed 01/09/14 Page 1 of 8 PageID #: 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

1. The Plaintiff, Richard N. Bell, took photograph of the Indianapolis Skyline in

Case: 4:13-cv Doc. #: 1 Filed: 08/01/13 Page: 1 of 15 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI

Case 1:11-cv REB Document 1 Filed 12/15/11 Page 1 of 5

Case: 1:13-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 07/09/13 Page 1 of 7 PageID #:1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Case 1:18-cv JMS-MJD Document 1 Filed 06/11/18 Page 1 of 8 PageID #: 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION

Case 1:18-cv Document 1 Filed 04/26/18 Page 1 of 10 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION

Case 1:06-cv DFH-TAB Document 11 Filed 05/24/06 Page 1 of 8 PageID #: 24

Case 8:18-cv Document 1 Filed 08/07/18 Page 1 of 26 Page ID #:1

Case 2:15-cv Document 1 Filed 04/06/15 Page 1 of 14 Page ID #:1

Case 2:18-cv JAD-CWH Document 1 Filed 12/21/18 Page 1 of 17

COMPLAINT. Plaintiff, The Green Pet Shop Enterprises, LLC ( Green Pet Shop or. Plaintiff ), by and through its attorneys, THE RANDO LAW FIRM P.C.

Case 3:14-cv L Document 1 Filed 06/18/14 Page 1 of 6 PageID 1

Case 1:18-cv TWP-DML Document 1 Filed 01/06/18 Page 1 of 10 PageID #: 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION

Case: 2:10-cv GLF-NMK Doc #: 1 Filed: 12/06/10 Page: 1 of 8 PAGEID #: 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS GALVESTON DIVISION

Case 3:18-cv BAJ-RLB Document 1 08/17/18 Page 1 of 12 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA

Case 1:18-cv RGS Document 1 Filed 04/30/18 Page 1 of 16 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS

Case 2:15-cv Document 1 Filed 04/14/15 Page 1 of 7 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION

Case 6:14-cv JDL Document 1 Filed 01/15/14 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF OREGON PORTLAND DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA

Case: 1:13-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 01/24/13 Page 1 of 14 PageID #:1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION

Case 2:15-cv JMA-AKT Document 1 Filed 05/13/15 Page 1 of 7 PageID #: 1

Case: 1:14-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 03/26/14 Page 1 of 23 PageID #:1

Courthouse News Service

Case 9:16-cv RLR Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/15/2016 Page 1 of 6

Case 1:08-cv Document 1 Filed 10/13/2008 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION

Case 1:15-cv CW Document 2 Filed 01/16/15 Page 1 of 5

Case 3:17-cv JCH Document 1 Filed 11/13/17 Page 1 of 12 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT. Case No.

Case: 1:12-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 10/02/12 Page 1 of 5 PageID #:1

Case 1:18-cv BLW Document 1 Filed 01/17/18 Page 1 of 10

Case 1:17-cv Document 1 Filed 08/30/17 Page 1 of 13 PageID #: 1. No.: Defendants.

Case 2:15-cv Document 1 Filed 06/19/15 Page 1 of 5 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, WESTERN DIVISION. Case No. COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES, RESTITUTION AND INJUNCTIVE RELIEF

Case 2:15-cv JRG Document 1 Filed 07/08/15 Page 1 of 5 PageID #: 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA CASE NO:

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. Plaintiff Case No.: 1:17-cv-6236 COMPLAINT

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Case 6:13-cv MHS Document 1 Filed 03/01/13 Page 1 of 7 PageID #: 1

Case 1:16-cv Document 1 Filed 12/02/16 Page 1 of 5 PageID #: 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA CHARLOTTE DIVISION Civil Action No.: 3:17-CV-398.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION ORIGINAL COMPLAINT

Case 1:13-cv SS Document 1 Filed 09/11/13 Page 1 of 10 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS AUSTIN DIVISION

USDC IN/ND case 2:16-cv JVB-JEM document 62 filed 04/05/18 page 1 of 12

Case 2:16-cv Document 1 Filed 12/09/16 Page 1 of 8 PageID #: 1

Case 5:15-cv RWS Document 1 Filed 07/14/15 Page 1 of 12 PageID #: 1

Case 2:07-cv RCJ-GWF Document 1 Filed 12/26/2007 Page 1 of 6

Case 6:18-cv Document 1 Filed 01/31/18 Page 1 of 9 PageID #: 1

Case 3:14-cv B Document 8-2 Filed 03/11/14 Page 1 of 24 PageID 68 EXHIBIT B

Case 1:14-cv RGS Document 1 Filed 08/01/14 Page 1 of 16

Case 3:12-cv L-BH Document 43 Filed 04/29/14 Page 1 of 8 PageID 611

Case 2:12-cv JRG-RSP Document 1 Filed 08/02/12 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 1

Case 1:17-cv Document 1 Filed 04/25/17 Page 1 of 12 PageID #: 1. Plaintiffs, COMPLAINT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

Case 2:16-cv Document 1 Filed 12/09/16 Page 1 of 8 PageID #: 1

Case 2:15-cv Document 1 Filed 04/14/15 Page 1 of 12 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION

Case: 5:09-cv DDD Doc #: 1 Filed: 06/04/09 1 of 5. PageID #: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION

Case 2:13-cv RAJ Document 1 Filed 08/30/10 Page 1 of 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION

Case BLS Doc 134 Filed 05/25/18 Page 1 of 19 IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

Case: 1:12-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 06/12/12 Page 1 of 7 PageID #:1

Case: 1:11-cv DAP Doc #: 1 Filed: 01/19/11 1 of 9. PageID #: 1

Case: 1:16-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 02/12/16 Page 1 of 16 PageID #:1

Case3:15-cv Document1 Filed07/10/15 Page1 of 12

USDC IN/ND case 1:18-cv document 1 filed 04/09/18 page 1 of 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA FORT WAYNE DIVISION

Case 6:15-cv Document 1 Filed 01/13/15 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION COMPLAINT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Case 1:16-cv GAO Document 1 Filed 07/29/16 Page 1 of 13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS COMPLAINT AND JURY DEMAND PARTIES

Case 2:18-cv HCM-RJK Document 1 Filed 07/03/18 Page 1 of 5 PageID# 1

Case 2:11-cv CW Document 2 Filed 03/11/11 Page 1 of 9

Case 2:16-cv JRG-RSP Document 1 Filed 10/19/16 Page 1 of 8 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

Case 5:14-cv HE Document 1 Filed 10/20/14 Page 1 of 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA

Case 6:14-cv JDL Document 1 Filed 01/21/14 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 1

Case 6:15-cv Document 1 Filed 04/06/15 Page 1 of 5 PageID #: 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION

Case: 1:17-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 03/08/17 Page 1 of 14 PageID #:1

Case 1:11-cv JEM Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 10/06/2011 Page 1 of 14 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

Case 1:10-cv JLT Document 1 Filed 01/22/2010 Page 1 of 15 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS

Case 2:17-cv Document 1 Filed 01/12/17 Page 1 of 7 PageID #: 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) COMPLAINT

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TEXARKANA DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT

thejasminebrand.com SO SO DEF PRODUCTIONS, INC., thejasminebrand.com

Case 2:15-cv SVW-AS Document 1 Filed 02/12/15 Page 1 of 15 Page ID #:1

Case 2:16-cv RWS Document 1 Filed 10/14/16 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 1

Case 5:16-cv RWS-CMC Document 1 Filed 01/29/16 Page 1 of 7 PageID #: 1

Case 1:16-cv UNA Document 1 Filed 03/31/16 Page 1 of 5 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA

Case 1:15-cv JMS-MJD Document 177 Filed 06/30/17 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 891

Case: 3:14-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 01/13/14 Page 1 of 6 PageID #:1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS WESTERN DIVISION

case 4:12-cv RLM-APR document 10 filed 02/27/12 page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA LAFAYETTE DIVISION

Case 2:07-cv CM-JPO Document 1 Filed 07/30/2007 Page 1 of 12 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION ORIGINAL COMPLAINT

other things, the United States Patent Laws, 35 U. S. C. section 10, et seq.

Transcription:

Case 1:14-cv-00206-WTL-MJD Document 1 Filed 02/12/14 Page 1 of 5 PageID #: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA INDIANAPOLIS DIVISION NOBLE ROMAN S, INC. Plaintiff, v. CAUSE NO. 1:14-cv-206 B & MP, LLC, and LESLIE PERDRIAU, JURY TRIAL DEMANDED Defendants. COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES Plaintiff, Noble Roman s, Inc., for its claim for relief against the Defendants, B & MP, LLC and Leslie Perdriau, alleges and states: I. Parties 1. Plaintiff, Noble Roman s, Inc. ( Noble Roman s, is an Indiana corporation with its principal place of business located in Indianapolis, Marion County, Indiana. 2. Noble Roman s is in the business of franchising the operation of Noble Roman s pizza franchises that feature pizza, breadsticks, and other related food items to various franchisees throughout the world. 3. Defendant, B & MP, LLC, is an Illinois Limited Liability Company with its principal place of business in Bloomingdale, Ilinois. All members of B & MP, LLC were citizens of Illinois. B & MP, LLC was involuntarily dissolved in 2011, and Defendant Leslie Perdriau, an individual residing in Apple River, Illinois, succeeded to its obligations. B & MP, LLC and Leslie Perdriau are hereinafter referred to collectively as B & MP. Defendants are citizens of Illinois.

Case 1:14-cv-00206-WTL-MJD Document 1 Filed 02/12/14 Page 2 of 5 PageID #: 2 II. Jurisdiction and Venue 4. Noble Roman s brings this action pursuant to 15 U.S.C. 1114 and 1125 and under common law. 5. This Court has subject matter jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. 1331, 1332(a(2, 1337 and 1338. The parties are diverse in citizenship pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1332 and the amount in controversy, exclusive of interest and costs, is in excess of $75,000. 6. Venue is proper in this Court under 28 U.S.C. 1391(b(2 because a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred in the Southern District of Indiana. 7. The Court has personal jurisdiction over B & MP under Fed. R. Civ. Pr. 4(k(1(A and Indiana Trial Rule 4.4(A. III. Facts Applicable to All Claims 8. Noble Roman s registered the Noble Roman s word mark on the Principal Register of the United States Patent and Trademark Office in 1974 under Registration No. 987,069, THE BETTER PIZZA PEOPLE word mark in 1995 under Registration No. 1,920,428, and the design mark: on the Principal Register of the United States Patent and Trademark Office in 1992 under Registration No. 1682308 (collectively, the Marks. The registrations are valid and incontestable and enjoy the statutory presumptions of validity and ownership. 2

Case 1:14-cv-00206-WTL-MJD Document 1 Filed 02/12/14 Page 3 of 5 PageID #: 3 9. Noble Roman s has used the Marks in commerce continuously since 1972 in connection with marketing, identifying, and promoting its pizza franchises. 10. On or about March 16, 2010, Noble Roman s and B & MP entered into two Franchise Agreements (the Agreements, true and accurate copies of which are attached hereto as Exhibits A and B. Under the terms of the Agreements, B & MP became a franchisee of Noble Roman s licensed and authorized to sell Noble Roman s and Tuscano s branded food products using Noble Roman s licensed intellectual property assets, subject to the obligations in the Agreements, including but not limited to accurate reporting of sales and timely payment of franchise and other fees. 11. B & MP has breached the Agreement by failing to pay royalties as required under the Agreement and by misreporting sales, among other things. 12. B & MP has purposely, intentionally and knowingly misreported its sales to Noble Roman s for the purpose of avoiding payment of franchise fees and/or royalties which are justly owing. IV. Count One (Trademark Infringement 13. Noble Roman s incorporates herein by reference the allegations in paragraphs 1-12 in this Complaint as if fully alleged herein. 14. B & MP has used the Marks in commerce and in connection with the sale of non- Noble Roman s pizza and other menu items. 15. B & MP s use of the Marks is without the authorization or consent of Noble Roman s, and outside the scope of permission granted in the Agreement. 16. B & MP s acts constitute trademark infringement, a violation of 15 U.S.C. 1114(1, as well as a false designation of origin in violation of 15 U.S.C. 1125. 3

Case 1:14-cv-00206-WTL-MJD Document 1 Filed 02/12/14 Page 4 of 5 PageID #: 4 17. Noble Roman s has been damaged by B & MP s willful infringement and false designation of origin in an amount to be proven at trial. V. Count One (Breach of Contract 18. Noble Roman s incorporates herein by reference the allegations in paragraphs 1-17 in this Complaint. 19. All conditions precedent to the commencement of this action including but not limited to any requirements for notice of default or demand have occurred or been waived or otherwise excused. 20. The Agreements are valid and enforceable contracts between the parties. 21. Noble Roman s has performed all obligations and terms of the Agreements on its part to be performed. 22. B & MP has knowingly breached the Agreements by failing to report its sales to Noble Roman s for the purpose of avoiding payment of franchise fees and/or royalties which are justly owing. 23. Noble Roman s has been damaged by B & MP s breach of the Agreements in an amount to be proven at trial, and in excess of $75,000. 24. Under the terms of the Agreements, in addition to compensatory damages for breach of the Agreements, B & MP is liable for interest, costs of collection, and reasonable attorney fees. VI. Count Two (Fraud 25. Noble Roman s incorporates herein by reference the allegations in paragraphs 1-24 in this Complaint. 4

Case 1:14-cv-00206-WTL-MJD Document 1 Filed 02/12/14 Page 5 of 5 PageID #: 5 26. As a result of B & MP s intentional and willful misreporting of its sales to Noble Roman s, B & MP is liable for punitive or exemplary damages in an amount sufficient to punish B & MP and deter similar conduct in the future. WHEREFORE, Plaintiff, Noble Roman s, Inc., by counsel prays for judgment in its favor and against the Defendants, B & MP, LLC and Leslie Perdriau, in amount to be proven at trial, together with interest, punitive damages, cost of collection and reasonable attorney fees, and for all other relief right and proper in the premises. Dated this 12 th day of February, 2014. Respectfully submitted, /s/ Steven K. Huffer Steven K. Huffer, Atty. No. 8459-49 S.K. HUFFER & ASSOCIATES, P.C. 12821 East New Market Street, Suite 250 Carmel, IN 46032 Telephone: (317 564-4808 Facsimile: (317 564-4812 Email: steveh@hufferlaw.com Attorney for Plaintiff, Noble Roman s, Inc. DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL Noble Roman s demands a jury trial for all issues that may be tried to a jury. Respectfully submitted, Date: February 12, 2014 /s/ Steven K. Huffer Steven K. Huffer (IN Atty. No. 8459-49 S.K. HUFFER & ASSOCIATES, P.C. 12821 East New Market Street, Suite 250 Carmel, IN 46032 Phone: 317-564-4808 Fax: 317-564-4812 Email: steveh@hufferlaw.com Attorney for Plaintiff, Noble Roman s, Inc. 5