Sklar v New York Hosp. Queens 2010 NY Slip Op 32312(U) August 16, 2010 Supreme Court, Nassau County Docket Number: 4146/10 Judge: Denise L.

Similar documents
M.V.B. Collision Inc. v Kirchner 2012 NY Slip Op 31284(U) May 1, 2012 Sup Ct, Nassau County Docket Number: 12373/11 Judge: Denise L.

Reid v Incorporated Vil. of Floral Park 2011 NY Slip Op 31762(U) June 21, 2011 Supreme Court, Nassau County Docket Number: 1981/11 Judge: Denise L.

Sato Constr. Co., Inc. v 17 & 24 Corp NY Slip Op 32508(U) September 7, 2010 Supreme Court, Nassau County Docket Number: 7690/10 Judge: Stephen

Matter of Roehrig v Baranello 2010 NY Slip Op 31783(U) July 8, 2010 Supreme Court, Nassau County Docket Number: 20868/09 Judge: Denise L.

ARSR Solutions, LLC v 304 E. 52nd St. Hous. Corp NY Slip Op 30315(U) January 23, 2012 Supreme Court, Nassau County Docket Number:

Geraci-Yee v Freeport Union Free School Dist NY Slip Op 33340(U) November 22, 2010 Supreme Court, Nassau County Docket Number: 10503/06 Judge:

YDRA, LLC v Mitchell 2013 NY Slip Op 33832(U) March 5, 2013 Supreme Court, Queens County Docket Number: 20692/11 Judge: Bernice D.

Matter of Sheil v Melucci 2011 NY Slip Op 31242(U) April 28, 2011 Supreme Court, Nassau County Docket Number: 20552/10 Judge: Denise L.

Spencer v Sabeno 2011 NY Slip Op 31628(U) June 8, 2011 Supreme Court, Nassau Coutny Docket Number: 141/11 Judge: Denise L. Sher Republished from New

Reilly v Garden City Union Free School Dist NY Slip Op 32871(U) December 1, 2009 Supreme Court, Nassau County Docket Number: 9968/09 Judge:

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK. Defendant. The followine papers have been read on this motion:

Matter of Schroko v County of Nassau 2010 NY Slip Op 33341(U) November 22, 2010 Supreme Court, Nassau County Docket Number: 14145/10 Judge: Denise L.

Vera v Tishman Interiors Corp NY Slip Op 31724(U) September 16, 2016 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: /2015 Judge: Robert D.

Ariale v City of New York 2019 NY Slip Op 30629(U) March 8, 2019 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: /2014 Judge: Lyle E.

Cohan v Movtady 2012 NY Slip Op 33256(U) January 24, 2012 Sup Ct, New York County Docket Number: 2845/11 Judge: Denise L. Sher Cases posted with a

Matter of Ferencik v Board of Educ. of the Amityville Union Free School Dist NY Slip Op 33486(U) December 8, 2010 Sup Ct, Nassau County Docket

Wood v Long Is. Pipe Supply, Inc NY Slip Op 30384(U) February 5, 2010 Supreme Court, Nassau County Docket Number: Judge: Timothy S.

Onilude v City of New York 2015 NY Slip Op 32176(U) October 8, 2015 Supreme Court, Bronx County Docket Number: /2009 Judge: Wilma Guzman Cases

Devlin v Mendes & Mount, LLP 2011 NY Slip Op 33823(U) July 1, 2011 Sup Ct, Queens County Docket Number: 31433/10 Judge: Denis J. Butler Cases posted

Rieders v Kahn 2012 NY Slip Op 32117(U) August 1, 2012 Sup Ct, Nassau County Docket Number: 14142/10 Judge: Denise L. Sher Republished from New York

Hirani Eng'g & Land Surveying, P.C. v Long Is. Bus. Solutions, Inc NY Slip Op 30970(U) April 1, 2011 Supreme Court, Nassau County Docket

Weitz v Weitz 2012 NY Slip Op 30767(U) March 19, 2012 Sup Ct, Nassau County Docket Number: Judge: Timothy S. Driscoll Republished from New

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK. Defendants. The followine papers have been read on this motion:

Desai v Azran 2010 NY Slip Op 31421(U) June 2, 2010 Supreme Court, Nassau County Docket Number: 12629/09 Judge: Randy Sue Marber Republished from New

Hahn v Congregation Mechina Mikdash Melech, Inc NY Slip Op 31517(U) July 11, 2013 Sup Ct, Kings County Docket Number: /2012 Judge: Mark

Savitt v Estate of Nicholas Passantino 2013 NY Slip Op 32652(U) October 11, 2013 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: /12 Judge: Doris

Baron v Mason 2010 NY Slip Op 31695(U) June 30, 2010 Supreme Court, Nassau Court Docket Number: 02869/08 Judge: Randy Sue Marber Republished from New

Garcia v City of New York 2014 NY Slip Op 30364(U) February 10, 2014 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: /2010 Judge: Kathryn E.

Burnett v Pourgol 2010 NY Slip Op 30250(U) January 26, 2010 Supreme Court, Nassau County Docket Number: 13130/09 Judge: Stephen A.

Okoli v Paul Hastings LLP 2012 NY Slip Op 33539(U) September 14, 2012 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: /12 Judge: Cynthia S.

Shi v Shaolin Temple 2011 NY Slip Op 33821(U) July 1, 2011 Sup Ct, Queens County Docket Number: 20167/09 Judge: Denis J. Butler Cases posted with a

Platinum Rapid Funding Group Ltd. v VIP Limousine Servs., Inc NY Slip Op 31591(U) June 8, 2016 Supreme Court, Nassau County Docket Number:

Matter of Bethpage Fed. Credit Union v John 2011 NY Slip Op 31652(U) April 19, 2011 Supreme Court, Nassau County Docket Number: 20089/10 Judge:

Legum v Russo 2014 NY Slip Op 33694(U) October 23, 2014 Supreme Court, Nassau County Docket Number: Judge: James P. McCormack Cases posted

Sieger v Zak 2010 NY Slip Op 33045(U) October 19, 2010 Supreme Court, Nassau County Docket Number: 19978/05 Judge: Stephen A. Bucaria Republished

46th St. Dev., LLC v Marsh USA Inc NY Slip Op 33888(U) August 15, 2011 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: /2010 Judge: Eileen

Pielet Bros. Contr. v All City Glass'n Mirro-1964UA, LLC 2015 NY Slip Op 31045(U) June 18, 2015 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number:

Cohen v Kachroo 2013 NY Slip Op 30416(U) February 22, 2013 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: /10 Judge: Eileen A.

Blassberger v Varela 2013 NY Slip Op 34105(U) December 11, 2013 Supreme Court, Nassau County Docket Number: 2856/12 Judge: Denise L.

Tesoro v Metropolitan Swimming, Inc NY Slip Op 32769(U) October 25, 2018 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: /2017 Judge:

Taboola, Inc. v Aitken 2016 NY Slip Op 31340(U) July 14, 2016 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: /2015 Judge: Ellen M.

Fulton Commons Care Ctr. v Belth 2010 NY Slip Op 32533(U) September 9, 2010 Supreme Court, Nassau County Docket Number: Judge: Timothy S.

Maggio v Town of Hempstead 2015 NY Slip Op 32647(U) June 1, 2015 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: Judge: James P.

Concepcion v JetBlue Airways Corp NY Slip Op 30474(U) March 30, 2015 Sup Ct, Queens County Docket Number: /2014 Judge: Robert J.

Matter of Sullivan v Board of Appeals of the Town of Hempstead 2018 NY Slip Op 33441(U) December 10, 2018 Supreme Court, Nassau County Docket Number:

Orkal Indus. v Array Connector Corp NY Slip Op 31370(U) May 16, 2011 Supreme Court, Nassau County Docket Number: /2010 Judge: Ira B.

The Law Offs. of Ira L. Slade, P.C. v Singer 2018 NY Slip Op 33179(U) December 10, 2018 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: /2018

Barnett v City of New York 2015 NY Slip Op 30190(U) January 15, 2015 Supreme Court, Bronx County Docket Number: /2011 Judge: Sharon A.M.

Benavides v Chase Manhattan Bank 2011 NY Slip Op 30219(U) January 26, 2011 Sup Ct, New York County Docket Number: /09 Judge: Debra A.

Felsen v Stop & Shop Supermarket Co., LLC 2010 NY Slip Op 32291(U) August 12, 2010 Supreme Court, Nassau County Docket Number: 1149/09 Judge: Thomas

Matz v Aboulafia Law Firm, LLC 2017 NY Slip Op 32147(U) October 10, 2017 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: /2016 Judge: Kathryn E.

Majuste v Jamaica Hosp. Med. Ctr NY Slip Op 31745(U) May 6, 2014 Sup Ct, Queens County Docket Number: /13 Judge: Kevin J.

Paiba v FJC Sec., Inc NY Slip Op 30384(U) February 27, 2015 Supreme Court, Bronx County Docket Number: /2012 Judge: Mary Ann Brigantti

Minuto v Longo 2013 NY Slip Op 31683(U) July 25, 2013 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: /09 Judge: Cynthia S. Kern Republished from

SHORT FORM ORDER SUPREME COURT-STATE OF NEW YORK PRESENT: HON. BRUCE D. Plaintiff,

Kyung Rim Choi v Han Ik Cho 2014 NY Slip Op 33920(U) July 21, 2014 Supreme Court, Nassau County Docket Number: Judge: Timothy S.

Matter of Sosa v New York City Health & Hosps. Corp NY Slip Op 33949(U) September 27, 2012 Supreme Court, Kings County Docket Number: /12

Re-Poly Mfg. Corp., v Anton Dragonides 2011 NY Slip Op 31107(U) April 15, 2011 Supreme Court, Queens County Docket Number: 17688/09 Judge: Janice A.

Garnett v Fox Horan & Camerini LLP 2010 NY Slip Op 32163(U) August 11, 2010 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: /08 Judge: Jane S.

Koch v Blit 2013 NY Slip Op 30620(U) March 15, 2013 Sup Ct, New York County Docket Number: /11 Judge: Joan A. Madden Republished from New York

Atria Retirement Props., L.P. v Bradford 2012 NY Slip Op 33460(U) August 22, 2012 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: /11 Judge:

Kaplan v Conway & Conway 2018 NY Slip Op 32178(U) September 4, 2018 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: /17 Judge: Frank P.

Nai Hua Li v Super 8 Worldwide,Inc NY Slip Op 32812(U) November 20, 2012 Supreme Court, Richmond County Docket Number: /2012 Judge:

Love v BMW of N. Am., LLC 2017 NY Slip Op 30528(U) February 21, 2017 Supreme Court, Richmond County Docket Number: /16 Judge: Kim Dollard Cases

Spector v Wender 2011 NY Slip Op 31089(U) March 30, 2011 Sup Ct, Nassau County Docket Number: 3615/10 Judge: F. Dana Winslow Republished from New

Cohen v Hoschander 2018 NY Slip Op 32882(U) November 8, 2018 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: /2017 Judge: Kathryn E.

Walsh v Double N Equip. Rental Corp NY Slip Op 33536(U) December 10, 2014 Supreme Court, Queens County Docket Number: 10572/2010 Judge: Robert

Simpson v Alter 2011 NY Slip Op 31765(U) June 21, 2011 Supreme Court, Nassau County Docket Number: 11095/09 Judge: Thomas P. Phelan Republished from

: : Plaintiff James Tagliaferri, acting pro se, sues Matthew J. Szulik and Kyle M. Szulik

Defendant( s). MOTION SEQ. No. 5-

Frydman v Francese 2017 NY Slip Op 31069(U) May 15, 2017 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: /2015 Judge: Cynthia S.

QK Healthcare, Inc. v Insource, Inc NY Slip Op 31092(U) April 12, 2011 Sup Ct, Nassau County Docket Number: Judge: Timothy S.

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK. Respondents. The followine papers have been read on these motions:

Axa Equit. Life Ins. Co. v 200 E. 87th St. Assoc., L.P NY Slip Op 30069(U) January 4, 2019 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number:

Neiditch v William Penn Life Ins. Co. of N.Y NY Slip Op 32757(U) April 24, 2015 Supreme Court, Nassau County Docket Number: /14 Judge:

Herczi v Katan 2010 NY Slip Op 33052(U) October 25, 2010 Sup Ct, Nassau County Docket Number: Sup Ct, Nassau County Judge: Timothy S.

Matter of Kroynik v New York State Office of Temporary & Disability Assistance 2013 NY Slip Op 30912(U) April 25, 2013 Sup Ct, New York County Docket

American Express Bank. FSB v Thompson 2018 NY Slip Op 33162(U) December 3, 2018 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: /2016 Judge:

Choi v Korowitz 2013 NY Slip Op 33944(U) August 15, 2013 Supreme Court, Queens County Docket Number: /11 Judge: Bernice D. Siegal Cases posted

Griffin v Perrotti 2013 NY Slip Op 33777(U) September 11, 2013 Supreme Court, Westchester County Docket Number: 70095/2012 Judge: William J.

Lee v Dow Jones & Co., Inc NY Slip Op 30535(U) January 15, 2014 Supreme Court, Bronx County Docket Number: /13 Judge: Wilma Guzman Cases

Daniel Perla Assoc., L.P. v Cathedral Church of St. Lucy's 2011 NY Slip Op 30761(U) March 17, 2011 Supreme Court, Nassau County Docket Number:

Barone v Barone 2013 NY Slip Op 34095(U) May 6, 2013 Supreme Court, Queens County Docket Number: 9162/2012 Judge: Orin R. Kitzes Cases posted with a

Lattarulo v Industrial Refrig., Inc NY Slip Op 32423(U) May 22, 2018 Supreme Court, Nassau County Docket Number: /17 Judge: Thomas

Baturone v Gracie Square Hosp NY Slip Op 33433(U) September 26, 2012 Sup Ct, New York County Docket Number: /2012 Judge: Anil C.

Kaback Enters., Inc. v Oxford Constr. Dev., Inc NY Slip Op 33722(U) December 27, 2010 Sup Ct, NY County Docket Number: /10 Judge: Paul

State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v Austin Diagnostic Med., P.C NY Slip Op 30917(U) April 18, 2016 Supreme Court, Queens County Docket Number:

Beys v MMM Group, LLC 2016 NY Slip Op 30619(U) April 11, 2016 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: Judge: George J.

Michael Alan Group, Inc. v Rawspace Group, Inc NY Slip Op 30055(U) January 3, 2019 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: /2017

Mimosa Equities Corp. v ACJ Assoc. LLC 2014 NY Slip Op 33181(U) December 4, 2014 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: /2014 Judge:

Plaintiff, Defendants.

Archer v Port Auth. of N.Y. & N.J NY Slip Op 31380(U) April 25, 2014 Supreme Court, Queens County Docket Number: /13 Judge: Augustus C.

Siegel v Engel Burman Senior Hous. at E. Meadow, LLC 2010 NY Slip Op 33833(U) October 21, 2010 Sup Ct, Nassau County Docket Number: 6709/09 Judge:

L.Y.E. Diamonds Ltd. v Gemological Inst. of Am., Inc NY Slip Op 32576(U) December 7, 2017 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number:

Caeser v Harlem USA Stores, Inc NY Slip Op 30722(U) April 18, 2016 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: /2013 Judge: Anil C.

Flowers v District Council 37 AFSCME 2015 NY Slip Op 31435(U) July 20, 2015 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: /13 Judge: Lynn R.

Gonzalez v Schlau 2011 NY Slip Op 31048(U) April 12, 2011 Supreme Court, Queens County Docket Number: 8960/2009 Judge: Robert J. McDonald Republished

Ching Chou Wu v Troy 2013 NY Slip Op 31547(U) July 12, 2013 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: /2013 Judge: Eileen A.

Lugo v City of New York 2013 NY Slip Op 30267(U) January 29, 2013 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: /2010 Judge: Kathryn E.

Barahona v City of New York 2013 NY Slip Op 30232(U) January 28, 2013 Sup Ct, New York County Docket Number: /2010 Judge: Kathryn E.

Transcription:

Sklar v New York Hosp. Queens 2010 NY Slip Op 32312(U) August 16, 2010 Supreme Court, Nassau County Docket Number: 4146/10 Judge: Denise L. Sher Republished from New York State Unified Court System's E-Courts Service. Search E-Courts (http://www.nycourts.gov/ecourts) for any additional information on this case. This opinion is uncorrected and not selected for official publication.

[* 1] CCl,J SHORT FORM ORDER SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK PRESENT: HON. DENISE L. SHER Acting Supreme Court Justice ROD SKLAR TRIAL/IAS PART 32 NASSAU COUNTY - against - NEW YORK HOSPITAL QUEENS, KRISTEN ERNST KEVIN CAMPBELL and MARCIA LEVINE Plaintiff Index No. : 4146/10 Motion Seq. Nos. : 01 Motion Dates: 04/22/1 06/04/1 0 Defendants. The following papers have been read on these motions: Notice of Motion Memorandum of Law and Exhibit Notice of Cross-Motion. Affrmation and Exhibits Reply Memorandum of Law in Further Support of Motion to Dismiss and in Opposition to Cross-Motion Papers Numbered Upon the foregoing papers, it is ordered that the motion is decided as follows: Defendants move, pursuant to CPLR 99 321 (a)(7) and 3016(a), for an order dismissing plaintiffs complaint in its entirety, with prejudice, for failure to state a viable cause of action. Plaintiff cross-moves for an order permitting him to serve an amended complaint. Defendants oppose plaintiffs cross-motion. Defendants submit that "(ajccording to Plaintiff on or about October 6 2009 defendants stated defamatory statements regarding plaintiff including, but not limited to plaintiff harassed Marcia Levine, and plaintiff violated a ' New York Hospital Queens

[* 2], ' Harassment Policy,' such that he was terminated, from defendant New York Hospital Queens Employment (sic)...plaintiff does not provide the specific words used in these two statements. Plaintiff does not provide the time, place or maner in which these statements were allegedly made or published. Plaintiff does not indicate which defendant(s) made or published these statements and to whom. Plaintiff attributes these two statements to ' defendants' even though there are three individual defendants Plaintiff also alleges that on or about October 13, 2009 Defendant's (sic) stated that plaintiff threatened the (sic) he was going to ' come in with a gun and kil everyone. ' Plaintiff does not provide the time, place or maner in which these statements were allegedly made or published. Plaintiff does not indicate which defendant(s) made or published these statements and to whom. Plaintiff attributes this one statement to defendant' ' even though there are three individual defendants. Plaintiff furher states the ' the words published, written and/or spoken by defendants Kristen Ernst, Kevin Campbell, and Marcia Levine were stated as part oftheir offcial duties. Defendants argue that plaintiff s defamation claim must be dismissed because he has failed to satisfy the pleading requirements ofcplr 9 3016(a). In order to state a claim for defamation, a plaintiff must allege; (1) an oral or written false statement, (2) published without privilege or authorization to a third par, (3) constituting fault as judged by, at a minimum, a negligence standard, which (4) causes special har or constitutes defamation per se. Defendants contend that plaintiff has utterly failed to plead his defamation claim with the requisite paricularity and, therefore, his complaint must be dismissed. Defendants submitthat plaintiff failed to identify the persons to whom the October 6 2009 and October 13 2009 statements were allegedly made, nor does he even set forth by whom the statements were made. Plaintiff

[* 3] additionally fails to specify the time, place or maner in which said statements were allegedly made. With respect to the October 6, 2009 statement, plaintiff fails to set forth the particular words of the alleged statement. Plaintiff fails to ariculate the precise words about which he is complaining, but rather he sets forth his allegations in general and conclusory fashion. Defendants further argue that plaintiff s defamation claim must be dismissed because he has failed to sufficiently plead special damages. As plaintiff does not allege that any of the allegedly defamatory statements constitute defamation per se his complaint can only survive if he sufficiently pleads special damages. Defendants assert that plaintiff has failed to do so. Defendants submit that, in order to state a claim for defamation, special damages must be alleged with suffcient particularity to identify actual losses and be related to the alleged tortuous act. In the present action, plaintiffs original complaint states "(b)y reason of the foregoing plaintiff has suffered special damages and has been injured in his reputation and in said workplace, and has effected (sic) plaintiff physically. Plaintiff has been damaged in this sum that exceeds jurisdictional limits of lower courts." Defendants argue that this is insufficient in that plaintiff s vague allegation of injury or loss to his reputation is not suffcient to satisfy the requirement of pleading special damages, nor is his generalized allegation that his damages exceed the "jurisdictional limits of lower courts. In opposition, plaintiff states that "(t)he original Summons and Complaint specifies the defamatory words. Nonetheless, in an effort to assure the summons and complaint falls with in case law Plaintiff has cross moved to amend the complaint. The plaintiff is now able to allege with specificity the time, location, speaker, and exact words of the defamatory statements. Plaintifftherefore submits that he has a cause of action against New York Hospital Queens,

[* 4] Kristen Ernst, Kevin Campbell and Marcia Levine for defamation....it is respectfully submitted that there is no prejudice to defendant by allowing plaintiff to amend the complaint to reflect the addition of more specific allegation and permitting plaintiff to serve same. Defendants oppose plaintiffs cross-motion to amend his complaint. Defendants state that "(i)n response to Defendants' motion, Plaintiff failed to submit any opposition whatsoever thereby conceding that his Complaint is deficient. Instead, Plaintiff fied a cross-motion, seeking leave from the Court to file an amended complaint, which, presumably he believes wil address the multitude of deficiencies in his original Complaint." Defendants submit that " (p)laintiffs attempt to salvage his claim is futile. Plaintiffs claims remain deficient and...should be dismissed. " Defendants argue that plaintiff s new allegations are without merit. Defendants contend that, while plaintiffs proposed changes do provide additional details regarding the alleged defamatory statements, he stil fails to set forth sufficient allegations to state a claim for defamation. Defendants contend that plaintiff s new allegations provide additional grounds for dismissal of the claim and that plaintiff s bare boned allegations also fail to state a claim for negligence per se. Defendants state that "(r)ather than cure the deficiencies in Plaintiffs initial Complaint the Proposed Complaint provides further grounds for dismissal, as the October 6 Statement and the October 11 th Statements are subject to a qualified privilege... courts have recognized a qualified privilege for communications ' made by one person to another upon a subject in which both have an interest.'... This ' common interest' privilege has been applied to communications between ' employees of an organization. ", Defendants argue that " (t)he allegedly defamatory statements that Plaintiff attributes to Defendants are precisely the kind of statements that are

[* 5], "... subject to the qualified privilege. First, all of the alleged statements were made solely to, and in the presence of, co-employees ofnyhq...second, the statements unequivocally concerned a matter of common interest to Ms. Ernst, Ms. Levine, Ms. Campbell, and Plaintiff, as coemployees ofnyhq, allegations concerning Plaintiffs sexual harassment of a co-worker uttering of violent statements, and policy violations in the workplace...thus because the only recipients ofthese alleged communications were NYHQ employees, and because the topic of these communications concerned a matter of common interest to such employees, these statements are, as a matter of law, protected by a qualified privilege and canot form the basis for a defamation claim. Defendants furher submit that once a qualified privilege applies, the allegedly defamatory statement is not actionable unless the plaintiff can produce proof in evidentiar form that the defendant acted with malice in making the statements. Defendants state that plaintiff has utterly failed to satisfy this burden. "In his Complaint and Proposed Complaint, Plaintiff does not offer a single factual allegation that could support his conclusory allegations that Defendants knew that the allegedly defamatory statements were false (or likely false), or that Defendants sole motivation for making such statements was spite il wil. Rather, he provides nothing more than conclusory allegations of malice, based on his own surise and conjecture. With respect to their argument that plaintiff failed to adequately plead special damages Defendants add that (i)n his Proposed Complaint, Plaintiff attempts to address this deficiency by adding additional allegations. Specifically, Plaintiff now alleges that he ' lost income of $100 000 per year and lost benefits of $50 000' rather than simply that he had been ' injured and damaged in the sum that exceeds the jurisdictional limits of all lower courts. ", Plaintiffs vague allegation of injur and seemingly random selection of $1 00 000. 00 and $50 000.00 as his

[* 6]... alleged damages is stil not sufficient to satisfy the requirement of pleading special damages. Plaintiff has not itemized his alleged loss and therefore has not sufficiently pled special damages. Furhermore, lost income does not qualify as special damages. Lastly, defendants submit that "(i)n Count II of the Proposed Complaint, Plaintiff attempts to assert, for the first time, a claim of negligence per se. This claim is similarly without merit. Indeed, Plaintiff fails to set forth any of the required elements of a claim for negligence per se. Even if plaintiff had stated a claim for negligence per se his claim is bared as against defendant New York Hospital Queens by the exclusivity provision of the New York Worker s Compensation Laws. In determining a motion to dismiss pursuant to CPLR 321 (a)(7) for plaintiffs alleged failure to state a cause of action/to state a claim upon which relief could be granted, the court wil afford the complaint a liberal construction, accept the facts contained therein as true, accord plaintiff every favorable inference and determine only whether the facts as alleged fit within any cognizable legal theory. See Leon v. Martinez 84 N. Y.2d 83, 614 N. Y.S.2d 972 (1994); Fay Estates v. Toys "R" Us, Inc. 22 AD.3d 712 803 N. Y.S.2d 135 (2d Dept. 2005); Collns Telcoa, International Corp. 283 AD.2d 128, 726 N. S.2d 679 (2d Dept. 2001). A motion for leave to serve an amended pleading wil only be denied where the amendment is wholly devoid of merit or is significantly prejudicial to the non-moving party. See Norman v. Ferrara 107 AD.2d 739, 484 N. Y.S. 2d 600 (2d Dept.985). The merits of the proposed amended pleading wil not be reviewed "... unless the insufficiency or lack of merit is clear and free from doubt." Id at 740, 741. The Cour finds that this is a case where plaintiffs proposed amendment's lack of merit is clear and free from doubt. It is evident from defendants ' arguments that plaintiff, in both his

[* 7] "-.... \ /. ":;:-- - ' /',?' original complaint as well as his proposed amended complaint, has failed to meet the pleading requirements of a defamation claim, failed to sufficiently plead special damages and failed to meet the pleading requirements of negligence per se. As stated previously, a motion for leave to amend must be denied where the cour finds that the proposed amendment lacks merit. See Giovinco v. Giovinco 276 AD.2d 469, 713 N. Y.S. 2d 700 (2d Dept. 2000); Bonnen v. Chin Hua Chiang, 272 AD.2d 357, 707 N. Y.S. 2d 365 (2d Dept. 2000); McKiernan v. McKiernan 207 AD.2d 825 616 N.Y.S.2d 629 (2d Dept. 1994). Since plaintiffs proposed amended complaint lacks merit, his cross-motion (Motion Sequence No. 02) for leave to amend is hereby denied. Consequently, defendants' motion (Motion Sequence No. 01) for an order dismissing plaintiffs original complaint in its entirety, with prejudice, for failure to state a viable cause of action is hereby granted. This constitutes the decision and order of this Court. f." A.' C) rr; /; C/1:. DENISE L. SHER, A. Dated: Mineola, New York August 16, 2010 ENTE F:D AUG 19 2010 NASSAU COUh I '( COUNTY CLERK' S OFFICE