U.S.-Russian Relations: A Statement

Similar documents
U.S.-Russian Relations: The Longer View

THE TWO REPORTS PUBLISHED IN THIS DOCUMENT are the

The 2015 NPT Review Conference and the Future of the Nonproliferation Regime Published on Arms Control Association (

Implications of the Indo-US Growing Nuclear Nexus on the Regional Geopolitics

Introduction to the Cold War

Russia and the United Kingdom in the Changing World

American. National Security. Policy. Elements of National Security. Policy American National Security. Policy

Mikhail Gorbachev s Address to Participants in the International Conference The Legacy of the Reykjavik Summit

NATO and the Future of Disarmament

nations united with another for some common purpose such as assistance and protection

CONFRONTING STATE CAPTURE IN MOLDOVA

Revising NATO s nuclear deterrence posture: prospects for change

The United States & South Asia: New Possibilities. It is an honor to appear before the Senate Foreign

Lesson Title: Working for Nuclear Disarmament- Understanding the Present Status

Non-Proliferation and the Challenge of Compliance

Origins of the Cold War. A Chilly Power Point Presentation Brought to You by Ms. Shen

STATEMENT OF WALTER F. MONDALE

Power Politics Economics Independence. Unit 10:The World Divides 8 days (block) Unit Title Pacing. Unit Overview

Protecting Our History


COMMEMORATION OF THE 5OTH ANNIVERSARY OF THE CONCLUSION OF THE TREATY ON THE NON-PROLIFERATION OF NUCLEAR WEAPONS (NPT)

China s Uncertain Future. Laura DiLuigi. 19 February 2002

17 th Republic of Korea-United Nations Joint Conference on Disarmament and Non-proliferation Issues:

Russian and East European Studies in Sweden: New Challenges and Possibilities

2009 Diplomatic White Paper

Russia in a Changing World: Continued Priorities and New Opportunities

How Must America Practice Diplomacy?

U.S.-Russia Relations Back from the Brink

Russia s New Euro- Atlanticism

Security Forum: Experience Sharing between Baltic and Black Sea Regions

STRUCTURING SECURITY Dialogue and Arms Control in the OSCE Area

The EU and Russia: our joint political challenge

PERMANENT MISSION OF THAILAND TO THE UNITED NATIONS 351 EAST 52 nd STREET NEW YORK, NY TEL (212) FAX (212)

The United States and Russia in the Greater Middle East

For the fourth time in history and the second time this decade, Mexico has been

Origins of the Cold War. A Chilly Power Point Presentation Brought to You by Ms. Shen

Nuclear Stability in Asia Strengthening Order in Times of Crises. Session III: North Korea s nuclear program

World War III, or a Worldwide Renaissance? Why the West Must Collaborate with BRICS for the Common Aims of Mankind

Report on 2012 China-U.S. Security Perceptions Project

Concepts (understandings)

Democracy Promotion in Eurasia: A Dialogue

APPENDICES.

U.S.-Russia Relations. a resource for high school and community college educators. Trust and Decision Making in the Twenty-First Century

Historical Debates: The Cold War

"Status and prospects of arms control, disarmament and non-proliferation from a German perspective"

UNIDIR RESOURCES IDEAS FOR PEACE AND SECURITY. The CD and PAROS A Short History April 2011

Topic 5: The Cold War. Kissinger Chapter 23: Khrushchev s Ultimatum: The Berlin Crisis

Dr. Sameh Aboul-Enein Budapest, June, 2012

Russians Support Putin's Re-Nationalization of Oil, Control of Media, But See Democratic Future

Statement of Dennis C. Blair before The Senate Select Committee on Intelligence United States Senate January 22, 2009

NPT/CONF.2020/PC.II/WP.33

Multilateralism and Canadian Foreign Policy: A Reassessment

Independent India, , witnessed a new phenomenon

JAPAN-RUSSIA-US TRILATERAL CONFERENCE ON THE SECURITY CHALLENGES IN NORTHEAST ASIA

Group of Eight Declaration on Nonproliferation and Disarmament for 2012

Lessons from the Cold War,

CHINA IN THE WORLD PODCAST. Host: Paul Haenle Guest: Su Hao

Nuclear Nonproliferation Policy of the Russian Federation

CHECK AGAINST DELIVERY

Americans and Russians Agree on Priorities for Syria, Differ on Urgency of North Korea

Changing Contours of India-US Relations: Perceptions, Continuity and Change

"The Enlargement of the EU: Impact on the EU-Russia bilateral cooperation"

Cold War Lesson Plan. Central Historical Question: Who was primarily responsible for the Cold War: The United States or the Soviet Union?

$100 People. WWII and Cold War. The man who made demands at Yalta who led to the dropping of the "iron curtain" around the eastern European countries.

Remarks by Ms. Izumi Nakamitsu at the opening meeting of the 72nd session of the First Committee of the General Assembly

NATO Background Guide

Ukraine s Integration in the Euro-Atlantic Community Way Ahead

Propose solutions to challenges brought on by modern industrialization and globalization.

Conflict and Cooperation in South Asia: Role of Major Powers

AGORA ASIA-EUROPE. Regional implications of NATO withdrawal from Afghanistan: What role for the EU? Nº 4 FEBRUARY Clare Castillejo.

STATEMENT By Mr. Gideon Frank, Director General Israel Atomic Energy Commission At the International Atomic Energy Agency 47 th General Conference

Timeline of the Early Cold War. 1945: August 6 - United States first used atomic bomb in war

Campaigning in the Eastern European Borderlands

Lessons from the Agreed Framework with North Korea and Implications for Iran: A Japanese view

Understanding diplomacy: The act of negotiating with foreign countries

The U.S. National Security Strategy released in December 2017 identifies China and Russia as key

Second Comprehensive Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty Science Diplomacy Symposium. High Level Session. [Keynote Speech]

Lawyers Committee on Nuclear Policy. Law s Imperative: A World Free of Nuclear Weapons

Course Overview Course Length Materials Prerequisites Course Outline

Timeline of the Early Cold War 1945: February Yalta Conference 1945: August 6 - United States first used atomic bomb in war 1945: August 8 -

KAZAKHSTAN STATEMENT BY H.E. MR. KANAT SAUDABAYEV

HILLARY S RECORD OF LEADERHIP

TRANSATLANTIC RELATIONS SINCE 1945

and the United States fail to cooperate or, worse yet, actually work to frustrate collective efforts.

Propaganda and Challenges to the Russian Regime

Inter-Parliamentary Union President, Ms Gabriela Cuevas Barron, Distinguished parliamentarians, Ladies and gentlemen,

CASE ANALYSIS. Russia s Shifting Strategy in Syria: Implications. for Turkish Foreign Policy

NORPAC Hokkaido Conference for North Pacific Issues

COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES COMMUNICATION FROM THE COMMISSION TO THE COUNCIL. Review of EU-Russia relations {SEC(2008) 2786}

THE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MULTILATERAL APPROACHES TOWARDS NUCLEAR DISARMAMENT: THE NEXT STEPS. July 3, 2009 National Hotel (Moscow)

Implementation of the JCPOA: Risks and Challenges Ahead

Modern International Relations An Elective Social Science Course for Loudoun County Public Schools

Mark Scheme (Results) January 2011

BRIDGING THE GAP BETWEEN BAN TREATY SUPPORTERS AND STEP-BY-STEP APPROACHES TO ELIMINATING NUCLEAR WEAPONS

Remarks on the Role of the United Nations in Advancing Global Disarmament Objectives

CHAPTER 20 NATIONAL SECURITY POLICYMAKING CHAPTER OUTLINE

My other good colleague here tonight is Colonel Glen Dickenson who is the Garrison Commander of our installation here in Stuttgart.

The Mediterranean Chapter of the Helsinki Final Act and the Future of Mediterranean Co-operation Tuesday, 10th November 2015, 9:30am

THE EU AND THE SECURITY COUNCIL Current Challenges and Future Prospects

Transcription:

U.S.-Russian Relations: A Statement by nine former Ambassadors to Moscow and Washington: Ambassador Alexander A. Bessmertnykh Ambassador James F. Collins Ambassador Yuri V. Dubinin Ambassador Arthur A. Hartman Ambassador Victor G. Komplektov Ambassador Vladimir P. Lukin Ambassador Jack F. Matlock, Jr. Ambassador Thomas R. Pickering Ambassador Yuli M. Vorontsov

A New Century of U.S.-Russia Relations This year marks an important anniversary. In 1807, the Russian Empire and the young American Republic agreed to establish diplomatic relations. Soon after Russia s first envoy Alexander Dashkov arrived in Washington, and John Quincy Adams traveled to St. Petersburg. Since this modest beginning, our relations at their best and worst have borne out de Tocqueville s prophecy that America and Russia each seem marked out by the will of Heaven to sway the destinies of half the globe. Today, with the Cold War and immediate post-soviet transition behind us, we face a new world in which an effective U.S.-Russian relationship remains central to addressing many global challenges. As direct descendants of those ambassadors who pioneered the bilateral conversation, we have come together on this diplomatic bicentennial at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace in Washington to reflect on the prospects for U.S.-Russian relations. We are diplomats not politicians who represent a half-century of experience of doing U.S.- Russian relations. Our careers have seen our countries face critical, at times existential, challenges. We have known the success of close cooperation when we defeated common foes and developed a safer 1

world, but also the consequences of estrangement and rivalry, which during the Cuban Missile Crisis brought us to the brink of catastrophe. Today unprecedented globalization of communications, economic dynamism, and the movement of people, goods, and ideas have broken down traditional barriers and opened our nations to new and powerful influences for positive change. But change also brings with it new threats. The threat posed by WMD proliferation, the menace of terrorism and organized crime, unprecedented stresses on our environment and energy security, and a host of unresolved and frozen regional conflicts are among the pressing issues that require joint attention. In these and many other areas, our two countries have the experience and responsibility to provide leadership. Faced with so many important tasks, we cannot afford to let miscommunication or mistrust derail our relations. When we have pursued active dialog and creative diplomacy based on agreed principles we have brought about positive change. How do we regain that relationship? What lessons have we learned? 2

First, America and Russia are two large, complex nations with different histories, geography, and cultures. These differences make it normal and inevitable that we will each see the world through the lens of our own national interests, compete in global economic and political affairs, and have legitimate disagreements. Thus the task is to identify and advance shared interests, even as we manage our differences and disagreements. As Ambassador Anatoly Dobrynin, who was instrumental in negotiating the Cuban Missile Crisis, wrote, We should be candid and not easily discouraged when our views do not coincide. From time to time our interests may even clash. But we should always be able to find a way to disagree without damaging a profoundly important strategic partnership. Second, both countries have experienced profound change in the past quarter century. The Cold War s end and the dissolution of the Soviet Union into independent states brought a sea change across Europe and Eurasia, the consequences of which continue to reverberate. Russia has entered a difficult period of economic, social, and political transformation as well as of reshaping its global and regional strategies. The U.S. has also undergone the national shock of 9-11. The emergence of violent anti-u.s. extremism poses an imminent threat to Americans everywhere, challenging traditional U.S. policies, perceptions, and priorities. 3

Third, U.S.-Russian relations work best when we avoid demonizing one another and hone in on common interests to develop shared solutions. For example, we have markedly improved our work together in combating terrorism. We must concentrate on opening new areas of cooperation in nuclear matters including prevention of WMD proliferation, which we consider a matter of paramount importance. But much remains to be done. There is growing concern that our successful arms control regime, including the verification system, may disappear, with unacceptable consequences for the world. Present disagreements about missile defense in Europe, the shape of future security structures for Europe, and how best to proceed in Kosovo have brought new tensions between us. Our diplomacy, with other international actors, must find a way forward. Fourth, as we begin our third diplomatic century, it is important to continue to rely on the power of diplomacy. As Henry Kissinger wrote, American leaders should not fear frank discussions about where American and Russian interests converge and where they differ. The same is true of Russia. Keeping our channels always open and busy spared us from nuclear annihilation in the 20th century and can help us surmount the existential threats that lie ahead. Today, in addition to regular diplomatic channels and contacts between leaders, we should explore further institutionalization of our dialog at the cabinet and sub-cabinet levels. 4

Finally, we need a wider conversation between our societies to strengthen the foundation of shared values. Encouraging the broadest possible open contacts among scientific, social, and religious organizations is equally important. To this end, our visa systems should facilitate exchange rather than hinder it. Expanding our economic ties can also promote a more stable and predictable relationship. We must move beyond the WTO issue and remove politically motivated barriers that have held up U.S.-Russian commercial exchange so that Russia takes its place as a full member of the global trading community. Our two countries have already proven themselves able to bridge wide political and cultural gaps. We can now work together in the broad context of democratic values and market economics. Today the U.S. and Russia need to build a well-defined new strategic framework for productive diplomacy to resolve old problems and meet new challenges. Our future work should be worthy of a third diplomatic century. 5