Amended Complaint, Gassman v. Frischholtz et al, Docket No. 1:05-cv (Northern District of Illinois 2005)

Similar documents
Second Amended Complaint, Gassman v. Frischholtz et al, Docket No. 1:05-cv (Northern District of Illinois 2005)

Case 1:16-cv Document 1 Filed 11/21/16 Page 1 of 10 PageID #: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT STATE OF RHODE ISLAND COMPLAINT INTRODUCTION

Case 1:16-cv Document 1 Filed 11/21/16 Page 1 of 9 PageID #: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT STATE OF RHODE ISLAND COMPLAINT INTRODUCTION

FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT

Case: 1:13-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 07/25/13 Page 1 of 7 PageID #:1

Complaint, Kristofek v. Richard Yanz, et al, Docket No. 1:12-cv (Northern District of Illinois Oct 17, 2012)

Case: 1:15-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 02/03/15 Page 1 of 10 PageID #:1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS, WESTERN DIVISION

Amended Complaint, Weiner v. Prairie Park, Docket No. 1:16-cv (N.D. Ill. 2016)

)(

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Complaint, Joly v. Town of Lake Hunting and Fishing Club Inc, Docket Nos. 2:05-cv-02223, 2:06-cv (Central District of Illinois 2006)

Case: 1:06-cv JRA Doc #: 28 Filed: 05/08/09 1 of 9. PageID #: 220

Case: 1:12-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 05/25/12 Page 1 of 24 PageID #:1

Case 1:18-cv RDB Document 1 Filed 07/30/18 Page 1 of 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND BALTIMORE DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA

Case: 1:14-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 02/18/14 Page 1 of 15 PageID #:1

Case: 1:16-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 02/12/16 Page 1 of 16 PageID #:1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA

3:14-cv SEM-TSH # 1 Page 1 of 10 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS SPRINGFIELD DIVISION

Case 1:13-cv JG-JMA Document 1 Filed 04/29/13 Page 1 of 18 PageID #: 1

NATURE OF THE ACTION. This is an action under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended by the

Case: 1:17-cv Document #: 11 Filed: 04/18/17 Page 1 of 26 PageID #:51

CASE NO. 5:00-CV COMPLAINT IN INTERVENTION ON BEHALF OF JACKQULINE STOKES

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF BUTTE UNLIMITED JURISDICTION

Case 2:16-cv JTM-TJJ Document 1 Filed 05/25/16 Page 1 of 11 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS

Case 2:17-cv JAM-EFB Document 1 Filed 10/31/17 Page 1 of 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) NATURE OF THE ACTION

-CIVIL RIGHTS EMPLOYMENT

Case 0:12-cv RSR Document 7 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/18/2012 Page 1 of 15

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT! WESTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN! SOUTHERN DIVISION!

Case: 5:15-cv SL Doc #: 1 Filed: 07/20/15 2 of 9. PageID #: 2

Case: 1:11-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 07/19/11 Page 1 of 10 PageID #:1

Case 3:18-cv JSC Document 1 Filed 05/02/18 Page 1 of 11

Case 4:16-cv JEG-CFB Document 1 Filed 12/23/16 Page 1 of 13

Case 4:07-cv JLH Document 1 Filed 06/29/2007 ( Page 1 of 6

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION

Case3:05-cv WHA Document1 Filed02/14/05 Page1 of 5

Case 4:10-cv CW Document 1 Filed 10/13/10 Page 1 of 8

2:18-cv PDB-EAS Doc # 1 Filed 03/06/18 Pg 1 of 16 Pg ID 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION CASE NO.

Filing # E-Filed 06/13/ :25:39 PM

Case 3:14-cv MLC-DEA Document 6 Filed 07/15/14 Page 1 of 9 PageID: 30

Case 3:11-cv CRW-TJS Document 1 Filed 04/06/11 Page 1 of 7

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIVIL DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

Case: 1:15-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 01/23/15 Page 1 of 10 PageID #:1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TAMPA DIVISION

Case: 1:14-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 02/10/14 Page 1 of 15 PageID #:1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Courthouse News Service

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Case: 4:15-cv BYP Doc #: 1 Filed: 03/11/15 1 of 18. PageID #: 1

Case 1:15-cv KMW Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 10/13/2015 Page 1 of 9

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA PENSACOLA DIVISION NATURE OF THE ACTION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Case: 1:16-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 11/15/16 Page 1 of 8 PageID #:1

Case 1:17-cv Document 1 Filed 02/03/17 Page 1 of 15 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

COMPLAINT (Jury Trial Demand)

Case 5:19-cv HNJ Document 1 Filed 01/14/19 Page 1 of 20

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO

Case 5:15-cv SAC-KGS Document 1 Filed 08/06/15 Page 1 of 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION

Courthouse News Service

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF ALAMEDA UNLIMITED JURISDICTION

9:12-cv PMD-BHH Date Filed 09/17/12 Entry Number 1 Page 1 of 8

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI NORTHERN DIVISION V. CAUSE NO.: COMPLAINT (JURY TRIAL DEMANDED)

Case: 1:18-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 08/29/18 Page 1 of 10 PageID #:1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION

Case: 1:10-cv Document #: 1-2 Filed: 06/03/09 Page 1 of 5 PageID #:2

Case: 1:16-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 12/15/16 Page 1 of 15 PageID #:1

Filing # E-Filed 06/09/ :22:25 PM

Case 1:14-cv KAM-JO Document 8 Filed 07/02/14 Page 1 of 11 PageID #: 36

From Article at GetOutOfDebt.org

Case 3:08-cv CRW-CFB Document 1 Filed 11/07/2008 Page 1 of 12

Case: 1:17-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 03/09/17 Page 1 of 6 PageID #:1

Case: 1:12-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 06/12/12 Page 1 of 7 PageID #:1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION

2. One of the defendant in the case is Parker & Gould (P&G). What is exactly P&G?

Case 5:09-cv JMH Document 1 Filed 10/26/2009 Page 1 of 10

Case 2:11-cv CW Document 2 Filed 03/11/11 Page 1 of 9

Case 1:18-cv JTN-ESC ECF No. 7 filed 06/11/18 PageID.30 Page 1 of 12

Case 1:18-cv UNA Document 1 Filed 11/28/18 Page 1 of 11 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

Case 3:04-cv JSW Document 168 Filed 10/20/2005 Page 1 of 5 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN

Case: 1:13-cv Document #: 15 Filed: 01/27/14 Page 1 of 16 PageID #:29

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS GALVESTON DIVISION. Plaintiffs, CIVIL ACTION NO. v.

Courthouse News Service

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS

Case 8:04-cv SCB-TBM Document 32 Filed 10/07/2005 Page 1 of 6

Case: 1:17-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 05/12/17 Page 1 of 13 PageID #:1

Case 4:15-cv RLY-DML Document 1 Filed 07/17/15 Page 1 of 8 PageID #: 1

Case 3:14-cv BR Document 1 Filed 10/09/14 Page 1 of 7

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA RICHMOND DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF HAWAII CV

Case: 2:10-cv GLF-NMK Doc #: 1 Filed: 12/06/10 Page: 1 of 8 PAGEID #: 1

Case 0:08-cv JRT-FLN Document 1 Filed 01/04/2008 Page 1 of 24 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA

Case 1:11-cv NLH-KMW Document 19 Filed 06/01/12 Page 1 of 19 PageID: 196 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

Case 1:11-cv NMG Document 1 Filed 10/19/11 Page 1 of 25 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS

Case: 1:18-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 02/22/18 Page 1 of 9 PageID #:1

Transcription:

The John Marshall Law School The John Marshall Institutional Repository Court Documents and Proposed Legislation 2005 Amended Complaint, Gassman v. Frischholtz et al, Docket No. 1:05-cv-05377 (Northern District of Illinois 2005 F. Willis Caruso John Marshall Law School, 6caruso@jmls.edu John Marshall Law School Fair Housing Legal Clinic Follow this and additional works at: http://repository.jmls.edu/courtdocs Part of the Housing Law Commons Recommended Citation Amended Complaint, Gassman v. Frischholtz et al, Docket No. 1:05-cv-05377 (Northern District of Illinois 2005 http://repository.jmls.edu/courtdocs/21 This Brief is brought to you for free and open access by The John Marshall Institutional Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Court Documents and Proposed Legislation by an authorized administrator of The John Marshall Institutional Repository.

Case: 1:05-cv-05377 Document #: 14 Filed: 11/16/05 Page 1 of 12 PageID #:50 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION Debra Gassman, v. Plaintiff, Edward Frischholz, and Shoreline Towers Condominium Association, an Illinois not-for-profit corporation, Defendants. No.: 05 C 5377 Judge: Judge George W. Lindberg Magistrate: Judge Arlander Keys PlaintiffDemands Trial by Jury AMENDED COMPLAINT The Plaintiff Debra Gassman, by her attorneys F. Willis Caruso, Lewis W. Powell, III and the Senior Law Students of The John Marshall Law School Fair Housing Legal Clinic, complain of Defendants Edward Frischholz, and Shoreline Towers Condominium Association an Illinois not-for-profit corporation; as follows: JURISDICTION 1. This action arises under 42 U.S.C. 1982, 42 U.S.C. 3601 et seq.; and The Illinois Condominium Act 765 ILCS 605/1 18.4B. 2. Jurisdiction is conferred on this Court by 28 U.S.C. 1331, 1343(a and 2201, and 42 U.S.C. 3613(a. 3. Venue is proper in the Northern District of Illinois, Eastern Division since Plaintiff and Defendants reside within the boundaries thereof. PARTIES 4. Plaintiff, Debra Gassman, is a Jewish American, female citizen of the United States who is the owner of and resides at 6301 North Sheridan Road unit 12P, Chicago, Illinois 60660 ("Subject Property".

Case: 1:05-cv-05377 Document #: 14 Filed: 11/16/05 Page 2 of 12 PageID #:51 5. Defendant, Edward Frischholz, on information and belief, is a Caucasian/White male citizen of the United States, and at all times relevant hereto resided at 6301 North Sheridan Road and is made a party to this action for his individual acts. He continues to be the President of the Shoreline Towers' Board of Directors and sometimes acts for and on behalf of the Association. 6. Defendant Shoreline Towers Association is a not-for-profit corporation of Illinois and a condominium association located at 6301 North Sheridan Road Chicago, IL 60660. FACTS RELEVANT TO ALL COUNTS 7. Commencing during or about May 2004 and continuing to the date hereof Defendants, Edward Frischholz, and Shoreline Towers Condominium Association intimidated, threatened, and interfered with Ms. Gassman by consistently removing and prohibiting Ms. Gassman from placing a Mezuzah (a religious parchment encased in a small tube essential to observing Jewish Religion on the exterior of the Subject Property doorway. 8. Commencing during or about June 2004 and continuing to the date hereof, Defendants continued and continue to prevent the Ms. Gassman from placing a Mezuzah on the exterior of the Subject Property doorway, despite Jewish law requiring that Mezuzah be placed on the outside of the door of Jewish residences. 9. Commencing during or about May 2004, Defendants ordered the Mezuzah on the Subject Property to be removed to facilitate the repainting of the condominium hallway. The hallway painting was completed by approximately June 2004, after which Plaintiff placed the Mezuzah back on her door. 10. Contemporaneously, Defendants claimed that they were enforcing a condominium association by-law which purportedly prohibited anything from being placed on a doorpost in the 2

Case: 1:05-cv-05377 Document #: 14 Filed: 11/16/05 Page 3 of 12 PageID #:52 hallway of the Condominium. The claimed provision of by-law and the purported interpretation given by Defendants had not previously been so interpreted or enforced in the manner employed by Defendants, despite having been added in the year 2001. 11. Such actions deprived Ms. Gassman of the use and enjoyment of her home by infringing on her right to freely practice her religious faith. These actions were based on Ms. Gassman's status as members ofthe Jewish religion and because of race. 13. As a direct consequence of Defendants' discriminatory, retaliatory, interfering and harassing actions, Plaintiff continues to suffer emotional distress and mental anguish. 13. All of the actions of Defendants complained of herein were done willfully, maliciously with careless disregard for the rights of the Plaintiff. CLAIMS As Against Defendant Edward Frischholz Count 1: Religious and Race Discrimination Under 42 U.S.C. 3604 14. Ms. Gassman restates andre-alleges paragraphs 1 through 13 of this Complaint as though 15. The actions by Defendant are in violation of the Ms. Gassman's housing rights by discriminating in the provision of services or facilities and to make the housing otherwise unavailable in connection with the ownership and rental of a dwelling based upon Ms. Gassman's Jewish religion and race constitutes discrimination on the basis of race and religion in violation of the Fair Housing Act 42 U.S.C. 3604 (a and (b. 16. Ms. Gassman has sustained direct injuries including, but not limited to, being barred from the full use and enjoyment of Subject Property, as guaranteed by the Fair Housing Act. 17. Ms. Gassman has suffered emotional distress and mental anguish, embarrassment, 3

Case: 1:05-cv-05377 Document #: 14 Filed: 11/16/05 Page 4 of 12 PageID #:53 including prohibiting the Mezuzah from placement on the exterior doorpost of the Subject WHEREFORE, Plaintiff prays the court to enter a Temporary Restraining Order, a Preliminary Injunction and a Permanent Injunction enjoining the Defendant, Edward Frischholz from prohibiting or preventing the Mezuzah from being placed on the doorpost of the Subject Property and/or from removing or defiling the Mezuzah, and/or from causing the Mezuzah to be removed or defiled. Plaintiff also prays that the court award actual damages for Plaintiff and against Edward Frischholz for the injury to the Plaintiff, including damages for emotional distress, mental anguish, humiliation and embarrassment, punitive damages for actions done with malice or willful disregard for the rights of the Plaintiff, attorney's fees and costs and such other relief as the court may deem just and proper. Count 2: Violation of 42 U.S.C. 3617 18. Ms. Gassman restates and re-alleges paragraphs 1 through 13 of this Complaint as though 19. The actions by Defendant of intimidating, interfering with the housing rights of, and harassing Ms. Gassman by prohibiting the Mezuzah from being placed on the exterior doorpost, removing or causing to be removed the Mezuzah and defiling the Mezuzah is interference and intimidation discrimination on the basis of race and religion in violation of the Fair Housing Act, 42 U.S.C. 3617. 20. Ms. Gassman has sustained and continues to sustain direct injuries including, but not limited to, being barred from the full use and enjoyment of the Subject Property, as guaranteed by the Fair Housing Act. 4

Case: 1:05-cv-05377 Document #: 14 Filed: 11/16/05 Page 5 of 12 PageID #:54 21. Ms. Gassman has suffered emotional distress and mental anguish, embarrassment, including the prohibiting the Mezuzah from placement on the exterior doorpost of the Subject WHEREFORE, Plaintiff prays the court to enter a Temporary Restraining Order, a Preliminary Injunction and a Permanent Injunction enjoining the Defendant, Edward Frischholz from prohibiting or preventing the Mezuzah from being placed on the doorpost of the Subject Property and/or from removing or defiling the Mezuzah, and/or from causing the Mezuzah to be removed or defiled. Plaintiff also prays that the court award actual damages for Plaintiff and against Edward Frischholz for the injury to the Plaintiff, including damages for emotional distress, mental anguish, humiliation and embarrassment, punitive damages for actions done with malice or willful disregard for the rights of the Plaintiff, attorney's fees and costs and such other relief as the court may deem just and proper. Count 3: Violation of 42 U.S.C. 1982 22. Ms. Gassman restates and re-alleges paragraphs 1 through 13 of this Complaint as though 23. The actions by the Defendant Edward Frischholz of prohibiting Ms. Gassman from placing a Mezuzah on the exterior doorway of the Subject Property, being because of race, is a violation of Ms. Gassman's right of to be free from discrimination based on race in violation of 42 U.S.C. 1982. 24. The actions by the Defendant of removing or causing the removal of a Mezuzah on the exterior doorway of the Subject Property, being because of race, are violations of Ms. Gassman's right to have the same rights as enjoyed by other citizens to hold and convey real and 5

Case: 1:05-cv-05377 Document #: 14 Filed: 11/16/05 Page 6 of 12 PageID #:55 personal property in violation of 42 U.S.C 1982. 25. Ms. Gassman has suffered emotional distress and mental anguish, embarrassment, including prohibiting the Mezuzah from placement on the exterior doorpost of the Subject WHEREFORE, Plaintiff prays the court to enter a Temporary Restraining Order, a Preliminary Injunction and a Permanent Injunction enjoining the Defendant, Edward Frischholz from prohibiting or preventing the Mezuzah from being placed on the doorpost of the Subject Property and/or from removing or defiling the Mezuzah, and/or from causing the Mezuzah to be removed or defiled. Plaintiff also prays that the court award actual damages for Plaintiff and against Edward Frischholz for the injury to the Plaintiff, including damages for emotional distress, mental anguish, humiliation and embarrassment, punitive damages for actions done with malice or willful disregard for the rights of the Plaintiff, attorney's fees and costs and such other relief as the court may deem just and proper. As Against Defendant, Shoreline Towers Condominium Association Count 4: Religious Discrimination Under 42 U.S.C. 3604 26. Ms. Gassman restates andre-alleges paragraphs 1 through 13 of this Complaint as though 27. The actions by Defendant in violation of Ms. Gassman's housing rights in the provision of services or facilities in connection with the sale or rental of a dwelling based upon Ms. Gassman's Jewish religion and race constitutes discrimination on the basis of race and religion in violation of the Fair Housing Act 42 U.S.C. 3604 (a and (b. 28. Ms. Gassman has sustained direct injuries including, but not limited to, being barred from 6

Case: 1:05-cv-05377 Document #: 14 Filed: 11/16/05 Page 7 of 12 PageID #:56 the full use and enjoyment of the Subject Property, as guaranteed by the Fair Housing Act. 29. Ms. Gassman has suffered emotional distress and mental anguish, embarrassment, including prohibiting the Mezuzah from placement on the exterior doorpost of the Subject WHEREFORE, Plaintiff prays the court to enter a Temporary Restraining Order, a Preliminary Injunction and a Pennanent Injunction enjoining the Defendant, Shoreline Towers Condominium Association from prohibiting or preventing the Mezuzah from being placed on the doorpost of the Subject Property and/or from removing or defiling the Mezuzah, and/or from causing the Mezuzah to be removed or defiled. Plaintiff also prays that the court award actual damages for Plaintiff and against Shoreline Towers Condominium Association for the injury to the Plaintiff, including damages for emotional distress, mental anguish, humiliation and embarrassment, punitive damages for actions done with malice or willful disregard for the rights of the Plaintiff, attorney's fees and costs and such other relief as the court may deem just and proper. Count 5: Violation of 42 U.S.C. 3617 30. Ms. Gassman restates andre-alleges paragraphs 1 through 13 of this Complaint as though 31. The actions by Defendant of intimidating, interfering with the housing rights of, and harassing Ms. Gassman by prohibiting the Mezuzah from being placed on the exterior doorpost, is discrimination on the basis of race and religion in violation of the Fair Housing Act, 42 U.S.C. 3617. 32. Ms. Gassman has sustained and continues to sustain direct injuries including, but not 7

Case: 1:05-cv-05377 Document #: 14 Filed: 11/16/05 Page 8 of 12 PageID #:57 limited to, being barred from the full use and enjoyment of the Subject Property as guaranteed by the Fair Housing Act. 33. Ms. Gassman has suffered emotional distress and mental anguish, embarrassment, including prohibiting the Mezuzah from placement on the exterior doorpost of the Subject WHEREFORE, Plaintiff prays the court to enter a Temporary Restraining Order, a Preliminary Injunction and a Permanent Injunction enjoining the Defendant, Edward Frischholz from prohibiting or preventing the Mezuzah from being placed on the doorpost of the Subject Property and/or from removing or defiling the Mezuzah, and/or from causing the Mezuzah to be removed or defiled. Plaintiff also prays that the court award actual damages for Plaintiff and against Edward Frischholz for the injury to the Plaintiff, including damages for emotional distress, mental anguish, humiliation and embarrassment, punitive damages for actions done with malice or willful disregard for the rights of the Plaintiff, attorney's fees and costs and such other relief as the court may deem just and proper. Count 6: Violation of 42 U.S. C. 1982 34. Ms. Gassman restates and re-alleges paragraphs 1 through 13 of this Complaint as though 35. The actions by the Defendant of prohibiting Ms. Gassman from placing a Mezuzah on the exterior doorway of the Subject Property, being because of race, are a violation of Ms. Gassman's right to be protected against impairment of her rights as enjoyed by others in violation of 42 U.S.C. 1982. 36. The actions by the Defendant of removing or causing the removal of a Mezuzah from the 8

Case: 1:05-cv-05377 Document #: 14 Filed: 11/16/05 Page 9 of 12 PageID #:58 exterior doorway of the Subject Property, being because of race, are a violation of Ms. Gassman's right to have the same rights as enjoyed by white citizens to hold and convey real and personal property in violation of 42 U.S.C 1982. 37. Ms. Gassman has suffered emotional distress and mental anguish, embarrassment, including prohibiting the Mezuzah from placement on the exterior doorpost of the Subject WHEREFORE, Plaintiff prays the court to enter a T~mporary Restraining Order, a Preliminary Injunction and a Permanent Injunction enjoining the Defendant, Edward Frischholz from prohibiting or preventing the Mezuzah from being placed on the doorpost of the Subject Property and/or from removing or defiling the Mezuzah, and/or from causing the Mezuzah to be removed or defiled. Plaintiff also prays that the court award actual damages for Plaintiff and against Edward Frischholz for the injury to the Plaintiff, including damages for emotional distress, mental anguish, humiliation and embarrassment, punitive damages for actions done with malice or willful disregard for the rights of the Plaintiff, attorney's fees and costs and such other relief as the court may deem just and proper. Count 7: Violation of Illinois Condominium Act 18.4: Powers and Duties of Managers 38. Ms. Gassman restates andre-alleges paragraphs 1 through 13 ofthis Complaint as though 39. Defendant violated The Illinois Condominium Act 18.4: Powers and Duties of Managers by enforcing rules and regulations that impair Plaintiffs rights by preventing Plaintiff from freely exercising her religion and free speech. 40. Ms. Gassman has suffered emotional distress and mental anguish, embarrassment, 9

Case: 1:05-cv-05377 Document #: 14 Filed: 11/16/05 Page 10 of 12 PageID #:59 including the prohibiting the Mezuzah from placement on the exterior doorpost of the Subject WHEREFORE, Plaintiff prays the court to enter a Temporary Restraining Order, a Preliminary Injunction and a Permanent Injunction enjoining the Defendant, Edward Frischholz from prohibiting or preventing the Mezuzah from being placed on the doorpost of the Subject Property and/or from removing or defiling the Mezuzah, and/or from causing the Mezuzah to be removed or defiled. Plaintiff also prays that the court award actual damages for Plaintiff and against Edward Frischholz for the injury to the Plaintiff, including damages for emotional distress, mental anguish, humiliation and embarrassment, punitive damages for actions done with malice or willful disregard for the rights of the Plaintiffs, attorney's fees and costs and such other relief as the court may deem just and proper. Count 8: Breach of Fiduciary Duty Pursuant to 765 ILCS 605118.4 41. Ms. Gassman restates andre-alleges paragraphs 1 through 13 ofthis Complaint as though 42. At all times relevant, Defendant, was in a fiduciary relationship with Ms. Gassman. 43. Defendant Shoreline Towers Condominium Association is responsible, as principal, for the acts of its agents, employees and servant members. 44. Under Condominium Property Act, Defendant had a duty to: a. Perform its duties as an association in a reasonable manner and with due care for the welfare of Shoreline Towers Condominium's members (including Ms. Gassman and her property. b. Perform its duties as an association with due regard for the provisions and duties 10

Case: 1:05-cv-05377 Document #: 14 Filed: 11/16/05 Page 11 of 12 PageID #:60 set forth in the Condominium Property Act and the Declarations and Bylaws, conduct any investigations of complaints against Ms. Gassman in a reasonable manner; c. Perform its duties as an Association with due regard for the provisions and duties set forth in the Fair Housing Act and its regulations. d. Otherwise act in its fiduciary relationship with Ms. Gassman. 45. Defendant, Shoreline Towers Condominium Association breached its fiduciary duty to Ms. Gassman by failing in its duties owed to Ms. Gassman, by acting in a willful and wanton manner, and by engaging in bad faith and unfair dealing. 46. In addition, Defendant Shoreline Towers Condominium Association breached its fiduciary duty to Ms. Gassman when it used its particular and superior position to intimidate, and interfere with Ms. Gassman's housing rights. 47. As a direct and proximate cause of Defendant's breach of the fiduciary duty, Ms. Gassman was injured and sustained emotional distress, embarrassment and other injury and continues to suffer emotional distress, embarrassment and other injury. WHEREFORE, Plaintiff prays the court to enter a Temporary Restraining Order, a Preliminary Injunction and a Permanent Injunction enjoining the Defendant, Edward Frischholz from prohibiting or preventing the Mezuzah from being placed on the doorpost of the Subject Property and/or from removing or defiling the Mezuzah, and/or from causing the Mezuzah to be removed or defiled. Plaintiff also prays that the court award actual damages for Plaintiff and against Edward Frischholz for the injury to the Plaintiff, including damages for emotional distress, mental anguish, humiliation and embarrassment, punitive damages for actions done with malice or willful disregard for the rights of the Plaintiff, attorney's fees and costs and 11

Case: 1:05-cv-05377 Document #: 14 Filed: 11/16/05 Page 12 of 12 PageID #:61 such other relief as the court may deem just and proper. F. Willis Caruso Lewis W. Powell III Dustin DeGroote, Senior Law Student The John Marshall Law School Fair Housing Legal Clinic 28 East Jackson Boulevard Suite 500 Chicago, Illinois 60604 (312 786-2267 FAX (312 786-1047 12