Mortgage who is the mortgagee? Is the mortgagee the Plaintiff? Is the mortgagee a corporation or a trust?

Similar documents
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE SEVENTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR BROWARD COUNTY, FLORIDA,

Foreclosure Litigation Overview

RESPONDENT S AMENDED ANSWER BRIEF TO PETITIONER S JURISDICTIONAL BRIEF FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW

Case 0:16-cv WPD Document 64 Entered on FLSD Docket 01/19/2017 Page 1 of 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

In the District Court of Appeal Second District of Florida

Foreclosure Actions Based on Breach of Contract

Filing # E-Filed 09/22/ :42:05 PM

In the District Court of Appeal Fifth District of Florida

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT July Term 2011

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED OF FLORIDA

SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.: SCU- H0) On Discretionary Review From. The Fourth District Court of Appeal (4D10-674) JACQUELINE HARVEY,

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

STATE OF RHODE ISLAND AND PROVIDENCE PLANTATIONS. (Filed: May 17, 2012)

Case 1:17-cv DPG Document 48 Entered on FLSD Docket 03/30/2018 Page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P

Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida

ST.A T:: o r:- MArN. Cumber, 6 -~.., E: -, " ~"' C'erk's Office. JUL 1,.a RE Cc. /VEO

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT CASE NO: 2D L.T. CASE NO: 2011-CA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA JACKSONVILLE DIVISION. Case No. 3:16-cv-178-J-MCR ORDER

Case 3:12-cv RCJ-WGC Document 49 Filed 03/25/13 Page 1 of 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA

Case 1:11-cv LG -RHW Document 32 Filed 12/08/11 Page 1 of 11

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

FIFTH DISTRICT. PRESIDING JUSTICE STEWART delivered the opinion of the court:

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Case 0:18-cv BB Document 31 Entered on FLSD Docket 10/19/2018 Page 1 of 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

THIRD REVISED POLICIES and PROCEDURES. Residential Mortgage Foreclosures Homestead and Non-Homestead

Defendant answers as follows:

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF MARYLAND. This Court s Standing Committee on Rules of Practice and

IN THE FOURTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE XXXXXXXXXX JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR XXXXXXXXX COUNTY, FLORIDA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) /

In the District Court of Appeal Fourth District of Florida

U.S. National Association, as Trustee for CSMC Mortgage- Backed Pass-Through Certificates Series (CSMC )., Plaintiff, against

CAN BRING THE ACTION BECAUSE THAT IS WHAT THE CONTRACT SAYS, BUT THEY CAN'T DEFEND THE AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES AND COUNTERCLAIMS

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE SEVENTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR BROWARD COUNTY, FLORIDA

In the District Court of Appeal Fourth District of Florida

CASE NO. 1D Daniel W. Hartman of Hartman Law Firm, P.A.; Eric S. Haug of Eric S. Haug Law & Consulting, P.A., Tallahassee, for Appellants.

110 High St. LLC v 110 High St NY Slip Op 33076(U) December 27, 2012 Supreme Court, Wayne County Docket Number: 74322/2012 Judge: Dennis M.

Defendants Black Bear Industrial Inc., Jeffrey P. Richard, and Northern Mountain I. BACKGROUND

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE EIGHTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR BREVARD COUNTY, FLORIDA

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT JANUARY TERM v. Case No. 5D CORRECTED TONY LIPPI,

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE ELEVENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR MIAMI DADE COUNTY, FLORIDA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA * * * ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Where Do We Stand on Standing: Standing to Sue in Foreclosure Actions and Plaintiff s Prima Facie Case And Other Defenses and Issues

FILED: KINGS COUNTY CLERK 02/04/2014 INDEX NO /2013 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 15 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 02/04/2014

NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P : : : Appellants : No: 1437 EDA 2016

Argued September 26, 2017 Decided. Before Judges Hoffman and Mayer.

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT

Case 2:12-cv MJP Document 35 Filed 02/14/13 Page 1 of 7

Case 0:14-cv WPD Document 28 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/05/2014 Page 1 of 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA


(Effective August 31, 2018) Cure of obvious description errors in recorded instruments.

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS ELEVENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT LAKE COUNTY, OHIO

MOTION TO VACATE FINAL JUDGMENT OF FORECLOSURE AND INCORPORATED MEMORANDUM OF LAW

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT

~/

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF COUNTY, ARKANSAS DIVISION PLAINTIFF DEFENDANT S RESPONSES TO PLAINTIFF S REQUEST FOR ADMISSION OF FACTS

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE T\VENTIETH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, CIVIL DIVISION

NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION ONE

Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED OF FLORIDA

Illinois Official Reports

BRANCH BANKING AND TRUST COMPANY, Plaintiff, v. S & S DEVELOPMENT, INC., Brian K. Swain and Donald K. Stephens, Defendants.

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT JULY TERM v. Case No. 5D

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL SECOND DISTRICT OF FLORIDA. Appellants/Defendants, Case No. 2D

(Reprinted with amendments adopted on May 17, 2017) SECOND REPRINT S.B. 33. Referred to Committee on Judiciary

In the District Court of Appeal Fourth District of Florida

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT

In the District Court of Appeal Fourth District of Florida

Case 9:16-cv KAM Document 23 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/24/2017 Page 1 of 13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

This brochure may be helpful if: Your house is in foreclosure, AND You have been served with a Complaint for Foreclosure

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT

Submitted December 6, 2017 Decided. Before Judges Koblitz and Manahan.

Chapter 355. (House Bill 728) Residential Property Foreclosure Required Documents Timing of Mediation

Proposed Rules for First Reading page 2. Rule 4.3 Withdrawal page 2. Rule 5.1 Prompt Completion page 5

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED OF FLORIDA

STATE OF FLORIDA, OFFICE OF THB ATTORNEY GENERAL DEPAR'l'MENT OF LEGAL AFFAIRS ASSURANCE OF VOLUNTARY COMPLIANCE

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT S MOTION FOR ATTORNEY S FEES AND COSTS. THIS MATTER came before the Court upon Defendant s Motion for Attorney s Fees

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA CHARLOTTE DIVISION CIVIL ACTION NO: 3:13-CV-678-MOC-DSC

mg Doc 7112 Filed 06/16/14 Entered 06/16/14 11:44:45 Main Document Pg 1 of 9

Title: Bail Bond Mortgages STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE. Jul 24, 1991

Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida

Definitions of Terms Used in Small Claims Court

Bank of N.Y. Mellon v Arthur 2013 NY Slip Op 32625(U) October 23, 2013 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: /2010 Judge: Cynthia S.


2:12-cv DPH-MKM Doc # 10 Filed 04/30/13 Pg 1 of 7 Pg ID 99 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

LaSalle Bank N.A. v Browd 2015 NY Slip Op 30833(U) May 8, 2015 Supreme Court, Queens County Docket Number: 18563/08 Judge: Howard G.

CASE NO. and. Appellants,

Plaintiff ORDER ON MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT. The plaintiff moves for summary judgment in an action for foreclosure

RULES GOVERNING THE COURTS OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY RULE 5:5. PRETRIAL PROCEDURES AND PROCEDURES RELATING TO CERTAIN JUDGMENTS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ) NO. ED CV JLQ

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT JANUARY TERM v. Case No. 5D

Declaration of Trust Establishing, Nominee Trust

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF ST. LOUIS COUNTY, MISSOURI ASSOCIATE DIVISION ORDER

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT. v. Case No. 5D

In the District Court of Appeal Third District of Florida

COMMONWEALTH OF KENTUCKY FAYETTE CIRCUIT COURT DIVISION 8 CASE NO. 09-CI-6405

Transcription:

Standing requires that the party prosecuting the action have a sufficient stake in the outcome and that the party bringing the claim be recognized in the law as being a real party in interest entitled to bring the claim. This entitlement to prosecute a claim in Florida courts rests exclusively in those persons granted by substantive law, the power to enforce the claim. Kumar Corp. v Nopal Lines, Ltd, et al, 462 So. 2d 1178, (Fla. 3d DCA1985). A plaintiff s lack of standing at the commencement of a case is a fault that cannot be cured by gaining standing after the case has been filed. Progressive Express Ins. Co. v. McGrath Community Chiropractic, 913 So. 2d 1281, 1285 (Fla. 2d DCA 2005). If the party was without standing when the suit was filed then a new lawsuit must be filed. Progressive, 913 So. 2d at 1285 (citing Jeff_Ray Corp. v. Jacobson, 566 So. 2d 885, 886 (Fla. 4th DCA 1990) (finding that "the assignee of a mortgage could not maintain the mortgage foreclosure action because the assignment was dated four months after the action was filed, if the plaintiff wished to proceed on the assignment, it must file a new complaint.") See also, Rule 1.140(h)(2), Fla.R.Civ.P. provides that the defense of lack of jurisdiction of the subject matter may be raised at any time. Maynard v. The Florida Board of Education, 998 So. 2 nd 1201 (Fla. 2nd DCA 2009) (Standing may be raised even after a verdict is entered as long as it is preserved at the trial court). Fla.R.Civ.P Rule1.130(a) mandates that: (a) Instruments Attached. All bonds, notes, bills of exchange, contracts, accounts, or documents upon which action may be brought or defense made, or a copy thereof or a copy of the portions thereof material to the pleadings, shall be incorporated in or attached to the pleading. No papers shall be unnecessarily annexed as exhibits. The pleadings shall contain no unnecessary recitals of deeds, documents, contracts, or other instruments. Failure to attach at least a copy of the note is a huge red flag! Mortgage who is the mortgagee? Is the mortgagee the Plaintiff? Is the mortgagee a corporation or a trust? MERS Note who is the note payable to? Not MERS Negotiated/Endorsed/Allonge? Negotiable Instrument? Assignments do not need to be attached, just alleged Also need all of the closing documents from your client and/or the closing agent

Closely examine the chain of assignments Make sure they go from A to B to C to D and not A to D Do the assignments match the endorsements? Was in notarized where the assignor is located? Is it back dated? Effective date? Dated before or after the complaint was filed? Is the person signing on behalf of the assignor an employee of the assignor with authority to convey ownership? i.e. is the person a robo-signer? Does the lender listed on the mortgage match the Plaintiff? Assignment Is a note attached, who is the lender? Endorsed? Exhibits attached to a pleading become a part of the pleading for all purposes. If an exhibit facially negates the cause of action asserted, the document attached as an exhibit controls and must be considered in determining a motion to dismiss. Fladell v. Palm Beach County Canvassing Board, 772 So.2d 1240 (Fla. 2000) Failure to do required loss mitigation VA, FHA, Fannie/Freddie, HAMP Lack of standing Failure to give notice of assignment Unclean hands Breach of good faith and fair dealing Any affirmative claims you may have

Truth in Lending Act (TILA) Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act (RESPA) Limited private rights of action Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (FDCPA) Only if it got the debt in default Florida Consumer Collection Practices Act (FCCPA) Florida Deceptive and Unfair Trade Practices Act (FDUTPA) Banks are exempt Any deceptive or unfair practice Be prepared for a long process Tailor it to your case Judges do not like the boilerplate discovery; much more likely to get what you are asking for if you can show why it is an issue in your case Do interrogatories and requests for production first Confirm with admissions and depositions Expect to do a motion to compel Follow up on discovery in a timely manner; much more likely that judge will give you what you are asking for Start with the corporate rep This person has to come to you Fact witnesses Must travel to these people usually a good investment Signators of the assignments Verifier of the complaint Person who signed the affidavit of indebtedness

The Supreme Court required early mediation (RMFM) has proved to be largely ineffective Everyone going through the motions No incentive to settle FHA or VA loans Regular mediation Schedule for a full day Hope that someone with full authority shows up