RPC Rule 3.7. Purpose. The Lawyer as Witness: RPC Rule 3.7. County Attorneys Summer Conference. UNC School of Government

Similar documents
DISQUALIFICATION OF THE ADVOCATE/WITNESS Adopted June 18, 1988 Revised June 18, 1994, May 10, 1997 and October 20, 2012

Louisiana State Bar Association Rules of Professional Conduct Committee

Cite as 2018 Ark. 16 SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS

ETHICS OPINION

ADVOCATE MODEL RULE 3.1

Ethics for Organizational Attorneys

RULE 1.7 CONFLICT OF INTEREST: GENERAL RULE

Questions: 1. May Lawyer file an affidavit for change of judge against Judge X in Defendant s case?

Rule 605. Competency of judge as witness. NC General Statutes - Chapter 8C Article 6 1

ETHICS IN DEPENDENCY PRACTICE FOR GUARDIAN AD LITEM ATTORNEYS AND ATTORNEYS AD LITEM. Striving for Excellence

Defense Counsel's Duties When Client Insists On Testifying Falsely

Ethical Obligations and Responsibilities of Trial and Appellate Attorneys Lyana Hunter UNC Chapel Hill School of Government (August 2015)

STATE OF OHIO ) IN THE COURT OF APPEALS NINTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COUNTY OF SUMMIT ) DECISION AND JOURNAL ENTRY

Part 3 Rules for Providing Legal Representation in Non- Capital Criminal Appeals and Non-Criminal Appeals

THE NEW YORK CITY BAR ASSOCIATION COMMITTEE ON PROFESSIONAL ETHICS. FORMAL OPINION : Issuing a subpoena to a current client

Filing an Answer to the Complaint or Moving to Dismiss under Rule 12

Working With The Difficult Lawyer

KENTUCKY BAR ASSOCIATION RULES OF THE SUPREME COURT OF KENTUCKY PRACTICE OF LAW

John P. O Donnell, J.:

ETHICAL ISSUES IN JUVENILE COURT JUNE 3, 2005 LAWRENCE J. FINE, DISTRICT COURT JUDGE

Administrative Rules for the Office of Professional Regulation Effective date: February 1, Table of Contents

NC Local Health Directors Legal Conference April 2008 Norma Houston UNC-CH School of Government

Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida, January Term, A.D. 2013

RESOLUTION OF THE MARYS LAKE LODGE COMBINED CONDOMINIUM OWNERS ASSN., INC. REGARDING POLICIES AND PROCEDURES FOR COVENANT AND RULE ENFORCEMENT

STATE OF MICHIGAN BEFORE THE JUDICIAL TENURE COMMISSION RESPONDENT S MOTION TO DISQUALIFY EXAMINER AND JTC STAFF

THE RESPONSIBILITIES OF THE ATTORNEY GUARDIAN AD LITEM By Natalie J. Miller, Esq.

ETHICAL CONSIDERATIONS FOR PRO BONO LAWYERS Prepared by Attorney Patricia Zeeh Risser LEGAL ACTION OF WISCONSIN

CLIENT FEE DISPUTE ARBITRATION DOCUMENTS

Judicial Assistant s > ALWAYS copy opposing counsel(s) on correspondence to the Court

Corporate Depositions: Limiting In-House Counsel Depos and Selecting/Preparing Employees for 30(b)(6) Depos

Judicial Practice Preferences Circuit Civil/Section 11

NAILAH K. BYRD CUYAHOGA COUNTY CLERK OF COURTS 1200 Ontario Street Cleveland, Ohio Court of Common Pleas. BRIEF March 14, :28

[SUBSECTIONS (a) AND (b) ARE UNCHANGED]

LOUISIANA STATE BAR ASSOCIATION LAWYER DISPUTE RESOLUTION PROGRAM RULES (Prev. Rev. 10/06/00) Effective May 1, Preamble

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE

Table of Contents. See also Summary of Contents beginning on page vii.

Honorable Judge Thomas Ramsberger 545 First Avenue North, Room 200 St. Petersburg, FL JURY TRIAL WEEKS * ALL ONE (1) WEEK DOCKETS *

Chapter 205 DECISION-MAKING PROCEDURES

RULES OF THE 42nd ANNUAL NATIONAL TRIAL COMPETITION

Case 5:17-cv EFM-TJJ Document 20 Filed 06/16/17 Page 1 of 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS

BY-LAWS OF THE ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT OF THE BOROUGH OF SOUTH PLAINFIELD. Table of Contents

California Bar Examination

Preparing the Lawyer to Be the Witness

COURT RULES 21st JUDICIAL CIRCUIT

NO. V. AT LAW NO. 1. Defendant(s). ELLIS COUNTY, TEXAS. FINAL PRETRIAL SUBMISSION [Required For Bench Trials over two (2) hours]

Selected Model Rules of Professional Conduct Ellen C. Yaroshefsky

AMERICAN BAR ASSOCIATION MODEL RULES OF PROFESSIONAL CONDUCT

CIVIL TRIAL LAW CERTIFICATION STANDING COMMITTEE POLICIES 100 ADMINISTRATION

RULE 1.16: DECLINING OR TERMINATING REPRESENTATION

Due Process and Legal Ethics in the Practice of Guardianship Law

RULES OF THE 44 th ANNUAL NATIONAL TRIAL COMPETITION

Legal Ethics: Unauthorized Practice of Law. CONTACT US

High Value Trading LLC v Shaoul 2016 NY Slip Op 32411(U) December 8, 2016 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: /11 Judge: Joan A.

Board of Governors. May 17, Agenda Item 97 Special Committee on Collaborative Law

RULES GOVERNING THE COURTS OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY RULE 2:9. MISCELLANEOUS PROCEEDINGS PENDING APPEAL

TITLE 23: EDUCATION AND CULTURAL RESOURCES SUBTITLE A: EDUCATION CHAPTER I: STATE BOARD OF EDUCATION SUBCHAPTER n: DISPUTE RESOLUTION

STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS

LOCAL COURT RULES. 39th Judicial Circuit

Association of Women Attorneys of Lake County

NOVA SCOTIA PROVINCIAL COURT RULES

9. COMPETENCY AND PERSONAL KNOWLEDGE A. INTRODUCTION

Local Government Employee Lobbyists 2010 Legislative Update

West's F.S.A. Bar Rule Rule Conflict ofinterest;

(1) a budget for the public defender's office, including salaries;

Today s Topics 8/22/2012. Records Involving Attorney Client Communications and Work Product Public Records Law Webinar Series

ADR CODE OF PROCEDURE

July 5, Conflicts for the Lawyer

Part 1 Rules for the Continued Delivery of Services in Non- Capital Criminal and Non-Criminal Cases at the Trial Level

Oregon RPC 1.16 provides, in part:

These rules shall be known as the Local Rules for Columbia and Montour Counties, the 26 th Judicial District, and shall be cited as L.R. No.

Ethics/Professional Responsibility-Guardian Ad Litem

Rules of Procedure TABLE OF CONTENTS

ABOTA MOTIONS IN LIMINE SEMINAR

North Carolina Indigent Defense Manual Series John Rubin, Editor

JUDICIAL PRACTICE PREFERENCES FOR CIRCUIT FAMILY

STATE GOVERNMENT ETHICS ACT (G.S. Chapter 138A)

CALIFORNIA YACHT BROKERS ASSOCIATION

Streamlined Arbitration Rules and Procedures

Petitioner,, In Pro Per, and Respondent,, has been retained by Petitioner to advise and counsel Petitioner during the course of the

RULES OF TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT OF LABOR AND WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT DIVISION OF WORKERS COMPENSATION

LOCAL OPERATING PROCEDURES IMMIGRATION COURT SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA

COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS MEMORANDUM OPINION

PLANNING BOARD PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE LIVINGSTON PLANNING BOARD

Supreme Court of Florida

January 13, VIA Board of Governors Washington State Bar Association. Dear Governors:

CLIENT-LAWYER RELATIONSHIP MODEL RULE 1.2

Chapter II BAY MILLS COURT OF APPEALS

Index of Subjects. Created by: Neil Savage, JD Legal Publications Editor/Indexer th Ave NE Seattle, WA

National Patent Board Non-Binding Arbitration Rules TABLE OF CONTENTS

The Rule 30(b)(6) Witness Pitfalls and Concerns in Properly Preparing Your Corporate Representative. Michael Amon Christopher Marchese

ENTRY ORDER SUPREME COURT DOCKET NO JULY TERM, 2014

GUILTY PLEA and PLEA AGREEMENT8Y:

COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS CRIMINAL ACTION NO ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ADDENDUM. 211 Congress Street Boston, MA Tel:

Academy of Court- Appointed Masters. Section 2. Appointment Orders

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR CLARK COUNTY, OHIO. HENNIS, : (Criminal Appeal from Common Pleas Court) Appellant. :

To adopt a uniform procedure to be followed when enforcing covenants and rules to facilitate the efficient operation of the Association.

UNIFIED FAMILY COURT POLICIES & PROCEDURES HONORABLE SCOTT CUPP ( 5, 2018 NOTICE OF RELATED CASES IN UNIFIED FAMILY COURT

CONTENTS. vii. Acknowledgments

Minnesota No-Fault, Comprehensive or Collisions Damage Automobile Insurance Arbitration RULES

NAPD Formal Ethics Opinion 16-1

Transcription:

The Lawyer as Witness: RPC Rule 3.7 County Attorneys Summer Conference Frayda Bluestein & Norma Houston July 14, 2017 RPC Rule 3.7 (a) A lawyer shall not act as advocate at a trial in which the lawyer is likely to be a necessary witness unless: (1) the testimony relates to an uncontested issue; (2) the testimony relates to the nature and value of legal services rendered in the case; or (3) disqualification of the lawyer would work substantial hardship on the client. (b) A lawyer may act as advocate in a trial in which another lawyer in the lawyer's firm is likely to be called as a witness unless precluded from doing so by Rule 1.7 or Rule 1.9. Purpose Avoid confusion for trier of fact UNC School of Government www.sog.unc.edu Page 1

Purpose Witness Offers proof based on personal knowledge Lawyer Offers analysis of witness proof Three Dimensions of the Rule Ethical Procedural Evidentiary Ethical Ethical rules designed to shape attorney behavior Judge makes ruling but rule requires attorneys to flag situations and withdraw from participation when appropriate Note overlap with conflict of interest rules (1.7 and 1.9) UNC School of Government www.sog.unc.edu Page 2

Necessity of the Evidence Lawyer must make good faith evaluation of whether testimony will be relevant, material, and unobtainable elsewhere Evaluation must be ongoing N.C. State Bar 2011 FEO 1 Procedural Focus is on trial and effect on trier of facts Judge manages roles of attorneys and witnesses to maintain integrity of process Must balance rights of parties and of attorney to represent her client Evidentiary Focus is on nature of evidence and whether evidence is necessary Recognizes attorney testimony may be impeachable due to client relationship Exception recognizes uncontested facts and testimony about legal services rendered not a problem Recognizes client s interests under substantial hardship standard UNC School of Government www.sog.unc.edu Page 3

Substantial Hardship Balancing interests of client and those of tribunal and opposing party Factors include Complexity of case Familiarity with client and case Available of substitute counsel Cost and time Possibility of mitigating by granting continuation Tactical Use of the Rule Attorney may be named by opposing counsel Must do more than just assert necessity Judges must balance interests to prevent tactical disqualification to detriment of represented party Scope of Disqualification Does not disqualify firm Does not prevent work outside of the trial Could apply to pretrial attorney testimony in affidavits or depositions if introduced at trial UNC School of Government www.sog.unc.edu Page 4

Procedural Considerations Rule applies whether attorney is called by opposing counsel or on behalf of own client Motion to disqualify can be made pre-trial; judge may delay ruling to better determine necessity of evidence Appeal can be interlocutory (affects substantial right of party and attorney) Ethical and Practical Considerations Lawyer witness more easily impeachable for interest may be less effective witness Advocate who is also witness is ineffective in arguing his own credibility Raises questions of impairment of obligation of competence that lawyer owes client Ethical and Practical Considerations Firm not automatically disqualified - consider conflicts and potential for waiver of attorney-client privilege Include a third party when interviewing or meeting with people to avoid being only person with knowledge of the evidence UNC School of Government www.sog.unc.edu Page 5

Considerations for County Attorneys In-house counsel may be more likely to have relevant evidence Availability of insurance counsel may mitigate Frequency of insurance counsel may favor disqualification less likely to be seen as detriment to client Consider application of rule in quasi-judicial proceedings where attorneys may present mixture of arguments on law and evidence What s Your Experience?? Have you ever testified as a witness?? How was it different from serving as a lawyer?? Any advice on prepping to be a witness? GOOD LUCK! UNC School of Government www.sog.unc.edu Page 6