EYEWITNESS IDENTIFICATION MODEL POLICY

Similar documents
DELMAR POLICE DEPARTMENT

LAW ENFORCEMENT AND EYEWITNESS IDENTIFICATIONS:

Virginia Beach Police Department General Order Chapter 8 - Criminal Investigations

SECTION: OPERATIONS OPR-229A EYEWITNESS IDENTIFICATIONS

Contemporary Issues in Criminal Investigation and Prosecution Working Group EYEWITNESS IDENTIFICATION Model Policy February 2016

R.C Page 1. (1) Administrator means the person conducting a photo lineup or live lineup.

EYEWITNESS IDENTIFICATION PROCEDURES

LAST UPDATE: POLICY SOURCE: Chief of Police TOTAL PAGES: 7

Rhode Island Police Chiefs Association LINE-UP AND SHOW-UP PROCEDURES (Eyewitness Identification) MODEL POLICY GENERAL ORDER

THURMONT POLICE DEPARTMENT

The first of these contains the FAQs concerning the main document.

ATTORNEY GENERAL DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Identification Procedures

TYPE OF ORDER NUMBER/SERIES ISSUE DATE EFFECTIVE DATE General Order /3/2013 5/5/2013

East Haven Police Department

EYEWITNESS IDENTIFICATION

COVINGTON POLICE DEPARTMENT STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE

REPORT OF THE CHIEF LEGISLATIVE ANALYST

BILL AS INTRODUCED AND PASSED BY SENATE AND HOUSE S Page 1 of 11. Subject: Crimes; innocence protection; eyewitness identification

EYEWITNESS IDENTIFICATION REFORM ACT

Eyewitness identification is evidence received from a witness who has actually seen an event and can so testify in court.

COURT OF COMMON PLEAS CLERMONT COUNTY, OHIO. Plaintiff : CASE NO CR 00706

JAN shown that eyewitness identification procedures currently used. by law enforcement officials may lead to faulty eyewitness

New York State Photo Identification Guidelines

Eyewitness refers to an individual who personally witnessed the crime under investigation or observed the suspect in the area of the crime scene.

NORTH CAROLINA SUPERIOR COURT JUDGES BENCHBOOK VOIR DIRE ON PRETRIAL AND IN-COURT IDENTIFICATION

Eyewitness Identification. Leader Guide

SUSPECT IDENTIFICATION

THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF PENNSYLVANIA SENATE BILL INTRODUCED BY FERLO, STOUT, GREENLEAF, COSTA, KITCHEN, STACK AND FONTANA, APRIL 9, 2007 AN ACT

SAN DIEGO POLICE DEPARTMENT PROCEDURE

Section: 2.310, Page 1 of 10 Effective: August 5, 2011 Reissued: 08/25/16. Towson University Police Department Manual of General Directives

Detentions And Photographing Detainees

No. 1D On appeal from the Circuit Court for Alachua County. Mark W. Moseley, Judge. April 5, 2018

GENERAL POLICE ORDER CLEVELAND DIVISION OF POLICE

MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY. EFFECTIVE DATE: 1 January 1999 PAGE 1 OF 12

Santa Cruz Police Department Santa Cruz Police Department Policy Manual

Police Detective (2223) Task List. 1. Reviews investigative reports received from supervising detective in order to determine assigned duties.

Supreme Court significantly revised the framework for determining the. 221, 590 P2d 1198 (1979), in light of current scientific research and adopt[ed]

COURT OF APPEALS EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS EL PASO, TEXAS O P I N I O N. In accordance with the parties plea-bargain agreement, the trial court

2005 WISCONSIN ACT 60

The People of the State of New York. against. Ismael Nazario, Defendant.

I Saw You but Did I Really?:

AN ACT BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF TEXAS: SECTIONA1.AAChapter 2, Code of Criminal Procedure, is

PHILADELPHIA POLICE DEPARTMENT DIRECTIVE 5.17

GUIDELINES FOR COMPLETING QUESTIONNAIRE

STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS

Case 3:16-cr BR Document 976 Filed 08/02/16 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON PORTLAND DIVISION

A NEW STRATEGY FOR PREVENTING WRONGFUL CONVICTIONS

Jeffrey I. Dellheim, for appellant. Patrick J. Hynes, for respondent. In this case, turning on the accuracy of eyewitnesses'

BAKERSFIELD POLICE MEMORANDUM

Policy 5.11 ARREST PROCEDURES

SUBJECT: Sample Interview & Interrogation Policy

Virginia Commonwealth University Police Department

RENO POLICE DEPARTMENT GENERAL ORDER

LPG Models, Methods and Processes

Marquette University Police Department

A REPORT BY THE NEW YORK STATE OFFICE OF THE STATE COMPTROLLER

Bowie State University Police Department General Order

NH DIVISION OF LIQUOR ENFORCEMENT AND LICENSING ADMINISTRATION & OPERATIONS MANUAL

Jan Hoth, for appellant. Meredith Boylan, for respondent. Innocence Project, Inc.; Legal Aid Society et al., amici curiae.

Psychology and Law. I. How are jurors influenced by witnesses, the defendant, and the judge? A. How are jurors influenced by eyewitness testimony?

APPEAL from a judgment and an order of the circuit court for Milwaukee County: TIMOTHY G. DUGAN, Judge. Affirmed.

Policy Tualatin Police Department. Policy Manual

Evidence is any substance or material found or recovered in connection with a criminal investigation.

Constitution; Article I, Sections 19, 21, 23, 27, and 36, and Article XI, Section 2 of the. of and. A Rule 24 hearing was held on December 8,

USE OF FORCE / USE OF FORCE IN RESPONSE TO THREAT/NON-COMPLIANCE

Innocence Protections Proposal

MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY

COMMONWEALTH vs. SCOTT E. FIELDING. No. 18-P-342. Dukes. November 13, January 29, Present: Milkey, Henry, & Englander, JJ.

From: Associate Attorney General Anne Edwards and Assistant Attorney General Brian Buonamano

TOPEKA POLICE DEPARTMENT POLICY AND PROCEDURE MANUAL 4.1 INVESTIGATIVE PROCEDURE: CONSTITUTIONAL LAW

TEXARKANA, TEXAS POLICE DEPARTMENT GENERAL ORDERS MANUAL. Amended Date June 1, 2017

ELECTRONIC RECORDING OF CUSTODIAL INTERROGATION PROCEDURES

CHAPTER 3 Section VIII 10/1/2016 Polygraph Policy

Virginia Commonwealth University Police Department

Marissa Boyers Bluestine, Legal Director. A Day in the Life of a PD Lightstream Communications CLE

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE

Lexipol Illinois Policy Manual

TOPEKA POLICE DEPARTMENT POLICY AND PROCEDURE MANUAL 4.7 DOMESTIC MATTERS

NASCIO Nomination eomis/justicexchange Digital Government: Government to Government

STATE OF OHIO KIRKLAND FARMER

Signature: Signed by GNT Date Signed: 12/10/13

Chief of Police: Review Date: July 1

Utah County Law Enforcement Officer Involved Incident Protocol

BALTIMORE CITY SCHOOLS Baltimore School Police Force STOP AND FRISK

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO. v. NO. 27,763. APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF DOÑA ANA COUNTY Douglas Driggers, District Judge

4600 FIELD INVESTIGATIONS - CRIMINAL. B. Procedure

Scottsdale, Arizona Telephone Appearing Pro Per IN THE SUPERIOR COURT FOR THE STATE OF ARIZONA IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF MARICOPA

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE APRIL SESSION, October 23, 1995 STATE OF TENNESSEE ) )

Maricopa County Attorney Officer Involved Shooting Response Protocol

Expert Eyewitness Testimony. By: Janine M. Kovacs

CHAPTER THREE LAW ENFORCEMENT IDENTIFICATIONS AND INTERROGATIONS

DELMAR POLICE DEPARTMENT

STATE BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION PROCEDURE 12 POLICY AND PROCEDURE MANUAL JULY 1, 2002 ARREST PROCEDURES

Police Ride Alongs. In This Issue: Photograph Lineup. Pedestrian Infraction. Marijuana Odor on a Person

MARICOPA COUNTY SHERIFF S OFFICE POLICY AND PROCEDURES

Election Inspector Training Points Booklet

2019COA32. A division of the court of appeals considers whether two guilty. pleas entered at the same hearing to two charges brought in

DONALOL.~ARaAECHT. LAWlIiRARY. Before the court is defendant's motion to suppress both the out of court

HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES STAFF ANALYSIS REFERENCE ACTION ANALYST STAFF DIRECTOR

Transcription:

EYEWITNESS IDENTIFICATION MODEL POLICY I. PURPOSE The purpose of this policy is to establish guidelines for eyewitness identification procedures using photographic lineups, live lineups and showups. II. POLICY It is the policy of this agency that eyewitness identifications be conducted in a manner most likely to assess witnesses true and reliable recollections in compliance with state and federal constitutional requirements. Agency members shall afford witnesses, suspects, and defendants all legal rights that are afforded any citizen. The core objectives of this policy are to ensure constitutional rights by improving the ability of law enforcement officials to act appropriately during eyewitness identifications. Further, this policy is intended to reduce misidentifications, improve the reliability of identifications, and establish evidence that conforms to legal precedent. The double-blind procedure, in which neither the officer conducting the lineup nor the witness is aware of the suspect s identity, is the preferred method. If this method is not practicable, an alternative technique of blinded administration may be used, in which the officer may know the suspect s identity but cannot see which photograph is being viewed by the witness at a given time (e.g. the folder shuffle method, in which photographs are placed in folders and shuffled and then handed over to the eyewitness). III. DEFINITIONS Double-blind presentation or lineup means the law enforcement official (and witness) do not know which photograph or person is the suspect. Double-blind is the proper term to use, but is often used interchangeably with the term "blind" and means the same thing. Blinded administration is when the officer knows the suspect's identity but cannot tell which suspect is being viewed at a given time, such as through use of the folder shuffle method. Sequential presentation is a display of photographs or persons one at a time, where the law enforcement official retrieves one before presenting another. Simultaneous presentation is a display of photographs or persons presented at the same time, either manually constructed or computer generated. Showup is the presentation of a live person in the field who is close in time and proximity to the incident under investigation. Confidence statement is a witness s statement about his or her selection and the confidence with which it is made. It is taken immediately after the selection has been made. IV. PROCEDURES 1

Instructions to witnesses shall be read from the Eyewitness Identification form, which shall also include a witness s affirmation of his or her confidence statements. A video record with audio is the preferred method of documenting the presentations. Presentations, forms, and video records shall be treated as evidence, with documentation included in the investigative file, whether or not the witnesses made identifications. If a photo lineup is developed electronically, the lineup shall be printed for documentation. Law enforcement officials shall provide a written justification for using a live or photographic presentation other than a double blind or blinded presentation. 1. Obtaining a Description of the Perpetrator. Prior to any lineup, law enforcement shall record a thorough description of the perpetrator from each eyewitness, taken separately for each eyewitness, in her or her own words. 2. Witness Instructions Prior to the start of the identification procedure, the officer shall read the witness instructions. Specific instructions for photographic lineups, live lineups, and showups are included on the forms in Section V. The witness shall sign the form to indicate that he or she understands the instructions. 3. Photographic Lineup Organizing a Photographic Lineup Include only one suspect in each identification procedure, with a minimum of five fillers. Fillers shall match the witness s description of the perpetrator in significant features, including any unique or unusual features. All photographs shall be contemporary and similar in size. There should be consistency in personal features across all pictures. The photographs shall be numbered. When conducting a single lineup for multiple witnesses, renumber photographs for each witness. If the witness has previously viewed a photo lineup in connection with the offense, use different fillers. Conducting a Photographic Lineup Whenever possible, a blind administrator, e.g. an officer who does not know the suspect s identity, should conduct the procedure. If that is not practicable, a blinded administration technique such as the folder shuffle may be used (see below for details). Prior to the presentation, read instructions to the witness on the form in Section V, ensuring and documenting that they understand the instructions. If conducting a simultaneous presentation, photographs are presented at the same time. If using sequential presentation: a. The law enforcement official shall display the photographs to the witness by replacing one photograph with another so that no two are presented at the same time. b. The law enforcement official shall present each photograph to the witness, even if the witness identifies a previous photograph as the suspect. c. At the request of the witness, the law enforcement official may present the photographs again; each photograph must be presented and presented sequentially. c. After each photograph is presented, ask if the witness recognizes the person. Even if the witness identifies a previous photograph as the suspect, present each photograph in the series. d. At the request of the witness, the law enforcement official may present the photographs one more time. 2

If an identification is made, record a statement of confidence on the form in Section V, which shall be signed by the witness. Blinded Administration (The Folder Shuffle Method): The Folder Shuffle Method was devised to address concerns surrounding limited resources while removing any possibility of suggestiveness in the procedure. Should the investigating officer of a particular case be the only law enforcement personnel available to conduct a photo lineup, the following instructions are recommended: Use one suspect photograph that resembles the description of the perpetrator provided by the witness, five filler photographs that match the description, and ten folders (four of the folders will not contain any photos and will serve as dummy folders ). Affix one filler photo to Folder #1 and number the folder. The individual administering the lineup shall place the suspect photograph and the other four filler photographs into Folders #2-6 and shuffle the photographs so that he is unaware of which folder the suspect is in, and then number the remaining folders, including Folders #7-10, which will remain empty (this is done so that the witness does not know when he has seen the last photo). Prior to the presentation, read instructions to the witness from the form in Section V, ensuring and documenting that they understand the instructions. Without looking at the photo in the folder, the administrator is to hand each folder to the witness individually. Each time the witness has viewed a folder, the witness should indicate whether or not this is the person the witness saw and the degree of confidence in this identification, and return the photo to the administrator. The order of the photos should be preserved, in a facedown position, in order to document. The administrator should then document and record the results of the procedure, including the order of the folders used. If an identification is made, record a statement of confidence on the form in Section V, which shall be signed by the witness. 4. Live Lineups Organizing a Live Lineup Determine when a live lineup is appropriate by considering the availability of witnesses and lookalikes. Include only one suspect in each identification procedure, with a minimum of four fillers. Select fillers who generally fit the witness s description of the suspect. No participant should stand out in the lineup. When conducting more than one lineup due to multiple witnesses, consider placing the suspect in different display positions. When showing a new suspect, avoid reusing fillers in lineups shown to the same witness. Conducting a Live Lineup Live lineups shall be conducted by a blind administrator, who is unaware of the suspect s identity. Prior to a presentation, the law enforcement official shall read the witness instructions from the form in Section V, ensuring and documenting the witness understands the instructions. If conducting a simultaneous lineup, participants are presented at the same time. If conducting a sequential lineup: a. Begin with all lineup participants out of view of the witnesses and present each participant to the witness separately, in a previously determined order, removing those previously shown. b. The law enforcement official shall present each participant to the witness, even if the witness identifies a previous participant as the suspect. 3

c. After each lineup member is presented, ask if the witness recognizes the person. d. At the request of the witness, the law enforcement official may present the participants again each participant must be presented and presented sequentially. If an identification is made, record a statement of confidence on the form in Section V, which shall be signed by the witness. 5. Showups Consider if a photo lineup can be conducted instead of a showup for: increased control, minimizing observable nervousness, and improved logistics. However, when circumstances require the prompt display of a suspect to the witness, the following guidelines shall be followed. Showups shall be conducted only when the suspect is detained within a reasonably short timeframe following the offense. The witness shall be transported to the suspect s location, whenever possible. Presentations shall be recorded when possible. Prior to the presentation, read instructions to the witness from the form in Section V, ensuring and documenting that they understand the instructions. Officers shall avoid suggestive words or conduct, such as presenting the suspect in handcuffs, from the backseat of a patrol car, or being physically restrained by police. Separate witnesses to avoid communication among them, and obtain a thorough description of the suspect from each witness separately prior to the showup. A suspect shall only be viewed by one witness at time, out of the presence and earshot of other witnesses. If an identification is made, record a statement of confidence on the form in Section V, which shall be signed by the witness. 6. Witness Confidence Statement Regardless of the type of identification procedure employed, if an identification is made, the officer shall ask the witness immediately for a statement of confidence in his or her selection in his or her own words. The statement shall be documented by the officer and signed by the eyewitness. 7. Documenting the Identification Procedure. The identification procedure shall be carefully documented. The preferred method of documenting the identification procedure is a video record with audio. Documentation, which shall be treated as evidence, shall include the following: Name of the administrator and eyewitness. Date and time of the identification procedure. Names and sources of fillers used in photo and live lineups. In a photo or live lineup, any eyewitness identification of a filler. All identification and non-identification results obtained during the procedure, including witness confidence statements, signed by the witness. If a photo lineup is developed electronically, the lineup shall be printed for documentation. 4

5

V. FORMS Eyewitness Identification Form: Photo Lineup INSTRUCTIONS (Read by law enforcement official to witness) Case Number: Law Enforcement Official Name: Date and Time of Presentation: Witness Name: Attorney Name & P-Number, if present: In a moment I m going to show you some photographs. A photograph of the person who is involved in the crime may or may not be among them. You will be shown all of the photographs and you may take your time looking at them. You should not feel compelled to make an identification. The police department will continue to investigate the incident whether or not you select someone. If you pick a photograph, I m going to ask you to explain why you picked that photograph and to describe how confident you are in your selection. Please do not ask questions about the person you have selected because we cannot share that information with you at this time. Since this is an ongoing investigation, you should not discuss the identification procedures or the results with other people. Do you understand these instructions? WITNESS SIGNATURES I,, affirm that I read or was read the instructions above, that I understand the instructions, and that the statement written by the law enforcement official accurately reflects what I said. Finally, I understand that I should not talk to other people about the photos or tell them which photo I picked, if any. Signature of Witness (FILLED OUT BY LAW ENFORCEMENT) WITNESS STATEMENT OF CONFIDENCE Witness picked photograph number: Witness confidence statement: 6

Eyewitness Identification Form: Live Lineup INSTRUCTIONS (Read by law enforcement official to witness) Case Number: Law Enforcement Official Name: Date and Time of Presentation: Witness Name: Attorney Name & P-Number: In a moment I m going to show you some individuals. The person who is involved in the crime may or may not be among them. You will be shown all of the individuals and you may take your time looking at them. You should not feel compelled to make an identification. The police department will continue to investigate the incident whether or not you select someone. If you pick an individual, I m going to ask you to explain why you picked that person and to describe how confident you are in your selection. Please do not ask questions about the person you have selected because we cannot share that information with you at this time. Since this is an ongoing investigation, you should not discuss the identification procedures or the results with other people. Do you understand these instructions? WITNESS SIGNATURES I,, affirm that I read or was read the instructions above, that I understand the instructions, and that the statement written by the law enforcement official accurately reflects what I said. Finally, I understand that I should not talk to other people about the lineup or tell them which individual I picked, if any. Signature of Witness (FILLED OUT BY LAW ENFORCEMENT) WITNESS STATEMENT OF CONFIDENCE Witness picked photograph number: Witness confidence statement: 7

Eyewitness Identification Form: Showup INSTRUCTIONS (Read by law enforcement official to witness) Case Number: Law Enforcement Official Name: Date and Time of Presentation: Witness Name: Attorney Name & P-Number: In a moment you re going to view some people. The person who is involved in the crime may or may not be among them. You should not feel compelled to make an identification. The police department will continue to investigate the incident whether or not you select someone. If you identify a person, I m going to ask you to explain why you picked the person and to describe how confident you are in your selection. Please do not ask questions about the person you have selected because we cannot share that information with you at this time. Since this is an ongoing investigation, you should not discuss the identification procedures or the results with other people. Do you understand these instructions? WITNESS SIGNATURES I,, affirm that I read or was read the instructions above, that I understand the instructions, and that the statement written by the law enforcement official accurately reflects what I said. Finally, I understand that I should not talk to other people about the photos or tell them which photo I picked, if any. Signature of Witness (FILLED OUT BY LAW ENFORCEMENT) WITNESS STATEMENT OF CONFIDENCE Witness picked individual: YES/NO Witness confidence statement: 8

Eyewitness Identification Form: Folder Method INSTRUCTIONS (Read by law enforcement official to witness) Case Number: Law Enforcement Official Name: Date and Time of Presentation: Witness Name: Attorney Name & P-Number, if present: In a moment I m going to show you some folders that contain photographs. A photograph of the person who is involved in the crime may or may not be among them. You will be shown all of the photographs and you may take your time looking at them. You should not feel compelled to make an identification. The police department will continue to investigate the incident whether or not you select someone. If you pick a photograph, I m going to ask you to explain why you picked that photograph and to describe how confident you are in your selection. Please do not ask questions about the person you have selected because we cannot share that information with you at this time. Since this is an ongoing investigation, you should not discuss the identification procedures or the results with other people. Do you understand these instructions? WITNESS SIGNATURES I,, affirm that I read or was read the instructions above, that I understand the instructions, and that the statement written by the law enforcement official accurately reflects what I said. Finally, I understand that I should not talk to other people about the photos or tell them which photo I picked, if any. Signature of Witness (FILLED OUT BY LAW ENFORCEMENT) WITNESS STATEMENT OF CONFIDENCE Witness picked folder number: Witness confidence statement: 9

LINEUP IDENTIFICATION CHECKLIST Ensure lineup is conducted with a blind administrator/ blinded administrator using the folder shuffle method. Blind means the administrator does not know the identity of the suspect in the lineup. Blinded means the administrator may know who the suspect is, but by virtue of the use of procedures and/or technology to accomplish this purpose, does not know which lineup member is being viewed by the eyewitness. Provide the following lineup instructions to the witness. The perpetrator may or may not be among the persons in the identification procedure. The administrator does not know who the suspect is. You should not feel compelled to make an identification. The investigation will continue whether or not an identification is made. The procedure requires the administrator to ask you to state, in your own words, how certain you are of any identification. You should not discuss the identification procedure or its results with other eyewitnesses involved in the case and you should not speak with the media. Ensure all fillers/non-suspect photos match the description of the perpetrator provided by the witness. Record the description that the witness gave of the perpetrator. The lineup will be composed of fillers that generally resemble the description of the perpetrator in significant features (i.e., face, weight, build, skin tone, etc.), including any unique or unusual features (i.e., scar, tattoo, etc.). Record the witness confidence statement. If the witness makes an identification, the administrator should document below in the witness own words, how confident he/she is that the individual identified is the perpetrator. BLINDING THE ADMINISTRATOR: The Folder Shuffle Method 10

The Folder Shuffle Method: A Blinded Administration Technique To enhance the accuracy of any eyewitness identification procedure, the officer administering a lineup should not know which lineup member is the police suspect. Eyewitness identification procedures should therefore be conducted by a non-investigating, or blind, administrator. Understandably, small police departments with limited officer manpower or larger departments with officers conducting identifications in the field - may believe that the requirement of blind administration of eyewitness procedures is unfeasible. Yet this need not be the case. Workable solutions have emerged to address this concern. Law enforcement agencies that have implemented this reform report that they are able to blind the administrator without expending additional manpower resources. This is done through the time-tested folder system or by means of emerging laptop technology. THE FOLDER SHUFFLE METHOD The Folder Shuffle Method was devised to address concerns surrounding limited resources while allowing for blind administration. Should the investigating officer of a particular case be the only law enforcement personnel available to conduct a photo lineup, the following instructions are recommended: 1. Use one suspect photograph that resembles the description of the perpetrator provided by the witness, five filler photographs that match the description but do not cause the suspect photograph to unduly stand out, and ten folders [four of the folders will not contain any photos and will serve as dummy folders ]. 2. Affix one filler photo to Folder #1 and number the folder. 3. The individual administering the lineup should place the suspect photograph and the other four filler photographs into Folders #2-6 and shuffle the photographs so that he is unaware of which folder the suspect is in, and then number the remaining folders, including Folders #7-10, which will remain empty. [This is done so that the witness does not know when he has seen the last photo]. 4. The administrator should provide instructions to the witness. The witness should be informed that the perpetrator may or may not be contained in the photos he is about to see and that the administrator does not know which folder contains the suspect. 5. Without looking at the photo in the folder, the administrator is to hand each folder to the witness individually. Each time the witness has viewed a folder, the witness should indicate whether or not this is the person the witness saw and the degree of confidence in this identification, and return the photo to the administrator. The order of the photos should be preserved, in a facedown position, in order to document in Step 6. 6. The administrator should then document and record the results of the procedure. This should include: the date, time and location of the lineup procedure; the name of the administrator; the names of all of the individuals present during the lineup; the number of photos shown; copies of the photographs themselves; the order in which the folders were presented; the sources of all of the photos that were used; a statement of confidence in the witness s own words as to the certainty of his identification, taken immediately upon reaction to viewing; and any additional information the administrator deems pertinent to the procedure. * The information described above was informed by Eyewitness Identification Procedure Recommendations put forth by a Wisconsin Task Force as well as existing research on the folder shuffle. 11

Links to Eyewitness Identification Instructional Videos & Training Materials 1. Police Lineup Instructional Video - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hy8nztct97q 2. Folder Shuffle Instructional Video https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i5a75nshfac 3. Photo Array Instructional Video - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pxq8byqnayg&feature=youtu.be 4. Additional Training Materials- http://norwoodpolice.com/chieftrainingmaterials.html 12