ANDERSON, M. D* "Ecoaoaies of Business Fluctuations in the United States," AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, XVII, June, 1927, pp. 230-260. with appendix, pp. 261-71. "A Criticism" (of the above) by Ralph J. Vatkins, AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, SVIII, September, 1928, pp. 489-97. "A Criticism of 'Economics of Business Fluctuation in the United States, 1919-1925," AER, XVIII, Sept., 1928 pp. 489-97. Digitized for FRASER quantitative approach
ANDERSON, Montgomery D. TOTAL BUSINESS FLUCTUATIONS. Gainesville, Fla.: Kallman Publishing Co., 1949. Pp. xii, 140. Review; by E. C. Bratt, American Economic Review, vol. 40, Dec, 1950, pp. 945-46. Econometric business cycle analysis
ANDERSON, Montgomery D. THEORY OF ECONOMIC AGGREGATES. Gainesville: University of Florida Bookstore, 194-5
A NDERSON, Montgomery D. A FormulE for Total Savings, QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, Vol. 58, November, 1943, pp. 106-19.
ANDERSON., Montgomery D. Investment and the Valuation of Capital, ECONOMETRICA, Vol, 10, July, 1940, pp. 159^-68.
ANDERSON, Montgomery D. CAPITAL AND INTEREST. Chicago: Richard D. Irwin, 1934*
BRATT, E. C. Relations of institutional factors to economic equilibrium and long-time trend, ECONOMETKICA, IV, 1936, pp. 161-83.
CHRIST, Carl A test of an econometric model for the United States, 1921-1847, M in CONFERENCE ON BUSINESS CYCLES. New York: National Bureau of Economic Research, 1951* Comment on above by Milton Friedman, ibid.
CLAEK, Colin Author File A system of equations explaining the United States trade cycle, 1921 to 19415 ECONOMETFICA, Vol. XVII, April 19A9> pp. 93_i24.
CLARK, Colin A system of equations explaining the United St&tes trade cycle, 1921 to 1941. ECONOMETRICA, April, 1949. pp. 93-124.
FISHER, Gene H. A simple econometric model for the United States, 1947-50, REVIEW OF ECONOMIC STATISTICS, February, 195.
FISHER, G. H. A simple econometric model for the United States, 1947-1950 BEVIEW OF ECONOMICS & STATISTICS, February, 1952. 3 pp.
POX, Karl Econometric models of the United States, JOURNAL OP POLITICAL ECONOMT, LXIV, no. 2, April, 1956.
GOODWIN, R. M. The nonlinear accelerator and the persistence of business cycles, ECONQMETRICA, Vol* 19, January, 1951.
HAAVELMO, T. Statistical Testing of Business-Cycle Theories, REVIEW OF ECONOMIC STATISTICS, February, 1943, pp. 13-13.
bt>si^?<-s^ etitles ~fcc R^w^eoJ <** -rco*?^^,, Digitized for FRASER
KALECKI, M. Coomients on the macrodynamic theory of business cycles, ECONOMETEICA, October, 1936. Pp. 5-
KALECKI, M. A macrodynamic theory of cycles, ECONOMETRICA, III, 1935, pp. 327-U. "Comments on the macrodynamic theory of business cycles," ibid., IV, 1936, pp. 356-60.
KEYNES, J. M. Professor Tinbergen 1 s method, ECONOMIC JOURNAL, XLIX, 1939, P?> 558-68.
KLEIN, Lawrence R. ECONOMIC FLUCTUATIONS IN THE UNITED STATES, 1921-1941 c owles Commission for Research in Economics Monograph No. U. New York: Wiley* London: Chapman & Hall, 1950. Pp. xi, 174. Review* by Millard Hastay, AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, vol. 41, June, 1951, pp. 446-49 Econometric treatment dealing with segment of US economic history, 1921-1941.
KLEIN, L. R. ECONOMIC FLUCTUATIONS IN THE UNITED STATES, 1921-41. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 1950. Pp. ix, 174.. Beview: by C. Donald Jackson, JOUENAL OF POLITICAL ECONOMY, LIX, April, 1951, pp. 178-9. The use of econoaetric aodels as a guide to eeonontie pelicy, ECONOMETBICA, April, 1947, pp. 111-151.
KLEIN, L. R. The use of econometric models as a guide to economic policy, ECONOMETRICA, April, 19A7, pp. 111-151.
KOOPMANS, Thalling C. The econometric approach to business fluctuations, AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, SUPPLEMENT, Vol. 39, May, 1949, pp. 64-72. Discussion: by J. V. Angell, A. F. Burns, and G. Haberler, ibid., pp. 73-88.
KOOPMANS, Tjailing C. The econometric approach to business fluctuations, AMERICAS ECONOMIC REVIEW, SUPPLEMENT, vol. 39, May, 1949, pp. 64-72. Discussion* by J. V. Angell, A. F. Sums, ibid., pp. 73-38.
KOOPMANS, T. C Measurement without theory, REVIEW 07 ECONOMICS & STATISTICS, XXIX, Aug. 1947, pp. 161-72.
MABRAMA, V, Short notes on a model of the tirade cycle, THE BEVIEW OF ECONOMIC STUDIES, Vol. XIV(l), IUoJ,if t Mtu/Hl PP» 34-40.
MARSCHAK, Jacob INCOME, EMPLOYMENT, AND THE PRICE LEVEL. New York: Augustus M. Kelley, Inc., 1951.
ROOS, C. F. DYNAMIC ECONOMICS} THEORETICAL AND STATISTICAL STUDIES OF DEMAND, PRODUCTION, AND PRICES. Monograph of Covles Commission for Research In Economics, No. 1. Bloomington: Principia Press, 1934. Pp. xvi, 275.
THEISS, Edward Dynamics of saving and Investment, ECONOMETRICA, III, 1935, pp. 213-224.
THUS, Sfcard A quantitative theory of industrial fluctuations caused by the cspitalistic technique of production, JOURNAL OF POLITICAL ECONOMY, XLI, June, 1933. pp. 334.-49. Pp. 16.
htilxnaert van Digitized for FRASER
TINBERGEN, Jan Reformulation of currency business cycle theories, in CONFERENCE ON BUSINESS CYCLES. New York: National Bureau of Economic Research, 1951.
TINBERGEN, Jan. BUSINESS CYCLES IN THE UNITED KINGDOM, 1879-1914. Amsterdam, North Holland Publishing Co., 1951. 139 pp.
TINBERGEH, Jan Statistical testing of business-cycle theories, REVIEW OF ECONOMIC STATISTICS, Vol. XXV, February, 1943, PP. 13-13.
TINBERGEN, Jan STATISTICAL TESTING OF BUSINES8-CYCLE THEORIES. Vol. II. BUSINESS CYCLES IN THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 1919-1932. Geneva: League of Nations,1939.
TINBERGEN, Jan STATISTICAL TESTING OF BUSINESS CYCLE THEOBIES. Review: by J. M. Keynes, ECONOMIC JOURNAL, September, 1939.
TINBERGEN, Jan. BUSINESS CYCLES IN THE UNITED STATES, 1919-1932. Geneva: League of Nations, 1939
TINTNER, Gerhard The 'simple' theory of business fluctuations: A tentative verification, REVIEW OF ECONOMIC STATIS TICS, Vol. XXVI, No. 3, Aug. 1944, pp. 143-157.
TINTNER, Gerhard The 'simple' theory of business fluctuations: a tentative verification, REVIEW OF ECONOMIC STATISTICS, XXVI, No. 3, Aug. 1944, pp. 148-157.
TINTNER, Gerhard "A 'simple' theory of business fluctuations, ECONOMETRICA, Vol. X, 1942.
VINING, Futledge Methodological issues in quantitative economics. Koopmans on the choice of variables to be studied and of methods of measurement, REVIEW OF ECONOMICS & STATISTICS, XXXI, no. 2, May, 1949, pp. 77-2*. 86 KOOPMANS, T. C: A Reply, ibid., pp. 86-91. A Rejoinder, by R. Vining, ibid., pp. 91-4-
WATKINS, R. J. Criticism of economics of business fluctuations in the United States, 1919-25, AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, XVIII, September, 1928. Paper of M. D. Anderson
C. Theoretical Analysises of Econ, C. Theoretical Analyses of Economic Dynamics and Mathematical Theories of the Cycle