Case 1:10-cv Document 1 Filed 06/22/10 Page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS

Similar documents
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS. Plaintiff, Civil Action No. COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT AND JURY DEMAND

Case 1:15-cv Document 1 Filed 02/27/15 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS. COMPLAINT and Jury Demand

Case 1:16-cv UNA Document 1 Filed 04/19/16 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE COMPLAINT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS. Civil Action No. COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT AND DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS. Plaintiff, Civil Action No.

Plaintiff Privacy Pop, LLC ( Plaintiff ) complains and alleges as follows against Defendant Gimme Gimme, LLC ( Defendant ).

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS VICTORIA DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN. v. Case No. 3:12-cv-686

Case: 1:16-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 11/15/16 Page 1 of 8 PageID #:1

Case 2:15-cv Document 1 Filed 03/11/15 Page 1 of 52

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS LUFKIN DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION. Civil Action No: HON. COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT

Case: 1:16-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 02/12/16 Page 1 of 16 PageID #:1

Case 2:17-cv JLL-JAD Document 1 Filed 05/12/17 Page 1 of 17 PageID: 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS

Case 6:15-cv Document 1 Filed 04/06/15 Page 1 of 5 PageID #: 1

Case: 5:09-cv DDD Doc #: 1 Filed: 06/04/09 1 of 5. PageID #: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION

COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT. 1. This is an action for direct patent infringement of United States Letters Patent Nos.

Case 2:17-cv EJF Document 2 Filed 10/02/17 Page 1 of 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF UTAH CENTRAL DIVISION

Case 2:06-cv SD Document 1-1 Filed 01/10/2006 Page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION

Case 1:08-cv Document 1 Filed 10/13/2008 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION

Case 8:18-cv Document 1 Filed 11/07/18 Page 1 of 5 Page ID #:1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY LOUISVILLE DIVISION

Case 1:07-cv MRB Document 6 Filed 11/06/2007 Page 1 of 9 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI WESTERN DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION INTEX RECREATION CORP.,

Case 2:14-cv JDL Document 1 Filed 08/13/14 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MAINE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION

Case 1:14-cv RWZ Document 1 Filed 05/08/14 Page 1 of 19 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS

Case 1:18-cv YK Document 1 Filed 06/07/18 Page 1 of 5 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN. v. Civil Action No. 2:16-cv-789 COMPLAINT

THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA WESTERN DIVISION Case No: 5:15-cv-590 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION PLAINTIFF S ORIGINAL COMPLAINT

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN MILWAUKEE DIVISION COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF RHODE ISLAND. v. C.A. No. COMPLAINT FOR PATENT AND TRADE DRESS INFRINGEMENT. Nature of the Action

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT

Case 1:13-cv DJC Document 17 Filed 08/14/13 Page 1 of 12 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS

THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA WESTERN DIVISION Case No: 5:11-cv ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. Plaintiff Case No.: 1:17-cv-6236 COMPLAINT

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION

Case 4:16-cv Document 1 Filed 11/15/16 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT

Case 1:16-cv BMC Document 8 Filed 08/16/16 Page 1 of 93 PageID #: 73 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT. Civil Action No JURY TRIAL DEMANDED

Case 8:17-cv EAK-JSS Document 114 Filed 07/30/18 Page 1 of 11 PageID 2433 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TAMPA DIVISION

Case 1:08-cv WMS Document 1 Filed 12/08/08 Page 1 of 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Case 1:18-cv Document 1 Filed 05/22/18 Page 1 of 14 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS COMPLAINT AND JURY DEMAND

Case 2:11-cv ECR -PAL Document 1 Filed 02/25/11 Page 1 of 6

Case 1:16-cv UNA Document 1 Filed 12/08/16 Page 1 of 8 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

Case 2:16-cv MRH Document 1 Filed 10/19/16 Page 1 of 5 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Case 1:07-cv GEL Document 1 Filed 07/05/2007 Page 1 of 6

Case5:14-cv PSG Document1 Filed10/10/14 Page1 of 10. Attorneys for Plaintiff ENPHASE ENERGY, INC. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

Case 1:99-mc Document 689 Filed 12/01/11 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

COMPLAINT. Plaintiff, The Green Pet Shop Enterprises, LLC ( Green Pet Shop or. Plaintiff ), by and through its attorneys, THE RANDO LAW FIRM P.C.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE. Plaintiff, C.A. No. COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT THE PARTIES

Case 5:16-cv Document 1 Filed 11/28/16 Page 1 of 10 PageID #: 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Case 1:10-cv Document 1 Filed 02/09/10 Page 1 of 5 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

Case 2:16-cv RJS Document 2 Filed 09/29/16 Page 1 of 15

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Case 1:14-cv Document 1 Filed 02/18/14 Page 1 of 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS AUSTIN DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION

Case 2:16-cv Document 1 Filed 12/05/16 Page 1 of 5 PageID #: 1

Case 3:16-cv MEJ Document 1 Filed 06/16/16 Page 1 of 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case 1:18-cv Document 1 Filed 11/30/18 Page 1 of 7 PageID #: 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISON COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT THE PARTIES

Case 6:15-cv Document 1 Filed 01/13/15 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION COMPLAINT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Case: 5:17-cv DCR Doc #: 1 Filed: 01/06/17 Page: 1 of 5 - Page ID#: 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK COMPLAINT

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA. Plaintiff, for its complaint, by and through its attorney, alleges that:

COMPLAINT FOR DESIGN PATENT INFRINGEMENT

COMPLAINT FOR VIOLATIONS OF THE LANHAM ACT AND TRADEMARK INFRINGMENT

Case 2:18-cv JJT Document 1 Filed 02/06/18 Page 1 of 5 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA. Defendant.

Case 2:17-cv Document 1 Filed 12/29/17 Page 1 of 22 Page ID #:1

Case 2:16-cv Document 1 Filed 04/25/16 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 1

Case 4:16-cv Document 1 Filed 10/18/16 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 1

Case 1:11-cv REB Document 1 Filed 12/15/11 Page 1 of 5

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT

Courthouse News Service

Case 2:16-cv Document 1 Filed 12/09/16 Page 1 of 8 PageID #: 1

Case 9:16-cv RLR Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/15/2016 Page 1 of 6

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE. Plaintiff, Civil Action No. COMPLAINT

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE ) ) ) Plaintiff,

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA JOHN JOSEPH BENGIS, an individual,

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Case 2:14-cv Document 1 Filed 10/10/14 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

Case 2:16-cv Document 1 Filed 10/11/16 Page 1 of 10 PageID #: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Case 2:14-cv JRG-RSP Document 9 Filed 08/08/14 Page 1 of 5 PageID #: 227

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA ASHEVILLE DIVISION CIVIL ACTION NO.: 1:16-CV-381 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case 3:17-cv AJB-KSC Document 1 Filed 05/23/17 PageID.1 Page 1 of 8

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION. Case No. 3:13-cv N

Transcription:

Case 1:10-cv-11064 Document 1 Filed 06/22/10 Page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS PETEDGE, INC., Civil Action No. Plaintiff, JURY TRIAL DEMANDED v. HAMMACHER, SCHLEMMER & COMPANY, INC., Defendant. COMPLAINT Plaintiff PetEdge, Inc., complains against defendant Hammacher, Schlemmer & Company, Inc., as follows: PARTIES 1. PetEdge is a corporation organized and existing under the laws of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts and has its principal place of business at 100 Cummings Center, Beverly, Massachusetts 01915. 2. PetEdge is in the business of designing, sourcing, manufacturing, and distributing pet-related merchandise. 3. PetEdge invented a folding pet ramp and steps apparatus and owns a patent directed to various embodiments of this apparatus, namely U.S. Patent No. 7,621,236 ( the 236 patent. A copy of the patent is attached as Exhibit A. PetEdge manufactures and sells a folding pet ramp and steps embodying inventions claims in this patent.

Case 1:10-cv-11064 Document 1 Filed 06/22/10 Page 2 of 5 4. On information and belief, Hammacher Schlemmer is a corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of New York and has its principal place of business at 9307 N. Milwaukee Avenue, Niles, Illinois 60714. 5. On information and belief, Hammacher Schlemmer manufactures, uses, offers to sell, and/or sells an expansive array of home goods, including pet-related merchandise. 6. Hammacher Schlemmer s pet-related merchandise includes two folding pet ramps and staircases--a two-step version and a three-step version A copy of an excerpt from the Hammacher Schlemmer website, www.hammacher.com, featuring both versions of the folding pet ramp and staircase, is attached as Exhibit B. 7. Hammacher Schlemmer s activities have been without express or implied license from PetEdge. JURISDICTION AND VENUE 8. This is an action for patent infringement arising under the Patent Laws of the United States, Title 35, United States Code. This Court has jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. 1331 (federal question, 1332 (diversity, and 1338 (patent actions. 9. Venue is proper under 28 U.S.C. 1391(b and (c and 1400(b. Hammacher Schlemmer has committed and/or threatened to commit acts of infringement in this District, and this action arises from those acts. Hammacher Schlemmer has regularly engaged in business in this Commonwealth and District and purposefully availed itself of the privilege of conducting business in this District, for example, by offering for sale and selling The Pet Ramp and Staircase in this District. THE PATENT INFRINGED 10. On November 24, 2009, the United States Patent and Trademark Office ( USPTO issued United States Patent No. 7,621,236, entitled Folding Pet Ramp and Steps 2

Case 1:10-cv-11064 Document 1 Filed 06/22/10 Page 3 of 5 ( the 236 patent. The 236 patent was assigned to PetEdge, which owns the full right, title, and interest in it. A copy of the 236 patent is attached as Exhibit A. valid. 11. The 236 patent has not expired and is in full force and effect. 12. Pursuant to 35 U.S.C. 282, the 236 patent and each of its claims are presumed COUNT I DEFENDANT S INFRINGEMENT OF THE 236 PATENT 13. PetEdge realleges and incorporates by reference paragraphs 1-12 above as though fully set out herein. 14. In violation of 35 U.S.C. 271(a, (b, and (c, Hammacher Schlemmer has been and still is infringing, contributing to, and/or actively inducing infringement of the 236 patent by manufacturing, using, offering to sell, and/or selling within the United States folding pet ramps and staircases, such as those depicted in Exhibit B, that are covered by one or more claims of the 236 patent. 15. Hammacher Schlemmer has profited and continues to profit from its manufacture, use, offers to sell, and sale of the infringing folding pet ramp and steps. 16. Upon information and belief, Hammacher Schlemmer s infringement of the 236 patent has been and continues to be willful, wanton, and deliberate. For example, Hammacher Schlemmer had notice of this patent and was previously told, in communications with PetEdge, that the pet ramp/steps products it is selling fall within the scope of PetEdge s patent. In or about June 2009, PetEdge notified Hammacher Schlemmer about the published application (U.S. 2008/0302312 A1, published December 11, 2008, and attached as Exhibit C that resulted in the 236 patent. The 236 patent issued with claims that are substantially identical to the claims of the published application. Hammacher Schlemmer acknowledged the then-pending patent but 3

Case 1:10-cv-11064 Document 1 Filed 06/22/10 Page 4 of 5 declined to take a license from PetEdge or to stop selling its accused products. Hammacher Schlemmer continues to sell the products and to flout PetEdge s patent rights. 17. PetEdge has been and continues to be damaged and irreparably harmed by Hammacher Schlemmer s infringement of the 236 Patent. WHEREFORE, PetEdge respectfully asks this Court to enter judgment for PetEdge and against Hammacher Schlemmer and to grant PetEdge the following relief: A. A Judgment under 35 U.S.C. 271 finding that Hammacher Schlemmer infringes the 236 patent; B. An order under 35 U.S.C. 283 preliminarily and permanently enjoining Hammacher Schlemmer from infringing the 236 patent; C. An award of damages under 35 U.S.C. 284 adequate to compensate PetEdge for Hammacher Schlemmer s infringement of the 236 patent and an accounting to determine the proper amount of such damages; D. An award of a reasonable royalty under 35 U.S.C. 154(d for the period from the date of publication to the date that the 236 patent issued; E. A three-fold increase in damages as a result of Hammacher Schlemmer s willful, wanton, and deliberate acts of infringement; F. An award pursuant to 35 U.S.C. 284 of costs and prejudgment and post judgment interest on PetEdge s compensatory damages; G. An award pursuant to 35 U.S.C. 285 of PetEdge s attorney s fees incurred in this action; H. An order directing the recall of any and all existing Hammacher Schlemmer folding pet ramp and step systems that infringe the 236 patent; and 4

Case 1:10-cv-11064 Document 1 Filed 06/22/10 Page 5 of 5 I. Such further relief as this Court deems just and proper. JURY DEMAND PetEdge demands a trial by jury on all issues so triable. Dated: June 22, 2010 PETEDGE, INC. By its Attorneys, /s/erik Paul Belt Erik Paul Belt, BBO # 558620 Lori J. Shyavitz, BBO # 650172 McCARTER & ENGLISH, LLP 265 Franklin Street Boston, MA 02110 Tel. (617 449-6500 Fax (617 607-9200 E-mail: ebelt@mccarter.com E-mail: lshyavitz@mccarter.com 5