Foreclosure Litigation Overview

Similar documents
IN THE COMMON PLEAS COURT OF FAIRFIELD COUNTY, OHIO. Plaintiff, : Case No. 15 CV 030. v. : Judge Berens

IN THE COMMON PLEAS COURT OF FAIRFIELD COUNTY, OHIO. PNC BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, Plaintiff, : Case No. 16 CV 137. v.

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS ELEVENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT LAKE COUNTY, OHIO

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF MARYLAND. This Court s Standing Committee on Rules of Practice and

Court of Appeals of Ohio

Foreclosure Actions Based on Breach of Contract

Mortgage who is the mortgagee? Is the mortgagee the Plaintiff? Is the mortgagee a corporation or a trust?

STANDING COMMITTEE ON RULES OF PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE NOTICE OF PROPOSED RULES CHANGES. The Rules Committee has submitted its One Hundred Seventy-

Defendant answers as follows:

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO SIXTH APPELLATE DISTRICT LUCAS COUNTY. Appellants Decided: March 20, 2015 * * * * * * * * * * I.

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS SEVENTH DISTRICT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION

FIFTH DISTRICT. PRESIDING JUSTICE STEWART delivered the opinion of the court:

Chapter 355. (House Bill 728) Residential Property Foreclosure Required Documents Timing of Mediation

STATE OF MAINE SUPREME JUDICIAL COURT AMENDMENTS TO THE MAINE RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE. Effective: January 14, 2011

ROUNDTABLE DISCUSSION on FED. HOME LOAN MTGE. CORP. v. SCHWARTZWALD

STATE OF OHIO ) IN THE COURT OF APPEALS NINTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COUNTY OF SUMMIT ) DECISION AND JOURNAL ENTRY

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE SEVENTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR BROWARD COUNTY, FLORIDA,

COURT OF APPEALS STARK COUNTY, OHIO FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P

NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION ONE

Referred to Committee on Judiciary. SUMMARY Revises provisions relating to the Foreclosure Mediation Program. (BDR 9-488)

STATE OF RHODE ISLAND AND PROVIDENCE PLANTATIONS. (Filed: May 17, 2012)

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED OF FLORIDA

Ventures Trust 2013-I-H-R v Tsimmer 2017 NY Slip Op 30570(U) March 23, 2017 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: /15 Judge: Barbara

NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P : : : : Appellee : : v. : : DARIA M. VIOLA, : : Appellant : No.

NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P : : : Appellants : No: 1437 EDA 2016

LaSalle Bank, N.A. v Rodriguez 2011 NY Slip Op 31086(U) April 28, 2011 Sup Ct, Queens County Docket Number: 5129/07 Judge: Allan B.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION VS. CIVIL ACTION H OPINION AND ORDER

NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P

Case: HRT Doc#:79 Filed:08/13/14 Entered:08/13/14 15:27:11 Page1 of 11

FORECLOSURE FAQ WHERE IS A FORECLOSURE COMPLAINT FILED?

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO TENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT


NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR MONTGOMERY COUNTY, OHIO. Plaintiff-Appellee : C.A. CASE NO v. : T.C. NO. 13CV835

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT S MOTION FOR ATTORNEY S FEES AND COSTS. THIS MATTER came before the Court upon Defendant s Motion for Attorney s Fees

RULE 4:64. Foreclosure Of Mortgages, Condominium Association Liens And Tax Sale Certificates

Medina County Court of Common Pleas. Rules of the General Division

ALABAMA COURT OF CIVIL APPEALS

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

MetLaw Benefit Definitions & Reimbursements

ARKANSAS COURT OF APPEALS

State of New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division Third Judicial Department

#CTtalk. Bond in Lieu of Property. Something New in Mechanics Lien Law THE PETITION TO SUBSTITUTE A BOND FOR PROPERTY WHO?

STATE OF OHIO ) IN THE COURT OF APPEALS NINTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COUNTY OF LORAIN ) DECISION AND JOURNAL ENTRY

New Jersey Foreclosure Process 2016 A Guide for Homeowners

Deutsche Bank Natl. Trust Co. v McLean-Chance 2013 NY Slip Op 32606(U) October 17, 2013 Supreme Court, Queens County Docket Number: 11828/2012 Judge:

mg Doc 1 Filed 02/11/15 Entered 02/11/15 11:00:30 Main Document Pg 1 of 9

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS ELEVENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT PORTAGE COUNTY, OHIO

6. Finding on the mortgage or lien, including priority and entitlement to foreclose.

Alliance Bank & Trust Company ( Alliance Bank ) ( First Motion to Compel ); Plaintiffs

NO. CAAP IN THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF HAWAI'I

Commonwealth of Kentucky Court of Appeals

Senate Bill No. 306 Senators Ford and Hammond

IN THE COMMON PLEAS COURT OF FAIRFIELD COUNTY, OHIO. Plaintiff, : Case No. 12CV557. v. : Judge Berens

MORTGAGE FORECLOSURE IN A NUTSHELL

COURT OF APPEALS FAIRFIELD COUNTY, OHIO FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

FILED: WESTCHESTER COUNTY CLERK 03/22/ :11 PM INDEX NO /2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 22 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 03/22/2016

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT. v. Case No. 5D

Referred to Committee on Judiciary. SUMMARY Revises provisions governing real property. (BDR 3-855)

STATE OF OHIO, MAHONING COUNTY IN THE COURT OF APPEALS SEVENTH DISTRICT ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Reversed and Remanded

IN THE COMMON PLEAS COURT OF FAIRFIELD COUNTY, OHIO. Plaintiff, : Case No. 11 CV 233. v. : Judge Berens

LOCAL RULES OF THE DISTRICT COURT. [Adapted from the Local Rules for the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Indiana]

110 High St. LLC v 110 High St NY Slip Op 33076(U) December 27, 2012 Supreme Court, Wayne County Docket Number: 74322/2012 Judge: Dennis M.

ST.A T:: o r:- MArN. Cumber, 6 -~.., E: -, " ~"' C'erk's Office. JUL 1,.a RE Cc. /VEO

Defendants Black Bear Industrial Inc., Jeffrey P. Richard, and Northern Mountain I. BACKGROUND

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION

1900 Fifth Third Center Suite 2B 511 Walnut Street Dublin, Ohio Cincinnati, Ohio

Circuit Court for Harford County Case No. 12-C UNREPORTED IN THE COURT OF SPECIAL APPEALS OF MARYLAND. No September Term, 2015

DECISION AND ORDER. Ford Motor Credit Company ( Ford ) has filed a Complaint for Foreclosure

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK TRANSCRIPT OF CHAPTER 13 HEARING RE:

In the District Court of Appeal Second District of Florida

NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P

NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P

United States District Court District of Massachusetts

(Reprinted with amendments adopted on May 17, 2017) SECOND REPRINT S.B. 33. Referred to Committee on Judiciary

Argued September 26, 2017 Decided. Before Judges Hoffman and Mayer.

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS. i, D: ~TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT DECISION AND JOURNAL ENTRY

No. 107,999 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF KANSAS. BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., Successor by merger to BAC HOME LOANS SERVICING, L.P.

CHAPTER 224 CHATTEL BUILDINGS SECURITY

Plaintiff ORDER ON MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT. The plaintiff moves for summary judgment in an action for foreclosure

2015 IL App (1st) U. No IN THE APPELLATE COURT OF ILLINOIS FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT

NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P

Park Natl. Bank v Lops 2011 NY Slip Op 32505(U) September 16, 2011 Sup Ct, Nassau County Docket Number: Judge: Steven M. Jaeger Republished

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

Party-In-Interest. Before the Court is the Plaintiffs motion for summary judgment in its action seeking

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT July Term 2011

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA

Bank of N.Y. Mellon v Arthur 2013 NY Slip Op 32625(U) October 23, 2013 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: /2010 Judge: Cynthia S.

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF IDAHO. Docket No ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT PICKAWAY COUNTY APPEARANCES:

IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA. Chapter 11 Plaintiff.

Wachovia Bank of Delaware, NA v Henderson 2015 NY Slip Op 31324(U) June 19, 2015 Supreme Court, Queens County Docket Number: 16701/2010 Judge: Robert

PROPERTY BOND PACKET

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO TENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

Transcription:

Foreclosure Litigation Overview I. Check attorney / client status A. Advise the client about the differences between mediation and litigation. B. Litigation retainer. C. Entry of appearance. II. Review the procedural status of the case when it was stayed for mediation, and address any issues. A. You should do the following if the client did not file an Answer or a Leave to Plead prior to mediation. i. Immediately move for leave to file an Answer instanter. Otherwise, Plaintiff may seek default judgment within days after mediation terminates. i If Plaintiff has already moved for a default judgment, file a Brief in Opposition (move for leave to file instanter if necessary) You should also appear at the default hearing and ask the Court to grant your motions and deny the Motion for Default Judgment. Typically the Court will not grant the default judgment if you and the homeowner appear at the hearing. B. If the client filed only a Leave to Plead before mediation was approved, file an Answer instanter as soon as possible after mediation terminates. C. If the client filed a pro se Answer before mediation was approved, you can seek leave to file an Amended Answer and Counter-Claim if applicable. I usually style the motion as one for leave to answer or otherwise respond. D. You should do the following if the plaintiff moved for summary judgment before mediation was approved. i. File a Civ. R. 56(F) motion requesting a continuance so that you can obtain discovery. a) Remember to include an affidavit from the client. b) You may want to serve discovery before or contemporaneously with the 56(F) motion.

E. Caveat for Lorain County. i. Lorain County differs because the magistrates conduct settlement conferences, not mediations. Since you are before the magistrate, you should ask the Magistrate to set a trial schedule that addresses these issues if there is no settlement. F.Some judges and magistrates will set a quick trial schedule. III. Determine and implement litigation strategy A. Joining additional parties (such as servicers, mortgage brokers, appraisers, etc.). i. Need to distinguish between Civ. R. 13(H), Joinder of additional parties; Civ. R. 14(A), When defendant may bring in third party; and filing a separate claim and then moving to consolidate under Civ. R. 42(C). Using the proper procedure to join new parties and claims is critical to obtaining jurisdiction and avoiding dismissal. Feel free to contact Legal Aid with procedure and strategy questions about joinder of new parties and claims. B. Always serve discovery. i. Feel free to contact Legal Aid for sample discovery requests relevant to your case. Interrogatories. a) In addition to substantive interrogatories, ask Plaintiff to identify people with knowledge and any experts it plans to use at trial. b) Plaintiff must automatically supplement its responses under Civ. R. 26(E)(1). i Requests for Production of Documents. a) Ask for electronic records. b) Ask for Fidelity / LPS Software (contains almost all notes) c) Ask for documents from WebEx or other imaging system. Ask for all documents. 2

iv. Requests for Inspection. a) Use this to review the original promissory note and other documents. v. Requests for Admissions. vi. Civ. R. 30(B)(5) Depositions C. Opposing a Motion for Summary Judgment. i. Substantive issues. a) FHA loans: Did lender comply with HUD regulations and satisfy loss mitigation requirements prior to commencing foreclosure? i ii iii iv Argue that compliance is a condition precedent to acceleration or foreclosure. The starting point is 24 C.F.R. 203.500: It is the intent of the Department that no mortgagee shall commence foreclosure or acquire title to a property until the requirements of this subpart have been followed. The term subpart refers to 24 C.F.R. 203.500-203.685. The standard FHA mortgage form contains the following language in Paragraph 9: Regulations of HUD Secretary. In many circumstances regulations issued by the Secretary will limit Lender s rights, in the case of payment defaults, to require immediate payment in full and foreclose if not paid. This Security Instrument does not authorize acceleration or foreclosure if not permitted by regulations of the Secretary. This argument is usually raised because lender did not make a reasonable effort to arrange a face-to-face meeting with the mortgagor. 24 C.F.R. 203.604(d). But the argument can be raised for other violations, including a failure to consider all loss mitigation options. 24 CFR 203.605. b) U.C.C. issues: Article 3 of Ohio s U.C.C. governs most promissory notes. i ii Determine if the note is negotiable. See R.C. 1303.03(A). Determine if the Plaintiff is entitled to enforce the note. See R.C.1303.31. 3

iii Determine if Plaintiff is a holder in due curse. R.C. 1303.32. c) General standing issues: Was plaintiff the owner and holder of the note and mortgage at the time foreclosure action was filed? Are there gaps in the chain of title? d) Standing issues related to securitization: Is plaintiff the trustee of a trust? If so, did the trust timely obtain ownership of the loan, according to the guidelines set forth in the applicable Pooling and Servicing Agreement (a copy of which can often be obtained on the SEC s Edgar website)? e) Loan origination issues: Are there problems related to the loan application, loan closing, or closing paperwork, and do those facts warrant denial of summary judgment with respect to Plaintiff? f) Are there other material fact issues related to other defenses or counterclaims? g) Equity issues: Determine if it would be inequitable under the facts of the case to foreclose. Procedural issues. a) Make sure the Plaintiff disclosed the affiant in response to an interrogatory requesting Plaintiff identify all people with knowledge. b) Argue that the Plaintiff / Movant must satisfy all elements of its case in chief. See Wachovia Bank of Delaware, N.A. v. Jackson (5th Dist. 2011), 2011-Ohio-3202. i Evidentiary issues. a) Determine if affiant satisfied Evid. R. 803(6). b) Determine if Plaintiff properly authenticated the documents. D. What to do if the client receives an adverse decision. i. Magistrates decide most cases. See Civ. R. 53. i Always ask for findings of facts and conclusions of law. Critical, if a Magistrate issues the decision, you must object to the decision as set forth in Civ. R. 53. 4

iv. You waive the right to appeal any finding of fact or conclusion of law if you do not object under Civ. R. 53. (See the caselaw for exceptions). IV. When to return a case to mediation. A. Bases for going back into mediation. i. Household income has increased. i Change in eligibility for Save the Dream funds (formerly known as Restoring Stability funds). Client may be eligible for a new program. For example: a) The Treasury Department lifted the twelve-month restriction on FHA HAMP. b) HAMP Tier II was instituted last year. iv. Client no longer wants to stay in the house, and mediation can be used to negotiate a short sale or deed-in-lieu of foreclosure. v. Litigation merits are not as strong as previously thought, but client has financial resources that make it feasible to save the house. B. Procedure for getting back into mediation. i. You can submit a new Request for Mediation form to the Mediation Department. In the alternative, you can file a motion to refer the case back to mediation. Sometimes the other side will join in that motion. 5