Criminal Law Outline intent crime

Similar documents
Second Look Series CRIMINAL LAW OUTLINE

GOULD S BAR EXAM FLASH CARDS FOR CRIMINAL LAW

I. Limits of Criminal law a. Due process b. Principle of legality c. Void for vagueness II. Mental State a. Traditional law i.

ESSAY APPROACH. Bar Exam Doctor BAREXAMDOCTOR.COM. CRIMINAL LAW ESSAY

CRIMINAL LAW OUTLINE1

The Sources of and Limits on Criminal Law 1

Question What criminal charges, if any, should be brought against Art and Ben? Discuss.

OBJECTIVES: Differentiate between federal and state laws and develop understanding between crimes against people, and crimes against property.

UNIT 2 Part 1 CRIMINAL LAW

JEFFERSON COLLEGE COURSE SYLLABUS CRJ112 CRIMINAL LAW. 3 Credit Hours. Prepared by: Mark A. Byington

necessity of, in <:rime, as affecting criminal responsiboity, INDEX. ABANDONMENT: of the criminal act,

JEFFERSON COLLEGE COURSE SYLLABUS CRJ112 CRIMINAL LAW. 3 Credit Hours. Prepared by: Mark A. Byington

CRIMINAL LAW CHART OF BLACK LETTER LAW DEFINITIONS & ELEMENTS

Question With what crime or crimes should Dan be charged? Discuss. 2. What defense or defenses might Dan assert? Discuss.

CRIMINAL LAW ESSAY SERIES ESSAY QUESTION #2 MODEL ANSWER. 1. With what crime or crimes should Dan be charged? Discuss.

Criminal Law Outline

Criminal Justice: A Brief Introduction Twelfth Edition

MBE WORKSHOP: CRIMINAL LAW PROFESSOR LISA MCELROY DREXEL UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF LAW

Contents PART 1: CRIMINAL LIABILITY. Table of Statutes. Table of Secondary Legislation. Table of Cases

Administrative-Master Syllabus form approved June/2006 revised Page 1 of 1

SIMULATED MBE ANALYSIS: CRIMINAL LAW & PROCEDURE PROFESSOR ROBERT PUSHAW PEPPERDINE UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF LAW

CRIMINAL LAW TJ MCINTYRE SEAN Ô TOGHDA

CRM 321 Mod 5 Lecture Notes

Question 2. With what crimes, if any, could Al be charged and what defenses, if any, could he assert? Discuss.

QUESTION What charges can reasonably be brought against Steve? Discuss. 2. What charges can reasonably be brought against Will? Discuss.

2012 Fall CRIMINAL LAW HOLLAND

1. Some thing that must be proved but is not necessarily in control b. Mens Rea i. Model Penal Code 1. Four mindsets a. Purpose conscious object b.

Criminal Law. Text, Cases, and Materials. Janet Loveless. Third Edition UNIVERSITY PRESS

CHAPTER 14. Criminal Law and Juvenile Law

CRIMINAL LAW. Sweet &. Maxwell's Textbook Series. 4th edition

State Qualifying Exam Preparation Guide

Question Are Mel and/or Brent guilty of: a. Murder? Discuss. b. Attempted murder? Discuss. c. Conspiracy to commit murder? Discuss.

Introduction to Criminal Law

Criminal Law Outline

CHAPTER. Criminal Law

BAREXAMDOCTOR.COM UNLIMITED ESSAYS AND PTS ONLINE! FULL OUTLINE. Bar Exam Doctor. CRIMINAL LAW

Chapter 8. Criminal Wrongs. Civil and Criminal Law. Classification of Crimes

CRIMINAL LAW FINAL EXAM JOHNF.KENNEDYUNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF LAW Fall 2013 Ian Kelley MODEL / SAMPLE ANSWER

Credit: 3 semester credit hours Prerequisite/Co-requisite: None. Course Description. Required Textbook and Materials

Section 20 Mistake as to a Justification 631. Chapter 4. Offenses Against the Person Article 1. Homicide Section Murder in the First Degree

Particular Crimes can be grouped under 3 headings: Crimes against people Crimes against property Crimes against business interests

1 California Criminal Law (4th), Crimes Against the Person

1. The physical element of a crime is the a. mens rea b. actus reus c. offence d. intention

A CASEBOOK ON SCOTTISH CRIMINAL LAW

Question What legal justification, if any, did Dan have (a) pursuing Al, and (b) threatening Al with deadly force? Discuss.

Question 2. Dawn lives in an apartment with her dog Fluffy and her boyfriend Bill. A year ago Bill began buying and selling illegal drugs.

MPC. Common Law. Strict Liability No strict liability except for violations

Massachusetts Bar Exam Review: CRIMINAL LAW: February 1998 Page 1 of 22

Chapter 4-1 Criminal Law

CRIMINAL LAW & PROCEDURE

PEARCE MICRO REVIEW Criminal Law & Procedure

CHAPTER 1 CHAPTER OUTLINE. Federalism

BUSINESS LAW Chapter 3 PowerPoint Notes & Assignment Criminal Law

Class Hours: Program is available 24/7/365. Support is available via , course forums and scheduled support sessions

Business Law Chapter 9 Handout

Criminal Justice in America CJ Chapter 4 James J. Drylie, Ph.D.

DETAILED CONTENTS. Preface xi. 2. Constitutional Limitations The Nature, Purpose, and Function of Criminal Law 1

CRIMINAL LAW: TEXT AND MATERIALS

UNIFORM FELONY BAIL SCHEDULE (PENAL CODE)

Peak, Introduction to Criminal Justice, 2e. Chapter 2 Foundations of Law and Crime: Nature, Elements, and Defenses

Criminal Law, Class #525_0AC_5101, with Duncan M START OF EXAM. In CL: He should not prevail. In CL, once an attempt has been made, D cannot

692 Part VI.b Excuse Defenses

2012 FELONY AND MISDEMEANOR BAIL SCHEDULE COUNTY OF IMPERIAL

Summer 2008 August 1, 2008 SAMPLE ANSWER TO FINAL EXAM MULTIPLE CHOICE

Question 3. What crimes, if any, can Deanna and Alma reasonably be charged with, and what defenses might each assert? Discuss.

TIER 2 EXCLUSIONARY CRIMES

SKILLS Workshop Series Academic Support:

STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK COLLEGE OF TECHNOLOGY CANTON, NEW YORK

Choose the best choice and mark it on your answer sheet. Part A: Fill in the Blanks

Lecture 3: The American Criminal Justice System

CRIMINAL LAW (20 OF 33 QS) (OTHER 13 ARE CRIM PRO)

Assault and Battery Common Law

Question With what crime or crimes, if any, can Dan reasonably be charged and what defenses, if any, can he reasonably assert? Discuss.

Answer A to Question 2

Criminal Law Final Outline

SYLLABUS FORM WESTCHESTER COMMUNITY COLLEGE Valhalla, NY lo595. l. COURSE #: POL NAME OF ORIGINATOR /REVISOR: Dr. David Wedlick/Stephen Arienta

BUSINESS LAW. Chapter 8 Criminal Law and Cyber Crimes

DeWolf, Final Exam Sample Answer, December 16, 2015 Page 1 of 6. Professor DeWolf Fall 2015 Criminal Law December 19, 2015 FINAL -- SAMPLE ANSWER

CRIM EXAM NOTES. Table of Contents. Weeks 1-4

BILATERAL EXTRADITION TREATIES NICARAGUA EXTRADITION. Treaty Series U.S.T. LEXIS 48; 10 Bevans 356. March 1, 1905, Date-Signed

Florida Jury Instructions. 7.2 MURDER FIRST DEGREE (1)(a), Fla. Stat.

Torts One Sheet. FYLSX One Sheets and Definitions by Ray Hayden 8 June Page 1 of 16

HSC Legal Studies. Year 2017 Mark Pages 46 Published Feb 6, Legal Studies: Crime. By Rose (99.4 ATAR)

H 5695 SUBSTITUTE A ======== LC001230/SUB A/2 ======== S T A T E O F R H O D E I S L A N D

The defendant has been charged with first degree murder.

Course Outline. TERM EFFECTIVE: Spring 2018 CURRICULUM APPROVAL DATE: 05/08/2017

FALL 2011 December 12, 2011 FINAL EXAM SAMPLE ANSWER MULTIPLE CHOICE

COURSE SYLLABUS. SOCIOLOGY 485B: CRIMINAL LAW AND LEGAL ANALYSIS Professor Bruce Zucker Spring 2017

SCHEDULE OF LESSER INCLUDED OFFENSES COMMENT ON SCHEDULE OF LESSER INCLUDED OFFENSES

CRIMINAL LAW. Course Goals: My goals for this course are for you to:

Criminal Law and Procedure

Criminal Law Spring 2002

Comparative Criminal Law

New Zealand International Extradition Treaty with the United States

Guatemala International Extradition Treaty with the United States

FALL 2004 December 11, 2004 SAMPLE ANSWER TO FINAL EXAM MULTIPLE CHOICE

Criminal Law II Overview Jan June 2006

AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE GOVERNMENT OF HONG KONG AND THE GOVERNMENT OF THE REPUBLIC OF INDONESIA FOR THE SURRENDER OF FUGITIVE OFFENDERS

Criminal Law Doctrine and Theory

Preface The Case Method Chapter Organizations Organization of the Text Acknowledgments The Nature, Purpose, And Constitutional Context Of Criminal

Transcription:

This outline was created for the July 2006 Oregon bar exam. The law changes over time, so use with caution. If you would like an editable version of this outline, go to www.barexammind.com/outlines. Criminal Law Outline I. Jursidiction and General Matters a. Jurisdiction i. Situs of the crime is where the act or omission takes place and creates jurisdiction (NB: gunshot across state lines killing gives jurisdiction to both states) b. Merger i. CL ii. Modern Law No Merger 1. exceptions: solicitation and attempt merge into completed crime a. NB: conspiracy NEVER merges 2. Never merge crimes with different victims (eg, transferred intent crimes of attempted murder and murder) II. Essential Elements of a Crime a. Elements of a crime b. Physical act (Actus Reus) i. The act must be voluntary 1. the following are NOT voluntary: a. conduct that is not the product of the actor s determination b. reflexive or convulsive acts (eg, seizure) c. acts performed while D is unconscious or asleep (but if fall asleep while driving, liable) ii. Omission as an Act 1. generally, no legal duty to act, but can arise in 5 situation: a. by statute b. by contract c. by relationship (eg, spouse, children) d. by voluntary assumption of care ( I ll save him ) e. if D created peril for victim c. Mental State (Mens Rea): 4 CL levels of mental state i. Specific intent 1. Crimes: a. Solicitation, attempt, conspiracy b. First degree premeditated murder 1 c. Assault (only the intent to commit battery type) 1 NB: if MBE says murder it means CL malice murder (aka murder in 2 nd degree) and is therefore NOT a specific intent crime www.barexammind.com -- 1

d. Larceny, robbery, burglary, forgery, false pretenses, embezzlement 2. Permits applicability of certain defenses: a. Voluntary intoxication b. Unreasonable mistake of fact ii. Malice: 1. only two crimes here: CL Murder and CL Arson iii. General Intent 1. catch all 2. examples include: rape and battery 3. transferred intent: normally applied to homicide, battery, and arson; does NOT apply to attempt iv. Strict liability offenses 1. elements: a. an administrative, regulatory, or morality offense; and b. no adverbs in statutory description 2. significance: a. any defense negating intent is inapplicable d. Concurrence of mental fault with physical act e. Causation III. Accomplice liability a. General Rule: accomplices are liable for crime itself and all other foreseeable crimes b. Accomplice i. Must be actually involved (committed, aids, counsels, or encourages) ii. Mere presence not enough (even if appears to consent to crime) IV. Inchoate Offenses a. Solicitation i. Is asking someone to commit a crime; crime is complete after asking ii. No Defenses (unless excluded by legislative intent: minor exclude from soliciting statutory rape) iii. Merges with completed crime b. Conspiracy i. Elements 1. an agreement between two or more person (need not be express; can be shown by concert of action) 2. intent to enter into an agreement 3. intent to achieve the unlawful objective of the agreement 4. overt act in furtherance (may be merely preparatory) a. overt act required by majority rule b. minority rule only required agreement ii. Liability for co-conspirator s crimes if: 1. crimes were committed in furtherance of the objectives of the conspiracy; and 2. crimes were a foreseeable consequence of conspiracy iii. Defenses: withdrawal: www.barexammind.com -- 2

1. affirmative act notifying all members of the conspiracy of withdrawal; and 2. notice must be given so conspirators have opportunity to abandon plans iv. Punishment No merger v. Number of conspiracies in Multiple party situations; conspirators need not know each other 1. chain conspiracy 2. hub and spoke conspiracy c. Attempt i. Is a specific intent to commit a crime plus a substantial step, beyond mere prep, in the direction of commission of the crime ii. Defenses iii. Prosecution for attempt merger V. Responsibility and Criminal Capacity a. Insanity: know the trigger words i. M Naghten Rule 1. at the time of his conduct, D lacked the ability to know the wrongfulness of his actions or understand the nature and quality of his actions ii. Irresistible Impulse Test 1. D lacked the capacity for self control and free choice (unable to conform to the law) iii. Durham (Or New Hampshire) Test 1. D s conduct was the product of a mental disease or defect iv. ALI or MPC test 1. D lacked ability to appreciate criminality of conduct or to conform his conduct to requirements of the law v. Procedural issues 1. is a defense to ALL crimes, including strict liability vi. Post-acquittal commitment to mental institution vii. Mental condition during criminal proceedings viii. Diminished capacity b. Intoxication i. Voluntary intoxication 1. a defense only to specific intent crimes ii. Involuntary intoxication 1. considered a form of insanity and thus usable for all crimes c. Infancy i. Under 7, no criminal liability ii. Under 14, rebuttable presumption that no criminal liability VI. Principles of Exculpation a. Justification i. Self-defense www.barexammind.com -- 3

1. Non-deadly force: person can use force that reasonably appears necessary to protect himself from imminent use of unlawful force upon herself 2. Deadly force: a. Majority rule: may use any time person reasonably believes that deadly for will be used on him b. Minority rule: must first retreat to wall if safe, EXCEPT: i. Where attack is in victim s home ii. Victim is a cop who is making an arrest iii. Victim is being robbed or raped c. Original Aggressor may use deadly force if: i. Effectively removes himself from fight; and ii. Communicates desire to remove to other party ii. Defense of others iii. Defense of a dwelling 1. general rule: deadly force cannot be used merely to defend property b. Excuse of Duress i. Available in all crimes except homicide ii. Duress is threat of imminent bodily to person or member of immediate family c. Other defenses i. Mistake or ignorance of Fact Mental State Application of Defense Specific intent Any mistake (no matter how unreasonable) will work Malice/General Intent Reasonable mistake only Strict Liability Never applicable ii. Mistake of ignorance of Law No Defense iii. Consent 1. consent of victim almost NEVER a defense; don t fall for it on Exam iv. Entrapment: very narrow defense 1. if D has predisposition to commit the crime, it negates defense. VII. Offenses against the person a. Assault and battery i. Battery: a completed assault (NB: general intent crime) ii. Assault: two kinds at CL: 1. attempt to commit a battery (specific intent) 2. threat creating reasonable apprehension of imminent bodily harm (general intent) b. Mayhem c. Homicide: i. CL criminal homicides 1. murder (four kinds) www.barexammind.com -- 4

a. intent to kill b. intent to inflict great bodily injury c. highly reckless and indifferent to unjustifiably high risk to human life (ie, depraved heart murder) d. intent to commit felony (ie, felony murder) 2. voluntary manslaughter a. killing with adequate provocation (ie, in heat of passion) i. NB: mere words not adequate 3. involuntary manslaughter (two kinds) a. criminal negligence b. misdemeanor manslaughter i. killing in course of misdeamenor or killing during unenumerated felony ii. statutory first-degree murder 1. MBE either calls it such OR gives a statute defining it iii. Defenses to Felony Murder 1. not guilty of underlying felony 2. felony is not independent of killing 3. death not a foreseeable result of the felony 4. death occurs after reaching place of temporary safety 5. co-felon is the one who died a. if innocent person dies b/c victim shoots at felon, then felon is liable for the murder d. False Imprisonment e. Kidnapping i. Aggravated Kidnapping VIII. Sex Offenses a. Rape i. Slightest penetration is sufficient ii. Absence of marital relationship iii. Lack of effective consent b. Statutory rape i. Strict liability offense c. Adultery and fornication d. Incest e. Seduction f. Bigamy IX. Property Offenses a. Larceny 1. a taking 2. and carrying away 3. of tangible personal property 5. by trespass www.barexammind.com -- 5

6. with intent (at time of taking) to permanently deprive the person of an interest in the property ii. Defense 1. if you take property in belief that it is yours or that you have some right (eg, pay a debt) to it iii. title does not pass b. Embezzlement 1. the fraudulent 2. conversion 3. of property 5. by a person in lawful possession of that property ii. title does not pass c. False Pretenses 1. obtaining title 2. to the property of another 3. by intentional (or knowing) false statement of past or present fact 4. with the intent to defraud the other ii. larceny by trick distinguished 1. obtain only possession, not title iii. The Misrepresentation Required d. Robbery = larceny + assault i. Elements 1. a taking 2. of personal property of another 3. from the other s person or presence 4. by force or intimidation 5. with intent to permanently deprive him of it ii. Distinguish Larceny e. Extortion = robbery by threat of future harm i. Distinguish robbery 1. threat need not involve immediate or physical harm 2. property need not be in victim s presence 3. eg, Give me $5,000 or I will f. Receipt of Stolen Property i. Possession ii. Stolen property g. Theft h. Forgery i. Fraudulently obtaining signature of another ii. Uttering a forged instrument i. Malicious Mischief X. Offenses against the Habitation a. Burglary www.barexammind.com -- 6

i. Elements 1. a breaking (actual/constructive) 2. and entry 3. of the dwelling 5. at nighttime 6. with the intent (at time of breaking) of committing a felony therein b. Arson 1. the malicious 2. burning (must cause material wasting to structure) 3. of the dwelling ii. Damage required iii. Related offense: Houseburning XI. Offense Involving Judicial Procedure a. Perjury b. Subornation of perjury c. Bribery d. Compounding a crime e. Misprision of a felony If you liked the outline, why not check out my e-book showing you how to reduce bar exam anxiety and enhance performance? www.barexammind.com/book www.barexammind.com -- 7