Examination Matters 2017 Webinars

Similar documents
Candidate's Answer - DI

The opposition procedure and limitation and revocation procedures

The EPO approach to Computer Implemented Inventions (CII) Yannis Skulikaris Director Operations, Information and Communications Technology

Unity of inventions at the EPO - Amendments to rule 29 EPC

EPO boards of appeal decisions. Date of decision 25 November 1987

QUESTION PAPER REFERENCE: FC3 PERCENTAGE MARK AWARDED: 59% six months after the publication of European search report

EPO Decision G 1/15 on Partial Priorities and Toxic Divisionals: Relief and Risks

pct2ep.com Guide to claim amendment after EPO regional phase entry

Allowability of disclaimers before the European Patent Office

Patents: opposition proceedings and nullity actions a comparison between Europe and Japan

R 84a EPC does not apply to filing date itself as was no due date missed. So, effective date for and contacts subject matter is

V. Patent Claim Drafting. Becky White

Amendments. Closa Daniel Beaucé Gaëtan 26-30/11/2012

should disclose the invention in a manner sufficiently clear and complete for it to be carried out by a person skilled in the art

COMMENTARY. Antidote to Toxic Divisionals European Patent Office Rules on Partial Priorities. Summary of the Enlarged Board of Appeal s Decision

IP Report Patent Law. The right of priorities: Recent developments in EPO case law Reported by Dr. Rudolf Teschemacher

The effects of the EPC

JETRO seminar. Recent Rule change and latest developments at the EPO:

Topic 12: Priority Claims and Prior Art

Added matter under the EPC. Chris Gabriel Examiner Directorate 1222

Part II. Time limit for completing the International search. Application not searched

PCT procedure before the EPO as International Authority. Camille-Rémy Bogliolo Head, Department of PCT Affairs

Foreign Patent Law. Why file foreign? Why NOT file foreign? Richard J. Melker

Patent Administrators Course 2015 Final Examination Answers

FICPI & AIPLA Colloquium, June 2007 A Comprehensive Approach to Patent Quality

DETAILED TABLE OF CONTENTS

The European Patent Office An overview on the procedures before the EPO: up to grant, opposition and appeal

Slide 13 What rights does a patent confer?

Inventive Step in Korea

Contents. I. Introduction 1. II. Filing of European patent applications 1. III. Documents which may be filed with the competent national authorities 2

Update on the patentability of inventions concerning plants and animals under the EPC SUMMARY

Inventive Step in Japan Masashi Moriwaki

ishares Core Composite Bond ETF

Note concerning the Patentability of Computer-Related Inventions

Double Patenting at the EPO

Foundation Certificate

FICPI 12 th Open Forum

News and analysis on IP law, regulation and policy from around the world. For the latest updates, visit

INVENTION DISCLOSURE FORM

Deferred examination of European patent applications. 2. German delegation 3. Netherlands delegation

Guidelines2day Roadshow for professional representatives. Programme. European Patent Academy. supported by

Demystifying Self-collision at the EPO

Basic Legal Questions for Pre-Exam and Paper D

Considerations on IP Law Enforcement in Europe

Topic 9: Utilizing Claims of Granted Patents

Comparison between Opposition Systems in Europe and Japan

CA/PL 7/99 Orig.: German Munich, SUBJECT: Revision of the EPC: Articles 52(4) and 54(5) President of the European Patent Office

PATENT COOPERATION TREATY. Date of mailing. (day/month/year) PAYMENT DUE. (day/month/year)

Disclaimers at the EPO

Partial Priorities and Transfer of Priority Rights. Dr. Joachim Renken

CEIPI Basic Training in European Patent Law Program for 1st Year 2010/2011 Subject to changes

IP LAW HARMONISATION: BEYOND THE STATUTE

Chapter 1 DEFINITION OF TERMS. There are various types of IP rights. They can be categorized as:

Patent litigation. Block 1. Module Priority. Essentials: Priority. Introduction

MULTIPLE AND PARTIAL PRIORITIES. Robert Watson FICPI 17 th Open Forum, Venice October 2017

AIPPI Study Question - Conflicting patent applications

4. COMPARISON OF THE INDIAN PATENT LAW WITH THE PATENT LAWS IN U.S., EUROPE AND CHINA

Aligning claim drafting and filing strategies to optimize protection in the EPO, GPTO and USPTO

2015 Noréns Patentbyrå AB

Unitary Patent in Europe & Unified Patent Court (UPC)

Contents. m) Amendments without support II: Disclaimers n) Corrections o) Additional limitations of pre-grant amendments p) Amendments after grant

Amendments in Europe and the United States

Intellectual Property and crystalline forms. How to get a European Patent on crystalline forms?

Fordham 2008 Comparative Obviousness

IPFocus LIFE SCIENCES 9TH EDITION WHEN IS POST-PUBLISHED EVIDENCE ACCEPTABLE? VALEA

Restriction. AIPLA Practical Patent Prosecution Alexandria, VA August Brian R. Stanton, Ph.D. US DOC/HHS (Ret.)

US Bar EPO Liaison Council 29th Annual Meeting Munich, 18 October EPO practice issues

Understanding and Utilization of the ISR and WOISA. Shunsuke YAMAMOTO Examination Standards Office Japan Patent Office

Raising the Bar and EPC changes as from 1 April 2010

Harmonisation across Europe - comparison and interaction between the EPO appeal system and the national judicial systems

Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT) Working Group

In accordance with Article 12 of the Unitary Patent Regulation, the renewal fees have to be inter alia:

Cambios en el el reglamento EPC desde el el 1 de abril de 2010: a a correr!

FC3 (P5) International Patent Law 2 FINAL Mark Scheme 2017

Benefits and Dangers of U.S. Provisional Applications

Representation before the Unified Patent Court by European Patent Attorneys. epi Board Members, National IP Associations in the EPC Member States

Criteria for Patentability

Infringement of Claims: The Doctrine of Equivalents and Related Issues German Position

and Examination Reports

FC3 International Patent Law Question Paper Sample Assessment Material

The European Patent and the UPC

AIPPI REPORT OF THE NETHERLANDS GROUP ON 2016 STUDY QUESTION (PA- TENTS) ADDED MATTER: THE STANDARD FOR DETERMINING ADEQUATE SUPPORT FOR AMENDMENTS

Patenting Software-related Inventions according to the European Patent Convention

Art. 123(2) EPC ADDED MATTER A US Perspective. by Enrica Bruno Patent Attorney. Steinfl & Bruno LLP Intellectual Property Law

HANDLING OF PATENT APPLICATIONS UNDER THE EPC

Practical Advice For International Patenting

ti Litigating Patents Overseas: Country Specific Considerations Germany There is no "European" litigation system.

European Patent Opposition Proceedings

ARE EXPRESSED SEQUENCE TAGS PATENTABLE UNDER THE EUROPEAN PATENT CONVENTION? A PRACTITIONER'S VIEW

FUNCTIONAL CLAIMING UNDER THE EPC General principles and case-law

The Same Invention or Not the Same Invention? Thorsten Bausch

Maximizing Patent Prosecution Opportunities in Europe: Tactics for Counsel When Drafting U.S.-Origin Applications

Table 1: General overview of the PCT procedure Legend:

WSPLA (Wash. State Patent Law Assoc.) Lunch Seminar

Examination of CII and Business Methods Applications

Managing costs and timeliness at EPO & UKIPO. Mike Jennings A.A.Thornton & Co October 2017

Working Guidelines Q217. The patentability criteria for inventive step / non-obviousness

BESCHWERDEKAMMERN DES EUROPÄISCHEN PATENTAMTS BOARDS OF APPEAL OF THE EUROPEAN PATENT OFFICE CHAMBRES DE RECOURS DE L'OFFICE EUROPEEN DES BREVETS

Section I New Matter. (June 2010) 1. Relevant Provision

Major Differences Between Prosecution at EPO and JPO

Transcription:

Examination Matters 2017 Webinars Amendments and unsearched subject-matter Ekkehard Weinberg Yann Robin Examiner, EPO European Patent Attorney, epi 5 December 2017 EPO Munich

Amendments and unsearched subject-matter The presenters Ekkehard Weinberg Examiner, Handling & Processing, EPO Munich Yann Robin UK/FR, UK and European Patent Attorney, Marks & Clerk, Glasgow European Patent Office 2

Amendments and unsearched subject-matter Agenda Objectives Scenario "rubber saucer" Toolbox on Rule 137(5) EPC Scenario "anti-skid saucer" Prevention and remedies Conclusions Questions European Patent Office 3

Amendments and unsearched subject-matter Objectives Exploring the legal framework surrounding Rule 137(5) EPC Rule 137(5) EPC Gaining awareness of practical implications Identify strategies to handle and prevent objections European Patent Office 4

Amendments and unsearched subject-matter Agenda ü Objectives Scenario "rubber saucer" Toolbox on Rule 137(5) EPC Scenario "anti-skid saucer" Prevention and remedies Conclusions Questions European Patent Office 5

Scenario "rubber saucer" solution: Scenario } Problem: Provide saucer that can be used with cups of different sizes European Patent Office 6

Scenario "rubber saucer" Claim 1 Claim 2 Scenario Saucer having a plurality of concentric recesses... with the recesses in a stepped configuration } Problem: Provide saucer that can be used with cups of different sizes Description Made of rubber no slipping of cups... European Patent Office 7

Scenario "rubber saucer" Claim 1 Claim 2 Scenario A A + B } Do you think that this objection is justified? þ yes ý no Description C to improve A EPO (search) A not new Amended claim 1 Amended claim 2 EPO (exam.) A + C A + C + B Not admitted (R137(5)). European Patent Office 8

Amendments and unsearched subject-matter Agenda ü Objectives ü Scenario "rubber saucer" Toolbox on Rule 137(5) EPC Scenario "anti-skid saucer" Prevention and remedies Conclusions Questions European Patent Office 9

Toolbox analysis Amendment of the European patent application Amended claims may not relate to unsearched subject-matter Rule 137(5) EPC which does not combine with the originally claimed invention or group of inventions to form a single general inventive concept. Nor may they relate to subject-matter not searched in accordance with Rule 62a or Rule 63. European Patent Office 10

Toolbox "unsearched subject-matter" Drawing up of the European search report "(...) a European search report (...) on the basis of the claims, with due regard to the description and any drawings." Article 92 EPC European Patent Office 11

Toolbox "unsearched subject-matter" Searched subject-matter includes...... subject-matter of the claims... essential features Article 92 EPC GL B-III, 3.5 GL H-II, 6.2 (GL = Guidelines)... feature making contribution to the effect of the features of originally claimed invention European Patent Office 12

Toolbox "unsearched subject-matter" Unsearched subject-matter results from...... technical features from description with effects unrelated to the effects of the features of originally claimed inventions GL H-II, 6.2 European Patent Office 13

Toolbox "single general inventive concept" Assessment Compare subject-matter of original claims and amended claims, GL H-II, 6.2 and check if there is lack of unity between the amended claim and the original claims. European Patent Office 14

Toolbox "single general inventive concept" Further indicators: does added feature...... change the nature of the invention? T 2334/11 T 0345/13; T 274/03... fall under original general inventive concept? European Patent Office 15

Toolbox special cases Rule 62a and/or Rule 63 EPC cases Amended claims may not relate to subject-matter not searched under Rule 62a or Rule 63. The presence of this subject-matter in the description cannot be used for its reintroduction into claims. Rule 137(5) EPC GL, H-II, 6.1 European Patent Office 16

Toolbox summary Rule 137(5) EPC Amended claims may not relate to unsearched subject-matter which does not combine with the originally claimed invention or group of inventions to form a single general inventive concept. Nor may they relate to subject-matter not searched in accordance with Rule 62a or Rule 63. European Patent Office 17

Content Agenda ü Introduction Scenario "rubber saucer" ü Toolbox on Rule 137(5) EPC Scenario "anti-skid saucer" Prevention and remedies Conclusions Questions European Patent Office 18

Scenario "rubber saucer" Scenario Claim 1 A Claim 2 A + B Description C to improve A EPO (search) A not new Amended claim 1 A + C } Is objection justified? þ yes ý no } Not justified. The feature "C" is deemed to be part of the searched subject-matter since this feature is disclosed as a particular advantageous improvement of the technical effect of the feature "A" present in claim 1. Amended claim 2 EPO (exam.) A + C + B Not admitted (R137(5)). European Patent Office 19

Amendments and unsearched subject-matter Agenda ü Introduction ü Scenario "rubber saucer" ü Toolbox on Rule 137(5) EPC Scenario "anti-skid saucer" Prevention and remedies Conclusions Questions European Patent Office 20

Scenario "anti-skid saucer" Solution: Scenario } Problem: Provide saucer that can be used with cups of different sizes European Patent Office 21

Scenario "anti-skid saucer" Claim 1 Scenario Saucer having a plurality of concentric recesses } Problem: Provide saucer that can be used with cups of different sizes Description Rubber coating on lower surface no slipping on table European Patent Office 22

Scenario "anti-skid saucer" Scenario Claim 1 A + B Description A + C (with C different effect from A or B) EPO (search) A + B not inventive } Is objection justified? þ yes ý no } Justified. The feature "C" is unrelated to the effects of the features of the originally claimed invention. Amended claim 1 EPO (exam.) A + C Not admitted (R137(5)). European Patent Office 23

Amendments and unsearched subject-matter Agenda ü Introduction ü Scenario "rubber saucer" ü Toolbox on Rule 137(5) EPC ü Scenario "anti-skid saucer" Prevention and remedies Conclusions Questions European Patent Office 24

Amendments and unsearched subject-matter Prevention and remedies When drafting the application important features to be in the claims, preferably in "first branch". indicate how feature contributes to technical effect of invention. When filing amendment argue why the amended feature further defines a feature already present in the original claims and contributes to their effect. European Patent Office 25

Amendments and unsearched subject-matter Agenda ü Introduction ü Scenario "rubber saucer" ü Toolbox on Rule 137(5) EPC ü Scenario "anti-skid saucer" ü Prevention and remedies Conclusions Questions European Patent Office 26

Amendments and unsearched subject-matter Conclusions A valid objection under Rule 137(5) EPC, first sentence, requires both conditions to be met: "unsearched" AND "not single inventive concept" Rule 137(5) EPC Unsearched feature (in claim/description) does not necessarily mean unsearched subject-matter in the sense of Rule 137(5) EPC European Patent Office 27

Amendments and unsearched subject-matter Conclusions To avoid objection: explain in the description the technical relationship of sub-features with regard to the inventive concept order claims to present most important embodiments first. European Patent Office 28

Amendments and unsearched subject-matter Agenda ü Introduction ü Scenario "rubber saucer" ü Toolbox on Rule 137(5) EPC ü Scenario "anti-skid saucer" ü Prevention and remedies ü Conclusions Questions European Patent Office 29

Questions Questions now via chat to All participants later via mail è academy@epo.org European Patent Office 30