Legal & Policy Criteria Governing Establishment of Electoral Districts

Similar documents
Legal & Policy Criteria Governing Establishment of Electoral Districts

Implementing Trustee Area Elections: Procedural & Substantive Considerations

Legal & Policy Criteria Governing Establishment of Districts

Item 10A 1 of 37

Sweetwater Union High School District Demographic and Districting Introduction

Cooper v. Harris, 581 U.S. (2017).

LEGAL ISSUES FOR REDISTRICTING IN INDIANA

GUIDE TO DISTRICTING LAW PREPARED FOR THE CHULA VISTA DISTRICTING COMMISSION

CITY OF DANA POINT AGENDA REPORT

Redistricting & the Quantitative Anatomy of a Section 2 Voting Rights Case

Case 5:12-cv KHV-JWL- Document 229 Filed 05/29/12 Page 1 of 10 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS

Overview. League of Women Voters: The Ins and Outs of Redistricting 4/21/2015

Redistricting 101 Why Redistrict?

COMPACTNESS IN THE REDISTRICTING PROCESS

REDISTRICTING IN LOUISIANA PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION. Educational Presentation December 15, 2010

Partisan Gerrymandering

The Journey From Census To The United States Supreme Court Linda J. Shorey

Redistricting Virginia

Partisan Gerrymandering

Redistricting in Louisiana Past & Present. Regional Educational Presentation Baton Rouge December 15, 2009

Paul Smith, Attorney at Law Jenner and Block Washington, DC. Gerry Hebert, Attorney at Law Washington, DC

CITIZEN ADVOCACY CENTER

Case 2:12-cv RJS-DBP Document 441 Filed 12/21/17 Page 1 of 39 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF UTAH, CENTRAL DIVISION

DRAWING LINES: RACIAL GERRYMANDERING IN BETHUNE- HILL V. VIRGINIA BOARD OF ELECTIONS

Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council. Analysis of United Student District Amendment Redistricting Plan

ORDINANCE NO C.S.

IUSD ELECTORAL PROCESS UNDER CONSIDERATION. March 27, 2018

REDISTRICTING IN LOUISIANA

New Developments in the Meaning of the Voting Rights Act. Nate Persily Beekman Professor of Law and Political Science Columbia Law School

APPORTIONMENT Statement of Position As announced by the State Board, 1966

Special Master s Recommended Plan for the North Carolina Senate and House of Representatives

Redistricting in Louisiana Past & Present. Regional Educational Presentation Monroe February 2, 2010

NEW YORK STATE SENATE PUBLIC MEETING ON REDISTRICTING DECEMBER 14, 2010

CITY OF DANA POINT AGENDA REPORT

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA DURHAM DIVISION

In The Supreme Court of the United States

MATH 1340 Mathematics & Politics

Testimony of FairVote The Center for Voting and Democracy Jack Santucci, Program for Representative Government. October 16, 2006

CITIZENS REDISTRICTING COMMISSION PROPOSAL EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

IUSD ELECTORAL PROCESS UNDER CONSIDERATION. May 8, 2018

Case 3:14-cv REP-GBL-BMK Document 73 Filed 06/19/15 Page 1 of 33 PageID# 844

3:11-cv PMD-HFF-MBS Date Filed 03/09/12 Entry Number 214 Page 1 of 24

Arizona Independent Redistricting Commission Legal Overview. July 8, 2011 By: Joseph Kanefield and Mary O Grady

AP UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT AND POLITICS 2008 SCORING GUIDELINES

Elections by Trustee Area Informational Session on Transition to Trustee Areas. June 25-26, 2018

Sacramento Citizens Advisory Redistricting Committee Session 1 - April 25, 2011

In the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas

Charter Review Commission

In the Supreme Court of the United States

ST. TAMMANY PARISH SCHOOL BOARD 2010 CENSUS/2014 ELECTION REDISTRICTING DECEMBER 1, Presentation by REDISTRICTING L.L.C.

Reading Between the Lines Congressional and State Legislative Redistricting

Citizens Union and the League of Women Voters of New York State

Reapportionment. In 1991, reapportionment and redistricting were the most open, democratic, and racially

Sully District Fairfax County. Prepared by Ralph Hubbard Sully Supervisor Representative Fairfax County Redistricting Committee 3/23/2011

Joint Statement of Senator Bob Rucho and Representative David Lewis regarding the release of Rucho-Lewis Congress 2

Congressional Redistricting and the Voting Rights Act: A Legal Overview

2009 Election Uniformity Workshop

SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

Realistic Guidelines: Making it Work

Congressional Redistricting and the Voting Rights Act: A Legal Overview

GIS in Redistricting Jack Dohrman, GIS Analyst Nebraska Legislature Legislative Research Office

REFERENCE ACTION ANALYST STAFF DIRECTOR SUMMARY ANALYSIS

In the Supreme Court of the United States

Congressional Redistricting and the Voting Rights Act: A Legal Overview

RACIAL GERRYMANDERING

Submitted by: ASSEMBLY MEMBERS HALL, TRAIN!

No. IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES. MARGARET DICKSON, et al., ROBERT RUCHO, et al.,

Objectives. 1. Warm-Up. 2. National/State Legislatures Worksheet. 3. Congressional Membership Notes. 4. Video Clip US Congress. 5.

Redrawing the Map: Redistricting Issues in Michigan. Jordon Newton Research Associate Citizens Research Council of Michigan

ALBC PLAINTIFFS EXPLANATORY BRIEF IN RESPONSE TO AUGUST 28, 2015, ORDER

Purpose of Congress. Make laws governing the nation

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. Plaintiff,

STATE OF CALIFORNIA CITIZENS REDISTRICTING COMMISSION FINAL REPORT ON 2011 REDISTRICTING

Supreme Court of the United States

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA NO. 1:13-CV-00949

GOLDEN BETHUNE-HILL, ET AL., Appellants, v. VIRGINIA STATE BOARD OF ELECTIONS, ET AL., Appellees.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA SPECIAL MASTER S RECOMMENDED PLAN AND REPORT

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA SPECIAL MASTER S DRAFT PLAN AND ORDER

Chapter 3 Southern Redistricting under the VRA: A Model of Partisan Tides*

Gerrymandering: t he serpentine art VCW State & Local

TX RACIAL GERRYMANDERING

The California Voting Rights Act What To Do When Your Agency Gets a Letter

MARGARET DICKSON, et al., ROBERT RUCHO, et al., RESPONDENTS BRIEF IN OPPOSITION TO PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI. No

The California Voting Rights Act

Gerry Hebert, Executive Director Campaign Legal Center Washington, DC. The 31st COGEL Annual Conference December 6-9, 2009 Scottsdale, AZ

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA NO. 1:16-CV-1026 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) INTRODUCTION

New York Redistricting Memo Analysis

Case 3:14-cv REP-GBL-BMK Document 104 Filed 07/20/15 Page 1 of 44 PageID# 2784

AN AMENDMENT TO ESTABLISH THE ARKANSAS CITIZENS' REDISTRICTING COMMISSION

Texas Redistricting: Rules of Engagement in a Nutshell

CALENDAR OF EVENTS MARCH 7, 2017 CONSOLIDATED MUNICIPAL AND SPECIAL ELECTIONS

ESSB H COMM AMD By Committee on State Government, Elections & Information Technology

State Legislative Redistricting in : Emerging Trends and Issues in Reapportionment By Ronald E. Weber

In The Supreme Court of the United States

Theodore M. Shaw, Julius L. Chambers Distinguished Professor of Law, University of North Carolina Law School at Chapel Hill

GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF NORTH CAROLINA THIRD EXTRA SESSION 2016 HOUSE BILL DRH30015-LU-3 (12/13)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA NO. 1:13-CV PLAINTIFFS TRIAL BRIEF

Local Opportunities for Redistricting Reform

GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF NORTH CAROLINA SESSION 2017 HOUSE BILL DRH10050-BK-2 (02/13) Short Title: Nonpartisan Redistricting Commission.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA NO. 1:13-CV-00949

Transcription:

Legal & Policy Criteria Governing Establishment of Electoral Districts City of Hemet February 9, 2016 City of Hemet Establishment of Electoral Districts 1

Process: Basic Overview With Goal of Nov. 2016 Elections Activity Work Shop re Creation of Electoral Districts, Criteria for Districting and Tentative Calendar; Related Steps and Instructions Timing February 9, 2016 Initial Draft Plans Made Public March 1, 2016 At Least Three Public Hearings (Elec. Code 10010) March - April 2016 (dates to be determined) First Reading of Ordinance Adopting Electoral Districts Late April or early May 2016 (dates to be determined) Second Reading of Ordinance Adopting Electoral Districts April 2016 Effective Date of Ordinance Adopting Electoral Districts 30 days after final passage Opening of Candidate Filing Period for City Council July 18, 2016 Implement Adopted Electoral Districts November 2016 City of Hemet Establishment of Electoral Districts 2

Process: Effect of Districting on Incumbents No council member s term must be cut short (see Gov. Code 34878 ; Elec. Code 21606(a)), but When his or her term ends, an incumbent can only run from the new district in which he or she resides. City of Hemet Establishment of Electoral Districts 3

Drawing the Lines: Legal Considerations Overriding criterion is population equality (see Elec. Code 21601; Reynolds v. Sims, 377 U.S. 533 (1964)). Unlike congressional districts, local electoral districts do not require perfect equality some deviation acceptable to serve valid governmental interests. Total deviation less than 10% presumptively constitutional. (Caution: the presumption can be overcome!) Total City Population (2010 Census): 78,657 persons Ideal District Population, 5 Districts: 15,731 persons Redistricting in 2021. City of Hemet Establishment of Electoral Districts 4

Legal Considerations: Voting Rights Act Section 2 of the federal Voting Rights Act prohibits electoral systems (including district plans), which dilute minority voting rights by denying minorities an equal opportunity to nominate and elect candidates of their choice. In the districting context, only requires creation of majorityminority districts. Bartlett v. Strickland, 559 U.S. 1 (2009). California Voting Rights Act is silent with respect to the shape of electoral districts, so long as they are used. City of Hemet Establishment of Electoral Districts 5

Voting Rights Act: Cracking District 1 Minority Voters Minority Voters District 4 District 2 District 3 City of Hemet Establishment of Electoral Districts 6

Voting Rights Act: Packing District 1 District 4 Minority Voters Minority Voters District 2 District 3 City of Hemet Establishment of Electoral Districts 7

Legal Considerations: No Racial Gerrymandering The Fourteenth Amendment prohibits using race as the predominant criterion in drawing districts and the subordination of other considerations. Shaw v. Reno, 509 U.S. 630 (1993); Miller v. Johnson, 515 U.S. 900 (1995). Looks matter! Bizarrely shaped Electoral Districts can be evidence that racial considerations predominate. (See next slide, NC CD 12 stretched 160 miles across the central part of the State, for part of its length no wider than the freeway right-of-way.) But bizarre shape is not required for racial considerations to predominate. Fourteenth Amendment does not, however, prohibit all consideration of race in redistricting. Easley v. Cromartie, 532 U.S. 234 (2001). Focus on communities of interest. City of Hemet Establishment of Electoral Districts 8

Legal Considerations: No Racial Gerrymandering: NC CD 12 (1992) City of Hemet Establishment of Electoral Districts 9

Topography. Geography. Legal Considerations: Other Permissible Criteria Cohesiveness, contiguity, compactness and integrity of territory. Communities of interest. (See Elec. Code 21601) City of Hemet Establishment of Electoral Districts 10

Legal Considerations: Other Criteria Approved by Courts Some other legitimate criteria include: Preventing head-to-head contests between incumbents, to the extent reasonably possible. Respecting the boundaries of political subdivisions (e.g., school attendance areas, special district boundaries, county boundaries, etc.). Use of whole census geography (e.g., census blocks). Other non-discriminatory, evenly applied criteria (e.g. location of public facilities, planned development, allocation of commercial areas) City of Hemet Establishment of Electoral Districts 11

Legal & Policy Criteria Governing Establishment of Electoral Districts City of Hemet February 9, 2016 City of Hemet Establishment of Electoral Districts 12