Rule #154/2015 Current as of January, 2015

Similar documents
Subject: Establishes the administrative proceedings of the Pilot Program for Patent Prosecution Highway PPH Shared Priority Examination.

Procedures to file a request to the JPO (Japan Patent Office) for Patent Prosecution Highway Pilot Program

Part I PPH using the national work products from the JPO

Strategic patent prosecution in Brazil Judicial review of the Brazilian PTO decisions

Procedures and Requirements for Filing a Request for Patent Prosecution. Highway Pilot Program (PPH) to the National Institute of Industrial Property

3/17 # 04. Brazil Japan PPH is Officially Established

Procedures to file a request to the SPTO (Spanish Patent and Trademark Office) for Patent Prosecution Highway Pilot Program

Framework Provisions for the Global Patent Prosecution Highway System

USPTO Programs for Expediting Patent Prosecution: Accelerated Exam, Patent Prosecution Highway, Green Technology. Susan Perng Pan November 2010

Part I - PPH using the national work products from the SIPO

The application which is filed with the KIPO and on which the applicant files a request for the PCT-PPH must satisfy the following requirements:

DKPTO PPH Guidelines for Chinese applicants

Procedures to file a request to the Federal Service for Intellectual Property (Rospatent) for Patent Prosecution Highway Pilot Program

Re: JIPA Comments on the Proposed Enhanced Examination Timing Control Initiative in the United States

IPO CZ PPH Guidelines for Finnish filers/applicants. Procedures to file a request to the. for the Patent Prosecution Highway

EXPLANATORY NOTES ON THE PATENT LAW TREATY AND REGULATIONS UNDER THE PATENT LAW TREATY * prepared by the International Bureau

PATENT PROSECUTION HIGHWAY

I. Purpose of this document. III. Procedures to File a Request for Preferential Examination under the PPH Pilot Program

Patent Law Treaty * (adopted at Geneva on June 1, 2000) TABLE OF CONTENTS

Explanatory material of Global PPH Matrix

Procedures to file a request to the EPA (The Estonian Patent Office) for Patent Prosecution Highway Pilot Program. Part I

TREATY SERIES 2013 Nº 8. WIPO Patent Law Treaty

WORLD INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY ORGANIZATION GENEVA DIPLOMATIC CONFERENCE FOR THE ADOPTION OF THE PATENT LAW TREATY. Geneva, May 11 to June 2, 2000

Patent Prosecution Highway Pilot Programme between the Intellectual Property Office of Singapore and the Korean Intellectual Property Office

Chapter 1 Overview of Foreign Language Written Application System

FRAMEWORK PROVISIONS FOR THE DIGITAL ACCESS SERVICE FOR PRIORITY DOCUMENTS 1. established on March 31, 2009 and modified on July 1, 2012

Prosecuting an Israel Patent Application and Beyond

GLOSSARY of patent related terms in the IP5 STATISTICS REPORT 2015 EDITION

INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY OFFICE (PHILIPPINES)

Intellectual Property Office is an operating name of the Patent Office

Order on Patents and Supplementary Protection Certificates

Aug.2014 JAPAN PATENT OFFICE

DENMARK Patents Regulations Order No. 25 of 18 January, 2013 ENTRY INTO FORCE: 1 February, 2013

The request form is available online on the NBPR website at

IPO PCT-PPH Guidelines for Chinese applicants

AGREEMENT. between the Spanish Patent and Trademark Office and the International Bureau of the World Intellectual Property Organization

BYLAWS PRIVATE PRACTICE SECTION AMERICAN PHYSICAL THERAPY ASSOCIATION ARTICLE I. NAME AND RELATIONSHIP TO AMERICAN PHYSICAL THERAPY ASSOCIATION

I. Introduction In recent years, there has been an increasing need for obtaining patent rights in foreign countries where manufacturing hubs and

Strategies for Expediting U.S. Patent Prosecution. Rachel K. Pilloff

AGREEMENT. (as in force from January 1, 2018)*

COMMON REGULATIONS UNDER THE MADRID AGREEMENT CONCERNING THE INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION OF MARKS AND THE PROTOCOL RELATING TO THAT AGREEMENT

Common Regulations under the Madrid Agreement Concerning the International Registration of Marks and the Protocol Relating to that Agreement

TREATY SERIES 2000 Nº 2. Trademark Law Treaty With Regulations and Model Forms

PATENT LAW OF GEORGIA CHAPTER I. GENERAL PROVISIONS

GLOSSARY of patent related terms in the IP5 STATISTICS REPORT 2016 EDITION

United States Patent and Trademark Office and Japan Patent Office Collaborative Search. AGENCY: United States Patent and Trademark Office, Commerce.

PATENT PROSECUTION STRATEGIES IN AN AIA WORLD: SUCCEEDING WITH THE CHANGES

Practice for Patent Application

COMMON REGULATIONS UNDER THE MADRID AGREEMENT CONCERNING THE INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION OF MARKS AND THE PROTOCOL RELATING TO THAT AGREEMENT

DRAFT PATENT LAW OF GEORGIA CHAPTER I. GENERAL PROVISIONS

EGYPTIAN PATENT OFFICE

Standing Committee on the Law of Trademarks, Industrial Designs and Geographical Indications

Accelerating the Acquisition of an Enforceable Patent: Bypassing the USPTO s Backlog Lawrence A. Stahl and Seth E. Boeshore

AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF NURSE ANESTHETISTS FOUNDATION BYLAWS ARTICLE I NAME

APPLICABILITY OF CERTAIN AMENDMENTS AND MODIFICATIONS OF THE PATENT COOPERATION TREATY (PCT) TO THE PATENT LAW TREATY (PLT)

GLOSSARY of patent related terms in the FOUR OFFICE STATISTICS REPORT 2010 EDITION

Requirements and Procedures to File a Request to CIPO for the Patent Prosecution Highway (PPH)

Annex 2 DEFINITIONS FOR TERMS AND FOR STATISTICS ON PROCEDURES

TRADEMARK LAW TREATY adopted at Geneva on October 27, 1994 Entry into force: see Article 20(2).

LAW ON CHAMBERS OF COMMERCE

Patent Prosecution Highway JAPAN PATENT OFFICE

Compilation date: 24 February Includes amendments up to: Act No. 61, Registered: 27 February 2017

PATENT ACTIVITY AT THE IP5 OFFICES

Decision on Integrated Circuit Layout-Designs

Working Group on the Development of the Lisbon System (Appellations of Origin)

Foreign Exchange Order Cabinet Order No. 260 of October 11, 1980

Pursuant to the November 29, 2005 Law on Intellectual Property;

Patent Cooperation Treaty

Decision 27/CMP.1 Procedures and mechanisms relating to compliance under the Kyoto Protocol

Agreement on the Creation of the African Regional Industrial Property Organization (ARIPO)*

CONSTITUTION AND BY-LAWS PAUL SMITH'S COLLEGE ALUMNI ASSOCIATION, INC.

Strasbourg Agreement Concerning the International Patent Classification

EXHIBIT A: DEFAULT BYLAWS

Official Journal of the European Union L 251/3

Procedures to file a request to the DPMA for Patent Prosecution Highway ( PPH ) Pilot Program between the DPMA and the NBPR

Introduction to Patent Prosecution Highway JAPAN PATENT OFFICE

Budapest Treaty on the International Recognition of the Deposit of Microorganisms for the Purposes of Patent Procedure

b) to promote the exchange of ideas sustainable management practices, knowledge, technology, and

PATENT ACTIVITY AT THE IP5 OFFICES

DETAILED TABLE OF CONTENTS

AGREEMENT. between the National Institute of Industrial Property of Chile and the International Bureau of the World Intellectual Property Organization

Constitution of the Rotary Club of Tullahoma

AFRICAN REGIONAL INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY ORGANIZATION (ARIPO) REGULATIONS FOR IMPLEMENTING THE HARARE PROTOCOL

ARTICLES OF ASSOCIATION EUROPEAN CHEMICAL TRANSPORT ASSOCIATION in short (ECTA)

BATON ROUGE SECTION OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY. BYLAW I Name

Bills to amend the Brazilian Patent Statute, Federal Law 9,279 of May 14th, 1996

Patent Cooperation Treaty

Trademark Law Treaty

Implementing Regulations to the Convention on the Grant of European Patents

Patent Prosecution Procedures under the Japanese Patent Law. Sera, Toyama, Matsukura & Kawaguchi

ISACA New York Metropolitan Chapter Bylaws DRAFT (Effective: July 1, 2018)

Madrid Agreement and Protocol Concerning the International Registration of Marks

HUNGARY Patent Act Act XXXIII of 1995 as consolidated on March 01, 2015

Treaties. of May 20, 2015

AGREEMENT. (as in force from September 1, 2018)*

DRAFT PATENT LAW TREATY AND DRAFT REGULATIONS *

Patent protection in Latin America: Main provisions and recommended strategy

Convention providing a Uniform Law on the Form of an International Will (Washington, D.C.1973)

TREATY SERIES 2011 Nº 5

* BYLAWS OF THE NORTHEAST TENNESSEE SECTION OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY. BYLAW I Name

Transcription:

Rule #154/2015 This rule concerns the administrative proceedings of the Pilot Project of Shared Prioritized Examination Patent Prosecution Highway PPH. Current as of January, 2015

By exercising the powers vested in them by the BRPTO Bylaws, and considering the provisions of Statute #9 279, of May 14, 1996 (Brazilian IP Statute), as well as articles 159, Section IV and article 106 of the BRPTO Bylaws, which is attached to Order #149 of the Ministry of Development, Industry and Foreign Commerce of May 13, 2013, and CONSIDERING the Joint Statement between the United States Government and the Government of Brazil on Patent Examination Sharing between Offices signed in Washington, D.C., on June 30, 2015; CONSIDERING the Memorandum of Understanding between the BRPTO and the United States Patent and Trademark Office USPTO, of November 19, 2015, and the relevant Work Plan established between the Offices; and CONSIDERING the principles of territoriality and independence of intellectual property rights, THE PRESIDENT OF THE BRAZILIAN PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE (BRPTO) and the PATENT DIRECTOR DETERMINE: Article 1. This Rule concerns the administrative proceeding of the Pilot Project of Shared Examination Patent Prosecution Highway PPH established between the BRPTO and the USPTO, hereinafter BRPTO- USPTO PPH Pilot Project, under the BRPTO. Article 2. For the purposes of this Rule, definitions are as follows: I - First Patent Application: a patent application filed in the BRPTO or the USPTO without priority claim that can be used as priority document for a second patent application filing in another national Patent Office or international organization and that can create a patent family; or international filing, under the PCT, without priority claim, where the BRPTO or the USPTO is appointed as receiving office, in which case the patent application can enter national phase and create a patent family; II - Second Patent Application: A patent application filed in the BRPTO or the USPTO and that is part of the patent family of the first patent application; or a patent application that entered national phase in the BRPTO or USPTO composing the patent family of the first patent application; III - Patent Family: a collection of patent applications filed in more than one national Patent Office or international organization, where all of them claim at least the oldest priority; IV - Office of First Filling OFF: The Patent Office where the first patent application is filed; V - Office of Second Filling OSF: The Patent Office where the second patent application is filed; VI - Office of Earlier Examination OEE: The national Patent Office (the BRPTO or the USPTO) that first issues a decision of patent grant of an application belonging to the patent family, be it the OFF or OSF; VII - Office of Later Examination OLE: The national Patent Office (the BRPTO or the USPTO) where PPH is requested and that prioritizes prosecution and examines a patent application belonging to the same patent family based on OEE results; VIII - Able Patent Application: A patent application complying with eligibility conditions set out in Article 7 of this Rule; and IX - Date of request: date of receipt of PPH request of shared prioritized examination at the BRPTO headquarters, or relevant regional divisional offices and/or representation offices in each State, or via electronic form, or date of posting should the request be sent via mail. X - Sufficiently corresponding application: an application where the matter described in the application filed in the OLE does not amend or change the subject matter deemed patentable in the corresponding OEE application, even when translation inconsistencies are considered, and when both of them belong to the same patent family; XI - Sufficiently corresponding claim: a claim where a claimed matter in the OLE is of the same or narrower scope of the subject matter deemed patentable in the corresponding OEE application, even when translation differences are considered; and XII Narrower claim scope: a claim scope is narrower when it is limited, under Article 32 of the Brazilian IP Statute and the BRPTO Rule # 93, of June 10, 2013. 2

Article 3. For the purposes of this Rule, the following steps should be followed for PPH to apply: I - Applicant files first patent application, which turns the receiving national Office or international organization into the OFF; II - Applicant files second patent application by claiming priority of the first patent application as priority or entering national phase, which turns the receiving national Office into the OSF; III - National Office that issues the first patent grant, either from first or second patent application, becomes the OEE; IV - Applicant requests participation in BRPTO-USPTO PPH Pilot Project by meeting requirements and submitting results of the first patent grant to the other national Office, which becomes OLE; and V - When the application is considered able, OLE prioritizes the patent application belonging to the same family in every following step, until the final decision. Sole paragraph. Any waiver of the First Patent Application that was used as priority for international filing under the PCT does not exempt the participation of the corresponding entries into national phase in the BRPTO-USPTO PPH Pilot Project. Article 4. The applicant of a patent application accepted in the USPTO may request a prioritized examination of an application of the same family in the BRPTO, should the application meet the requirements of this Rule. Article 5. The BRPTO-USPTO PPH Pilot Project should accept participation requests for a period of two years, or the Pilot Project should extend until every application considered able has a final decision. Article 6. The BRPTO will examine no more than 150 applications as OLE. 1. The examination mentioned in the main section of this article is completed chronologically as per date of request to participate the BRPTO-USPTO PPH Pilot Project. 2. The applications able to participate in the BRPTO- USPTO PPH Pilot Project that exceed the limit set out in the main section of this article will not be included in the Project. Article 7. For the purposes of the BRPTO-USPTO PPH Pilot Project, the following requirements for prioritized examination are made: I - Patent application filed in the BRPTO from January 1, 2013 onwards; II - Utility patent application; III - Patent application published at the BRPTO Official Gazette RPI (in the Portuguese abbreviation) under the provisions of article 30 of the Brazilian IP Statute, or patent application published in advance upon applicant s request under paragraph 1 of article 30 of the Brazilian IP Statute, or patent application that has been accepted in the admissibility examination to enter national phase filed via PCT; IV - Patent application for which a request for examination has been requested, under the provisions of article 33 of the Brazilian IP Statute; V - Patent application where examination is not pending answer to office action previously made by the BRPTO; VI - Patent application that has not defaulted payment of annuity under article 84 of the Brazilian IP Statute; VII - Patent application where request for prioritized examination was not granted and published in the BRPTO Official Gazette; VIII - Patent application that is not being judicially challenged in Brazil; IX - Non-divisional patent applications, except those arising from direct division of the original application, as a result of a lack of unity of invention objection from the OEE, in the sufficiently corresponding application; X - Patent application that has not undergone regular technical examination duly published in the BRPTO Official Gazette; XI - Patent application where claimed subject matter explicitly belongs to the oil, gas, or petrochemical industry, and classified as any of the symbols in the International Patent Classification IPC, including IPC s relevant hierarchal lower levels of classification, found in Annex I of this Rule; XII - Patent application belonging to a patent family, under Article 2 of this Rule; XIII - Patent application where family member received a notice of allowance from the USPTO; XIV - Patent application where family has at least the first patent application filed in the BRPTO or USPTO; 3

1. Utility model and design applications are excluded from the BRPTO-USPTO PPH Pilot Project. 2. Plant patent applications, reexamination applications, reissue applications and industrial design applications should not be used as basis to request participation in the BRPTO-USPTO PPH Pilot Project. Article 8. Admission request in the BRPTO-USPTO PPH Pilot Project provided for in this Rule should be made via Service Code #277 of the Table of Fees of Patent Services Provided by the BRPTO. However, applicant is not exempt from remaining fees pertaining to patent application prosecution. Article 9. When the BRPTO acts as OEE of a patent application with family member in the USPTO, applicant may request participation in the BRPTO-USPTO PPH Pilot Project in the USPTO, by complying with the provisions set out by the USPTO. Article 10. For admission in the BRPTO-USPTO PPH Pilot Project, only the applicant may request for participation by using the Patent Prosecution Highway Project Participation Request Form. Sole paragraph. When a patent application has more than one applicant, all applicants should acknowledge the participation request. Article 11. When an individual other than applicant practices the acts provided for in this Rule, a power of attorney should be submitted in addition, under paragraph 1 of Article 216 of the Brazilian IP Statute. Article 12. Applicant should submit the following documents and information in Portuguese to the BRPTO upon requesting admission in the BRPTO-USPTO PPH Pilot Project of a patent application: I - Prioritized Examination Request Form; II - New pages of patent application adapted to sufficiently match the allowed subject matter that the OEE previously set out as accepted; pages should comply with applicable rules on patent application submission to the BRPTO; III - A Claim Correspondence Table of the claim charts comparing new claims submitted to the BRPTO and the claims considered to be allowable/patentable by the USPTO as OEE, under model in Annex II of this Rule; IV - Proof that the application falls within technology industry which is able to participate in the Pilot Project, pursuant to line XI, Article 7 of this Rule; V - When the object of a patent application is a result of access to component of Brazilian genetic heritage or associated traditional knowledge, the information required under applicable laws should be provided, accompanied by request for the BRPTO-USPTO PPH Pilot Program, VI - When the OEE technical examination report mentions non-patent prior art references, those documents should be submitted along with request for the BRPTO-USPTO PPH Pilot Program: Sole paragraph. When claims submitted to the BRPTO are a mere translation of claims accepted by the USPTO as OEE, the Claim Correspondence Table described in Section III of this article can be replaced with a corresponding declaration. Article 13. Applicant should submit the following statements, in Portuguese, to the BRPTO when applicant requests participation in the BRPTO-USPTO PPH Pilot Project or enters these in the Prioritized Examination Request Form: I - That all copies of OEE actions, when submitted to the BRPTO, correspond to the original documents and replicate their form and content; II - That translations, when submitted to the BRPTO, match the contents of the original documents; III - That the patent application is not being judicially challenged in Brazil; and IV - That the patent application does not arise from voluntary division of patent application. Article 14. The Patent Board (DIRPA, in the Portuguese abbreviation) is responsible for checking requirements of prioritized examinations and eligibility of patent applications that may participate in the BRPTO-USPTO PPH Pilot Project through the Shared Prioritized Examination Project Work Group. Article 15. When the submitted patent application is 4

considered able to participate in the BRPTO-USPTO PPH Project, the BRPTO should provide a specific notification of the acceptance of the prioritized examination of patent application in the Brazilian Official Gazette publication. Article 16. When the patent application is not considered able to participate in the Pilot Project or exceeds the limit of openings, the BRPTO should notify the rejection of prioritized examination of patent application in the Brazilian Official Gazette. 1. When a prioritized examination is rejected, the patent application resumes ordinary prosecution. 2. When the BRPTO points out remediable irregularities, applicant may submit a single additional priority examination request within 60 days, pursuant to Article 224 of the Brazilian IP Statute by correcting any the irregularities; applicant is exempted from resubmitting any documents for which no irregularities were pointed out. Article 17. Pursuant to article 212 of the Brazilian IP Statute, the decisions provided for in this Rule cannot be appealed. application, the BRPTO may request that the applicant submits copies of the following documents in respect of the technical examination throughout the technical examination period: I - Copy of search reports, office actions made by OEE and applicant s answers to such reports; II - Copy of claims considered to be allowable/ patentable by OEE; III - Copy of prior art documents mentioned by OEE in its technical examination reports; Sole paragraph. Documents requested by the BRPTO that are originally not in Portuguese, Spanish or English should be submitted to the BRPTO with a simple translation into one of these languages, at the applicant s discretion. Article 23. This Rule enters into force on January 11, 2016. LUIZ OTÁVIO PIMENTEL President JÚLIO CÉSAR CASTELO BRANCO REIS MOREIRA Patent Director Article 18. When prioritized prosecution is granted, patent application examination should not commence until 60 days after its publication, under article 31 of the Brazilian IP Statute. Article 19. The BRPTO-USPTO PPH Pilot Project does not affect the fundamental principle of independence of exams set out in Article 4bis of the Paris Convention for the Protection of Industrial Property. Article 20. The BRPTO-USPTO PPH Pilot Project does not exempt the applicant from complying with the provisions of the Brazilian IP Statute on patent applications filed in the BRPTO. Article 21. Patent application examinations made via the BRPTO-USPTO PPH Pilot Project should comply with Brazilian laws and other proceedings applicable on the date of examination. Article 22. Throughout the prosecution of the 5

ANNEX I INTERNATIONAL PATENT CLASSIFICATION SYMBOLS IPC In order to participate in the BRPTO-USPTO PPH Pilot Project, patent applications should be classified into at least one of the International Patent Classification Symbols IPC, including IPC s relevant lower levels of classification, as below: a) B01 - Chemical or Physical Appliances or Processes in General; b) B63 - Ships or other vessels; related equipment; c) C09K8 - Compositions for well or hole drilling; Compositions for well or hole treating, e.g., for finishing or repair operations; d) C10 - Oil, gas or coke industries; fuels; lubes; peat; e) E02 - Hydraulic engineering; foundations; earthwork; f) E21 - Soil drilling; mining; g) F15 - Actuator by fluid pressure; hydraulics or pneumatics in general; h) F16 - Elements or unit of engineering; general measures to ensure and maintain effective operation of machinery or facilities; i) F17 - Storage or distribution of gases or liquids; j) G01 - Measurement; Testing. ANNEX II CLAIM CORRESPONDENCE TABLE Claim requested in the BRPTO Claim Correspondence Table Claim patented Comment on correspondence in the USPTO 6

Rio de Janeiro Rua da Assembleia, 10/4108 20011-901 Brazil T + 55 21 3550 3700 F + 55 21 3550 3777 info@lickslegal.com São Paulo Rua George Ohm, 230 - A/112 04576-020 Brazil T + 55 11 3033 3700 F + 55 11 3033 3777 info@lickslegal.com Tokyo Chiyoda Kaikan Bldg. 6F 1-6-17 Kudan Minami Chiyoda-Ku 102-0074 Japan T + 81 3 6256 8972 F + 81 3 6735 8982 japan@lickslegal.com