c-aq~6a C Region 4 USPS Case No. and ) EO1N-4E-C NATIONAL ASSOCIATION ) NALC Case No. OF LETTER CARRIERS, ) DRT (, AFL-CIO,

Similar documents
NATIONAL ARBITRATION PANEL ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) } ) ) ) ) )

REGULAR REGIONAL ARBITRATION

C- a 374D, National Arbitration Panel. and ) Case No. E90C-4E-C John W. Dockins, Esquire. Darryl J. Anderson, Esquire

REGULAR ARBITRATION PANEL

BEFORE THE ARBITRATOR

Arbitration Decision i United States Postal Service in Case No. S1N-3D-D The Issue

(:::--: at / 6 4 ~_3 6

NATIONAL ARBITRATION PANEL

LOCAL MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING BETWEEN U.S. POSTAL SERVICE, WILLINGBORO, NJ, AND SOUTH JERSEY AREA LOCAL, APWU

JUN 2 0 Z005 REGULAR ARBITRATION PANEL

UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE CASE NOS. NC-C-7933 and NC-N and NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF LETTER : CARRIERS, AFL-CIO ISSUED : BACKGROUND

and POST OFFICE : Smithtown, NY

IN ARBITRATION PROCEEDINGS PURSUANT TO ARTICLE 15 OF THE NATIONAL AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE PARTIES. W8N-5K - C Local

C~ ~ 1ol C) g NATIONAL ARBITRATION PANEL. GRIEVANT: Class Action. In the Matter of the Arbitration. POST OFFICE: Miami, Florida.

C~O9 ~ i g. United States Postal Service ) Class Action REGULAR ARBITRATION SOUTHERN REGION USPS - NALC

G-4 l 0 `7 q g REGULAR ARBITRATION PANEL

Memorandum of Understanding Between Branch No. 916, NALC And United States Postal Service Springfield, Oregon

FOR THE NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF LETTER CARRIERS : George White, Local Business Agent rsa v

REGULAR REGIONAL ARBITRATION PANEL. Discipline. ) Termination

MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING BETWEEN THE AND NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF LETTER CARRIERS AFL-CIO BRANCH 100 TOLEDO, OHIO

For the U.S. Postal Service : Charles H. Isabel

^jei^ Cf/i/pQ. '"'''<n REGULAR ARBITRATION PANEL IN THE MATTER OF ARBITRATION

QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS ON USPS/NALC DISPUTE RESOLUTION PROCESS TEST.5-1- "'l 8

This case involves a dispute over the. Service's refusal to grant Continuation of Pay. to the grievant and reinstate annual leave he

NATIONAL ARBITRATION PANEL

C<;'i /6 6 7 ~ OPINION AND AWARD. In the Matter of Arbitration ) Between ) UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE )

APPEARANCES. At an arbitration on March 6, 1985 in the conference room of the First National

BACKGROUND OF THE ARTICLE 15 DISPUTE RESOLUTION PROCESS

Statement of the Case

REGULAR ARBITRATION PANEL. UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE. CASE NO. : S7N-3W-D GTS NO. : and

REGULAR ARBITRATION PANEL. Grievant : Post Office : United States Postal Service ) Case No : B94N-4B-C and ) GTS No : AWARD SDI+MSARY

The hearing in the above-matter was held or' July 20, as Arbitrator in accordance with the provisions of the Collective

REGULAR ARBITRATION PANEL. In the Matter of Arbitration ) Grievant : K. Reilly between ) Post Office : Stamford, CT

David E. Blackley, Esq., Deputy Corporation Counsel Thomas Passuite, Lockport Fire Dep t Chief

REGULAR REGIONAL ARBITRATION

RE : SIN-3W-C-4642 Grievance of S. Nimphius Tampa, FL. ARBITRATOR: John F. Caraway, selected by mutual agreement of the parties

EMPLOYMENT JAMS POLICY ON EMPLOYMENT ARBITRATION MINIMUM STANDARDS OF PROCEDURAL FAIRNESS

an Opinion and Award in its case number A Hearing was held at the University, on

ARBITRATION APPEAL PROCEDURE OF MICHIGAN

ARBITRATION AWARD. -and- Case Nos. H1N-3U-C NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF LETTER H1N-3U-C CARRIERS

THE NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF LETTER CARRIERS

ARBITRATION DECISION NO.: 55. UNION: OCSEA, Local 11, AFSCME, AFL-CIO. EMPLOYER: Department of Mental Health, Oakwood Forensic Center

RU DDDD REGULAR ARBITRATION PANEL. In the Matter of Arbitration. between. Class Action. Grievance : UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE.

AlA. l between UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE. and. BEFORE : Gary L. Axon, ARBITRATOR APPEARANCES : For the U. S. Postal Service : For the Union :

Commercial Arbitration Rules and Mediation Procedures (Including Procedures for Large, Complex Commercial Disputes)

t IN THE MATTER OF ARBITRATION BETWEEN ) GRIEVANT : Class Actions

i i ( In the Matter of the Arbitration ) ( GRIEVANT : G GAUNA between ) ( POST OFFICE : BRAWLEY, UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE )

Trade Rules USPLTA 2016 Trade Rules ADOPTED, OCTOBER 22, 1994 AMENDED AND ADOPTED OCTOBER 17, 2008

CALIFORNIA YACHT BROKERS ASSOCIATION

BEFORE THE ARKANSAS WORKERS COMPENSATION COMMISSION CLAIM NO. G DONALD MULLENIX CLAIMANT CITY OF CASH RESPONDENT EMPLOYER

ARBITRATION AWARD. -and- Case No. H1N-3U-C Subject : Seniority - Duration of Hold- Down Assignment

USPS - NALC CONTRACTUAL GRIEVANCE PROCEEDINGS CENTRAL REGION ARBITRATION OPINION AND AWARD APPEARANCES

CALIFORNIA RULES OF COURT Title 3. Civil Rules Division 8. Alternative Dispute Resolution Chapter 1. General Provisions

NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF LETTER CARRIERS CONNECTICUT MERGED BRANCH 20 BY-LAWS

c~ - ~ ppr F~,w~iVED (REGULAR ARBITRATION PANEL Un the Matter of the Arbitration Woonsocket RI Post Office : between

STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION DIVISION OF FLORIDA CONDOMINIUMS, TIMESHARES AND MOBILE HOMES

American Arbitration Association Arbitration Pursuant to Agreement of the Parties Before Timothy J. Brown, Esquire

Subj: USE OF BINDING ARBITRATION FOR CONTRACT CONTROVERSIES

Marlborough, Massachusetts

CLARK V. SAVIDGE SENTINEL VOLUME 33, ISSUE 11 NOVEMBER 2009

National Association of Letter Carriers Queen City Branch #43 N.A.L.C./AFL~CIO 4100 Colerain Avenue Cincinnati, Ohio Telephone:

REGULAR ARBITRATION OPINION AND AWARD. In the Matter of the Arbitration ) GRIEVANT : Judy Boyle

CLARK V. SAVIDGE SENTINEL

X

Unadjudicated Discipline Management Still Can t Use It in Arbitration

SUMMARY JURY TRIALS IN NORTH CAROLINA

RULES OF THE TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT OF LABOR AND WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT CHAPTER MEDIATION AND HEARING PROCEDURES TABLE OF CONTENTS

Construction Industry Arbitration Rules and Mediation Procedures (Including Procedures for Large, Complex Construction Disputes)

XX... 2 CHAPTER 823. INTEGRATED COMPLAINTS, HEARINGS, AND APPEALS... 3

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA BEFORE THE NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD REGION 5. Case 5-CA

REGULAR ARBITRATION PANEL WESTERN REGION CASE NO: F90N-4F-D W. Jefferson Boulevard Inglewood, CA 90311

National Patent Board Non-Binding Arbitration Rules TABLE OF CONTENTS

Minnesota No-Fault, Comprehensive or Collisions Damage Automobile Insurance Arbitration RULES

ARTICLE 8 GRIEVANCE PROCEDURE

ANNEX V PROCEDURAL RULES ON CONCILIATION AND ARBITRATION OF CONTRACTS FINANCED BY THE EUROPEAN DEVELOPMENT FUND (EDF)

Wills and Trusts Arbitration RULES

COMPREHENSIVE JAMS COMPREHENSIVE ARBITRATION RULES & PROCEDURES

To adopt a uniform procedure to be followed when enforcing covenants and rules to facilitate the efficient operation of the Association.

ROAD USE AGREEMENT. WHEREAS, Operator intends to engage in Natural Gas Activities at various locations in the Municipality; and

AAA Healthcare. Payor Provider Arbitration Rules and Mediation Procedures. Available online at adr.org/healthcare

SOUTHERN GLAZER S WINE AND SPIRITS, LLC. EMPLOYMENT ARBITRATION POLICY

AAA Commercial Arbitration Rules and Mediation Procedures (Including Procedures for Large, Complex, Commercial Disputes)

) ) ) ) Marvin Hill Arbitrator APPEARANCES

Alternate Dispute Resolution

Wills and Trusts Arbitration RULES

DEPOSIT AGREEMENT FOR MAINTENANCE OF SITE PLAN IMPROVEMENTS WITH LETTER OF CREDIT

BEFORE THE ARBITRATOR. In the Matter of the Arbitration of a Dispute Between THE APPLETON PROFESSIONAL POLICE ASSOCIATION. and THE CITY OF APPLETON

NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF LETTER CARRIERS

STATE OF CONNECTICUT LABOR DEPARTMENT CONNECTICUT STATE BOARD OF LABOR RELATIONS

FINAL AGREEMENT FOR LAND DIVISION IMPROVEMENTS IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE TOWN OF WESTPORT CODE FOR TOWN OF WESTPORT, DANE COUNTY, WISCONSIN

NINTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR ORANGE AND OSCEOLA COUNTIES, FLORIDA

USPS- NALC ARBITRATION PANEL SOUTHERN REGION WILLIAM J. LeWINTER, ARBITRATOR

MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING RECOGNITION

Buckeye Branch 78, Columbus Ohio By-Laws

The Arbitration-Ready Grievance

rbitration Volume 8 Issue 3 October 2004

VOLUNTARY LABOR ARBITRATION

FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT PROCEDURES AND GUIDELINES

Federal Mediation and Conciliation Service Arbitration Pursuant to Agreement of the Parties Before Timothy J. Brown, Esquire

TERMS OF AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE MAHWAH ASSOCIATION OF SUPERVISORS AND THE MAHWAH TOWNSHIP BOARD OF EDUCATION

Transcription:

c-aq~6a REGULAR ARBITRATION R SEP 2 e 2003 C Region 4 In the Matter of Arbitration between : ) Class Action Grievance UNITED STATES POSTAL ) Post Office : SERVICE, ) Columbine Hills (Center Littleton) Employer, ) USPS Case No. and ) EO1N-4E-C 03124822 NATIONAL ASSOCIATION ) NALC Case No. OF LETTER CARRIERS, ) DRT (,4-040076 AFL-CIO, Union. (01-T 0 9 2003 Before Robert D. Steinberg, Arbitrator Appearances : USPS : Paul J. Neumann, Labor Relations Specialist NALC : Roger Bledsoe, Regional Administrative Assistant Place of Hearing : 5703 Prince Street, Littleton, CO Date of Hearing : August 19, 2003 Date of Award : September 24, 2003 VICE PRESIDENT'S OFFICE NALC HEADQUARTERS Relevant Contract Provision : National Agreement, Articles 10 and 19 Contract Year : 2002 Type of Grievance : Contract Interpretation 1

AWARD SUMMARY The Union alleges an increasingly heavy snow storm in the Denver area on March 18, 2003, was an "Act of God" affecting the general community, which largely prevented the delivery of mail. Because of the gravity of the situation and because there was no work to be performed, Management should have sent the Letter Carriers at Columbine Hills, CO, home on paid administrative leaves. For reasons set forth infra, the grievance is sustained. DATED : September 24, 2003 2 c Robert D. Steinberg Arbitrator 2

SUMMARY OF THE FACTS Columbine Hills is one of five stations within the jurisdiction of the particular Denver, CO, Postmaster. It commenced snowing in the late hours of March 17, 2003, and by the Carriers' 8 a.m. report time on March 18, it had already deposited six inches of snow. While 40 of 41 scheduled Carriers reported for work, mail delivery to the station itself was delayed and it was uncertain whether the Carriers would be able to service their routes. They cased the mail on hand and awaited further instruction. Between 10 :30-11 : 30 a.m., the Postmaster ordered the mail to be delivered as best as possible, and after a check ofthe nearby roads, the Station Manager instructed Carriers to stay on the main, plowed roads within a five - mile radius. Three Carriers delivered all or most of their respective routes. Others made an attempt to deliver but were largely unsuccessful. Two ofthem testified (one by stipulation) to having been told by Management or supervision to return to the station. Several Carriers did not make an attempt to deliver mail because of safety and family concerns. All who wished to do so were allowed to leave, and most did so between 1 and 3 p.m. after completing Form 3971 where each had to signify whether the work hours missed would be treated as annual leave or LWOP. According to all who testified, the weather conditions were worsening throughout the day, and according to at least one, by midafternoon up to a foot of snow had fallen. The snow continued to fall into March 20, and the media reported the snowstorm to be the worst in a century. March 19 was treated as a community disaster by the Employer and employees remained home that day on administrative leave. The Union timely grieved the failure of the Postmaster to grant administrative paid time off for employees leaving work early on March 18. The Dispute Resolution Team representatives could not agree as to the severity of the storm and which party was correct in its interpretation of ELM 3

519.21. It did certify as a matter of fact that there was no (meaningfirl ) work to be performed at the Columbine Hills station by 1 :00 p.m. ISSUE The parties stipulated the following issue as properly before the undersigned for final and binding award : Did the Employer violate JACAM (Articles 10 and 19) and ELM Section 519 when it refused to grant administrative leave for employees who left work early on March 18, 2003? If so, what is the appropriate remedy? CONTROLLING CONTRACTUAL LANGUAGE While agreeing that Articles 10 and 19 are the relevant provisions of the National Agreement, the parties stipulated ELM Section 519, Administrative Leave, controls : "519 Administrative Leave "519.1 Definition "Administrative leave is absence from duty authorized by appropriate postal officials without charge to annual or sick leave and without loss of pay. "519.2 Events and Procedures for Granting Administrative Leave "519.21 Acts of God "519.211 General "Acts of God involve community disasters such as fire, flood, or storms. The disaster situation must be general rather than personal in scope and impact. It must prevent groups of employees from working or reporting to work. "19.212 Authorizing Administrative Leave for Acts of God "The following provisions concern administrative leave for acts of God : 4

"1. Postmasters and other installation heads have authority to approve administrative leave for up to 1 day.... "519.214 Early Dismissal Due to Acts of God "When employees are dismissed from duty before the normal completion oftheir duty due to an "act of God," the following applies : "a. Full-time employees are entitled to credit for hours worked plus enough administrative leave to complete their tour of duty. This combination ofwork and leave is not to exceed 8 hours in any 1 day. "b. Part-time regular employees are entitled to credit for hours worked plus enough administrative leave to complete their scheduled tour of duty. This combination of work and leave is not to exceed 8 hours in any 1 days. "c. Part-time flexible employees are entitled to credit for hours worked plus enough administrative leave to complete their scheduled tour. The combination of straight time worked and administrative leave may not exceed 8 hours in a service day." SUMMARY OF PARTY POSITIONS Union : The conditions of ELM Section 519.21 were met. The March 18, 2003, snowstorm constituted an "Act of God, " it was general rather than personal in scope and impact, and it prevented most ofthe employees at Columbine Hills from delivering the mail. The credible testimony of Letter Carriers is that it became largely impossible for them to function on the road and that Management or supervision instructed certain Carriers to return to the station, where after returning undelivered mail to the station, there was nothing for the Carriers to do. Under the above-referenced conditions, the Postmaster was required, but failed, to send employees home, granting them administrative leave. [citations omitted.] 5

Employer : The Union must justify its claim by a preponderance of evidence, and it has failed to do so. Snowstorms are not unusual in the Denver area, all but one Carrier reported to work and mostly on time. Most voluntarily left work early for personal reasons. Mail delivery, within the limitations set by Management, was proper, several Carriers completed all or a substantial portion of their routes, and employees knew they would be leaving on LWOP or on annual leave if they left early. The Postmaster' s decision not to grant administrative leave was proper. The Service cannot afford to let employees be the decision -maker. It is a question of both customer service and economics, and the Employer ' s judgment is entitled to deference. [ citations omitted.] DISCUSSION I have carefully read the many awards tendered by the parties, and it is clear there is no dispute among neutrals as to the controlling factors set forth in ELM Section 519. Beyond that, however, application differs widely depending upon the extant facts and circumstances and the impression testimonial and documentary evidence has made upon the respective arbitrator. When and how to excuse employees from work is Management ' s decision to initially make, and it is appropriate to defer to the judgment of Management absent a persuasive showing that its exercise of discretion was faulty. The Union must prove, in effect, an abuse, and it met its burden in the case at hand. Road conditions were somewhat treacherous by the 8 a.m. report time, but Carriers were able to report to work, even with difficulty. The mail truck was not so fortunate, and the Carriers had ample time to case the mail on hand and to confer with Management as to whether they would work their routes. Management hesitated making this decision until it secured an updated weather 6

projection and it tested road conditions. It was not until late morning the Postmaster made the decision to deliver where reasonably possible, and delivery was restricted to main arteries within a five-mile radius of the station. Both Carriers, and supervision when leaving to inspect the routes, were getting stuck going from and coming to the station. It was evident from all who testified that the snowstorm and road conditions were increasingly worsening. The Station Manager willingly released all who wanted to leave work rather than attempt delivery oftheir routes, understanding their safety and family concerns. By early afternoon, he and/or his supervisor were concerned with the difficulties certain Carriers were having circumnavigating their routes and told these Carriers to return to the station. It is apparent that conditions had worsened to the extent that only an extraordinary effort by two or three Carriers enabled them to complete most or all of their abbreviated routes, and in order to do so, they had to extend into overtime hours. By stipulation, and as supported by credible evidence, there was no work to be performed by Carriers once they unloaded their vehicles after returning to the station, or by 1 :00 p.m. for those not leaving. With the existing confusion, one or two Carriers, who had made an effort to deliver and had returned by mid-afternoon, sat around for an hour or more doing nothing, not realizing they could go home. Those who decided to leave early, and most left between 12 :30-1 :30 p.m., believed they were under direction to work routes or go home, not to sit idly by in the station. Those opting to leave early cannot be said to have made a "Voluntary" choice. The increasingly severe snowstorm prohibited, or so they thought, safe, effective mail delivery, and there was no other work for them to perform. The Station Manager echoed their concern as to safety and the worsening conditions and, after the fact, told others he believed administrative leave would have been appropriate. 7

On this evidence record, the inescapable conclusion is that by the afternoon of March 18, the Denver area was in the throes of a severe snowstorm constituting an Act of God. It did not merely affect isolated individuals but adversely affected a majority of the Carriers and, increasingly, the community as a whole. The Service had made the effort to perform its function as per its credo but had reached a state of severely diminished capacity. By the time the majority of employees sought to leave, the worsening snowstorm was preventing a "group of employees from working..." which allowed for the granting of administrative leave. Credible evidence attests to the fact that circa. 1 p.m. on March 18, 2003, all but a handful of the Columbine Hills Carriers could no longer function outside or in, and conditions dictated they be dismissed due to an Act of God. From a safety standpoint and because there was no more mail to case, it was then appropriate to grant the employees administrative leave. At that point, the Postmaster's failure to do so, at least for the employees of Columbine Hills, was indefensible. An examination of the actual hours worked by Carriers that day indicates a minim um of 4'/4 hours was the norm. Accordingly, those employees who had to take annual leave or were otherwise treated as being on LWOP should be made whole, treated as having worked a regular eight hours. AWARD Having fully reviewed the evidence record, upon due deliberation and for the reasons set forth above, the undersigned impartial arbitrator hereby renders the following Award : 1. The Employer violated the National Agreement and ELM Section 519 when it refused to grant administrative leave for those employees who left work early on March 18, 2003, 8

2. Employees who were forced to take annual leave shall have their leave bank restored up to a maximum of 3'/< hours. 3. Employees who were not paid for the time after they left (LWOP' d) are entitled to administrative leave by up to a maximum of 3'/. hours. Respectfully submitted, DATED : September 24, 2003 Robert D. Steinberg Arbitrator 9