Case 4:14-md CW Document 615 Filed 03/29/17 Page 1 of 9

Similar documents
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA OAKLAND DIVISION NOTICE OF PROPOSED CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT

Case 4:14-md CW Document Filed 02/03/17 Page 2 of 67

Case 3:10-md RS Document 2285 Filed 04/18/17 Page 1 of 7

Case 3:10-md RS Document 2284 Filed 04/18/17 Page 1 of 7

Case 3:10-md RS Document 2860 Filed 09/18/18 Page 1 of 6

Case: 1:13-cv Document #: 511 Filed: 07/02/18 Page 1 of 6 PageID #:11585

Case 4:08-cv JSW Document 250 Filed 05/25/16 Page 1 of 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Case 2:14-cv JCC Document 98 Filed 11/24/15 Page 1 of 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE

Case: 1: 1 0-cv Document #: 77 Filed: 03/22/11 Page 1 of 9 PageID #:569

Case 2:06-cv R-CW Document 437 Filed 10/12/12 Page 1 of 11 Page ID #:7705

Case Case 1:10-cv AKH Document Document Filed 03/16/15 03/13/15 Page 11of9

Case 4:13-md YGR Document 1292 Filed 05/26/16 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA OAKLAND DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

Case 4:14-md CW Document 582 Filed 03/01/17 Page 1 of 9

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF IDAHO ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CLASS ACTION

Case 4:13-md YGR Document 1714 Filed 03/20/17 Page 1 of 17 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA OAKLAND DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION ORDER PRELIMINARILY APPROVING SETTLEMENT AND PROVIDING FOR NOTICE

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO. Plaintiff, j Judge: Hon. Joan M. Lewis ) ) )

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OFPENNSVLVAJ'ELA ORDER PRELIMINARILY APPROVING SETTLEMENT AND PROVIDING FOR NOTICE

Case 3:12-md EMC Document 421 Filed 03/01/16 Page 1 of 22

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA OAKLAND DIVISION

Case 1:15-cv WHP Document 148 Filed 06/28/18 Page 1 of 14

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA Case No. 1:08-CV WTL-JMS

Case 9:14-cv WPD Document 251 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/10/2017 Page 1 of 16 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

Case 3:10-md RS Document 2260 Filed 04/03/17 Page 1 of 15

Case: 1:13-cv Document #: 382 Filed: 03/08/18 Page 1 of 14 PageID #:7778

Plaintiff, Defendant. for Denbury Resources, Inc. ("Denbury" or "Defendant") shares pursuant to the merger of

Case3:11-cv EMC Document70 Filed03/06/14 Page1 of 43

Case 2:16-cv RSL Document 84 Filed 03/23/18 Page 1 of 7

Case: 1:15-cv Document #: 169 Filed: 12/01/17 Page 1 of 7 PageID #:2786

Case 4:10-cv YGR Document Filed 06/17/16 Page 1 of 11

Case 5:05-cv RMW Document 97 Filed 08/08/2007 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

NOTICE OF PENDENCY AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION AND SETTLEMENT HEARING

Case 1:12-cv JSR Document 63 Filed 11/12/14 Page 1 of 13

Case 3:09-cv JPG-PMF Document 47 Filed 01/11/11 Page 1 of 7 Page ID #466

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Case 5:12-cv SOH Document 457 Filed 04/08/19 Page 1 of 9 PageID #: 12296

Case 2:07-cv KJD-RJJ Document 95 Filed 02/04/10 Page 1 of 9

Case5:10-cv RMW Document207 Filed03/11/14 Page1 of 7

Case3:14-cv VC Document45 Filed01/12/15 Page1 of 43

Case 3:13-cv HSG Document 133 Filed 01/19/16 Page 1 of 5

Case: 1:12-cv Document #: 576 Filed: 07/06/17 Page 1 of 15 PageID #:22601

Case 4:13-cv YGR Document 126 Filed 09/07/16 Page 1 of 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

You Could Get Money From $44.95 Million in Settlements A Federal Court authorized this Notice. This is not a solicitation from a lawyer.

Case: 1:14-cv Document #: 58 Filed: 11/10/15 Page 1 of 10 PageID #:314

GRANTED WITH MODIFICATIONS

Case 1:12-cv VEC Document 186 Filed 05/27/15 Page 1 of 11. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK x

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF JACKSON COUNTY, MISSOURI, AT INDEPENDENCE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA INDIANAPOLIS DIVISION

Case 4:10-cv CW Document 730 Filed 12/05/17 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA OAKLAND DIVISION

Case 1:15-md AJT-TRJ Document 1524 Filed 06/15/18 Page 1 of 12 PageID# 17458

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Case 1:12-cv GBD Document 47 Filed 01/19/16 Page 1 of 13

[QIJ$&J ORDER PRELIMINARILY APPROVING SETTLEMENT AND

Case3:10-cv SI Document135 Filed07/11/12 Page1 of 6

Case 4:13-md YGR Document Filed 09/29/16 Page 1 of 5

Case 4:16-cv CW Document 75-4 Filed 08/14/18 Page 1 of 7

Case 1:06-cv WMN Document 270 Filed 03/02/10 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MARYLAND

Case 2:16-cv JMA-SIL Document 5 Filed 12/27/16 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 88 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS, EASTERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE. No. 2:08-md MJP. Lead Case No. C MJP

Case 1:12-cv RM-KMT Document 239 Filed 03/06/17 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 10 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Case 2:14-cv MCE-KJN Document 87 Filed 07/08/16 Page 1 of 14

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

U.S. District Court District of Colorado (Denver) CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 1:12-cv RBJ

Case 1:13-cv WHP Document 571 Filed 06/02/16 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Case: 4:16-cv JAR Doc. #: 97 Filed: 12/13/18 Page: 1 of 10 PageID #: 2279

Case 4:13-md YGR Document Filed 02/08/18 Page 1 of 38 EXHIBIT EE

Case 1:09-cv SAS Document 59-1 Filed 06/28/11 Page 1 of 9 EXHIBIT A

Case 4:06-cv CW Document 81 Filed 03/25/2008 Page 1 of 10

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Case: 1:12-cv Document #: 117 Filed: 08/12/14 Page 1 of 11 PageID #:706

Case 4:02-cv SPF-FHM Document 1550 Filed in USDC ND/OK on 10/05/2006 Page 1 of 12

Case 3:14-cv SI Document 240 Filed 11/21/17 Page 1 of 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF OREGON

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION

Your legal rights may be affected even if you do not act. Please read this Notice carefully. YOUR RIGHTS AND CHOICES

Case 2:07-cv RAJ Document 87 Filed 03/27/2009 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE

I ELECTRONICALLY FILED

Case3:13-cv SC Document99 Filed06/05/15 Page2 of 7 1 WHEREAS, Plaintiffs Arville Winans and Wilma Fritz in this action entitled Arville 2 Winans

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. Judge:

Case 3:15-cv RBL Document 214 Filed 05/16/18 Page 1 of 8

FINALLY CERTIFYING A CLASS

Case 3:17-cv EMC Document 49 Filed 08/26/18 Page 1 of 15

Case 3:13-cv HSG Document Filed 03/17/16 Page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

Case 1:17-cv AT Document 77 Filed 09/14/18 Page 1 of 12

Case 3:10-md RS Document Filed 04/03/17 Page 1 of 15

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

Case 8:11-cv JST-JPR Document Filed 08/16/13 Page 1 of 6 Page ID #:5240

Case3:12-cv WHO Document276 Filed02/14/14 Page1 of 13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA.

Case: 1:17-cv Document #: 25 Filed: 10/18/17 Page 1 of 8 PageID #:156 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

EXCLUDE YOURSELF OBJECT QUESTIONS? VISIT

GRANTED WITH MODIFICATIONS

Case 3:14-cv PGS-LHG Document 130 Filed 05/14/18 Page 1 of 9 PageID: 4283

Case 3:17-cv JAG Document 41 Filed 02/21/18 Page 1 of 8 PageID# 258

Case 3:18-cv DMS-MDD Document 256 Filed 10/09/18 PageID.4031 Page 1 of 6

Case 4:11-cv JSW Document Filed 08/19/16 Page 1 of 26

COURT Case 2 : 04-cv RC Document 264 Filed 11/08 /20 NOV ^ [CENL-7'^AL

Transcription:

Case :-md-0-cw Document Filed 0// Page of 0 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA OAKLAND DIVISION IN RE: NATIONAL COLLEGIATE ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION ATHLETIC GRANT-IN-AID CAP ANTITRUST LITIGATION This Document Relates to: ALL ACTIONS EXCEPT Jenkins v. Nat l Collegiate Athletic Ass n Case No. -cv-0-cw No. :-md--cw AMENDED ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT ACTION FILED: COMPLAINT FILED: March,

Case :-md-0-cw Document Filed 0// Page of 0 Now before the Court is Plaintiffs Unopposed Motion for Preliminary Approval of Class Action Settlement. The Court has considered the parties papers, relevant legal authority, and the record in this case, and the Court hereby GRANTS the Motion for Preliminary Approval. WHEREAS, Plaintiffs, on behalf of themselves and on behalf of the proposed Settlement Classes, and Defendants, National Collegiate Athletic Association, Pac- Conference, The Big Ten Conference, Inc., The Big Conference, Inc., Southeastern Conference, Atlantic Coast Conference, American Athletic Conference, Conference USA, Mid-American Athletic Conference, Inc., Mountain West Conference, Sun Belt Conference, and Western Athletic Conference (collectively, Defendants ) have agreed, subject to Court approval, to settle the above captioned litigation upon the terms set forth in the February, Settlement Agreement, Dkt. 0-, as amended by the February, Joint Stipulation Amending Settlement Agreement, Dkt., and the March, Second Joint Stipulation Amending Settlement Agreement, Dkt. 0 (collectively and as amended, the Settlement Agreement ); WHEREAS, this Court has reviewed and considered the Settlement Agreement entered into among the parties, as well as all exhibits thereto, the record in this case, the briefs and arguments of counsel, and supporting exhibits; WHEREAS, Plaintiffs have moved for an order granting preliminary approval of the Settlement Agreement; WHEREAS, the only objection to preliminary approval of the Settlement was filed by Lamar Dawson, a member of the proposed settlement class, Dkt. ( Objection to Proposed Settlement ), to which Plaintiffs and Defendants jointly responded, Dkt. ( Joint Response to Lamar Dawson s Objection to Proposed Settlement ), contending that Dawson s objection should be overruled; WHEREAS, this Court preliminarily finds, for purposes of settlement only, that the action meets all the prerequisites of Rule of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure; WHEREAS, all defined terms contained herein shall have the same meanings as set forth in the Settlement Agreement; APPROVAL OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT - No: -md- --

Case :-md-0-cw Document Filed 0// Page of 0 NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED:. The Court does hereby preliminarily approve the Settlement Agreement, subject to further consideration at the final Fairness Hearing described below.. A final approval hearing (the Fairness Hearing ) shall be held before this Court on November,, at :00 a.m., at the United States District Court of the Northern District of California, located at 0 Clay Street, Courtroom th Floor, Oakland, CA, to determine whether the proposed settlement on the terms and conditions provided for in the Settlement Agreement is fair, reasonable and adequate to the Settlement Classes and should be approved by the Court; whether final judgment should be entered; the amount of fees, costs, and expenses that should be awarded to Plaintiffs counsel; and the amount of any service awards to be awarded to the class representatives. The Court may change the day of the Fairness Hearing without further notice to the members of the Settlement Classes.. Pursuant to Rule of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the Court preliminarily certifies, for purposes of effectuating this settlement, Settlement Classes as follows: Division I FBS Football Class: All current and former NCAA Division I Football Bowl Subdivision ( FBS ) football student-athletes who, at any time from March, 0 through the date of Preliminary Approval of this Settlement, received from an NCAA member institution for at least one academic term (such as a semester or quarter) a Full Athletics Grant-In-Aid (defined herein). Division I Men s Basketball Class: All current and former NCAA Division I men s basketball student-athletes who, at any time from March, 0 through the date of Preliminary Approval of this Settlement, received from an NCAA member institution for at least one academic term (such as a semester or quarter) a Full Athletics Grant-In-Aid. Division I Women s Basketball Class: All current and former NCAA Division I women s basketball student-athletes who, at any time from March, 0 through the date of Preliminary Approval of this Settlement, received from an NCAA member institution for at least one academic term (such as a semester or quarter) a Full Athletics Grant-In-Aid. Full Athletics Grant-In-Aid means either () athletically related financial aid for any particular academic term (year, semester, or quarter), in an amount equal to or greater than tuition and fees, room and board, and required course-related books, or () athletically related financial aid that was not equal to or greater than tuition and fees, room and board, and required course-related APPROVAL OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT - No: -md- --

Case :-md-0-cw Document Filed 0// Page of 0 books only because it was reduced by the applicable NCAA member institution by an amount of nonathletically related financial aid received by the student-athlete.. The Court approves, as to form and content, the notice of the proposed Settlement Agreement, attached as Exhibit B to the Settlement Agreement. The Court further finds that the proposed notice campaign and all forms of notice substantially meets the requirements of Federal Rule of Civil Procedure and due process, is the best notice practicable under the circumstances, and shall constitute due and sufficient notice to all persons entitled thereto.. The Court confirms and appoints Gilardi & Co. LLC as the settlement notice administrator. The settlement notice administrator shall commence all aspects of the approved notice campaign, including direct notice mailing, internet notice, dedicated website and press release, as more fully set forth in the Vasquez Declaration Regarding Implementation of Class Notice Plan, in accordance with the schedule set forth below.. The Court approves, as to form and content, the Distribution Plan, attached as Exhibit A to the Settlement Agreement.. The Court designates Shawne Alston, Nicholas Kindler, Afure Jemerigbe, and D.J. Stephens as the class representatives for the Settlement Classes.. The Court designates the following as Class Counsel for the Settlement Classes: Hagens Berman Sobol Shapiro LLP; and Pearson, Simon & Warshaw, LLP.. The Court overrules class member Lamar Dawson s Objection to Proposed Settlement, Dkt.. 0. Class Counsel shall file their motion for attorney fees, costs, and service awards, and all supporting documentation and papers, no later than September,.. Any person who desires to file an objection to the Settlement or request exclusion from the Settlement Classes shall do so by September,, in conformance with the provisions of the settlement notice as approved above.. In particular, all written objections and supporting papers, if any, must (a) clearly APPROVAL OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT - No: -md- --

Case :-md-0-cw Document Filed 0// Page of 0 identify the case name and number (In Re: National Collegiate Athletic Association Athletic Grant- In-Aid Cap Antitrust Litigation, Case No. :-md--cw); (b) be submitted to the Court either by mailing them to the Class Action Clerk, United States District Court for the Northern District of California, 0 Clay Street, Oakland, CA, or by filing them in person at any location of the United States District Court for the Northern District of California; and (c) be filed or postmarked on or before September,.. By no later than August,, Settlement Class Members shall be able to see on the Settlement website at www.grantinaidsettlement.com an estimate of their individual gross and net recovery. Any member of the Settlement Class who believes the amount or calculation of their individual estimated gross or net recovery is wrong for some reason, or who believes that they did not receive direct mailed Notice of the Settlement and who believe they should be eligible for a recovery as a Class Member, can contact the Settlement Administrator to dispute their estimated recovery and/or their status as an eligible Class Member. Members of the Settlement Class must provide detailed information and all records to support such disputes to the Settlement Administrator. All disputes and supporting documentation must be received by the Settlement Administrator (or postmarked if mailed) no later than October,. After this date, Settlement Class Members will no longer be able to dispute their individual estimated gross or net recovery, or their status as an eligible Settlement Class Member. The resolution of any such dispute by the Settlement Administrator shall be final and non-appealable.. Any member of the Settlement Class may enter an appearance in the litigation, at his or her own expense, individually or through counsel of his or her own choice. If the member does not enter an appearance, he or she will be represented by Class Counsel.. All members of the Settlement Classes shall be bound by all determinations and judgments in the Lawsuit concerning the Settlement, whether favorable or unfavorable to the Settlement Classes.. Class Counsel shall file their motion for final approval of Settlement, and all supporting documentation and papers, no later than October,. APPROVAL OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT - No: -md- --

Case :-md-0-cw Document Filed 0// Page of 0. Class Counsel may file a written response to any objections to the Settlement Agreement, or to the application for attorneys fees, reimbursement of expenses, and class representative service awards, no later than days before the final Fairness Hearing, or by November,.. At the Fairness Hearing, Class Counsel shall provide the Court with any updated information available as of that date concerning any requests for exclusion received from the Settlement Classes, any objections received from the Settlement Classes, or any other communications received in response to the notice of settlement.. At or after the Fairness Hearing, the Court shall determine whether the Settlement Agreement, the motion for attorney s fees and expenses, and any service awards shall be finally approved.. All reasonable expenses incurred in notifying the Settlement Classes and administering the settlement shall be paid as set forth in the Settlement Agreement.. Neither the Settlement Agreement, nor any of its terms or provisions, nor any of the negotiations or proceedings connected with it, shall be construed as an admission or concession by Plaintiffs or Defendants, respectively, of the truth or falsity of any of the allegations made, or of any liability, fault or wrongdoing of any kind.. All members of the Settlement Classes are temporarily barred and enjoined from instituting or continuing the prosecution of any action asserting the claims released in the proposed Settlement, until the Court enters final judgment with respect to the fairness, reasonableness, and adequacy of the Settlement.. The Court adopts the following schedule proposed in the motion: Event Deadline Order re preliminary approval March,. APPROVAL OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT - No: -md- --

Case :-md-0-cw Document Filed 0// Page of 0 NCAA to request from member institutions potential class member contact information, including permission to use any contact information already collected for those individuals who are also class members in the settlement in In Re: National Collegiate Athletic Association Student-Athlete Concussion Litigation, MDL No., Master docket No. :-cv-0 (N.D.IL.) ( NCAA Concussion Settlement ) Notice campaign to begin, including internet notice, dedicated website, and press release Deadline for Defendants production to Administrator of class members contact information to the extent received March,. April,. August,. Direct notice mailing to begin August,. [two weeks from Administrator s receipt of contact information] Last day for motion for attorneys fees, costs, expenses, and service awards Last day to file objections to the Settlement or requests for exclusion from the Classes Last day to dispute estimated recovery or status as an eligible Class Member September,. [two weeks before objection deadline] September,. [thirty days from notice mailing] October, Last day for motion in support of final approval of Settlement Last day to respond to any objections to the Settlement Agreement, or to the application for attorneys fees, reimbursement of expenses, and class representative service awards Final Fairness Hearing APPROVAL OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT - No: -md- -- October,. [two weeks after objection deadline] November, [two weeks before Final Fairness Hearing] November,, at :00 a.m.

Case :-md-0-cw Document Filed 0// Page of. The Court reserves the right to adjourn, continue or otherwise change the date of the Fairness Hearing without further notice to the members of the Settlement Classes, and retains jurisdiction to consider all further applications arising out of or connected with the proposed Settlement Agreement. The members of the Settlement Classes are advised to confirm the date of the Fairness Hearing as set forth in the settlement notice. The Court may approve the Settlement Agreement, with such modifications as may be agreed to by the settling parties, if appropriate, without further notice to the Settlement Classes. 0 IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED: March, HONORABLE CLAUDIA WILKEN UNITED STATES DISTRICTJUDGE Submitted by: Dated: March, HAGENS BERMAN SOBOL SHAPIRO LLP By /s/ Steve W. Berman STEVE W. BERMAN Craig R. Spiegel (00) Ashley A. Bede (Pro Hac Vice) HAGENS BERMAN SOBOL SHAPIRO LLP Eighth Avenue, Suite 00 Seattle, WA 0 Telephone: () - Facsimile: () -0 steve@hbsslaw.com craigs@hbsslaw.com ashleyb@hbsslaw.com Jeff D. Friedman () HAGENS BERMAN SOBOL SHAPIRO LLP Hearst Avenue, Suite Berkeley, CA 0 Telephone: (0) -000 APPROVAL OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT - No: -md- --

Case :-md-0-cw Document Filed 0// Page of Facsimile: (0) -00 jefff@hbsslaw.com Bruce L. Simon () Aaron M. Sheanin () Benjamin E. Shiftan () PEARSON, SIMON & WARSHAW, LLP Montgomery Street, Suite 0 San Francisco, CA 0 Telephone: () -000 Facsimile: () -00 bsimon@pswlaw.com asheanin@pswlaw.com bshiftan@pswlaw.com Plaintiffs Co-Lead Class Counsel 0 APPROVAL OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT - No: -md- --