HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. No. 41/Rules/DHC Dated : PRACTICE DIRECTIONS

Similar documents
Through: Versus. Through: 2. To be referred to the reporter or not? Yes. 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?

THE COMMERCIAL COURTS, COMMERCIAL DIVISION AND COMMERCIAL APPELLATE DIVISION OF HIGH COURTS (AMENDMENT) BILL, 2018

M/S. SAIPEM TRIUNE ENGINEERING PVT. LTD. Plaintiff. - versus - INDIAN OIL PETRONAS PVT. LTD.

CHAPTER 4. Special Procedure. PART I CRIMINAL Part A SPECIAL RULES OF PROCEDURE IN ORIGINAL CRIMINAL CASES [OMITTED]

HIGH COURT OF DELHI: NEW DELHI NOTIFICATION. No. 100/Rules/DHC Dated: DELHI HIGH COURT (ORIGINAL SIDE) RULES, 2018

LABOUR COURT RULES, 2017 ARRANGEMENT OF RULES PART I PRELIMINARY

IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (The High Court of Assam, Nagaland, Mizoram and Arunachal Pradesh) Small Industries Development Bank of India ( SIDBI)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : LAND ACQUISITION ACT. LPA No.658 of 2011 & CM No /2011 VERSUS

THE COMMERCIAL COURTS, COMMERCIAL DIVISION AND COMMERCIAL APPELLATE DIVISION OF HIGH COURTS (AMENDMENT) BILL, 2018

Bangladesh Trade Marks Rules Amended on September 10, 1963

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI CIVIL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION CONTEMPT PETITION (C) NO. OF 2017 IN Writ Petition (Civil) No.

THE HIGH COURT OF MEGHALAYA SHILLONG N O T I F I C A T I O N

THE KARNATAKA HIGH COURT ACT, 1961

The Karnataka High Court Act, 1961

THE PUNJAB RIGHT TO SERVICE ACT, 2011 ( PUNJAB ACT NO.24 OF 2011.) A ACT

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION. CIVIL APPEAL NO OF 2016 (Arising out of SLP (C) No.

DRAFT RULES UNDER THE COMPANIES ACT, 2013

High Court of Judicature at Allahabad. Notice

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE BEFORE THE HON BLE MR. JUSTICE AJIT J GUNJAL. WRIT PETITION Nos /2010 (GM-RES),

Notification PART I CHAPTER I PRELIMINARY

Government of Bangladesh MINISTRY OF COMMERCE

AGREEMENT FOR LONG TERM ACCESS WITHOUT SYSTEM STRENGTHENING BETWEEN POWER GRID CORPORATION OF INDIA LIMITED AND. (Name of Long Term Customer)

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. % Judgment pronounced on: 20 th April, versus. Advocates who appeared in this case:

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL ORIGINAL WRIT JURISDICTION I.A NO OF 2012 WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) NO. OF 2012 ASSAM SANMILITA MAHASANGHA & ORS

THE PASSPORTS ACT, 1967 ARRANGEMENT OF SECTIONS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : LAND ACQUISITION ACT, Date of decision: WP(C) No. 3595/2011 and CM Nos.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU BEFORE THE HON BLE MR.JUSTICE RAVI MALIMATH WRIT PETITION NO OF 2010(MV)

BEFORE THE NATIONAL GREEN TRIBUNAL CENTRAL ZONAL BENCH BHOPAL. Original Application No. 129/2013 (CZ)

IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (THE HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)

HIGH COURT OF DELHI: NEW DELHI

NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL Checklist for Appeals under Companies Act, 2013 & Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. % Date of decision: WP(C) No. 416 of 2011 and CM Nos /2011. Versus

CHAPTER 16. Legal Practitioners. Part A THE FILING OF POWERS OF ATTORNEY BY PLEADERS IN SUBORDINATE COURTS

COURT OF APPEAL RULES 2009

IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (THE HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Co. Pet. 8/2015

THE ELECTION PETITIONS PROCEDURE RULES, KARNATAKA

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT :SERVICE MATTER WP(C) No.8133/2011 & CM No.2004/2012 Date of Decision:

HIGH COURT OF DELHI: NEW DELHI. The Roster of Sitting of Hon ble Judges of this Court effective from 25 th August, 2018 is as.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : INCOME TAX MATTER. Judgment delivered on: WP (C) 4642/2008

THE TRADE MARKS (AMENDMENT) BILL, 2009

PARLIAMENT OF INDIA RAJYA SABHA PRESIDENTIAL AND VICE-PRESIDENTIAL ELECTIONS

PRADEEP KUMAR MASKARA & ORS. Vs. STATE OF WEST BENGAL & ORS.

MINISTRY OF CORPORATE AFFAIRS NOTIFICATION New Delhi, the 20th December, 2016

HIGH COURT OF DELHI: NEW DELHI. The Roster of Sitting of Hon ble Judges of this Court effective from 1 st July, 2018 is as under:- Division Benches

HIGH COURT OF DELHI: NEW DELHI. The Roster of Sitting of Hon ble Judges of this Court effective from 2 nd January, 2018 is as under:- Division Benches

SOUTH AFRICA Trade Marks regulations Government Notice R578 of 21 April 1995 as amended by Government Notice R1180 of 1 December 2006

Bar & Bench (

HIGH COURT OF DELHI: NEW DELHI

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Ritesh Sinha son of Sh. Rabindra Narain Sinha, aged 36 years,

IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : SUIT FOR RECOVERY Date of decision: 17th July, 2013 RFA 383/2012. Versus

High Court of Karnataka Bengaluru, Dated: 27 th April 2018 NOTIFICATION NO. HCDB 52 / 2018

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : SOCIETIES REGISTRATION ACT Date of decision: 10th January, 2012 LPA No.18/2012

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : INCOME TAX ACT W.P.(C) 7933/2010. Date of Decision : 16th February, 2012.

Contempt of Courts (CAT) Rules, Rules to Regulate Proceedings for Contempt of the Supreme Court, 1975

BIHAR ELECTRICITY REGULATORY COMMISSION, PATNA FEES, FINES AND CHARGES REGULATIONS,

.. IN HIGH COURT OF DELHI:AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE. I.A. No /2006 in C.S.(OS) No.795/2004

1. OA 38/

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. 1. Writ Petition (Civil) No of Judgment reserved on: August 30, 2007

8. Foreign judgments which can be registered not to be enforceable otherwise

Central Excise Duty on free Samples

FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTION FOR ADVOCATES/LITIGANTS. Q.1. When will the applications for urgent hearings be listed before the Hon ble Court?

THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. % Judgment Pronounced on: versus -...Respondent

NOTIFICATION MINISTRY OF COMMERCE AND INDUSTRY DEPARTMENT OF INDUSTRIAL POLICY AND PROMOTION INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY APPELLATE BOARD

COURT NO. 2, ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, PRINCIPAL BENCH, NEW DELHI O.A. NO. 140 OF 2009

WIPO WORLD INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY ORGANISATION ARBITRATION RULES

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. W.P.(C) No.3245/2002 and CM No.11982/06, 761/07. Date of Decision: 6th August, 2008.

GOVERNMENT GAZETTE OF THE REPUBLIC OF NAMIBIA. N$17.60 WINDHOEK 9 May 2014 No. 5461

DELHI HIGH COURT (ORIGINAL SIDE) RUL ES, 2018

THE DELHI HIGH COURT (AMENDMENT) BILL, 2014

HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA DHARWAD BENCH

Labour Court Rules, 2006 ARRANGEMENT OF RULES PART I

THE STATE BANK OF SAURASHTRA (REPEAL) AND THE STATE BANK OF INDIA (SUBSIDIARY BANKS) AMENDMENT BILL, 2009

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : SERVICE MATTER W.P.(C) No.7886/2011 DATE OF DECISION : 15th July, 2013

THE READJUSTMENT OF REPRESENTATION OF SCHEDULED CASTES AND SCHEDULED TRIBES IN PARLIAMENTARY AND ASSEMBLY CONSTITUENCIES BILL, 2013

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH DATED THIS THE 4 TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2015 BEFORE THE HON BLE MR. JUSTICE K.N.

THE BANKING OMBUDSMAN SCHEME 2006 (including May 24, 2007 Amendments) NOTIFICATION. Ref.RPCD.BOS.No. 441 / / December 26, 2005

TRADEMARKS ACT R.S.A. c. T30

HIGH COURT OF DELHI: NEW DELHI

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. + FAO(OS) No.534/2010 & CM Nos /2010. versus. % Date of Hearing : August 25, 2010

Bar & Bench (

NOTIFICATION NO. HCKB 95/ 2018

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) NO.571 OF 2017

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU BEFORE THE HON BLE MR. JUSTICE ANAND BYRAREDDY

M/S. Iritech Inc vs The Controller Of Patents on 20 April, % Judgment pronounced on: 20th April, 2017

: 1 : IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA CIRCUIT BENCH, AT DHARWAD BEFORE THE HON BLE MR.JUSTICE H.N.NAGAMOHAN DAS. W.P. No /2012 (GM-CPC)

ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, LUCKNOW. Original Application No. 113 of Monday, this the 17 th day of April, 2017

IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA (ORIGINAL CIVIL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION)

CHAPTER XVI. Appeals and Revision Applications of Courts other than the High Court

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. Reserved on: % Date of Decision: WP(C) No.7084 of 2010

Prasenjit Mandal, J.:

The Central Sales Tax (R & T) Rules, 1957

PART 1. Government of West Bengal Medical and Public Health Department Medical Branch. No. Medl. 3356/2D-6/49 Calcutta, the 8 th August, 1949

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. + ARB.A. 5/2015 & IA 2340/2015 (for stay) versus

THE KARNATAKA PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION (CONDUCT OF BUSINESS AND ADDITIONAL FUNCTIONS) ACT, CHAPTER I CHAPTER II

$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. Judgement delivered on: 12 th January, W.P.(C) 7068/2014

$~21 to 34 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision: W.P.(C) 4304/2018 & CM APPL.16759/2018

THE RULES TO REGULATE PROCEEDINGS FOR CONTEMPT OF THE SUPREME COURT, 1975'

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION. CIVIL APPEAL NOS OF 2018 (Arising out of SLP(C) Nos.

THE ANCIENT MONUMENTS AND ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITES AND REMAINS (AMENDMENT) BILL, 2017

Transcription:

HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI No. 41/Rules/DHC Dated : 28.04.2016 PRACTICE DIRECTIONS Hon ble the Chief Justice, on the recommendations of the Rules Committee under section 123 of CPC of this Court has been pleased to issue following practice directions for information and compliance by all concerned :- With reference to Notice dated 10.01.1995, Practice Direction (Regarding Notice of Motion) No. 1/2002 dated 01.10.2002 and Practice Directions No. 31/Rules/DHC dated 16.01.2015 (copies enclosed), it is further directed that whenever an advance copy of a Writ Petition, Petition/Application under Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 as well as in other Original and Appellate Jurisdiction is required to be served upon an opposite party which is Union of India, State Government, Statutory Authority, Public Sector Undertaking or Government Department having Sr./Standing Counsel/Nominated/Empanelled Counsel, such an advance copy shall be served through the respective Sr./Standing Counsel/Nominated/Empanelled Counsel and shall not be served directly upon the concerned department so that there is no delay in transmission of briefs to the Sr./Standing Counsel/Nominated/Empanelled Counsels. These Practice Directions shall come into force immediately. By Order Sd/- (VINOD GOEL) REGISTRAR GENERAL

HIGH COURT OF DELHI: NEW DELHI January 10, 1995 N O T I C E The Counsel for the parties and the litigants are hereby informed that w.e.f. 16.01.1995, whenever an Application (C.M.) in Appellate Side cases and an Interlocutory Application (I.A.) in Original Side cases is filed in a pending case, the following requirements will be complied with by them :- a) where the Respondent/Defendant/Opposite party is represented by Counsel, a copy of the Application (C.M./I.A.) shall be served on the Counsel against receipt: b) The Applicant shall furnish to the Registry, name or names of all the Counsel for the Respondent/Defendants/Opposite parties so that these may be shown in the Cause List when the Application is listed for hearing: c) The Applicant shall inform by way of letter the Counsel for the Opposite Party about the likely date of hearing of the Application. It is further notified that in a case where a copy of the Application (C.M./I.A.) has been served on the Counsel for the Respondent/Defendant/Opposite parties, fresh notice of the Application (C.M./I.A.) will not be issued to the non-applicants of their counsel and appropriate orders will be passed at the first hearing of the Application (C.M./I.A.) Note: Service sent by way of certificate of posting will not be considered as sufficient compliance with this notice. The Registry shall ensure compliance of the aforesaid requirements. BY ORDER Sd/- REGISTRAR

HIGH COURT OF DELHI : NEW DELHI PRACTICE DIRECTION (Regarding Notice of Motion) No.1 of 2002 Dated 01.10.2002 1. In accordance with Rule 1-A in Part-II (Civil), Chapter 4-F(b), High Court Rules and Orders, Volume -V, an advance copy of a writ petition proposed to be filed is required to be served on the Nominated Counsel for certain designated authorities. (Notification No.495/Rules/DHC dated 17.11.1995). 2. In addition thereto, a Notice of Motion in the Form Annexure A shall be served on the Nominated Counsel stating the proposed date of first hearing of the writ petition. (As per amendment made in the aforesaid Rule 1-A vide Notification No. 119/Rules/DHC dated 01.10.2002). 3. If for any reason the writ petition is not listed for hearing on the specified date or within 3 days of the specified date, a fresh Notice of Motion in the Form Annexure B must be served on the Nominated Counsel stating the proposed new date of hearing. 4. Service of Notice of Motion and advance copy : a. Service by UPC will not be accepted by the Registry as adequate proof of service. b. Service on the opposite counsel/party by Registered post A/D, speed post or courier service will be accepted by the Registry as adequate proof of service, effective three clear days after the last date of despatch. Consequently, if the last date of despatch is, say, the 5 th of July, then the writ petition will be listed on or after the 9 th of July. 5. An urgent case filed for listing the next day will be accepted only if the Notice of Motion and the advance copy are personally served on the opposite counsel/party. 6. Ordinary listing will be a minimum of 7 clear days after removal of objections, if any. Consequently, if a writ petition is filed on, say, the 5 th of July for ordinary listing, then it will be listed on or after the 13 th of July. 7. Service of Notice of Motion and advance copy in compliance with these Practice Directions will be deemed to be adequate service for all purposes and no further notice shall be given to the opposite counsel. 8. When a Notice of Motion and advance copy are personally served on a Nominated Counsel, the office of such a Nominated Counsel will clearly acknowledge receipt by giving the date of receipt and a diarised receipt number. The office of the Nominated Counsel is expected to maintain a register/diary for this purpose.

9. The contents of these Practice Directions will apply, mutatis mutandis to the Original Jurisdiction and the Appellate Jurisdiction of this Court and for all miscellaneous applications in pending or decided cases in relation to Nominated Counsel of designated authorities. (Notices dated 18.7.1994 and 10.1.1995). The above Practice Directions will come into effect w.e.f. 1 st October, 2002. By Order Sd/- (Bharat Bhushan) Registrar General

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI : NEW DELHI NO. OF ANNEXURE A In the matter of: A.B.C....... Plaintiff/ Petitioner/ Appellant(s) versus D.E.F....... Defendant/ Respondent(s) NOTICE OF MOTION TAKE NOTICE that the accompanying petition/application will be listed before Court on 2002 at 10.30 O'Clock in the forenoon, or so soon thereafter as may be convenient to the Court. New Delhi Dated: (Name, Advocate) Address Computer Code No. To 1. (Name) Advocate for 2. (Name) Advocate for --------------- 3. (Name) Advocate for ---------------

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI : NEW DELHI NO. OF ANNEXURE B In the matter of: A.B.C....... Plaintiff/Petitioner/Appellant(s) versus D.E.F....... Defendant/Respondent(s) NOTICE OF MOTION Vide Notice of Motion dated 2002 in the aforesaid matter, you were intimated that the aforesaid matter would be listed on 2002. NOW TAKE NOTICE that the matter will be listed on 2002 at 10.30 O'Clock in the forenoon, or so soon thereafter as may be convenient to the Court. New Delhi Dated: (Name, Advocate) Address Computer Code No. To 1. (Name) Advocate for 2. (Name) Advocate for --------------- 3. (Name) Advocate for ---------------

HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI No. 31/Rules/DHC Dated : 16.01.2015 PRACTICE DIRECTIONS Hon ble the Chief Justice, on the recommendations of the Hon ble Judges of the Original Side, has been pleased to issue following practice directions for information and compliance by all concerned :- 1. In a Petition filed under Section 9 of the Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996, where the arbitration proceedings have commenced, an advance copy of petition shall be supplied to private parties and in all the petitions under Section 9 of the Act whether before, during or after passing of the award in cases where the opposite party is Union of India, State Government, Statutory Authority, Public Sector Undertaking or Govt. Department, advance copy shall be served through the respective standing/nominate/empanelled counsel. 2. In a petition filed under Section 11 of the Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996, for appointment of Arbitrators, an advance copy of petition shall be served upon the opposite party, where opposite party is Union of India, State Government, Statutory Authority, Public Sector Undertaking or Govt. Department through the respective standing/nominated counsel. 3. In a petition filed under Sections 14 & 15 of the Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996, for termination of mandate and substitution of the arbitrator, an advance copy of petition shall be served upon the opposite party or their counsel appearing in the arbitration proceedings. 4. In a petition filed under Section 27 of the Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996, for Court s assistance in taking evidence, an advance copy of petition shall be served upon the opposite party or their counsel appearing in the arbitration proceedings. 5. In a petition filed under Section 34 of the Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996, for setting aside arbitral award, an advance copy of petition shall be served upon the opposite party or their counsel who appeared last in the arbitral proceedings. 6. In an appeal filed under Section 37 of the Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996, an advance copy of petition shall be served upon the opposite party or their counsel appearing in the arbitral proceedings. In all such above matters, a letter will also be served on the other side stating that the matter will be listed in Court shortly. The acknowledgment of service will be enclosed with the petition at the time of filing.

All the Officers and Dealing Assistants at the Filing Counter are requested to ensure that advance copies in the above mentioned petitions filed under Sections 9, 11, 14, 15, 27, 34 and 37 of the Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996 are served upon the opposite parties and the acknowledgment of service is enclosed with the petitions at the time of their filing. These Practice Directions shall come into force immediately. By Order Sd/- (VINOD GOEL) REGISTRAR GENERAL