Case: 4:14-md RWS Doc. #: 164 Filed: 12/18/15 Page: 1 of 8 PageID #: 1284

Similar documents
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Case: 4:14-md RWS Doc. #: Filed: 12/09/15 Page: 2 of 105 PageID #: 1101

Case: 1:14-cv Document #: 58 Filed: 11/10/15 Page 1 of 10 PageID #:314

Case: 1:13-cv Document #: 52 Filed: 12/23/14 Page 1 of 9 PageID #:463

ORDER PRELIMINARILY APPROVING CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT, DIRECTING NOTICE, AND SCHEDULING FINAL APPROVAL HEARING

Case: 1:15-cv Document #: 169 Filed: 12/01/17 Page 1 of 7 PageID #:2786

Case 7:12-cv VB Document 109 Filed 08/01/14 Page 1 of 9

Case: 1:17-cv Document #: 88 Filed: 07/06/18 Page 1 of 14 PageID #:1135

Case: 1:14-cv Document #: 266 Filed: 10/05/17 Page 1 of 12 PageID #:5588

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA. ORDER This matter came before the Court on the Plaintiffs Motion for Modification of

Case 7:16-cv KMK Document 75 Filed 10/17/17 Page 1 of 11

SUSAN DOHERTY and DWIGHT SIMONSON, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, Civil Action No. l:10-cv nlh-kmw

Case: 1:13-cv Document #: 382 Filed: 03/08/18 Page 1 of 14 PageID #:7778

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case: 4:16-cv JAR Doc. #: 97 Filed: 12/13/18 Page: 1 of 10 PageID #: 2279

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

Case 4:10-cv YGR Document Filed 06/17/16 Page 1 of 11

\ 'C,_ \) ~THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS

Case: 4:16-cv ERW Doc. #: 95 Filed: 12/15/17 Page: 1 of 10 PageID #: 734

Case 2:17-cv JFB-SIL Document 16 Filed 07/14/17 Page 1 of 4 PageID #: 71

Case 2:08-cv SHM-dkv Document 327 Filed 06/23/14 Page 1 of 23 PageID 8969

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF JACKSON COUNTY, MISSOURI, AT INDEPENDENCE

Case 1:17-cv WGY Document 65 Filed 06/22/18 Page 1 of 11

Case 1:15-cv YK Document 84 Filed 05/31/18 Page 1 of 9 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Case 1:17-cv AT Document 77 Filed 09/14/18 Page 1 of 12

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

Case 5:05-cv RMW Document 97 Filed 08/08/2007 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION. Plaintiffs, Case No. 1:16-CV MHC

Case 3:13-cv BAS-RBB Document Filed 10/14/16 Page 1 of 8 EXHIBIT 8

Case: 1:12-cv Document #: 576 Filed: 07/06/17 Page 1 of 15 PageID #:22601

[PROPOSED] ORDER AND JUDGMENT GRANTING FINAL APPROVAL OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT AND DISMISSING CLAIMS

Case 1:17-cv MGC Document 107 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/28/2018 Page 1 of 21

Case: 4:14-cv ERW Doc. #: 74 Filed: 07/13/15 Page: 1 of 9 PageID #: 523. Case No.: 4:14-cv-00159

Case 1:06-md JG-VVP Document 2370 Filed 11/06/15 Page 1 of 6 PageID #:

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI WESTERN DIVISION

Case 3:12-cv SI Document 127 Filed 05/03/16 Page 1 of 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Case 3:17-cv M Document 64 Filed 11/22/17 Page 1 of 9 PageID 659

Case 2:17-cv GAM Document 56 Filed 03/23/18 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Plaintiff, Defendant. for Denbury Resources, Inc. ("Denbury" or "Defendant") shares pursuant to the merger of

Case 2:16-cv JMA-SIL Document 5 Filed 12/27/16 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 88 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

USDC SDNY DOCUMENT ELECTRONICALLY FILED DOC #: DATE FILED: //y/20/0

Case 1:14-cv VEC Document 259 Filed 01/24/17 Page 1 of 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. TJ H Case No. 5:15-cv ~jc~-gjs

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION

Case 1:11-md SM Document 242 Filed 01/02/19 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE (ALL CASES)

SUPERIOR COURT, STATE OF WASHINGTON, KITTITAS COUNTY

Case 1:15-cv ELR Document 60 Filed 09/08/16 Page 1 of 21

Case 2:16-cv RSL Document 84 Filed 03/23/18 Page 1 of 7

Case 2:14-cv RJS Document 67 Filed 11/03/16 Page 1 of 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF UTAH

Case3:14-cv MMC Document53 Filed06/26/15 Page1 of 10

Case 5:12-cv SOH Document 457 Filed 04/08/19 Page 1 of 9 PageID #: 12296

Case 3:09-cv JPG-PMF Document 47 Filed 01/11/11 Page 1 of 7 Page ID #466

Case 0:16-cv WPD Document 101 Entered on FLSD Docket 10/24/2017 Page 1 of 12

Your legal rights may be affected even if you do not act. Please read this Notice carefully. YOUR RIGHTS AND CHOICES

Follow this and additional works at:

Case: 1:12-cv Document #: 117 Filed: 08/12/14 Page 1 of 11 PageID #:706

Case 1:13-cv LGS Document 119 Filed 07/06/15 Page 1 of 8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

Currently before the Court for preliminary approval is a settlement (the

Case 1:12-cv JSR Document 63 Filed 11/12/14 Page 1 of 13

Case 3:13-cv TJC-MCR Document Filed 04/25/17 Page 2 of 111 PageID 4087 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION ORDER PRELIMINARILY APPROVING SETTLEMENT AND PROVIDING FOR NOTICE

Case 3:15-cv RBL Document 214 Filed 05/16/18 Page 1 of 8

Case 1:16-cv AOR Document 50-2 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/12/2017 Page 2 of 34

Case Case 1:10-cv AKH Document Document Filed 03/16/15 03/13/15 Page 11of9

Case: 1:15-cv Document #: 47 Filed: 10/11/16 Page 1 of 8 PageID #:299

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. Judge:

Case 3:14-cv PGS-LHG Document 130 Filed 05/14/18 Page 1 of 9 PageID: 4283

Case: 1:06-cv Document #: 771 Filed: 03/15/19 Page 1 of 9 PageID #:28511

Case: 1:17-md JSG Doc #: 145 Filed: 12/20/18 1 of 11. PageID #: 2830

Case 2:06-cv R-CW Document 437 Filed 10/12/12 Page 1 of 11 Page ID #:7705

Case 3:14-cv SI Document 240 Filed 11/21/17 Page 1 of 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF OREGON

Case 5:08-cv EJD Document Filed 02/23/17 Page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION

Case 9:14-cv WPD Document 251 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/10/2017 Page 1 of 16 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO. Plaintiff, j Judge: Hon. Joan M. Lewis ) ) )


Case 2:03-cv RCJ-PAL Document 2907 Filed 06/05/17 Page 1 of 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND RELEASE

Case 1:09-cv RB-RHS Document 139 Filed 11/01/13 Page 1 of 14 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO

SUPERIOR COURT, STATE OF WASHINGTON, SPOKANE COUNTY

GRANTED WITH MODIFICATIONS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Case 1:15-cv WHP Document 148 Filed 06/28/18 Page 1 of 14

Case 3:15-cv VAB Document 46 Filed 05/20/16 Page 1 of 52

Case: 5:14-cv JRA Doc #: 29 Filed: 01/28/15 1 of 6. PageID #: 284 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION

Notice of Pendency and Proposed Settlement of Class Action

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF PHELPS COUNTY, MISSOURI

SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF ALAMEDA

Case 4:10-cv YGR Document Filed 06/17/16 Page 8 of 156

Attorneys for BERKES CRANE ROBINSON & SEAL, LLP and the class of similarly situated persons SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

Case 1:15-cv JFK Document 114 Filed 11/05/18 Page 1 of 12 Case 1:15-cv JFK Document Filed 10/30/18 Page 2 of 13

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

PLAINTIFF S EXHIBIT 1

Case 1:14-cv SMG Document 68 Filed 09/19/17 Page 1 of 29 PageID #: 1270

Case 2:03-cv RCJ-PAL Document 2795 Filed 02/09/17 Page 1 of 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA

LOCAL RULES SUPERIOR COURT of CALIFORNIA, COUNTY of ORANGE DIVISION 3 CIVIL RULES

Case 2:14-cv JCC Document 98 Filed 11/24/15 Page 1 of 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE

Case 1:02-cv LJM-WTL Document 117 Filed 08/16/2005 Page 1 of 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA INDIANAPOLIS DIVISION

Transcription:

Case: 4:14-md-02562-RWS Doc. #: 164 Filed: 12/18/15 Page: 1 of 8 PageID #: 1284 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI EASTERN DIVISION IN RE: BLUE BUFFALO COMPANY, ) LTD. MARKETING AND SALES ) PRACTICES LITIGATION ) Case No. 4:14 MD 2562 RWS CONDITIONAL CLASS CERTIFICATION AND PRELIMINARY APPROVAL ORDER Alexia Keil, Nick Hutchison, Rachael D. Stone, Maja Mackenzie, Jonathan Fisher, David Delre, Beth Cox, Lori Canale, and Derek McCusker (collectively, Class Representatives or Plaintiffs ) on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated and Blue Buffalo Company, Ltd. ( Blue Buffalo or Defendant ) (collectively, the Parties ) have entered into a Stipulation of Settlement dated December 9, 2015 (the Settlement Agreement ) to resolve their disputes in the above-captioned litigation (the Action ) and Plaintiffs have filed a Motion for provisional certification of a settlement class, preliminary approval of settlement, approval of notice to the class and permission to disseminate notice, and leave to file a First Amended Consolidated Complaint (the Motion ). The Settlement Agreement and accompanying exhibits, Exhibit A to the Kamber Declaration, set forth the terms and conditions for a proposed settlement and dismissal of the Action. Defendant consents to Plaintiffs filing an Amended Consolidated Complaint; and the Parties further request an immediate stay of the Action. Having reviewed the Settlement Agreement, the Motion, and accompanying exhibits, the pleadings and other papers on file in this Action, and statements of counsel, the Court finds that

Case: 4:14-md-02562-RWS Doc. #: 164 Filed: 12/18/15 Page: 2 of 8 PageID #: 1285 the Motion should be GRANTED as modified 1 and that this Order should be entered. Terms and phrases used in this Order shall have the same meaning ascribed to them in the Settlement Agreement. NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT: 1. Plaintiffs are granted leave to file their First Amended Consolidated Complaint in the form attached as Exhibit B to the Kamber Declaration. 2. The Court conditionally certifies for settlement purposes only the following Settlement Class: All residents of the United States of America who, from May 7, 2008 through the Preliminary Approval Date, purchased any of the Blue Buffalo Products [listed on Ex. 1 to the Settlement Agreement]. Specifically excluded from the Settlement Class are the following: a) Released Persons; b) The Court and its personnel; c) All persons who have timely elected to exclude themselves from the Settlement, pursuant to the procedures set forth in Paragraph 5.4 of the Settlement Agreement who, thereupon, shall no longer be Settlement Class Members, shall not be bound by this Settlement Agreement or eligible to make a claim for any benefit under the terms of the Settlement Agreement. d) Class Counsel and Supporting Counsel. The Court reserves the right to determine, should the occasion arise, whether Plaintiffs proposed claims may be certified as a class action for purposes other than settlement, and Defendant hereby retains all rights to assert that Plaintiffs proposed claims may not be certified as a class action except for settlement purposes. 3. The Court appoints Class Counsel to act as Settlement Class Counsel. 1 See modifications in paragraphs 23, 25, and 26. 2

Case: 4:14-md-02562-RWS Doc. #: 164 Filed: 12/18/15 Page: 3 of 8 PageID #: 1286 4. The Court appoints Class Representatives as representatives of the Settlement Class. 5. The Court finds that the proposed Settlement is sufficiently fair, reasonable and adequate to warrant providing notice to the Settlement Class and preliminarily approves the Settlement. This determination permitting notice to the Settlement Class is not a final finding, but a determination that the proposed Settlement is preliminarily acceptable, that it should be submitted to Settlement Class Members, and that a Fairness Hearing should be held to finally consider the fairness, reasonableness, and adequacy of the proposed Settlement. 6. The Court appoints the Heffler Claims Group as Settlement Administrator in accordance with the provisions of Paragraph 1.23 of the Settlement Agreement. The Settlement Administrator shall comply with the contract between itself and Class Counsel, including the Performance Standards set out in Paragraph 4.6 of the Settlement Agreement. 7. The Court approves the Publication Notice, and directs that notice in substantially similar form be published and disseminated in accordance with the provisions of the Settlement Agreement. 8. The Court approves the Class Notice, and directs that notice in substantially similar form be published and disseminated in accordance with the provisions of the Settlement Agreement 9. The Court approves the Claim Form, and directs that the Claim Form be available in a substantially similar form through the Settlement Website or otherwise from the Settlement Administrator as provided in Paragraph 1.4 of the Settlement Agreement. 10. The Court approves the Media Plan, as described in the Finegan Declaration, and Orders its execution by the Settlement Administrator as supervised by Class Counsel. 3

Case: 4:14-md-02562-RWS Doc. #: 164 Filed: 12/18/15 Page: 4 of 8 PageID #: 1287 11. The Court approves creation of the Settlement Website, as defined in Section 1.28 of the Settlement Agreement, that shall include downloadable copies of the Stipulation of Settlement, Class Notice, this Order, all papers submitted for preliminary Approval and any other filed documents in this case that Class Counsel believes relevant to the notice and claims process. The Settlement Website shall be maintained in accordance with the provisions of Paragraphs 2.6 2.10 of the Settlement Agreement. 12. The Court finds that, taken together, the Publication Notice and Class Notice, along with the Settlement Website and Media Plan (the Class Notice or Settlement Class Notice Program ) (a) are the best practicable notice, (b) reasonably calculated, under the circumstances, to apprise Settlement Class Members of the pendency of the Action and of their right to object or to exclude themselves from the proposed settlement, (c) are reasonable and constitute due, adequate, and sufficient notice to all persons entitled to receive notice, and (d) meet all requirements of applicable law. 13. The Court orders the Settlement Administrator to file proof of publication of the Publication Notice and proof of maintenance of the Settlement Website at or before the Fairness Hearing. 14. The Court orders any Settlement Class Member who wishes to exclude himself or herself from the Settlement Class to submit an appropriate, timely request for exclusion, postmarked no later than 90 days after the Notice Date and that otherwise conforms with the requirements proscribed in the Notice, or as the Court may otherwise direct, to the Settlement Administrator at the address on the Notice. 15. The Court enjoins all Settlement Class Members unless and until they have timely excluded themselves from the Settlement Class from: (a) filing, commencing, prosecuting, 4

Case: 4:14-md-02562-RWS Doc. #: 164 Filed: 12/18/15 Page: 5 of 8 PageID #: 1288 intervening in or participating as plaintiff, claimant or class member in any other lawsuit or administrative, regulatory, arbitration or other proceeding in any jurisdiction based on, relating to or arising out of the claims and causes of action or the facts and circumstances giving rise to the Action; (b) filing, commencing or prosecuting a lawsuit or administrative, regulatory, arbitration or other proceeding as a class action on behalf of any Settlement Class Members who have not timely excluded themselves (including by seeking to amend a pending complaint to include class allegations or seeking class certification in a pending action), based on, relating to or arising out of the claims and causes of action or the facts and circumstances giving rise to the Action; and (c) attempting to effect exclusion, or Opt-Outs, of a class of individuals in any lawsuit or administrative, regulatory, arbitration or other proceeding based on, relating to or arising out of the claims and causes of action or the facts and circumstances giving rise to the Action. 16. The Court orders that any Settlement Class Member who does not submit a timely, written request for exclusion from the Settlement Class (i.e., become an Opt-Out) will be bound by all proceedings, orders and judgments in the Action, even if such Settlement Class Member has previously initiated or subsequently initiates individual litigation or other proceedings encompassed by the Settlement Agreement release. 17. The Court orders that each Settlement Class Member who is not an Opt-Out and who wishes to object to the fairness, reasonableness or adequacy of the Settlement Agreement or the proposed Settlement or to the Attorneys Fees and Expenses, must no later than 90 days after the Notice Date, or as the Court may otherwise direct, submit to the Settlement Administrator (who shall deliver to Class Counsel and Defense Counsel) a written notice of objection and/or request to be heard, signed by the Settlement Class Member, and containing all of the following information: 5

Case: 4:14-md-02562-RWS Doc. #: 164 Filed: 12/18/15 Page: 6 of 8 PageID #: 1289 a. The name, address, telephone number, and, if available, the email address of the person objecting, and if represented by counsel, of his/her counsel; b. Specifically and in writing, all objections and grounds; c. Whether he/she intends to appear at the Final Approval Hearing, either with or without counsel; d. A statement sufficient to establish his/her membership in the Settlement Class, including all information required by the Claim Form; and e. A detailed list of any other objections submitted by the Settlement Class Member, or his/her counsel, to any class actions submitted in any court in the United States, whether in state court or otherwise, in the previous five (5) years. If the Settlement Class Member or his/her counsel has not objected to any other class action settlement in any court in the United States in the previous five (5) years, he/she shall affirmatively state so in the written materials provided in connection with the Objection to this Settlement. Failure to follow such procedures may, in the Court s discretion, preclude the Settlement Class Member from appearing and/or be deemed a waiver of the objection. 18. Any response to an objection shall be filed with the Court no later than 7 days prior to the Fairness Hearing. 19. The Court orders that any attorney hired by a Settlement Class Member for the purpose of objecting to the Settlement or to the Attorneys Fees and Expenses will be at the Settlement Class Member s expense. 20. The Court orders that any attorney hired by a Settlement Class Member for the purpose of objecting to the proposed Settlement or to the Attorneys Fees and Expenses and who intends to make an appearance at the Fairness Hearing must provide to the Settlement Administrator (who shall deliver to Class Counsel and Defense Counsel) and must file with the Clerk of the Court a notice of intention to appear no later than 95 days after the Notice Date or as the Court may otherwise direct. 6

Case: 4:14-md-02562-RWS Doc. #: 164 Filed: 12/18/15 Page: 7 of 8 PageID #: 1290 21. The Court orders that any Settlement Class Member who files and serves a written objection and who intends to make an appearance at the Fairness Hearing must provide to the Settlement Administrator (who shall forward it to Class Counsel and Defense Counsel) and must file with the Clerk of the Court a notice of intention to appear no later than 95 days after the Notice Date or as the Court may otherwise direct. 22. The Court orders that the Settlement Administrator must promptly furnish Class Counsel and Defense Counsel with copies of any and all written requests for exclusion, notices of intention to appear or other communications that come into its possession. 23. The Court orders the Settlement Administrator to provide the Opt-Out List to Class Counsel, as provided in Paragraph 5.4 of the Settlement Agreement, no later than seven (7) calendar days prior to the final fairness hearing, which such list Class Counsel then shall file with the Court no later than five (5) calendar days prior to the hearing. The Settlement Administrator shall furnish a declaration attesting to the accuracy and completeness of the list. 24. Counsel for Defendant shall ensure that the Settlement Administrator (or other designee) provides proper notice of the proposed Settlement to all appropriate government officials, as provided in the Class Action Fairness Act. 25. The Court orders that a Fairness Hearing shall be held on Thursday, May 19, 2016 at 10:30 a.m. in Courtroom 16-South before the undersigned to consider the fairness, reasonableness, and adequacy of the proposed Settlement and whether it should be finally approved by the Court pursuant to a final approval order and judgment, at which time the Court also will address Class Counsel s application for attorneys fees and costs, and Incentive Awards for Class Representatives. 7

Case: 4:14-md-02562-RWS Doc. #: 164 Filed: 12/18/15 Page: 8 of 8 PageID #: 1291 26. Class Counsel and Defense Counsel shall file a proposed final Order approving the Settlement and Class Counsel s application and attorneys fees and costs, and Incentive Awards for Class Representatives, no later than seven (7) days before the Fairness Hearing. 27. All pretrial proceedings in the Action are stayed and suspended until further order of this Court. Dated this 18th day of December, 2015. RODNEY W. SIPPEL UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 8