IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT ~~"A"!tOl'T~'CTCOURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEX~eRQUE, New MI!XICO ORDER FOR DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE

Similar documents
) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) The United States Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (the "Commission" or

EEOC v. Brink's Incorporated

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO. ) Defendant. )

EEOC v. PVNF, L.L.C., d/b/a Chuck Daggett Motors and Big Valley Auto

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, Plaintiff, v. Monk's Inc., d/b/a International House of Pancakes, Defendant.

EEOC and Darmo et al. v. Pinnacle Nissan, Inc. et al.

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Tri-Spur Investment Company, Inc., dba Sbarro's Italian Eatery

EEOC v. JEC Enterprises, Inc., d/b/a McDonalds

EEOC, Christopher, Bhend, and Chamara v. National Education Association, National Education Association - Alaska

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA Equal Employment Opportunity ) Commission, ) Case No.: CV PHX-DAE

United States of America v. The City of Belen, New Mexico

EEOC v. RSG Forest Products Inc. dba Estacada Lumber Co.

EEOC v. Pacific Airport Services, Inc.,

EEOC v. Supreme Corporation and Supreme Northwest LLC

EEOC v. U-Haul International Inc.

EEOC v. Merrill Pine Ridge, LLC

EEOC v. Consolidated Stores, Inc. d/b/a Big Lots

Case 3:05-cv HTW-LRA Document 82 Filed 04/20/2007 Page 1 of 7

EEOC and Maria Torres v. The Restaurant Company dba Perkins

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, Plaintiff, v. Mint Julep Restaurant Operations, LLC d/b/a Cheddar's Casual Cafe, Defendant.

EEOC v. Jolet II, Inc., d/b/a Thompson Care Center

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Maharaja Hospitality Inc, d/b/a Quality Inn by Choice Hotels

EEOC v. Northwest Savings Bank

EEOC v. Stephens Institute d/b/a The Academy of Art College

IllY _ UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY ) CIVIL NO. COO-16S1 Z 10 COJ\.

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Bob Watson Chevrolet

EEOC v. Ealge Wings Industries, Inc.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NORTH DAKOTA ) ) ) ) INTRODUCTION

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission et al. v. Majesty Maintenance, Inc.

EEOC v. NEA-Alaska, Inc.

EEOC v. Hiten Hospitality L.L.C. d/b/a Family Motor Inn and Jay Kishan Hospitality, Inc. and Mike Patel

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Revolution Studios and Smile Productions, LLC

EEOC v. Mason County Forest Products, LLC

Case 1:11-cv NLH -AMD Document 61 Filed 01/24/13 Page 1 of 12 PageID #: 211 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

Case 5:07-cv VAP-JCR Document 11 Filed 06/14/2008 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA EASTERN DIVISION

Cornell University ILR School. Judge Karen E. Schreier

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT. FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLIll~ STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DIVISION CONSENT DECREE THE LITIGATION

EEOC v. Tropiano Transportation Services, Inc.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CONSENT DECREE

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission et al. v. Harbor Freight Tools USA, Inc., d/b/a Harbor Freight Tools

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Convergys Corporation

EEOC & Wolansky v. United Healthcare of Florida, Inc.

THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS. Plaintiff, Defendant. CONSENT DECREE

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA CIVIL ACTION NO Defendant. SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT INTRODUCTION

EEOC v. Original Hot Dog Shops, Inc. doing business as Original Hot Dog Shop, Food Gallery Original, Inc. doing business as Original Hot Dog Shop

SIERRA COLLEGE ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURE

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Betsy Ross Flag Girl, Inc. d/b/a Betsy Ross Flag Girl and Barjac Company

EEOC v. Applegate Holdings LLC

EEOC v. Dillard's, Inc

Case 1:16-cv CCB Document 98 Filed 06/28/16 06/23/16 Page 1 of 14 11

EEOC v. Alyeska Pipeline Service Co.

Case 2:03-cv BBD-sta Document 14 Filed 08/05/2004 Page 1 of 7

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Japanese Food Solutions Inc., d/b/a Minado Restaurant

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. American Seafoods Company

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI WESTERN DIVISION. Plaintiff, CV-W-2-ECF

EEOC, et al v Lafayette College, et al.,

UNITED STA1ES DISTRICT COURT EAS1ERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. Civil Action No. 06 CV 2697 (ARR)(RER) CONSENT DECREE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA ORLANDO DIVISION SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT

EEOC v. Fleming, Inc., d/b/a J. Edward's

EEOC v. Grimmway Enterprises, Inc., d/b/a Grimmway Farms; Esparza Enterprises, Inc.

EEOC & Rodriguez, et al. v. Dynamic Medical Services, Inc.

EEOC v. Altec Industries

EEOC. v. Fox News. Cornell University ILR School. Judge William H. Pauly

EEOC v. Mcdonald's Restaurants of California, Inc.

EEOC v. Parker Palm Springs Hotel

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN

Sexual harassment policy. (A) Statement of policy.

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, Plaintiff, v. Studley Products, Inc. and Wildwood Industries, Inc., Defendants.

EEOC v. Bice of Chicago, et al.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA. Plaintiff, Defendant. AMENDED COMPLAINT AND JURY TRIAL DEMAND NATURE OF ACTION

EEOC v. Lawry's Retaurants, Inc,, d/b/a Lawry's The Prime Rib, Five Crowns, and Tam O'Shanter Inn

U.S. EEOC v Promens USA, Inc. and Bonar Plastics, Inc.

US Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, Erika Morales, et al., v. ABM Industries Inc., et al.

EEOC & Aimee Boss and Morgan Hagedon v. Bodega Bars USA, LLC d/b/a Mosaic Restaurant

Discrimination and Harassment Complaints and Investigations Administrative Procedure (3435)

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, Sherree Salter, et al., v. The Shoe Show of Rocky Mount, Inc., Andre Jones

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Rochdale Village, Inc.

EEOC & Suzanne Whitty v. Mount Carmel, LLC, and Benedictine Health System, et al.

EEOC v. Moka Shoe Corporation

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, et al., v. White House Home for Adults

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA NATURE OF THE ACTION

CASE NO. 5:00-CV COMPLAINT IN INTERVENTION ON BEHALF OF JACKQULINE STOKES

EEOC & Mitchel, et al., v. Allied Aviation Services, Inc., Allied Aviation Fueling of Dallas, LP, Allied Aviation Fueling Company of Texas, Inc.

Case 3:06-cv JMM Document 140 Filed 06/12/09 Page 1 of 14

EEOC v. Baldwin Supply Co.

EEOC and Thornton, et al, v. University of Phoenix, Inc. and Apollo Group, Inc.

NO , Chapter 5 TALLAHASSEE, March 13, Human Resources UNLAWFUL HARASSMENT AND UNLAWFUL SEXUAL HARASSMENT

EEOC v. Hannon's Food Services of Jackson Inc (d/b/a Kentucky Fried Chicken)

EEOC v. Wal-Mart Stores d/b/a Sam s Club

Peralta Community College District Office of Employee Relations th Street, Oakland CA (510)

EEOC v. CMC Service of Chicago, LLC d/b/a Great Clips for Hair

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF IDAHO I. INTRODUCTION. 1. This action originated with a discrimination charge filed by Travis Woods

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, Plaintiff, v. Lutheran Social Services of Southern California, Defendant.

TOWNSHIP POLICY PROHIBITING SEXUAL HARASSMENT

United States Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, Plaintiff, v. Jetson Midwest Mailers, Inc., Defendant.

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, and Peter Servidio, Plaintiffs, v. Labranche & Co., Inc., Defendant.

Adopted: August 1996 Wheaton ISD #803 Policy 401

PROHIBITION OF HARASSMENT & DISCRIMINATION

G-19: Administrative Procedures Discrimination, Harassment, and Retaliation Prohibited

Transcription:

FILED IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT ~~"A"!tOl'T~'CTCOURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEX~eRQUE, New MI!XICO EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION, Plaintiff, And JANNA ROBERTS, Plaintiff-Intervenor v. LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION, d/b/a LOCKHEED MARTIN MISSION SYSTEMS, Defendant. MAY 2Q ZOOZ ~.1 btl:aa CV 01-815 WJ/KBM ORDER FOR DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE Pursuant to the stipulation of the parties, and good cause appearing, this Court finds that the parties have reached a settlement of this matter resolving the claims of the EEOC, Jeanette Wolfe and Janna Roberts against Lockheed Martin Corporation d/b/a Lockheed Martin Mission Systems arising out to the issues in this lawsuit. The terms of the settlement are set forth in the Settlement Agreement incorporated in this Order and attached as Exhibit A. The Settlement Agreement is binding and enforceable at law or in equity. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: 1. The Court shall retain jurisdiction over any action to enforce the Settlement Agreement for two years following entry of this Order; provided, however, that upon application of either party and good cause showing, in accordance with the terms of the Settlement Agreement attached hereto, the Court may extend the duration of its jurisdiction over any action to enforce compliance with the

Settlement Agreement. 2. This action is hereby dismissed with prejudice, each party to bear hers or its own costs and attorney's fees incurred in this action as of the date of the entry ofthis Order. fl, ORABLE WILLIAM P. JOHNSON c.--'. ITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE 2

Submitted by: MARY JO O'NEILL Acting Regional Attorney C. EMANUEL SMITH Supervisory Trial Attorney Equal Employment Opportunity Commission 3300 N. Central Ave., Suite 690 Phoenix, Arizona 85012 LORETTA MEDINA Senior Trial Attorney VERONICA A. MOLINA Trial Attorney Equal Employment Opportunity Commission Albuquerque District Office 505 Marquette NW, Suite 900 Albuquerque, New Mexico 87102-2189 (505 248-5231 Attorneys for Plaintiff ~roved by: U?~O~~ CAROL LISA SMITH Krehbiel, Bannerman & Williams 6400 Uptown Boulevard NE Suite 200 West Albuquerque, New Mexico 87110 (505 837-1900 y for Defendant P INGHAM At orney at Law 3902 A Central SE Albuquerque, New Mexico 87102 (505266-5304 Attorney for PlaintiffIntervenor, J anna Roberts 3

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION, Plaintiff, and Janna Roberts, Plaintiff-Intervenor v LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION, d/b/a LOCKHEED MARTIN MISSION SYSTEMS, Defendant. No. CV-Ol-8l5 WJIKBM SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT The United States Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (the "Commission" or "EEOC" filed this action ("lawsuit" against Lockheed Martin Corporation ("Defendant" d/b/a Lockheed Martin Mission Systems ("LMMS" to enforce Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. 2000e et seq. (Title VII and the Civil Right Act of 1991, 42 U.S. c., 1981 a. In the Complaint, the Commission alleged that current LMMS employee Janna Roberts and former LMMS employee Jeanette Wolfe were subjected to sexual harassment by their immediate supervisor, a former employee of Defendant, in violation of Title VII. It was also alleged that Ms. Wolfe was subjected to harassment based upon her gender and that she was forced to resign as a result of LMMS' failure to effectively remedy her environment. Defendant I EXHIBIT A

has denied the allegations contained in the Complaint and contends that the EEOC has no authority to bring the Lawsuit because of, inter alia, lack of standing, laches, and unclean hands. Charging Party Janna Roberts has intervened in this case. This Settlement Agreement does not constitute an admission of liability by the Defendant, nor an adjudication on the merits of the allegations of the Complaint in the lawsuit. CLAIMS RESOLVED I. This Settlement Agreement resolves all claims of the EEOC against the Defendant, its stockholders, predecessors, officials, officers, representatives, directors, agents, employees, parents, subsidiaries, affiliates, attorneys, and divisions, including but not limited to LOCKHEED MARTIN MISSION SYSTEMS, and all other persons and entities acting by, through, under, or in concert with any of them, for back pay, compensatory and punitive damages, interest, injunctive relief, attorneys' fees and costs arising out of the allegations in the lawsuit. 2. The EEOC agrees that it will not use Janna Roberts' Charge of discrimination, the lawsuit, or this Settlement Agreement as a basis to pursue future claims of discrimination against Defendant on behalf of any individual. 3. Within ten days of the entry of this Settlement Agreement, Defendant agrees to pay Janna Roberts the sum of $140,000.000 as compensatory damages and to pay Jeanette Wolfe the sum of $60,000.00 as compensatory damages, as well as to resolve the EEOC's claims for compensatory damages on their behalf. Defendant will make these payments directly to Ms. Roberts and her counsel and to Ms. Wolfe at her address via certified mail. Defendant will issue appropriate 1099s to each woman. Defendant makes no representation as to the propriety of the tax treatment to be given to such payments. Within ten days of issuance of the settlement funds 2

to these two women, Defendant shall submit a copy of the checks and any related correspondence to the Regional Attorney, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, Albuquerque District Office, 505 Marquette NW, Suite 900, Albuquerque, NM 87102-2189. LMMS' POLICIES AND PRACTICES 4. In consideration for the EEOC's release of claims contained in Paragraph I above, Defendant agrees to the following provisions to be applied and limited to Defendant's Albuquerque, New Mexico facility of Lockheed Martin Mission Systems ("LMMS-Albuquerque" for the duration of this Settlement Agreement: A. LMMS-Albuquerque reaffirms its compliance and agrees to continue to comply with Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. 2000e et seq. and the Civil Rights Act ofl991, 42 U.S.C. 198Ia. B LMMS-Abuquerque shall not take any action to discriminate against or retaliate against Janna Roberts or Jeanette Wolfe based on the opposition to any practice made an unlawful employment practice by Title VII, or based on the filing of a charge, or testimony, assistance or participation in any manner in an investigation, proceeding or hearing under Title VII. C. LMMS-Albuquerque shall not take any action to discriminate against or retaliate against any witness who testified, assisted, or participated in any manner in the lawsuit. D. LMMS-Albuquerque reaffirms and agrees that it shall enforce policies and practices that provide a work environment free from sex discrimination and gender discrimination, including policies and practices to prevent sexual harassment or gender harassment of its employees and other individuals, and 3

allows employees and other individuals to raise concerns or complaints about matters made unlawful by Title VII, whether alleged, perceived or actual without retaliation, such policies and practices to include the following: (I within ninety (90 days of the entry of this Settlement Agreement, to review its existing policies on sex or gender discrimination, including sexual harassment and gender harassment, and make any changes thereto that LMMS-Albuquerque deems necessary in order to assure that such policies comply with Title VII and foster an environment in which employees will be encouraged to complain about alleged sex or gender discrimination and sexual or gender-based harassment. (2 Any revised policy and procedure statements that are provided to employees will be designed to present easily understood, convenient, consistent, confidential, and reliable procedures for reporting incidents of sexual harassment, gender harassment, and retaliation in LMMS Albuquerque, and include the following: E. LMMS Human Resources Department shall designate a representative to serve as investigative officer for sexual harassment issues at LMMS-Albuquerque within thirty (30 days of the entry of this Settlement Agreement. F. Within thirty (30 days of the entry of this Settlement Agreement, LMMS shall also designate an appropriate individual who has executive supervisory and managerial responsibility over the above-designated investigative officer to supervise the investigative officer and/or serve as an alternate investigative officer. 4

G. Within thirty (30 days of the entry of this Settlement Agreemet and for the duration of this Agreement, the names, relevant responsibilities, work locations, and telephone numbers of the investigative officer and the supervisory investigative officer will routinely and continuously be posted and provided to all employees at LMMS-Albuquerque so that an employee at LMMS-Albuquerque seeking such name can enjoy anonymity and remain inconspicuous to other employees. H. For the duration of this Settlement Agreement, complaints of sexual harassment, gender harassment, or retaliation will be accepted in writing, orally, or anonymously and will be taken seriously and investigated promptly. (I Only those who have an immediate need to know, including the investigative officers, other LMMS executive officers, the alleged target of harassment or retaliation, the alleged harasser(s or retaliator(s and any witnesses, may be informed by LMMS of the identity of the complainant. (2 During an investigation of a sexual harassment or gender harassment complaint of an employee, the investigative officer(s shall endeavor to immediately identify and interview all known affected employees and potential witnesses to the alleged harassment. (3 All parties contacted in the course of an investigation will be advised that any retaliation or reprisal against an individual who is an alleged target of harassment or retaliation, who has made a complaint, or who has provided evidence in connection with a complaint will not be tolerated and could result in disciplinary action. 5

I. Each investigative officer has or will receive thorough training about sexual harassment and gender harassment and will have the responsibility for expeditiously investigating all complaints. This training shall be in addition to that provided to all employees under Paragraph M below. J. The investigative officer will recommend remedial measures, if appropriate, based upon the results of the investigation. LMMS-Albuquerque will promptly consider the investigative officer's recommendation and will determine and implement the appropriate remedial measures, if any, which it deems necessary and reasonable under the circumstances. K. The investigative officer will maintain a file on the original complaint(s and any follow-up investigation for the duration of this Settlement Agreement. 1. LMMS managers, officials, agents, or employees who engage III sexual harassment or retaliation, who fail to cooperate with company-sponsored investigations of sexual harassment or retaliation, or who refuse to implement remedial measures will be advised that they may be sanctioned severely by suspension or dismissal. M. LMMS-Albuquerque shall provide training for all LMMS-Albuquerque employees on sex discrimination, gender discrimination, sexual harassment, gender-based harassment, and retaliation as follows: (1 Two hours of training sessions annually for LMMS-Albuquerqueemployees shall be conducted during the term of this Settlement Agreement. All managers, supervisors and employees of LMMS Albuquerque shall attend the training. Duplicative sessions may be held 6

to accommodate staffing or facility needs. Employees who cannot personally attend an annual training session shall be required to view a videotape covering the topics described in Paragraph M (5 below. However, any LMMS-Albuquerque employee on approved leave at the time of such annual training session shall view such videotape within thirty (30 days of his or her return to the workplace. LMMS shall retain for the duration of this Settlement Agreement a registry of attendance and/or registry of video presentation attendance. LMMS-Albuquerque shall be responsible for all costs associated with this training. (2 The said training shall be conducted within four months of the entry of this Settlement Agreement. Additional training shall be conducted at least annually during the term of this Settlement Agreement. (3 The training described in this Paragraph M will be conducted by Maureen Liebler, LMMS Vice President for Human Resources in conjunction with Nettie Horne, LMMS Vice President and General Counsel, or their respective successors. (4 The training sessions agreed to by Paragraph M herein shall include two hours of instruction, to include time for questions and answers and the presentation described in Paragraph M (6 below. All personnel designated in Paragraph M above shall both register and attend the training. LMMS shall report in writing and in affidavit form to the Regional Attorney of the Commission's Albuquerque District Office at 505 Marquette NW, Suite 900, Albuquerque, New Mexico 87102-2189, 7

twice during the term of this Settlement Agreement that LMMS Albuquerque has met the terms of Paragraph M. (5 The training sessions agreed to in Paragraph M, at a minimum shall include the subjects of: what constitutes sex discrimination, including sexual harassment, harassment based on gender, and retaliation; that sex or gender discrimination in the hiring, firing, compensation, assignment or other terms, conditions or privileges of employment and retaliation violates Title VII; how to prevent sex or gender discrimination and retaliation; how to provide a work environment free from sex or gender discrimination, sexual harassment, gender harassment and retaliation; and to whom and by what means employees may complain if they feel they have been subjected to sex or gender-based discrimination, sexual harassment, gender harassment or retaliation in the workplace. (6 Included in the training sessions, Phil Shiver, or his successor as the On Site Program Manager at LMMS-Albuquerque shall speak to the employees about: (a potential discipline that can be taken against supervisors, managers and employees who commit acts of sex or gender discrimination, sexual harassment, gender harassment or retaliation or who allow sex or gender discrimination, sexual harassment, gender harassment or retaliation to occur in the workplace; (b the importance of maintaining an environment free of sex and gender discrimination, sexual harassment, gender harassment and retaliation; and (c the employer's 8

policies regarding sex and gender discrimination, sexual harassment, gender harassment and retaliation. N. For the duration of this Settlement Agreement, within thirty (30 days of hire, all new employees at LMMS-Albuquerque shall view a video tape of the training held pursuant to paragraph M and shall be given any written material disseminated at the training. O. LMMS-Albuquerque will provide the Commission through the duration of this Settlement Agreement any video taped presentations conducted pursuant to paragraph M or N. 5. Defendant reaffirms that Robert Wilhelm is no longer employed with Defendant and it will notify EEOC within ten (10 days of his rehire ifhe is ever rehired. REPORTS. INSPECTION AND POSTING 6. LMMS shall report in writing and in affidavit form to the Regional Attorney of the Commission's Albuquerque District Office at 505 Marquette NW, Suite 900, Albuquerque, New Mexico 87102-2189, twice during the term of this Settlement Agreement that LMMS Albuquerque has met the terms of this Agreement to include forwarding the video(s and registry of those persons attending training required by this Agreement; forwarding copies of any revisions to policies on sex or gender discrimination; reporting that LMMS policies on sex or gender discrimination have been distributed pursuant to this Agreement and the dates of such distribution; and that the posting of Exhibit A has been continuous for the reporting period. 7. The Commission retains its existing rights under federal anti-discrimination law and with reasonable notice, to enter and inspect the premises oflmms-albuquerque. 9

8. LMMS shall post within thirty (30 days of the entry of this Settlement Agreement and continuously for the duration of this Settlement Agreement, in prominent places frequented by employees in all LMMS Albuquerque, New Mexico facilities, the Notice attached to this Settlement Agreement as Exhibit A. This Notice shall be the same type, style and size as in Exhibit A. COSTS, FEES. FILING, AND DURATION OF AGREEMENT 9. Each party shall bear hers or its costs and attorneys' fees incurred as a result of the lawsuit through the filing of this Settlement Agreement and the entry of an Order of Dismissal of the lawsuit. A copy of this Settlement Agreement will be attached to the Order of Dismissal with Prejudice to be filed in this case. 10. This Settlement Agreement is enforceable for a period of two years from the date of entry of the Order of Dismissal. This Settlement Agreement shall expire by its own terms at the end of two years after the date of entry of the Order of Dismissal, without further action by the parties. II. In the event of an alleged breach of this Settlement Agreement, the parties agree that the U.S. District Court for the District of New Mexico retains jurisdiction of this action for the duration of this Agreement and that either party may seek compliance with this Agreement by petitioning the U.S. District Court for the District of New Mexico. In the event the Court determines that either party has failed to comply with this Agreement, the Court may order appropriate relief at law or in equity, including but not limited to, specific performance and extension of this agreement for such period as may be necessary to remedy the noncompliance. A COPY OF THIS SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT SHALL HAVE THE SAME FORCE AND EFFECT AS THE ORIGINAL. 10

APPROVED AND CONSENTED TO: GWENDOLYN YOUNG REAMS Associate General Counsel Litigation Management Services EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION 1801 L Street, NW Washington, D.C. 20507 ARY 10 O'NEILL Acting Regional Attorney I :EMANUEL SMITH ~ Supervisory Trial Attorney EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION Phoenix District Office 3300 North Central Avenue, Suite 690 Phoenix, Arizona 85012-9688 (602 640-5016 LORETTA MEDINA Senior Trial Attorney EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION Albuquerque District Office 505 Marquette NW, Suite 900 Albuquerque, New Mexico 87102-2189 (505 248-5230 Attorneys for Plaintiff 11

..." PAK~GHAM Attorney at Law 3902 #A, Central Avenue SE Albuquerque, NM 87102 266-5304 Attorney for Plaintiff-Intervenor CAROL LISA SMITH Krehbiel, Bannerman & Williams 6400 Uptown Boulevard NE Suite 200 West Albuquerque, New Mexico 87110 (505 837-1900 Attorney for Defendant 12

NOTICE TO ALL EMPLOYEES LOCKHEED MARTIN MISSION SYSTEMS-Albuquerque, N.M. It is unlawful under federal law (Title VII of the Civil Rights Act and state law to discriminate against an employee on the basis of sex in hiring, firing, compensation or other terms and conditions or privileges of employment, including sexual harassment. LMMS-Albuquerque Policy LMMS prohibits all forms of sex discrimination. including sexual harassment. Prohibited sexual harassment can include the following conduct: I. unwelcome touching of a sexual nature; 2. unwelcome discussion of sexual jokes and sexual behavior; 13. unwelcome requests for dates, sexual favors and propositions; 4. unwelcome actions or conduct that have the effect of creating an intimidating or hostile environment based on sex, such as blocking an individual's exit, entry or ability to freely move about in the workplace; and \S. distribution in the workplace of cartoons, pictures or drawings of a sexual nature. LMMS does not tolerate discrimination on the basis of sex or gender and will not retaliate against any employee who opposes a practice made unlawful under federal law, files, assists or participates in the filing of a charge of discrimination or participates in any investigation under Title VII, or who files a grievance alleging discrimination. If you believe you are being sexually harassed, discriminated against or retaliated against you must report this to your supervisor for resolution or to (fill in designated name, LMMS' designated investigative officer who may be contacted at (fill in designated name. I f you believe you have been discriminated against by LMMS you have the right to file a charge with the EEOC or the New Mexico Department of Labor. You also have the right to contact them at: I Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC, 505 Marquette N.W., Suite 900, Albuquerque, New Mexico 87102, (505 248-5201 or toll free at 1-800-669-4000; or, (2 The New Mexico Department of Labor, Human Rights Division ("HRD", 1596 Pacheco St., Suite 103, Santa Fe, New Mexico 87505, (505 827-6838. Exhibit A