Case 2:16-cv GMN-CWH Document 4 Filed 11/01/16 Page 1 of 6

Similar documents
Case 2:16-cv APG-CWH Document 1 Filed 09/12/16 Page 1 of 6

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION

Case 2:06-cv RSM Document 38 Filed 10/16/2007 Page 1 of 7

Case: 1:18-cv Document #: 24 Filed: 05/16/18 Page 1 of 11 PageID #:499

Case: 1:12-cv Document #: 27 Filed: 10/02/12 Page 1 of 5 PageID #:752

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION : : : : : : : : : :

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case 1:17-cv LY Document 1 Filed 03/17/17 Page 1 of 22 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE WESTERN DIVISION COMPLAINT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case 2:18-cv JAD-CWH Document 1 Filed 12/21/18 Page 1 of 17

Case 1:12-cv SAS Document 24-3 Filed 06/06/13 Page 1 of 13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Case 2:15-cv Document 1 Filed 04/14/15 Page 1 of 12 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION

Case 8:18-cv Document 1 Filed 08/07/18 Page 1 of 26 Page ID #:1

Case 2:12-cv JCM-VCF Document 1 Filed 11/13/12 Page 1 of 10

Case 2:17-cv EJF Document 2 Filed 10/02/17 Page 1 of 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF UTAH CENTRAL DIVISION

Case 2:15-cv Document 1 Filed 04/14/15 Page 1 of 7 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION

Case 2:14-cv MMM-AGR Document 17 Filed 08/04/14 Page 1 of 6 Page ID #:467 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Case 2:16-cv JNP Document 8 Filed 07/26/16 Page 1 of 5 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF UTAH

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Case 1:12-cv SAS Document 26 Filed 08/20/13 Page 1 of 13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SAN ANTONIO DIVISION

Case 1:18-cv Document 1 Filed 03/27/18 Page 1 of 12 PageID #: 1

Case 2:16-cv MMD-CWH Document 1 Filed 01/05/16 Page 1 of 5

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION COMPLAINT

AAPEX. Intellectual Property Policy Statement. Protecting Your Intellectual Property Rights at AAPEX

Case 1:14-cv RWZ Document 1 Filed 05/08/14 Page 1 of 19 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF UTAH, CENTRAL DIVISION : : : : : : : : : :

INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS POLICY

Case 1:11-cv REB Document 1 Filed 12/15/11 Page 1 of 5

Case 1:14-cv JMS-MJD Document 1 Filed 01/09/14 Page 1 of 8 PageID #: 1

Case 2:12-cv JAD-PAL Document 41 Filed 01/11/13 Page 1 of 13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

1 ORDER AND JUDGMENT CASE NO. CV JAK (MANX) Dockets.Justia.com

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION

Case 1:18-cv Document 1 Filed 01/29/18 Page 1 of 14

Case 1:16-cv GAO Document 1 Filed 07/29/16 Page 1 of 13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS COMPLAINT AND JURY DEMAND PARTIES

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SACRAMENTO DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA CHARLOTTE DIVISION Case No. 3:17-CV-292

Case 0:10-cv MJD-FLN Document 1 Filed 04/06/10 Page 1 of 14 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA. Court File No.

Case 2:15-cv Document 1 Filed 04/06/15 Page 1 of 14 Page ID #:1

Case 1:99-mc Document 417 Filed 05/23/12 Page 1 of 10 PageID #: IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

Attorneys for Plaintiffs NFL PROPERTIES LLC, PANTHERS FOOTBALL, LLC D/B/A CAROLINA PANTHERS, and PDB SPORTS, LTD. D/B/A DENVER BRONCOS FOOTBALL CLUB

Case: 1:12-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 10/02/12 Page 1 of 5 PageID #:1

Case 2:13-cv RJS Document 2 Filed 03/06/13 Page 1 of 16

Case 2:07-cv CM-JPO Document 1 Filed 07/30/2007 Page 1 of 12 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA ASHEVILLE DIVISION CIVIL ACTION NO.: 1:16-CV-165 ) ) ) ) ) ) )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA ASHEVILLE DIVISION CIVIL ACTION NO.: 1:16-CV-381 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case 3:14-cv RS-EMT Document 1 Filed 03/28/14 Page 1 of 11

Case 2:11-cv Document 1 Filed 11/23/11 Page 1 of 14 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case 1:18-cv Document 1 Filed 05/22/18 Page 1 of 14 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS COMPLAINT AND JURY DEMAND

Case: 1:17-cv Doc #: 1 Filed: 11/15/17 1 of 12. PageID #: 1

Case 2:16-cv Document 1 Filed 12/05/16 Page 1 of 5 PageID #: 1


Case: 5:17-cv SL Doc #: 1 Filed: 07/21/17 1 of 19. PageID #: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO. Case No.

Case 3:18-cv M Document 62 Filed 03/09/18 Page 1 of 10 PageID 1084

Case 1:18-cv LY Document 1 Filed 03/20/18 Page 1 of 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS AUSTIN DIVISION

Case: 1:18-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 06/08/18 Page 1 of 15 PageID #:1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE. No. Plaintiff, Defendants.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN MILWAUKEE DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

COMPLAINT FOR VIOLATIONS OF THE LANHAM ACT AND TRADEMARK INFRINGMENT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Hells Angels Motorcycle Corporation v. Alexander McQueen Trading Limited et al Doc. 1 Dockets.Justia.com

Case 1:18-mj KMW Document 7 Filed 04/13/18 Page 1 of 9

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION ) ) )

Case 2:18-cv DDC-TJJ Document 22 Filed 11/01/18 Page 1 of 10 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA JOHN JOSEPH BENGIS, an individual,

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) COMPLAINT (Jury Trial Demanded)

Case 2:17-cv Document 1 Filed 03/02/17 Page 1 of 21 PageID: 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION

Case 4:15-cv DLH-CSM Document 5 Filed 05/05/15 Page 1 of 11

Case: 1:16-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 02/12/16 Page 1 of 16 PageID #:1

NOTE: CHANGES HAVE BEEN MADE TO THIS DOCUMENT

Case 4:17-cv RP-SBJ Document 1 Filed 03/10/17 Page 1 of 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF IOWA CENTRAL DIVISION

GIBSON LOWRY BURRIS LLP

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION

Case 4:16-cv Document 1 Filed 10/18/16 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 1

Plaintiff Privacy Pop, LLC ( Plaintiff ) complains and alleges as follows against Defendant Gimme Gimme, LLC ( Defendant ).

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION COMPLAINT FOR INJUNCTIVE AND OTHER RELIEF INTRODUCTION

Damages and Remedies in Civil IP Cases An U.S. Perspective

Case 1:11-cv JRH -WLB Document 1 Filed 07/21/11 Page 1 of 6

Case3:15-cv DMR Document1 Filed09/16/15 Page1 of 11

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 1 COMPLAINT

Case: 1:16-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 03/07/16 Page 1 of 10 PageID #:1

Attorney for Plaintiff TIPSY ELVES LLC UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA WESTERN DIVISION

Case 1:15-cv EJF Document 2 Filed 09/25/15 Page 1 of 12

Case 3:17-cv JCH Document 1 Filed 11/13/17 Page 1 of 12 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT. Case No.

AGREED MOTION FOR ENTRY OF CONSENT JUDGMENT AND PERMANENT INJUNCTION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, WESTERN DIVISION. Case No. COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES, RESTITUTION AND INJUNCTIVE RELIEF

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI WESTERN DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Transcription:

Omix Ada, Inc. v. Changzhou Jiulong Auto Lamps Factory et al Doc. 0 Case :-cv-0-gmn-cwh Document Filed /0/ Page of West Sunset Road, Suite 00 Las Vegas, Nevada -0 0 0 DICKINSON WRIGHT PLLC JOHN L. KRIEGER Nevada Bar No. 0 Email: jkrieger@dickinson-wright.com JOEL Z. SCHWARZ Nevada Bar No. Email: jschwarz@dickinson-wright.com KENDAL L. WEISENMILLER Nevada Bar No. Email: kweisenmiller@dickinson-wright.com West Sunset Road, Suite 00 Las Vegas, Nevada -0 Tel: (0) 0-00 Fax: (0) - Attorneys for Plaintiff Omix-ADA, Inc. OMIX-ADA, INC., a Georgia Corporation, v. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT Plaintiff, CHANGZHOU JIULONG AUTO LAMPS FACTORY; GUANGZHOU VCAN ELECTRONIC TECHNOLOGY CO., LTD.; MAXGRAND, LTD.; SANMAK LIGHTING CO., LTD.; SHENZHEN UNISUN TECHNOLOGY CO., LTD.; and UNITY WD ACCESSORIES CO., LTD., DISTRICT OF NEVADA Defendants. CASE NO. DEPT. :-cv- TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER AND SEIZURE ORDER Plaintiff OMIX-ADA, INC. ( Omix or Plaintiff ) has moved ex parte for a Temporary Restraining Order, Seizure Order and a Preliminary Injunction, pursuant to the Patent Act, U.S.C. ; Federal Rules of Civil Procedure ( FRCP ) and ; and Local Rule ( LR ) -. Omix alleges Changzhou Jiulong Auto Lamps Factory ( Changzhou Jiulong ); Guangzhou Vcan Electronic Technology Co., Ltd. ( Guangzho Vcan ); Maxgrand, Ltd. ( Maxgrand ); Sanmak Lighting Co., Ltd. ( Sanmak ); Shenzhen Unisun Technology Co., Ltd. Dockets.Justia.com

Case :-cv-0-gmn-cwh Document Filed /0/ Page of West Sunset Road, Suite 00 Las Vegas, Nevada -0 0 0 ( Unisun ) and Unity WD Accessories Co., LTD. ( Unity, and together with Changzhou Jiulong, Guangzhou Vcan, Maxgrand, Sanmak and Unisun, the Defendants ) have made, imported into the United States, sold, offered to sell, distributed, promoted, and/or advertised at the SEMA Show ( SEMA ) held on November -, 0 at the Las Vegas Convention Center and the Automotive Aftermarket Products Expo ( AAPEX ) held on November -, 0 at the Sands Expo, products that infringe U.S. Patent Nos. US,,0 B (the 0 Patent ) entitled Auxiliary Light Mount Assembly for Tubular Bumpers, US D,0 S (the 0 Patent ) entitled Hood Latch, and US D, S (the Patent and, collectively with the 0 Patent, the Omix Patents ) entitled Front Grille for a Vehicle, and the RUGGED RIDGE trademarks owned by Omix, Registration No.,, and,,0. The Court, having duly considered Omix s Complaint, Emergency Ex Parte Motion And Supporting Memorandum For Entry Of A Temporary Restraining Order, Seizure Order And Preliminary Injunction, and the declarations and exhibits submitted therewith, hereby makes the following findings and conclusions:. Omix is likely to succeed on the merits of its patent infringement claims. Omix is likely to succeed in showing that the 0 Patent is owned by Omix, is valid and enforceable, and that Defendants Guangzhou Vcan Electronic Technology Co., Ltd. ( Guangzho Vcan ); Sanmak Lighting Co., Ltd ( Sanmak ); Shenzhen Unisun Technology Co., Ltd. ( Unisun ), and Unity WD Accessories Co., Ltd. ( Unity and, collectively with Guangzho Vcan, Sanmark and Unison, the 0 Defendants ) have imported into the United States, sold, offered to sell, distributed, promoted, and/or advertised auxiliary light mount assemblies for tubular bumpers that infringe on the 0 Patent (the 0 Infringing Products ). At AAPEX, the 0 Defendants have identified their 0 Infringing Products by the following SKU numbers: Defendant Guangzhou Vcan SKU V-W, and Defendant Unisun SKU UT-B0. Omix is likely to succeed in showing that the 0 patent is owned by Omix, is valid and enforceable, and that Defendant Unity has imported into the United States, sold, offered to sell, distributed, promoted, and/or advertised hood latches that infringe on the 0 Patent (the 0 Infringing Produts ).

Case :-cv-0-gmn-cwh Document Filed /0/ Page of West Sunset Road, Suite 00 Las Vegas, Nevada -0 0 0 Omix is likely to succeed in showing that the Patent is owned by Omix, is valid and enforceable, and that Changzhou Jiulong Auto Lamps Factory ( Changzhou Jiulong ); Maxgrand, LTD. ( Maxgrand ) and Unity (together with Changzhou Jiulong and Maxgrand, the Defendants ) have imported into the United States, sold, offered to sell, distributed, promoted, and/or advertised front grilles that infringe on the Patent (the Infringing Products ). Omix is likely to succeed in showing that Defendant Unity is intentionally using a mark that is identical or nearly identical to Omix s RUGGED RIDGE mark for the same goods that Omix s federally-registered trademarks protect and that confusion is inevitable.. It appears to the Court that Defendants are China-based manufacturers of aftermarket auto care parts and automotive specialty products that, with the exception of their temporary presence in Las Vegas during the AAPEX and/or SEMA tradeshows, do not have a regular place of business or assets in the United States. Defendants have imported into the United States, sold and/or offered to sell the 0 Infringing Products, the 0 Infringing Products, and Infringing Products, respectively, at the AAPEX and/or SEMA tradeshows and will then promptly leave the United States.. Absent an ex parte temporary restraining order and seizure order, Defendants importation, sale and/or offers to sell the 0 Infringing Products, 0 Infringing Products, and the Infringing Products will result in immediate and irreparable injury to Omix in the form of loss of control over its valuable intellectual property rights, loss of consumer goodwill, and interference with Omix s ability to exploit the Omix Patents. Further, because Defendants have no presence in the United States, it may be difficult or impossible for Omix to recover a money judgment against any of the Defendants.. The harm to Omix in denying the requested temporary restraining order and seizure order outweighs the harm to the legitimate interests of Defendants from granting such relief.. The public interest weighs in favor of granting Omix the requested temporary restraining order and seizure order.

Case :-cv-0-gmn-cwh Document Filed /0/ Page of West Sunset Road, Suite 00 Las Vegas, Nevada -0 0 0. The 0 Infringing Products, 0 Infringing Products, and Infringing Products and materials evidencing Defendants infringements alleged in the Complaint are in Defendants possession at the AAPEX and/or SEMA tradeshows currently taking place in Las Vegas, Nevada, but these materials would likely be destroyed, moved, hidden or otherwise made inaccessible to the Court if Omix were to proceed on notice to Defendants. TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that, pending a decision by the Court on Omix s application for a preliminary injunction, the 0 Defendants and their officers, agents, servants, employees and attorneys, and all other persons acting in active concert or participation with any of them, are hereby immediately, temporarily restrained from infringing the 0 Patent at the AAPEX tradeshow in Las Vegas, Nevada from November -, 0, and the SEMA tradeshow in Las Vegas, Nevada from November -, 0. Specifically, the 0 Defendants are hereby temporarily restrained from making, using, selling, offering to sell, and importing into the United States footwear designs covered by U.S. Patent No. US,,0 B and colorable imitations thereof. In addition, the 0 Defendants are hereby temporarily restrained from transferring, moving, returning, destroying or otherwise disposing of any 0 Infringing Products except pursuant to the below Seizure Order. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pending a decision by the Court on Omix s application for a preliminary injunction, the Defendants and their officers, agents, servants, employees and attorneys, and all other persons acting in active concert or participation with any of them, are hereby immediately, temporarily restrained from infringing the Patent at the AAPEX tradeshow in Las Vegas, Nevada from November -, 0, and the SEMA tradeshow in Las Vegas, Nevada from November -, 0. Specifically, the Defendants are hereby temporarily restrained from making, using, selling, offering to sell, and importing into the United States footwear designs covered by U.S. Patent No. US D, S and colorable imitations thereof. In addition, the Defendants are hereby temporarily restrained from transferring, moving, returning, destroying or otherwise disposing of any Infringing Products except pursuant to the below Seizure Order.

Case :-cv-0-gmn-cwh Document Filed /0/ Page of West Sunset Road, Suite 00 Las Vegas, Nevada -0 0 0 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pending a decision by the Court on Omix s application for a preliminary injunction, Defendant Unity and its officers, agents, servants, employees and attorneys, and all other persons acting in active concert or participation with any of them, are hereby immediately, temporarily restrained from infringing the 0 Patent at the SEMA tradeshow in Las Vegas, Nevada from November -, 0. Specifically, Defendant Unity is hereby temporarily restrained from making, using, selling, offering to sell, and importing into the United States footwear designs covered by U.S. Patent No. US D,0 S and colorable imitations thereof. In addition, Defendant Unity is hereby temporarily restrained from transferring, moving, returning, destroying or otherwise disposing of any 0 Infringing Products except pursuant to the below Seizure Order. SEIZURE ORDER IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendants 0 Infringing Products, 0 Infringing Products, and Infringing Products, records (including computers and electronic evidence) of Defendants sales and offers to sell infringing products, and Defendants promotional display(s), sales equipment, materials used to facilitate Defendants infringements, catalogues and other marketing materials, and tooling (collectively, Materials ) shall be seized by the United States Marshals Service, assisted by one or more attorneys or representatives of Omix, at the booths rented or occupied by Defendants at the AAPEX tradeshow in Las Vegas, Nevada from November -, 0, and the SEMA tradeshow in Las Vegas, Nevada from November -, 0. The 0 Infringing Products, 0 Infringing Products, and Infringing Products that the United States Marshals shall seize include SKU numbers SKU V-W and SKU UT-B0. If Omix identifies more infringing products, they can petition the Court to amend this Order. The Defendants shall destroy their inventory of Materials at Omix s election. The United States Marshals Service may use all reasonable force in conducting the seizure and may open doors, locks, boxes, brief cases, and containers of any type or nature to locate and identify Materials to be seized. Attorneys and other representatives of Omix shall accompany the United States Marshals Service during the seizure to identify the Materials to be seized. Omix s counsel shall itemize and take possession of the seized Materials, provide a copy

Case :-cv-0-gmn-cwh Document Filed /0/ Page of West Sunset Road, Suite 00 Las Vegas, Nevada -0 0 0 of the inventory to the United States Marshals Service, and file the inventory with the Court. In addition, Omix s counsel may record the contents of Defendants booth and Materials by photographic and/or videographic means during the seizure action. The United States Marshals Service shall not retain custody of seized Materials. Omix agrees to indemnify the United States Marshals Service and hold it harmless from any suit, claim, cause of action, damage, loss, or injury arising from the execution of the seizure described in this Order. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the U.S. Customs and Border Protection seize any 0 Infringing Products, 0 Infringing Products, and Infringing Products coming into the United States. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this Order and the Summons and Complaint must be served upon Defendants, if found, at the time of the seizure, and by other means reasonably calculated to give Defendants notice of this action. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, Omix shall deposit $0,000.00 with the Clerk of the Court as security for this order. To the extent Defendants believe that additional security is necessary pursuant to Rule (c), Fed. R. Civ. P., Defendants shall file an application to the Court and provide notice to counsel for Omix by :00 p.m. on Monday, November, 0. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that a preliminary injunction hearing is set for Thursday, November 0, 0, at :0 a.m., in Courtroom D, before the Honorable Gloria M. Navarro, United States District Judge. Defendants shall file and serve any opposition to Omix s motion for a preliminary injunction on or before :00 p.m. on Tuesday, November, 0. SIGNED AND ENTERED this day of November, 0. UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE