NO. V. AT LAW NO. 1. Defendant(s). ELLIS COUNTY, TEXAS. FINAL PRETRIAL SUBMISSION [Required For Bench Trials over two (2) hours]

Similar documents
NO. V. AT LAW NO. 1. Defendant(s). ELLIS COUNTY, TEXAS. FINAL PRETRIAL SUBMISSION (CPS Trial)

IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF LUZERNE COUNTY

Third, it should provide for the orderly admission of evidence.

IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS BELMONT COUNTY, OHIO. : Plaintiff : vs. : FINAL PRETRIAL ORDER : Case No. Defendant :

CASE NUMBER: DIV 71. It appearing that this case is at issue and can be set for trial, it is ORDERED as follows:

Judicial Practice Preferences Circuit Civil/Section 11

STATE OF MICHIGAN IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR THE COUNTY OF JACKSON BUSINESS COURT DIVISION. via telephone (check one) /

Case 3:16-cv CRS-CHL Document 36 Filed 06/29/17 Page 1 of 5 PageID #: 423

Case 9:01-cv MHS-KFG Document 72 Filed 08/16/16 Page 1 of 10 PageID #: 1935

THE HONORABLE MEL DICKSTEIN FOURTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT PRACTICE POINTERS & PREFERENCES

Case 2:05-cv TJW Document 211 Filed 12/21/2005 Page 1 of 11

vs. OF TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS DISCOVERY AND DOCKET CONTROL PLAN FOR LEVEL 3 CASE ( PLAN )

MONTANA UNIFORM DISTRICT COURT RULES

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF JOHNSON COUNTY, KANSAS CIVIL COURT DEPARTMENT

LOCAL RULES OF THE DISTRICT COURT. [Adapted from the Local Rules for the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Indiana]

GENERAL ORDER FOR LUCAS COUNTY ASBESTOS LITIGATION. damages for alleged exposure to asbestos or asbestos-containing products; that many of the

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION

Case 1:11-cv MGC Document 14 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/17/2011 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

FORM 4. RULE 26(f) REPORT (PATENT CASES) UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA

SUPREME COURT - NASSAU COUNTY - IAS PART 56 PART RULES & PROCEDURES

Streamlined Arbitration Rules and Procedures

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE THIRTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY, FLORIDA GENERAL CIVIL DIVISION

RULES OF THE TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT OF LABOR AND WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT CHAPTER MEDIATION AND HEARING PROCEDURES TABLE OF CONTENTS

Judicial Assistant s > ALWAYS copy opposing counsel(s) on correspondence to the Court

Case 6:01-cv MV-WPL Document Filed 01/12/16 Page 1 of 9 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO

PRE-TRIAL PROCEDURES & PROTOCOL FOR JURY TRIALS & REFERRAL TO MEDIATION Revised March 2, 2018 (to correct web link only)

ORDER SETTING TRIAL AND DIRECTING PRE-TRIAL PROCEDURE. It appearing that this case is at issue and can be set for trial, it is ORDERED as follows:

UNIFORM ORDER SETTING CASE FOR JURY TRIAL AND PRE-TRIAL CONFERENCE AND REQUIRING PRE-TRIAL MATTERS TO BE COMPLETED

INDIVIDUAL PRACTICES OF JUDGE LOUIS L. STANTON

TEXAS DISCOVERY. Brock C. Akers CHAPTER 1 LAW REVISIONS TO TEXAS RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE GOVERNING DISCOVERY

Cislo & Thomas LLP Litigation Cost Control (LCC ) Stages of Litigation and Expected Fees and Costs

2:15-cr VAR-MKM Doc # 10 Filed 09/24/15 Pg 1 of 5 Pg ID 24 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION (ADR) PROCEDURES

STATE OF VERMONT VERMONT SUPREME COURT TERM, Order Promulgating Amendments to Rules 16.2 and 26 of the Vermont Rules of Civil Procedure

being preempted by the court's criminal calendar.

Honorable Judge Thomas Ramsberger 545 First Avenue North, Room 200 St. Petersburg, FL JURY TRIAL WEEKS * ALL ONE (1) WEEK DOCKETS *

These rules shall be known as the Local Rules for Columbia and Montour Counties, the 26 th Judicial District, and shall be cited as L.R. No.

IN THE UNITED STATE DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO. No. CV JH/DJS NOTICE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA IN RE: KATRINA CANAL BREACHES CONSOLIDATED LITIGATION NO.

Qualifications, Presentation and Challenges to Expert Testimony - Daubert (i.e. is a DFPS caseworker an expert)

HONORABLE KEITH MEYER 315 COURT STREET, ROOM 468 CLEARWATER, FL Judicial Practice Preferences Circuit Civil

UNIFORM ORDER SETTING CASE FOR JURY TRIAL; PRE-TRIAL CONFERENCE AND REQUIRING PRETRIAL MATTERS TO BE COMPLETED

IN THE GENERAL COURT OF JUSTICE DISTRICT COURT DIVISION., ) Plaintiff, ) ) CONSENT STIPULATIONS FOR v. ) ARBITRATION PROCEDURES ), ) Defendant.

COURT RULES OF THE HONORABLE RICHARD MOTT, J.S.C. 401 Union Street Columbia County Courthouse (Temporary)

1. TRCP 194 created a new discovery tool entitled Requests for Disclosure.

FOR THE NINTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT COURT IN AND FOR ORANGE COUNTY, FLORIDA

PLANT ASBESTOS SETTLEMENT TRUST ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION (ADR) PROCEDURES

CASE NUMBER: UNIFORM ORDER SETTING CASE FOR JURY TRIAL; PRE-TRIAL CONFERENCE AND REQUIRING PRETRIAL MATTERS TO BE COMPLETED

ADR CODE OF PROCEDURE

INDIVIDUAL PRACTICES OF JUDGE DEBORAH A. BATTS

COMPREHENSIVE JAMS COMPREHENSIVE ARBITRATION RULES & PROCEDURES

TITLE 23: EDUCATION AND CULTURAL RESOURCES SUBTITLE A: EDUCATION CHAPTER I: STATE BOARD OF EDUCATION SUBCHAPTER n: DISPUTE RESOLUTION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. Plaintiffs,

ARBITRATION RULES. Arbitration Rules Archive. 1. Agreement of Parties

PART RULES HONORABLE MARIA G. ROSA New York State Supreme Court Dutchess County Supreme Court 10 Market Street Poughkeepsie, New York 12601

RULES OF SUPREME COURT OF VIRGINIA PART ONE RULES APPLICABLE TO ALL PROCEEDINGS

APG ASBESTOS TRUST. 1. A copy of these ADR Procedures; 2. Form Affidavit of Completeness; 3. Election Form and Agreement for Binding Arbitration; and

LOCAL RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE FOR THE SUPERIOR COURTS OF JUDICIAL DISTRICT 16B

LOCAL SMITH COUNTY RULES OF CIVIL TRIAL JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURTS AND COUNTY COURTS AT LAW SMITH COUNTY, TEXAS

PREPARING FOR TRIAL. 3. Opponent s experts identified, complete Rule 26 responses received and, if possible and necessary, experts have been deposed.

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE TWENTIETH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA CIVIL ACTION (JUDGE HAYES)

AMERICAN ARBITRATION ASSOCIATION

CASE NO: FORECLOSURE SCHEDULING ORDER. 1. Any prior order referring this case to Senior Judge Sandra Taylor is hereby VACATED.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE SIXTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA IN AND FOR PASCO COUNTY CIVIL DIVISION. Case No. 51-

RULES OF PROCEDURE FOR PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE HEARING EXAMINER OF THE CITY OF PUYALLUP, WASHINGTON CHAPTER I: HEARINGS ON PERMIT APPLICATIONS

TITLE 2 PROCEDURAL RULE BOARD OF ARCHITECTS SERIES 2 DISCIPLINARY AND COMPLAINT PROCEDURES FOR ARCHITECTS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA STANDING ORDER FOR CIVIL JURY TRIALS BEFORE DISTRICT JUDGE JON S.

9:30 a.m. MOTION CALL, CASE MANAGEMENT, STATUS DATES 10:00 a.m. 2:30 p.m. MATTERS SET BY THE COURT

SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF ORANGE. JUDGE MELISSA R. McCORMICK DEPARTMENT C13. CLERK: Alma Bovard COURT ATTENDANT: As Assigned

Rule 26. General Provisions Governing Discovery; Duty of Disclosure [ Proposed Amendment ]

Case: 5:14-cv JRA Doc #: 29 Filed: 01/28/15 1 of 6. PageID #: 284 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION

ADAMS COUNTY COURT OF COMMON PLEAS RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE BUSINESS OF COURTS

Federal Rules of Civil Procedure

DISCOVERY- LOCAL RULES JUSTICE COURTS OF TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS

Montgomery County. a. Child Counsel Appointment Policies and Procedures. b. Standard Appointment Order

COMPLEX BUSINESS LITIGATION DIVISION PROCEDURES FOR THE THIRTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT COURT, IN AND FOR HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY, FLORIDA

19 th Judicial Circuit Court Judge Janet Croom Guidelines and Procedures. Circuit Civil Jury Division (Updated: September, 2017)

RULES OF PROCEDURE BEFORE THE COWLITZ COUNTY HEARINGS EXAMINER

PART THREE CIVIL CASES

Case 2:16-cv JAK-AS Document 29 Filed 10/15/16 Page 1 of 14 Page ID #:190

AAA Commercial Arbitration Rules and Mediation Procedures (Including Procedures for Large, Complex, Commercial Disputes)

REVISED AS OF MARCH 2014

Case 5:16-cv CAR Document 19 Filed 05/25/17 Page 1 of 5 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF GEORGIA MACON DIVISION

NORTH AMERICAN REFRACTORIES COMPANY ASBESTOS PERSONAL INJURY SETTLEMENT TRUST

Tennessee Department of Labor and Workforce Development Bureau of Workers' Compensation

INDIVIDUAL RULES AND PROCEDURES FOR CIVIL CASES. Lorna G. Schofield United States District Judge

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI CENTRAL DIVISION

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF JACKSON COUNTY, MISSOURI AT KANSAS CITY CIVIL CASE MANAGEMENT SCHEDULING ORDER

Department 16 has prepared this document to assist counsel in scheduling motions and reporters in Department 16.

CALENDAR Q. JUDGE PATRICK J. SHERLOCK 2007 RICHARD J. DALEY CENTER CHICAGO, ILLINOIS fax

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE TWENTIETH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PRETRIAL CONFERENCE ORDER (JURY TRIAL) for Plaintiff.

Pennsylvania Code Rules Rule and

Chapter 5 DISCOVERY. 5.1 Vocabulary Introduction and Discovery Deadlines Chart The Deposition 6

GUIDE TO DISCIPLINARY HEARING PROCEDURES

COURT OF COMMON PLEAS CLERMONT COUNTY, OHIO

ARBITRATION RULES FOR THE TRANSPORTATION ADR COUNCIL

ADMINISTRATIVE RULES FOR CONTESTED CASE HEARINGS MUNICIPAL EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYSTEM OF MICHIGAN. Effective June 1, 2016 Amended June 19, 2017

SUPREME COURT OF COLORADO

Consolidated Arbitration Rules

Transcription:

NO. IN THE COUNTY COURT Plaintiff(s), V. AT LAW NO. 1 Defendant(s). ELLIS COUNTY, TEXAS FINAL PRETRIAL SUBMISSION [Required For Bench Trials over two (2) hours] This Final Pretrial Submission must be filed no later than seven (7) days before the Final Pretrial Conference and all objections to witnesses and exhibits must be made and delivered to opposing counsel no later than four (4) days before the Final Pretrial Conference. Lead counsel must attend the Final Pretrial Conference; the clients are not required to attend. Failure by a party to timely file their Final Pretrial Submission, where another party has timely filed their Final Pretrial Submission, may result in the complete or partial postponement of the Final Pretrial Conference and the award of attorney s fees for the continued hearing against the non-compliant party and/or attorney. The trial setting will be removed if all parties fail to file timely Final Pretrial Submissions. The Agreed Factual Stipulations, Witness Lists and Exhibit Lists should be emailed to the Court Coordinator (ccl1coordinator@co.ellis.tx.us) in Microsoft Word format concurrently with the filing of the hard copy submissions. This Final Pretrial Submission is prepared and submitted by: ATTACHED HERETO ARE THE FOLLOWING, TO WIT: 1. Contentions of the party are set forth in Exhibit A. 2. Contested issues of fact and law are set forth in Exhibit B. (One page or less per issue) 3. Agreed factual stipulations are set forth in Exhibit C. Final Pretrial Submission 1

Only mutually agreed stipulations should be listed. This is not intended as a place to list a party s proposed stipulations. The Court expects the parties to confer, agree upon and list the uncontested facts as mutually agreed factual stipulations. It is the obligation of the Attorney in Charge for Plaintiff(s) to make a reasonable effort to initiate the conference and the obligation of the counsel for every other party to make a reasonable effort to comply with the Plaintiff s counsel s efforts. 4. Prior rulings of this Court as to the facts and laws believed to be relevant to the trial are set forth in Exhibit D. 5. Lists of fact witnesses are set forth in Exhibit E along with the subject matter of the testimony of each such witness. Included are all rebuttal and impeachment witnesses whose testimony can reasonably be anticipated at this time....the Court utilizes the provisions of Rule 103 Tex.R.Evid to rule on the legal admissibility of all lay witness testimony. The attorneys must present all reasonably anticipated evidentiary objections concerning lay testimony to the Court during the final pretrial conference or objection is waived. After receipt of opponent s Final Pretrial Submission, the Parties must confer in an attempt to resolve all objections concerning fact witnesses. All objections not resolved by agreement must be presented in writing and called to the attention of the Court for ruling at the final pretrial conference. All objections not timely presented and all objections for which a specific ruling is not timely obtained are waived. If the opinion of a lay witness complies with the requirements of Rule 701, Texas Rules of Evidence, it is sufficient to list such a witness in this exhibit as a fact witness rather than in the list of expert witnesses. If there is doubt as to whether such testimony may be expert testimony and possibly does not comply with the requirements of Rule 701, the witness must be listed as both a fact witness with the subject matter of the witness testimony and as an expert witness along with a report containing the information required of an expert witness. If a party intends to opine concerning values of his/her property, the existing law deems such testimony to be expert testimony that is permitted by court decisions. In order to avoid surprise, this Court requires that such party be listed as an expert witness and that a report of the opinions and other information required of expert witnesses be furnished to the opponent. 6. Names, addresses, telephone numbers and qualifications of expert witnesses are set forth in Exhibit F, together with the subject matter upon which the expert is expected to testify, the mental impressions and opinions held by the expert and the facts known to the expert (regardless of when the factual information was acquired) which relate to or form the bases of the mental impressions and opinions held by the expert. Any Daubert/ Robinson challenges must be stated and prepared for hearing no later than the FPTC. The Court has special instructions and checklists for all parties as to how Final Pretrial Submission 2

the hearing will be conducted. A copy of the form may be requested by the attorneys from the Court Coordinator. The Court utilizes the provisions of Rule 103 Texas Rules of Evidence to rule on all expert testimony pursuant to the Daubert/Robinson standards. During the final pretrial conference, the attorneys must present all objections to the Court concerning expert testimony not previously ruled upon by the Court or objection is waived. A copy of the expert s report may be attached in satisfaction of this requirement if the report conforms to the requirements of the law and of this Court. All witnesses who are expected to provide any amount of expert testimony must be set forth in this list, including parties who are to testify as to the value of their own property and lay witnesses who are expected to render expert opinions as well as give factual testimony that exceeds the permissible limits of Rule 701 Tex.R.Evid (ex., an artisan such as a plumber, electrician or mechanic who is expected to opine concerning their specialized knowledge.) If there is any doubt as to whether Rule 701 Tex. R. Evid. is applicable, the Court requires that the lay witness be listed and treated both as a lay witness and as an expert. Uncooperative, non-retained experts who have dealt with a party and have unique factual information (such as treating physicians or mechanics) must be listed and designed as nonretained experts. The Court will consider granting extraordinary relief for non-retained expert witnesses who are uncooperative. Qualifications, mental impressions, facts known to the expert and opinions of the expert not disclosed in the expert s report as shown in Exhibit F will not be permitted as trial testimony. After receipt of opponent s Final Pretrial Submission, the Parties must confer in an attempt to resolve all objections concerning expert witnesses. 7. All exhibits are certified by the attorney(s) as being in existence, pre-marked by the attorneys and listed with a fair and brief description attached hereto as Exhibit G. The Court utilizes the provisions of Rule 103 Tex.R.Evid to rule on all exhibits, the legal admissibility of testimony and all other evidence as part of pretrial procedures. The attorneys must present all evidentiary objections to the Court during the final pretrial conference or objection is waived. The Parties must pre-mark all exhibits and list them with a fair and brief description of each exhibit. General descriptions should not be used (ex., all exhibits attached to the deposition of John Doe ; all business records of ABC Company ) except in extreme situations and with leave of Court. Depositions and other written discovery should not be listed here but rather should be listed in Exhibits H & I. The adoption of opposing counsel s exhibits is not permitted, but joint marking of exhibits is encouraged. All listed exhibits must be available for examination by opposing counsel within a reasonable time and at a reasonable place prior to the Final Pretrial Conference. The parties must confer prior to the Final Pretrial Conference in an attempt to resolve all objections concerning exhibits. It is the burden of the objecting party to contact opposing counsel or make a good faith effort to do so concerning all objections. Final Pretrial Submission 3

All objections not resolved by agreement must be presented in writing and called to the attention of the Court for ruling at the Final Pretrial Conference. All objections not timely presented and all objections for which a specific ruling is not timely obtained are waived. The Court expects the parties (jointly or separately) to produce a final list of premarked exhibits to be admitted into evidence by the Court immediately after opening statements. 8. The depositions that will be offered into evidence at the trial are listed in Exhibit H. Included in this list are the depositions that will be offered into evidence (including witnesses who are available to testify at trial.) Shown and designated separately in Exhibit H are the depositions that may be offered of witnesses who are not reasonably expected to be present at trial. The Court will consider admission into evidence of summaries of depositions as permitted by Rule 1006, Tex. R. Evid. Such summaries must be fair and reasonable representations of the underlying testimony. Proposed written summaries should be presented to opposing counsel five days prior to the date the Final Pretrial Submission is due to be filed so as to permit a reasonable time in which to examine and consider whether the summary is fair and reasonable. Objections must be in writing and presented to opposing counsel no later than three days prior to the date the Final Pretrial Submission is due to be filed. The proposed summary and the unresolved objections must be filed with the Final Pretrial Submission to be ruled upon at the Final Pretrial Conference, in default of which all objections are waived. All videotaped depositions as well as written depositions must be edited to include only relevant testimony, and the edited lines and pages proposed for use must be reduced to writing in the form of referenced page and line numbers and served on opposing counsel not less than five days before the Final Pretrial Submission is due to be filed to enable counsel to make objections. The objecting party shall contact counsel for the opposing party in a good faith attempt to resolve all objections prior to the final pretrial conference and shall present written objections to the opposing counsel not less than three days before the Final Pretrial Submission is due to be filed. The objections must be filed with the Final Pretrial Submission, in default of which all objections are waived. 9. The undersigned party certifies that all written discovery, including interrogatory answers, responses to requests for production, deposition testimony, affidavits submitted in connection with motions for summary judgment and information relating to expert witnesses have been supplemented as required by the Texas Rules of Civil Procedure. 10. The Motions listed in Exhibit J will be ruled upon by the Court at final pretrial conference if called to the Court s attention. 11. Estimated time of trial is shown on Exhibit K. 12. The party certifies that this dispute cannot be settled and all reasonable means of settlement have been exhausted prior to filing this Final Pretrial Submission. This Final Pretrial Submission 4

further certifies that the original and copies were properly served on all counsel with a copy furnished to the trial judge. Signed on Attorney(s) for Final Pretrial Submission 5