IUSD ELECTORAL PROCESS UNDER CONSIDERATION. May 8, 2018

Similar documents
IUSD ELECTORAL PROCESS UNDER CONSIDERATION. March 27, 2018

July 19, Washington Unified 2018 Districting

Presentation to the Orange County Committee on School District Organization

Sweetwater Union High School District Demographic and Districting Introduction

Introduction to the California Voting Rights Act (CVRA) Peter Fagen, F3 Larry Ferchaw, CS James Ayden, F3 July 24, 2017

City of Placentia By-District Elections Briefing. February 6, 2018

December 12, City of Oxnard Consideration of By-District Elections

City of LEMOORE CALIFORNIA. Staff Report

Legal & Policy Criteria Governing Establishment of Districts

December 12, City of Oxnard Consideration of By-District Elections

Special Meeting/Public Hearing Board of Trustees Coast Community College District. Date: Tuesday, October 3, 2017

October 17, Lompoc 2017 Districting Initial Hearings

ORDINANCE NO C.S.

May 9, City of South San Francisco 2018 Districting Initial Hearings

City of Oakland 2013 Redistricting Town Hall forum

The California Voting Rights Act What To Do When Your Agency Gets a Letter

Elections by Trustee Area Informational Session on Transition to Trustee Areas. June 25-26, 2018

Legal & Policy Criteria Governing Establishment of Electoral Districts

Note: Wards 1, 3 and 5 will hold elections on November 3, 2020; and Wards 2, 4 and 6 will hold

The California Voting Rights Act: Recent Legislation & Litigation Outcomes

H 7749 S T A T E O F R H O D E I S L A N D

Linda C. Luna, Superintendent. DISTRICT OFFICE 930 Westacre Road West Sacramento, CA 95691

Item 10A 1 of 37

DATE ISSUED: 2/5/ of 5 UPDATE 110 BBB(LEGAL)-A

Sully District Fairfax County. Prepared by Ralph Hubbard Sully Supervisor Representative Fairfax County Redistricting Committee 3/23/2011

CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT. SUBJECT: Resolution Declaring Intent to Transition to District-Based Elections (10/15/20)

Ballot Measures-V Section

DATE ISSUED: 2/15/ of 5 UPDATE 110 BBB(LEGAL)-A1

October 16, Whittier Union High School District Introduction to Districting

City Council Election System Changes Project. CVRA Community Input Workshop

Sequoia Union High School District Districting Public Forums

City of Redlands Introduction to 2016 Districting

Michigan Redistricting Ballot Proposal (VNP)

4/4/2017. The Foundation. What is the California Voting Rights Act (CVRA)? CALIFORNIA VOTING RIGHTS ACT PUTTING THE 2016 LEGISLATION INTO PRACTICE

City of Rancho Cucamonga Presentation of Draft Maps

Implementing Trustee Area Elections: Procedural & Substantive Considerations

CITY OF VALLEJO SPECIAL CITY COUNCIL MEETING: ACTION ITEM A. City of Vallejo Districting Criteria and Process

CITY OF DANA POINT AGENDA REPORT

Legal & Policy Criteria Governing Establishment of Electoral Districts

RESOLUTION NO

The California Voting Rights Act

加州投票权法案. California Voting Rights Act. Case History Examples. City Council Election System Changes. Overview. CVRA Legal Precedent

(132nd General Assembly) (Substitute Senate Joint Resolution Number 5) A JOINT RESOLUTION

October 30, City of Menlo Park Introduction to Election Systems

REPORT OF THE ADVISORY COMMITTEE ON ELECTORAL DISTRICTS

Redistricting & the Quantitative Anatomy of a Section 2 Voting Rights Case

CITY OF EL CAJON. (This Measure will appear on the ballot in the following form.)

El Monte Union High School District Introduction to the California Voting Rights Act & Districting

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION. v. Civil Case No. 1:17-CV TCB

GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF NORTH CAROLINA SESSION 2005 H 1 HOUSE BILL 1448

The Next Swing Region: Reapportionment and Redistricting in the Intermountain West

H.B. 69 Feb 13, 2019 HOUSE PRINCIPAL CLERK

AMENDED SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT

NEW YORK STATE SENATE PUBLIC MEETING ON REDISTRICTING DECEMBER 14, 2010

City of Palm Coast City Council Districts. City Council Public Hearing June 14, 2011

Citizens Union and the League of Women Voters of New York State

CITY OF SACRAMENTO MEASURE L

Citizens Union and the League of Women Voters of New York State

City of Mesquite Districting City Council Districts. Presented By: Gunnar Seaquist Partner, Bickerstaff Heath Delgado Acosta LLP

IN THE FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA IN AND FOR CARSON CITY

Overview. League of Women Voters: The Ins and Outs of Redistricting 4/21/2015

Case 2:12-cv TOR Document Filed 10/03/14 EXHIBIT A

Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council. Analysis of United Student District Amendment Redistricting Plan

AN AMENDMENT TO ESTABLISH THE ARKANSAS CITIZENS' REDISTRICTING COMMISSION

Case 1:11-cv DLI-RR-GEL Document 182 Filed 03/05/12 Page 1 of 1 PageID #: 2214

PUBLIC HEARING TO RECEIVE INPUT FROM THE COMMUNITY ON CITY COUNCIL DISTRICTS TO BE ESTABLISHED FOR DISTRICT-BASED ELECTIONS

CHANGING DEMOGRAPHICS AND IMMIGRATION POLITICS IN COLORADO. June 25, 2014

ST. TAMMANY PARISH SCHOOL BOARD 2010 CENSUS/2014 ELECTION REDISTRICTING DECEMBER 1, Presentation by REDISTRICTING L.L.C.

Case 1:17-cv TCB-WSD-BBM Document 94-1 Filed 02/12/18 Page 1 of 37

Redistricting Overview San Mateo County Harbor District

FINAL REPORT OF BERNARD GROFMAN, SPECIAL MASTER. November 29, 2017

Robert McEntire, Chief Business and Financial Officer

Case 5:11-cv OLG-JES-XR Document Filed 08/22/13 Page 1 of 17 EXHIBIT 1

ORDINANCE NO WHEREAS, the Town currently elects five Council Members using an at large election system; and

4/23/2018. CCAC Annual Conference April 19, a.m. 12 p.m. Break w/ Exhibitors 10 a.m. 10:30 a.m.

INITIATIVE PETITION AMENDMENT TO THE CONSTITUTION

REDISTRICTING FUN U DA D M A EN E TA T L A S L

RESOLUTION NO Adopted by the Sacramento City Council. July 26, 2016

Request to Change Election System without an Election Election Waiver Ed. Code, 72036

CITY OF DANA POINT AGENDA REPORT

GIS in Redistricting Jack Dohrman, GIS Analyst Nebraska Legislature Legislative Research Office

Attorneys for Plaintiffs JOSE MORENO, AMIN DAVID, and CONSUELO GARCIA IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

As Introduced. 132nd General Assembly Regular Session S. J. R. No A J O I N T R E S O L U T I O N

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA NORTHERN DIVISION

GUIDE TO DISTRICTING LAW PREPARED FOR THE CHULA VISTA DISTRICTING COMMISSION

Choose or Chosen? An Interactive Exploration of Congressional District Boundaries

2009 Election Uniformity Workshop

CITIZENS REDISTRICTING COMMISSION PROPOSAL EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Local Opportunities for Redistricting Reform

ORDINANCE NO City Attorney Summary

Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act. Also currently being litigated under the. the Equal Protection Clause of the 14th

TX RACIAL GERRYMANDERING

WISCONSIN SUPREME COURT ELECTIONS WITH PARTISANSHIP

Redistricting 101 Why Redistrict?

100TH GENERAL ASSEMBLY State of Illinois 2017 and 2018

Submitted by: ASSEMBLY MEMBERS HALL, TRAIN!

APPORTIONMENT Statement of Position As announced by the State Board, 1966

Staff Report. Andrea Ouse, Director of Community and Economic Development

Summary of the Fair Congressional Districts for Ohio Initiative Proposal

Case 5:11-cv OLG-JES-XR Document Filed 06/09/14 Page 1 of 17 EXHIBIT C

Transcription:

IUSD ELECTORAL PROCESS UNDER CONSIDERATION May 8, 2018

No Impact on School Attendance Areas The election method for the members of the IUSD Board of Education has no impact on school district or student attendance boundaries. School attendance boundaries will not change as part of this consideration or process. 2

Types of Election Systems At-Large Elections Candidates must reside within the District s boundaries and are elected by all the voters who reside in the District s boundaries. (Ed Code Section 5030(a).) By-Trustee Area Elections Candidates must reside in specific Trustee Areas within the District s boundaries and are elected only by voters who reside in the same Trustee Area. (Ed Code Section 5030(b).) 3

4

Consideration of Transitioning From At-Large to By-Trustee Area Elections The Process: Prior to preparing trustee area maps, the District held two public hearings and other community information events to gather community input on the composition of proposed trustee area maps. After consideration of the input provided by the community, the Board determined the criteria to be used by a demographer in drawing maps of proposed trustee areas. 5

Consideration of Transitioning From At-Large to By-Trustee Area Elections The Process: The District published three proposed trustee area maps for consideration by the community. With each map, the District published the potential sequence of the elections to show how staggered terms will impact individual trustee areas. The District will hold two additional public hearings to gather community input on the content of the proposed maps and election sequencing. If revisions to any proposed map are made, the District will publish the revised proposed map for at least seven days prior to consideration of adopting a map. 6

Consideration of Transitioning From At-Large to By-Trustee Area Elections The Process: The District will hold a public hearing, then seek Board approval of a map and sequence of elections. The County Committee on School District Organization must hold at least one public hearing within the District s boundaries. Following the public hearing, the County Committee on School District Organization must by resolution either approve or reject the proposal. 7

Consideration of Transitioning From At-Large to By-Trustee Area Elections The Process: If a By-Trustee Area Election method is adopted, there is no immediate impact on the term of any current member of the District s Governing Board. (Education Code section 5021). Instead, all future elections would occur in the trustee areas in which the Board members whose terms are expiring currently reside or as stated in the adopted sequencing of elections. 8

Steps in the Process March 13 Board of Education adopted Resolution No. 17-18-28: Intent to Initiate the Process of Establishing Trustee Areas and Elections By-Trustee Areas. March- April The District will hold Community Information Meetings about the process and to obtain feedback on the trustee area map criteria. March 27 Public Hearing No. 1: The public is invited to provide input regarding the composition of the proposed districts. April 11 Public Hearing No. 2: The public is invited to provide input regarding the composition of the proposed districts. After which the Board adopted Resolution No. 17-18-36: Establishing Criteria for Consideration of Developing Trustee Areas. 9

Steps in the Process, Continued April 17 Proposed trustee map(s) and potential sequence of elections available for public review. May 8 May 29 Public Hearing No. 3: The public is invited to provide input regarding the content of the draft maps and the proposed sequence of elections, if applicable. Public Hearing No. 4: The public is invited to provide input regarding the content of the draft map or maps and the proposed sequence of elections, if applicable. Public Hearing No. 5: The Board may adopt a map and sequence of elections for approval by the Orange County Committee on School District Organization. June The Orange County Committee on School District Organization would conduct a public hearing within IUSD boundaries to consider approval of the proposed trustee area map and sequence of elections. 10

Criteria for Consideration of Developing Trustee Areas The Board adopted Resolution 17-18-36, setting forth the following criteria to guide in the establishment of proposed trustee areas, in no particular order: 1. Each trustee area shall contain a nearly equal number of inhabitants; 2. Trustee area borders shall be drawn in a manner that complies with the Federal Voting Rights Act; 3. Trustee areas shall consist of contiguous territory in as compact a form as possible given the other criteria set forth herein; 4. Trustee area borders shall respect communities of interest as much as possible; 11

Criteria for Consideration of Developing Trustee Areas 5. Trustee area borders shall consider school attendance zone boundaries, with emphasis on having multiple trustee areas within each District high school attendance area to the extent possible; 6. Trustee area borders shall consider school attendance zone boundaries, with emphasis on having multiple District high school attendance areas within each trustee area to the extent possible; 7. Trustee area borders shall consider jurisdictional boundaries as much as possible; 12

Criteria for Consideration of Developing Trustee Areas 8. Trustee area borders shall attempt to avoid head-to-head contests between incumbent members of the Board insofar as this does not conflict with federal or state law; 9. Trustee areas known to be areas of higher-than-average population growth in the two to five years following the establishment of trustee areas may be underpopulated within the population deviation amounts allowed by law; and 10. The boundaries of the trustee areas shall observe topography and geography, such as man-made geographical features including freeways, highways and major streets, etc. as potential divisions between trustee areas, insofar as practicable. 13

Draft Maps All three maps (Green, Purple and Yellow): Are population balanced, contiguous, reasonably compact, and respect the voters wishes by avoiding pairing trustees Have one trustee area that is 16% Latino CVAP Have two trustee areas where Asian-Americans are 40 to 45% of CVAP Have two trustee areas where Asian-Americans are 30 to 35% of CVAP Ensure that each High School Attendance Zone has at least two trustees representing it Try to ensure that each trustee represents multiple High School Attendance Zones True in the Yellow map and for all areas except Area 3 in Green and Purple maps. In Green and Purple, Area 3 has only University High residents. 14

North/South split, with Areas 4 and 5 in the north and 1, 2 and 3 in the south. The way Area 4 wraps around Area 5 is necessary to ensure two trustees represent Portola High. 15 May 8, 2018

As close to a regional map as possible while still having multiple trustees for each High School zone. Northern Area 4; northwestern Area 5; central Area 2; central/southeastern Area 1; and southern Area 3. 16 May 8, 2018

Most compact option. Eastern Area 1. Areas 2 5 are highly compact, following major roads for almost every border. Area 1 s shift around the south end of Area 3 enables Area 3 to move north to pick up part of a 2 nd High School attendance zone (Woodbridge). 17 May 8, 2018 Area 1 crosses county island, but remains contiguous because it is not divided by another district.

Questions? 18