ORGANIZATIONAL SENTENCING GUIDELINES THE HONORABLE RUBEN J. CASTILLO VICE-CHAIR, U.S. SENTENCING COMMISSION

Similar documents
CHAPTER EIGHT - SENTENCING OF ORGANIZATIONS

2015 GUIDELINES MANUAL

CHAPTER EIGHT SENTENCING OF ORGANIZATIONS

Due Diligence: The Sentencing Guidelines and the Lawyer s Role in Corporate Compliance and Ethics Programs. by Steven Carr

THE REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA OFFICE OF THE GENERAL COUNSEL

Case: 1:16-cr MRB Doc #: 18 Filed: 02/06/17 Page: 1 of 19 PAGEID #: 98 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION

Fraud, bribery and money laundering: corporate offenders Definitive Guideline DEFINITIVE GUIDELINE

The McNulty Memorandum Principles of Federal Prosecution of Business Organizations

How the Federal Sentencing Guidelines Work: An Abridged Overview

ARGUMENTS FOR PROSECUTORS OF ENVIRONMENTAL

United States v. Biocompatibles, Inc. Criminal Case No.

WRITTEN STATEMENT OF THE UNITED STATES SENTENCING COMMISSION BEFORE THE ANTITRUST MODERNIZATION COMMISSION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION PLEA AGREEMENT

Sarbanes-Oxley Act of Presented to the Board of Trustees March 10, 2005

IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE

PUBLIC LAW JULY 30, STAT. 745

Massachusetts Sentencing Commission Current Statutes Mass. Gen. Laws ch. 211E 1-4 (2018)

A Message to Legal Personnel

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION PLEA AGREEMENT

(1) the nature and circumstances of the offense and the history and characteristics of the defendant;

2015 AMENDMENTS TO THE FEDERAL SENTENCING GUIDELINES JOHN WEBER, ASST. FEDERAL DEFENDER FEDERAL PUBLIC DEFENDER CJA PANEL SEMINAR DECEMBER 4, 2015

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION PLEA AGREEMENT

Thursday, October 19, :15-5:45 p.m. Stanford Law School Room 320D

1.4 The external auditors will be invited to attend meetings of the Committee on a regular basis.

INTERNAL INVESTIGATIONS: AVOIDING PITFALLS. Sherilyn Pastor, McCarter & English, LLP (and) Rosemary Stewart, Hollingsworth LLP

Litigation PROPOSED AMENDMENTS TO FEDERAL SENTENCING GUIDELINES POTENTIALLY IMPACT ORGANIZATIONAL COMPLIANCE PROGRAMS

M E M O R A N D U M. Bill Smith, Esquire Attorney for John Doe. Meredith Patti, Esquire Mary Cate Rush, Chief Statistician. DATE: August 5, 2014

The Indirect Bump: Indirect Commerce and Corporate Cartel Plea Agreements

TOP TEN PITFALLS ENCOUNTERED IN INTERNAL INVESTIGATIONS. March 2008

Families Against Mandatory Minimums 1612 K Street, N.W., Suite 700 Washington, D.C

Audit Committee Terms of Reference

United States v. Telia Company AB Deferred Prosecution Agreement. Defendant Telia Company AB (the Company ), by its undersigned representatives,

Accountancy Scheme Sanctions Guidance

Federal Prosecution of Corporations

UNITED CONTINENTAL HOLDINGS, INC. Corporate Governance Guidelines (Approved December 6, 2017 )

Attorney/Client Privilege Waiver Requests: Charging Corporations Under The McNulty Memorandum KIRSTEN V. MAYER

Some Thoughts on Proposed Revisions to the Organizational Guidelines

USA v. Adriano Sotomayer

Counter Fraud Framework Manual Prosecution and Sanction Policy Statement

Directive. Staff Manual - Staff Rules Office of Ethics and Business (EBC) Bank Access to Information Policy Designation Public

A Practitioner s Guide to Suspension, Debarment and Contractor Responsibility

FEDERAL PUBLIC DEFENDER District of Arizona 850 Adams Street, Suite 201 PHOENIX, ARIZONA 85007

Governance, Human Resource, Nominating and Compensation Committee. Mandate

Follow this and additional works at:

Model Annotated Corporate Plea Agreement Last Updated 12/20/2013 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT [XXXXXXX] DISTRICT OF [XXXXXXXXX] ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TALLAHASSEE DIVISION. vs. CASE NO. xxxxx SENTENCING MEMORANDUM

Redress Facilitation Orders As a Sanction Against Corporations

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI WESTERN DIVISION PLEA AGREEMENT

Terms Of Reference Audit Committee February 2011

Exceptional Reporting Services, Inc. P.O. Box Corpus Christi, TX

Litigating with the SEC

11/29/2017 Deputy Attorney General Rosenstein Delivers Remarks at the 34th International Conference on the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act OPA Depa

AUDIT COMMITTEE OF IRON MOUNTAIN INCORPORATED CHARTER

involved in the transaction, full restitution, a special

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA

COMMITTEE ON CRIMINAL

HOUSE BILL 299 A BILL ENTITLED

Responding to Government Investigations: What to do when the Government Knocks. Gabriel Colwell Partner Squire Patton Boggs (US) LLP

RICARDO PLC TERMS OF REFERENCE FOR THE AUDIT COMMITTEE. functions and powers set out in these terms of reference.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

ALUFER MINING LIMITED ( the COMPANY ) AUDIT COMMITTEE CHARTER

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Case 1:17-cr ABJ Document 525 Filed 02/23/19 Page 1 of 25 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA. Crim. No.

ANTI-BRIBERY POLICY 1. INTRODUCTION

FCA Mission: Our Approach to Enforcement. March 2018

Overview of Federal Criminal Cases Fiscal Year 2014

a) Establishment of Committee A committee of the directors to be known as the "Audit Committee" (hereinafter the "Committee") is hereby established.

Responsible Business Conduct: Self-Policing, Self-Reporting, Remediation, and Cooperation

FINAL RESOURCE ASSESSMENT: BLADED ARTICLES AND OFFENSIVE WEAPONS OFFENCES

New Federal Sentencing Guidelines for Organizations Take Effect

Sarbanes-Oxley Voluntary Compliance Policies

World Bank Group Directive

New AAA Rules Provide Straightforward Guidelines for Appeals

January Audit and Risk Committee Terms of Reference

HCA HEALTHCARE, INC. CORPORATE GOVERNANCE GUIDELINES BOARD OF DIRECTORS

On March 27, 2008, Scott Shields ("Shields" or. pleaded guilty to one count of Conspiracy to Fraudulently Obtain

Case 1:17-cr RC Document 3 Filed 12/01/17 Page 1 of 10. United States v. Michael T. Flynn

Full file at

ALI-ABA Federal Sentencing Update After Kimbrough vs. The U. S. Presented in cooperation with CLE Options June 13, 2008 Live Video Webcast

WORLD BANK SANCTIONS PROCEDURES

AUDIT COMMITTEE. Terms of Reference

AUDIT COMMITTEE CHARTER

Terms of Reference of the AstraZeneca Audit Committee

and Article I. PURPOSE

Sentencing 101 A beginner s guide to sentencing in Federal Courts. March 23, 2016 Michelle Nahon Moulder, Assistant Federal Public Defender

Case 3:11-cr DRD Document 22 Filed 03/15/11 Page 1 of 14

(1) This article shall be titled the Office of Inspector General, Palm Beach County, Florida Ordinance.

Case 3:17-cr HEH Document 11 Filed 07/19/17 Page 1 of 11 PageID# 16

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION PLEA AGREEMENT

S17Y1499, S17Y1502, S17Y1623. IN THE MATTER OF ANTHONY SYLVESTER KERR. These disciplinary matters are before the court on the reports filed by

Preliminary Outline of Draft Forensic Reform Legislation 5/5/10

Audit Committee - Terms of Reference

FY 2011 Performance Oversight Hearing

Roundtable on challenges and co-ordination of leniency programmes - Note by the United States

Anti-Bribery and Corruption Policy

ll1. THE SENTENCING COMMISSION

TERMS OF REFERENCE AUDIT & RISK COMMITTEE (Approved July 29, 2016; Amended September 28, 2017)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION

Running head: WHISTLEBLOWING AND SARBANES-OXLEY 1

COMMITTEE OF INVESTIGATION GUIDELINES AND PROCEDURES MANUAL

Transcription:

ORGANIZATIONAL SENTENCING GUIDELINES THE HONORABLE RUBEN J. CASTILLO VICE-CHAIR, U.S. SENTENCING COMMISSION

CHAPTER EIGHT: OVERVIEW FINE CALCULATIONS UNITED STATES SENTENCING COMMISSION GUIDELINES MANUAL INCENTIVE STRUCTURE DETERRENCE COMPLIANCE PRINCIPLES

What Is An Organization? - 8A1.1 n.1 A person other than an individual 18 U.S.C. 18 State and local governments Non profit organizations Corporations and Partnerships Trade associations and unions Pension funds & trusts

POLICY OF DETERRENCE Carrot and Stick Operation of the Criminal Penalty Structure Encourage partnership in crime control Reward self-policing, self-reporting, and voluntary disclosure

BASE FINE CALCULATION FOR ORGANIZATIONS GREATEST OF LOSS OR GAIN SARBANES OXLEY EFFECT FINE TABLE RANGE 8C2.4 HUGE INCREASE JANUARY 25, 2003

SARBANES OXLEY ACT AMENDMENTS AFFECT CHAPTER EIGHT FINE TABLE Effective Date: January 25, 2003 Substantial penalty increase for fraud-related offense conduct in Chapter Two (individual defendants) Direct effect on calculation of base fine for organizations under Chapter Eight See Commission Report to Congress http://www.ussc.gov

PENALTY INCREASE ILLUSTRATION Publicly-traded company convicted of securities fraud > 250 victims $1.2 million loss caused $17.5 M Twelve fold increase in base fine $ 3.7 M

Fine Range - 8C2.7; 8A1.1 n.2 Seriousness of the Offense x Fine Culpability = Range BASE FINE MULTIPLIERS Minimum Maximum Exceptions

Determining Culpability Score - 8C2.5 Base Culpability Score AGGRAVATING FACTORS Level of Authority (Size) Prior History Violation of an Order Obstruction of Justice MITIGATING FACTORS 5 POINTS +5,+4,+3 +2 or +1 +2 OR +1 +3 Effective Program to Prevent & Detect Violations Self Reporting, Cooperation & Acceptance of Responsibility -3-5,-2 or -1

IMPACT OF COMPLIANCE PROGRAMS: 8C2.5(f) Seven Minimum Steps - 8A1.1 n.3(k) 1-7 Compliance standards High-level oversight Careful delegation of authority Effective communication Monitoring and audits -3 Consistent discipline Process modifications

INCENTIVE STRUCTURE: WHAT S IT WORTH? $40,000,000 $10,000,000 10 $500,000 5 0

PROBATION REQUIRED: 8D1.1 Ensure compliance with restitution Safeguard organization s ability to pay penalties No compliance program, and over 50 employees Prior violations for similar offenses within 5 years High level participation in wrongdoing Prevent future criminal conduct If a fine not imposed Accomplish the statutory purposes of sentencing

USSC - - AHEAD OF THE CURVE

AD HOC ADVISORY GROUP Appointed January 2002 : 10 th Anniversary of Organizational Guidelines 18-month term 16 members with diverse expertise Mandate: Assess criteria for effective compliance programs

EXTENSIVE SOLICITATION OF PUBLIC VIEWS Request for Comment: March 19, 2002 & August 21, 2002 Public Hearing: November 14, 2002 Preliminary Report: March 2003 Final Report: October 2003 See http: www.ussc.gov /Organizational Guideline Section for all comment, witness testimony and transcripts

KEY ISSUES UNDER CONSIDERATION Leadership Accountability and Corporate Governance Administration of Compliance Programs Confidentiality, Internal Reporting Whistleblowing Cooperation and Waiver of Privileges Methods for increasing incentives for compliance

EXAMPLE OF ISSUES RAISED AT HEARING Emphasize tone at the top. Require assessment, auditing & monitoring of ethics/compliance programs. Clarify training methods & frequency. Square Guideline self-reporting policy with confidentiality & specter of third-party litigation. Re-visit application to small businesses.

LEGISLATIVE HARBINGER OF CHANGE?... [T]he Chapter 8 Guidelines relating to Sentencing Organizations for criminal conduct are outdated and do not sufficiently deter organizational or corporate misconduct.... Requires complete review of the Chapter 8 corporate misconduct guidelines, which are outdated and need to be toughened to deter corporate crime. --- S. 2010, Judiciary Committee Report regarding proposed Sarbanes Oxley legislation, May 6, 2002 General Directive in Sarbanes Oxley Act for Commission to assess and amend Chapter Eight as appropriate