European Patents. Page 1 of 6

Similar documents
pct2ep.com the reliable and efficient way to progress your PCT patent application in Europe Pocket Guide to European Patents

The Unitary Patent and the Unified Patent Court. Dr. Leonard Werner-Jones

THE NEW EU PATENT: COST-EFFECTIVE ALTERNATIVES FOR YOUR BUSINESS

IS 2016 THE FINAL STRETCH BEFORE THE ENTRY IN FORCE OF

Foreign Patent Law. Why file foreign? Why NOT file foreign? Richard J. Melker

The life of a patent application at the EPO

PROPOSALS FOR CREATING UNITARY PATENT PROTECTION IN THE EUROPEAN UNION

European Patent with Unitary Effect

The European Patent Office

Dr Julian M. Potter February 2014

EU Trade Mark Application Timeline

PATENT SYSTEM STATUS OFREFORMS

Developments towards a unitary European patent system

The European Patent Office: serving the global economy. François-Régis Hannart Principal Director European and International Co-operation

Machine Translation at the EPO Concept, Status and Future Plans

The European Patent and the UPC

HANDLING OF PATENT APPLICATIONS UNDER THE EPC

Facts and figures 2016

R 84a EPC does not apply to filing date itself as was no due date missed. So, effective date for and contacts subject matter is

FC3 (P5) International Patent Law 2 FINAL Mark Scheme 2017

Patent reform package - Frequently Asked Questions

Global Dossier

Dehns Guide to the Unitary Patent and Unified Patent Court

The European Patent Office An introduction to the EPO and the European patent system. Jesus Roldan Andrade, EPO 27 September 2013

European patent filings

Unitary patent and Unified Patent Court: the proposed framework

Unitary Patent Guide. Obtaining, maintaining and managing Unitary Patents

Unitary Patent Procedure before the EPO

EUROPEAN UNION. Brussels, 12 December 2012 (OR. en) 2011/0093 (COD) PE-CONS 72/11 PI 180 CODEC 2344 OC 70

General Information Concerning. of IndusTRIal designs

Our Speakers: Rudy I. Kratz Partner; Fitch, Even, Tabin & Flannery LLP. Tony Wray Director and Founder; Optimus Patents Ltd.

THE EUROPEAN UNIFIED PATENT SYSTEM:

BIO-EUROPE Anticipated changes to European Patent Law. Ingwer Koch Director Patent Law European Patent Office. 12 November 2007, Hamburg

The Unitary Patent & The Unified Patent Court IP Key & Centre for Commercial Law Studies, Queen Mary University of London 8 November 2016

Europe-wide patent protection and the competence of the Unified Patent Court

QUESTION PAPER REFERENCE: FC3 PERCENTAGE MARK AWARDED: 59% six months after the publication of European search report

The impact of international patent systems: Evidence from accession to the European Patent Convention

Effect of Brexit on IP protection

(Acts whose publication is obligatory) concerning the creation of a supplementary protection certificate for medicinal products

Patent Protection: Europe

European Patent Law. Gwilym Roberts Daniel Brook

Effective Mechanisms for Challenging the Validity of Patents

(Legislative acts) REGULATIONS

EUROPEAN COMMISSION COMMUNITY PATENT CONSULTATION COMPTIA S RESPONSES BRUSSELS, 18 APRIL

Utility Models in Southeast Asia and Europe and their Strategic Use in Litigation. Talk Outline. Introduction & Background

The Progress to Date with the Unitary European Patent and the Unified Patent Court for Europe

The potential impact of Brexit on the European Patenting landscape

FC3 International Patent Law Question Paper Sample Assessment Material

Annex 2 DEFINITIONS FOR TERMS AND FOR STATISTICS ON PROCEDURES

How patents work An introduction for law students

PUBLIC LIMITE EN COUNCILOF THEEUROPEANUNION. Brussels,17November /11. InterinstitutionalFile: 2011/0093(COD) LIMITE PI154 CODEC1979

UNITARY PATENT PROTECTION (UPP) PACKAGE

Draft Rules relating to Unitary Patent Protection revised version of Rules 1 to 11 of SC/16/13

Council Decision of 10 March 2011 authorising enhanced cooperation in the area of the creation of unitary patent protection (2011/167/EU)

City, University of London Institutional Repository. This version of the publication may differ from the final published version.

PATENT SYSTEM STATUS OF REFORMS

This refers to the discretionary clause where a Member State decides to examine an application even if such examination is not its responsibility.

Foundation Certificate

Developments towards a unitary European patent system

Developing an International IP strategy. Leslie Prichard UK Chartered & European Patent Attorney European Design Attorney culverstons

Changing the game An overview of the Unitary Patent

Council Decision of 10 March 2011 authorising enhanced cooperation in the area of the creation of unitary patent protection (2011/167/EU)

COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION. Brussels, 15 April /11 Interinstitutional File: 2011/0094 (CNS) PI 32 PROPOSAL

The Patents Act 1977 (as amended)

I m in the Dublin procedure what does this mean?

Patentable Subject Matter and Medical Use Claims in the Pharmaceutical Sector

Prosecuting an Israel Patent Application and Beyond

Patent litigation. Block 1. Module Priority. Essentials: Priority. Introduction

Unified Patent Court & Rules of Procedure Where do we stand

A Guide through Europe s New Unified Patent System

In accordance with Article 12 of the Unitary Patent Regulation, the renewal fees have to be inter alia:

IP IN A POST-BREXIT EUROPE ENSURING YOUR EUROPEAN IP RIGHTS ARE PROTECTED DATE: 10 NOVEMBER 2016 PRESENTERS: CHRIS FINN, BEN GRAU AND GRAHAM MURNANE

Examiners Report on Paper DII Examiners Report - Paper D Part II

Unitary Patent and Unified Patent Court

Proposal for a COUNCIL REGULATION (EU) on the translation arrangements for the European Union patent {SEC(2010) 796} {SEC(2010) 797}

The EU Unitary Patent System in its current state. EU-Japan Policy Seminar 22 November 2016

pct2ep.com Guide to claim amendment after EPO regional phase entry

Contents. I. Introduction 1. II. Filing of European patent applications 1. III. Documents which may be filed with the competent national authorities 2

Unitary Patent in Europe & Unified Patent Court (UPC)

Patents: opposition proceedings and nullity actions a comparison between Europe and Japan

POST-GRANT AMENDMENT JOHN RICHARDS

GERMAN UTILITY MODEL THE UNDERRATED INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHT DATE: WEDNESDAY 12 NOVEMBER 2014 LOCATION: GLASGOW, UK

1. Procedures for Granting Utility Model

epi-ceipi Basic Training in European Patent Law

DETAILED TABLE OF CONTENTS

European Commission Questionnaire on the Patent System in Europe

Proposal for a REGULATION OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL

The nuts and bolts of oppositions and appeals. Henrik Skødt, European Patent Attorney

IP LAW HARMONISATION: BEYOND THE STATUTE

European patent with unitary effect Reduction of the high costs relating to patents valid throughout the EU?

10 tips for oppositions and the inevitable oral proceedings Barry Franks, European and Swedish patent attorney BRANN AB IP Law Firm Sweden

FINLAND Patents Act No. 550 of December 15, 1967 as last amended by Act No. 101/2013 of January 31, 2013 Enter into force on 1 September 2013

4. COMPARISON OF THE INDIAN PATENT LAW WITH THE PATENT LAWS IN U.S., EUROPE AND CHINA

GLOSSARY of patent related terms in the FOUR OFFICE STATISTICS REPORT 2010 EDITION

THE NEW EUROPEAN UNIFIED PATENT COURT & THE UNITARY PATENT

The EPO follows the EU s Directive on biotechnology patents

IP: Patent law & prosecution

Patent litigation in Europe Major changes to come. Anne-Charlotte Le Bihan, Partner, Bird & Bird ABPI, Rio de Janeiro August 20, 2013

Judicial training in the framework of the Unified Patent Court as a prerequisite for the success of the Unitary Patent System

I have asked for asylum in the EU which country will handle my claim?

Transcription:

European Patents European patents are granted according to the European Patent Convention. The European Patent Convention is administered by the European Patent Organisation, part of which is the European Patent Office which has offices in The Hague, Berlin, Munich, Vienna and Brussels. The European Patent Organisation is an intergovernmental body, and is not part of the European Union, although all European Union states are also contracting states to the European Patent Convention. The European patent therefore covers all European Union member states plus some other additional states. European patents include member states, in which a European patent is effective in during prosecution and immediately upon grant, Extension states which are states where there is an agreement with the European Patent Organisation that their national patent laws will approximate those of the European Patent Convention, and validation states which are states which will accept granted European patents into their national system without any further substantive examination on basic patentability. Page 1 of 6

What can be protected? The basic criteria for obtaining valid granted protection in a European patent are that the invention: - has novelty - involves an inventive step; and - has industrial applicability Subject to these criteria, European patents protect any invention which has a technical character or has technical effect. The novelty requirement means that the claimed invention must not have been made publicly available prior to the earliest priority date of the European patent application. The invention must be novel over the prevailing state-of-the-art at the earliest date of filing the application. The inventive step requirement means that the invention must not be obvious to a person skilled in the relevant art in which the invention lies, having regard to the state-of-the-art. In practice most inventions have industrial applicability and it is rare for a European patent application to be rejected on the basis of lack of industrial applicability. In general, European patents can be obtained in virtually any field of technology, subject to the above criteria. Duration The maximum duration of a European patent is 20 years from the filing date. However, if the European patent claims priority from an earlier patent application, this maximum duration can extend to 21 years from the earliest priority date. For some types of pharmaceutical / medicinal invention, in some countries such as the UK, protection can be extended for a maximum of a further 5 ½ years, by applying for a supplementary protection certificate. This applies only to a small minority of European patents. Official maintenance fees need to be paid centrally for a European patent for the third and subsequent years during the application phase, and every year after grant in the individual national states where the European patent continues after grant. Page 2 of 6

Scope of rights The scope of rights are determined by the wording of the patent document itself, in particular the patent claims. Broadly speaking, a granted European patent gives the patent holder the right to prevent in the case of a product: manufacture, disposing of, offering to dispose of, using, importing a product, keeping a product for disposal or otherwise, or in the case of a process, disposing of, offering to dispose of, using any product of the process, keeping any such product of the process whether for disposal or otherwise, in each of the territories where the European patent is in force. Application procedure European patent applications are filed at the European patent office. A full patent specification with formal drawings needs to be filed at the outset. If you already have the basic document from an earlier procedure, for example a US or UK national filing, that may be suitable with some amendment of the claims. Otherwise, a patent specification needs to be drafted, which will involve discussing technical details of the invention with the inventor in order to prepare the document ready for filing. After filing, the European patent office performs a search of the invention and issues a search report citing prior art documents. It is usual for a European patent application to cite several relevant prior art documents. Often, the European patent office will also issue a search opinion, giving a preliminary opinion on the patentability of the claims as filed. After search, the applicant has the opportunity to amend the claims in view of the prior art cited in the search report, if this is necessary. Eighteen months from the earliest filing date or soon thereafter, the patent specification is published. At this stage, the contents of the specification are publicly available and can be viewed online. Examination can be requested on filing, at the same time as requesting the search. Otherwise, within a maximum of two years from the filing date, substantive examination must be requested, and the examination fee paid. The examining division of the European patent office normally issue an examination report which in most cases contains some observations on patentability which will require amendment of the claims and application. The applicant has a period of four months in which to respond to the examination report. Page 3 of 6

More than one examination report may issue, and at any time up until grant it is open for the examination division to find further prior art or make further observations. Once the examining division is satisfied that the claimed invention is novel and contains an inventive step, the European patent office issues a communication setting out the text in which the European patent office intends to grant the patent. This must be responded to, and at the same time translations of the claims into the two other official languages of the European patent office must be filed (French and German if the application is filed in English). The application then proceeds through to grant within a few months thereafter. According to EPO published figures, the average timescale from receiving an application to grant is around 44 months. However this period depends upon the field of technology and the workload of the examining division in those particular fields. After grant Continuation of the European patent in a designated member state after grant is known as validation in that state. Once granted, the European patent is immediately effective in each contracting State. However in order to continue with the rights, in some states further formalities must be attended to. The current procedure at the end of the European patent is still fragmented on a state-bystate basis. However under the London Agreement on the application of article 65 EPC, a core set of states including CH Switzerland, DE Germany, FR France, GB United Kingdom, IE Republic of Ireland, LU Luxembourg, MC Monaco and MT Malta will accept the European patent without any significant further formalities. For some other states, for the rights to continue requires filing a set of claims translated into the national language of that state. For yet other states, for example ES Spain and IT Italy, these states require a full translation of the whole document into the national language of that state. Once the new Unitary Patent comes into force, most of the European Union will be included as a single designated territory, and the European patent will be able to be continued (validated) for most of the European Union in a single administrative procedure at the end of the European patent procedure. Page 4 of 6

Enforcement of European patents At the moment, generally speaking, a granted European patent gives the patent holder the same rights as would be granted to a national patent holder in the state designated in the European patent. Although obtaining the European patent is a centralised procedure, at the time of writing, no centralised procedure for enforcement of these rights in all designated states occurs. Enforcement is before the individual national courts and patent offices on a country by country basis. Once the new Unitary Patent comes into effect, the system will be supplemented by a single enforcement procedure throughout the whole European Union before the Unified Patent Court. Third party opposition procedure European patents are open to third-party oppositions after grant. Oppositions must be filed within nine months of the date of grant. The centralised opposition procedure before the European patent office allows third parties the opportunity to oppose the whole patent for all designated territories. Third-party oppositions occur in around 5% of all European patents, and around 1 to 2% of European patents are successfully opposed. Oppositions are typically filed on the grounds that the invention lacks novelty and/or inventive step, having regard to items of prior art which the European patent office have missed or which have not been raised during the application phase. The outcomes of an opposition procedure can include: - the opposition is rejected fully and the patent is maintained in amended form - the opposition is partially successful, and the patent remains granted but in amended form; or - the patent is shown to be totally invalid and is revoked in its entirety. Since the basic European patent office search and examination procedure is quite rigorous and of a high standard, this means that most granted European patents have a high presumption of validity, and revoking the patent during opposition proceedings is difficult. Nevertheless, a small percentage of granted European patents are fully revoked as a Page 5 of 6

result of opposition proceedings, in which case they are deemed to be invalid from the outset. Further advice For further information, or to file a European patent application, please contact one of our European patent attorneys. Franks & Co 15 Jessops Riverside Brightside Lane Sheffield S9 2RX T: +44 (0)114 249 9888 F: +44 (0)114 249 9666 E: franksco@franksco.com Franks & Co (South) Carlton House 26 Billing Road Northampton NN1 5AT T: +44 (0)1604 632436 F: +44 (0)1604 626128 E: northampton@franksco.com Franks & Co (Mancunium) Cheadle Place, Cheadle Point Stockport Road, Cheadle Manchester SK8 2JX T: +44 (0)161 820 2891 F: +44 (0)114 2499666 E: manchester@franksco.com www.franksco.com Copyright Franks & Co Limited 2016. Information in this document is necessarily of a generalised nature by way of guidance only. It should not be relied upon as definitive legal advice, and as such, Franks Co accept no responsibility for any actions taken or not taken as a basis of the information in this document. For specific legal advice, please contact one of our offices. Page 6 of 6