Case 4:16-cv Document 1 Filed in TXSD on 09/29/16 Page 1 of 7

Similar documents
Case 4:17-cv Document 1 Filed in TXSD on 07/20/17 Page 1 of 8

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION ORIGINAL COMPLAINT

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA STATESVILLE DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) NATURE OF THE ACTION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) NATURE OF THE ACTION

NATURE OF THE ACTION. This is an action under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended by the

Case 1:11-cv LG-JCG Document 2 Filed 11/17/11 Page 1 of 7

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA CHARLOTTE DIVISION ) ) ) NATURE OF THE ACTION

Case 3:11-cv CRW-TJS Document 1 Filed 04/06/11 Page 1 of 7

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF HAWAII CV

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA DUBLIN DIVISION

Case 1:18-cv RDB Document 1 Filed 07/30/18 Page 1 of 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND BALTIMORE DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NORTH DAKOTA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) NATURE OF THE ACTION

Case 3:06-cv JAP-TJB Document 1 Filed 03/27/2006 Page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) NATURE OF THE ACTION

Case 7:17-cv KMK Document 1 Filed 07/06/17 Page 1 of 11 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Case 3:04-cv RLA Document 1-1 Filed 09/30/2004 Page 1 of 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF PUERTO RICO

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH DAKOTA SOUTHERN DIVISION

Case 4:07-cv JLH Document 1 Filed 06/29/2007 ( Page 1 of 6

Case 1:17-cv Document 1 Filed 09/27/17 Page 1 of 13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN

Case 2:14-cv MPK Document 1 Filed 04/22/14 Page 1 of 6

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT ~,~,~,,.c~...,... ~~"~ ~ " FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLI~ SEP -9 ;i ~ [~: 0~ CBA~OTTE OIVlSlON

This is an action under the Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act of 2008

Case: 1:10-cv Document #: 1-2 Filed: 06/03/09 Page 1 of 5 PageID #:2

Case 9:06-cv RHC Document 1 Filed 02/28/2006 Page 1 of 7

) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case 2:09-cv BSJ-RLE Document 67 Filed 10/28/11 Page 1 of 6

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA PENSACOLA DIVISION NATURE OF THE ACTION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF IOWA DAVENPORT DIVISION. Nature Of The Action

)

)

Case 3:04-cv JSW Document 168 Filed 10/20/2005 Page 1 of 5 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT. FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS eu,:".' IJ~:'LD~~?~:~~URT EASTERN DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

5:06cv1684 JUDGE HICKS MAG. JUDGE HORNSBY

Case 4:04-cv LLP Document 1 Filed 12/28/2004 Page 1 of 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH DAKOTA.

) I ClV a S - BUN. 18 This is an action under Title VII ofthe Civil Rights Act of 1964 and Title I of the Civil

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA. Plaintiff, Defendant. AMENDED COMPLAINT AND JURY TRIAL DEMAND NATURE OF ACTION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA NATURE OF THE ACTION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) NATURE OF THE ACTION

Case 2:05-cv JES-SPC Document 47 Filed 04/24/2006 Page 1 of 11

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NORTH DAKOTA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) COMPLAINT

ORIGINAL COMPLAINT OF THE UNITED STATES EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION TO THE HONORABLE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT:

IN TI-[E UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO. ..-ECHOSTAR COMMUNICATIONS CORPORATION n/k/a DISH, LTD.,

Case 6:10-cv TC Document 1 Filed 09/24/10 Page 1 of 7 Page ID#: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON

-CIVIL RIGHTS EMPLOYMENT

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH DAKOTA SOUTHERN DIVISION. Plaintitl, Defendants. COMPLAINT AND JURY TRIAL DEMAND

FILED. , #, Case 5:05-cv WRF Document 29 Filed 06/06/2006Page 1 of 9 JUN COMMISSION, Plaintiff, ALICIA MANSEL, Civil Action No.

COMPLAINT (Jury Trial Demand)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF HAWAII ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA

Case 4:05-cv CLS Document 1 Filed 05/26/2005 Page 1 of 6

PLAINTIFF AVA SMITH- THOMPSON S COMPLAINT AGAINST DEFENDANT SARA LEE CORPORATION

Case 1:13-cv Document 1 Filed 06/28/13 Page 1 of 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

Case 1:13-cv LEK-KSC Document 1 Filed 12/18/13 Page 1 of 9 PageID #: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF HAWAII ) ) ) ) )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH DAKOTA SOUTHERN DIVISION

Case: 1:06-cv JRA Doc #: 28 Filed: 05/08/09 1 of 9. PageID #: 220

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF HA WAIl. Case No.: NATURE OF THE ACTION AND JURISDICTION

Case 1:06-cv LTB-CBS Document 1 Filed 09/29/2006 Page 1 of 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COUR~A I FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINO~ STRA~ E EASTERN DIVISION 0~U ) ) tl0v 1 0 7_604 ) ) NATURE OF THE ACTION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION ) ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) NATURE OF THE ACTION


UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Case 2:16-cv RSL Document 1 Filed 08/05/16 Page 1 of 13

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA ORLANDO DIVISION

Case 5:14-cv DAE Document 4 Filed 11/10/14 Page 1 of 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SAN ANTONIO DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES

Case 0:10-cv KMM Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/10/2010 Page 1 of 7

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA FORT PIERCE DIVISION

Case 3:15-cv EDL Document 1 Filed 12/09/15 Page 1 of 16

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF HAWAII

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA

Case 2:16-cv GMN-VCF Document 1 Filed 04/26/16 Page 1 of 10

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

Case 1:14-cv KAM-JO Document 8 Filed 07/02/14 Page 1 of 11 PageID #: 36

Case5:11-cv EJD Document28 Filed09/09/11 Page1 of 10

Case 2:15-cv CMR Document 6 Filed 03/28/16 Page 1 of 18 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION. -v- Civil No. 3:12-cv-4176

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Case 1:16-cv Document 1 Filed 11/21/16 Page 1 of 9 PageID #: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT STATE OF RHODE ISLAND COMPLAINT INTRODUCTION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DIVISION OF OHIO EASTERN DISTRICT

Case 6:17-cv Document 1 Filed 10/24/17 Page 1 of 10 PageID #: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA LAFAYETTE DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF SOUTH DAKOTA SOUTHERN DIVISION

Case 1:15-cv KMW Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 10/13/2015 Page 1 of 9

Case 4:14-cv Document 1 Filed in TXSD on 09/08/14 Page 1 of 6

Case 4:10-cv CW Document 1 Filed 10/13/10 Page 1 of 8

Case 1:16-cv Document 1 Filed 11/21/16 Page 1 of 10 PageID #: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT STATE OF RHODE ISLAND COMPLAINT INTRODUCTION

Case 1:13-cv KMW Document 38 Entered on FLSD Docket 10/04/2013 Page 1 of 22

Case 5:11-cv F Document 13 Filed 01/24/12 Page 1 of 9

Case 8:04-cv SCB-TBM Document 32 Filed 10/07/2005 Page 1 of 6

Case 1:08-cv REB Document 1 Filed 12/16/2008 Page 1 of 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COU~ NOV - FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS~i.~ SAN ANTONIO DIVISION

CASE NO. 5:00-CV COMPLAINT IN INTERVENTION ON BEHALF OF JACKQULINE STOKES

Case 2:16-cv JTM-TJJ Document 1 Filed 05/25/16 Page 1 of 11 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA MIAMI DIVISION Case No. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Courthouse News Service

Introduction. Jurisdiction. Parties

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION CONSENT DECREE

Case 3:12-cv M Document 6 Filed 11/07/12 Page 1 of 7 PageID 18

Transcription:

Case 4:16-cv-02909 Document 1 Filed in TXSD on 09/29/16 Page 1 of 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION, Plaintiff, v. CIVIL ACTION NO. DIALLO S ENTERTAINMENT, INC. D/B/A DIALLO S OF HOUSTON, Defendant. JURY TRIAL DEMANDED PLAINTIFF S ORIGINAL COMPLAINT NATURE OF THE ACTION This is an action under Title I of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 and Title I of the Civil Rights Act of 1991 to correct unlawful employment practices on the basis of disability and to provide appropriate relief to Felicia M. Parks ( Parks or Charging Party ). As alleged with greater particularity in paragraphs 15 to 20 below, Defendant unlawfully discriminated against Charging Party by wrongfully terminating her due to her disability or substantially limiting impairment, HIV. JURISDICTION AND VENUE 1. Jurisdiction of this Court is invoked pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 451, 1331, 1337, 1343 and 1345. This action is authorized and instituted pursuant to Section 107(a) of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 ( ADA ), 42 U.S.C. 12117(a), which incorporates by reference Section 706(f)(1) and (3) of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 ( Title VII ), 42 U.S.C. 1

Case 4:16-cv-02909 Document 1 Filed in TXSD on 09/29/16 Page 2 of 7 2000e-5(f)(1) and (3), and pursuant to Section 102 of the Civil Rights Act of 1991, 42 U.S.C. 1981a. 2. Venue is proper within the jurisdiction of the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas, Houston Division. 3. The employment practices alleged to be unlawful were committed in Houston, Harris County, Texas, within the jurisdiction of the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas, Houston Division. PARTIES 4. Plaintiff Equal Employment Opportunity Commission ( Plaintiff or the Commission ) is the agency of the United States of America charged with the administration, interpretation and enforcement of Title I of the ADA and is expressly authorized to bring this action by Section 107(a) of the ADA, 42 U.S.C. 12117(a), which incorporates by reference Sections 706(f)(1) and (3) of Title VII, 42 U.S.C. 2000e-5(f)(1) and (3). 5. At all relevant times, Defendant Diallo s Entertainment, Inc. d/b/a Diallo s of Houston ( Defendant or Diallo s ) has continuously been a Texas corporation doing business in the State of Texas, in the City of Houston, County of Harris, including at the address of 3340 Dixie Dr., Houston, TX 77021, and has continuously had or during the relevant time period had, at least fifteen (15) employees. 6. At all relevant times, Defendant has continuously been an employer engaged in an industry affecting commerce under Sections 101(5) and 101(7) of the ADA, 42 U.S.C. 12111(5) and (7). 7. At all relevant times, Defendant has been a covered entity under Section 101(2) of the ADA, 42 U.S.C. 12111(2). 2

Case 4:16-cv-02909 Document 1 Filed in TXSD on 09/29/16 Page 3 of 7 8. Defendant s registered agent for service of process is Diallo Laquan Roberts located at 10906 Lewis Dr., Houston, Texas 77099-2724. ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES 9. More than thirty days prior to the institution of this lawsuit, Parks filed a charge of discrimination with the Commission alleging violations of the ADA by Defendant. 10. On May 11, 2016, the Commission issued to Defendant a Letter of Determination finding reasonable cause to believe that the ADA was violated and inviting Defendant to join with the Commission in informal methods of conciliation to endeavor to eliminate the unlawful employment practices and provide appropriate relief. 11. Prior to institution of this lawsuit, the Commission s representatives attempted to eliminate the unlawful employment practices alleged below, and to effect voluntary compliance by Defendant with the ADA, through informal methods of conciliation, conference, and persuasion within the meaning of Section 706(b) of Title VII, 42 U.S.C. 2000e-5(b) incorporated by Section 107(a) of the ADA, 42 U.S.C. 12117(a). 12. On September 19, 2016, the Commission issued to Defendant a Notice of Failure of Conciliation advising Defendant that the Commission was unable to secure from Defendant a conciliation agreement acceptable to the Commission. 13. All conditions precedent to the institution of this lawsuit have been fulfilled. STATEMENT OF CLAIMS 14. Defendant owns and operates a nightclub and party venue in Houston, Texas. 15. Since at least March 2014, Defendant has engaged in unlawful employment practices on the basis of disability in violation of Sections 102(a) and (d) and Section 107(a) of the ADA, 42 U.S.C. 12112(a) and (d), 12117(a). 3

Case 4:16-cv-02909 Document 1 Filed in TXSD on 09/29/16 Page 4 of 7 16. Parks is a qualified individual with a disability under Sections 3 and 101(8) of the ADA, 42 U.S.C. 12102 and 12111(8), in that she has an impairment that substantially limits a major life activity or activities, she has a record of an impairment that substantially limits a major life activity or activities, and/or Defendant regarded Parks as having a disability. Respondent subjected Parks to an adverse employment action, termination, because of her disability. 17. Parks was employed by Defendant as a waitress from in or about April 2011 to on or about March 5, 2014, when she was unlawfully terminated. 18. Parks was unlawfully terminated after Leila Roberts ( Roberts ), a manager for and/or owner of Diallo s and Charging Party s direct supervisor, informed Parks that she (Roberts) had heard from an unidentified third party that Charging Party had a substantially limiting impairment, HIV, that Roberts, without any further information or inquiry, believed to be hazardous to Defendant s business. Roberts then demanded, on two separate occasions, that Parks provide documentation to show that she did not, in fact, have HIV. Roberts told Parks that, if she failed to provide such documentation, she would be terminated. Parks was unable to provide such documentation and was terminated. 19. In requiring Parks to provide documentation showing that she did not have a certain disability or impairment based only on an assumption, belief or suspicion that such disability or impairment posed a hazard to the workplace, Defendant made an impermissible disability-related inquiry of Parks, an employee, as to (1) whether she had a disability and (2) the nature or severity of any such disability, and required Charging Party to provide medical documentation regarding her disability or impairment which may also have required a medical examination. 4

Case 4:16-cv-02909 Document 1 Filed in TXSD on 09/29/16 Page 5 of 7 20. Defendant wrongfully terminated Parks employment because of her disability or impairment, HIV. 21. The unlawful employment practices complained of above were intentional. 22. The unlawful employment practices complained of above were done with malice or reckless indifference to the federally protected rights of Parks, in violation of Section 102 of the Civil Rights Act of 1991, 42 U.S.C. 1981a. PRAYER FOR RELIEF Wherefore, the Commission respectfully requests that this Court: A. Grant a permanent injunction enjoining Defendant, its officers, successors, assigns, and all persons in active concert or participation with Defendant, from engaging in disability discrimination. B. Grant a permanent injunction enjoining Defendant, its officers, successors, assigns, and all persons in active concert or participation with Defendant, from engaging in retaliation against employees who make good-faith complaints of discrimination or who otherwise oppose discriminatory conduct. C. Order Defendant to institute and carry out policies, practices, and programs which provide equal employment opportunities for qualified individuals with disabilities, and which eradicate the effects of its past and present unlawful employment practices. D. Order Defendant to make whole Felicia M. Parks by providing appropriate compensation with prejudgment and post-judgment interest, in amounts to be determined at trial, and other affirmative relief necessary to eradicate the effects of its unlawful employment practices described in paragraphs 15-20 above, including, but not limited to, reinstatement where 5

Case 4:16-cv-02909 Document 1 Filed in TXSD on 09/29/16 Page 6 of 7 appropriate or an award of front pay in an amount to be proved at trial if reinstatement is impractical. E. Order Defendant to make whole Felicia M. Parks by providing compensation for past and future pecuniary losses resulting from its unlawful employment practices described in paragraphs 15-20 above, including, but not limited to, the value of lost insurance benefits, and job search expenses, in amounts to be determined at trial. F. Order Defendant to make whole Felicia M. Parks by providing compensation for past and future non-pecuniary losses resulting from its unlawful practices complained of in paragraphs 15-20 above, including, but not limited to, emotional pain and suffering, in amounts to be determined at trial. G. Order Defendant to pay Felicia M. Parks punitive damages for its malicious and reckless conduct described in paragraphs 15-20 above, in amounts to be determined at trial. interest. H. Grant such further relief as the Court deems necessary and proper in the public I. Award the Commission its costs of this action. JURY TRIAL DEMAND Pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 38 and 39, Plaintiff requests a jury trial on all issues raised in the instant Complaint which may be tried by a jury. Respectfully submitted, U.S. EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION P. DAVID LOPEZ General Counsel JAMES LEE Deputy General Counsel 6

Case 4:16-cv-02909 Document 1 Filed in TXSD on 09/29/16 Page 7 of 7 GWENDOLYN YOUNG REAMS Associate General Counsel U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission 131 M Street, N.E. Washington, D.C. 20507 /s/ Connie W. Gatlin CONNIE WILHITE GATLIN Senior Trial Attorney Attorney-in-Charge Texas Bar No. 00792916 Southern Dist. of Texas No. 23624 U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission 1919 Smith St., 6 th Floor Houston, Texas 77002 (713) 651-4976 (713) 651-7995 [facsimile] connie.wilhite@eeoc.gov OF COUNSEL: JIM SACHER Regional Attorney ROSE ADEWALE-MENDES Supervisory Trial Attorney U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission 1919 Smith Street, 7 th floor Houston, Texas 77002 7