IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE WESTERN DIVISION COMPLAINT

Similar documents
COMPLAINT FOR VIOLATIONS OF THE LANHAM ACT AND TRADEMARK INFRINGMENT

COMPLAINT FOR VIOLATIONS OF THE LANHAM ACT AND TRADEMARK INFRINGMENT

Case 1:07-cv LTS Document 1 Filed 03/15/2007 Page 1 of 20

Case 3:17-cv JCH Document 1 Filed 11/13/17 Page 1 of 12 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT. Case No.

Case 9:13-cv KLR Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/19/2013 Page 1 of 17 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA. Case No.

Case 2:17-cv EJF Document 2 Filed 10/02/17 Page 1 of 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF UTAH CENTRAL DIVISION

Case 1:18-cv Document 1 Filed 01/29/18 Page 1 of 14

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION COMPLAINT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA GAINESVILLE DIVISION

Case 1:16-cv GAO Document 1 Filed 07/29/16 Page 1 of 13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS COMPLAINT AND JURY DEMAND PARTIES

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Case: 1:16-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 12/15/16 Page 1 of 15 PageID #:1

Case 1:18-cv Document 1 Filed 05/22/18 Page 1 of 14 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS COMPLAINT AND JURY DEMAND

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

USDC IN/ND case 2:18-cv JVB-APR document 1 filed 05/16/18 page 1 of 10

Case 2:13-cv RJS Document 2 Filed 03/06/13 Page 1 of 16

Case 0:10-cv MJD-FLN Document 1 Filed 04/06/10 Page 1 of 14 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA. Court File No.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) COMPLAINT (Jury Trial Demanded)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION

Case 2:12-cv TC Document 2 Filed 12/10/12 Page 1 of 16

Case: 1:16-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 03/07/16 Page 1 of 10 PageID #:1

Case3:15-cv DMR Document1 Filed09/16/15 Page1 of 11

Case 3:18-cv HEH Document 1 Filed 05/30/18 Page 1 of 20 PageID# 1

Case 9:18-cv RLR Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/22/2018 Page 1 of 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.

Case 2:11-cv CEH-DNF Document 1 Filed 07/12/11 Page 1 of 55 PageID 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA FORT MYERS DIVISION

Case 1:14-cv JMS-MJD Document 1 Filed 01/09/14 Page 1 of 8 PageID #: 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, WESTERN DIVISION. Case No. COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES, RESTITUTION AND INJUNCTIVE RELIEF

Case 2:07-cv CM-JPO Document 1 Filed 07/30/2007 Page 1 of 12 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA. Civil Action No. 07-CV-571

Case: 1:18-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 06/08/18 Page 1 of 15 PageID #:1

USDC IN/ND case 1:18-cv document 1 filed 04/09/18 page 1 of 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA FORT WAYNE DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SAN ANTONIO DIVISION

Case 1:15-cv Document 1 Filed 02/27/15 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS. COMPLAINT and Jury Demand

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 1 COMPLAINT

Case 8:18-cv Document 1 Filed 08/07/18 Page 1 of 26 Page ID #:1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA JOHN JOSEPH BENGIS, an individual,

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI SOUTHERN DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION : : : : : : : : : :

Case 3:15-cv AA Document 1 Filed 01/12/15 Page 1 of 17

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

Case 1:13-cv CMA Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 01/30/2013 Page 1 of 17

Case 2:12-cv JCM-VCF Document 1 Filed 11/13/12 Page 1 of 10

Case 1:17-cv AJN Document 1 Filed 11/09/17 Page 1 of 16 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Case 2:18-cv JAD-CWH Document 1 Filed 12/21/18 Page 1 of 17

Case 2:15-cv Document 1 Filed 04/06/15 Page 1 of 14 Page ID #:1

3 James A. McDaniel (Bar No ) 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

Case: 4:16-cv DDN Doc. #: 1 Filed: 07/15/16 Page: 1 of 9 PageID #: 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Case 1:18-cv BLW Document 1 Filed 01/17/18 Page 1 of 10

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA ASHEVILLE DIVISION CIVIL ACTION NO.: 1:16-CV-381 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case 2:18-cv JTM-MBN Document 1 Filed 06/04/18 Page 1 of 22 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA

Case 1:17-cv JCH-JHR Document 17 Filed 03/31/17 Page 1 of 9 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE. No. Plaintiff, Defendants.

Case 1:14-cv RWZ Document 1 Filed 05/08/14 Page 1 of 19 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS

Case 6:13-cv MHS Document 1 Filed 03/01/13 Page 1 of 7 PageID #: 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF UTAH, CENTRAL DIVISION : : : : : : : : : :

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

PlainSite. Legal Document. California Central District Court Case No. 2:16-cv WBS, Inc. v. Stephen Pearcy et al. Document 2.

Case: 1:11-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 08/10/11 Page 1 of 19 PageID #:1

Case: 1:16-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 02/12/16 Page 1 of 16 PageID #:1

Hells Angels Motorcycle Corporation v. Alexander McQueen Trading Limited et al Doc. 1 Dockets.Justia.com

Case 2:17-cv JFW-JC Document 1 Filed 10/13/17 Page 1 of 11 Page ID #:1

THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION

Case 2:14-cv JPM-tmp Document 1 Filed 04/10/14 Page 1 of 10 PageID 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE WESTERN DIVISION

Case 2:13-cv KSH-CLW Document 1 Filed 12/30/13 Page 1 of 31 PageID: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA ASHEVILLE DIVISION CIVIL ACTION NO.: 1:16-CV-165 ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case: 2:17-cv MHW-KAJ Doc #: 1 Filed: 03/23/17 Page: 1 of 15 PAGEID #: 1

Case 2:15-cv Document 1 Filed 09/24/15 Page 1 of 12 Page ID #:1

Case 3:12-cv P Document 1 Filed 06/14/12 Page 1 of 20 PageID 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION COMPLAINT FOR INJUNCTIVE AND OTHER RELIEF INTRODUCTION

Case 1:10-cv JLT Document 1 Filed 01/22/2010 Page 1 of 15 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS

Case 2:10-cv RAJ Document 1 Filed 08/16/10 Page 1 of 8

Case 5:14-cv Document 1 Filed 11/06/14 Page 1 of 12 Page ID #:1

GIBSON LOWRY BURRIS LLP

PlainSite. Legal Document. New York Southern District Court Case No. 1:16-cv Vale v. Cava et al. Document 7. View Document.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE COMPLAINT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION ORIGINAL COMPLAINT

Case 2:33-av Document Filed 09/21/12 Page 1 of 33 PageID: UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

Case 2:10-cv KDE-KWR Document 1 Filed 03/24/10 Page 1 of 16 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

Case 1:11-cv REB Document 1 Filed 12/15/11 Page 1 of 5

Case 1:18-cv WJM-KLM Document 1 Filed 11/07/18 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA CHARLOTTE DIVISION Civil Action No.: 3:17-CV-398.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) COMPLAINT

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) COMPLAINT

Case 1:11-cv JRH -WLB Document 1 Filed 07/21/11 Page 1 of 6

Courthouse News Service

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 11/24/ :27 PM INDEX NO /2015 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 57 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 11/24/2015 EXHIBIT C

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Case 1:17-cv Document 1 Filed 03/01/17 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 13 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA. Plaintiff, for its complaint, by and through its attorney, alleges that:

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN. v. Civil Action No. COMPLAINT

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Case 2:08-cv JAM-DAD Document 220 Filed 07/25/12 Page 1 of 21

Attorneys for Plaintiffs LARRY KING ENTERPRISES, INC. and ORA MEDIA LLC

Transcription:

Case 2:10-cv-02551-SHM-cgc Document 1 Filed 07/29/10 Page 1 of 14 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE WESTERN DIVISION BRAVADO INTERNATIONAL GROUP MERCHANDISING SERVICES, INC., vs. Plaintiff, VARIOUS JOHN DOES, VARIOUS JANE DOES, AND VARIOUS DOE COMPANIES, Defendants. Case No.: Date: July 29, 2010 COMPLAINT Plaintiff BRAVADO INTERNATIONAL GROUP MERCHANDISING SERVICES, INC. ( Plaintiff or BRAVADO ), by and through its attorneys, DICKINSON WRIGHT PLLC, respectfully avers that: BACKGROUND, JURISDICTION AND VENUE 1. This is an action for unfair competition and false descriptions in commerce arising from Defendants illegal and unauthorized sale of certain Justin Bieber related memorabilia, merchandise and apparel, all without license from either the owner of the respective intellectual property or its exclusive merchandising licensees. 2. This Court has exclusive jurisdiction over this action pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1331 and 1338(a) and 15 U.S.C. 1116, 1121, 1125 and 1126. This action arises under the Lanham Trademark Act, codified at 15 U.S.C. 1051, et seq. 3. The threatened and actual violations which form the basis of this action have occurred, or will occur, within the Western District of Tennessee (and other states) and venue is properly placed in this Court under 28 U.S.C. 1400(a), 1391(b) and (c). 1

Case 2:10-cv-02551-SHM-cgc Document 1 Filed 07/29/10 Page 2 of 14 THE PARTIES 4. Plaintiff Bravado is a corporation duly formed and existing under the laws of the State of California with a place of business in the State of New York. By way of a licensing agreement dated as of August 29, 2009 with Bieber Time Touring, LLC ( BTT ), Bravado is the exclusive merchandising agent for the musical artist known as Justin Bieber with respect to marketing any and all categories of merchandise, including without limitation, t-shirts, posters, calendars, lighters, buttons, trading cards, programs, jerseys, sweatshirts, hats, box sets, gift sets, USB drives, headwear, and any other wearing apparel bearing the Justin Bieber name, artwork, logos, and/or likeness at concert engagements throughout the United States. A true and accurate copy of the Bravado/BTT Merchandising Agreement (redacted to protect certain limited proprietary business information) is attached hereto as Exhibit A. 5. Upon information and belief, Defendants Various John Does and Various Jane Does are residents of, or transact and do business and will be present in Memphis, Tennessee on and before July 31, 2010, or are now conspiring to and otherwise traveling to the other states listed in Schedule A annexed hereto and are subject to the jurisdiction of this Court. The identities of the Various John Does and Various Jane Does are not presently known and the Complaint will be amended to include the name or names of said individuals if and when they permit themselves to be identified. 6. Upon information and belief, Defendants Doe Companies through their agents, servants and employees transact and do business in and will be present in Memphis, Tennessee on and before July 31, 2010, and are traveling to or are now conspiring to travel to other states listed in Schedule A annexed hereto and are subject to the jurisdiction of this Court. The identities of the Doe Companies are not 2

Case 2:10-cv-02551-SHM-cgc Document 1 Filed 07/29/10 Page 3 of 14 presently known and the Complaint will be amended to include the names of said companies if and when they permit themselves to be identified. 7. The musical artist Justin Bieber has used his individual name, logos, artwork and likeness to identify himself in all phases of the entertainment industry and to distinguish himself from other professional entertainment performers. GENERAL ALLEGATIONS 8. Justin Bieber is currently embarked on a major multi-city concert tour of the United States (and Canada) and will perform in Memphis, Tennessee, on July 31, 2010. Justin Bieber s tour has come to be known as the XBOX360 presents Justin Bieber My World Tour (hereinafter XBOX360 Tour or the Tour ). The seventysix (76) city XBOX360 Tour itinerary is annexed hereto as Schedule A. 9. Defendants are numerous independent unlicensed peddlers and numerous manufacturing and distribution companies who will be attempting to distribute and sell unauthorized bootleg and inferior merchandise embodying Justin Bieber s name, logos and/or likeness and/or replicas of the artwork embodied on the covers of Justin Bieber s recordings, and merchandise which embodies his logo or artwork (collectively, the Bootleg Merchandise ) including, without limitation, all wearing apparel, t-shirts, posters, photos, calendars and headwear, outside the FedEx in Memphis, Tennessee on July 31, 2010, and at the XBOX360 Tour s other concert locations, a list of which is annexed as Schedule A hereto, all in violation of the rights of Plaintiff under the Lanham Act. The identities of these Defendants are not presently known and cannot be known unless they voluntarily permit themselves to be identified. 10. Plaintiff, an experienced merchandising agent, can state with certainty that Defendants will attempt to sell imitation and inferior Bootleg Merchandise outside the venues where Justin Bieber is scheduled to appear on the XBOX360 Tour. In fact, the sale of Bootleg Merchandise has occurred at or within the vicinity of 3

Case 2:10-cv-02551-SHM-cgc Document 1 Filed 07/29/10 Page 4 of 14 previous concert venues on the XBOX 360 Tour as well as each concert venue that has been part of Justin Bieber s previous concert tours. 11. The sale of the Bootleg Merchandise by Defendants is and will be without Bravado s permission, license, or authority. 12. The unlawful distribution of Bootleg Merchandise results in irreparable harm and injury to Bravado in that, among other things it deprives Bravado of its absolute right to determine the manner in which Justin Bieber s name, logos, artwork and likeness is presented to the public through merchandising; deceives the public as to the origin and sponsorship of such merchandise; wrongfully trades upon and benefits monetarily on Justin Bieber s and Plaintiff s reputations, commercial value and exclusive rights in their intellectual property; and it irreparably harms and injures the reputation of Bravado. AS AND FOR A FIRST CAUSE OF ACTION Violation of 15 U.S.C. 1125(a) 13. Plaintiff repeats and realleges paragraphs 1 through 12 of the Complaint as if more fully set forth herein. 14. This cause of action arises under Section 43(a) of the Lanham Act relating to trademarks, trade names and unfair competition entitled, False Designation of Origin and False Descriptions Forbidden, 15 U.S.C. 1125(a), and involves false descriptions in commerce. 15. The name, artwork, logos and likeness of Justin Bieber have been used widely throughout the United States. As a result of same, said name, artwork, logos and likeness have developed and now have a secondary meaning to purchasers of goods and merchandise including, but not limited to, t-shirts, posters, calendars and headwear. 16. The Bootleg Merchandise sold by the various Defendants, which contains the intellectual property (name, logos, and/or likeness) of Justin Bieber and/or replicas 4

Case 2:10-cv-02551-SHM-cgc Document 1 Filed 07/29/10 Page 5 of 14 of the artwork embodied on the jackets and/or covers of Justin Bieber s recordings, is of the same general nature and type as the merchandise sold and/or authorized to be sold exclusively by Plaintiff at concerts throughout the United States. 17. The various Defendants, by misappropriating and using Justin Bieber s name, likeness, logos, and artwork have misrepresented and falsely described to the public the origin and source of the Bootleg Merchandise so as to create the likelihood of confusion by the purchaser/consumer as to both the source and sponsorship of the Bootleg Merchandise sold at or within one (1) mile of XBOX360 Tour concert venues identified on Schedule A. 18. The aforementioned Bootleg Merchandise is in most cases inferior quality and the sale thereof will be damaging to and will dilute the goodwill generated by Justin Bieber and the reputation that Bravado has developed in connection with the sale of legitimate, licensed and quality merchandise. 19. All of Defendants unlawful merchandising activities have been and will be conducted without the permission, license or authority of Bravado. Defendants actions constitute express and implied misrepresentations that the Bootleg Merchandise was created, authorized and approved by Bravado. The various Defendants have not secured any license, authority or approval to manufacture, distribute or sell such Bootleg Merchandise. 20. Defendants actions are in violation of 15 U.S.C. 1125(a) in that Defendants will use, in connection with goods and services, a false designation of origin and have caused and will continue to cause said Bootleg Merchandise to enter into interstate commerce. 21. Plaintiff has no adequate remedy at law. 22. If Defendants unlawful activities are not enjoined, Bravado will suffer irreparable harm and injury to its images and reputations including, but not limited to (1) depriving Bravado of the right to determine the manner in which its images are presented to the general public through merchandising; (2) deceiving the public as to 5

Case 2:10-cv-02551-SHM-cgc Document 1 Filed 07/29/10 Page 6 of 14 the origin and sponsorship of such merchandise; (3) wrongfully trading upon Bravado s reputation, commercial value, and exclusive rights; and (4) manufacturing, distributing, and selling merchandise of inferior quality. WHEREFORE, Plaintiff respectfully prays that this court grant the following relief: A. The Court issue a Temporary Restraining Order and a Preliminary Injunction restraining, enjoining and prohibiting each of the Defendants (individually and/or collectively) their agents, servants, employees, officers, attorneys, successors and assigns, and all persons aiding and abetting, acting under Defendants, on their behalf, or in concert with them from manufacturing, distributing, selling, offering for sale, holding for sale, or advertising any and all merchandise bearing the names, Plaintiff, and/or any colorable variation thereof, and from representing that any article of merchandise manufactured, distributed, sold, held for sale or advertised by Defendants is sponsored or authorized by Plaintiff; B. The Court order the United States Marshal(s), state, county, and/or local law enforcement authorities, and Bravado, Btt, Alan Rebhun (Tour Director) and/or their agents, employees or designees to seize and impound any and all of the illegitimate merchandise that infringes upon Plaintiff s rights as intellectual property owner and/or exclusive licensee of BTT and Justin Bieber, which Defendants attempt to sell, distribute, advertise, hold for sale, or offer for sale outside of the venues, within the confines of the venues, and/or within one (1) mile of the venue at which a XBOX360 Tour concert is located; C. That after a hearing on the merits, this Court issue a Preliminary, National, Multi-District Tour Injunction and Order of Seizure restraining Defendants and others referred to hereinabove from manufacturing, distributing, selling, offering for sale, holding for sale, or advertising any and all merchandise bearing the names, 6

Case 2:10-cv-02551-SHM-cgc Document 1 Filed 07/29/10 Page 7 of 14 Plaintiff, and/or any colorable variation thereof; D. The Court issue a Permanent Injunction prohibiting Defendants (individually and/or collectively) from manufacturing, distributing, selling, offering for sale, holding for sale, or advertising any and all merchandise bearing the names, Plaintiff, and/or any colorable variation thereof, and ordering the seizure and destruction of all such merchandise wherever found; and E. For such other, further and different relief which this Court deems reasonable, necessary and just. AS AND FOR A SECOND CAUSE OF ACTION State Common Law Claims for Unfair Competition 23. Plaintiff repeats and realleges paragraphs 1 through 22 of the Complaint as if more fully set forth herein. 24. The aforesaid acts of Defendants have been and will be committed willfully and with full knowledge of the rights of Plaintiff with the intention of deceiving and misleading the public and of wrongfully misappropriating and trading upon the nationally recognized value of the goodwill and reputation inherent in Justin Bieber s name and likeness, and of benefiting from and depriving Plaintiff of the benefits thereof, and of diverting from Plaintiff to Defendants the benefits arising from the goodwill associated with Justin Bieber, BTT and Plaintiff. 25. Defendants misappropriation of Justin Bieber s name and likeness will interfere with Bravado s ability to exploit the commercial value of said name and likeness. 26. Defendants will receive competitive economic advantage in that Defendants will benefit from the skill, labor, and expenditures of Justin Bieber, BTT, and Plaintiff by misappropriating Justin Bieber s name and likeness without negotiating for and paying the market rate. 7

Case 2:10-cv-02551-SHM-cgc Document 1 Filed 07/29/10 Page 8 of 14 27. Defendants will receive substantial profits from their unauthorized use and misappropriation of Justin Bieber s name and likeness, and Defendants will become unjustly enriched thereby. Because Defendants act without Bravado s consent, Defendants willful and unauthorized misappropriation of the aforementioned name and likeness, and of Bravado s reputation and goodwill, will cause substantial and irreparable injury and loss to Bravado unless Defendants are immediately and permanently restrained and enjoined from committing the aforementioned acts and the infringing goods are seized. WHEREFORE, Plaintiff respectfully prays that this court grant the following relief: A. The Court issue a Temporary Restraining Order and a Preliminary Injunction restraining, enjoining and prohibiting each of the Defendants (individually and/or collectively) their agents, servants, employees, officers, attorneys, successors and assigns, and all persons aiding and abetting, acting under Defendants, on their behalf, or in concert with them from manufacturing, distributing, selling, offering for sale, holding for sale, or advertising any and all merchandise bearing the names, Plaintiff, and/or any colorable variation thereof, and from representing that any article of merchandise manufactured, distributed, sold, held for sale or advertised by Defendants is sponsored or authorized by Plaintiff; B. The Court order the United States Marshal(s), state, county, and/or local law enforcement authorities, and Bravado, Btt, Alan Rebhun (Tour Director) and/or their agents, employees or designees to seize and impound any and all of the illegitimate merchandise that infringes upon Plaintiff s rights as intellectual property owner and/or exclusive licensee of BTT and Justin Bieber, which Defendants attempt to sell, distribute, advertise, hold for sale, or offer for sale outside of the venues, within the confines of the venues, and/or within one (1) mile of the venue at which a XBOX360 Tour concert is located; 8

Case 2:10-cv-02551-SHM-cgc Document 1 Filed 07/29/10 Page 9 of 14 C. That after a hearing on the merits, this Court issue a Preliminary, National, Multi-District Tour Injunction and Order of Seizure restraining Defendants and others referred to herein above from manufacturing, distributing, selling, offering for sale, holding for sale, or advertising any and all merchandise bearing the names, Plaintiff, and/or any colorable variation thereof; D. The Court issue a Permanent Injunction prohibiting Defendants (individually and/or collectively) from manufacturing, distributing, selling, offering for sale, holding for sale, or advertising any and all merchandise bearing the names, Plaintiff, and/or any colorable variation thereof, and ordering the seizure and destruction of all such merchandise wherever found; and e. For such other, further and different relief which this Court deems reasonable, necessary and just. AS AND FOR A THIRD CAUSE OF ACTION State Common Law Claims for Violation of Right of Publicity 28. Plaintiff repeats and realleges paragraphs 1 through 27 of the Complaint as if more fully set forth herein. 29. Due to the investment of substantial money, time and energy in advertising, publicizing and promoting the accomplishments, abilities and popularity of Justin Bieber, Justin Bieber has developed and now possesses the right of publicity to protect the commercial use of his name, likeness or other indicia of his identity, including, but not limited to, images, logos and artwork. 30. Justin Bieber and BTT, has licensed and authorized Bravado to use the name and likeness of Justin Bieber in the commercial setting for the purposes of marketing and selling, without limitation, t-shirts, posters, calendars and headwear bearing Justin Bieber s name, likeness, image, logos and artwork in connection with the XBOX360 Tour and otherwise. 9

Case 2:10-cv-02551-SHM-cgc Document 1 Filed 07/29/10 Page 10 of 14 31. The aforesaid acts of Defendants are not authorized by Justin Bieber or BTT, and have been and will be committed willfully and with full knowledge of the rights of Plaintiff with the intention of obtaining a commercial advantage by trading upon the nationally recognized value of the goodwill and reputation inherent in Justin Bieber s name and likeness. 32. The aforesaid acts of Defendants have been and will be committed intentionally for the purposes of appropriating to Defendants benefit the commercial or other values associated with the name of likeness of Justin Bieber. 33. The misuse of the name and likeness of Justin Bieber by Defendants constitutes an intentional violation of Plaintiff s rights in and to the name, likeness, logos and artwork of Justin Bieber, and has caused and will continue to cause pecuniary loss to Plaintiff and unjust pecuniary gain to Defendants unless Defendants are immediately restrained and enjoined from committing the aforementioned acts and the infringing goods are seized. WHEREFORE, Plaintiff respectfully prays that this court grant the following relief: A. The Court issue a Temporary Restraining Order and a Preliminary Injunction restraining, enjoining and prohibiting each of the Defendants (individually and/or collectively) their agents, servants, employees, officers, attorneys, successors and assigns, and all persons aiding and abetting, acting under Defendants, on their behalf, or in concert with them from manufacturing, distributing, selling, offering for sale, holding for sale, or advertising any and all merchandise bearing the names, Plaintiff, and/or any colorable variation thereof, and from representing that any article of merchandise manufactured, distributed, sold, held for sale or advertised by Defendants is sponsored or authorized by Plaintiff; B. The Court order the United States Marshal(s), state, county, and/or local law enforcement authorities, and Bravado, Btt, Alan Rebhun (Tour Director) and/or their agents, employees or designees to seize and impound any and all of the 10

Case 2:10-cv-02551-SHM-cgc Document 1 Filed 07/29/10 Page 11 of 14 illegitimate merchandise that infringes upon Plaintiff s rights as intellectual property owner and/or exclusive licensee of BTT and Justin Bieber, which Defendants attempt to sell, distribute, advertise, hold for sale, or offer for sale outside of the venues, within the confines of the venues, and/or within one (1) mile of the venue at which a XBOX360 Tour concert is located; C. That after a hearing on the merits, this Court issue a Preliminary, Nationa, Multi-District Tour Injunction and Order of Seizure restraining Defendants and others referred to herein above from manufacturing, distributing, selling, offering for sale, holding for sale, or advertising any and all merchandise bearing the names, Plaintiff, and/or any colorable variation thereof; D. The Court issue a Permanent Injunction prohibiting Defendants (individually and/or collectively) from manufacturing, distributing, selling, offering for sale, holding for sale, or advertising any and all merchandise bearing the names, Plaintiff, and/or any colorable variation thereof, and ordering the seizure and destruction of all such merchandise wherever found; and E. For such other, further and different relief which this Court deems reasonable, necessary and just. AS AND FOR A FOURTH CAUSE OF ACTION State Common Law Claims for Intentional Tortious Interference with Existing and Prospective Contractual Relations 34. Plaintiff repeats and realleges paragraphs 1 through 33 of the Complaint as if more fully set forth herein. 35. Defendants aforementioned intentional, unauthorized, and unlawful activities will wrongfully impair the value of Bravado s merchandising license contract, as well as the contractual arrangements between Bravado and the facility 11

Case 2:10-cv-02551-SHM-cgc Document 1 Filed 07/29/10 Page 12 of 14 concessionaires, relating to the sale of merchandise bearing Justin Bieber s name, likeness, logos and artwork. 36. By reason of Defendants acts alleged herein, Plaintiff is threatened to suffer actual damage to its business reputation and goodwill, and the loss of sales and profits Plaintiff would have made but for Defendants unauthorized and illegal acts. 37. Unless Defendants acts of misappropriation and unfair competition are immediately restrained and enjoined, and the infringing goods seized, Plaintiff will suffer irreparable injury and pecuniary loss because Defendants acts will: a) interfere with Plaintiff s ability to exploit, market, and license the name, likeness, logos and artwork of Justin Bieber by sales to consumers; b) lessen the value of the name, likeness, and rights of publicity of Justin Bieber; c) create confusion in the marketplace as to the duly authorized source of such merchandise; and d) deprive Plaintiff of its just revenues based its authorized exploitation of Justin Bieber s name, likeness, and rights of publicity. WHEREFORE, Plaintiff respectfully prays that this Court grant the following relief: 1. The Court issue a Temporary Restraining Order and a (National) Preliminary Injunction restraining, enjoining and prohibiting each of the Defendants (individually and/or collectively) their agents, servants, employees, officers, attorneys, successors and assigns, and all persons aiding and abetting, acting under Defendants, on their behalf, or in concert with them from manufacturing, distributing, selling, offering for sale, holding for sale, or advertising any and all merchandise bearing the name, likeness, logos, and/or artwork of Justin Bieber, licensed to Plaintiff, and/or any colorable variation thereof, and from representing that any article of merchandise manufactured, distributed, sold, held for sale or advertised by Defendants is sponsored or authorized by Plaintiff; 12

Case 2:10-cv-02551-SHM-cgc Document 1 Filed 07/29/10 Page 13 of 14 2. The Court order the United States Marshal(s), state, county, and/or local law enforcement authorities as contracted by Bravado for the purposes of bootleg enforcement, Bravado s Tour Director Alan Rebhun and/or his agents, employees or designees to seize and impound any and all of the illegitimate merchandise that infringes upon Plaintiff s rights as intellectual property owner and/or exclusive licensee of Justin Bieber, which Defendants attempt to sell, distribute, advertise, hold for sale, or offer for sale (and the containers, vessels, automobiles, trucks, vans and the like, in which such merchandise is stored and/or carried) outside of the venues, within the confines of the venues, and/or within one (1) mile of the venue at which Justin Bieber is performing before, during or after the XBOX360 Tour concert dates; 3. That after a hearing on the merits, this Court issue a Preliminary, National, Multi-District Tour Injunction and Order of Seizure restraining Defendants and others referred to herein above from manufacturing, distributing, selling, offering for sale, holding for sale, or advertising any and all merchandise bearing the name, likeness, logos, and/or artwork of Justin Bieber, licensed to Plaintiff, and/or any colorable variation thereof; 4. The Court issue a Permanent Injunction prohibiting Defendants (individually and/or collectively) from manufacturing, distributing, selling, offering for sale, holding for sale, or advertising any and all merchandise bearing the name, likeness, logos, and/or artwork of Justin Bieber, licensed to Plaintiff, and/or any colorable variation thereof, and ordering the seizure and destruction of all such merchandise wherever found; and 5. For such other, further and different relief which this Court deems reasonable, necessary and just. 13

Case 2:10-cv-02551-SHM-cgc Document 1 Filed 07/29/10 Page 14 of 14 DATED: July 29, 2010 Respectfully submitted by: DICKINSON WRIGHT PLLC By: s/philip M. Kirkpatrick Philip M. Kirkpatrick, BPR No. 6161 424 Church Street, Suite 1401 Nashville, TN 37219 (615) 244-6538 (phone) (615) 620-1716 (direct dial) (615) 256-8386 (fax) E-mail: pkirkpatrick@dickinsonwright.com AND Of counsel: ABRAMS, FENSTERMAN, FENSTERMAN, EISMAN, GREENBERG, FORMATO & EINIGER, LLP By: s/brian A. Bloom _ Brian A. Bloom Pro Hac Vice Application To Be Filed and Pending on July 30, 2010 630 Third Avenue, 6 th fl. New York, NY 10017 Telephone: 212.279.9200 Facsimile: 516.368.9537 E-mail: bbloom@abramslaw.com Attorneys for Plaintiff BRAVADO INTERNATIONAL GROUP MERCHANDISING SERVICES, INC. 14