FAREWELL SPEECH ON THE RETIREMENT OF HON BLE MR. JUSTICE V.K. JAIN DELIVERED ON G. ROHINI CHIEF JUSTICE

Similar documents
Shri Rajeev Khosla, President, Delhi High Court Bar Association, Shri Jatan Singh, Vice-President, Delhi High Court Bar Association,

FAREWELL SPEECH ON THE RETIREMENT OF JUSTICE INDERMEET KAUR KOCHHAR

FAREWELL SPEECH ON THE RETIREMENT OF HON BLE MS. JUSTICE SUNITA GUPTA DELIVERED ON G. ROHINI CHIEF JUSTICE

FAREWELL SPEECH ON THE TRANSFER OF JUSTICE ASHUTOSH KUMAR TO THE HIGH COURT OF PATNA

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : RECRUITMENT MATTER. W.P.(C) No. 8347/2010. Date of Decision: Versus

$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. versus. % Date of Decision: 9 th February, J U D G M E N T

FAREWELL SPEECH ON THE RETIREMENT OF JUSTICE DEEPA SHARMA

The Report Of Transplant of Human Organs Act Review Committee

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : NEGOTIABLE INSTRUMENTS ACT. Date of Decision: CRL.A of 2013.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : INDIAN EVIDENCE ACT, 1872 C.R.P. 589/1998. Date of Decision: 6th March, 2009

FAREWELL SPEECH DELIVERED BY JUSTICE GITA MITTAL IN THE FULL COURT REFERENCE ON THE RETIREMENT OF JUSTICE G. ROHINI, CJ

*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. % Date of decision: 29 th March, LPA No.777/2010

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : DELHI WATER BOARD ACT, Date of decision: 4th February, 2011.

Reserved on: 7 th August, Pronounced on: 13 th August, # SAIL EX-EMPLOYEES ASSOCIATION...Petitioner

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. % Date of Decision: Through: Mr. P. Kalra, Advocate. Versus. Through: Mr. R.V.

Through: Mr. Sandeep Sethi, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Gurpreet Singh, Mr. Nitish Jain & Mr. Jatin Sethi, Advs. Versus

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. + W.P. (C.) No /2009 & CM. No.15749/2009. Date of Decision :

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 7262/2014

$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. Judgment delivered on: December 11, 2014

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : THE ARCHITECTS ACT, 1972 Date of decision: 4th January, 2012 WP(C) NO.8653/2008

WP(C) No.810/2015 BEFORE HON BLE MR. JUSTICE UJJAL BHUYAN

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI : NEW DELHI SUBJECT : CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE. W.P. Crl. No. 1029/2010. Decided on: 9th August, 2011.

RESPONDENTS. Article 14 read with Article 19 (1) G. Article 246 read with entry 77 list 1, 7 th schedule.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE. Reserved on: 5th August, Date of decision: 19th September, 2011

% W.P.(C) No. 5513/2004

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

BEFORE THE NATIONAL GREEN TRIBUNAL EASTERN ZONE BENCH, KOLKATA THE CHAIRMAN POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI

Recruitment to posts shall be made by any one of the following modes:

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : CODE OF CRIMINA PROCEDURE. CRL.REV.P. 523/2009 & Crl. M.A. No /2009(Stay)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : SERVICE MATTER. Reserved on: Date of decision:

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : APPOINTMENT MATTER Date of decision: 11th July, 2012 W.P.(C) No.1343/1998.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : SERVICE MATTER Judgment pronounced on: W.P.(C) 393/2012

PUBLIC NOTICE. Rule Name of post Main amendment in the existing RR

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. CRL M C 656/2005 and CRL M A 2217/2005. Reserved on: January 17, Date of decision: February 8, 2008

GOVERNMENT OF INDIA LAW COMMISSION OF INDIA AMENDMENT OF CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE ENABLING RESTORATION OF COMPLAINTS. Report No.

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. + W.P.(C) 6675/2015 & CM No.12175/2015. HARISH C. RAI... Petitioner Mr.Ankur Chhibber, Adv.

Reserved on: 3 rd February, 2010 Pronounced on: 4 th February, 2010

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE Judgment delivered on: CS(OS) 2248/2011

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : SUIT FOR DECLARATION. RFA Nos. 601/2007 and 606/2007. DATE OF DECISION 10th February, 2012.

A.F.R. ***** This petition has been filed with the following prayers:-

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : SERVICE MATTER W.P.(C) No. 3094/2010 DATE OF DECISION : 2nd September, 2013

+ W.P.(C) 7127/2015, CM APPL. No /2015

M/S. SAIPEM TRIUNE ENGINEERING PVT. LTD. Plaintiff. - versus - INDIAN OIL PETRONAS PVT. LTD.

Criminal Revn No. 4(SH) of 2009.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE. Crl.M.C. 638/2009 & Crl.M.A.2384/09 (stay) Date of reserve:

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE Date of Judgment: FAO (OS) 298/2010

NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, NEW DELHI

COURT NO. I ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL PRINCIPAL BENCH, NEW DELHI M.A NO OF 2018 & M.A NO OF 2018 IN O.A NO OF 2018

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : LAND ACQUISITION ACT DECIDED ON: W.P. (C) 4439/2013

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) NO. 184 OF

THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. % Judgment delivered on: M/S MITSUBISHI CORPORATION INDIA P. LTD Petitioner.

* HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. versus

BEFORE THE NATIONAL GREEN TRIBUNAL, PRINCIPAL BENCH, NEW DELHI. Application No. 06 of Manoj Mishra Vs. Union of India & Ors.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE. I.A. No.1167/2007 in CS(OS) No.2128/2006. Judgment Reserved on:

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : COMPETITION ACT, Judgment reserved on: Judgment delivered on:

Through: Versus. Through: 2. To be referred to the reporter or not? Yes. 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?

K.K. MISHRA.APPELLANT(S) VERSUS JUDGMENT. 2. By the order impugned, the High Court. of Madhya Pradesh has negatived the challenge

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : SUIT FOR SPECIFIC PERFORMANCE

HIGH COURT OF DELHI : NEW DELHI NOTIFICATION. No. 431/Rules/DHC Dated :

*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. % Date of decision: 15 th January, W.P.(C) No.3687/1995

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : SUIT FOR POSSESSION. Judgment Reserved on: Judgment Pronounced on:

Through: Mr. Himansu Upadhyay, Mr. J.P. Sahrawat and Mr. Shivam Tripathi, Advs. CORAM: HON BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KAIT

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : SERVICE MATTER W.P.(C) No.7886/2011 DATE OF DECISION : 15th July, 2013

$~39 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. % Judgment delivered on: Versus

IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (THE HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) WP(C) 2098 of 2013

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : INDIAN COMPANIES ACT, 1956 Date of Judgment on: CRL.REV.P. 103/2014

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : LAND ACQUISITION ACT, Date of decision: WP(C) No. 3595/2011 and CM Nos.

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : SUIT FOR POSSESSION. Date of Decision: W.P.(C) 7097/2010

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : CONDONATION OF DELAY. W.P (C ) No /2006. Judgment reserved on: October 19, 2006

THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. % Judgment Reserved on: Judgment Pronounced on: versus -

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P. (L) No of 2013

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : PUBLIC PREMISES (EVICTION OF UNAUTHORIZED OCCUPANTS) ACT, Date of decision: 8th February, 2012

IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (The High Court of Assam, Nagaland, Mizoram and Arunachal Pradesh) Small Industries Development Bank of India ( SIDBI)

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. + CCP(O) No. 120/2005 in OMP No. 342/2004. NATIONAL HIGHWAYS AUTHORITY INDIA (NHAI)... Petitioner.

$~49 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: July 24, W.P.(C) 7444/2018, C.M. APPL. No /2018

IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT ( THE HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH ) WP(C) No of Versus-

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA Page 1 of 10 PETITIONER: VISHAKA & ORS.

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. Judgment Reserved on: August 02, 2016 % Judgment Delivered on: August 08, W.P.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. SUBJECT : Delhi Land Revenue Act REVIEW PETITIONS 205, 209/2007

ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, LUCKNOW. M.A. No.709 of 2015 with M.A. No of 2015 Inre O.A. No. Nil of 2015

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNALS ACT, 1985 Date of decision: 15th February, 2012 W.P.(C) No.

$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. Judgement delivered on: 12 th January, W.P.(C) 7068/2014

OFFENCES UNDER PITA COMPULSORILY INVESTIGATED BY SPECIAL POLICE OFFICER

$~19 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on: 30 th July, CRL.M.C. No.2836/2015. Versus

STANDING ORDER NO. 330/2008

HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH : JABALPUR. W.P. No.750/2017. Bar Association Lahar, Dist. Bhind -Versus- State Bar Council of M.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : PREVENTION OF CORRUPTION ACT. Crl. M.C. No. 2183/2011. Reserved on: 18th January, 2012

IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (THE HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM & ARUNACHAL PRADESH) WRIT APPEAL NO.322 OF 2015

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. + CRL.M.C. 4966/2014 & Crl. M.A /2014. Versus

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 6105/2011. % SADHNA BHARDWAJ.. Petitioner Through: Mr. Dipak Bhattarcharya, Adv.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. SUBJECT : Code of Criminal Procedure, CRIMINAL M C No 5094 of 2006 and Crl M A 1088/2002

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION TRANSFERRED CASE (CIVIL) NO(S). 11 OF Versus

BEFORE THE NATIONAL GREEN TRIBUNAL CENTRAL ZONAL BENCH BHOPAL. Original Application No. 129/2013 (CZ)

THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. % Judgment Pronounced on: versus -...Respondent

$~9. * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. % RSA 228/2015 and C.M. No.12883/2015. versus CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI W.P.(C) No. 422 of 2010 C.R.PARK M, N & P BLOCKS RESIDENTS WELFARE

*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

Order Delhi State Association Page 1 of 8

Transcription:

FAREWELL SPEECH ON THE RETIREMENT OF HON BLE MR. JUSTICE V.K. JAIN DELIVERED ON 13.05.2014 G. ROHINI CHIEF JUSTICE Justice V.K. Jain, My esteemed brother and sister colleagues, Shri Rajeev Khosla, President, Delhi High Court Bar Association, Shri Rajeeve Mehra, Additional Solicitor General, Shri Sidharth Luthra, Additional Solicitor General, Shri Ram Singh Chauhan, Chairman, Bar Council of Delhi, Shri Murari Tiwari, Hony. Secretary, Bar Council of Delhi, Shri Jatan Singh, Vice-President, Delhi High Court Bar Association, Shri Abhijat, Hony. Secretary, Delhi High Court Bar Association, Ms. Zubeda Begum, Standing Counsel (Civil), Govt. of NCT of Delhi Shri Salim Ahmed, Standing Counsel (Criminal), Govt. of NCT of Delhi Other Standing Counsel of the Central and State Government, Executive Members of the Delhi High Court Bar Association, Office-bearers of other District Bar Associations, Senior Advocates, Members of the Bar, District & Sessions Judges, Law Secretary, Family members of Justice Jain, and Ladies and gentlemen. Page 1 of 7

One of our dear colleagues Justice V.K. Jain is demitting office today after extraordinary service to this High Court for 5 years. In less than a month, this is the second time we are assembling here to bid farewell to another beloved Judge of this Court. Though I have had limited interaction with Justice Jain, I have observed that he is an extremely gifted person and is somebody who copes very well in any kind of situation. During his five years in the High Court and otherwise in his career as a judge, Justice Jain has distinguished himself as an extraordinary judge. He started on this path by topping the Judicial Services Exam in 1977. Since then he has distinguished himself in various positions as a judge, and worked as an Additional District and Sessions Judge, Designated Judge under TADA Act and also as a Special Judge (CBI). As a judge, deciding a case is never easy. Law being extremely subjective a judge has to take all the social realities into account and decide with compassion. At the same time he cannot let go of the provisions of the law. Page 2 of 7

This fine line is something which cannot be forgotten and Justice Jain has time and again proved his understanding of this principle and proven himself more than capable of delivering a judgment grounded in justified legal principles while yet not leaving out the compassionate facet of his personality. In the course of his judicial career so far, Justice Jain has delivered numerous landmark judgments and decisions in many areas of law. In Mrs. Savita Bhanot vs. Lt. Col. V.D. Bhanot, {2010 (168) DLT 68}, Justice Jain held that there can be no reasonable classification based upon intelligible differentia between the woman subjected to domestic violence and living with her husband on the date of coming into force of the Domestic Violence Act or subjected to domestic violence after coming into force of the Act on the one hand and the women who were living with their husbands or were subjected to domestic violence prior to coming into force of the Act on the other hand. This judgment was later upheld by the supreme court in V.D. Bhanot vs. Savita Bhanot (2013) 3 SCC 183. Page 3 of 7

In Smt. Rajput and Anr. Vs. Guru Gobind Singh Indraprastha University and Ors., Justice Jain held that 50% of the total seats for PG medical Course available in I.P. University under the State quota have to be filled up purely on the basis of the ranks obtained by the candidates irrespective of whether they passed their qualifying examination from Delhi University or from I.P. University and the aforesaid direction would apply to reserved as well as unreserved seats. In another case in Jyoti Rani vs Guru Gobind Singh Indraprastha University and Another, Justice Jain held that If a candidate seeking admission to an educational institution, who belongs to a Scheduled Caste notified in State A migrates to State B where the caste to which he belongs has been notified as Scheduled Caste with the same nomenclature, he is entitled to reservation benefit provided to the said caste in State B. Page 4 of 7

He further held that if such a candidate is permanently residing in Delhi, he would be entitled to such a benefit even if his ancestors had migrated to Delhi from another State provided that they had migrated to Delhi with no intention to return back to the State from which they had migrated. In Samta Andolan Samiti and Anr. Vs Union of India and Ors., Justice Jain, sitting with the then Chief Justice held, inter alia, that the political parties are not State within the meaning of Article 12 of the Constitution or authority within the meaning of Article 226 of the Constitution and such parties neither perform any sovereign functions nor discharge any public duties while issuing whips to their members. In All India Confederation of Blind vs Union of India and Another, Justice Jain directed DDA and the Delhi Govt. to frame, within three months, appropriate schemes for the preferential land at concessional rates to the persons with disabilities, for the purpose of setting up special recreation centers and establishment of special schools and special centres and factories. Page 5 of 7

It is clear from the judgments of Justice Jain that he is not only cognizant of the social realities of the world we live in but also is extremely gifted in the application of law, both in letter and in spirit. It would not be out of place to mention that Justice Jain has been an active Member of the Computer Committee of Delhi High Court from 27.03.2010 till date and has rendered valuable contribution in resolving issues relating to computerization and digitization of old records, which not only provided valuable vacant space but also improved the working conditions in the High Court. I thank Justice Jain for his distinguished service as a Judge of this court, which has left a huge impression on all those who interacted with him, during his tenure as a judge of this High Court, and also thank him for his amazing work ethic and his dedication to dispense justice. This Court will always remember the remarkable and quietly efficient way in which Justice Jain has discharged his duties as a judge and his contributions to this court. Page 6 of 7

I on my behalf and on behalf of my brother and sister colleagues thank Justice Jain for his illustrious service as a judge of this court and wish him all the luck in any and all of his future endeavours. Thank you. Page 7 of 7