MIP International Patent Forum 2013 Russia Focus

Similar documents
Litigation Strategies in Europe MIP Global IP & Innovation Summit

Law Introducing Rules for Localization of Personal Data of Russian Citizens

Fact or Fiction? U.S. Government Surveillance in a Post-Snowden World

Patent Litigation in China & Amicus Curiae in the U.S. William (Skip) Fisher Partner, Shanghai. EPLAW Congress, 22 November 2013

Damages United Kingdom perspective

AIPLA Overview of recent developments in Community trade mark law

China's New Exit-Entry Law Targets Illegal Foreigners July 2012

Indemnities, Disclaimers and Constitution

Challenging Government decisions in the UK. An introduction to judicial review

Risk and Return. Foreign Direct Investment and the Rule of Law. Briefing Note

Judicial Review. Where do we stand? Will proposals for further judicial review reform make any difference? Procedure & Practice

EEA and Swiss national. Children and their rights to British citizenship

What You Need To Know About The Rise Of Civil Litigation By State Attorneys General

Possible models for the UK/EU relationship

Private action for contempt of court?

Jurisdiction and Governing Law Rules in the European Union

Seminar for HKIS on: "Non-Payment and Termination of Contracts"

Damages in Judicial Review: The Commercial Context

Settlement Offers under Part 36 of the Civil Procedure Rules

Alternative Dispute Resolution in England and Wales

Sovereign Immunity. Key points for commercial parties July allenovery.com

Disclosure of documents in civil proceedings in England and Wales

UPC Alert. March 2014 SPEED READ

2. PROPOSED MODIFICATIONS TO THE PROCEDURAL REGULATION ARTICLE

Jackson reforms to civil litigation

Latham & Watkins Environment, Land & Resources Department

American Academy for Pediatric Dentistry

Delaware Bankruptcy Court Confirms Lock-Up Agreements Are a Valuable Tool Not a Violation of the Bankruptcy Code

Enforcing International Arbitral Awards in the UAE and The DIFC Courts: A conduit jurisdiction

Latham & Watkins Litigation Department

Freedom of Information Act Request: Mobile Biometric Devices and Applications

Who can create jobs in america? The American Worker Perspective on U.S. Job Creation

Principles of Federal Prosecution of Business Organizations

Latham & Watkins Litigation Department

Case3:12-mc CRB Document88 Filed10/04/13 Page1 of 5. October 4, Chevron v. Donziger, 12-mc CRB (NC) Motion to Compel

For the purpose of this opinion, we have assumed the following:

Sarepta Therapeutics, Inc. (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 11/17/ :03 PM INDEX NO /2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 57 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 11/17/2017 ATTACHMENT 4

Respecting Human Rights in the Energy and Natural Resources Sector. A Practical Guide by Hogan Lovells International Business and Human Rights Group

Latham & Watkins Litigation and Finance Departments. Supreme Court Limits Reach of Non-Article III Courts Jurisdiction

NEFF CORP FORM S-8. (Securities Registration: Employee Benefit Plan) Filed 11/21/14

Latham & Watkins Health Care Practice

The Senior Consumer. The Institute of Food, Medicine and Nutrition October David Donnan. A.T. Kearney October

Latham & Watkins Litigation Department

on significant health issues pertaining to their products, and of encouraging the

What future for unilateral dispute resolution clauses?

Latham & Watkins Finance Department

Case 1:18-cr DLF Document 7-1 Filed 05/04/18 Page 1 of 6 ATTACHMENT A

Client Alert. Revisiting Venue: Patriot Coal and the Interest of Justice. Background

Latham & Watkins Finance Department

State-By-State Chart of Citations

ICC INTRODUCES FAST-TRACK ARBITRATION PROCEDURE AND BOLSTERS TRANSPARENCY

USDA Rulemaking Petition

Client Alert. Circuit Courts Weigh In on Treatment of Trademark License Agreements in Bankruptcy

Background. 21 August Practice Group: Public Policy and Law. By Raymond P. Pepe

Latham & Watkins Litigation Department Securities Litigation and Professional Liability Practice

Business Immigration. Brexit and the EU Settlement Scheme. December 2018

Client Alert. Background on Discovery Requests under Section 1782

Client Alert. Rome II and the Law Applicable to Non-Contractual Obligations. Introduction

IP & IT Bytes. November Patents: jurisdiction and declaratory relief

Latham & Watkins Corporate Department. The Lessons of Slayton v. American Express for Forward-Looking Statements

Presenting our Belgian Antitrust Litigation practice. Advising you on private enforcement.

MOVING EMPLOYEES GLOBALLY:

Recent Trade Developments and the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP)

Latham & Watkins Corporate Department

Delaware Chancery Court Confirms the Invalidity of Fee-Shifting Bylaws for Stock Corporations

Omnibus accounts in Poland new solutions available to foreign investors and custodians

Changes to the Russian Civil Code: What's new in the regulation of obligations

340B Update: HRSA Finalizes 340B Pricing & Penalties for Drug Manufacturers

December 15, Dear Justice Singh: VIA ECF LITIGATION

EU-China Workshop on Trademark Law

CEE Public Procurement toolbox of remedies

HOW IS THE NLRB S NEW ELECTION PROCESS AFFECTING CAMPUS ORGANIZING?

New Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure: Impact on Chapter 7, 12 and 13 Secured Creditors

New Civil Code and Contracts What You Should Know

Japan amends its Commercial Arbitration Rules

New draft European Regulation on the freezing of bank accounts

Recent Trade Developments and the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership (TTIP)

Client Alert. Natural Resource Damages After NJDEP v. Dimant. The Spill Act. Facts of Dimant

Marathon Oil Corporation

M&A REGULATORY DEVELOPMENTS AT FERC 2016 ANNUAL REVIEW. Mark C. Williams J. Daniel Skees Heather L. Feingold December 15, 2016

Latham & Watkins Environment, Land & Resources Department

Adapting to a New Era of Strict Criminal Liability Enforcement under Pennsylvania s Environmental Laws

Security of Payment Legislation and Set-Off Under Commonwealth Insolvency Laws

Is Inter Partes Review Set for Supreme Court Review?

BREXIT: THE WAY FORWARD FOR APPLICABLE LAW AND CIVIL JURISDICTION AND JUDGMENTS?

Spansion v. Apple The Intersection of the Bankruptcy Code and Intellectual Property AIPLA Spring Meeting May 2, 2013

Slavery and Human Trafficking How the Newest Supply Chain Risk Impacts the Fashion Industry

Automotive: A Pillar of Mexico s Economy

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION

Use and abuse of anti-arbitration injunctions: strategies in dealing with anti-arbitration injunctions

Germany: A Business Location Facing Global Competition

Latham & Watkins Environment, Land & Resources Department

Latham & Watkins Finance Department

Statutory adjudication

GUIDE TO RECOGNITION AND ENFORCEMENT OF ICA ARBITRATION AWARDS IN THAILAND LEGAL GUIDE FIRST EDITION

IP & IT Bytes. Patents: guidance on experiments and scientific advisers

Latham & Watkins Environment, Land & Resources

International IP Rights Tips and Tricks International Trade-mark Applications

Appeals Court Resoundingly Affirms Scope and Breadth of Shipping Act Antitrust Exemption

Transcription:

MIP International Patent Forum 2013 Russia Focus Natalia Gulyaeva, Partner Head of IP, Media & Technology, Hogan Lovells CIS 16 April 2013

Patents as a key to business expansion: produced in Russia Russian Government's call for localization of production in Russia (e.g. high tech and pharma) Preferential treatment of local manufacturers Definition of "localized product" still remains unclear Secondary packaging does not constitute localization Call for high tech production and transfer of patented technology to Russia 2

Key trends in patent protection and enforcement in Russia Patent protection Russian Patent Office (Rospatent) Eurasian Patent Office (EAPO) Patent enforcement Russian courts State commercial courts ("arbitrazh" courts) IP court Courts of general jurisdiction Chamber for Patent Disputes under Rospatent (CPD) 3

Russian Patent v Eurasian Patent Russian Civil Code Rospatent Russian Patent Eurasian Patent Eurasian Patent Convention (EAPC) Eurasian Patent Office (EAPO) RU RU AM AZ BY KZ KG MD TJ TM More lengthy prosecution (2-4 Office Actions; 2-4 years) More formalized approach Less vulnerable to patent invalidity action Russian law is applied by Russian courts for patent enforcement More expedite prosecution (1-3 Office Actions; 1.5-3 years) More liberal approach More vulnerable to patent invalidity action Choice of law potential difficulties for patent enforcement 4

Patent enforcement: jurisdiction Patent infringement action State commercial courts patent disputes between legal entities and individual entrepreneurs Courts of general jurisdiction patent disputes involving individuals IP court Patent invalidity action CPD 5

Patent enforcement: Russian IP Court A specialized court for IP rights within the system of state commercial courts Expected to be introduced in 2013 Jurisdiction: Court of first instance (e.g. claims against the CPD' rulings) Court of 2 nd appeal (e.g. for patent infringement actions) 6

Patent infringement Direct Infringement import manufacturing application offer for sale sale other introduction into commerce storage Threat of Infringement preparations for infringement actions (obtaining regulatory approvals does not constitute preparation) Important: no scientific research, experiment or personal use with no commercial intent 7

NPEs in Russia: threats The number of Russian NPEs is growing The approaches of Russian NPEs are becoming more sophisticated The quality of patent examination remains not ideal No developed practice of Russian courts recognizing the NPEs' actions as "abuse of rights" The state fees involved into civil litigation are fairly low 8

NPEs in Russia: defensive tactics NPE's action Patent infringement action before the court of general jurisdiction Your potential counter-action Patent invalidity action before the CPD Stay of proceedings before the court of general jurisdiction Counter-claim for recovery of legal fees Patent infringement action before the state Patent invalidity action before the CPD commercial court Motion on termination of proceedings before the state commercial courts due to lack of jurisdiction Counter-claim for recovery of legal fees Administrative action (fine in amount of approx. GBP 630-840 with confiscation of respective infringing products) Providing police with evidence of noninfringement 9

NPEs in Russia: defensive tactics NPE's action Criminal action (fine in amount up to GBP approx. 4,200 or salary (or other income) of respective top manager for a period that not exceeds 18 months; or obligatory works up to 480 hours or as compulsory works up to 2 years or imprisonment up to 5 years) Your potential counter-action Providing the prosecutor's office/ police with evidence of non-infringement Letters to the Russian state authorities Promptly responding to the inquiries of state authorities Defamation claim Audio-recording of any out-of-court discussion and court proceedings 10

Thank you! 11

Used resources http://www.digitaltrends.com/cool-tech/can-crowdsourcing-save-thepatent-system/ http://www.ipc.arbitr.ru http://www.vmichurinske.ru/content/view/id/942 http://ukairportinformation.com/ http://www.reklama.com.ua/show-362512.html?lang=3 http://blog.intuit.com/money/how-to-avoid-patent-infringement-lawsuits/ http://blog.eun.org http://www.legaljuice.com/judge%20funny%20cartoon%20scales%20justi ce.gif 12

Your contact Natalia Gulyaeva Partner, Head of IP, Media & Technology Hogan Lovells CIS Tel.: +7 495 933 3000 Email: natalia.gulyaeva@hoganlovells.com 13

Hogan Lovells has offices in: Alicante Amsterdam Baltimore Beijing Berlin Brussels Budapest* Caracas Colorado Springs Denver Dubai Dusseldorf Frankfurt Hamburg Hanoi Ho Chi Minh City Hong Kong Houston Jakarta* Jeddah* London Los Angeles Madrid Miami Milan Moscow Munich New York Northern Virginia Paris Philadelphia Prague Riyadh* Rome San Francisco Shanghai Silicon Valley Singapore Tokyo Ulaanbaatar Warsaw Washington DC Zagreb* "Hogan Lovells" or the "firm" is an international legal practice that includes Hogan Lovells International LLP, Hogan Lovells US LLP and their affiliated businesses. The word "partner" is used to describe a partner or member of Hogan Lovells International LLP, Hogan Lovells US LLP or any of their affiliated entities or any employee or consultant with equivalent standing. Certain individuals, who are designated as partners, but who are not members of Hogan Lovells International LLP, do not hold qualifications equivalent to members. For more information about Hogan Lovells, the partners and their qualifications, see. Where case studies are included, results achieved do not guarantee similar outcomes for other clients. Attorney Advertising. Hogan Lovells 2013. All rights reserved. *Associated offices