Plaintiff, COMPLAINT FOR CIVIL

Similar documents
STATE OF WASHINGTON, NO. 16' Plaintiff, COMPLAINT FOR CIVIL

Plaintiff, COMPLAINT FOR CIVIL

STATE OF WASHINGTON THURSTON COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT

Defendants. I. NATURE OF ACTION. 1.1 The State of Washington (State) brings this action to enforce the State's

NO. SUMMONS THE STATE OF WASHINGTON SENDS GREETINGS TO: SEJU 775; AND SEIU 775 QUALITY CARE COMMITTEE,

Plaintiff/Petitioner, NO The Honorable Erik Price February 12, 2016.

Assistant Attorney General

STATE OF WASHINGTON THURSTON COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT STATE OF WASHINGTON, NO JUDGMENT JUDGMENT SUMMARY (RCW )

WEA VS. STATE OF WASHINGTON, d/b/a PUBLIC DISCLOSURE COMMISSION IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON COUNTY OF THURSTON

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON IN AND FOR THURSTON COUNTY. No. I. INTRODUCTION

STATE OF WASHINGTON THURSTON COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT JUDGMENT JUDGMENT SUMMARY (RCW )

STATE OF WASHINGTON KING COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT

10 Petitioner, PETITION PURSUANT TO RCW (2) FOR ORDER 11 V. COMPELLING COMPLIANCE WITH AGENCY CIVIL ORDER 12 BAILEY STOBER,

STATE OF WASHINGTON THURSTON COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT JUDGMENT SUMMARY (RCW ) B. JUDGMENT DEBTOR: WASHINGTON STATE LABOR COUNCIL

FILED 16 AUG 09 PM 2:59

11 CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT

CAMPAIGN FINANCE GUIDE

THURSTON COUNTY DEMOCRATS BYLAWS

WEA Settlement Agreement SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT

STATEMENT OF CONTRIBUTIONS POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE (PAC) W.S through 109

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

EFFECTIVE: JANUARY 31, 2014

Issue Committees. A major purpose of supporting or opposing any ballot issue or ballot question; and 22 P a g e

Campaign Finance and Public Disclosure Board

SUPERIOR COURT OF WASHINGTON IN AND FOR KING COUNTY

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON COUNTY OF KING. Plaintiff Steven Burnett, by his undersigned counsel, for his class action complaint

Title 33 State Board of Elections Subtitle 13 Campaign Financing Chapter 01 Definitions

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF KING

FILED 16 AUG 29 PM 2:30

STATEMENT OF CONTRIBUTIONS & EXPENDITURES

- l ~-o t-'... _,J. P q f 2;:.. 14 V IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF WHATCOM.

STATE OF WASIDNGTON KING COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT

SUPERIOR COURT OF WASHINGTON FOR KING COUNTY. Defendant FedEx Ground Package System, Inc. (hereinafter FedEx Ground ), by and

NO SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON PERMANENT OFFENSE, SALISH VILLAGE HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION, AND G. DENNIS VAUGHAN, Appellants,

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF KING I. RELIEF REQUESTED

8 IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON FOR PIERCE COUNTY 9 STATE OF WASHINGTON, 10. Defendant. I. INTRODUCTION

CERTIFICATION OF ENROLLMENT THIRD SUBSTITUTE HOUSE BILL Chapter 348, Laws of th Legislature 2006 Regular Session

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF KING

Case 1:18-cv Document 1 Filed 07/05/18 Page 1 of 5 THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA. Case No.

Sec moves to amend H.F. No as follows: 1.2 Delete everything after the enacting clause and insert:

STATE OF MICHIGAN CIRCUIT COURT FOR THE COUNTY OF MIDLAND

TEXAS ETHICS COMMISSION

NO Attorney for Judgment Creditor: Audrey Udashen 23 Assistant Attorney General

STATE OF WASHINGTON KING COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT DISCONTINUANCE V.

CAMPAIGN FINANCE GUIDE

Local Jurisdictions Campaign Finance Disclosure Report SDCL 12-27

Case 3:18-cv Document 1 Filed 10/03/18 Page 1 of 10 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT TACOMA

STATE PROCEEDINGS ACT

Summer Special Milk Program Program Agreement

STATE OF WASHINGTON KING COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT NO.

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE NINTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT ORANGE COUNTY, FLORIDA CIVIL ACTION

STATE OF WASHINGTON KING COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF KING. Plaintiffs, Defendant.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

SUPERIOR COURT OF WASHINGTON FOR THURSTON COUNTY 8

STATE OF WASHINGTON KING COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT NO. I. INTRODUCTION

SUPERIOR COURT OF WASHINGTON IN AND FOR SNOHOMISH COUNTY

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE ELEVENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR MIAMI-DADE COUNTY, FLORIDA

Colorado Constitution Article XXVIII (Amendment 27) Campaign and Political Finance

FILED 16 NOV 03 PM 2:13

Information for State Candidates,Their Controlled Committees, and Primarily Formed Committees for State Candidates Manual 1

Campaign Disclosure Manual 1

RULES ON POLITICAL COMMITTEES

Case 2:14-cv MJP Document 1 Filed 03/24/14 Page 1 of 13

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

7 IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF PIERCE 8 STATE OF WASHINGTON, 9 Plaintiff,

CAUSE NUMBER PLAINTIFF S FIRST AMENDED ORIGNAL PETITION AND REQUEST FOR DISCOVERY AND REQUEST FOR TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER

STATE OF WASHINGTON KING COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT

Case 2:12-cv Document 1 Filed 12/06/12 Page 1 of 14

Case 3:13-cv JE Document 1 Filed 12/20/13 Page 1 of 13 Page ID#: 1

STATE OF WASHINGTON THURSTON COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT

IC Chapter 5. Reports Required of Candidates and Committees

Case 1:17-cv Document 1 Filed 02/24/17 Page 1 of 12 PageID: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

STATE OF WASHINGTON KING COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT

ANAHEIM CAMPAIGN REFORM. Anaheim Municipal Code, Chapter 1.09

6 STATE OF WASHINGTON 7 KING COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT 8 STATE OF WASHINGTON, NO, SEA. 9 Plaintiff, STIPULATION AND AGREED JUDGMENT 10 V.

FILED 18 AUG 30 AM 11:45

Public Ethics Commission

CAMPAIGN FINANCE DISCLOSURE REQUIREMENTS FOR LOS ANGELES COUNTY OFFICES

TEXAS ETHICS COMMISSION

NEW JERSEY ELECTION LAW ENFORCEMENT COMMISSION P.O. Box 185 Trenton, New Jersey

Georgia Government Transparency & Campaign Finance Commission CANDIDATES: HOW TO GET STARTED 2015

Candidates & Public Officials 2014

NO. 14 The Plaintiff, State of Washington, by and through its attorneys Robert W. Ferguson,

Case 3:18-cv Document 1 Filed 03/15/18 Page 1 of 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON TACOMA DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN OF WASHINGTON ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE I. INTRODUCTION

If you have any questions or need additional information regarding the information that was redacted, if any, please contact:

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE THIRTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY, FLORIDA - CIVIL DIVISION -

RULES ON POLITICAL COMMITTEES

TEXAS ETHICS COMMISSION

NEW YORK CITY CAMPAIGN FINANCE BOARD RULES

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF KING. No SEA

Political Reform Division th Street, Rm. 495 Sacramento, CA 95814

This diagram shows the relationship between the NSW Electoral Commission, the Electoral Commissioner and the Parliament of NSW.

) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

STATE OF WASHINGTON THURSTON COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT

Authorized By: Election Law Enforcement Commission, Jeffrey M. Brindle, Executive Director.

Virginia Freedom of Information Act ( VFOIA ) Complaint Template

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF WALLA WALLA. Plaintiff, Defendant. I. INTRODUCTION

Transcription:

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 141 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 STATE OF WASHINGTON THURSTON COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT STATE OF WASHINGTON, I NO. 1 7-2- 0 0 9 7 2-3 4 Plaintiff, COMPLAINT FOR CIVIL V. PENALTIES AND FOR INJUNCTIVE RELIEF FOR VIOLATIONS OF THURSTON COUNTY RCW 42.17A DEMOCRATIC CENTRAL COMMITTEE, a Washington nonprofit corporation, Defendant. I. NATURE OF ACTION The State of Washington (State) brings this action to enforce the state's campaign finance and disclosure law, RCW 42.17A. The State alleges that Defendant THURSTON COUNTY DEMOCRATIC CENTRAL COMMITTEE, a Washington nonprofit corporation, violated provisions of RCW 42.17A by failing to timely disclose contributions and expenditures in filings with the Public Disclosure Commission. The State seeks relief under RCW 42.17A.750 and.765, including civil penalties, costs and fees, and injunctive relief_ H. PARTIES 2.1 Plaintiff is the State of Washington. Acting through the Washington State Attorney General, a local prosecuting attorney, or the Public Disclosure Commission, the State enforces the state campaign finance disclosure laws contained in RCW 42.17A- 2.2 Defendant THURSTON COUNTY DEMOCRATIC CENTRAL COMMITTEE ]Pqy COMPLAINT FOR CIVIL PENALTIESM (0 Campaign Finance unit

1 (Thurston County Democrats) is registered as a Washington nonprofit corporation. As the term a is used under RCW 42.17A.005(6)(c), it is the county central committee for the Washington 3 State Democratic Party in Thurston County, Washington. 4 III. JURISDICTION AND VENUE 5 3.1 This Court has subject matter jurisdiction over the present case, in accordance 6 with RCW 42.17A. The Attorney General has authority to bring this action pursuant to 7 RCW 42.17A.765. 8 3.2 This Court has personal jurisdiction over the Thurston County Democrats, a 9 Washington nonprofit corporation with active membership and representatives in the State of 10 Washington. The Thurston County Democrats headquarters is located in Olympia, 11 Washington. Additionally, the acts and omissions complained of here took place in Thurston 12 I County. 13 3.3 Venue is proper in this Court pursuant to RCW 4.12.020(1). 14 IV. FACTUAL ALLEGATIONS 15 4.1 RCW 42.17A declares as a matter of public policy "[t]hat political campaign 16 and lobbying contributions and expenditures be fully disclosed to the public and that secrecy is 17 to be avoided." RCW 42.17A.001(1). The statute further provides that the state's campaign 18 finance and disclosure law "shall be liberally construed to promote complete disclosure of all 19 information respecting the financing of political campaigns." 20 4.2 Washington's campaign finance law requires political committees to timely 21 report contributions received, including in-kind contributions. The information required to be 22 disclosed includes the name and address of the source of contributions that exceed $25 in the 23 aggregate, and the employer and occupation of any individual contributor giving more than 24 $100 in the aggregate. RCW 42.17A.235,.240; WAC 390-16-037. Contribution disclosures are 25 reported on a Public Disclosure Commission form "C-3" which is called the "Cash Receipt 26 Monetary Contributions" form. COMPLAINT FOR CIVIL PENALTIES 2 Campaign Finance Unit

1 4.3 Washington's campaign finance law also requires political committees to timely 2 report expenditures related to state campaigns, including any debts incurred by the political 3 committee. RCW 42.17A.235,.240(8); RCW 42.17A.005(20). The PDC form to report 4 expenditures is called a "Summary, Full Report Receipts and Expenditures" and is a form 5 "C-4." An expenditure is defined to include "a promise to pay,... For the purposes of this 6 chapter, agreements to make expenditures, contracts, and promises to pay may be reported as 7 estimated obligations until actual payment is made." RCW 42.17A.005(20). 8 4.4 The Thurston County Democrats is a political committee as the term is used in 9 RCW 42.17A, and is more specifically a county central committee of the Democratic Parry. As 10 such, the Thurston County Democrats routinely raises funds in order to support various 11 Democratic candidates and ballot propositions. During 2016, the Thurston County Democrats 12 received contributions and made expenditures, all of which should have been reported in 13 accordance with RCW 42.17A. 14 4.5 The Thurston County Democrats failed to timely disclose all of its contributions 15 as required by law. On September 2, 2016, the Thurston County Democrats filed an amended 16 C-4 report disclosing a $1,250 in-kind contribution dated July 11, 2016 from Walt Bowen for 17 sound systems for the Democratic Parry convention. The filing amended the Thurston County 18 Democrats' C-4 report filed July 11, 2016, for the reporting period from June 1, 2016 through 19 and including July 11, 2016 which did not disclose this information. Thus, the disclosure was 20 made 52 days late. 21 4.6 The Thurston County Democrats failed to timely disclose all of their 22 expenditures as required by law. 23 a. On September 2, 2016, the Thurston County Democrats filed an amended C-4 24 report for the April 1 through April 30, 2016 reporting period. The amended C-4 report 25 disclosed three expenditures totaling $1,131, which should have been reported May 10, 2016. 26 These disclosures were therefore reported 115 days late each. COMPLAINT FOR CIVIL PENALTIES 3 Campaign Finance unit

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 li 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 b. On September 2, 2016, the Thurston County Democrats filed an amended C-4 report for the May 1 through May 31, 2016 reporting period. The amended C-4 report disclosed four expenditures totaling $1,571, which should have been reported by June 10, 2016. These disclosures were therefore reported 84 days late each. C. Also on September 2, 2016, the Thurston County Democrats filed an amended C-4 report for the reporting period of June 1 through July 11, 2016. On that report, they disclosed $5,672.62 in expenditures which should have been disclosed on July 12, 2016; therefore, the expenditures were disclosed at least 52 days late. d. On September 2, 2016, the Thurston County Democrats disclosed $12.01 in unitemized expenditures of $50 or less, which should have been reported in their C-4 report due July 26, 2016; thus, this disclosure was 38 days late. e. On November 4, 2016, the Thurston County Democrats filed an amended C-4 report for the reporting period of October 18 through October 31, 2016. On that report, they disclosed a contribution they had made to the Hoffinan campaign on October 24, 2016, which should have been reported by November 1, 2016. This disclosure was three days late. On November 18, 2016, the Thurston County Democrats filed an amended C-4 report for the reporting period of October 18 through October 31, 2016. On that report, they disclosed an expenditure made to Verizon Wireless for $86.79 (dated October 29, 2016), which should have been reported on November 1, 2016. This payment was disclosed 17 days late. g. On February 9, 2017, the Thurston County Democrats filed an amended C-4 report for the reporting period of March 1 through March 31, 2016. On that report, they disclosed $6,782 in expenditures made (six different expenditures), which should have been reported on April 11, 2016. These disclosures were reported 304 days late each. g. Also on February 9, 2017, the Thurston County Democrats filed an amended C-4 report for the reporting period of April 1 through April 30, 2016. On that report, they disclosed two expenditures totaling $4,757 which should have been reported on May 10, 2016. COMPLAINT FOR CIVIL PENALTIES 4 Campaign Finance Unit

I These expenditures were reported 275 days late each. 21 4.7 The Thurston County Democrats failed to timely disclose debts and obligations 3 incurred during the 2016 election. The Democratic Parry caucuses took place in the early 4 spring of 2016. The Thurston County Democrats arranged to pay for meeting space for caucus 5 activity to take place on March 26, 2016. They ultimately disclosed payment of $4,826.63 to 6 rent meeting space for the party caucuses. These disclosures were made on July 11, 2016 7 ($2,075 worth of rental expenses), and September 2, 2016 ($2,751.63 worth of rental 8 expenses). On information and belief, these disclosures should have been made as debts or 9 orders placed no later than April 10, 2016, the next reporting date from the date of the 10 caucuses. As such, these disclosures were at least 92 days late. 11 V. CLAIMS 12 Plaintiff re-alleges and incorporates by reference all the factual allegations contained in 13 the preceding paragraphs, and based on those allegations, makes the following claims: 14 5.1 First Claim: Plaintiff reasserts the factual allegations made above and further 15 asserts that Defendant, in violation of RCW 42.17A.235, failed to timely disclose contributions 16 it received to the Public Disclosure Commission. 17 5.2 Second Claim: Plaintiff reasserts the factual allegations made above and further 18 asserts that Defendant, in violation of RCW 42.17A.235, failed to timely disclose expenditures 19 it made, including but not limited to debts and obligations as of the time Defendant knew or 20 should have known those amounts would exceed $250 in value, to the Public Disclosure 21 Commission. 22 VI. REQUEST FOR RELIEF 23 WHEREFORE, Plaintiff requests the following relief as provided by law: 24 6.1 For such remedies as the court may deem appropriate under RCW 42.17A.750, 25 including but not limited to imposition of a civil penalty, all to be determined at trial; 26 6.2 For all costs of investigation and trial, including reasonable attorneys' fees, as COMPLAINT FOR CIVIL PENALTIES 5 Campaign inance Unit

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 authorized by RCW 42.17A.765(5); 6.3 For temporary and permanent injunctive relief, as authorized by RCW 42.17A.750(1)(h); and 5.4 For such other legal and equitable relief as this Court deems appropriate. DATED this 6th day of March, 2017. ROBERT W. FERGUSON, Attorney General w4aa;~~-~ LINDA A. DALTON, WSBA No. 15467 Senior Assistant Attorney General WALTER M. SMITH, WSBA No. 46695 Assistant Attorney General Attorneys for Plaintiff State of Washington 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 COMPLAINT FOR CIVIL PENALTIES VIOLATIONS OF RCW 42.17A 6 ATTORNEY GENERAL OF WASH NGTON Campaign Finance Unit Olympia, WA 98504-0100