STATUS OF SIGNATURE AND RATIFICATION OF THE CONVENTION STATUS AS ON 25 SEPTEMBER Note by the secretariat

Similar documents
UNHCR, United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees

STATUS OF THE CONVENTION ON THE PROHIBITION OF THE DEVELOPMENT, PRODUCTION, STOCKPILING AND USE OF CHEMICAL WEAPONS AND ON THEIR DESTRUCTION

Proposed Indicative Scale of Contributions for 2016 and 2017

LIST OF CONTRACTING STATES AND OTHER SIGNATORIES OF THE CONVENTION (as of January 11, 2018)

Contracting Parties to the Ramsar Convention

LIST OF CHINESE EMBASSIES OVERSEAS Extracted from Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the People s Republic of China *

Convention on the Physical Protection of Nuclear Material

8. b) Optional Protocol to the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women. New York, 6 October 1999

Country pairings for the second cycle of the Mechanism for the Review of Implementation of the United Nations Convention against Corruption

Copyright Act - Subsidiary Legislation CHAPTER 311 COPYRIGHT ACT. SUBSIDIARY LEGlSLA non. List o/subsidiary Legislation

PROTOCOL RELATING TO AN AMENDMENT TO THE CONVENTION ON INTERNATIONAL CIVIL AVIATION ARTICLE 45, SIGNED AT MONTREAL ON 14 JUNE parties.

Human Resources in R&D

A Partial Solution. To the Fundamental Problem of Causal Inference

Figure 2: Range of scores, Global Gender Gap Index and subindexes, 2016

HUMAN RESOURCES IN R&D

Regional Scores. African countries Press Freedom Ratings 2001

Country pairings for the first cycle of the Mechanism for the Review of Implementation of the United Nations Convention against Corruption

PROTOCOL FOR THE PROHIBITION OF THE USE IN WAR OF ASPHYXIATING, POISONOUS OR OTHER GASES, AND OF BACTERIOLOGICAL METHODS OF WARFARE

2018 Social Progress Index

Country pairings for the first review cycle of the Mechanism for the Review of Implementation of the United Nations Convention against Corruption

INTERNATIONAL AIR SERVICES TRANSIT AGREEMENT SIGNED AT CHICAGO ON 7 DECEMBER 1944

15. a) Optional Protocol to the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities. New York, 13 December 2006

The National Police Immigration Service (NPIS) forcibly returned 412 persons in December 2017, and 166 of these were convicted offenders.

SCALE OF ASSESSMENT OF MEMBERS' CONTRIBUTIONS FOR 1994

Diplomatic Conference to Conclude a Treaty to Facilitate Access to Published Works by Visually Impaired Persons and Persons with Print Disabilities

Mechanism for the Review of Implementation of the United Nations Convention against Corruption: country pairings for the second review cycle

GLOBAL RISKS OF CONCERN TO BUSINESS WEF EXECUTIVE OPINION SURVEY RESULTS SEPTEMBER 2017

Middle School Level. Middle School Section I

World Refugee Survey, 2001

Country pairings for the second review cycle of the Mechanism for the Review of Implementation of the United Nations Convention against Corruption

REPORT OF THE FOURTH SPECIAL SESSION OF THE CONFERENCE OF THE STATES PARTIES

World Heritage UNITED NATIONS EDUCATIONAL, SCIENTIFIC AND CULTURAL ORGANIZATION

NOTE BY THE TECHNICAL SECRETARIAT STATUS OF PARTICIPATION IN THE CHEMICAL WEAPONS CONVENTION AS AT 14 MARCH SUMMARY

Mechanism for the Review of Implementation of the United Nations Convention against Corruption: country pairings for the second review cycle

Status of National Reports received for the United Nations Conference on Housing and Sustainable Urban Development (Habitat III)

2017 BWC Implementation Support Unit staff costs

Good Sources of International News on the Internet are: ABC News-

Voluntary Scale of Contributions

Global Prevalence of Adult Overweight & Obesity by Region

NOTE BY THE TECHNICAL SECRETARIAT STATUS OF PARTICIPATION IN THE CHEMICAL WEAPONS CONVENTION AS AT 25 MAY SUMMARY

UNITED NATIONS FINANCIAL PRESENTATION. UN Cash Position. 18 May 2007 (brought forward) Alicia Barcena Under Secretary-General for Management

FREEDOM OF THE PRESS 2008

KYOTO PROTOCOL STATUS OF RATIFICATION

TD/B/Inf.222. United Nations Conference on Trade and Development. Membership of UNCTAD and membership of the Trade and Development Board

Delays in the registration process may mean that the real figure is higher.

Country pairings for the first review cycle of the Mechanism for the Review of Implementation of the United Nations Convention against Corruption

Nagoya, 29 October 2010

Collective Intelligence Daudi Were, Project

CONVENTION ON INTERNATIONAL INTERESTS IN MOBILE EQUIPMENT SIGNED AT CAPE TOWN ON 16 NOVEMBER 2001

Status of the Protocol to Eliminate Illicit Trade in Tobacco Products

Return of convicted offenders

2017 Social Progress Index

The Multidimensional Financial Inclusion MIFI 1

1994 No DESIGNS

A/AC.289/2. General Assembly. United Nations

CAC/COSP/IRG/2018/CRP.9

REGIONAL INTEGRATION IN THE AMERICAS: THE IMPACT OF THE GLOBAL ECONOMIC CRISIS

AUSTRALIA S REFUGEE RESPONSE NOT THE MOST GENEROUS BUT IN TOP 25

GLOBAL PRESS FREEDOM RANKINGS

GUIDELINE OF COMMITTEES IN TASHKENT MODEL UNITED NATIONS CONFERENCE 2019

Translation from Norwegian

Japan s s Strategy for Regional Trade Agreements

UNITED NATIONS. Distr. GENERAL. FCCC/KP/CMP/2009/7 15 June Original: ENGLISH. Note by the secretariat

Draft Report of the 2018 Meeting of Experts on review of developments in the field of science and technology related to the Convention

1994 No PATENTS

Final Declaration and Measures to Promote the Entry into Force of the Comprehensive Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty*

CHAPTER XXVI DISARMAMENT 1. CONVENTION ON THE PROHIBITION OF MILITARY OR ANY OTHER HOSTILE USE OF ENVIRONMENTAL MODIFICATION TECHNIQUES

Montessori Model United Nations - NYC Conference March 2018

The NPIS is responsible for forcibly returning those who are not entitled to stay in Norway.

RC UNEP/FAO/RC/OEWG.1/3*

( ) Page: 1/12 STATUS OF NOTIFICATIONS OF NATIONAL LEGISLATION ON CUSTOMS VALUATION AND RESPONSES TO THE CHECKLIST OF ISSUES

Thirty-seventh Session. Rome, 25 June - 2 July Third Report of the Credentials Committee

IMO MANDATORY REPORTS UNDER MARPOL. Analysis and evaluation of deficiency reports and mandatory reports under MARPOL for Note by the Secretariat

A Practical Guide To Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT)

New York, 20 December 2006

Table of country-specific HIV/AIDS estimates and data, end 2001

Overview of the status of UNCITRAL Conventions and Model Laws x = ratification, accession or enactment s = signature only

The National Police Immigration Service (NPIS) returned 444 persons in August 2018, and 154 of these were convicted offenders.

CORRUPTION PERCEPTIONS INDEX 2013.

CORRUPTION PERCEPTIONS INDEX 2013.

MIGRATION IN SPAIN. "Facebook or face to face? A multicultural exploration of the positive and negative impacts of

Antipersonnel Mine Stockpile Destruction (Article 4)

Information note by the Secretariat [V O T E D] Additional co-sponsors of draft resolutions/decisions

Vienna, 11 April 1980

CENTRAL AMERICA AND THE CARIBBEAN

OVERVIEW OF THE NAGOYA PROTOCOL ON ACCESS TO GENETIC RESOURCES AND THE FAIR AND EQUITABLE SHARING OF BENEFITS ARISING FROM THEIR UTILIZATION

OFFICIAL NAMES OF THE UNITED NATIONS MEMBERSHIP

CORRUPTION PERCEPTIONS INDEX 2012.

Preparatory Commission for the PREPCOM / I/ 4 Organisation for the Prohibition 12 February 1993 of Chemical Weapons

Sex ratio at birth (converted to female-over-male ratio) Ratio: female healthy life expectancy over male value

Geoterm and Symbol Definition Sentence. consumption. developed country. developing country. gross domestic product (GDP) per capita

PARTIES SERVING AS THE MEETING OF THE PARTIES TO THE CARTAGENA PROTOCOL ON BIOSAFETY Eighth meeting Agenda item 3

Berne Convention for the Protection of Literary and Artistic Works

NOTE BY THE TECHNICAL SECRETARIAT STATUS OF PARTICIPATION IN THE CHEMICAL WEAPONS CONVENTION AS AT 17 OCTOBER 2015

10. International Convention against Apartheid in Sports

Financial situation of the United Nations. Statement by Yukio Takasu, Under-Secretary-General for Management

11. a) Convention for the Suppression of the Traffic in Persons and of the Exploitation of the Prostitution of Others

GENTING DREAM IMMIGRATION & VISA REQUIREMENTS FOR THAILAND, MYANMAR & INDONESIA

Scale of assessments for the financial period

7. International Convention on the Suppression and Punishment of the Crime of Apartheid

Transcription:

UNITED NATIONS United Nations Environment Programme Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations Distr. GENERAL PIC UNEP/FAO/PIC/INC.8/INF/1 30 September 2001 ENGLISH ONLY INTERGOVERNMENTAL NEGOTIATING COMMITTEE FOR AN INTERNATIONAL LEGALLY BINDING INSTRUMENT FOR THE APPLICATION OF THE PRIOR INFORMED CONSENT PROCEDURE FOR CERTAIN HAZARDOUS CHEMICALS AND PESTICIDES IN INTERNATIONAL TRADE Eighth session Rome, 8-12 October 2001 Item 7 of the provisional agenda STATUS OF SIGNATURE AND RATIFICATION OF THE CONVENTION STATUS AS ON 25 SEPTEMBER 2001 Note by the secretariat 1. The Rotterdam Convention on the Prior Informed Consent Procedure for Certain Hazardous Chemicals and Pesticides in International Trade was adopted by the Conference of Plenipotentiaries on 10 September 1998 in Rotterdam, the Netherlands. In accordance with its article 24, the Convention was open for signature at Rotterdam by all States and regional economic integration organizations on 11 September 1998, and subsequently at United Nations Headquarters in New York from 12 September to 10 September 1999. As on 11 September 1999 the Convention had been signed by 73 Parties, as set out in annex I. 2. As on 25 September 2001, the Convention had been ratified, accepted, approved and acceded by 16 Parties, as set out in annex I. In accordance with its article 26, the Convention will enter into force on the ninetieth day after the date of deposit of the fiftieth instrument of ratification, acceptance, approval or accession. Annex I is based on information published by the Legal Office of the United Nations. It does not constitute an official document and is reproduced for information only. 3. On 11 June 2001 the interim secretariat circulated to Parties letters requesting information on their internal status of ratification of the Rotterdam Convention. The letters included an annex providing options for identification of the status of ratification of the Convention in each party. These letters, together with the annex, are reproduced in annex II to the present document. UNEP/FAO/PIC/INC.8/1. K0119175 021001 For reasons of economy, this document is printed in a limited number. Delegates are kindly requested to bring their copies to meetings and not to request additional copies.

4. The secretariat received responses from 17 parties. A table, summarizing the responses and corresponding options of the internal status of ratification, is found in annex III to the present document. The text of the responses, as received by the interim secretariat from Parties, is attached as annex IV. 2

Annex I Status of signature and ratification, acceptance, approval and accession as of 25 September 2000 Status: Signatories: 73, Parties: 16 Not yet in force: see article 26 of the Convention Party Date of signature Angola 11 Sept. 1998 Argentina 11 Sept. 1998 Armenia 11 Sept. 1998 Australia 6 July 1999 Austria 11 Sept. 1998 Barbados 11 Sept. 1998 Belgium 11 Sept. 1998 Benin 11 Sept. 1998 Brazil 11 Sept. 1998 Bulgaria Ratification, Acceptance (A), Approval (AA), Accession (a) 25 July 2000 (a) Burkina Faso 11 Sept. 1998 Cameroon 11 Sept. 1998 Chad 11 Sept. 1998 Chile 11 Sept. 1998 China 24 Aug. 1999 Colombia 11 Sept. 1998 Congo 11 Sept. 1998 Costa Rica 17 Aug. 1999 Côte d'ivoire 11 Sept. 1998 Cuba 11 Sept. 1998 Cyprus 11 Sept. 1998 Czech Republic 22 June 1999 12 June 2000 Democratic Republic of the 11 Sept. 1998 Congo Denmark 11 Sept. 1998 Ecuador 11 Sept. 1998 El Salvador 16 Feb. 1999 8 Sept. 1999 European Community 11 Sept. 1998 Finland 11 Sept. 1998 France 11 Sept. 1998 Germany 11 Sept. 1998 11 Jan 2001 Ghana 11 Sept. 1998 Greece 11 Sept. 1998 Guinea 7 Sept. 2000 (a) Guinea-Bissau 10 Sept. 1999 Hungary 10 Sept. 1999 31 Oct 2000 Indonesia 11 Sept. 1998 Iran (Islamic Republic of) 17 Feb. 1999 Israel 20 May 1999 Italy 11 Sept. 1998 Japan 31 Aug. 1999 Kenya 11 Sept. 1998 Kuwait 11 Sept. 1998 3

Party Date of signature Ratification, Acceptance (A), Approval (AA), Accession (a) Kyrgyzstan 11 Aug. 1999 25 May 2000 Luxembourg 11 Sept. 1998 Madagascar 8 Dec. 1998 Mali 11 Sept. 1998 Mauritania 1 Sept. 1999 Mongolia 11 Sept. 1998 8 March 2001 Namibia 11 Sept. 1998 Netherlands 1/ 11 Sept. 1998 20 April 2000 (A) New Zealand 11 Sept. 1998 Nigeria 28 June 2001 (a) Norway 11 Sept. 1998 Oman 31 Jan. 2000 (a) Pakistan 9 Sept. 1999 Panama 11 Sept. 1998 18 Aug. 2000 Paraguay 11 Sept. 1998 Peru 11 Sept. 1998 Philippines 11 Sept. 1998 Portugal 11 Sept. 1998 Republic of Korea 7 Sept. 1999 Saint Lucia 25 Jan. 1999 Saudi Arabia 7 Sept. 2000 (a) Senegal 11 Sept. 1998 20 July 2001 Seychelles 11 Sept. 1998 Slovenia 11 Sept. 1998 17 Nov. 1999 Spain 11 Sept. 1998 Suriname 30 May 2000 (a) Sweden 11 Sept. 1998 Switzerland 11 Sept. 1998 Syrian Arab Republic 11 Sept. 1998 Tajikistan 28 Sept. 1998 Togo 9 Sept. 1999 Tunisia 11 Sept. 1998 Turkey 11 Sept. 1998 United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland 11 Sept. 1998 United Republic of Tanzania 11 Sept. 1998 United States of America 11 Sept. 1998 Uruguay 11 Sept. 1998 Note 1/ For the Kingdom in Europe. 4

Annex II Interim Secretariat for the Rotterdam Convention on the Prior Informed Consent Procedure for Certain Hazardous Chemicals and Pesticides in International Trade Plant Protection Service Plant Production and Protection Division Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) Viale delle Terme di Caracalla 00100 Rome, Italy Tel: (+39 06) 5705 3441 Fax: (+39 o6) 5705 6347 E-mail: pic@fao.org Chemicals United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) 11-13, Chemin des Anémones CH 1219 Châtelaine, Geneva, Switzerland Tel: (+41 22) 917 8111 Fax: (+41 22) 797 3460 E-mail: pic@unep.ch Geneva, 11 June 2001 Subject: The Rotterdam Convention on the Prior Informed Consent Procedure for Certain Hazardous Chemicals and Pesticides in International Trade To: Official contact points of UNEP and FAO in States signatories of the Rotterdam Convention. Sir/Madam, We have the pleasure to refer to the Rotterdam Convention on the Prior Informed Consent Procedure for Certain Hazardous Chemicals and Pesticides in International Trade, signed by your State. A copy is attached for ease of reference. Since the adoption of the Convention in September 1998 in Rotterdam by a Conference of Plenipotentiaries and on the basis of the resolutions adopted by that Conference, the Convention has been implemented on an interim voluntary basis. These interim arrangements are called the interim Prior Informed Consent (PIC) procedure. The interim secretariat is provided by FAO and UNEP. According to its Article 26, the Rotterdam Convention will enter into force on the 90 th day after the date of deposit of the 50 th instrument of ratification, acceptance, approval or accession. To date 14 instruments have been deposited with the Depositary of the Convention (see unofficial list of signatories and parties attached). We note that a legally binding instrument on the PIC procedure was identified in Chapter 19 of Agenda 21 of the United Nations Conference on Environment and Development (UNCED). We therefore hope that the Rotterdam Convention could enter into force by the meeting of the World Summit on Sustainable Development to be held in 2002 in Johannesburg, South Africa. In order for the interim secretariat to assess the development of the ratification status of the Convention and its prospects of entry into force we should be grateful if you, as the official contact point for FAO and/or UNEP, could provide us 5

with information on the status of the internal process of ratification of the Convention in your country. To facilitate characterization of the status of ratification in your country the annex to the present letter provides several options for you to consider. We should be grateful if you could indicate which of the suggested options best reflects the situation with in your country or, should the options not be sufficient, provide any additional clarification. Where relevant, please also indicate the anticipated date of ratification. This information will be presented at the next meeting of the Intergovernmental Negotiation Committee, which oversees the operation of the interim PIC procedure, in October 2001. Accept, Sir/Madam, the assurance of our highest consideration. N.A.Van der Graaff Executive Secretary James B. Willis Executive Secretary 6

Interim Secretariat for the Rotterdam Convention on the Prior Informed Consent Procedure for Certain Hazardous Chemicals and Pesticides in International Trade Plant Protection Service Plant Production and Protection Division Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) Viale delle Terme di Caracalla 00100 Rome, Italy Tel: (+39 06) 5705 3441 Fax: (+39 o6) 5705 6347 E-mail: pic@fao.org Chemicals United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) 11-13, Chemin des Anémones CH 1219 Châtelaine, Geneva, Switzerland Tel: (+41 22) 917 8111 Fax: (+41 22) 797 3460 E-mail: pic@unep.ch Geneva, 11 June 2001. Subject: The Rotterdam Convention on the Prior Informed Consent Procedure for Certain Hazardous Chemicals and Pesticides in International Trade To: Official contact points of UNEP and FAO in States which did not sign the Rotterdam Convention. Sir/Madam, We have the pleasure to refer to the Rotterdam Convention on the Prior Informed Consent Procedure for Certain Hazardous Chemicals and Pesticides in International Trade. A copy is attached for ease of reference. The Convention was adopted and opened for signature for one year by a Conference of Plenipotentiaries in Rotterdam in September 1998. In accordance with the resolutions adopted by that Conference, the Convention has been implemented on an interim voluntary basis. These interim arrangements are called the interim Prior Informed Consent (PIC) procedure. The interim secretariat is provided by FAO and UNEP. According to its Article 26, the Rotterdam Convention will enter into force on the 90th day after the date of deposit of the 50th instrument of ratification, acceptance, approval or accession. At present 14 instruments have been deposited with the Depositary of the Convention (see list of signatories and parties attached). We note that a legally binding instrument on the PIC procedure was identified in Chapter 19 of Agenda 21 of the United Nations Conference on Environment and Development (UNCED). We therefore hope that the Rotterdam Convention could enter into force by the meeting of the World Summit on Sustainable Development to be held in 2002 in Johannesburg, South Africa. The interim secretariat is presently collecting information on development of the ratification status of the Convention and its prospects of entry into force. We, therefore, would be grateful if you, as the official contact point for FAO and/or 7

UNEP, could provide us with information on the intention of your country to accede to the Convention.. To facilitate characterization of the status of accession to the Convention in your country the annex to the present letter provides several options for you to consider. We should be grateful if you could indicate which of the suggested options best reflects the situation in your country or, should the options not be sufficient, provide any additional clarification. Where relevant please also indicate the anticipated date of accession. This information will be presented at the next meeting of the Intergovernmental Negotiation Committee, which oversees the operation of the interim PIC procedure, in October 2001. Accept, Sir/Madam, the assurance of our highest consideration. N. Van der Graaff Executive Secretary James B. Willis Executive Secretary 8

Annex Status of Ratification of and Accession to the Rotterdam Convention. Options: 1. No steps have been taken towards ratification 1 /accession; 2. No formal steps have been taken towards ratification/accession but the Convention has been examined at technical level by respective national authorities in order to determine what actions may be needed to initiate ratification/accession; 3. The Convention has been examined at political level by respective national authorities and recommended for ratification/accession; 4. The Convention has been examined at political level by respective national authorities and not recommended for ratification/accession; 5. The Convention has been submitted to the legal and/or administrative procedures required for ratification/accession (e.g. submission to the legislature); 6. The ratification/accession has been enacted and the instrument of ratification/accession is being transmitted to the Depositary (i.e. the Secretary-General of the United Nations); 7. Expected date of deposit with the Depositary of the instrument of ratification/accession. 1 Denotes also approval or acceptance. 9

Annex III Responses provided by Parties with regard to the ratification status of the Rotterdam Convention Option numbers correspond to options in the annex to the letters in Annex II Option Party Australia* Bahrain 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Belgium* 2001 Brazil* Burkina Faso* 2002 Canada Chile* Cuba* European Community* France* 2002 Greece* Israel* Lesotho 2002 New Zealand* Republic of Korea* Saint Lucia* Turkey* 2002 * - Signatories of the Convention 10

Annex IV Responses provided by parties as received by the interim secretariat 11