Case 4:11 cr JMM Document 260 Filed 09/17/12 Page U.S. 1 DISTRICT of 12 COURT IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT ) ) ) No.

Similar documents
Case &:11 cr JMM Document 257 Filed 09/17/12 Page 1 of 12. INTHEUNITEDSTATESDISTRICTCOURT FILED s EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS PLEA AGREEMENT

!ase &'11)cr)00211).MM Doc2me4t 26& 7iled 0;<1=<12 >a?e 1 1A

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI WESTERN DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI WESTERN DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI WESTERN DIVISION PLEA AGREEMENT

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI WESTERN DIVISION

5 CRWIINAL NO. H

Case 3:10-cr FDW Document 3 Filed 04/07/10 Page 1 of 7

involved in the transaction, full restitution, a special

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO. Eastern Division

EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA. Alexandria Division PLEA AGREEMENT

Case 1:17-cr RC Document 3 Filed 12/01/17 Page 1 of 10. United States v. Michael T. Flynn

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI ST. JOSEPH DIVISION

GUILTY PLEA and PLEA AGREEMENT8Y:

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA. Alexandria Division PLEA AGREEMENT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION. No. CR

Case 1:09-mj JMF Document 3 Filed 01/12/2009 Page 1 of 13 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA PLEA AGREEMENT

AT SEA TILE. The United States of America, by and through John McKay, United States Attorney 16

Case 1:17-cr MHC Document 5 Filed 03/20/17 Page 1 of 19

1. The defendant understands her rights as follows:

case 3:04-cr AS document 162 filed 09/01/2005 page 1 of 6

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI WESTERN DIVISION. Plaintiff, ) v. ) No CR-W-FJG. Defendant.

United States v. Biocompatibles, Inc. Criminal Case No.

Case 8:09-cr CJC Document 54 Filed 05/18/12 Page 1 of 17 Page ID #:143

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI WESTERN DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI WESTERN DIVISION PLEA AGREEMENT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. Judges PLEA AGREEMENT

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION PLEA AGREEMENT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON

Case 2:12-cr AWA-TEM Document 51 Filed 05/09/12 Page 1 of 10 PageID# 147 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THI

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA NORTHERN DIVISION PLEA AGREEMENT.,Esq.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA HAMMOND DIVISION

Case 2:17-cr JAK Document 25 Filed 05/15/18 Page 1 of 19 Page ID #:80

Case 2:15-cr FMO Document 52 Filed 04/25/16 Page 1 of 17 Page ID #:295

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MONTANA BUTTE DIVISION

Case 1:18-cr LM Document 2 Filed 07/23/18 Page 1 of 14 UNITED STATES DISTWCT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE PLEA AGREEMENT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION PLEA AGREEMENT

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI WESTERN DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION PLEA AGREEMENT

8:15-cr JFB-FG3 Doc # 7 Filed: 04/10/15 Page 1 of 7 - Page ID # 19

Case 2:13-cr CLS-HGD Document 6 Filed 08/02/13 Page 1 of 18 AMENDED PLEA AGREEMENT. The Government and defendant, RUTH GAYLE CUNNINGHAM hereby

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOLTTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION PLEA AGREEMENT

FlLED RECEIVED. Case 2:09-cr ROS Document 152 Filed 11/08/10 Page 1 of 8 ~LODGED COPY NOV Ct.ERK US DISTRICT COURT DISTR CT OF A.

Background. The Defendant. 1. From in or around 2007 through in or around January 2017,

TYPE OF OFFENSE(S) AND SECTION NUMBER(S) LIST OFFENSE(S), CASE NUMBER(S) AND DATE(S) 3. CASE NUMBER(S) AND DATE(S)

Case 3:17-cr HEH Document 11 Filed 07/19/17 Page 1 of 11 PageID# 16

Case 2:12-cr JES-UAM Document 41 Filed 07/01/13 Page 1 of 19 PageID 110

Case 3:06-cr AWT Document 4 Filed 11/22/06 Page 1 of 8

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE EIGHTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR

Case 3:17-cr RBL Document 8 Filed 07/06/17 Page 1 of 10 FILED. LDOOED,RECEIVED JUL

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI ST. JOSEPH DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION PLEA AGREEMENT

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI WESTERN DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI WESTERN DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI WESTERN DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ALASKA. ) No. 3:17-cr TMB ) ) ) ) ) PLEA AGREEMENT

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI WESTERN DIVISION

Case 2:15-cr FFM Document 38 Filed 07/19/16 Page 1 of 16 Page ID #:114

Case 8:16-cr WGC Document 5 Filed 02/01/16 Page 1 of 7. . U.S. Department of Justice

3:09-cr MJP Date Filed 04/15/09 Entry Number 5 Page 1 of 5

SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF ORANGE VEHICLE CODE MISDEMEANOR GUILTY PLEA FORM. 1. My true full name is

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION PLEA AGREEMENT

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MONTANA BUTTE DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Case 4:06-cr HLM Document 5 Filed 09/11/06 Page 1 of 13

Case 2:18-cr JPS Filed 03/12/18 Page 1 of 16 Document 3

Case 2:09-cr R Document 25 Filed 12/10/2009 Page 1 of 24

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

STATE OF MARYLAND * IN THE * CIRCUIT COURT vs. * FOR * * CASE NO.

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA : IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS : CRIMINAL ACTION : NO. GUILTY PLEA COLLOQUY

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI WESTERN DIVISION

SUPCR 1104 FOR COURT USE ONLY SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF SANTA CRUZ DUI ADVISEMENT OF RIGHTS, WAIVER, AND PLEA FORM. (Vehicle Code 23152)

SUPCR 1106 FOR COURT USE ONLY

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

It Is important, then, that you fully understand these rights before pleading guilty.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI ST. JOSEPH DIVISION

LIST OFFENSE(S), CASE NUMBER(S) AND DATE(S)

WEsfMN ~~~f ~~C,.i'/D.~sAs

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF CLAY COUNTY, MISSOURI AT LIBERTY. STATE OF MISSOURI ) ) Plaintiff ) ) VS ) Case No. ) ) Defendant )

Re: United States v. Alfonso Portillo, 09 Cr (RPP)

FILED DEC Q--IL. DecemberJ, 2008

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN PLEA AGREEMENT

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT. No D.C. Docket No. 8:06-cr EAK-TGW-4. versus

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI WESTERN DIVISION PLEA AGREEMENT

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI WESTERN DIVISION

The court process CONSUMER GUIDE. How the criminal justice system works. FROM ATTORNEY GENERAL JEREMIAH W. (JAY) NIXON

6 Brooklyn, NY Defendant x February 22, :30 p.m. 9 Transcript of Criminal Cause for Pleading

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

COURT RULES OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE CHAPTER 12 TABLE OF CONTENTS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION. Plaintiff, ARRAIGNMENT AND PLEA HEARING Monday, January 26, 2009

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION PLEA AGREEMENT

Case 8:07-cr AG Document 141 Filed 01/11/11 Page 1 of 6 Page ID #:2159. United States District Court Central District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION

PLEA AGREEMENT THOMAS QUINN

Transcription:

Case 4:11 cr 00211 JMM Document 260 Filed 09/17/12 Page U.S. 1 DISTRICT of 12 COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS FILED SEP 1 7 2012 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ) v. ) ) No. 4:11CR00211-7 JMM ANTHONY HALL, aka Lil A ) ) PLEA AGREEMENT The United States Attorney for the Eastern District of Arkansas, Christopher R. Thyer, by and through Julie E. Peters and Benecia B. Moore, Assistant United States Attorneys, and ANTHONY HALL, aka Lil A, defendant, represented by the undersigned counsel, hereby agree to the following terms and conditions in connection with the above referenced proceedings. 1. GUlL TY PLEA: The defendant will enter a plea of guilty to conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute and to distribute a controlled substance, a violation of Title 21, United States Code, Section 846, as set forth in Count One of the Superseding Indictment. The United States agrees to move for dismissal of the remaining counts against the defendant in this matter (Counts Sixteen and Seventeen) upon acceptance of the guilty plea. This is a Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 11(c)(l)(A) plea agreement. 2. ELEMENTS OF THE CRIME: The parties agree the elements of the offense to which the defendant will plead guilty are: A. One, two or more persons reached an agreement or came to an understanding to possess with intent to distribute and to distribute a controlled substance; B. Two, the defendant voluntarily and intentionally joined the agreement or understanding, either at the time it was first reached or at some later time while it was still in effect; and,

Case 4:11 cr 00211 JMM Document 260 Filed 09/17/12 Page 2 of 12 C. Three, at the time the defendant joined in the agreement or understanding, he knew the purpose of the agreement or understanding. The defendant agrees that he is guilty of the offense charged and each of these elements is true. 3. PENALTIES: A. STATUTORY PENALTIES: Based on the drug quantity stipulated in Paragraph 5 of this Agreement, the maximum penalty for the charge set forth in Count One is not less than five years imprisonment and not more than forty years imprisonment, not less than four years and up to life supervised release, and a $1 00 special assessment. B. SUPERVISED RELEASE: Supervised release is a period of time following imprisonment during which defendant will be subject to various restrictions and requirements. Defendant understands that if defendant violates one or more of the conditions of any supervised release imposed, the defendant may be returned to prison for all or part of the term of supervised release, which could result in defendant serving a total term of imprisonment greater than the statutory maximum stated above. 4. WAIVERS: The defendant acknowledges that he has been advised of and fully understands the nature of the charges to which the plea is offered, the mandatory minimum penalty provided by law, if any, and the maximum possible penalty provided by law. The defendant further understands that by entering into this Agreement and Addendum, he is waiving certain constitutional rights, including, without limitation, the following: A. The right to plead not guilty or to persist in that plea if it has already been made, and the right to a speedy and public trial before a jury; 2

Case 4:11 cr 00211 JMM Document 260 Filed 09/17/12 Page 3 of 12 B. The right to be presumed innocent and to have the burden of proof placed on the United States to establish guilt beyond a reasonable doubt; C. The right to confront and cross examine witnesses; D. The right to testify in his own behalf if the defendant so chooses, or, the right to remain silent and not be compelled to testify, and to have that choice not used against the defendant; E. The right to call witnesses and to require those witnesses to appear by issuing subpoenas. 5. STIPULATIONS: The United States and the defendant stipulate to the following: A. The parties agree that the base offense level is 26 pursuant to U.S.S.G. 2D1.1(c)(7), because the quantity of cocaine attributable to the defendant is at least 500 grams but less than two kilograms. B. The defendant is eligible for a 2 point reduction for acceptance of responsibility unless the defendant takes any action between the entry of the guilty plea and imposition of the sentence that is inconsistent with acceptance of responsibility. If the offense level is 16 or greater, the determination of whether the defendant is eligible for a third point reduction for acceptance of responsibility will be made by the United States at the time of sentencing. C. The government agrees not to file an information against defendant pursuant to Title 21, United States Code, Section 851, seeking enhancement of defendant's sentence on the basis of a prior conviction for a felony drug offense. 3

Case 4:11 cr 00211 JMM Document 260 Filed 09/17/12 Page 4 of 12 D. The parties stipulate that no other enhancements or reductions under Section 2Dl.1 or Chapter 3 ofthe Guidelines apply. E. The defendant agrees that the following facts are true: In 2011, in Marianna, Arkansas, ANTHONY HALL purchased at least 500 grams of cocaine from Torrence Turner for redistribution. HALL purchased cocaine by going to Turner's residence in Marianna. While at the residence, HALL observed Turner's son, Chuck [Torrence Davis] counting money from drug transactions. HALL also communicated with Turner about their cocaine deals over the phone. For example, on May 20, 2011, at 11:56 a.m., Call321 (FBI TP6), HALL, using 870-317-7387, contacted Turner. During this call, HALL stated, "My boy down here, he want five," meaning HALL was brokering a transaction for five ounces of cocaine. Turner told HALL, "I want a stack down the line, you probably have to take him to someone else... I gotta have my stack down the line,... you still be making whatever, $100 on at least one ofthem cars," meaning Turner wanted $1 000 per ounce, and HALL could profit $1 00 per ounce on top of that price. HALL stated, "That's what we gonna do, then," and Turner responded, "That's what we gonna have to do man. We already know it's a crisis out here. You shoulda told them niggas $1150. Shit, it's a crisis," meaning the cocaine in the area was scarce, and therefore TURNER and HALL could charge a higher price per ounce. Similarly, on June 8, 2011, at 4:22p.m., Call 2971 (FBI TP6), HALL contacted Turner. During this call, HALL told Turner that he had a customer who wanted a "ten piece nugget," meaning ten ounces of cocaine, but Turner had no cocaine and referred HALL to PI [Marcus Thompson]. Further, on June 15, 2011, at 7:56p.m., Call3803 (FBI TP6), HALL contacted Turner. During this call, HALL told Turner about someone who purchased a kilogram of cocaine for "29," meaning $29,000, and "flew out there and drove it back," meaning flew to the pick-up location near the U.S.-Mexico border, and drove 4

Case 4:11 cr 00211 JMM Document 260 Filed 09/17/12 Page 5 of 12 back to Arkansas. Turner and HALL then debated whether the travel expenses would ultimately make the kilogram cost as much at the border as if purchased in or around Marianna. On October 6, 2010, in Hopkins County Circuit Court, Texas, Case No. 0921356, HALL pleaded guilty to felony possession of cocaine 1-400 grams and was sentenced to ten years probation. Supervision of this probation was transferred to Lee County, Arkansas. On July 12, 2011, in Lee County Circuit Court Case No. 2010-30, HALL pleaded guilty to felony possession of cocaine and was sentenced to five years probation. HALL had the same Arkansas state probation officer for both offenses. During the time HALL was supervised by this state probation officer, HALL paid this probation officer money so he could continue selling drugs without the state probation officer's interference. Typically, HALL visited the state probation officer once a month, either alone or with a group of probationers from the Marianna area. When the group visited the state probation officer, they would pool their money together and give the state probation officer between $100-150 per visit. If HALL went alone, he would give the state probation officer $20-30 per visit. HALL knew this money was not part of his probation fees. The average amount of money HALL gave Davis per visit was $75, with $25 going to Texas probation fees, $25 going to Arkansas probation fees, and $25 going to Davis personally. If HALL didn't have enough cash to pay his fees he would still give Davis a few dollars. The parties understand that the Court is not bound by these stipulations. The defendant further understands that if the Court does not accept the stipulations, the defendant is not entitled to withdraw the guilty plea or otherwise be released from defendant's obligations under this Agreement and Addendum. 6. SENTENCING GUIDELINES: It is specifically understood by the defendant that the Sentencing Guidelines are not mandatory but are advisory, and that the Court is to 5

Case 4:11 cr 00211 JMM Document 260 Filed 09/17/12 Page 6 of 12 consult them in determining the appropriate sentence. The defendant understands that the determination of the applicability of the Guidelines and of the appropriate sentence will be made by the Court. The defendant is aware that any estimate of the probable sentencing range under the Sentencing Guidelines that the defendant may have received from the defendant's counsel, the United States, or the Probation Office, is merely a prediction, not a promise, and is not binding on the United States, the Probation Office, or the Court. The United States makes no promise or representation concerning what sentence the defendant will receive and the defendant cannot withdraw a guilty plea, or otherwise avoid the defendant's obligations under this Agreement and Addendum, based upon the actual sentence imposed by the Court. The parties understand and agree that if the guideline range is greater or less than the defendant or the United States expected it to be, and/or the sentence imposed by the Court is greater or lesser than anticipated, neither the defendant nor the United States will be allowed to withdraw, nor request withdrawal of, the guilty plea, nor be excused from any obligation under this Agreement and Addendum. 7. ALLOCUTION: The United States reserves the right to bring any and all facts which it believes are appropriate to the attention of the Court. 8. COOPERATION IN THE SENTENCING PROCESS: A. The defendant agrees to truthfully provide all information to the Probation Office as is needed for preparation of the pre-sentence report, including, but not limited to, criminal history information. The defendant shall voluntarily provide a complete and truthful written accounting of the defendant's criminal history to the Probation Office. B. The defendant agrees to execute all waivers necessary for the preparation of the pre-sentence report. 6

Case 4:11 cr 00211 JMM Document 260 Filed 09/17/12 Page 7 of 12 C. The defendant understands and acknowledges that the defendant's obligation of disclosure regarding criminal history is not limited to arrests and convictions reported in computer databases, but requires the defendant to disclose all arrests and/or convictions, including any juvenile matters, regardless of whether the defendant believes the arrest/conviction counts under the Sentencing Guidelines. D. The defendant is required to comply with these obligations no later than the expiration of the date on which objections to the pre-sentence report are due. 9. FINANCIALMATTERS: A. FINANCIAL STATEMENT: The defendant agrees to fully and truthfully complete a Financial Statement provided by the United States Probation Office. B. FINES: The defendant understands that unless the Court determines that the defendant is financially unable to pay a fine, the Court must impose a fine pursuant to the Sentencing Reform Act of 1984. C. SPECIAL PENALTY ASSESSMENT: The defendant agrees to pay to the United States a special assessment of $100.00 per count, as required by Title 18, United States Code, Section 3013. This special assessment is to be paid by bank cashier's check or money order as directed by the Court. Cashier's checks or money orders should be made payable to "Clerk, United States District Court." D. RESTITUTION: The parties also state that restitution is not applicable, and that there are not victims who are due restitution from the defendant. 10. DOUBLE JEOPARDY AND SUCCESSIVE PROSECUTION: The United States Attorney for the Eastern District of Arkansas will bring no further charges against the 7

Case 4:11 cr 00211 JMM Document 260 Filed 09/17/12 Page 8 of 12 defendant for any acts or conduct arising out of the events described in the Indictment, which is the subject of this action, unless the defendant breaches this Agreement and Addendum. 11. RECORDS: The defendant hereby waives all rights, whether asserted directly or by a representative, to request or receive from any department or agency of the United States any records pertaining to the investigation or prosecution of this case, including without limitation any records that may be sought under the Freedom oflnformation Act, 5 U.S.C. Section 552, or the Privacy Act of 1974,5 U.S.C. Section 552a. 12. CIVIL CLAIMS BY THE GOVERNMENT: Except to the extent otherwise expressly specified herein, this Agreement and Addendum does not bar or compromise any civil or administrative claim pending or that may be made against the defendant, including but not limited to tax matters. 13. EFFECT OF DEFENDANT'S BREACH OF PLEA AGREEMENT AND ADDENDUM: A. Defendant acknowledges and understands that if the defendant violates any term of this Agreement and Addendum, engages in any further criminal activity prior to sentencing, or fails to appear for any subsequent proceeding including sentencing, the United States shall have, in addition to all other rights and remedies otherwise available, the right to: (1) terminate this Agreement and Addendum; or (2) proceed with this Agreement and Addendum and (a) deny any and all benefits to which the defendant would otherwise be entitled under the terms of this Agreement and Addendum; and/or 8

Case 4:11 cr 00211 JMM Document 260 Filed 09/17/12 Page 9 of 12 (b) advocate for any sentencing enhancement that may be appropriate. B. In the event the United States elects to terminate this Agreement and Addendum, the United States shall be released from any and all obligations hereunder. The defendant acknowledges and understands that the agreement of the United States to dismiss any charge is conditioned upon final resolution of this matter. If this Agreement and Addendum is terminated or if the defendant's conviction ultimately is overturned, then the United States retains the right to reinstate any and all dismissed charges and to file any and all charges which were not filed because of this Agreement and Addendum. C. The defendant hereby knowingly and voluntarily waives any defense based upon the applicable statute of limitations and/or the Speedy Trial Act, for any charges reinstated or otherwise filed against the defendant as a result of defendant's breach of this Agreement and Addendum, so long as the United States initiates any otherwise time barred action within one year of termination or revocation of this Agreement and Addendum. D. In the event that the Agreement and Addendum is terminated or if the defendant successfully moves to withdraw their plea, any statement made by the defendant in negotiation of, or in reliance on this Agreement and Addendum: (1) may be used to cross examine the defendant should he testify in any subsequent proceeding; and/or (2) any leads derived therefrom may be used by the United States. The defendant waives any and all rights to the contrary and shall assert no claim under the United States Constitution, any statute, or any rule of procedure or evidence to the contrary. 9

Case 4:11 cr 00211 JMM Document 260 Filed 09/17/12 Page 10 of 12 14. PARTIES: This Agreement and Addendum is binding only upon the United States Attorney's Office for the Eastern District of Arkansas and the defendant. It does not bind any United States Attorney outside the Eastern District of Arkansas, nor does it bind any other federal, state or local prosecuting, administrative, or regulatory authority. 15. MISCELLANEOUS: A. MODIFICATION: No term or provision contained herein may be modified, amended or waived except by express written agreement signed by the party to be bound thereby. B. HEADINGS AND CAPTIONS: Subject headings and captions are included herein for convenience purposes only and shall not affect the interpretation of this Agreement and Addendum. C. WAIVER: No waiver of a breach of any term or provision of this Agreement and Addendum shall operate or be construed as a waiver of any subsequent breach or limit or restrict any other right or remedy otherwise available. Any waiver must be expressly stated in writing signed by the party to be bound thereby. D. RIGHTS AND REMEDIES CUMULATIVE: The rights and remedies ofthe United States expressed herein upon any breach hereunder by the defendant are cumulative and not exclusive of any rights and remedies otherwise available to the United States in the event of any breach of this Agreement and Addendum by defendant. E. JOINT NEGOTIATION: This Agreement and Addendum has been mutually negotiated by the parties hereto, and any uncertainty or ambiguity existing herein shall not be interpreted against any party by reason of its drafting of this Agreement and Addendum, but instead 10

Case 4:11 cr 00211 JMM Document 260 Filed 09/17/12 Page 11 of 12 shall be interpreted according to the application of the general rules of interpretation for arms length agreements. 16. NO OTHER TERMS: This document and the Addendum completely reflect all promises, agreements and conditions made between the parties, constitute the entire agreement between the parties and supersedes any and all prior agreements or understandings between the parties, oral or written, with respect to the subject matter hereof. 17. APPROVALS AND SIGNATURES: A. DEFENDANT: The defendant has read this Agreement and Addendum and carefully reviewed every part of it with his attorney. The defendant understands and voluntarily agrees to the terms and condition of this Agreement and Addendum. Further, the defendant has consulted with his attorney and fully understands his rights with respect to the provisions of the United States Sentencing Guidelines which may apply to this case. No other promises or inducements have been made to the defendant, other than those expressly contained in this Agreement and Addendum. In addition, no one has threatened or forced the defendant in any way to enter into this Agreement and Addendum. Defendant further acknowledges that defendant has entered into this Agreement and Addendum, consciously and deliberately, by defendant's free choice, and without duress, undue influence or otherwise being forced or compelled to do so, and this Agreement and Addendum constitutes the legal, valid and binding obligation of the defendant, fully enforceable against defendant in accordance with its terms. Finally, the defendant is satisfied with the representation of his attorney in this case. B. DEFENSE COUNSEL: Defense counsel acknowledges that he is the attorney for the defendant, and that he has fully and carefully discussed every part of this Agreement and Addendum with the defendant. Further, defense counsel has fully and carefully advised the defendant of the defendant's rights, of possible defenses, and of the consequences of entering into 11

Case 4:11 cr 00211 JMM Document 260 Filed 09/17/12 Page 12 of 12 this Agreement and Addendum, including the possible consequences of not complying with this Agreement and Addendum. To counsel's knowledge, the defendant's decision to enter into this Agreement and Addendum is an informed and voluntary decision. DATED this J.t:_ day of September, 2012. CHRISTOPHER R. THYER United States Attorney By: Assistant United States Attorneys Post Office Box 1229 Little Rock, Arkansas 72203 (501) 340-2600 julie.peters@usdoj.gov benecia.moore@usdoj.gov Defendant f. WILLIAM P. LUPPEN Attorney for Defendant 12