Cross-border cooperation between universities and research centres

Similar documents
questionnaire on removing obstacles and promoting good practices on cross-border cooperation

AEBR NEWSFLASH No. 32 Winter 2014

Working Group on Innovative Solutions to Cross Border obstacles Luxembourg Presidency of the EU follow up

Statement. Frontier workers and the single market

Minutes of ERGA 7 th Plenary Meeting. Brussels, March 9 th, 2017

Seminar 5: International lessons in crossborder

Speech from Justin Amiot on behalf of President Jean-Yves Le Drian Tulcea, Friday 24 May 2013

EUROPEAN TERRITORIAL COOPERATION. Interreg V-A Poland-Denmark-Germany-Lithuania-Sweden (South Baltic) Programme

How can we strengthen political cooperation in the Barents region? Future strategic priorities for the Barents cooperation

PARTNERSHIP IN A EUROPE WITHOUT BORDERS Electronic Newsletter of AEBR December 2007

CENTRAL EUROPE state of art and future perspectives

EU INTERNAL AND EXTERNAL COOPERATION ACTIONS - BACKGROUND INFORMATION AND FACTORS OF CONSIDERATION FOR A CPMR POSITION

Chronology. The Development of the Association of European Border Regions

9107/15 TB/at 1 DG G 3 B

Germany and the Middle East

Strategic framework for FRA - civil society cooperation

IMPORTANCE OF COHESION POLICY FOR THE FUTURE OF THE EU

Patrizio Bianchi Regional Minister of Emilia-Romagna Catania, 22 maggio 2018

The EU Macro-regional Strategies relevant for Western Balkans, with specific Focus on the Environmental Issues

CEI PD PARLIAMENTARY ASSEMBLY. Sarajevo, December 5 7, 2016 FINAL DECLARATION

To my parents that, with their patience, have continuously supported me. to make this dream come true.

Council of the European Union Brussels, 20 November 2017 (OR. en)

ERB 2030 Agenda Euroregion Baltic

Council Regulation (EC) No 2062/94 of 18 July 1994 establishing a European Agency for Safety and Health at Work

REPORT FROM THE COMMISSION TO THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND THE COUNCIL

EUROPAFORUM NORTHERN SWEDEN

Council of the European Union Brussels, 6 November 2015 (OR. en)

(EXECUTIVE SUMMARY) FINAL REPORT. CROSS-BORDER COOPERATION IN LATIN AMERICA Contribution to the regional integration process

Interreg and Dutch border regions

Committee of Senior Representatives (CSR) Twenty-ninth Meeting Riga, Latvia April 2018

No. prev. doc.: 15819/13 PI 159 European Patent with Unitary Effect and Unified Patent Court - Information by the Presidency

COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION. Brussels, 13 November 2003 (Or. fr) 14766/03 Interinstitutional File: 2003/0273 (CNS) FRONT 158 COMIX 690

Rights of passengers travelling by bus and coach (Regulation (EU) N 181/2011)

AEBR ANNUAL CONFERENCE IN SZCZECIN, EUROREGION POMERANIA OCTOBER 7/8, 2004 F I N A L D E C L A R A T I O N

Council of the European Union Brussels, 5 May 2015 (OR. en)

Report of NGO on State of Human and Minority Rights in Slovakia

MINUTES AEBR TASK FORCE OF EXTERNAL BORDERS (TFEB) Meeting of Ukrainian and Russian Euroregions

Guide for the drafting of action plans and reports for the execution of judgments of the European Court of Human Rights

AIM AND OBJECTIVES OF THE PROJECT

The revised system of case referral under the Merger Regulation: experiences to date Stephen A. RYAN, Directorate-General Competition, unit A-2 ( 1 )

TOWARDS A NEW COMMUNITY LEGAL INSTRUMENT FACILITATING PUBLIC-LAW-BASED TRANSEUROPEAN COOPERATION AMONG TERRITORIAL AUTHORITIES IN THE EUROPEAN UNION

Conference of Speakers of the European Union Parliaments

PERIODIC REPORT BY ESTONIA

Project on. TOURISM and PEACE. Final Report. February 2012 December 2014

EUROPEAN COMMISSION Employment, Social Affairs and Equal Opportunities DG ADVISORY COMMITTEE ON FREE MOVEMENT OF WORKERS

MEDITERRANEAN COOPERATION DAYS

Resolution of the Youth Video Internet Bridge Participants

Overview CBSS Baltic Sea Science Day Turku,

The Danube Region: transformation and emergence

The EU Strategy for the Danube Region (EUSDR) An overview

Economic and Social Council

explain why we believe the link is crucial for our communi- Hamburg and Schleswig-Holstein in Germany, Region

EUROPEAN COMMISSION Employment, Social Affairs and Equal Opportunities DG ADVISORY COMMITTEE ON FREE MOVEMENT OF WORKERS

MEETING OF THE TERRITORIAL COOPERATION WORKING GROUP 20 NOVEMBER BRUSSELS - REPORT -

Baltic Science Network. A Political Answer to Current Challenges of Science Policy in the Baltic Sea Region

Document on the role of the ETUC for the next mandate Adopted at the ETUC 13th Congress on 2 October 2015

Crossing the borders. Studies on cross-border cooperation within the Danube Region Foreword. Acknowledgments. Introduction.

Guidelines for Performance Auditing

United Nations standards and norms in crime prevention

Cohesion and competitiveness of the Baltic Sea Region

1) Cooperation with the European Union, its institutions and programmes. 3) Accession of the European Community to the Carpathian Convention

COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION. Brussels, 23 November /11 COPEN 338 EUROJUST 200

SEPTEMBER Solidarity with refugees - EFFAT speaks with one voice on the role of trade unions in the current migration crisis

Partnership Annual Conference (PAC) Third Conference Oslo, Norway 12 December 2006

Transnational cooperation and territorial cohesion

Biometric data in large IT borders, immigration and asylum databases - fundamental rights concerns

Scottish Government Consultation. Amendment to Rule 58 of the Mental Health Tribunal for Scotland (Practice and Procedure) (No.

CEI PD PARLIAMENTARY ASSEMBLY. Skopje, 10 December 2015 FINAL DECLARATION

INSPIRE from the EU perspective Where we stand and the road ahead

Annual Report from the Committee of Senior Officials The 7 th Year of the Council s Activity

Strategic document on Smart cooperation. Territorial Cooperation fostering European integration: Cities and Regions linking across borders

Annex 3 Findings of Pre-departure Services in Shanghai and Seoul

15580/16 EB/dk 1 DGD 1C

United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization Executive Board

The present Questionnaire is prepared in application of the aforementioned decision of the Subsidiary Committee.

«NEW HIGHLANDERS» AND FOREIGN IMMIGRATION

European Commission contribution to An EU Aid for Trade Strategy Issue paper for consultation February 2007

Implementing the Patent Package Second progress report. 1. State of implementation of the EU regulations N 1257/2012 and 1260/2012

European Society of Intensive Care Medicine

Cross-Border Cooperation

TERMS OF REFERENCE FOR THE CALL FOR TENDERS

Cross-Border Cooperation

Council of the European Union Brussels, 24 October 2017 (OR. en)

COU CIL OF THE EUROPEA U IO. Brussels, 6 ovember 2008 (11.11) (OR. fr) 15251/08 MIGR 108 SOC 668

The forty-sixth session of the Board will be opened by the Acting President of the Board, H.E. Ms. Faouzia Mebarki (Algeria).

7 th Baltic Sea States Summit

Mini Hearing of Parliament

1. human security in cities

Trade and Sustainable Development in EU Trade Agreements. DG TRADE Civil Society Dialogue Meeting 11 June 2014

FINAL RECOMMENDATION OF THE HELSINKI CONSULTATIONS HELSINKI 1973

EUROPEAN COMMISSION HEALTH AND FOOD SAFETY DIRECTORATE-GENERAL SUMMARY REPORT EU PLATFORM ON FOOD LOSSES AND FOOD WASTE: SUB-GROUP ON FOOD DONATION

[LOGO] Rules of Procedure of the Joint Monitoring Committee for the ENI Cross-border Cooperation Programme Poland-Belarus-Ukraine

The Nordic Council of Ministers' Arctic Cooperation

QUESTIONNAIRE ON RAISING AWARENESS ABOUT INTANGIBLE CULTURAL HERITAGE

Estonia. Source:

// Territorial and Urban Potentials Connected to Migration and Refugee Flows Presentation of the main project findings Vienna,

Proposal for a REGULATION OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL

SCRUTINY UNIT COMMITTEE OFFICE, HOUSE OF COMMONS

Operational Directives for the Implementation of the Convention for the Safeguarding of the Intangible Cultural Heritage

Socio-economic challenges, potentials and impacts of transnational cooperation in central Europe

Transcription:

Version of 3 April 2008 Cross-border cooperation between universities and research centres - Report - AEBR-Study Co-operation between Universities, Higher Education Institutions and Research Centres in Europe s Border Regions 2006/2007 Summary results of several surveys carried out by the Association of European Border Regions (AEBR) as well as of website and literature analysis 2006/2007 by Dr. Viktor Frhr. von Malchus Gronau/Trieste April 2008

Contents: 1. Aim of the study and surveys in European border regions 2003-2007 1.1 Aim and key issues 1.2 First survey 2003/2004 and its evaluation 1.3 Second survey of AEBR in border regions 2005/2006 1.4 Third survey on cooperation between universities / higher education institutions in Europe s border regions 2007 2. Quantity, quality and geographical distribution of survey and analysis results in cross-border regions in Europe 2003-2007 2.1 Quantity and quality of survey results 2.2 Geographical distribution of survey results in Europe 2.3 Universities / higher education institutions covered by the surveys 3. First preliminary survey results 2

1. Aim of the study and surveys in European border regions 2003-2007 1.1 Aim and key issues analysis objectives Due to the fact that an important first step towards a competitive European Higher Education area in border regions is the knowledge of as well as the exchange of information and best practices on cooperation between different regional universities, higher education institutions and research centres at the end of the year 2002 the Executive Committee of AEBR took for the first time the decision to carry out a survey on Cooperation between universities and higher education institutions in Europe s border regions. Major condition facilitating practical cross-border cooperation between universities and higher education institutions in border regions, both in terms of research, education and professional training and the cooperation with business and public administration, is the knowledge of existing cooperation potentials and the prospective need for cooperation in border regions. An overall question is therefore: How cross-border cooperation between universities / higher education institutions on the one hand and with business and public administration on the other hand can enhance the development of regions and the welfare of citizens living in these regions? 1.2 First survey 2003/2004 and its evaluation On 13 January 2003 the Secretary General of AEBR Jens Gabbe and the Chairman of the Advisory Committee of AEBR Dr. Viktor von Malchus addressed all border and cross-border regions in Europe with following lines: The cooperation between universities, higher education institutions etc. are gaining in importance. Obviously, there still is a lack of information of forms of cooperation between universities and polytechnic schools in border areas, i.e. structures of cooperation and contents as well as possible goals for the future (e.g. amalgamation of universities, coordination of study courses and so on)." The responses were sparse, arrived quite slowly and required several reminders by phone and in written. 3

With regard to contents the survey replies were highly different: short and long reports, not all were qualitatively sufficient, large annexes, hardly structured. It was a highly difficult task to bring them together in one overview! At the end of 2003 36 crossborder regions sent their answers to the questions of AEBR (see the series of tables of 2004). The results demonstrate that by the end of 2003 not all border and cross-border regions were sufficiently familiar with the issue of cooperation between universities and higher education institutions in border areas, but at least the subject aroused great interest. Moreover, the survey allowed first interesting statements on the forms and ways of cooperation between higher education institutions as well as with business and public administration. The distribution of answers by European subspaces was highly different as well. The majority of answers arrived from Northern Europe. However, many comprehensive contributions came also from Southern Europe, in this case mainly from Spain. The first results and the preliminary final report (translated into three languages and published on the AEBR-website www.aebr.eu) were a highly interesting issue for border and cross-border regions and the Executive Committee of AEBR. Consequently, in summer 2005 the Executive Committee of AEBR decided to carry out once again a more structured survey addressing border regions and friends of AEBR. 1.3 Second survey of AEBR in border regions 2005/2006 On 22 July 2005 the Secretary General of AEBR Jens Gabbe and the Chairman of the Advisory Committee sent following letter to members and friends of AEBR: Please find attached the report on Cooperation between universities and higher education institutions in Europe s border regions, which was elaborated in the year 2004. We would like to update this report and bring it up to scratch and would therefore be grateful if you could answer the following questions: 1) Have new forms of cooperation between universities been established in your cross-border region since 2002/2003 or are there forms of cooperation, which have not yet been reported? 2) Number and name of the universities/higher education institutions cooperating on a cross-border level? 3) Contractual basis and structure of the cooperation? 4

4) What are the most important contents of the cooperation? 5) What are the aims/measures planned for the future? 6) Have bigger research landscapes or cooperation scenes been developed in addition and what is their scientific emphasis? The replies to the survey on cross-border cooperation between universities / higher education institutions were expected to be sent by 30 September 2005 at the latest to the Secretariat General of AEBR. While reminding border and cross-border regions / Euroregions to send their missing answers and in a supplementary survey of February 2006 the additional question was asked, if border regions / Euroregions were involved in cross-border cooperation between universities / higher education institutions in the own region or would like to participate in such cooperation in the future? Moreover, it was asked, if the cross-border cooperation between universities / higher education institutions is hampered by legal problems. The replies came slowly and were in some cases incomplete. Last reports arrived in summer / autumn 2007 after several reminders by phone and in written. Some large and important border regions (e.g. Geneva, Vienna, Autonomous Region Friuli Venezia Giulia or Euroregion Strymon- Strouma) haven t replied up to now. Even inquiries by phone remained mostly without success. Since then the author and the AEBR Secretariat General completed the results of the survey in detail work through reminders, interviews, translations and sources analysis (website analysis), structured them regionally (based on the map: Cross-border cooperation areas 2007 - www.aebr.eu - ) and with regard to contents (based on the list of questions of 2006/2007) and with all reserve towards the quality, the contents and the integrity presented the summary results in a series of tables. 1.4 Third survey on cooperation between universities / higher education institutions in Europe s border regions In anticipation of the expected debate in the European Parliament and the European Commission the AEBR had to anew update and refine the survey results. For that reason the Secretary General of AEBR Martín Guillermo-Ramírez and the Chairman of the Advisory Committee of AEBR Dr. Viktor Frhr. von Malchus asked border and 5

cross-border regions (Euroregions or border regions) in Europe once again on 15 July 2007 to reply briefly and quickly to following ten questions: 1. Is there a name for cross-border co-operation between universities in your region? Examples for such names would be Øresund University, ALMA, EUCON or Lake Constance University. If you have not answered this question before, please let us know the name and the address of the secretariat, as well as the web address: www.; 2. Number and names of the universities/higher education institutions cooperating on cross-border level, in case not reported yet; 3. In case you have not answered this question already, has your border region/euroregion been involved in the establishment and the ongoing activities of Cross-border co-operation between universities? If yes, when did this start and in which way has your region been involved? 4. Contractual basis and structure of the university cooperation in your region or cross-border region? 5. Important contents of the university cooperation and their funding, own funds (total amount and %), public funds (total amount and %), e.g. through national education policy, EU education policy, EU research policy, EU cohesion and regional policy (INTERREG III und IV)? 6. Promotion of the attractiveness of the university and its cross-border cooperation through publicity and public relations and other measures? 7. Aims/measures of the university co-operation planned for the future? 8. Have bigger research landscapes or cooperation scenes been developed in or beyond your cross-border region (see also question 1)? Do these areas have main scientific emphasis? We as AEBR have identified 20 of such research landscapes (see enclosed outline of the book of texts). In case your region has already been recorded by us, an answer is only necessary with regard to changes/progress since 2005. Please state the web address! 9. In how far your border region/euroregion has been involved in the University/ higher education institutions/research centre co-operation and/or is planning to do so in the future? Have applications already been made in the context of the 6

EU education policy (2007-2013) or EU cohesion and regional policy (2007-2013)? 10. Are there any legal problems which hampered cross-border co-operation between universities in your cross-border region? If yes, and you have not answered this question already which ones? This supplementary survey of July 2007 delivered new important information and demonstrated progress in cooperation between universities in border areas. The corresponding report tables are currently (2008) completed and up-dated. 2. Quantity, quality and geographical distribution of survey and analysis results in cross-border regions in Europe 2003-2007 2.1 Quantity and quality of survey results 89 border and cross-border regions sent their reports by the end of 2007, while in the year 2003 only 36 regions replied. Many regions up-dated their reports in 2005/2007 and ca. 50 regions sent completely new reports. This means that the rate of return amounted to 80%. With regard to quantity and quality the survey results greatly improved since 2003/2004. In the meantime, many border regions have recognised the opportunities and advantages of cross-border cooperation between universities / higher education institutions for the own region, what means that the efforts pay off! The AEBR has gained much new information with benefit for European border regions! Nevertheless, it must be underlined that many reports didn t meet the expectations and some border and cross-border regions didn t reply to the surveys of AEBR, although important universities / higher education institutions are located in these border regions that most probably also cooperate across borders. Many universities in Europe don t mention cross-border co-operation on their websites. Unfortunately, the same is also true for many border regions! As consequence, the surveys and analysis deserved and still deserve many efforts from AEBR and correspond with many difficulties. 2.2 Geographical distribution of survey results in Europe The geographical distribution of reports delivered by border regions in the course of the surveys 2003-2007 and of findings based on literature and website analysis is as follows: 7

Geographical distribution of reports delivered by Europe s border regions and of literature and website analysis 2003-2007 on universities / higher education institutions cooperating across borders (as of 2007) Europe s subspaces Replies from border regions 2003-2007 and reports based on literature and website analysis 2007 2003 2006/2007 Participating universities Northern Europe and Baltic Sea 12 24 ca. 140 Central and Eastern Europe 6 10 ca. 120 North-West Europe 6 19 ca. 160 Alps and Danube area 6 20 ca. 90 South-West Europe 6 12 ca. 80 South-East Europe 0 4 ca. 40 Total border regions / univ. 36 89 ca. 630 The overview shows that the results have totally changed since 2003. The amount of reports corresponds with the geographical dispersion of border regions in Europe s subspaces and the survey results more than doubled since 2003. Many new findings have been brought together! With regard to the reports quality there are no differences related to the geographical location. However, as regards the amount of answers in Europe a clear North-South divine has been observed. 2.3 Universities / higher education institutions covered by the surveys According to first rough estimations in total 600-700 universities / higher education institutions / research centres are involved in cross-border cooperation in Europe s border regions. The most important findings have been summarised in a series of tables. They will be completed in German by summer 2008. The analysis of the reports contents shall be carried out in the text volume of the study Cooperation between universities and higher education institutions in Europe s border regions. However, this is a work-intensive task requiring a lot of translations, which the 8

AEBR alone is not able to fulfil. For that reason, the AEBR is aiming at signing a research contract in cooperation with DG Research of the EU Commission that would facilitate the evaluation of survey results with benefit for the EU Commission and border regions and in this way would contribute to the utilisation of the research results. 3. First preliminary survey results 3.1 Generally, the surveys were very successful. Including friends of AEBR and higher education institutions more than 80% of border regions have replied to our survey. More than 700 higher education institutions and research centres work together across borders. 3.2 In many border regions the cross-border cooperation between universities has even a name: e.g. Öresund University (DK/SE), UNISKA (NO/SE), ALMA (BE/DE/NL), EUCOR (CH/DE/FR) or Bodensee University (AT/CH/DE/LI). In these cases higher education institutions on both sides of the border are part of a higher education landscape / cluster. According to first findings there are ca. 30 such cross-border cooperation structures in Europe. 3.3 Up to now, only in single cases border regions are involved in the initiation of cross-border cooperation between universities or are involved in already established cooperation structures. 3.4 Nearly all forms of cross-border cooperation between universities are based on a legal foundation, i.e. both the cooperation between universities and between faculties or research centres. 3.5 The cooperation structures are highly different. They are run usually by a Rectors Conference with rotating chairmanship. Structures with a Joint Secretariat achieve usually best cooperation results. 3.6 Important contents of cross-border cooperation between universities are: - Implementation of the Bologna Process in its entirety, - Improved competence in foreign languages, - Creation of joint curricula and academic degrees as well as their cross-border acknowledgement, 9

- Exchange of students and teachers as well as provision of services and financial support, - Cooperation in and joint research with the aim to exploit potential synergies, - Exploitation of EU financial support within the EU regional policy (e.g. INTERREG III/IV) or the EU research policy including the 6th and 7th Research Framework Programme, - Joint research for business and public administration in a cross-border region. 3.7 With targeted marketing and public relations strategies many cooperations aim at improving the universities attractiveness in Europe offering 30 different higher education and research landscapes. 3.8 In the first years of the new century the cooperation between universities and research centres in Europe s border regions has been intensively fostered. The common policy promoting the creation of a European Higher Education Area and the EU research policy contributed remarkably to this development. Accordingly, we highly support the idea to disseminate the steadily growing knowledge on the exploitation of cooperation opportunities between universities in Europe in a positive way and to apply this knowledge for the benefit of border and cross-border regions. In this context, the study of AEBR would like to contribute to the achievement of these goals. 10