IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE STATE OF OREGON FOR THE COUNTY OF MULTNOMAH ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Similar documents
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE STATE OF OREGON FOR THE COUNTY OF MULTNOMAH ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) No.

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE STATE OF OREGON COUNTY OF MULTNOMAH

9/29/2017 1:57:26 PM 17CV42542 IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE STATE OF OREGON FOR THE COUNTY OF MULTNOMAH ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

10/18/ :38 AM 18CV47218 IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE STATE OF OREGON FOR THE COUNTY OF MULTNOMAH. Case No. COMPLAINT.

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE STATE OF OREGON FOR THE COUNTY OF MULTNOMAH. Case No. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

1/9/2019 1:52 PM 19CV01569 IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE STATE OF OREGON FOR THE COUNTY OF MULTNOMAH. Case No.

FOR THE COUNTY OF WASHINGTON

1/29/2019 8:49 AM 19CV04626

11/29/2018 2:22 PM 18CV54567 IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE STATE OF OREGON FOR THE COUNTY OF MULTNOMAH. Case No. COMPLAINT PARTIES

3/11/ :19 AM 19CV11254 IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE STATE OF OREGON FOR THE COUNTY OF MULTNOMAH ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

3/24/ :21:10 AM 17CV12356 IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE STATE OF OREGON FOR MULTNOMAH COUNTY. ) ) Case No.: ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) COMPLAINT

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE STATE OF OREGON FOR THE COUNTY OF DESCHUTES ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) PARTIES

(Negligence, Negligence Per Se)

1/1/2019 4:52 PM 19CV00011 IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR THE STATE OF OREGON FOR MULTNOMAH COUNTY. Case No. COMPLAINT FACTUAL ALLEGATIONS

8/31/2018 2:12 PM 18CV38516 IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE STATE OF OREGON FOR THE COUNTY OF MULTNOMAH ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE STATE OF OREGON FOR THE COUNTY OF MULTNOMAH

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE STATE OF OREGON FOR THE COUNTY OF MULTNOMAH. Case No. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) NATURE OF THE ACTION PARTIES

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE STATE OF OREGON FOR LANE COUNTY

2/25/2019 4:13 PM 19CV08567 IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE STATE OF OREGON FOR THE COUNTY OF MULTNOMAH

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE STATE OF OREGON FOR THE COUNTY OF MULTNOMAH ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR THE STATE OF OREGON IN THE COUNTY OF MULTNOMAH

10/11/2018 8:39 AM 18CV45669 IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE STATE OF OREGON FOR THE COUNTY OF MULTNOMAH ) COMPLAINT ) ) ) Case No.:

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE STATE OF OREGON FOR THE COUNTY OF [COUNTY

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE STATE OF OREGON FOR THE COUNTY OF MULTNOMAH ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CLAIM FOR RELIEF. (Negligence)

CAUSE NO. V. JUDICIAL DISTRICT DEFENDANTS. TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS PLAINTIFFS ORIGINAL PETITION NOW COMES SHERRY REYNOLDS, BRANDON REYNOLDS, KATY

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR THE STATE OF OREGON FOR MULTNOMAH COUNTY. Case No.

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN MATEO

Case 3:16-cv KI Document 1 Filed 11/14/16 Page 1 of 8

2/13/ :36 PM 19CV07131 IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR THE STATE OF OREGON FOR MULTNOMAH COUNTY. Case No. COMPLAINT. Negligence FACTUAL ALLEGATIONS

7/19/2018 6:06 PM 18CV30704 IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE STATE OF OREGON FOR THE COUNTY OF MULTNOMAH. Plaintiff WOF SW GGP 1 LLC alleges as follows:

Filing # E-Filed 12/22/ :53:20 PM

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR THE STATE OF OREGON FOR MULTNOMAH COUNTY. Case No. COMPLAINT. Negligence

THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE STATE OF OREGON FOR THE COUNTY OF MULTNOMAH. Case No.

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR THE STATE OF OREGON FOR MULTNOMAH COUNTY. Case No. COMPLAINT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. ROBERT S AMERICAN GOURMET FOOD, INC., a domestic corporation; & JURY DEMAND

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE STATE OF OREGON FOR THE COUNTY OF MULTNOMAH

Plaintiff, for its Complaint against the above-captioned Defendants, states and

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE STATE OF OREGON FOR THE COUNTY OF MULTNOMAH ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) THE PARTIES AND VENUE

Filing # E-Filed 05/22/ :20:45 PM

10/30/2017 7:04 PM 17CV47399 IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE STATE OF OREGON FOR THE COUNTY OF MULTNOMAH ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) PARTIES

10/10/2018 9:50 AM 18CV45543 IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE STATE OF OREGON FOR THE COUNTY OF MULTNOMAH. Case No. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case 3:16-cv MO Document 1 Filed 09/29/16 Page 1 of 13

Case 2:12-cv ABJ Document 1 Filed 05/02/12 Page 1 of 11 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF WYOMING

FILED: KINGS COUNTY CLERK 05/25/ /09/ :37 12:27 PM INDEX NO /2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 10 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 05/25/2016

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE TWELFTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA, IN AND FOR MANATEE COUNTY CIRCUIT CIVIL DIVISION

Strict Liability and Product Liability PRODUCT LIABILITY WARRANTY LAW

Case 1:18-cv RP Document 1 Filed 06/13/18 Page 1 of 13 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS AUSTIN DIVISION

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR THE STATE OF OREGON FOR MULTNOMAH COUNTY. Case No.

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR THE SEVENTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR BROWARD COUNTY, FLORIDA CIVIL DIVISION. ClassAction.

Case 2:14-cv MJP Document 1 Filed 03/24/14 Page 1 of 13

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ROME DIVISION

Case 2:12-cv JRG-RSP Document 1 Filed 08/02/12 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 1

Case 1:15-cv Document 1 Filed 05/22/15 Page 1 of 12 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON PORTLAND DIVISION

Case 3:10-cv B Document 1 Filed 09/10/10 Page 1 of 6 PageID 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS GALVESTON DIVISION

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF GILES COUNTY, TENNESSEE

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR THE STATE OF OREGON FOR MULTNOMAH COUNTY. Case No.

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR THE STATE OF OREGON FOR MARION COUNTY

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT AND JURY DEMAND

Case 3:14-cv BR Document 1 Filed 06/24/14 Page 1 of 7 Page ID#: 1

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF CUMBERLAND

Case 4:18-cv RGE-SBJ Document 1 Filed 02/20/18 Page 1 of 9 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF IOWA

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE STATE OF OREGON FOR THE COUNTY OF MULTNOMAH. Case No. COMPLAINT

... To the above named Defendants

4/2/2018 2:16 PM 18CV12858 IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR THE STATE OF OREGON FOR MULTNOMAH COUNTY. Case No. COMPLAINT FACTUAL ALLEGATIONS

COMPLAINT AND JURY DEMAND

Case 1:15-cv Document 1 Filed 10/30/15 Page 1 of 21 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE STATE OF OREGON FOR THE COUNTY OF MULTNOMAH. Petitioner, Respondent.

IN THE STATE COURT OF FULTON COUNTY STATE OF GEORGIA

Case 3:17-cv PK Document 9 Filed 02/08/17 Page 1 of 11

Case 3:14-cv BR Document 1 Filed 10/09/14 Page 1 of 7

FILED: BRONX COUNTY CLERK 01/26/ :43 AM INDEX NO /2018E NYSCEF DOC. NO. 2 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 01/26/2018

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATHENS DIVISION

IN THE STATE COURT OF FULTON COUNTY STATE OF GEORGIA

COMPLAINT. Apartments at Riverfront Heights ( Defendant or Evergreen ) is a Delaware

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF GREENE COUNTY STATE OF GEORGIA

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT LEE COUNTY, ILLINOIS COMPLAINT

Case 1:18-cv ECF No. 1 filed 06/20/18 PageID.1 Page 1 of 8

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE STATE OF OREGON FOR THE COUNTY OF MULTNOMAH

Courthouse News Service

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF UTAH, CENTRAL DIVISION

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE STATE OF OREGON FOR THE COUNTY OF MULTNOMAH. Case No.: ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES. The plaintiff, David Lutz, by and through his counsel of record, Brett Dressler, Esq.

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 03/15/ :24 AM INDEX NO /2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 12 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 03/15/2016

STRICT LIABILITY. (1) involves serious potential harm to persons or property,

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA. Plaintiffs, Defendants.

Case 1:17-cv PLM-PJG ECF No. 1 filed 03/07/17 PageID.1 Page 1 of 14

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE STATE OF OREGON COUNTY OF MULTNOMAH ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case 3:16-cv Document 1 Filed 02/22/16 Page 1 of 6 Page ID #1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

END USER LICENSE AGREEMENT

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE STATE OF OREGON FOR THE COUNTY OF KLAMATH. No.

Case 3:12-cv Document 1 Filed 11/15/12 Page 1 of 17

DAVID F. SUGERMAN ATTORNEY, PC 707 5\'1;1 Washington St., Suite Portland, Oregon (503)

California Bar Examination

CLOSING INSTRUCTIONS. this case. As I mentioned at the beginning of the trial, you must keep an open

STATE OF LOUISIANA PLAINTIFFS VERSUS

Transcription:

// :: AM CV 1 IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE STATE OF OREGON FOR THE COUNTY OF MULTNOMAH TIM NAY aka THOMAS W. NAY, JR., Personal Representative for the Estate of Andrew C. Lane, an Oregon resident, v. Plaintiff, LANDA NORTHWEST, INC., an Oregon corporation; AMERICAN HONDA MOTOR CO., INC., a foreign corporation; SUPERIOR HOME MAINTENANCE LLC, an Oregon limited liability company; HOMEMASTERS FRANCHISE LLC, an Oregon limited liability company; and NW HOME MAINTENANCE LLC, an Oregon limited liability company; Defendants. Plaintiff alleges: Multnomah County, Oregon. PAGE 1 COMPLAINT Case No. PARTIES & VENUE 1. COMPLAINT (Product Liability; Negligence; ORS Chapter A; Wrongful Death; Employer Liability Law (Amount of Prayer:$,000,000 CLAIM NOT SUBJECT TO MANDATORY ARBITRATION (Pursuant to UTCR.00 Jury Trial Requested Filing Fee Under Or Laws, ch., sec. ; ORS.0(1(d: $ Tim Nay aka Thomas W. Nay, Jr. is the duly appointed personal representative for the Estate of Andrew C. Lane and the personal representative s principal office is located in

. Defendant Landa Northwest, Inc. ( Landa is an Oregon corporation, with its principal place of business in Multnomah County, Oregon, at 1 NE Marx Street, Portland, Oregon. Landa conducts regular, sustained business activity in Multnomah County, has an office for the transaction of business in Multnomah County, and has an agent authorized to receive service of process in Multnomah County, Oregon.. Defendant Superior Home Maintenance LLC ( Superior is Oregon limited liability company with its principal place of business at SE Richey Rd., Boring, OR 00. Superior conducts regular, sustained business activities in Multnomah County, Oregon.. Defendant Homemasters Franchise LLC ( Homemasters is an Oregon limited liability company with its principal place of business at SW Bonita Rd., Tigard, OR. Homemasters conducts regular, sustained business activity in Multnomah County, Oregon.. Defendant NW Home Maintenance LLC ( NW Home is an Oregon limited liability company with its principal place of business at SW Bonita Rd., Tigard, OR. NW Home conducts regular, sustained business activity in Multnomah County, Oregon.. Defendant American Honda Motor Co., Inc. ( Honda is a foreign corporation with its principal place of business in Torrance Blvd., Torrance, CA 001. Honda conducts regular, sustained business activity in Multnomah County, Oregon. PAGE COMPLAINT

COMMON ALLEGATIONS. At all material times, Andrew C. Lane was an employee of Superior.. In, Andrew Lane is diagnosed with Irritable Bowel Syndrome ( IBS. IBS is a chronic condition whose symptoms require frequent, urgent use of toilet facilities to defecate.. During Andrew Lane s employment with Superior, both Superior and one or more agents knew of Andrew Lane s IBS diagnoses and need to frequently use toilet facilities.. On May,, Andrew Lane and two other Superior employees were ordered to drive a Homemasters box van to a residential home located in Sandy, Oregon. That day they pressure washed and cleaned gutters.. The Homemasters box van is equipped with a gas-powered pressure washer permanently installed in the rear compartment of the van.. Landa sold and installed the pressure washer, which has a Honda GX0 -stroke engine.. On May,, Superior does not provide toilet facilities for its employees. Superior does not make arrangements with the work site homeowners for Superior employees to use toilet facilities on the premises. The work site does not have toilet facilities accessible to Andrew Lane. The nearest off-site toilet, at a commercial establishment, is approximately eight minutes by car from the work site. Andrew Lane does not have personal PAGE COMPLAINT

transportation available to this facility.. On several prior occasions, Superior instructed Andrew Lane and other employees to use a bucket in the Homemasters box van when at a work site without a publically accessible toilet. Superior knew that Andrew Lane had used a bucket in the rear compartment of the Homemasters box van as a toilet on prior occasions at other work sites.. On May,, with the gas-powered pressure washer running, Andrew Lane enters the rear compartment of the Homemasters box van to use the provided bucket as a toilet. He closes the doors. Carbon monoxide from the running pressure washer fills the compartment. Carbon monoxide exhaust poisons Andrew Lane until he dies.. At all material times, Superior was an actual agent or apparent agent of Homemasters. Homemaster retained the right to control Superior s actions and the specific tortious or unlawful conduct detailed in this complaint. FIRST CLAIM FOR RELIEF (Landa Strict Product Liability/ORS Chapter 0. Plaintiff incorporates paragraphs 1 to above.. Landa s gas-power pressure washer unit is defective and unreasonably dangerous beyond the extent contemplated by ordinary users, in one or more of the following ways: a. Landa s gas-power pressure washer works in enclosed spaces in the absence of proper ventilation. b. Landa s gas-power pressure washer does not have a carbon monoxide PAGE COMPLAINT

detector. c. Landa s gas-power pressure washer does not have an automatic shutoff device triggered by dangerous carbon monoxide levels. d. Landa s gas-power pressure washer s labeling fails to warn consumers to not use the product in an enclosed space without proper ventilation. e. Landa s gas-power pressure washer s instructions fail to advise consumers not to use the product in an enclosed space without proper ventilation. f. Landa s gas-power pressure washer s labeling fails to warn users to not close the box van s door while using the product. g. Landa s gas-power pressure washer s instructions fail to advise consumers not to close the box van s door while using the product.. Andrew Lane received the gas-powered pressure washer unit without substantial change in the condition in which it was sold.. The unreasonably dangerous and defective condition of Landa s gas-power pressure washer unit caused or substantially contributed to Andrew Lane s carbon monoxide poisoning and death. SECOND CLAIM FOR RELIEF (Landa Negligence/Wrongful Death. Plaintiff incorporates paragraphs 1 to above.. Landa committed wrongful acts or omissions in one or more of the following ways: a. Landa s installation of a gas-power pressure washer in an enclosed van PAGE COMPLAINT

unreasonably exposed users to dangerous levels of carbon monoxide. b. Landa knew or reasonably should have known that its gas-powered pressure washer created an unreasonably dangerous environment when used as installed. c. Landa failed to instruct or warn consumers that the gas-powered pressure washer should not be operated with the van doors closed. d. Landa failed to instruct or warn consumers that the gas-powered pressure washer should only be operated in well-ventilated spaces.. The negligent acts and omissions alleged above caused or were a substantial factor in causing Andrew Lane s carbon monoxide poisoning and death. THIRD CLAIM FOR RELIEF (Honda Strict Product Liability/ORS Chapter 0. Plaintiffs incorporate paragraphs 1 to above.. Honda s GX0 -stroke engine is defective and unreasonably dangerous beyond the extent contemplated by ordinary users, in one or more of the following ways: a. Honda s GX0 -stroke engine works in enclosed spaces in the absence of proper ventilation. b. Honda s GX0 -stroke engine does not have a carbon monoxide detector. c. Honda s GX0 -stroke engine does not have an automatic shutoff device triggered by dangerous carbon monoxide levels. d. Honda s GX0 -stroke engine s labeling inadequately warns consumers to not use the product in an enclosed space without proper ventilation. PAGE COMPLAINT

e. Honda s GX0 -stroke engine s instructions inadequately advise consumers not to use the product in an enclosed space without proper ventilation.. Honda specifically markets the GX0 -stroke engine for use in pressure washers.. Andrew Lane received the Honda GX0 -stroke engine unit without substantial change in the condition in which it was sold.. The unreasonably dangerous and defective condition of the Honda GX0 -stroke engine caused or was a substantial factor is causing Andrew Lane s carbon monoxide poisoning and death. FOURTH CLAIM FOR RELIEF (Honda Negligence. Plaintiff incorporate paragraphs 1 to above. 0. Honda committed wrongful acts or omissions in one or more of the following ways: a. Honda failed to properly warn and instruct purchasers of the dangers associated with using the GX0 -stroke engine as a constituent part within products designed for use in enclosed spaces. b. Honda failed to design the GX0 -stroke engine to prevent harm associated with its foreseeable use in inadequately ventilated spaces. 1. The negligent acts and omissions alleged above caused or were a substantial factor in causing Andrew Lane s carbon monoxide poisoning and death. PAGE COMPLAINT

FIFTH CLAIM FOR RELIEF (Superior & Homemasters Battery/ORS.. Plaintiffs incorporate paragraphs 1 to 1 above.. Superior exposed Andrew Lane to known deadly gases.. Andrew Lane did not consent to being exposed to know deadly gases.. Superior acted with the deliberate intention to cause injury or death to Andrew Lane by requiring him to enter a confined space filled with known deadly gases.. Because Superior acted with the deliberate intention to cause injury or death, Superior is liable for its actions irrespective of Oregon s Workers Compensation Law, ORS Chapter. SIXTH CLAIM FOR RELIEF (Superior, Homemasters, & NW Homes Statutory Tort for Unlawful Employment Practices under ORS Chapter A. Plaintiff incorporates paragraphs 1 to above.. Andrew Lane had, had a record of having, or was regarded as having a physical impairment that substantially limited his ability to control his bowels, a major life function.. Superior, Homemasters, and NW Home, all employers of Andrew C. Lane for PAGE COMPLAINT

purposes of ORS A, committed one or more unlawful employment practices against Andrew Lane based upon his disability, including but not necessarily limited to, by limiting, segregating, or classifying him through its conduct and policy of requiring Andrew Lane to defecate in a bucket, in the back of a work van. Superior s conduct was demeaning, debasing, and dehumanizing and affected Andrew Lane s opportunities and status as an employee. Ultimately, Superior s unlawful employment practices led to Mr. Lane s carbon monoxide poisoning and death. 0. Superior, Homemasters, and NW Home violated ORS Chapter A by failing to make reasonable accommodations available to Andrew C. Lane. SEVENTH CLAIM FOR RELIEF (Superior, Homemasters, & NW Home Employer Liability Law/ORS.0 1. Plaintiff incorporates paragraphs 1 to 0 above.. At the time of his death, Andrew Lane engaged in work that involved risk or danger to him.. Homemasters or NW Home or both engaged in a common enterprise with Superior and the conduct of Homemasters or NW Home or both created the risk or danger that ultimately resulted in Andrew Lane s carbon monoxide poisoning and death.. Homemasters or NW Home or both controlled or retained the right to control the manner or method in which the risk-producing activity was performed that ultimately resulted in Andrew Lane s carbon monoxide poisoning and death. PAGE COMPLAINT

. Superior, Homemasters, NW Home, and each of them, violated the following safety codes, promulgated as minimum standards for the safety and protection of others, including Andrew Lane: (a OAR -00-0(1(c: Requiring limiting exposure to certain substances including carbon monoxide. (b OAR -00-0(: Requiring administrative or engineering controls whenever feasible. When such controls are not feasible to achieve full compliance, requiring protective equipment or other protective measures be used to keep the exposure of employees to air contaminants. (c OAR -001-00(1(a: Requiring employers to see that workers are properly instructed and supervised in the safe operation of any machinery, tools, equipment, process, or practice that they are authorized to use or apply. (d CFR.1(c(1(i: Requiring toilet facilities be provided in all places of employment. (e ORS.0: Requiring employers provide place of employment which is safe and healthful for employees.. Superior, Homemasters, NW Home, and each of them failed to use every device, care and precaution that is practicable to use for the protection and safety of life and limb, limited only by the necessity for preserving the efficiency of the structure, machine or other apparatus or device, and without regard to the additional cost of suitable material or safety appliance and devices. Their failures caused or were a substantial factor in causing Andrew Lane s carbon monoxide poisoning and death. PAGE COMPLAINT

DAMAGES. As a result of the conduct of Defendants, and each of them, Plaintiff suffered economic harms, including but not necessarily limited to medical and funeral expenses, pecuniary and income losses to Plaintiff s estate and family, in the amount of $1,000,000.. As a result of the conduct of Defendants and each of them, Decedent Lane s family has and is experiencing pain, suffering, loss of society, companionship, services, and other noneconomic harms, in the approximate amount of $,000,000.. As a result of the unlawful employment practices as set forth above, Plaintiff seeks all available legal and equitable remedies under ORS Chapter A, including but not necessarily limited to, compensatory damages in the amount of $1,000,000 and injunctive relief that is fair, just and equitable 0. Plaintiff is entitled to recover reasonable attorneys fees and costs, including but not limited to expert witness fees, under ORS A.(1. 1. Plaintiff is entitled to recover prejudgment interest pursuant to ORS.0(1(a.. Plaintiff reserves the right to amend this Complaint as required by ORS 1.. PAGE COMPLAINT

WHEREFORE, Plaintiffs pray for judgment as follows: 1. Economic damages in the amount of $1,000,000, subject to amendment at or before trial;. Noneconomic damages in the amount of $,000,000, subject to amendment at or before trial;. Compensatory damages for Unlawful Employment Practices in the amount of $1,000,000, subject to amendment at or before trial;. Injunctive relief for Unlawful Employment Practices;. Prejudgment interest pursuant to ORS.0(1(a;. Reasonable attorney fees associated with Unlawful Employment Practices claims;. For Plaintiff s costs and disbursements incurred herein; and,. For such further and other relief as the Court deems just, proper and equitable. Dated this th day of May, D AMORE LAW GROUP, P.C. By: /s/ Nicholas A. Kahl Thomas D Amore, OSB # Nicholas A. Kahl, OSB # Attorneys for Plaintiff Trial Attorneys: Thomas D Amore, OSB # D AMORE LAW GROUP, P.C. 0 Galewood Street, Suite 0 Lake Oswego, OR 0 David Penoyer, OSB #000 Penoyer Law Office LLC Galewood St Lake Oswego OR 0 PAGE COMPLAINT