Chapter 12 CAPITAL PUNISHMENT. Introduction to Corrections CJC 2000 Darren Mingear

Similar documents
SCOTUS Death Penalty Review. Lisa Soronen State and Local Legal Center

CHAPTER 14 PUNISHMENT AND SENTENCING CHAPTER OUTLINE. I. Introduction. II. Sentencing Rationales. A. Retribution. B. Deterrence. C.

Civil Liberties & the Rights of the Accused CIVIL RIGHTS AND CIVIL LIBERTIES

SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

NC Death Penalty: History & Overview

GIVEN HIM A FAIR TRIAL, THEN HANG HIM: THE SUPREME COURT S MODERN DEATH PENALTY JURISPRUDENCE *

Chapter 9. Sentencing, Appeals, and the Death Penalty

THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF PENNSYLVANIA SENATE RESOLUTION

Sentencing: The imposition of a criminal sanction by a judicial authority. (p.260)

Chapter 6 Sentencing and Corrections

Introduction to the Presentations: The Path to an Eighth Amendment Analysis of Mental Illness and Capital Punishment

Should Capital Punishment Receive A Death Sentence? Capital punishment is one of the most controversial and polarizing topics that

Critique of the Juvenile Death Penalty in the United States: A Global Perspective

SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

Kansas Legislator Briefing Book 2014

No IN THE ALABAMA SUPREME COURT

How Administrative Law Halted the Death Penalty in Maryland

SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

Should Capital Punishment Be Considered Humane or Cruel and Unusual? Capital Punishment

Case 5:06-cr TBR Document 101 Filed 03/21/2008 Page 1 of 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY AT PADUCAH

(4) When the victim is under the age of twelve years. Lack of knowledge of the victim's age shall not be a defense.

CRAFTING THE CASE AGAINST THE AMERICAN DEATH PENALTY

Imprisonment is just one of several sentencing options.

The Evolution of Cruel and Unusual Punishment. As times change and societies adjust to those changes in their maturation process, the application

Fifth, Sixth, and Eighth Amendment Rights

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

Capital Punishment. The use of the death penalty to punish wrongdoers for certain crimes. Micki ONeal 12/5/2011

Questioning Capital Punishment: Law, Policy, and Practice James R. Acker

1/19/2004 8:03 PM HYLLENGRENMACROFINAL.DOC

Comment THE TIE GOES TO THE STATE IN KANSAS V. MARSH: A SMALL VICTORY FOR PROPONENTS OF THE DEATH PENALTY 1 I. INTRODUCTION

ACS NATIONAL CONVENTION STUDENT PANEL ON THE DEATH PENALTY THURSDAY, JULY 26 TH, 2007

Rights of the Accused

Capital Punishment and the Judicial Process

SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

AN ANALYSIS OF THE DEATH PENALTY 1. Abstract. This paper undertakes a survey of three facets of the death penalty: its

A Statistical Portrait of the Death Penalty

A Deadly Bias: First-Time Offenders and Felony Murder

Parsing Personal Predilections: A Fresh Look at the Supreme Court s Cruel and Unusual Death Penalty Jurisprudence

No IN THE. MARCUS REED, Petitioner, v. STATE OF LOUISIANA, Respondent. On Petition for a Writ of Certiorari to the Supreme Court of Louisiana

Written Materials for Supreme Court Review 8 th Amendment Instructor: Joel Oster

California holds a special distinction in regards to the practice of capital punishment.

8 th Amendment. Yes = it describes a cruel and unusual punishment No = if does not

NUMBER OF EXECUTIONS SINCE 1976: 1448

STATE V. GRELL: PLACING THE BURDEN ON DEFENDANTS TO PROVE MENTAL RETARDATION IN CAPITAL CASES

Criminal Justice in America CJ Chapter 11 James J. Drylie, Ph.D.

an Honors Project submitted by Lara E. McDonald 1702 High Gate Lane Salem, Virginia (540)

LIKE SNOW [FALLING] ON A BRANCH... : INTERNATIONAL LAW INFLUENCES ON DEATH PENALTY DECISIONS AND DEBATES IN THE UNITED STATES

RIGHTS OF THE ACCUSED. It is better to allow 10 guilty men to go free than to punish a single innocent man.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ) ) v. ) CRIMINAL NO GAO ) DZHOKHAR TSARNAEV )

Civil Liberties. Chapter 4

SEE NO EVIL, HEAR NO EVIL, SPEAK NO EVIL: AN ARGUMENT FOR A JURY DETERMINATION OF THE ENMUND/TISON CULPABILITY FACTORS IN CAPITAL FELONY MURDER CASES

The Dying Death Penalty: An Analysis of the Decreasing Number of Death Sentences in the United States and in Virginia By: Arif S.

Evolution of an Eighth Amendment Dichotomy: Substantive and Procedural Protections within the Cruel and Unusual Punishment Clause in Capital Cases

Remembering Furman s Comparative Proportionality: A Response to Smith and Staihar

The 1977 Illinois Death Penalty Statute: Does It Comply with Constitutional Standards

SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

Berkeley Journal of Criminal Law

JOINT LEGISLATIVE AUDIT AND REVIEW COMMISSION The Virginia General Assembly COMMISSION DRAFT. Review of Virginia s System of Capital Punishment

1 536 U.S. 304 (2002). 2 See id. at 321. Atkins referred to mental retardation instead of intellectual disability, see

8th and 9th Amendments. Joseph Bu, Jalynne Li, Courtney Musmann, Perah Ralin, Celia Zeiger Period 1

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Indecent and internationally illegal The death penalty against child offenders

Death Penalty. crimes. According to the Supreme Court rulings, the death penalty is not in violation of the

Florida s Criminal Justice System

Incarcerated America

AGENCY BILL ANALYSIS 2017 REGULAR SESSION WITHIN 24 HOURS OF BILL POSTING, ANALYSIS TO: and

The Constitutionality of Executing Juvenile and Mentally Retarded Offenders: A Precedential Analysis and Proposal for Reconsideration

Brett Chapman, Doctor of Philosophy, Department of Criminology and Criminal Justice

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. SC DENNIS SOCHOR, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee.

No IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES. Wyatt Forbes, III, Petitioner, Texansas, Respondent, ON WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE

Digital Georgia Law

FORTY YEARS OF DEATH: THE PAST, PRESENT, AND FUTURE OF THE DEATH PENALTY IN SOUTH CAROLINA (STILL ARBITRARY AFTER ALL THESE YEARS)

Present: Hassell, C.J., Lacy, Keenan, Koontz, Kinser, and Lemons, JJ. and Carrico, 1 S.J.

Constitutional Law Criminal Procedure Eighth Amendment Bars Execution of the Insane

In The Supreme Court of the United States

The Death Penalty is Cruel and Unusual Punishment for the Crime of Rape - Even the Rape of a Child

The Emerging Death Penalty Jurisprudence of the Roberts Court

U.S.A. Focus. In October 2013, a writ of certiorari was granted and on 27 th

Supreme Court of the United States. Patrick KENNEDY, Petitioner, v. LOUISIANA 1. No

The Effectiveness of Capital Punishment in. Reducing the Violent Crime Rate. Michael A. Pieton. Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements

Capital Punishment as a Deterrent to Crime. The majority of American people today reveal that they favor the death

An Arbitrary Death? Truman Braslaw. Capital Punishment and the Supreme Court. Harry Hirsch Primary Advisor

*Intellectual Disability The current trend among clinicians in the mental health professions is to substitute the term Intellectual Disability for Men

Mental Retardation as a Bar to the Death Penalty: Who Bears the Burden of Proof

Steps in the Process

Deadly Justice. A Statistical Portrait of the Death Penalty. Appendix B. Mitigating Circumstances State-By-State.

Criminal Law. The Basics

The Nebraska Death Penalty Study: An Interdisciplinary Symposium

Innocent of a Capital Crime: Parallels Between Innocence of a Crime and Innocence of the Death Penalty

Books: Turow, Scott. The Ultimate Punishment: A Lawyer s Reflection on the Death Penalty. Farrar, Straus and Giroux. New York

NOTHING IS CERTAIN BUT DEATH: WHY FUTURE DANGEROUSNESS MANDATES ABOLITION OF THE DEATH PENALTY

Submission to the Law Society s review of Singapore s use of the death penalty

Reforming the Appellate Process for Pennsylvania. Capital Punishment

amnesty international

CRIMINAL LAW. Death Penalty e Cruel and Unusual Punishment 0 Individualized Sentencing Determination

No. IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES OCTOBER TERM, VERNON MADISON, Petitioner, STATE OF ALABAMA, Respondent.

The Death Penalty: A Worldwide View. Dr Jack Tsen-Ta Lee School of Law, SMU 27 May 2017

RING AROUND THE JURY: REVIEWING FLORIDA S CAPITAL SENTENCING FRAMEWORK IN HURST V. FLORIDA

Nebraska Law Review. Mark Mills University of Nebraska College of Law. Volume 88 Issue 1 Article 6

Too Young to Kill? U.S. Supreme Court Treads a Dangerous Path in Roper v. Simmons

Death is Different No Longer: Graham v. Florida and the Future of Eighth Amendment Challenges to Noncapital Sentences.

Transcription:

Chapter 12 CAPITAL PUNISHMENT Introduction to Corrections CJC 2000 Darren Mingear

CHAPTER OBJECTIVES 12.1 Outline the history of capital punishment in the United States. 12.2 Explain the legal provisions for capital punishment in the United States. 12.3 Summarize the characteristics of current death-row prisoners. 12.4 Summarize the arguments for and against the use of the death penalty.

Learning Objectives After this lecture, you should be able to complete the following Learning Outcomes 12.1 Outline the history of capital punishment in the United States.

12.1 Early Period Capital Punishment History Modern Period 4

12.1 Lethal Injection (Most Common) Electrocution Gas Chamber Firing Squad/ Hanging 5

Learning Objectives After this lecture, you should be able to complete the following Learning Outcomes 12.2 Explain the legal provisions for capital punishment in the United States.

12.2 Key Terms Furman Decision Guided Discretion Gregg Decision Bifurcated Trial

12.2 Furman Decision In Furman v. Georgia (1972), the U.S. Supreme Court determined that the death penalty was cruel and unusual because it was imposed in an arbitrary and capricious manner. Source: freewebs.com

12.2 Guided Discretion A requirement that juries, after determining guilt in the first stage of a death penalty trial, consider both aggravating and mitigating circumstances during the sentencing stage of the trial. Kennedy decision Source: wheelerscornernz.blogspot.com

12.2 Gregg Decision Escaped and beaten to death in a bar fight in 1980 the night before his scheduled execution. Source: supremecourtlandmarkcases.wikispaces.com Death penalty statutes that provide for bifurcated trials and that direct juries to use guided discretion in deciding the sentence are allowed under the Constitution (1976).

12.2 Bifurcated Trial A requirement that death penalty cases have two stages, with the first stage being the traditional trial to determine guilt and a second stage to decide the sentence; death or life imprisonment. Source: adriandayton.com Source: progressivepublius.blogspot.com

12.2 Application of the Death Penalty

12.2 Key U.S. Supreme Court Cases on Capital Punishment Death penalty used in all 13 U.S. Colonies at outbreak of American Revolution Weems v. United States (1910 Louisiana ex rel. Francis v Resweber (1947) Witherspoon v. Illinois (1968) Furman v. Georgia (1972) Gregg v. Georgia (1976)

12.2 Key U.S. Supreme Court Cases on Capital Punishment, cont. Coker v. Georgia (1977) Ford v. Wainwright (1986) Thompson v. Oklahoma (1988) Atkins v. Virginia (2002) Ring v. Arizona (2002) Roper v. Simmons (2005) Kennedy v. Louisiana (2008)

Learning Objectives After this lecture, you should be able to complete the following Learning Outcomes 12.3 Summarize the characteristics of current death-row prisoners.

12.3

Learning Objectives After this lecture, you should be able to complete the following Learning Outcomes 12.4 Summarize the arguments for and against the use of the death penalty.

12.4 Key Terms Abolitionists Retentionists Proportional Retributivism The Innocence Project

12.4 Abolitionists Those favoring the abolition of the death penalty. Source: theguardian.com

12.4 Retentionists Those who favor keeping the death penalty. behance.net Source: behance.net

12.4 Proportional Retributivism Requires the worst crime in any society be punished with the worst penalty. Source: mshistorynow.mdah.state.ms.us

12.4 The Innocence Project An organization instrumental in securing DNA exonerations of persons who had served time on death row. Source: dallaslocalnews.blogspot.com

12.4 Arguments for and Against the Death Penalty Deterrence Fairness Retribution Innocence

CHAPTER SUMMARY 12.1 Capital punishment followed the British lead early on, went through a period of falling out of favor and a declaration of unconstitutional in application, to the now modern era. 12.2 Today there are restrictions on the use of the death penalty, and trials involving capital punishment as a sentence are bifurcated. 12.3 Persons who are under age 18 at the time of the commission of their crime, are mentally ill, or mentally retarded can not be given the death penalty. Most inmates on death row are white males. 12.4 Arguments for and against the death penalty are complex and numerous.