(M.D. Fla.) ("P^r^^r") (together, the "Litigation"), having applied for an order approving the

Similar documents
Case 4:13-cv AWA-LRL Document Filed 11/21/16 Page 1 of 7 PageID# 4099

Case 4:13-cv AWA-LRL Document 192 Filed 11/16/16 Page 1 of 7 PageID# 4078

Case 3:17-cv JAG Document 41 Filed 02/21/18 Page 1 of 8 PageID# 258

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

Case: 1:12-cv Document #: 576 Filed: 07/06/17 Page 1 of 15 PageID #:22601

Case 1:17-cv AT Document 77 Filed 09/14/18 Page 1 of 12

Case 3:14-cv JAG Document 193 Filed 01/30/17 Page 1 of 9 PageID# 4730 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA INDIANAPOLIS DIVISION

Case: 1:14-cv Document #: 58 Filed: 11/10/15 Page 1 of 10 PageID #:314

Case: 1:12-cv Document #: 117 Filed: 08/12/14 Page 1 of 11 PageID #:706

Case 3:15-cv RBL Document 214 Filed 05/16/18 Page 1 of 8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA. ORDER This matter came before the Court on the Plaintiffs Motion for Modification of

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case: 1:15-cv Document #: 47 Filed: 10/11/16 Page 1 of 8 PageID #:299

Case 2:17-cv GAM Document 56 Filed 03/23/18 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Case 7:16-cv KMK Document 75 Filed 10/17/17 Page 1 of 11

Case 1:12-cv VEC Document 186 Filed 05/27/15 Page 1 of 11. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK x

Case: 2:13-cv CMV Doc #: 86 Filed: 07/13/18 Page: 1 of 9 PAGEID #: 606 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Case: 1:14-cv Document #: 266 Filed: 10/05/17 Page 1 of 12 PageID #:5588

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. TJ H Case No. 5:15-cv ~jc~-gjs

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION. Plaintiffs, Case No. 1:16-CV MHC

Case 0:13-cv JIC Document 318 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/30/2016 Page 1 of 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

Case: 1:13-cv Document #: 52 Filed: 12/23/14 Page 1 of 9 PageID #:463

Case 2:08-cv SHM-dkv Document 327 Filed 06/23/14 Page 1 of 23 PageID 8969

SUSAN DOHERTY and DWIGHT SIMONSON, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, Civil Action No. l:10-cv nlh-kmw

Case 9:14-cv WPD Document 251 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/10/2017 Page 1 of 16 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

ORDER PRELIMINARILY APPROVING CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT, DIRECTING NOTICE, AND SCHEDULING FINAL APPROVAL HEARING

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case 4:13-cv AWA-LRL Document Filed 11/21/16 Page 1 of 13 PageID# 4310 EXHIBIT 7

Case 1:15-cv ELR Document 60 Filed 09/08/16 Page 1 of 21

[QIJ$&J ORDER PRELIMINARILY APPROVING SETTLEMENT AND

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

Case4:13-cv YGR Document104 Filed05/12/15 Page1 of 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Case 2:17-cv JFB-SIL Document 16 Filed 07/14/17 Page 1 of 4 PageID #: 71

Case: 4:16-cv JAR Doc. #: 97 Filed: 12/13/18 Page: 1 of 10 PageID #: 2279

Case 7:13-cv NSR-LMS Document 132 Filed 11/01/17 Page 1 of 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF JACKSON COUNTY, MISSOURI, AT INDEPENDENCE

Case 4:13-cv AWA-LRL Document 189 Filed 11/07/16 Page 1 of 6 PageID# 4011 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA

Case 2:07-cv KJD-RJJ Document 95 Filed 02/04/10 Page 1 of 9

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION ORDER PRELIMINARILY APPROVING SETTLEMENT AND PROVIDING FOR NOTICE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

[Proposedi Order Granting Motion

Case 5:05-cv RMW Document 97 Filed 08/08/2007 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Case: 4:16-cv ERW Doc. #: 95 Filed: 12/15/17 Page: 1 of 10 PageID #: 734

Case 2:15-cv MAK Document 78 Filed 10/27/15 Page 1 of 130

Case3:12-cv WHO Document276 Filed02/14/14 Page1 of 13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION

Case 2:13-md MMB Document 427 Filed 07/18/16 Page 1 of 9

Case 1:12-cv JSR Document 63 Filed 11/12/14 Page 1 of 13

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

Case 1:14-cv VEC Document 259 Filed 01/24/17 Page 1 of 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Case 1:09-cv RB-RHS Document 139 Filed 11/01/13 Page 1 of 14 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO

Case 1:15-md AJT-TRJ Document 1524 Filed 06/15/18 Page 1 of 12 PageID# 17458

Case 2:03-cv RCJ-PAL Document 2907 Filed 06/05/17 Page 1 of 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case: 1:17-cv Document #: 88 Filed: 07/06/18 Page 1 of 14 PageID #:1135

Case 0:14-cv RLR Document 227 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/18/2016 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

Case 3:13-cv HSG Document Filed 03/17/16 Page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

Case 1:09-cv SAS Document 59-1 Filed 06/28/11 Page 1 of 9 EXHIBIT A

Case 1:17-cv WTL-MPB Document 72 Filed 10/10/18 Page 1 of 16 PageID #: 736

Case 7:12-cv VB Document 109 Filed 08/01/14 Page 1 of 9

Case: 2:13-cv CMV Doc #: 92 Filed: 11/14/18 Page: 1 of 6 PAGEID #: 812 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION

Case 2:16-cv JMA-SIL Document 5 Filed 12/27/16 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 88 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI WESTERN DIVISION

Plaintiff, Defendant. for Denbury Resources, Inc. ("Denbury" or "Defendant") shares pursuant to the merger of

Case: 4:14-cv ERW Doc. #: 74 Filed: 07/13/15 Page: 1 of 9 PageID #: 523. Case No.: 4:14-cv-00159

Case 4:13-cv YGR Document 126 Filed 09/07/16 Page 1 of 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Case 6:05-cv ACC-DAB Document 56 Filed 01/12/2007 Page 1 of 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA ORLANDO DIVISION

Case 3:11-md DMS-RBB Document 108 Filed 12/18/12 Page 1 of 12

Case: 1:15-cv Document #: 109 Filed: 10/26/16 Page 1 of 9 PageID #:1837

Case 1:15-cv JFK Document 114 Filed 11/05/18 Page 1 of 12 Case 1:15-cv JFK Document Filed 10/30/18 Page 2 of 13


Case 3:15-cv VAB Document 46 Filed 05/20/16 Page 1 of 52

Case: 1:15-cv Document #: 169 Filed: 12/01/17 Page 1 of 7 PageID #:2786

Case 4:10-cv YGR Document Filed 06/17/16 Page 1 of 11

Case 2:13-md MMB Document 185 Filed 03/16/15 Page 1 of 9

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OFPENNSVLVAJ'ELA ORDER PRELIMINARILY APPROVING SETTLEMENT AND PROVIDING FOR NOTICE

Case 1:17-cv WGY Document 65 Filed 06/22/18 Page 1 of 11

Case 2:17-cv JS Document 59 Filed 05/10/18 Page 1 of 9 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Case: 1: 1 0-cv Document #: 77 Filed: 03/22/11 Page 1 of 9 PageID #:569

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA CHARLOTTE DIVISION 3:18-cv RJC

Case 0:11-cv CMA Document 161 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/18/2015 Page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

Case: 1:17-cv Document #: 25 Filed: 10/18/17 Page 1 of 8 PageID #:156 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

Case 8:11-cv JST-JPR Document Filed 08/16/13 Page 1 of 6 Page ID #:5240

Case 3:09-cv JPG-PMF Document 47 Filed 01/11/11 Page 1 of 7 Page ID #466

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION

Case 1:15-cv YK Document 84 Filed 05/31/18 Page 1 of 9 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Case 1:15-cv WHP Document 148 Filed 06/28/18 Page 1 of 14

PLAINTIFF S EXHIBIT 1

Case 2:03-cv RCJ-PAL Document 2795 Filed 02/09/17 Page 1 of 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA

Case 2:15-cv ODW-PLA Document Filed 02/15/17 Page 2 of 78 Page ID #:4469 CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND RELEASE

2:14-cv CAS-JEM Document 38 Filed 04/27/15 Page 1 of 11 Page ID #: UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Case 1:15-cv CCC Document 101 Filed 08/22/17 Page 1 of 5 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ) ) ) )

Case 1:13-cv KMW Document 37 Filed 02/19/15 Page 1 of 8 PageID: 240

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

mg Doc 4808 Filed 08/23/13 Entered 08/23/13 08:51:55 Main Document Pg 1 of 12

Transcription:

Case 4:13-cv-00003-AWA-LRL Document 188 Filed 08/18/16 Page 1 of 7 PageID# 4004 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA FRANCIS W. HOOKER, Jr., for himselfand on behalfofall similarly situated individuals, NEWPORT NEWS DIVISION V. Plaintiff, Case No.: 4:13-cv-00003 (AWA/LRL) SIRIUS XM RADIO INC. Defendant. PRELIMINARY APPROVAL ORDER The parties to the Settlement Agreement entered into on August 5, 2016 (the "Settlement Agreement") between Plaintiff Francis W. Hooker, Jr. and Defendant Sirius XM Radio Inc. ("Sirius XM") in this action (the "Action"), as well as between Sirius XM and Plaintiffs Erik Knutson, Yefim Elikman, and Anthony Parker in the related cases Knutson v. Sirius XMRadio Inc. ^ No. 12-CV-0418-AJB-DHB (S.D. Gal.) Elikman v. Sirius XM Radio Inc., No. 15-cv- 02093 (N.D. 111.) Elikman^^)\ and Parker v, Sirius XM Radio Inc.^ No. 15-CV-01710-JSM-EAJ (M.D. Fla.) ("P^r^^r") (together, the "Litigation"), having applied for an order approving the proposed settlement ofthe Litigation inaccordance with thesettlement Agreement, and thecourt having read and considered the Settlement Agreement and accompanying documents; and the parties having consented to the entry of this Order, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: L In addition to the terms defined in this Order, the Court incorporates the definitions in the Settlement Agreementfor the purposes of this Order.

Case 4:13-cv-00003-AWA-LRL Document 188 Filed 08/18/16 Page 2 of 7 PageID# 4005 2. The Court hereby preliminarily approves the Settlement Agreement and the Settlement set forth therein, subject to further consideration at the Final Approval Hearing described below. 3. All proceedings in the Action, other than proceedings necessary to carry out the Settlement Agreement, are stayed until further order. This stay shall remain in effect until one of the following events occurs: (i) the Effective Date as defined in Section 15.d of the Settlement Agreement; or (ii) one of the Parties terminates the Settlement Agreement pursuant to the terms of the Settlement Agreement. Class Members are enjoined from proceeding with any claims against any Released Person that fall within the scope of the release defined in Section 5 of the Settlement Agreement. 4. Pursuantto Rule 23ofthe Federal Rules ofcivil Procedure, for purposes ofeffectuating the Settlement only, the following Settlement Class is certified: All natural persons residing in the United States (including all territories and other political subdivisions of the United States) who (a) received programming on a promotional basis from SiriusXM in connection with the purchase or lease of a new or used vehicle that ended no later than April 5, 2016; (b) were the recipients of one or more telephone calls made by or on behalf of Sirius XM to their wireless, cell or mobile phone numbers after February 15, 2008 and before July 5, 2016; and(c) neverwere or became paying subscribers prior to July 5, 2016. Excluded from the class definition are any employees, officers, or directors of Sirius XM, and any attorneys appearing in this case, and any judge assigned to hear this case as well as their immediate family and staff 5. Solely for the purposes of the settlement, the Court preliminarily finds that the prerequisites for aclass action under Fed. R. Civ. P. 23(a) and (b)(3) have been satisfied in that: (i) the Settlement Class Members are so numerous that joinder of all Settlement Class Members is impracticable; (ii) there are questions oflaw and fact common to the Settlement Class Members; (iii) the claims of the Class Representatives are typical of the claims of the Settlement Class Members; (iv) the Class Representatives will fairly and adequately represent the interests of the

Case 4:13-cv-00003-AWA-LRL Document 188 Filed 08/18/16 Page 3 of 7 PageID# 4006 Settlement Class; (v) the questions of law and fact common to the Settlement Class Members predominate over any questions affecting only individual Settlement Class Members; and (vi) certifying the Settlement Class is superior to other available methods for the fair and efficient adjudication of the controversy. 6. The Court hereby appoints Michael A. Caddell and Cynthia B. Chapman of Caddell & Chapman; Christopher Colt North and William L. Downing of The Consumer and Employee Rights Law Firm, P.C.; Abbas Kazerounian of the Kazerouni Law Group APC, Joshua Swigart of Hyde&Swigart; Myles McGuire ofmcguire Law, P.C.,andMichaelJ. McMorrow ofmcmorrow Law, P.C. as Class Counsel, having preliminarily determined that the requirements of Rule 23(g) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure are satisfied by this appointment. 7. PlaintiffFrancis W. Hooker,Jr. and plaintiffs in the related cases Eric Knutson, Yefim Elikman, and Anthony Parker are hereby preliminarily appointed Class Representatives, solely for the purposes of effectuating the Settlement. 8. The Court preliminarily finds that (i) the proposed Settlement Agreement resulted from extensive arm's-length negotiations, including mediation infront ofanexperienced mediator; (ii) the proposed settlement was concluded after counsel for all Parties had conducted adequate investigation; and (iii) the terms of the proposed settlement are sufficiently fair, reasonable, and adequate to warrant sending the individual and publication Notice in the form attached as Exhibits B&C to the Settlement Agreement ("Notice") and holding a hearing regarding final approval of the proposed settlement. Accordingly, the Court grants preliminary approval ofthe settlement. 9. The Court approves, in form and substance, the Notice. The form and method of notice specified in the SettlementAgreement is the bestnotice practicable and shall constitute due notice ofthe Final Approval Hearing and the pendency of the Litigation to all persons entitled to receive notice, and fully satisfies the requirements of due process, Rule 23 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, and applicable law. 10. The Court further approves appointment of EpiqSystems ("Epiq") as the Settlement Administrator and Escrow Agent.

Case 4:13-cv-00003-AWA-LRL Document 188 Filed 08/18/16 Page 4 of 7 PageID# 4007 11. The Court orders that, on or before ^%^ol6\io days after entry ofthis PreliminaryApproval Order], Sirius XM shall cause notice pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1715 ("CAFA Notice") to be sent to federal and state officials. 12. The Court further orders that, on or before Sc^-he/nhe/' l^i^o(6\3q days after entry of this Preliminary Approval Order], Epiq shall cause the Individual Notice to be distributed to Settlement Class Members as set forth in the Settlement Agreement. Further, on or before iolg [45 days after entry ofthis Preliminary Approval Order], the Settlement Administratorshallpublicize the Settlement via internet and social media advertising, in a manner deemed appropriate by the Settlement Administrator, usingthe advertisements attached as Exhibit C to the Settlement Agreement, and including at leastgoogle search advertisementsand Facebook advertisements. 13. All fees, costs, and expenses incurred in identifying and notifying Settlement Class Members shall be paid from the Settlement Fund. In no event shall Sirius XM bear any responsibility for such fees, costs, or expenses. 14. At least 36 days after commencement of Notice to Class Members, Class Counsel shall cause to be served and filed a sworn statement from Epiq attesting to compliance with the notice provisions in Section 10 of the Settlement Agreement. 15. Class Counsel's Motion, on behalf of all Class Counsel for attorney's fees, costs and expenses, and on behalf of the Class Representatives for service awards, as set forth in the Settlement Agreement, shall be filed by days before the Final Approval Hearing]. 16. Plaintiffs' Motion for Final Approval of Class Action Settlement shall be filed by ^1^ 7^0f6 [10 days before the Final Approval Hearing^. 17. Any Settlement Class Member who objects to any aspect of the settlement, or who otherwise wishes to be heard, may appearin person or by his or her attorneyat the Final Approval Hearing and present evidence or argument provided the Settlement Class Member files with the Court and serves upon Class Counsel and Sirius XM's counsel, by 7j [24 days

Case 4:13-cv-00003-AWA-LRL Document 188 Filed 08/18/16 Page 5 of 7 PageID# 4008 before the Final ApprovalHearing], an objection that (i) sets forth the Settlement Class Member's full name, current address, email address and telephone number, as well as the name, address, email address and telephone number of all attorneys representing the objector; (ii) identifies the cellular telephone number of the Settlement Class Member that brings him or her withinthe scope of the Settlement Class; (iii) contains the Settlement Class Member's original signature or the signature of counsel for the Settlement Class Member; (iv) states that the Settlement Class Member objects to the Settlement, in whole or in part; (v) sets forth a statement of the legal and factual basis for the Objection; (vi) includes a list of all cases, by name and case number, in which the objector and/or his or her counsel has filed or in any way participated in financially or otherwise objections to a class action settlement in the previous five (5) years; and (vii) provides copies of any documents that the Settlement Class Member wishes to submit in support of his or her position. 18. Any Class Member who does not submit a timely Objection in complete accordance with this procedure ordered by the Court shall not be treated as having filed a valid Objection to the Settlement and shall lack standing and forever be barred from raising any objection to the Settlement and from seeking any adjudication or review of the Settlement by appeal or otherwise. 19. Plaintiff's and Sirius XM's respective Replies, if any, to any Settlement Class Members' comments or objections shall be filed by X0{6[10 days before the Final Approval Hearing]. 20. Any objections to Attorney's Fees may be supplemented by filing with the Court and delivery to Class Counsel no later than seven (7) days after filing of Class Counsel's Motion for Attorney's Fees. 21. Any Class Member who wishes to appear at the Final Approval Hearing, whether se or through counsel, must, within the time set by the Court, mail or hand-deliver to the Court a notice of appearance in the Hooker Case, provide copies of any exhibits or other documents that the Class Member intends to present or use asevidence at the hearing, provide a listofall witnesses that the Class Member intends to call to give evidence at the hearing, take all other actions or make

Case 4:13-cv-00003-AWA-LRL Document 188 Filed 08/18/16 Page 6 of 7 PageID# 4009 any additional submissions as may be ordered by the Court, and mail or hand-deliver any notice and any such exhibits, lists or other documents to Class Counsel and Sirius XM's counsel as provided in the individual or publication notices such that receipt of same by Class Counsel and Sirius XM's counsel has occurred no later than fourteen (14) days prior to the Final Approval Hearing. Any Class Member who wishes to appear at the Final Approval Hearing must provide dates at least seven (7) days in advance of the Final ApprovalHearing when the Class Member will be available for a deposition. Failure by an objector to make himself or herself available for a deposition may result in the Court striking the objection. The Court may tax the costs of anysuch discovery to the objector or the objector's counsel if the Court determines that the objection is frivolous or made for an improper purpose. No Class Member shall be permitted to raise matters at the Final Approval Hearing that the Class Member could have raised in an Objection, but failed to do so. Any Class Member who fails to comply with the procedure in this Order, the individual or publication notices, and anyother orderby the Court, shall bebarredfrom appearing at the Final Approval Hearing. 22. Ahearing will be held on [at least 100 days afterentryof this Preliminary Approval Order] at I :d0 [a.m./paru] in Courtroom ^ of this Courthouse before the undersigned, to consider (i) whether the proposed settlement is fair, reasonable, and adequate and should be finally approved; (ii) whether the Action should be dismissed with prejudice pursuant to the terms of the Settlement Agreement; (iii) whether Class Members should be bound by the release in the Settlement Agreement; (iv) the amount of Class Counsel Fees and Expenses to be awarded; (v) the amount of any service award to the Class Representatives; and(vi) any other matter that may be relevant to the settlement("final Approval Hearing"). The foregoing date, time, and place ofthe Final Approval Hearing shall belisted in the Notice, but shall be subject to change by the Court without further notice to the Class Members other than that which may be posted at the Court and on the Court's website. The Court reserves the right to approve the settlement at or after the Final Approval Hearing with such modifications as may be consented to by the Parties and without further notice to the Class.

Case 4:13-cv-00003-AWA-LRL Document 188 Filed 08/18/16 Page 7 of 7 PageID# 4010 23. Any Settlement Class Member who wishes to be excluded from the settlement must send the Settlement Administrator a letter postmarked by. [24 days before the Final Approval Hearing] that: (i) states his or her full name and address; (ii) contains the cellular telephone number as to which he or she seeks exclusion; (iii) contains the Settlement Class Member's personal and original signature or the original signature of a person previously authorized bylaw, such as a trustee, guardian or person acting under a powerof attorney, to act on behalf of the Settlement Class Member with respect to a claim or right such as those in the Litigation; and(iv) statesin plain English andunequivocally the SettlementClass Member's intent to be excluded from the Settlement Class, to be excluded from the Settlement, not to participate in the Settlement, and/or to waive all rights to the benefits of the Settlement. 24. The Court may, for good cause,extend anyof the deadlines in this Order withoutnotice to Members of the Settlement Class. 25. Sirius XM has denied wrongdoing or liability in connection with the allegations in the Litigation. As such, nothing in the Settlement Agreement constitutes an admission by Sirius XM as to the merits of the allegations made in the Litigation, the validity of anydefenses that could be or have been asserted by Sirius XM, or the appropriateness of the certification of any class other than the Settlement Class under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23 for purposes of effectuating the Settlementonly. 26. If the Settlement Agreement is terminated, the Settlement Agreement shall be void, except as expressly provided in the Settlement Agreement. 27. If any deadline in this order falls on a non-business day, then the deadline is extended until the next business day. IT IS SO ORDERED. Date Arenda L. Wright Allen United States District Judge U.S. District Judge