FILED SAN MATEO COUNTY

Similar documents
SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA County of Nevada CASE MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SHEET

E-FILED 12/26/2017 4:20 PM FRESNO COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT By: C. Cogburn, Deputy

4/19/2016 CM-110. A H ORNEY OR PARTY WI THOUT A HORNEY (Name, State Bar number, and address):

LIMITED JURISDICTION

Superior Court of California, County of San Francisco Alternative Dispute Resolution Program Information Package

COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF CALIFORNIA FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION 2. CALGUNS FOUNDATION INC., et al v. COUNTY OF SAN MATEO

SAMPLE FORM F NOTICE DESIGNATING RECORD ON APPEAL

ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION IN CIVIL CASES

a. Name of person served:

SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF ORANGE SELF-HELP CENTER

SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF ORANGE SELF-HELP CENTER ANSWERING A BREACH OF CONTRACT COMPLAINT

1. CIVIL RULES GENERAL PROVISIONS ADMINISTRATION OF CIVIL LITIGATION MARIN COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT - UNIFORM LOCAL RULES

ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION (ADR) INFORMATION PACKAGE

LOCAL RULES SUPERIOR COURT of CALIFORNIA, COUNTY of ORANGE DIVISION 3 CIVIL RULES

Citation to New Authority (Vetoed Legislation)

18 SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

TO BE FILED IN THE COURT OF APPEAL

AS MODIFIED. Attorneys for Plaintiff, STERLING SAVINGS BANK UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF ORANGE SELF-HELP CENTER ALTERNATIVE WRIT OF MANDATE NON DUI. Self Help Center Loca ons:

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, CENTRAL DISTRICT. Santa Clara Case No CV INCLUDED ACTIONS:

PREPARATION OF A TRIAL STATEMENT

Purpose of Mandatory Fee Arbitration

Case 2:18-cv R-AGR Document 7 Filed 02/05/18 Page 1 of 2 Page ID #:26

SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF ORANGE CENTRAL JUSTICE CENTER

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA - SACRAMENTO DIVISION } } } } } } } } } } } } } } /

SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF ORANGE SELF-HELP CENTER WAGE GARNISHMENT. Self Help Center Loca ons:

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES - CENTRAL DISTRICT ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Petition for Relief Packet

PARKER, et al., THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, et al., STIPULATION FOR SECOND EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE BRIEF PURSUANT TO RULES OF COURT, RULE 8.

) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION. Plaintiffs, Defendant.

Actions must be set down for trial within two years of being defended.

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

IN THE FAMILY DIVISION OF THE SECOND JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF WASHOE., Plaintiff/Petitioner, Dept. No.

Case 3:13-cv EMC Document 736 Filed 07/29/16 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT. No John Teixeira; et al., Plaintiffs/Appellants,

Case M:06-cv VRW Document 424 Filed 02/04/2008 Page 1 of 5

CALIFORNIA RULES OF COURT Title 3. Civil Rules Division 8. Alternative Dispute Resolution Chapter 1. General Provisions

CIVIL HARASSMENT RENEWAL

If you are applying for a government-issued license, certificate, or permit, you must disclose your conviction and expungement.

LAWYER REFERRAL SERVICE SAN MATEO COUNTY BAR ASSOCIATION 333 BRADFORD STREET, SUITE 200 REDWOOD CITY, CA (650)

) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case 2:07-cv TJH-CT Document 56 Filed 11/29/2007 Page 1 of 6

Woods et al v. Vector Marketing Corporation Doc. 276 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Location (address): 1138 Howard Street, San Francisco CA (877)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA (OAKLAND DIVISION)

Effective Case Management for City Attorneys

)

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF KERN, NORTH KERN DISTRICT ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

DeNault s Application for Employment 2019

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA

SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES CHAPTER THREE CIVIL DIVISION RULES...39

IN THE TENTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF CHURCHILL

Case 2:12-cv PSG-RZ Document 1 Filed 10/10/12 Page 1 of 9 Page ID #:8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CHAPTER 4 CIVIL CASE MANAGEMENT

DEC 1 i1z ) FOR DEFENDANTS DEMURRER TO ) FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT ) ) Time: 439-pm.3) C.D. Michel -

CIV CIV DS ORDR Order GRANTING PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF

In the Supreme Court of the State of California

WAGE DEDUCTION Instructions for Creditors Read 735 ILCS 5/ et seq Illinois State Statues

SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF MERCED. Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) Information Guide

This matter came on regularly before this Court for hearings on October 7,2004 and on April

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT. District of Oregon. Plaintiff(s), vs. Case No: 6:07-CV-6149-HO. Defendant(s). Civil Case Assignment Order

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF ORANGE SELF-HELP CENTER RESPONDING TO ELDER/DEPENDENT ADULT ABUSE RESTRAINING ORDER

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT. Plaintiffs and Appellants, Defendants and Res ondents.

Case 3:17-cv Document 1 Filed 01/28/17 Page 1 of 7 SAN FRANCISCO

Case 2:14-cv WBS-EFB Document 14 Filed 08/07/14 Page 1 of 5

SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES. Plaintiff{s),

SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF ORANGE SELF-HELP CENTER MODIFICATION OF A CIVIL RESTRAINING ORDER. Self Help Center Loca ons:

Case 1:08-cv EGS Document 19 Filed 12/12/08 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Los Angeles Superior Court Limited Jurisdiction Department 77

DEFAULT PACKET P-1. The District Court Filing Office is located on the first floor at: 75 Court Street Reno, NV 89501

Case 3:08-cv BEN-BLM Document 3 Filed 06/17/2008 Page 1 of 2

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION

CLAIM FOR MONEY OR DAMAGES r\eceiyeu WARNING liodesto CITY CLERK Be sure your claim is filed with the' -.. ment Code Section 910 et seq)

No [DC# CV MJJ] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEAL FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT. RUSSELL ALLEN NORDYKE; et al., Plaintiffs - Appellants,

HOW TO RESCHEDULE A HEARING OR TRIAL: MOTION TO CONTINUE

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO

SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES CHAPTER FIVE FAMILY DIVISION RULES...124

TAKE ACTION NOW TO PROTECT YOUR INTERESTS!

Case 1:12-cv LJO-SKO Document 10 Filed 04/16/13 Page 1 of 2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, FRESNO DIVISION

PART THREE CIVIL CASES

DEPARTMENT C26 GUIDELINES HONORABLE GREGORY H. LEWIS

PLACER COUNTY ARBITRATION PROGRAM REQUEST TO ARBITRATE AND AGREEMENT TO ARBITRATE

SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF ORANGE SELF-HELP CENTER

APPLICATION FOR EMPLOYMENT CALIFORNIA. Name (Print) Last First Middle. Street and Number City State Zip Code Years Months

INSTRUCTIONS TO RESPONDENT

THE COURTS. Title 249 PHILADELPHIA RULES

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO

nee eaven JAN 0 5%018 SAN MATEO COUNTY Joanna Ghosh (SBN

SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF SAN MATEO Hall of Justice and Records 400 County Center Redwood City, California

SUPERIOR COURT STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF CONTRA COSTA

[Dist Ct. No.: 3:12-CV WHO] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEAL FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT. JOHN TEIXEIRA; et al., Plaintiffs - Appellants, vs.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. [Complaint Filed 11/24/2010] [Alameda County Case No.

Transcription:

ATTORNEY OR PARTY W1TI-fOUT ATTORNEY (Neme, StaL8arnumber. a,rd address): JOHN C. BEIERS, COUNTY COUNSEL, SBN 144282 BY: DAVID A. SILBERMAN, DEPUTY, SBN 211708 HALL OF JUSTICE AND RECORDS 400 COUNTY CENTER, 6TH FLOOR REDWOOD CITY, CA 94063 TELEPHONE NO.: (650) 363-4749 FAX NO, (OptonaI): (650) 363-4034 E-MAIL ADDRESS (Optional): dsilbermanco.smcgov.org ATTORNEY FOR (Namer COUNTY OF SAN MATEO SUPERIOR COURT OF CAUFORNIA, COUNTY OF SAN MATEO STREET ADDRESS: HALL OF JUSTICE AND RECORDS MAILING ADDRESS: 400 COUNTY CENTER CITY AND ZIP CODE: REDWOOD CITY, CA 94063 BRANCH NAME: PLAINTIFFIPETrrIONER:ULYSSESS S. GRANT EARLY, et al. FOR OUAT USE ONLY FILED SAN MATEO COUNTY CM-I 10 DEFENDANTIRESPONDENT:COUNTY OF SAN MATEO NUMBEft CASE MANAGEMENT STATEM ENT (Check one): L1 UNLIMITED CASE LIMITED CASE CIV 509185 (Amount demanded (Amount demanded is $25,000 exceeds $25,000) or less) A CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE is scheduled as follows: Date: June 8, 2012 Time: 9:00 a.m. Dept.: 7 Div.: Room: Address of court (if different from the address above): LEI Notice of Intent to Appear by Telephone, by (name): instructions: All applicable boxes must be checked, and the specified information must be provided. Party or parties (answer one): a. This statement is submitted by party (name): b. L1 This statement is submitted jointly by parties (names): Ulysses S. Grant Early IV, et al. and County of San Mateo 2. Complaint and cross-complaint (to be answered by plaintiffs and cross-complainants only) a. The complaint was filed on (date): October 20, 2011 b. The cross-complaint, if any, was filed on (date): 3. Service (to be answered by plaintiffs and cross-complainants only) a. L1 All parties named in the complaint and cross-complaint have been served, have appeared, or have been dismissed. b. The following parties named in the complaint or cross-complaint (1) have not been served (specify names and explain why not): (2) fl have been served but have not appeared and have not been dismissed (specil, names): (3) LZ have had a default entered against them (specify names): c. LZJ The following additional parties may be added (specify names, nature of involvement in case, and date by which they may be served): 4. Description of case a. Type of case in LiE1 complaint LEI cross-complaint (Describe, including causes of action): Plaintiffs claim that the County Ordinance that prohibits firearms in County Parks is preempted by State law. Form Adopted tot MandatOry Use Jucticial Cauriocl of Calilomja CM-110[Rov. July 1.20111 So Page I o 5 CaL Rulesol Court rules 3.720-3.730

I PLAINTIFF/PETITIONER: ULYSSESS S. GRANT EARLY, et al. CASE NUMBER: LDEFENDANT/RESPONDENT: COUNTY OF SAN ThO CIV 509185 CM-I 10 4. b. Provide a brief statement of the case, including any damages. (If personal injury damages are sought, specify the injury and damages claimed, including medical expenses to date findicate source and amount], estimated Mum medical expenses, lost earnings to date, and estimated future lost earnings. If equitable relief is sought, describe the nature of the relief.) Plaintiffs claim that the County Ordinance that prohibits firearms in County Parks is preempted by State law. (If more space is needed, check this box and attach a page designated as Attachment 4b.) 5. Jury or nonjury trial The party or parties request [Z] a jury trial [1 a nonjury trial. (if more than one party, provide the name of each party requesting a juty trial): 6. Trial date a. The trial has been set for (date): b. No trial date has been set. This case will be ready for trial within 12 months of the date of the filing of the complaint (if not, explain): Case will not be at issue, if at all, for months..c. Dates on which parties or attorneys will not be available for trial (specify dates and explain reasons for unavailability): Parties ask that the Case Management Conference be continued to trail the Demurrer hearing; a date in late July. 7. Estimated length of trial The party or parties estimate that the trial will take (check one): a. days (specify number): b. hours (short causes) (specify): Likely resolved at a hearing of some kind. 8. Trial representation (to be answered for each party) The party or parties will be represented at trial [11 by the attorney or party listed in the caption El by the following: a. Attorney: b. Firm: c. Address: d. Telephone number: f. Fax number: e. E-mail address: g. Party represented: El Additional representation is described in Attachment 8. 9. Preference This case is entitled to preference (specify code section). 10. Alternative dispute resolution (ADR) a. ADR information package. Please note that different ADR processes are available in different courts and communities; read the ADR information package provided by the court under rule 3.221 for information about the processes available through the court and community programs in this case. (1) For parties represented by counsel: Counsel iil has has not provided the ADR information package identified in rule 3.221 to the client and reviewed ADR options with the dient. (2) For self-represented parties: Party El has El has not reviewed the ADR information package identified in rule 3.221. b. Referral to judicial arbitration or civil action mediation (if available). (1) L1 This matter is subject to mandatory judicial arbitration under Code of Civil Procedure section 1141.11 or to civil action mediation under Code of Civil Procedure section 1775.3 because the amount in controversy does not exceed the statutory limit. (2) Plaintiff elects to refer this case to judicial arbitration and agrees to limit recovery to the amount specified in Code of Civil Procedure section 1141.11. (3) This case is exempt from judicial arbitration under rule 3.811 of the California Rules of Court or from civil action mediation under Code of Civil Procedure section 1775 et seq. (ech5, exemption): M.110 [rievjuiy 1,2011] MANAGEMENT STATEMENT Page 2t5

PLAINTIFF/PETITIONER: ULYSSESS S. GRANT EARLY, et al CASE NUM8EF )EFENDANTIRESPONDENT: COUNTY OF SAN MATEO CIV 509185 CM-I 10 10. c. Indicate the ADR process or processes that the party or parties are willing to participate in, have agreed to participate in, or have already participated in (check all that apply and prowde the specified information): The party or parties completing this form are willing to participate in the foljowing ADR processes (check all that apply): If the party or parties completing this form in the case have agreed to participate in or have already completed an ADR process or processes, indicate the status of the processes (attach a copy of the parties ADF? stipulation): (1) Mediation Mediation session not yet scheduled Mediation session scheduled for (date): EZI Agreed to complete mediation by (date): [El Mediation completed on (date):, (2) Settlement conference fl Settlement conference not yet scheduled Settlement conference scheduled for (date): Agreed to complete settlement conference by (date): fl Settlement conference completed on (date): (3) Neutral evaluation Neutral evaluation not yet scheduled Neutral evaluation scheduled for (date): Agreed to complete neutral evaluation by (date): El Neutral evaluation completed on (date): EE Judicial arbitration not yet scheduled (4) Nonbinding judicial LII Judicial arbitration scheduled for (date): arbitration Agreed to complete judicial arbitration by (date): Judicial arbitration completed on (date): (5) Binding private arbitration Private arbitration not yet scheduled Private arbitration scheduled for (date): El Agreed to complete private arbitration by (date): Private arbitration completed on (date): (6) Other (speciij): El LII ADR session not yet scheduled El ADR session scheduled for (date): El Agreed to complete ADR session by (date): El ADR completed on (date): CM-i 10 trev. July 1,20111 Page 3 of S

PLAINTIFF/PETITIONER: ULYSSESS S. GRANT EARLY, et al. ICASE NUMBER: CM-tin LDEFENDANTJRESPONDENT: COUNTY OF SAN MATEO C1V 509185 11. Insurance a. Lrisurance carrier, if any, for party filing this statement (name): b. Reservation of rights: Yes No c. Coverage issues will significantly affect resolution of this case (explain): FE] 12. Jurisdiction Indicate any matters that may affect the court s jurisdiction or processing of this case and describe the status. Bankruptcy Status: [El Other (specil): 13. Related consolidation, and coordination a. There are companion, underlying, or related cases. (1) Name of case: (2) Name of court (3) Case number: (4) Status: Additional cases are described in Attachment 13a. b. A motion to consolidate coordinate will be filed by (name party): cases, 14. Bifurcation The party or parties intend to file a motion for an order bifurcating, severing, or coordinating the following issues or causes of action (specify moving party, type of motion, and reasons): 15. Other motions The party or parties expect to file the following motions before trial (specify moving party, type of motion, and issues): Demurrer pending; on validity [] if not granted, Motion for Summary Judgment of ordinance. 16. Discovery a. The party or parties have completed all discovery. b. The following discovery will be completed by the date specified (descnbe all anticipated discovery): DescriOtion CE] [] Both Depositions and written, if necessary December 30, 2012 c. The following discovery issues, including issues regarding the discovery of electronically stored information, are anticipated (specify): CM-i 10 IRev. Jut 1. 2O1i Page4of 5

r PLAJNTIFF/pflT)ONER: ULYSSESS S. GRANT EARLY, et al. CASE NUMBER: COUNTY OF SAN LDEFENDANT/RESPONDENT; MATEO CIV 509185 CM-Il 0 17. Economic litigation a. This is a limited civil case (i.e., the amount demanded is $25000 or less) and the economic litigation procedures in Code of Civil Procedure sections 90-98 will apply to this case. b. E This is a limited civil case and a motion to withdraw the case from the economic litigation procedures or for additional discovery will be filed (if checked, explain specifically why economic litigation procedures relating to discovery or trial should not apply to this case): 18. Other issues The party or parties request that the following additional matters be considered or determined at the case management conference (specify): fl 19. Meet and confer a. The party or parties have met and conferred with all parties on all subjects required by rule 3.724 of the California Rules of Court (if not, explain): b. After meeting and conferring as required by rule 3.724 of the California Rules of Court, the parties agree on the following (specify): 20. Total number of pages attached (if any): -0- I am completely familiar with this case and will be fully prepared to discuss the status of discovery and alternative dispute resolution, as well as other issues raised by this statement, and will possess the authority to enter into stipulations on these issues at the time of the case management conference, including the written authority of the party where required. Date: May 8, 2012 DAVID A. STLBERMAN (TYPE OR PRINT NAME) (SIONATURE OF PARTY OR ATTORNEY) DONALD E.J. KILMER. JR. (TYPE OR PRINT NAME) fl (SIGNATURE OF PARTY OR ATTORNEY) Additional signatures are attached. CM-i 10 (Rev, J4y 1,2011] PageS of 5

f PLAIN11FF/PETITIONER: ULYSSESS S. GRANT EARLY, at a.!. CASS NU#4BSk 1àEFENDANT1RESPONDENT: COUNTY OF SAN MATEO C1V 509185 CM-lb 17. Economic litigation a. Th is a limited civil case (i.e., the amount demanded is $25,000 or less) and the economic litigation procedures In Code of CMI Procedure sections 90-98 will apply to this case. b. [Z This is a limited civil case and a motion to withdraw the case from the economic litigation procedures or for additional discovery will be fled (ifchecked, explain specifically why economic litigation procedures relating to discovery ortrial should not apply to this case): 18. Other Issues The party or parties request that the following additional matters be considered or determined at the case management conference (specify): 19. Meetand confer a. (J The party or parties have met and conferred with all parties on all subjects required by rule 3.724 of the California Rules of Court (if noi explain): b. After meeting arid conferring as required by rule 3.724 of the California Rules of Court. the parties agree on the following (specify): 20. Total number of pages attached (if any):. I am completely familiar with this case and will be fully prepared to discuss the status of discovery and alternative dispute resolution, as well as other issues raised by this statement, and wl possess the authority to enter Into stipulations on these Issues at the time of the case management conference, including the wtitten authority of the party where required. Date: May 8, 2012 DAVED A. SILBERMAN (TYPE OR PRINT NAJ. ) )\ / -... 1) Ck%,f11Z 1 JA (SGNATUR5 OF PAkTY DONALD E.J. KILMBR1R. (8TUREOFPRTY [ZJ AdclWonal signatures are attached. A CM-t1OERw.JuW1.ZII1)

1 PROOF OF SERVICE 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 I do hereby declare that I am a citizen of the United States employed in the County of San Mateo, over 18 years old and that my business address is 400 County Center, Redwood City, California. I ant not a party to the within action. On May 9, 2012, I served the following document(s): JOINT on all other parties to this action by placing a true copy of said document(s) in a sealed envelope in the following manner: (BY U.S. MAIL) by placing a true copy of said document(s) in a sealed envelope(s) addressed as shown below for collection and mailing at Redwood City, California following our ordinary. business practices. I am readily familiar with this office s practice for collecting and processing correspondence for mailing. On the same day that correspondence is placed for collection and mailing, it is deposited in the ordinary course of business with the United States Postal Service in a sealed envelope with postage fully prepaid. (BY PERSONAL SERVICE) I caused such envelope(s) to be hand-delivered to the addressee(s) shown below. A proof of service signed by the authorized courier will be filed forthwith. 14 15 16 17 18 [] (STATE) I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing is true and correct. 19 20 21 Early et al. v. County of San Mateo, et al. Case No. CIV 509185 NAME ANI) ADDRESS OF EACH PERSON TO WHOM SERVICE WAS MAI)E 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Donald E.J. Kilmer, Jr. LAW OFFICES OF DONALD KILMER 1645 Willow Street, Suite 150 San Jose, CA 95125 Attorneys for Plaintiffs PROOF OF SERVICE