State Court Processing Statistics: Background, Current Findings, and Future Directions

Similar documents
BJS Court Related Statistical Programs Presentation

Detention-release outcomes for State court felony defendants in the 75 largest counties,

Pretrial Release of Felony Defendants, 1992

Felony Defendants in Large Urban Counties, 2000

THE EFFECTIVENESS AND COST OF SECURED AND UNSECURED PRETRIAL RELEASE IN CALIFORNIA'S LARGE URBAN COUNTIES:

PRETRIAL JUSTICE IN AMERICA:

Sentencing in Colorado

Bail Right to bail; recognizance or unsecured appearance bond. Secured bonds. Factors to be considered in determining conditions of release.

Proposals for Improving the U.S. Pretrial System

Probation and Parole Violators in State Prison, 1991

State Court Processing of Domestic Violence Cases

Jail: Who is in on bail?

COUNTY OF ORANGE. PRETRIAL RISK ASSESSMENT PAPER PILOT STUDY 1 RESULTS SUMMARY (Pretrial Supervision Meeting)

Profile of Intimate Partner Violence Cases in Large Urban Counties

Offender Population Forecasts. House Appropriations Public Safety Subcommittee January 19, 2012

Taking Bail Notes. 1. Introduction. a. Importance of Pretrial Release

DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY RESPONSE TO HOUSE CONCURRENT RESOLUTION NO. 62 TWENTY-FIRST LEGISLATURE, 2002

Promoting Second Chances: HR and Criminal Records

Summary and Interpretation of the Federal Bureau of Investigation s Uniform Crime Report, 2005

Court Watch NOLA 2015 Data & Statistics

Independent and Third-Party Municipal Candidates. City Council Election Reform Task Force April 8, :00 p.m.

Barbados. POLICE 2. Crimes recorded in criminal (police) statistics, by type of crime including attempts to commit crimes

Seek, Test, Treat and Retain for Criminal Justice Populations: Data Harmonization Measure

NEW YORK CITY CRIMINAL JUSTICE AGENCY, INC.

[Bail] Pretrial release. A. Hearing. (1) Time. The court shall conduct a hearing under this rule and issue an order setting conditions of

Juveniles Prosecuted in State Criminal Courts

Bail Reform in NJ HOW WILL IT AFFECT FOREIGN NATIONALS? NO ONE REALLY KNOWS HOW IT WILL AFFECT ANYONE YET!

Criminal Justice A Brief Introduction


IC ARTICLE 30. JUVENILE LAW: JUVENILE COURT JURISDICTION

Wyoming Joint Judiciary Interim Committee

FREQUENCY OF SIGNATURE BONDS IN DANE COUNTY CRIMINAL CASES:

PUBLIC WELFARE FOUNDATION FINAL/INTERIM REPORT GRANT # # DATE OF SUBMISSION December 3, 2013

Overcrowding Alternatives

Ventura County Probation Agency. Juvenile Detention Alternative Initiatives and Pretrial Services

Are Courts Required to Impose the Least Restrictive Conditions of Bail? Are Courts Required to Consider Community Safety When Imposing Bail?

Pretrial release. A. Hearing. (1) Time. If a case is initiated in the district court, and the conditions of release have not been set by the

MICHIGAN PRISONERS, VIOLENT CRIME, AND PUBLIC SAFETY: A PROSECUTOR S REPORT. PAAM Corrections Committee. Prosecuting Attorneys Association of Michigan

Charlotte-Mecklenburg 2015 Criminal Justice System Public Perceptions Study Quantitative Report

NORTH CAROLINA RACIAL JUSTICE IMPROVEMENT PROJECT: YEAR 2 EVALUATION FINDINGS. PREPARED FOR: The American Bar Association, Criminal Justice Section

Identifying Chronic Offenders

MECKLENBURG COUNTY PRETRIAL RISK ASSESSMENT & PRAXIS. Instruction Manual

Winnebago County s Criminal Justice System: Trends and Issues Report

A Profile of Women Released Into Cook County Communities from Jail and Prison

NC General Statutes - Chapter 15A Article 26 1

Sentencing Chronic Offenders

Bail, Innocence and Public Safety

Punitive damages were sought in 12% of the estimated

Breakdown of the Types of Specific Criminal Convictions Associated with Criminal Aliens Placed in a Non-Custodial Setting in Fiscal Year 2015

Policy Simulations of Alternative Options To Reduce the Orleans Parish Prison Ten-Year Projection

(A) subject to the condition that the person not commit a Federal, State, or local crime during the period of release

CALIFORNIA S 58 CRIME RATES: REALIGNMENT AND CRIME IN 2012

Virginia s Nonviolent Offender Risk Assessment

Winnebago County s Criminal Justice System: Trends and Issues Report

REPORT # O L A OFFICE OF THE LEGISLATIVE AUDITOR STATE OF M INNESOTA PROGRAM EVALUATION R EPORT. Chronic Offenders

SUPERIOR AND DISTRICT COURT DIVISIONS ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER

Justice Reinvestment in Oklahoma. Detailed Analysis. October 17, Council of State Governments Justice Center

County of Santa Clara Office of the District Attorney

Domestic Violence Case Processing in New York City

Who Is In Our State Prisons?

Who Is In Our State Prisons? From the Office of California State Senator George Runner

Standards. SSCG21 The student will describe the causes and effects of criminal activity.

Alameda County Probation Department A Look into Probation Monthly Statistical Report January 2012

Chapter 8. Pretrial and Trial Procedures

The True Cost of Justice in Marion County

Immigrant Detention: Can ICE Meet Its Legal Imperatives and Case Management Responsibilities?

Chapter 148. State Prison System. Article 1. Organization and Management Repealed by Session Laws 1973, c. 1262, s. 10.

Unintended Impacts of AB 109, Proposition 47 & 57

CERTIFICATION PROCEEDING

BAIL REFORM CONSENSUS STUDY. Prepared for Winter Workshop January 26, 2019 Updated February 2019

Course Court Systems and Practices. Unit X Pre-trial

HALIFAX COUNTY PRETRIAL RELEASE RISK ASSESSMENT PILOT PROJECT

Background and Trends

CHIEF JUDGE ORDER SETTING FORTH BOND GUIDELINES

The Florida House of Representatives

EMPLOYMENT APPLICATION WATER PIK, INC. a subsidiary of CHURCH & DWIGHT CO., INC. An Equal Opportunity Employer

PC: , 457.1, 872, CVC: (C) TITLE 8: INMATE RELEASE I. PURPOSE:

Reporting and Criminal Records

HARRIS COUNTY CRIMINAL COURTS AT LAW

PRETRIAL SERVICES. Why Sheriffs Should Champion Pretrial Services

Colorado Legislative Council Staff

The court process CONSUMER GUIDE. How the criminal justice system works. FROM ATTORNEY GENERAL JEREMIAH W. (JAY) NIXON

How States Can Achieve More Effective Public Safety Policies

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA. Comments of Circuit Judge Robert L. Doyel

DESCHUTES COUNTY ADULT JAIL L. Shane Nelson, Sheriff Jail Operations Approved by: March 22, 2016 FORCED RELEASES

CRIMINAL DEFENSE COURT PROCESS

State Issue 1 The Neighborhood Safety, Drug Treatment, and Rehabilitation Amendment

Office Of The District Attorney

crossroads AN EXAMINATION OF THE JAIL POPULATION AND PRETRIAL RELEASE

McHenry County s Criminal Justice System: Trends and Issues Report

Sentencing Survey of Colorado District and County Court Judges

Title 15: COURT PROCEDURE -- CRIMINAL

EVALUATION OF THE MARYLAND VIOLENCE PREVENTION INITIATIVE (VPI) 2013

COMMITMENT RATES VARY SIGNIFICANTLY BETWEEN COUNTIES SUGGESTING THAT WHERE A CHILD LIVES MATTERS MORE THAN WHAT HE OR SHE HAS DONE

Bail: An Abridged Overview of Federal Criminal Law

County of Santa Clara Report Fiscal Year: 2018 Report Month: July

Objectives. A very brief history 1/26/18. Jamie Markham. Grid fluency Handbook and form familiarity Avoid common errors

EVIDENCE BASED DECISION MAKING UNIVERSAL ASSESSMENT TOOL

Bond Analysis Public Safety

Slovenia. 1. Police personnel, by sex, and financial resources, Rate 2005 Rate 2006

Transcription:

State Court Processing Statistics: Background, Current Findings, and Future Directions BJS/JRSA National Conference October 28, 2010 Thomas H. Cohen, J.D., Ph.D. BJS Statistician

State Court Processing Statistics (SCPS) State Court Processing Statistics (SCPS) project primary data collection program for examining felony case processing in state courts. SCPS provides individualized case processing data on defendants charged with a felony in a sample of 40 of the nation s 75 most populous counties. SCPS data collection has occurred every two years from 1988 2006. SCPS data are collected through a variety of agencies including courts, pretrial offices, local jails, and state criminal history data files.

State Court Processing Statistics (SCPS) Sampling Framework State Court Processing Statistics (SCPS) uses a two stage stratified sampling strategy. 1 st stage: 40 of the nation s 75 most populous counties are selected to participate in the study. 2 nd stage: Counties provide data for defendants brought into court on a felony charge on randomly selected business days in May. Felony defendants are tracked from May of every even numbered year until May 31 st of the following year. For 2006, data collected on 16,211 felony defendants were weighted to represent 58,100 felony defendants in the nation s 75 most populous counties.

State Court Processing Statistics (SCPS) data elements Data elements collected through SCPS include: Current arrest charges (number, type) Demographic characteristics (gender, race/ethnicity, age) Criminal history (prior arrests, prior convictions, prior FTAs) Pretrial release (type of release, bail amounts) Pretrial misconduct (failure to appear, re-arrest) Adjudication outcomes (method of conviction, conviction offense) Sentencing outcomes (type and length of prison, jail, or probation sentence)

Primary reports published from SCPS data collection include Reports summarizing SCPS data Felony Defendants in Large Urban Counties Topical reports using SCPS data Pretrial Release of Felony Defendants in State Courts Violent Felons in Large Urban Counties Defense Counsel in Criminal Cases SCPS spin-offs State Court Processing of Domestic Violence Cases Juvenile Felony Defendants in State Courts BJS reports can be accessed at http://bjs.ojp.usdoj.gov/

Drug trafficking, other drug, and assault are the most common offenses; less than 5% charged with rape or murder Most serious charges for felony defendants, 2006 Other drug Drug trafficking Assault Larceny/theft Burglary Robbery Motor vehicle theft Rape Murder N = 58,100 0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% Percent of felony defendants * Not all categories shown

Nearly 80% of all felony defendants have prior arrest record and 60% have prior conviction record; rape defendants have less substantial criminal histories Percent of felony defendants with Most serious At least one At least one arrest charge All offenses prior arrest 77 % prior conviction 61 % Violent 71 % 53 % Assault 74 56 Robbery 73 54 Rape 56 31 Property 74 % 58 % Drug 81 % 66 % Public-order 81 % 66 %

Nearly 60% of defendants were released pretrial; pretrial release less common for violent than other offense types Most serious Defendants released pretrial, 2006 arrest charge Released Detained All offenses 58 % 42 % Violent 52 % 48 % Robbery 39 61 Rape 57 43 Assault 59 41 Property 59 % 41 % Drug 60 % 40 % Public-order 62 % 38 %

Half of detained murder defendants denied bail; Majority of other detained defendants couldn t make bail Pretrial detention of felony defendants, 2006 All offenses Murder Denied bail Held on bail Robbery Rape Burglary Assault Drug trafficking Larceny/theft 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% Percent of detained defendants

Median bail amounts five times higher for released compared to detained felony defendants Most serious Median bail amounts set arrest charge Released Detained All offenses $5,000 $25,000 Violent $9,500 $50,000 Rape 20,000 100,000 Robbery 10,000 50,000 Assault 7,500 39,500 Property $5,000 $15,000 Drug $5,000 $20,000 Public-order $5,000 $20,000

Defendants with more serious criminal histories are less likely to be released Criminal history Percent of felony defendants Released Detained Criminal justice status No active status 65 % 35 % On pretrial release 53 47 On probation 34 66 On parole 14 86 Court arrest & appearance history No prior arrests 75 % 25 % Prior arrest record without FTA 61 39 Prior arrest record with FTA 51 49 Number of prior convictions No prior convictions 74 % 26 % 1 61 39 2-4 52 48 5 or more 39 61

Surety bond and release on own recognizance are the most common types of pretrial release

From 1996 through 1998, surety bond surpasses release on recognizance as the most common form of release

With exception of robbery, pretrial misconduct less common among defendants charged with violent offenses Most serious Percent with arrest charge pretrial misconduct All offenses 33 % Violent 26 % Robbery 39 Assault 25 Rape 20 Property 35 % Drug 37 % Public-order 31 %

Violent defendants more likely to make court appearances than property or drug defendants; re-arrest rates similar for violent and property defendants Percent of released defendants who Most serious arrest charge All offenses Failed to appear 18 % Rearrest 18 % Violent 11 % 16 % Robbery 16 27 Assault 10 15 Rape 6 9 Property 20 % 18 % Drug 21 % 20 % Public-order 16 % 15 %

Defendants released on surety bond failed to appear less frequently compared to those released on ROR; no difference in re-arrest for defendants released on surety bond or ROR Percent of released defendants who - Types of Failed pretrial release to appear Rearrest Release on recognizance 26 % 17 % Conditional release 22 15 Deposit bond 22 14 Full cash bond 20 15 Surety bond 18 16

Detained felony defendants convicted at higher rates compared to released felony defendants Percentage of defendants convicted of a felony, by detention and release outcome, 2006 Detained defendants All offenses Public-order offenses Property offenses Drug offenses Violent offenses 68% 73% 71% 69% 63% Released defendants All offenses Public-order offenses Drug offenses Property offenses 47% 51% 51% 46% Violent offenses 38%

Pretrial release rates differ among the counties selected to participate in SCPS, 2006 Percentage of felony defendants released by County (State) selected SCPS countes, 2006 Kings (NY) 83 % Bronx (NY) 79 Broward (FL) 76 Saint Louis (MO) 73 Baltimore County (MD) 72 Dallas (TX) 45 % Ventura (CA) 41 Harris (TX) 37 Orange (CA) 32 Los Angeles (CA) 31

Some SCPS counties rely primarily on surety bond; while others utilize deposit, conditional, and ROR release methods Tarrant (TX) Hillsborough (FL) El Paso (TX) Broward (FL) Orange (FL) Type of pretrial release among selected SCPS counties, 2006 Essex (NJ) Pima (AZ) Hamilton (OH) Milwaukee (WI) Cook (IL) 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% Surety bond Other cash Non-financial

SCPS limitations SCPS provides estimates only of FELONY case processing in the nation s 75 most populous counties. Data not collected on a variety of defendant characteristics that could influence pretrial phase: Community ties Employment status Martial status Income levels Residency Drug, alcohol, or mental health history Illegal immigrant status No information on how a defendant is returned to court Returned through voluntary surrender, law enforcement agent, or bail bondsmen

SCPS county profile survey County profile survey will attempt to: Assess county capacity to provide electronic data. Evaluate expansion of SCPS beyond the current sample. Estimate possibility of obtaining misdemeanor data. County profile survey will attempt to assess potential for collecting more information on pretrial release. Determine capacities for collecting details from pretrial intake interviews. Evaluate conditions attached to pretrial release decisions. Measure how defendants are released. Assess how defendants are brought back to court.

Contact information Thomas H. Cohen, J.D., Ph.D. Statistician, Prosecution and Adjudication Statistics Unit Thomas.h.Cohen@usdoj.gov (202) 514-8344 Duren Banks, Ph.D. Chief, Prosecution and Adjudication Statistics Unit Duren.Banks@usdoj.gov (202) 305-1355