General Chapters Overview

Similar documents
USP 37-NF 32 Commentary

Comment Lifecycle. Jessica Simpson, M.P.H. Manager, Compendial Operations

ASME Codes and Standards. Development Committee Procedures. With Supplemental Requirements For Committees. Under the Jurisdiction of the

SOP TITLE: Process for Creating Guidance SOP NO.: REVISION NO: 0.1

SUMMARY OF CHANGES IN ISO 9001:2008 (DRAFT INTERNATIONAL STANDARD)

COMMENTARY USP 32-NF 27

Lobbying Policy To execute advocacy in a manner accountable to CAPIC lobbying members

The Initiative for Responsible Mining Assurance (IRMA)

Standards Committee Subcommittee Organization and Procedures March 10, 2008

Children s Findings Assent and Permission. Bertha delanda IRB Training Specialist Research Compliance Office April 2012

Global Sustainability Standards Board Due Process Protocol October 2018

Regulatory Accountability Act of Key Differences Between the Senate RAA and H.R. 5

Introduction. Standard Processes Manual VERSION 3.0: Effective: June 26,

2015 UPC & UMC TECHNICAL COMMITTEE MEETING WELCOME TECHNICAL COMMITTEE IAPMO CODES AND STANDARDS DEVELOPMENT PROCESS

PRINCIPLES GOVERNING IPCC WORK

IBAC Technical Report Summary. Subject: ICAO Aviation Security. Meeting: ICAO AVSECP/20 Meeting March 30 April 3, IBAC File: Security

Committee Officer Elections

Advance unedited version

AMERICAN IRON AND STEEL INSTITUTE PROCEDURES FOR ANSI-APPROVED STANDARDS FOR COLD-FORMED STEEL DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION

Technical Committee Operations Manual

Draft Guidance for Industry: ANDA Submissions Amendments and Easily Correctable Deficiencies Under GDUFA

Regulatory Update: Food Safety and Nutrition

Draft IPSASB Due Process and Working Procedures. 1. To discuss and agree the draft IPSASB Due Process and Working Procedures.

FSC PROCEDURE. THE DEVELOPMENT AND APPROVAL OF FSC SOCIAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL INTERNATIONAL STANDARDS FSC-PRO (Version 2-0) EN

THE OPTIONS CLEARING CORPORATION RISK COMMITTEE CHARTER 1

Joint Convention on the Safety of Spent Fuel Management and on the Safety of Radioactive Waste Management

Mary L. Larsgaard, chair ALA/ALCTS/CCS Committee on Cataloging: Description and Access. Kathy Winzer, American Association of Law Librarians liaison

DISCUSSION PAPER INDIGENOUS ENGAGEMENT AND CONSULTATION

Transmitted by the expert from the United States on behalf of the informal correspondence group on the global list *

SECTION 1 BACKGROUND. Chapter 1 Introduction

At the end of this module, you will be able to: Understand the responsibilities of Standards & Certification Project Management Understand the roles

ASC Subcommittees and Other Subordinate Groups

Document Approval Process. Wireless Innovation Forum Policy 001 Version 3.1.0

CODES AND STANDARDS COMMITTEE OPERATING PROCEDURES

Framework Convention on Climate Change

Operating Procedures for ATIS Forums and Committees

Standards Development Manual

COMMITTEE CHARTER. SAE AISC-SHM Aerospace Industry Steering Committee on Structural Health Monitoring Version 2.2 February 2017 ARTICLE I CHARTER

Japan-EU EPA (SPS) (Non-Paper) Article 1: Objectives

TABLE OF CONTENTS. Executive Summary Introduction Background/Discussion Recommendations Conclusion... 11

Standards Committee Charter

Program Management Reports Guide

TERMS OF REFERENCE. Contracting Authority. 1.0 Beneficiaries. 1.1 Relevant Background SADC EPA

TITLE III--IMPROVING THE SAFETY OF IMPORTED FOOD

Consultation Paper. Draft Regulatory Technical Standards on Resolution Colleges under Article 88(7) of Directive 2014/59/EU EBA/CP/2014/46

CARDINAL HEALTH, INC. DISCLOSURE COMMITTEE CHARTER Amended and Restated May 8, 2013

Executive Committee: Provides the overall direction of the FDP and reports to the Membership at Large.

THE OPTIONS CLEARING CORPORATION COMPENSATION AND PERFORMANCE COMMITTEE CHARTER

FINAL PROJECT REPORT

HEALTH LAW COMMITTEE CHARTER

(Billing Code P) Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement: Clauses with. Alternates Research and Development Contracting (DFARS Case

Residues of veterinary drugs in food. WHO procedural guidelines for the Joint FAO/WHO Expert Committee on Food Additives. Geneva, January 2001

FRCC REGIONAL RELIABILITY STANDARD DEVELOPMENT PROCESS MANUAL

The Programme of Action of the 1994 International Conference on Population and Development: What lessons for the global migration compact?

ASCE Rules for Standards Committees

FDP Strategic Planning Committee. Report to the FDP Membership: Strategic Plan for Phase VI. The FDP Vision Our Picture of the Ideal Future

Review of Existing General Regulatory and Information Collection Requirements of the

IFLA s ISBD Progamme: Purpose, Process, and Prospects

NINTH MEETING OF THE INTERGOVERNMENTAL OEA/Ser.L WORKING GROUP ON THE MULTILATERAL EVALUATION MECHANISM (IWG-MEM) May 2, 2006

I. INTRODUCTION 2 II. WHAT IS LEED? 4 III. HOW IS LEED DEVELOPED? 7

AIAA STANDARDS PROGRAM PROCEDURES

SOP TITLE: Procedures Governing Standards Development SOP NO.: 2-100

Bylaws of Petroleum Industry Data Exchange, Inc.

Terms of Reference. Microdata Curation Consultant. Statistics Unit, Field Information and Coordination Support Section (FICSS), UNHCR Copenhagen

REVIEW OF THE COMMON CASH FACILITY APPROACH IN JORDAN HEIDI GILERT AND LOIS AUSTIN. The Cash Learning Partnership

COMMITTEE/WORKING GROUP CHARTER SOCIAL SERVICES TRANSPORTATION ADVISORY COUNCIL (SSTAC)

First Nations Perspectives: Review of National Aquatic Animal Health Program

National Research Council Canada (NRC)

X12 Corporate Administrative Policy and Procedure. X12 Membership (CAP04)

ReliabilityFirst Corporation Reliability Standards Development Procedure Version 4

5 Multiple Protection of Inventions

Standardization. Policies and Procedures. of the. National Electrical. Manufacturers. Association

The Development and Revision of FSC Normative Documents FSC-PRO V3-1 EN

WOMEN S FACULTY COMMITTEE BYLAWS

FDP Administrative Policies

Food additives and food contaminants

Re: File No. SR-NASD Amendments to NASD Code of Arbitration Procedure Rules and 10205(h) Relating to Injunctive Relief

Policy Development Tool Kit

April 20, Dear Mr. Perciasepe:

The Food Industry's Current and Future Regulatory Environment. Jessica P. O Connell May 23, 2017

Resettlement Assessment Tool: Polygamous Families

Fisheries and Aquaculture Standards Revision Process Procedures Contents

AEC 2025 TRADE FACILITATION STRATEGIC ACTION PLAN

ASME Codes and Standards. Development Committee Procedures. With Supplemental Requirements For Committees. Under the Jurisdiction of the

Inventory Project: Identifying and Preserving Minnesota s Digital Legislative Record

Evaluation of the Overseas Orientation Initiatives

IACUC POLICIES, PROCEDURES, and GUIDELINES

DHS Biometrics Strategic Framework

CONVENTION ON INTERNATIONAL TRADE IN ENDANGERED SPECIES OF WILD FAUNA AND FLORA

DRAFT GUIDELINES FOR MINISTRIES ON CONSULTATION WITH ABORIGINAL PEOPLES RELATED TO ABORIGINAL RIGHTS AND TREATY RIGHTS

Central Iowa Collaborative Collections Initiative (CI-CCI) Memorandum of Understanding (MOU)

June Regulations Governing Consensus Development of the Water Efficiency and Sanitation Standard

Stakeholder Governance Guide

Consultation on TLAB Rules of Practice and Procedures and Related Documents

PROFESSIONAL STANDARDS POLICY. Table of Contents Page

2. PURPOSE, DEFINITION INTERPRETATION AND AMENDMENT OF THE CONSTITUTION 2.1 Purpose of the Constitution

A. Results of the implementation Review Mechanism of the United Nations Convention against Corruption

IOGP. Supplementary Procedure for Development and Maintenance of ISO Standards as an ISO Liaison Member. Rev

THE OPTIONS CLEARING CORPORATION GOVERNANCE AND NOMINATING COMMITTEE CHARTER

IEEE Publication Services and Products Board Operations Manual

Transcription:

USP 2010 2015 Council of Experts Expert Committee Orientation General Chapters Overview Anthony J. DeStefano, Ph.D. Vice President, General Chapters

General Chapters Overview General Chapters can be Required (numbered below <1000>) Informational (numbered <1xxx>) Specific for dietary supplements (numbered <2XXX>)

Required Chapters (Below <1000>) When referenced in monographs, are procedures used by the FDA to demonstrate compliance to a specification Typically are procedures referenced in multiple monographs Chapter status avoids duplication and simplifies updating Typically consist of method and procedure Acceptance criteria in the General Chapter or the monograph Can apply to monographs even if not specifically called out in the monograph Tests need to be verified by users for their applications

Informational Chapters (<1xxx>) Provide information or guidance Are not intended to be required by regulatory agencies Some countries enforce the entire USP NF FDA reserves the right to require at their discretion Should be devoid of acceptance criteria to minimize misunderstandings May become required if referenced without disclaimer in a monograph or General Chapter numbered below <1000> (very rare)

General Chapters and Reference Materials Reference materials are in a minority of General Chapters. Typically used to confirm identity or instrument performance verification When they occur, they are often high impact <711> Dissolution (Prednisone tablets) <467> Residual Solvents <90> Bovine Serum Quality Attributes <130> Protein A Quality Attributes May be proposed by staff, committee, panel, or an external source Evaluated via testing protocols similarly to reference materials in monographs Developed in parallel with documentary standard

Impact of General Chapters General Chapters have broad industry impact Some are required testing in monographs Some provide guidelines that are enforced outside the U.S. or are broadly applied in the U.S. even if not required Broad-based input is typically needed and provided For chapters with high impact, training may be needed Pharmacopeial education courses FAQs Guidebooks Much of this material is developed through the appropriate Expert Committees

General Notices, General Chapters, and Monographs General Notices contain requirements applicable throughout USP NF unless superseded by a chapter or monograph General Chapters contain requirements applicable to monographs to which they apply General Chapter requirements supersede General Notice requirements in case of conflict Monograph requirements are specific to the monograph in which they appear Monograph requirements supersede General Notice and General Chapter requirements in case of conflict

General Chapter Development New Chapters or Major Revisions Proposal for new General Chapter or major revision comes from staff, committee member, or external source Committee, sub-committee, or panel evaluates idea and develops a Pharmacopeia Forum (PF) proposal Public comment solicited Stimuli Article (common for new General Chapter) or draft chapter published in PF Design phase of workshop or other public meeting scheduled for high-impact chapters (required chapters with broad industry impact) Comments collected from public forums and shared with committee/panel

General Chapter Development New Chapters or Major Revisions Committee/panel develops updated proposal Another Stimuli Article in PF Draft General Chapter in PF Final General Chapter in USP NF with commentary addressing comments Timing From inception to first PF publication often 12 18 months Timing for final implementation of informational chapters typically shorter than for required chapters For a high-impact chapter, timing from inception to final chapter can be five years or more (e.g., elemental impurities)

General Chapters Current Status Chapters have been Written and updated over many years Under the auspices of many Expert Committees Updated without vision for style and content Styles, formats, and information content depend on Committee and USP norms at the time Maturity of technology at time of updating

Vision for General Chapters Required chapters Current technology Easy to read, understand, execute Clear acceptance criteria latitude for procedural changes Informative chapters Current guidance, no acceptance criteria Context for enforceable chapters Forward looking Relevant to real-world pharmaceutical issues All look and read as if edited by one person Summarized in PF 35(5) Sept/Oct 2009 Stimuli Article

Why is This Important? Should represent standard industry practice Current technology and acceptance criteria Meaningfully assess quality attributes Used across the globe Clear Concise Well-defined acceptance criteria Some countries enforce the whole book Some informational chapters contain enforceable sections Confusion, missed expectations, approval delays Harmonization Clear, concise wording is critical

Objective for the 2010-2015 Cycle Review the approximately 240 current chapters for content and format Prioritize the updating of those that need it using the appropriate committee, subcommittee or panel Develop and write new chapters as determined by each committee Collect broad-based stakeholder input for high-impact chapters

Official General Chapters in 2010-2015 CoE Cycle 31% In Revision (74 chapters) In Review (64 chapters) 27% Completed (53 chapters) To be Reviewed (48 chapters) 20% 22%

New & Official General Chapters, 2010-2015 CoE Cycle 18% 14% In Review (64 chapters) To be Reviewed (48 chapters) 21% In Revision (74 chapters) New in Development (108 chapters) 31% Completed (53 chapters) 15%