Follow this and additional works at:

Similar documents
Follow this and additional works at: Part of the Administrative Law Commons

Follow this and additional works at:

Follow this and additional works at: Part of the Administrative Law Commons

Follow this and additional works at: Part of the Administrative Law Commons

Matthew McBee vs. Safety

Follow this and additional works at: Part of the Administrative Law Commons

Gary F. Bickford vs. Safety

Vanessa Quilantan vs. Safety

Follow this and additional works at: Part of the Administrative Law Commons

Follow this and additional works at: Part of the Administrative Law Commons

TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT OF SAFETY vs. One 1996 Honda Accord Vin Number 1HGCE1822TA , Date of Seizure: October 21, 2010, Claimant: Lesile Frazier

Follow this and additional works at:

Valorie D. Thacker vs. Department of Safety

TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT vs. $ in U.S. CURRENCY, SEIZED FROM: MOISES SILVA, SEIZURE DATE: DECEMBER 9, 2009 CLAIMANT: MOISES SILVA

Follow this and additional works at:

Follow this and additional works at:

Follow this and additional works at:

Follow this and additional works at: Part of the Administrative Law Commons

Follow this and additional works at: Part of the Administrative Law Commons

DEPARTMENT OF SAFETY vs. $6, in US Currency, Seized from: Todd Walters, Date of Seizure: August 21, 2008, Claimant: Todd Walters

Follow this and additional works at:

Follow this and additional works at:

Follow this and additional works at:

Follow this and additional works at: Part of the Administrative Law Commons

Follow this and additional works at: Part of the Administrative Law Commons

Gregory Brunson vs. Safety

Follow this and additional works at:

Follow this and additional works at:

Trey & Michael Torres vs. Safety

Follow this and additional works at:

Follow this and additional works at: Part of the Administrative Law Commons

TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT OF SAFETY vs. KEVIN BEATY

Follow this and additional works at:

Follow this and additional works at:

Follow this and additional works at:

Follow this and additional works at:

William K. Bryant vs. Safety

Follow this and additional works at:

Follow this and additional works at:

Follow this and additional works at: Part of the Administrative Law Commons

Robert M. Russell vs. Safety

Follow this and additional works at: Part of the Administrative Law Commons

Follow this and additional works at:

Follow this and additional works at:

One 1994 Chevrole Pickup, VIN.: 1GCCS14W4R , SEIZED FROM: Trevor A. Coleman, DATE OF SEIZURE: March 12, 2012, CLAIMANT: Trevor A.

Follow this and additional works at:

TENNESSEE INSURANCE DIVISION, Petitioner, vs. Docket No.: J JAMES MICHAEL FOLEY, Respondent

Follow this and additional works at: Part of the Administrative Law Commons

Follow this and additional works at: Part of the Administrative Law Commons

Follow this and additional works at: Part of the Administrative Law Commons

AT JACKSON Assigned on Briefs July 9, 2013

Azam Mani Khwaga dba Hickory Hollow Wine and Liquor vs. Alcoholic Beverage Commission

Ben Miller dba Miller Enterprises vs. COMMERCE AND INSURANCE

TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN S SERVICES, Petitioner, vs. DARREN BIVINGS, Grievant.

BOARD OF EDUCATION vs. NATASHA KRUITHOF, Respondent.

DEPARTMENT OF FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS, COMPLIANCE DIVISION, Petitioner, vs. FIDELITY HOME MORTGAGE CORPORATION, Respondent

Follow this and additional works at: Part of the Administrative Law Commons

Follow this and additional works at: Part of the Administrative Law Commons

TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT OF FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS, COMPLIANCE DIVISION, Petitioner, vs. FIRST CHOICE FUNDING, INC., Respondent

Follow this and additional works at: Part of the Administrative Law Commons

Follow this and additional works at: Part of the Administrative Law Commons

Follow this and additional works at:

Tennessee Department of Financial Institutions, Compliance Division, Petitioner, vs. Charlton Hildreth, Respondent

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE February 22, 2017 Session

TENNESSEE BOARD OF PROBATION & PAROLE, Petitioner, vs. NIKEISHA ROYSTON, Grievant

Anderson Hutsell vs. Dept. of Health

TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT OF SAFETY, Department/, Petitioner, vs. CSGP 06-52VINCENT TUROCY, Grievant/, Respondent

Gloria Sanchez vs. DHS

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE January 14, 2003 Session

Smithee, Shelia v. Goodwill Industries

Commerce and Insurance vs. KEITH ODENE DODD, Respondent

Cornelius Sorina vs. Safety

TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT OF SAFETY, Petitioner, vs. KYLE CANTWELL, Grievant

Terry W. Rankin vs. COMMERCE AND INSURANCE

Follow this and additional works at: Part of the Administrative Law Commons

Follow this and additional works at:

Scales, Elijah v. Michael Sherlock

Mark Singer vs. Commerce and Insurance

Higgins, Patricia v. Five Points Healthcare, LLC, d.b.a. Willowbrook Home Health

Scales, Elijah v. Michael Sherlock

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE February 17, 2005 Session

METRO NASHVILLE GOVERNMENT (Metro Nashville Police Department), Petitioner/ Department vs. JONATHAN SMITH, Respondent/Grievant

Commerce and Insurance vs. MEMPHIS SECURITY, INC., Respondent

Tennessee Insurance Division, Petitioner, vs. John Porter Franklin, Jr., Respondent

COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE MIDDLE SECTION AT NASHVILLE APPEAL FROM THE CHANCERY COURT FOR DAVIDSON COUNTY AT NASHVILLE, TENNESSEE

Gray, Diana v. Daffy Duck Learning Akademy

2007 Indiana House Bill No. 1103, Indiana One Hundred Fifteenth General Assembly - First Regular Session

v No Oakland Circuit Court

Sanders, Sarah v. Regis Corp. dba SmartStyle

Owens, Sheila vs. Sitters, Etc.

BEFORE THE ARKANSAS WORKERS' COMPENSATION COMMISSION WCC NO. E911072/F TAMMY MCCULLOUGH, Employee. FAMILY DOLLARS, Employer

STATE OF OHIO ) IN THE COURT OF APPEALS NINTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COUNTY OF MEDINA ) DECISION AND JOURNAL ENTRY

TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION, Department/, Petitioner, vs. CSGP-07-14DOYLE WITCHER, Grievant/, Respondent

ALABAMA COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

Miller, John v. Lowe's Home Centers, Inc.

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE Assigned on Briefs on April 26, 2011

CHANDLER POLICE DEPARTMENT GENERAL ORDERS Serving with Courage, Pride, and Dedication

Jackson, Michael v. Transwood

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE Assigned on Briefs March 28, 2012

Lee, Thomas v. Federal Express Corporation

Transcription:

University of Tennessee, Knoxville Trace: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange Tennessee Department of State, Opinions from the Administrative Procedures Division Law 6-5-2008 TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT OF SAFETY vs. Eight Thousand, Seven Hundred Dollars, $8,700.00 in U.S. Currency, Seized from: Jerry L. Sexton, Date of Seizure: December 21, 2007, Claimant: Jerry L. Sexton Follow this and additional works at: http://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_lawopinions This Initial Order by the Administrative Judges of the Administrative Procedures Division, Tennessee Department of State, is a public document made available by the College of Law Library, and the Tennessee Department of State, Administrative Procedures Division. For more information about this public document, please contact administrative.procedures@tn.gov

BEFORE THE COMMISSIONER OF THE TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT OF SAFETY IN THE MATTER OF: ) ) TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT ) OF SAFETY ) ) v. ) DOCKET NO. 19.01-099233J ) [D.O.S. Case No. G 9780N] Eight Thousand, Seven Hundred Dollars ) ($8,700.00) in U.S. Currency ) Seized from: Jerry L. Sexton ) Date of Seizure: December 21, 2007 ) Claimant: Jerry L. Sexton ) INITIAL ORDER This matter was heard on June 5, 2008, in Knoxville, Tennessee, before Mattielyn B. Williams, Administrative Judge, assigned by the Secretary of State, Administrative Procedures Division, and sitting for the Commissioner of the Tennessee Department of Safety. Ms. Nina Harris, Staff Attorney, Tennessee Department of Safety, represented the State. Claimant Jerry L. Sexton was present and represented by Attorney P. Richard Talley, of the Dandridge bar. The State filed information on Canine Officer J.J. s Hit Rate, etc., on July 8, 2008. Claimant filed his Response on July 22, 2008. The State had the opportunity to file a Reply, within three (3) weeks of July 22, 2008. As of September 11, 2008, no further pleadings have been filed. This matter is considered ready for consideration. The subject of the hearing was the proposed forfeiture of the subject Eight Thousand Seven Hundred Dollars ($8,700.00) in U.S. Currency, seized for its alleged 1

use in facilitating or as involved in an exchange, in violation of the Tennessee Drug Control Act, thus making the property subject to seizure, pursuant to T.C.A. 53-11-451. After consideration of the record, it is DETERMINED that the subject U.S. Currency should be RETURNED to the Claimant. This decision is based upon the following Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law: FINDINGS OF FACT 1. Officer Kris Lewallen, of the Scott County Sheriff s Department, responded to a motor vehicle accident on December 21, 2007. Claimant Jerry Sexton, the driver, was not steady on his feet and seemed to be attempting to gather U.S. Currency and medications, when Officer Lewallen arrived. Claimant had flipped the vehicle that he was driving. Claimant s speech was slurred. Claimant was bleeding from the nose. An ambulance was called to the scene. 2. Officer Lewallen s certified Canine Officer, J.J., alerted to the vehicle that Claimant had been driving. Officer Lewallen testified that J.J. has been his partner for three (3) years and that J.J. alerts to marijuana, mushrooms, and cocaine. Two Hundred Twenty-Five (225) Methadone, Alprazelam, Oxycontin, and Oxycodone pills were found. Claimant had valid prescriptions for all of the pills. Eight Thousand Seven Hundred Dollars ($8,700.00) in U.S. Currency was seized one hundred thirty (130) $20s and sixty-one (61) $100s. 2

3. Claimant was charged with 1 st offense, Driving Under the Influence. Claimant did not dispute Officer Lewallen s assertion that his (Claimant s) blood contained more than a therapeutic dose of his (Claimant s) prescribed pills. 4. Officer Lewallen noted that, at the scene, Claimant stated that a dog ran in front of his vehicle, causing the accident, whereas, at the Sheriff s Department, after release from the hospital, Claimant stated that a deer ran in front of his vehicle. Officer Lewallen continued that at the scene, Claimant said his hip had been replaced, whereas at the hearing, he claims he has a plate in his hip. 5. Claimant Jerry Sexton testified that he has a plate in his hip, as a result of a head-on accident in 1999; hence the need for the pills found in his possession, on the scene. Bearden Pain Clinic prescribed the pills. 6. Claimant continued that he does not trust banks, works for cash from time to time, and does not want to place his money in a bank since he owes the hospital from his earlier care. Claimant testified that the funds seized include his savings. 7. Claimant completed the 8 th grade. 8. No direct evidence of an illegal drug transaction, involving the Claimant, was presented at the hearing. CONCLUSIONS OF LAW 1. The State must carry its burden of proof, by a preponderance of the evidence, that the subject U.S. Currency was used or exchanged in a manner that violated 3

the Tennessee Drug Control Act. Such violation subjects property to forfeiture pursuant to the provisions of T.C.A. 53-11-451. 2. The State contended that Claimant s testimony is not credible, based on hip replacement v. hip plate, dog v. deer, and 4 v. 10 years of savings. Given Claimant s level of education, it seems reasonable that Claimant may not be entirely clear as to whether or not the hip surgery he received constitutes a full or partial hip replacement v. insertion of a metal plate, with no hip replacement. Given the flipping of his car and need for an emergency room trip, whether it was a dog or a deer, Claimant is clear that an animal crossed the road and caused him to flip his car. 3. It is true that the subject U.S. Currency was in small bills, which is sometimes indicative of involvement in illegal drug transactions. On the other hand, many persons do not deposit cash into bank accounts, particularly when there are unsatisfied financial judgments against them. 4. It is true that J.J. did alert on the Claimant s vehicle, yet, not proof of even one ounce of illegal, non-prescribed drugs was found. 5. One wonders whether or not J.J. can distinguish prescribed Oxycontin from illegally-obtained Oxycontin and to what extent prescription-strength Oxycontin contains cocaine and/or other Scheduled Drugs, if any. 6. The statute requires proof of involvement in one or more drug transactions; however, the State did not present proof (marked money; tape from wire; CI information, etc.) of even a single drug transaction, involving Claimant and/or the subject U.S. Currency. 4

7. Therefore, based on the proof presented, it is CONCLUDED that the State FAILED to carry its burden of proof, by a preponderance of the evidence, that the seized U.S. Currency was obtained through, in exchange for, or used to facilitate an illegal drug transaction, in violation of the Tennessee Drug Control Act. 8. Therefore, it is hereby ORDERED that the seized Eight Thousand Seven Hundred Dollars ($8,700.00) in U.S. Currency be RETURNED to Claimant Jerry L. Sexton. This Initial Order entered and effective this 12th day of September, 2008. Mattielyn B. Williams Administrative Judge Filed in the Administrative Procedures Division, Office of the Secretary of State this 12th day of September, 2008. Thomas G. Stovall, Director Administrative Procedures Division 5