Exhibit 6: State of Oklahoma, Choctaw Nation of Oklahoma, Chickasaw Nation, City of Oklahoma City Water Settlement

Similar documents
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA

vs. ) Case No. CIV Pursuant to [insert Settlement Act citation] (hereinafter the Settlement Act ),

This Agreement, originally entered on the 15 th day of June, 2010, as amended this. day of,, is entered into by and among the City of Oklahoma

Native American Senate Documents 60th Congress (1908) 94th Congress (1975)

SAN JUAN RIVER BASIN IN NEW MEXICO NAVAJO NATION WATER RIGHTS SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT

vs. ) Case No. CIV JOINT MOTION BY PLAINTIFFS AND ALL DEFENDANTS FOR DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE PURSUANT TO FED. R. CIV. P.

University of Oklahoma Libraries Western History Collections. Chickasaw Nation Collection

III. SUMMARY OF TULE RIVER TRIBE'S HISTORIC AND FUTURE MONEY DAMAGES CLAIMS AGAINST THE UNITED STATES

Supreme Court of the United States

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA

History of the Arkansas. Riverbed

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

One Hundred Fourteenth Congress of the United States of America

In The Supreme Court of the United States

UTE INDIAN WATER COMPACT. Purpose of Compact. Legal Basis for Compact. Water

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA

Tribal Human Resources Professionals FIRST LINE REPRESENTATIVES AND ADVOCATES OF TRIBAL SOVEREIGNTY

In the Court of Claims of the United Stales

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA

PLEASE DISTRIBUTE TO THE CHICKASAW PEOPLE. A few plain reasons why the Choctaws and Chickasaws. should vote to ratify the Agreement

CHIPPEWA CREE TRIBE OF THE ROCKY BOY S RESERVATION INDIAN RESERVED WATER RIGHTS SETTLEMENT AND WATER SUPPLY ENHANCEMENT ACT OF 1999

Wyoming s Big Horn River Adjudication

CHOATE V. TRAPP 224 U.S. 665 (1912)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA

FACT SHEET Assistant Secretary of the Army for Civil Works Announces Tribal Initiatives

Working Effectively with Indian Tribes: Communication, Collaboration, Coordination, and Consultation, 2017

In The Supreme Court of the United States

United States Court of Appeals

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN. v. Case No. 14-CV-876 DECISION AND ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO DISMISS

TIGER V. WESTERN INV. CO. 221 U.S. 286 (1911)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN. Plaintiff, Case No.: 14-C-876 MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT OF DEFENDANT S MOTION TO DISMISS

IN THE UNITED STATE DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA SOUTHERN DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFF S MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION

The Age of Jackson A New Kind of Politics

UNITED STATES et al. v. McINTIRE et al. FLATHEAD IRR. DIST. v. SAME.

Pamela Williams, Director Secretary s Indian Water Rights Office. WSWC Spring Meeting March 21, 2019 Chandler, AZ

IN RE LANDS OF FIVE CIVILIZED TRIBES. 199 F. 811 (E.D. Okla. 1912)

American Legal History Russell

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

University of Oklahoma Libraries Western History Collections. George Nelson Collection

Henry Clay met with Adams, and said he would use his influence as Speaker of the House to elect Adams if Adams named him Sec. of State Adams was

Case 5:15-cv L Document 1 Filed 03/09/15 Page 1 of 16 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA

DEPARTMENTAL REGULATION

6:14-cv KEW Document 26 Filed in ED/OK on 06/17/14 Page 1 of 10 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA

Case 5:14-cv D Document 2 Filed 03/20/14 Page 1 of 9 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA

The Aamodt case is a complex, long-running adjudication of water

SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT CONCERNING THE RELICENSING OF THE PELTON ROUND BUTTE HYDROELECTRIC PROJECT FERC PROJECT NO AMONG

S. ll IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES A BILL

Escondido Mutual Water Co. v. La Jolla Band of Mission Indians, 466 U.S. 765 (1984)

by television broadcasters to the digital television service; or (2) to require the Commission to take any such action.

Notice No Closing Date: June 30, 2016

GRISSO V. U.S. 138 F.2d 996 (10th Cir. 1943)

WHEREAS, the Projects lie within the States of South Carolina and Georgia; and,

What to Expect from This Session

Kickapoo Titles in Oklahoma

DESCRIPTIVE SUMMARY: The United States responses to interrogatories of the Cities of Aztec and Bloomfield

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES. SEPTEMBER 29, 1996 Referred to the Committtee on Resources AN ACT

1IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA

Case 2:13-cv DB Document 2 Filed 12/03/13 Page 1 of 10

Case No. CIV HE Judge Joe Heaton, United States District Judge, Presiding

The Implications of Permitting and Development on Indian Reservations

No IN THE Supreme Court of the United States. FOURTEEN YEARS, BIRTH FATHER, AND THE CHEROKEE NATION, Respondents.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

No IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT. CROW ALLOTTEES ASSOCIATION, et al.,

Utilities. (Amended as of 1/16/13) CHICKASAW NATION CODE TITLE 20 "20. UTILITIES" CHAPTER 1 TRIBAL UTILITY SERVICES

Section 1: Recitals. Section 2: Purpose and Scope.

Model Public Water, Public Justice Act

US Code (Unofficial compilation from the Legal Information Institute) TITLE 25 - INDIANS CHAPTER 5 PROTECTION OF INDIANS

Treaty of the Tribal Internet Gaming Alliance

Vague and Ambiguous. The terms market and marketing are not defined.as such, the

The End of Indian Territory

Case 5:15-cv RDR-KGS Document 1 Filed 03/09/15 Page 1 of 14 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS

The Indian Reorganization (W'heeler-Howard Act) June 18, 1934

University of Oklahoma Libraries Western History Collections. Choctaw Nation Papers

Case 5:12-cv C Document 15 Filed 01/07/13 Page 1 of 10 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA

NO ANSWERING BRIEF FOR THE DEFENDANTS-APPELLEES

'" MAY BETWEEN OTTAWA county e OKLAHOMA, AND THE BUREAU OF INDIAN AFFAIRS, DEPARTMENT OF INTERIOR

Chapter 12. Boomer Sooner

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SOUTHERN DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

U.S. Supreme Court. Montana v. United States, 450 U.S. 544 (1981) Montana v. United States. No Argued December 3, 1980

CAL/EPA POLICY MEMORANDUM NUMBER:

Due Diligence in Business Transactions with Tribal Governments and Enterprises

Case 1:14-cv RMC Document 98 Filed 05/25/18 Page 1 of 19 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Montana Land and Water Alliance, Inc P.O. Box 1061 Polson, Montana

Case 5:08-cv D Document 71 Filed 03/24/2009 Page 1 of 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA

SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

CIVIL JURISDICTION IN INDIAN COUNTRY

November 17, 1997 RECITALS

Opportunities for Tribal State Collaboration Alaska Tribal Court Conference Fairbanks 2016

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA

FQLSOK/ LES IlflOTIE.V #18684 / "~ 78

Case 5:08-cv LEK-GJD Document 47 Filed 06/05/2009 Page 1 of 12 UNITED STATES REPLY IN SUPPORT OF MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFFS SUPPLEMENTAL CLAIM

Transcription:

1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 Exhibit : State of Oklahoma, Choctaw Nation of Oklahoma, Chickasaw Nation, City of Oklahoma City Water Settlement WAIVERS AND RELEASES OF CLAIMS BY THE CHOCTAW NATION OF OKLAHOMA AND THE UNITED STATES Subject to the retention of rights set forth in the Settlement Agreement, Section. except in their capacity as Allottees, and the Settlement Act and except to the extent that rights are recognized in the Settlement Agreement or Settlement Act, including recognition of the Choctaw Nation of Oklahoma s water rights, the Choctaw Nation of Oklahoma, in its own right and on behalf of its members (except in their capacity as Allottees), and the United States acting in its capacity as trustee for the Choctaw Nation of Oklahoma and its members (except in their capacity as Allottees), waive and release: (1) all of the following claims the Choctaw Nation of Oklahoma asserted or could have asserted in any proceeding filed or which could have been filed up to or upon the Enforceability Date, including Chickasaw Nation, Choctaw Nation v. Fallin et al., CIV - (W.D. Ok.), OWRB v. United States, et al. CIV 1- (W.D. Ok.), or any general stream adjudication: (a) claims to the ownership of water in the State of Oklahoma; (b) claims to water rights and rights to use water diverted or taken from a location within the State of Oklahoma; (c) claims to authority over the allocation and management of water and administration of water rights, including authority over third-party ownership of or rights to use water diverted or taken from a location within the State of Oklahoma and ownership or use of water on Allotments by Allottees or anyone else using water on an Allotment with the Allottee s permission; (d) claims that the State lacks authority over the allocation and management of water and administration of water rights, including authority over the ownership of or rights to use water diverted or taken from a location within the State of Oklahoma; (e) any other claim relating to the ownership of water, regulation of water, or authorized diversion, storage, or use of water diverted or taken from a location within the State of Oklahoma, which claim is based on the Choctaw Nation of Oklahoma s particular status as a federally recognized American Indian tribe possessed of powers of sovereignty and self-government as defined by federal law and pursuant to those treaties to which it is a signatory; (f) claims or defenses asserted and which could have been asserted in Chickasaw Nation, Choctaw Nation v. Fallin et al., CIV - (W.D. Ok.), OWRB v. United States, et al. CIV 1- (W.D. Ok.), or any general stream adjudication; () all claims for damages, losses or injuries to water rights or water, or claims of interference damages, losses, injuries, interference with, diversion, storage, taking, or use of water) attributable to any action by the State of Oklahoma, the Oklahoma Water Resources Board, or any water user authorized pursuant to state law to take or use water in the State of Oklahoma, including but not limited to the City of Oklahoma City, that accrued at any time up to and including the Enforceability Date; Version: 01-0-0

1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 () all claims and objections relating to the City of Oklahoma City s Permit Application No. 00-01, as amended pursuant to the Settlement Agreement and the Settlement Act, and the City Permit, including but not limited to: (a) all claims regarding regulatory control over or Oklahoma Water Resources Board jurisdiction relating to such permit application and permit; and (b) all claims for damages, losses or injuries to water rights or rights to use water, or claims of interference with, diversion, storage, taking, or use of water (including claims for injury to land resulting from such damages, losses, injuries, interference with, diversion, storage, taking, or use of water) attributable to the issuance and lawful exercise of the City Permit; () all claims to regulatory control over the City of Oklahoma City s Permit Numbers P0- and -1 for water rights from the Muddy Boggy River for Atoka Reservoir and P-D for water rights from the Muddy Boggy River, including McGee Creek, for McGee Creek Reservoir; () all claims that the State lacks regulatory authority over or Oklahoma Water Resources Board jurisdiction relating to the City of Oklahoma City s Permit Numbers P0- and -1 for water rights from the Muddy Boggy River for Atoka Reservoir and P-D for water rights from the Muddy Boggy River, including McGee Creek, for McGee Creek Reservoir; () all claims to damages, losses or injuries to water rights or water, or claims of interference City of Oklahoma City s lawful exercise of Permit Numbers P0- and -1 for water rights from the Muddy Boggy River for Atoka Reservoir and P-D for water rights from the Muddy Boggy River, including McGee Creek, for McGee Creek Reservoir, that accrued at any time up to and including the Enforceability Date; () all claims and objections relating to approval by the United States Army Corps of Engineers of the assignment of the Storage Contract of 1 pursuant to the Amended Storage Contract Transfer Agreement; and () all claims for damages, losses or injuries to water rights or water, or claims of interference lawful exercise of rights pursuant to the Amended Storage Contract Transfer Agreement. FOR THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Sally Jewell, Secretary U.S. Department of the Interior Page of

FOR THE CHOCTAW NATION OF OKLAHOMA Gary Batton, Chief Choctaw Nation of Oklahoma Page of

1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 WAIVERS AND RELEASES OF CLAIMS BY THE CHOCTAW NATION OF OKLAHOMA AGAINST THE UNITED STATES Subject to the retention of rights set forth in the Settlement Agreement, Section., and the Settlement Act and except to the extent that rights are recognized in the Settlement Agreement or Settlement Act, including recognition of the Choctaw Nation of Oklahoma s water rights, the Choctaw Nation of Oklahoma, in its own right and on behalf of its members (except in their capacity as Allottees), and the United States acting in its capacity as trustee for the Choctaw Nation of Oklahoma and its members (except in their capacity as Allottees), waive and release: (1) all of the following claims the United States acting in its capacity as trustee for the Choctaw Nation of Oklahoma asserted or could have asserted in any proceeding filed or which could have been filed up to or upon the Enforceability Date, including Chickasaw Nation, Choctaw Nation v. Fallin et al., CIV - (W.D. Ok.), OWRB v. United States, et al. CIV 1- (W.D. Ok.), or any general stream adjudication: (a) claims to the ownership of water in the State of Oklahoma; (b) claims to water rights and rights to use water diverted or taken from a location within the State of Oklahoma; (c) claims to authority over the allocation and management of water and administration of water rights, including authority over third-party ownership of or rights to use water diverted or taken from a location within the State of Oklahoma and ownership or use of water on Allotments by Allottees or anyone else using water on an Allotment with the Allottee s permission; (d) claims that the State lacks authority over the allocation and management of water and administration of water rights, including authority over the ownership of or rights to use water diverted or taken from a location within the State of Oklahoma; (e) any other claim relating to the ownership, regulation, or authorized diversion, storage, or use of water diverted or taken from a location within the State of Oklahoma, which claim is based on the Choctaw Nation of Oklahoma s particular status as a federally recognized American Indian tribe possessed of powers of sovereignty and self-government as defined by federal law and pursuant to those treaties to which it is a signatory; (f) claims or defenses asserted and which could have been asserted in Chickasaw Nation, Choctaw Nation v. Fallin et al., CIV - (W.D. Ok.), OWRB v. United States, et al. CIV 1- (W.D. Ok.), or any general stream adjudication; () all claims for damages, losses or injuries to water rights or water, or claims of interference damages, losses, injuries, interference with, diversion, storage, taking, or use of water) attributable to any action by the State of Oklahoma, the Oklahoma Water Resources Board, or any water user authorized pursuant to state law to take or use water in the State of Oklahoma, including but not limited to the City of Oklahoma City, that accrued at any time up to and including the Enforceability Date; () all claims and objections relating to the City of Oklahoma City s Permit Application No. 00-01, as amended pursuant to the Settlement Agreement and the Settlement Act, and the City Permit, including but not limited to: Page of

1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 (a) all claims regarding regulatory control over or Oklahoma Water Resources Board jurisdiction relating to such permit application and permit; and (b) all claims for damages, losses or injuries to water rights or rights to use water, or claims of interference with, diversion, storage, taking, or use of water (including claims for injury to land resulting from such damages, losses, injuries, interference with, diversion, storage, taking, or use of water) attributable to the issuance and lawful exercise of the City Permit; () all claims to regulatory control over the City of Oklahoma City s Permit Numbers P0- and -1 for water rights from the Muddy Boggy River for Atoka Reservoir and P-D for water rights from the Muddy Boggy River, including McGee Creek, for McGee Creek Reservoir; () all claims that the State lacks regulatory authority over or Oklahoma Water Resources Board jurisdiction relating to the City of Oklahoma City s Permit Numbers P0- and -1 for water rights from the Muddy Boggy River for Atoka Reservoir and P-D for water rights from the Muddy Boggy River, including McGee Creek, for McGee Creek Reservoir; () all claims to damages, losses or injuries to water rights or water, or claims of interference City of Oklahoma City s lawful exercise of Permit Numbers P0- and -1 for water rights from the Muddy Boggy River for Atoka Reservoir and P-D for water rights from the Muddy Boggy River, including McGee Creek, for McGee Creek Reservoir, that accrued at any time up to and including the Enforceability Date; () all claims and objections relating to the approval by the United States Army Corps of Engineers of the assignment of the Storage Contract of 1 pursuant to the Amended Storage Contract Transfer Agreement; () all claims relating to the United States litigation, prior to the Enforceability Date, of the Nations water rights in the State of Oklahoma; and () all claims relating to the negotiation, execution, or adoption of the Settlement Agreement (including exhibits) or the Settlement Act. FOR THE CHOCTAW NATION OF OKLAHOMA Gary Batton, Chief Choctaw Nation of Oklahoma Page of