QUESTION / CLARIFICATION

Similar documents
RECOMMENDATION FOR USE

QUESTION / CLARIFICATION

(Non-legislative acts) DECISIONS

Recitals. Common Safety Method for assessing conformity with the requirements for obtaining railway single safety certificates.

Working document on questions of interpretation: How to deal with TSI errors?

HUMAN RIGHTS AND EQUAL OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION. DISABILITY DISCRIMINATION ACT 1992 (Cth), Sections 55(1) and 55(1A)

Arrangements to be applied by the Agency for public access to documents (Consolidated Version)

NSRs Management Potential scenarios. Workshop on NSRs rail TDG Valenciennes, 07 March 2014 Kyriakos DOULIS, Safety Unit

The Railways (Interoperability) Regulations 2011

RECOMMENDATION FOR USE RFU RST 082

DISABILITY DISCRIMINATION ACT 1992 (Cth), Sections 55(1) and 55(1A)

Railway Interoperability and Safety Committee. Working document

Implementation of Directive 2005/47 - Working conditions of mobile workers - cross border services in railway sector

DIRECTIVES. (Text with EEA relevance)

2008/163/EC, 2008/164/EC, 2008/217/EC, 2008/231/EC, 2008/232/EC, 2008/284/EC, 2011/229/EU, 2011/274/EU, 2011/275/EU, 2011/291/EU

Standards Manual. Issue Three

ADA Compliance: Is it Enough? Tiffany Lorenzen General Counsel. San Diego Metropolitan Transit System

English version of. Executive Order on Authorisation for Placing in Service of Subsystems in the Railway Infrastructure

March 23, Subject: Proposed Ordinance to Amend Chapter 16 (Building Code)

on the proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council concerning customs enforcement of intellectual property rights

LOCAL GOVERNMENT, PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTAL LAW UPDATE. June 2018

Procedure for cooperation by the Agency and its staff with Member States judicial authorities in the context of judicial proceedings

Tender Specifications. ERTMS specification formalisation support and modelling

201X No. TRANSPORT AND WORKS, ENGLAND. The Network Rail (Cambridgeshire Level Crossing Reduction) Order 201X

Official Journal of the European Union. (Legislative acts) REGULATIONS

ANNEX ANNEX. to the. Proposal for a Council Decision

Partial revision of Appendix G (ATMF) of the Convention (Text as modified and Explanatory Report)

(Code 2004, ; Ord. No , 1, )

Regarding compliance with Clause D1 in regards to the use of balustrade capping as a handrail in a house at 29 Chelmsford Avenue, Glendowie, Auckland

OTIF. 24 th Session. Partial revision of Appendix E (CUI) to the Convention (Text as modified and Explanatory Report)

Final report Draft Implementing Technical Standards on penalties and measures under Directive 2009/65/EC (UCITS Directive)

201X No. TRANSPORT AND WORKS, ENGLAND. The Network Rail (Suffolk Level Crossing Reduction) Order CONTENTS TRANSPORT ENGLAND PART 1 PRELIMINARY

Final report. 30 May 2017 ESMA

WORKPLACE SAFETY AND HEALTH ACT (CHAPTER 354A) WORKPLACE SAFETY AND HEALTH (WORK AT HEIGHTS) REGULATIONS 2013

ECN RECOMMENDATION ON COMMITMENT PROCEDURES

Guidelines. Type approval of constituents and signalling systems

Guideline on Applying for Exemption or Filing of a Notice of Exemption. December 14, 2011

Procedures Governing the Provision of Election Information and Services to Persons with Disabilities

General guidance on EFSA procurements

Economic and Social Council

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular Article 16 thereof,

ANNUAL ACTIVITY REPORT. July 2006 July European Coordinator. Pavel Telička. PRIORITY PROJECT No 27. «Rail Baltica»

(c) "property" includes any building, hut, structure, wall, tree, fence, post, pole or any other erection;

(OJ L 143, , p. 70)

SOUTH AFRICAN NATIONAL STANDARD

Rights of passengers travelling by bus and coach (Regulation (EU) N 181/2011)

Official Journal of the European Union

STATUTORY INSTRUMENTS. S.I. No. 333 of 2011 EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES (ELECTRONIC COMMUNICATIONS NETWORKS AND SERVICES) (FRAMEWORK) REGULATIONS 2011

State Environmental Planning Policy No 64 (Advertising and Signage) (Amendment No 2)

To the Federal Highway Administration, Federal Transit Administration, and Federal Railroad Administration:

Proposal for a COUNCIL DECISION

Verity Touch Writer. Hart InterCivic Inc.

Freedom of Information Act 2000 (Section 50) Environmental Information Regulations Decision Notice

REPORT ON AUDITING AND ASSESSING THE POLLING STATION ACCESSIBILITY FOR PEOPLE WITH DIFFERENT ABILITIES ON THE TERRITORY OF REPUBLIC OF MACEDONIA

Data Processing Agreement

Multilateral Memorandum of Understanding on. Cooperation Arrangements and Exchange of Information

Mission of Montenegro to the European Union

AN BILLE UM MÍCHUMAS, 2001 DISABILITY BILL, Mar a tionscnaíodh As initiated ARRANGEMENT OF SECTIONS

AUTOMATED AND ELECTRIC VEHICLES BILL DELEGATED POWERS MEMORANDUM BY THE DEPARTMENT FOR TRANSPORT

MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING CONCERNING CONSULTATION, COOPERATION AND THE EXCHANGE OF INFORMATION

PROPOSAL FOR A DIRECTIVE ON REPRESENTATIVE

2018 Municipal Election Accessibility Plan. Township of Drummond/North Elmsley

CONSERVATION AND RECLAMATION REGULATION

Attachment 1. Commission Decision C(2010)593 Standard Contractual Clauses (processors)

OJ Ann. I(I) L. 156(I) 2004 No 3851,

CROSSRAIL INFORMATION PAPER D2 CONTROL OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS

COUNCIL DIRECTIVE 2002/89/EC. of 28 November 2002

Having regard to the opinion of the European Economic and Social Committee ( 1 ),

This document is meant purely as a documentation tool and the institutions do not assume any liability for its contents

AGENDA WORKSHOP MEETING TOWN BOARD TOWN OF MARLBOROUGH 21 MILTON TURNPIKE, MILTON NEW YORK AUGUST 27, 2018

Article 1 Introduction and General Provisions

PETITION FOR ANNEXATION

Providing Facilities to Persons with Disabilities. Election Commission of India. Nirvachan Sadan, Ashoka Road, New Delhi

Mineral Resources Department, Government of Chhattisgarh REPLY TO PRE BID QUERIES FOR "AUCTION OF MINING LEASE FOR GUMA LIMESTONE BLOCK

COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING REGULATION (EU)

High Speed Rail (London - West Midlands) Bill

TERM AC Capacity of transport infrastructure networks

Guidelines and Recommendations

Not Validated translation of the Royal Decree on the transport of Class 7 dangerous goods.

Lineside Security. Withdrawn Document Uncontrolled When Printed. Railway Group Standard GC/RT5201 Issue Two Date December 1999

COMMISSION STAFF WORKING DOCUMENT. on implementation of the Special Kaliningrad Transit Programme ( )

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular Article 16 thereof,

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN

KARNATAKA ACT NO 09 OF 2013 THE KARNATAKA LIFTS, ESCALATORS AND PASSENGER CONVEYORS ACT, 2012 Arrangement of Sections

Offshore Wind Energy Act (WindSeeG 2017)

Guidance Document. on the Relationship Between. the General Product Safety Directive (GPSD)

Standard Operating Procedure for Disagreement in procedures Referral Art. 33(1) to CMDv

COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES. Proposal for a COUNCIL DECISION

Telecom Notice of Consultation CRTC

10126 Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 39 / Monday, February 29, 2016 / Rules and Regulations

IC Chapter 9. Parking Facilities for Persons With Physical Disabilities

Economic and Social Council

TO THE GOVERNMENTS OF THE MEMBER STATES OF OTIF AND TO REGIONAL ORGANISATIONS WHICH HAVE ACCEDED TO COTIF

(2002/309/EC, Euratom)

Third country auditor deregistration procedures

Summary of Items Discussed in 3/2015 APSEC Discussion Forum on 29 May 2015

CITY OF PORT ST LUCIE

Facility Crossing Part 2

ECC. Rules of Procedure for the Electronic Communications Committee. (and its subordinate entities) Edition 11. Split, June 2011 CEPT

Working Paper on the Clarification of Article 14 b of Directive 93/42/EEC (MDD) 19 March 2004

Transcription:

QUESTION / CLARIFICATION CO-ORDINATION BETWEEN NOTIFIED BODIES INTEROPERABILITY DIRECTIVE AND SUBSEQUENT AMENDMENTS ON THE INTEROPERABILITY OF THE RAIL SYSTEM WITHIN THE UNION QC-INF-013 Issue 02 Date 15/09/2016 Page 1 of 3 TITLE PRM INFRASTRUCTURE: STAIRCASES REQUIREMENTS OFFSIDE OBSTACLE- FREE ROUTE ARSENAL RACE ORIGINATOR SUBJECT RELATED TO TSI PRM 2008/164/EC TSI PRM 1300/2014 DESCRIPTION AND BACKGROUND EXPLANATION Notes to Issue 02 The Issue 02 takes the analysis and solution from the Technical Opinion of the European Railway Agency ERA/OPI/2014-4 of 10 July 2014 as approved at RISC 71 into account. Moreover, the references to the draft version of TSI PRM were replaced by the published TSI PRM 1300/2014. ************************************************************************************************* Question: Are requirements for stairs mandatory for the whole station area or along the obstacle free route only (especially: tactile bands prior to stairs)? Tactile bands provided offside the obstacle-free route would be tactile fields which are not connected to the tactile path. Concerning requirements for stairs, the TSI PRM 2008/164/EC refers to staircases on the main route (4.1.2.15); whereas the new TSI PRM 1300/2014 explicitly refers to staircases on the obstacle-free route. In both versions, the requirements concerning information for visually impaired (among them the tactile path) are only mandatory along the obstacle-free route. TSI PRM 2008/164/EC 2.1.1 Infrastructure [...] This includes the accessibility of the public areas of the Infrastructure (including stations) controlled by the Railway Undertaking, Infrastructure Manager or Station Manager. [...] 4.1.2.15. Stairs Staircases shall comply with European or National Rules. Staircases on the main route shall have a minimum obstacle-free width of 1 600 mm measured between the handrails. [...] Prior to the first ascending stair and also prior to the first descending stair there shall be a tactile band, over the whole width of the stair. This band shall have a minimum depth of 400 mm, shall contrast with and be integrated into the floor surface. This band shall differ to those used for the tactile guide path where installed. [...] QUESTION & CLARIFICATION

QUESTION / CLARIFICATION CO-ORDINATION BETWEEN NOTIFIED BODIES INTEROPERABILITY DIRECTIVE AND SUBSEQUENT AMENDMENTS ON THE INTEROPERABILITY OF THE RAIL SYSTEM WITHIN THE UNION QC-INF-013 Issue 02 Date 15/09/2016 Page 2 of 3 TSI PRM 1300/2014 2.1.1 Scope related to Infrastructure This TSI applies to all the public areas of stations dedicated to the transport of passengers that are controlled by the railway undertaking, infrastructure manager or station manager. [...] 2.3 Other Definitions Obstacle-free route An obstacle-free route is a link between two or more public areas dedicated to the transport of passengers such as specified in clause 2.1.1. It can be navigated by all persons with disabilities and reduced mobility. In order to achieve this, the route can be divided to better meet the needs of all persons with disabilities and reduced mobility. The combination of all the parts of the obstacle free route constitutes the route accessible for all persons with disabilities and reduced mobility. 4.2.1.2.2 Vertical circulation (1) Where an obstacle-free route includes a change in level, there shall be a step-free route providing an alternative to stairs for mobility impaired people. (2) Staircases on the obstacle-free routes shall have a minimum width of 160 cm measured between the handrails. As a minimum the first and last steps shall be indicated by a contrasting band and as a minimum tactile warning surface indicators shall be installed before the first descending step. (3) Ramps shall be installed for persons with disabilities and persons with reduced mobilities unable to use stairs where lifts are not provided. They shall have a moderate gradient. A steep gradient is allowed for ramps on short distances only. (4) Stairs and ramps shall be provided with handrails on both sides and at two levels. Both TSIs: TSI PRM 1300/2014: 4.2.1.2.3 Route identification Obstacle-free routes shall be clearly identified by visual information as detailed in clause 4.2.1.10. Information on the obstacle-free route shall be given to visually impaired people by tactile and contrasting walking surface indicators as a minimum. TSI PRM 2008/164/EC: 4.1.2.3.2 Route identification Obstacle-free routes shall be clearly identified by visual information as detailed in clause 4.2.1.11. Information on the obstacle-free route shall be given to visually impaired people by a minimum of one of the following means: e.g. tactile paths, audible, tactile signs, talking signs, Braille maps. QUESTION & CLARIFICATION

QUESTION / CLARIFICATION CO-ORDINATION BETWEEN NOTIFIED BODIES INTEROPERABILITY DIRECTIVE AND SUBSEQUENT AMENDMENTS ON THE INTEROPERABILITY OF THE RAIL SYSTEM WITHIN THE UNION QC-INF-013 Issue 02 Date 15/09/2016 Page 3 of 3 SUGGESTED RESOLUTION / INTERPRETATION The requirements of both PRM TSIs are nearly identical for staircases; however they are defined through a different approach. The TSI PRM 2008/164/EC defines the requirements for stairs regardless to the criteria of the obstacle-free route. Consequently, the requirements of stairs of chapter 4.2.1.15 are also applicable to staircases that are not on the obstacle-free route. The term main routes is used to describe all staircases between public areas. The TSI PRM 1300/2014 defines in chapter 2.3 that the obstacle-free route is any link between two or more public areas. In 4.2.1.2.2 (2) the requirements for staircases are linked to the obstacle-free routes. Therefore all staircases on any link between two or more public areas have to fulfil the requirements of 4.2.1.2.2 (2). According to both TSIs it is allowed (and this is also the purpose of the TSIs) to have staircases that are not linked to the guided path (tactile walking surface indicators) for visually impaired people. However, the requirements for width, tactile marking, contrast, anti-slip, handrails on both sides and at two levels always have to be applied. ERA ORGANISATION(S) REQUESTED TO RESPOND (E.G. TSI GROUP, RISC, ERA ETC.) PM44, 06/05/15 DATE OF AGREEMENT AT NB RAIL PLENARY MEETING RESPONSE FROM ORGANISATION ABOVE ERA issued the TO ERA/OPI/2014-4 on 10/07/14 Disclaimer: ERA TO always supersedes NB-Rail suggested solution in case of difference. QUESTION & CLARIFICATION

59307 European Railway Agency Executive Director OPINION ERA/OPI/2014-4 OF THE EUROPEAN RAILWAY AGENCY FOR EUROPEAN COMMISSION REGARDING QUESTION AND CLARIFICATION NB RAIL CONCERNING STAIRCASES REQUIREMENTS IN THE PRM TSI Q C-I NF- 013 Disclaimer: The present document is a non-legally binding opinion of the European Railway Agency. It does not represent the view of other EU institutions and bodies, and is without prejudice to the decision-making processes foreseen by the applicable EU legislation. Furthermore, a binding interpretation of EU law is the sole competence of the Court of Justice of the European Union. European Railway Agency 120 rue Marc Lefrancq BP 20392 - Valenciennes Cedex Tél : +33 (3)27096500 Fax: +33(3)27334065- www.era.europa.eu E-mail: marcel.verslype@era.europa.eu

OPINION ERA/OPI/2014-4 General Context 1. In its letter referenced as MOVE/B.2/NM/fz D (2014) and dated on 13 May 2014 addressed to the European Railway Agency ( ERA ), the European Commission requested ERA to prepare a technical opinion regarding the Question/Clarification request numbered QC-INF-13 put forward by [the Infrastructure subgroup of] NB-Rail. 2. This question is relating to the requirements for staircases in stations as they are specified in the Annex to Commission Decision 2008/164/EC of 21 December 2007 concerning the technical specification of interoperability relating to persons with reduced mobility in the trans-european conventional and high-speed rail system ( PRM TSI 2008 ). The Commission s request and the NB- Rail question can be found in Annex ito this opinion. 3. NB-Rail is asking in its question whether the requirements that apply to stairs are applicable in the whole station area or only along the obstacle-free routes within the station area. The justification for this question is that the wording of the PRM TSI 2008 seems to require that the requirements apply only to staircases on the main route (without defining what the main route is) while the proposed revised PRM TSI ( Revised PRM TSI ) seems to require that they apply only to staircases on the obstacle-free routes. 2 Legal Background 1. The PRM TSI 2008 indicates its scope, with regards to infrastructure, in the clause 2.1.1: The track, points, engineering structures (footbridges, tunnels, etc.), associated station Infrastructure (platforms, zones of access, including the needs of persons with reduced mobility, etc.), safety and protective equipment. This includes the accessibility of the public areas of the Infrastructure (including stations) controlled by the Railway Undertaking, Infrastructure Manager or Station Manager. This TSI is only applicable to the public areas of the stations and their zones of access controlled by the Railway Undertaking, Infrastructure Manager or Station Manager. 2. In its clause 4.1.2.3.1, the PRM TSI 2008 defines what an obstacle-free route is and requires that a minimum of one obstacle-free route is provided that interconnects the following points and services if provided: (...). 3. The technical details relating to the obstacle-free routes are given in clauses 4.1.2.3.1 and 4.1.2.3.2. OJ L 64, 7.3.2008, p. 72 2 RECOMMENDATION N. ERA-REC-02-20i3/REC of [6th May 20i3] on the adoption of the revised Technical Specification for Interoperability relating to persons with reduced mobility (PRM TSI). Page 2 of5

ii: 1 OPINION ERA/OPI/2014-4 4. The revised PRM TSI received a positive vote during the RISC 69 in January 2014 (Item 03 - ST27ENO3) and it is planned to be adopted by the Commission in the second half of 2014 in order to be applicable from 1 January 2015. 5. The revised PRM TSI indicates its scope, with regards to infrastructure, in the clause 2.1.1: This T5l applies to all the public areas of stations dedicated to the transport of passengers that are controlled by the railway undertaking, infrastructure manager or station manager. This includes the provision of information, the purchase of a ticket and its validation if needed, and the possibility to wait for the train. 6. The revised PRM TSI defines the obstacle-free route in clause 2.3. In clause 4.2.1.2, it requires that obstacle-free routes are provided that interconnect the following public areas of the infrastructure if provided: (...) 7. The technical details relative to the obstacle-free routes are then given in clauses 4.2.1.2.1, 4.2.1.2.2 and 4.2.1.2.3 of the revised PRM TSI. 3 Analysis 1. In the PRM TSI 2008, requirements for the obstacle-free routes are under clause 4.1.2.3, while the requirements for stairs are under clause 4.1.2.15: both are subclauses of the same clause 4.1.2 that gather the functional and technical specifications for the infrastructure subsystem. This demonstrates that the requirements for stairs are not a subclause of the requirements for the obstacle-free routes. Consequently, requirements for stairs do not apply only to the stairs located along obstacle-free routes. 2. Clause 4.1.2.15 of the PRM TSl 2008 gathers several requirements for stairs: as explained in point 1 above, these requirements shall apply to all stairs that are in the scope of the TSI, unless otherwise specified in the requirement itself. This is the case only for the second requirement, which says that Staircases on the main route shall have a minimum obstacle-free width of 1 600 mm measured between the handrails. (...). The requirement itself clearly specifies to which staircases it applies, the main route being defined by the applicant, together with the Notified Body, at the beginning of a project. 3. Similarly, clause 4.1.2.16 of the PRM TSI 2008 defines requirements for handrails: these requirements shall apply to all handrails that equip stairs and ramps within the scope of the TSI. 4. In the revised PRM TSI, the technical requirements for staircases and handrails have been gathered under the general clause 4.2.1.2 entitled Obstacle-free route because all routes that interconnect different areas of a station, within the scope of the TSI, are required to be obstacle-free routes. This Page 3 of 5

OPINION ERA/OPI/2014-4 is clearly meant by the wording of clause 4.2.1.2 of the revised PRM TSI requiring: obstacle free routes shall be provided (...) where the clause 4.1.2.3 of the PRM TSI 2008 did only require: a minimum of one obstacle-free route shall be provided (...) 5. This does not mean that all parts of an obstacle-free route shall be equally accessible by all passengers: the definition provided in clause 2.3 of the revised PRM TSl clarifies that the route can be divided to better meet the needs of all persons with disabilities and reduced mobility. The combination of all the parts of the obstacle free route constitutes the route accessible for all persons with disabilities and reduced mobility. Consequently, there does not need to be a continuous and coherent tactile path to each staircase, provided that there is one staircase that is equipped with such a tactile path. But each staircase situated along a route interconnecting the public areas of the infrastructure within the scope of the revised PRM TSI is a part of an obstacle-free route, and as such it needs to satisfy the requirements of clause 4.2.1.2. 6. It can be reminded that the chapter 4 of the TSI describes the target system. It respects as much as possible the principles of the design for all approach, in particular the Equitable Use and the Flexibility in Use. The chapter 4 applies in particular to new subsystems for which it is reasonable to expect that the design for all approach will be respected; for existing subsystems, the transition to the target system is decided according to the stipulations of the chapter 7 of the TSI, that gives flexibility regarding the progressive elimination of obstacles so as to reach the target system. 4 The opinion 1. The Agency is of the opinion that, according to both the PRM TSI 2008 and the revised PRM TSI, the requirements for staircases (especially tactile and contrasting bands and double handrails) shall apply to all staircases within the scope of the TSI. 2. This is clearly meant in the PRM TSI 2008 by the structure of the document, with the requirements for stairs being independent and at the same hierarchical level that the requirements for obstaclefree routes. 3. This is also clearly meant in the proposed revised PRM TSI, according to which all staircases of a station, within the scope of the TSI, are parts of an obstacle-free route. 4. The Agency proposes to clarify the point above in the application guide of the revised PRM TSI, that is currently being finalised. 2014 Executive Director Page 4 of 5