INTRODUCTION TO THE CONSPIRACY COUNTS. defendants Ahmed Ferhani and Mohamed Mamdouh planned to bomb synagogues and

Similar documents
Case 2:17-cr PLM ECF No. 54 filed 12/05/17 PageID.113 Page 1 of 20 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN NORTHERN DIVISION

Case 1:16-cr KBJ Document 6 Filed 12/15/16 Page 1 of 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Court of Appeals of Ohio

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA UNITED STATES OF AMERICA : CRIMINAL NO. 10 -

religious movement that effectively ruled Afghanistan from the mid-1990s until the United States1 military intervention in

The Anti-Gang Bill, 2017

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ALASKA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

S19A0439. CARPENTER v. THE STATE. Benjamin Carpenter was tried by a DeKalb County jury and. convicted of murder and possession of a firearm during the

THE STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE NO. 04-S-104 STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE TIMOTHY GEDDES OPINION AND ORDER

Introduction to Criminal Law

SCHEDULE OF LESSER INCLUDED OFFENSES COMMENT ON SCHEDULE OF LESSER INCLUDED OFFENSES

FEDERAL STATUTES. 10 USC 921 Article Larceny and wrongful appropriation

CRIMINAL LAW ESSAY SERIES ESSAY QUESTION #1 MODEL ANSWER

The Bill of Rights: A Charter of Liberties Although the terms are used interchangeably, a useful distinction can be made between

Case 1:14-cr MLW Document 1 Filed 07/15/14 Page 1 of 14

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT ALEXANDRIA DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Forfeiture INDICTMENT

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Alachua County. Robert P. Cates, Judge.

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE IN AND FOR NEW CASTLE COUNTY

Introduction to The Bill of Rights. The First 10 Amendments

The Complainant submits this complaint to the Court and states that there is probable cause to believe Defendant committed the following offense(s):

UNIFORM FELONY BAIL SCHEDULE (PENAL CODE)

GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF NORTH CAROLINA SESSION BILL DRAFT 2017-MS-165 [v.6] (02/21)

The Complainant submits this complaint to the Court and states that there is probable cause to believe Defendant committed the following offense(s):

STATE OF OHIO DEWAYNE BRAY

Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA. Alexandria Division

IR 26 CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS CHAPTER 13

DAMON PHINEAS JORDAN OPINION BY v. Record No JUSTICE DONALD W. LEMONS September 12, 2013 COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA

DISTRICT ATTORNEY QUEENS COUNTY QUEENS BOULEVARD KEW GARDENS, NEW YORK

NAME DATE CLASS. In the first column, answer the questions based on what you know before you study. After this lesson, complete the last column.

THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS CUYAHOGA COUNTY, OHIO ) ) ) ) ) )

ADMINISTRATION OF JUSTICE GENERAL ASPECTS OF CRIMINAL LAW. Name: Period: Row:

SIM GILL DISTRICT ATTORNEY

Law School for Journalists

The Bill of Rights CHAPTER 6. Table of Contents. ESSENTIAL QUESTION: How do societies balance individual and community rights?

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES. OCTOBER TERM, 2015 LEVON DEAN, JR., Petitioner. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent

State of New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division Third Judicial Department

H 5119 S T A T E O F R H O D E I S L A N D

SEALING YOUR JUVENILE RECORDS

Section 11 Impossibility Relying only on your own intuitions of justice, what liability and punishment, if any, does John Henry Ivy deserve?

2011 OMNIBUS BILL Effective Date 28 August, 2011 K. L. Jamison

SUPREME COURT: COUNTY OF NASSAU STATE OF NEW YORK. THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK -against- RANDY STITH, Defendant

Social Studies 7 Civics CH 4.2: OTHER BILL OF RIGHTS PROTECTIONS

Police Shooting of Ruka Hemopo

Case 2:17-cr PLM ECF No. 15 filed 11/21/17 PageID.22 Page 1 of 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN NORTHERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN NORTHERN DIVISION. Plaintiff, Case Number BC v. Honorable David M.

COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS DEFENDANT S MOTION TO DISMISS COUNT I. Defendant Richard L, pursuant to Commonwealth v. McCarthy, 385 Mass.

A Guide to the Bill of Rights

NOT RECOMMENDED FOR FULL TEXT PUBLICATION File Name: 06a0071n.06 Filed: January 26, No

MARIN COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE GENERAL ORDER. DATE Chapter 5- Operations GO /11/2014 PAGE 1 of 6. Immigration Status (Trust Act implementation)

SEALED UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MIDLAND-ODESSA DIVISION

CHAPTER Committee Substitute for Committee Substitute for House Bill No. 113

H 7645 S T A T E O F R H O D E I S L A N D

SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

TIER 2 EXCLUSIONARY CRIMES

CHAPTER Committee Substitute for Committee Substitute for House Bill No. 667

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON DIVISION II

Packet Two: Criminal Law and Procedure Chapter 1: Background

FINAL EXAMINATION DIRECTIONS: Write your answers on the ANSWER SHEET provided.

Immigration Violations

NOT DESIGNATED FOR PUBLICATION. No. 113,969 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF KANSAS. STATE OF KANSAS, Appellee, DAVID GARCIA, Appellant.

FEDERAL PROSECUTION: AN ALTERNATIVE REMEDY. Making a Federal Case Against Domestic Violence

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI WESTERN DIVISION GOVERNMENT'S PROPOSED JURY INSTRUCTIONS

North Carolina Sheriffs Association

First Amendment. Original language:

Select Florida Mandatory Minimum Laws

In the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Section 2 Creating the Bill of Rights

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF INDIANA

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF INDIANA

PUBLISH UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS TENTH CIRCUIT

Circuit Court for Baltimore City Case No IN THE COURT OF SPECIAL APPEALS

MINNESOTA UNIFORM FIREARM APPLICATION/RECEIPT PERMIT TO PURCHASE/TRANSFER (TYPE OR PRINT ONLY)

Criminal Litigation: Step-By-Step

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN MILWAUKEE DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS

NOT DESIGNATED FOR PUBLICATION. No. 118,787 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF KANSAS. STATE OF KANSAS, Appellee, COY RAY CARTMELL, Appellant.

COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA. KIMBERLY PAUL BARNEY OPINION BY v. Record No JUDGE WILLIAM G. PETTY JANUARY 8, 2019 COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA

Check Permit Type MINNESOTA UNIFORM FIREARM APPLICATION/RECEIPT PERMIT TO PURCHASE/TRANSFER (TYPE OR PRINT ONLY)

Regulation STUDENTS April 11, 2018 STUDENTS. Weapons and Other Prohibited Objects

H 7597 S T A T E O F R H O D E I S L A N D

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT CASE NO UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff Appellee,

Georgia Department of Human Services Georgia Senior Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) Application

4B1.1 GUIDELINES MANUAL November 1, 2014

CHAPTER Committee Substitute for House Bill No. 163

Forensics and Bill of Rights. Elkins

BAILEY v. UNITED STATES. certiorari to the united states court of appeals for the district of columbia circuit

The Complainant submits this complaint to the Court and states that there is probable cause to believe Defendant committed the following offense(s):

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI ST. JOSEPH DIVISION

Summary: First Step Act, S. 756 (115th Congress, 2018)

CHAPTER Committee Substitute for Committee Substitute for Committee Substitute for House Bill No. 165

... O P I N I O N ...

Court of Appeals of Ohio

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

APPRENDI v. NEW JERSEY 120 S. CT (2000)

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO KA-1783 STATE OF MISSISSIPPI BRIEF FOR THE APPELLEE

Case 2:19-cr RGD-RJK Document 3 Filed 02/07/19 Page 1 of 5 PageID# 4 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE June 19, 2018 Session

} SS. Cuyahoga County Court of Common Pleas Criminal Court Division. The State of Ohio, (A)

The Constitution: Of The United States of America. Elizabeth Garcia, Esq.

Transcription:

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK -against- AHMED FERHANI and MOHAMED MAMDOUH, Defendants. INDICTMENT INTRODUCTION TO THE CONSPIRACY COUNTS With regard to Counts One and Two of this Indictment, the Grand Jury charges that defendants Ahmed Ferhani and Mohamed Mamdouh planned to bomb synagogues and churches in Manhattan and elsewhere. They espoused a hatred of Jews and discussed their willingness to kill Jews. At times, they referred to their violent plans simply as, the cause. For the defendants, the cause meant taking steps to prepare for acts of violence against houses of worship, including acquiring funding and weapons, and training for attacks in the future. Their goal was to send a message of violence to non-muslims, including Americans, Christians, and, primarily, Jews. FIRST COUNT: THE GRAND JURY OF THE COUNTY OF NEW YORK, by this indictment, accuses the defendants, AHMED FERHANI and MOHAMED MAMDOUH, of the crime of CONSPIRACY IN THE FOURTH DEGREE AS A CRIME OF TERRORISM, in violation of Penal Law 105.10(1)/490.25(1), committed as follows: The defendants, in the County of New York and elsewhere, during the period from in or about April, 2011, to in or about May, 2011, with intent that conduct constituting a

class B and class C felony be performed, to wit, Criminal Possession of a Weapon in the First and Second Degrees, did agree with one and more persons to engage in and cause the performance of such conduct, with intent to intimidate and coerce a civilian population. SECOND COUNT: CONSPIRACY IN THE FOURTH DEGREE AS A HATE CRIME, in violation of Penal Law 105.10(1)/485.05(1)(b), committed as follows: The defendants, in the County of New York and elsewhere, during the period from in or about October, 2010, to in or about May, 2011, with intent that conduct constituting a class B and class C felony be performed, to wit, Criminal Mischief in the First Degree and Arson in the Third Degree, did agree with one and more persons to engage in and cause the performance of such conduct, and intentionally committed the act and acts constituting the offenses in whole and in substantial part because of a belief and perception regarding the race, color, national origin, ancestry, gender, religion, religious practice, age, disability and sexual orientation of a person, regardless of whether the belief and perception were correct. OVERT ACTS In furtherance of each charged conspiracy, and to effect their objects, the following overt acts, among others, were committed in New York County and elsewhere: 1. On or about April 12, 2011, defendants Ferhani and Mamdouh, along with an Undercover Detective known to the Grand Jury (the Undercover Detective ), met at defendant Ferhani s residence in Queens County.

2. On or about April 12, 2011, at defendant Ferhani s residence in Queens County, defendants Ferhani and Mamdouh, along with the Undercover Detective, said, in substance, that they wanted to blow up a synagogue. 3. On or about April 12, 2011, at defendant Ferhani s residence in Queens County, defendants Ferhani and Mamdouh and the Undercover Detective discussed, in substance, how to bomb a synagogue without being caught by law enforcement. 4. On or about April 12, 2011, at defendant Ferhani s residence in Queens County, defendant Ferhani asked the Undercover Detective, in substance, and in the presence of defendant Mamdouh, if the Undercover Detective could get in contact with someone about how to make a bomb. 5. On or about April 12, 2011, at defendant Ferhani s residence in Queens County, defendant Mamdouh instructed the Undercover Detective, in substance, and in the presence of defendant Ferhani, to discuss bombs only in person and not over the phone. 6. On or about April 12, 2011, at defendant Ferhani s residence in Queens County, defendant Ferhani stated, in substance, that they should dress up as Jewish worshippers, attend a service at a synagogue and leave a bag containing a bomb inside the synagogue before departing. 7. On or about April 12, 2011, at defendant Ferhani s residence in Queens County, defendant Mamdouh stated, in substance, that he had no problem killing Jews. 8. On or about April 18, 2011, defendants Ferhani and Mamdouh and the Undercover Detective met at defendant Ferhani s residence in Queens County.

9. On or about April 18, 2011, defendants Ferhani and Mamdouh and the Undercover Detective watched a documentary about Zionists inside Ferhani s residence in Queens County. 10. On or about April 18, 2011, at defendant Ferhani s residence in Queens County, defendant Ferhani stated, in substance, that he wanted to dress up as a Jewish worshipper, attend a service at a synagogue and leave a bomb inside the synagogue after everyone left. 11. On or about April 18, 2011, in the vicinity of defendant Ferhani s residence in Queens County, defendant Ferhani stated, in substance, that he wanted to bring guns into the synagogue so that if anything went wrong with their plan, they could shoot the people inside the synagogue. 12. On or about April 20, 2011, defendant Ferhani and the Undercover Detective met at defendant Ferhani s residence in Queens County. 13. On or about April 20, 2011, at defendant Ferhani s residence in Queens County, defendant Ferhani stated, in substance, that he wanted to blow up the biggest synagogue in Manhattan. 14. On or about April 20, 2011, at defendant Ferhani s residence in Queens County, defendant Ferhani stated, in substance, that he was selling drugs to raise money to support the cause. 15. During the course of the conspiracy, in Queens County, defendant Ferhani sold crack cocaine to raise money to support the cause. 16. During the course of the conspiracy, in Queens County, defendant Ferhani sold marihuana to raise money to support the cause.

17. During the course of the conspiracy, in Queens County, defendant Ferhani sold Percocet pills to raise money to support the cause. 18. On or about May 3, 2011, while riding in a car with the Undercover Detective in Queens County, defendant Ferhani stated, in substance, that he wanted to buy guns and grenades. 19. On or about May 3, 2011, while riding in a car with the Undercover Detective, defendant Ferhani stated, in substance, that they could throw grenades two at a time into a synagogue. 20. On or about May 3, 2011, while riding in a car with the Undercover Detective in Queens County, defendant Ferhani instructed the Undercover Detective, in substance, not to use the word synagogue on the phone. 21. On or about May 3, 2011, while riding in a car with the Undercover Detective in Queens County, defendant Ferhani stated, in substance, that he wanted to use grenades to blow up churches. 22. On or about May 5, 2011, defendant Ferhani and the Undercover Detective traveled from Queens into Manhattan by car for a meeting to discuss defendant Ferhani s interest in purchasing guns and grenades. 23. On or about May 5, 2011, defendant Ferhani and the Undercover Detective met with a second Undercover Detective (the second Undercover Detective ), whom defendant Ferhani believed was a weapons dealer, inside a car parked in the vicinity of West 58 th Street and 12 th Avenue in Manhattan. 24. On or about May 5, 2011, in the vicinity of West 58 th Street and 12 th Avenue in Manhattan, Ferhani said, in substance, that he wanted to buy grenades.

25. On or about May 5, 2011, in the vicinity of West 58 th Street and 12 th Avenue in Manhattan, defendant Ferhani said, in substance, that he would pay six hundred dollars to buy two guns. 26. On or about May 9, 2011, in Queens County, defendant Ferhani stated, in substance, that he wanted to blow up a synagogue as a warning to the Jewish people. 27. On or about May 9, 2011, in Queens County, defendant Ferhani stated, in substance, that he wanted to blow up ten synagogues at one time. 28. On or about May 11, 2011, defendants Ferhani and Mamdouh and the Undercover Detective met at defendant Ferhani s residence in Queens County. 29. On or about May 11, 2011, at defendant Ferhani s residence in Queens County, defendants Ferhani and Mamdouh and the Undercover Detective discussed, in substance, their plan to purchase two Brownings, one Smith & Wesson, and a grenade that day. 30. On or about May 11, 2011, defendant Ferhani directed defendant Mamdouh, in substance, to transport the Smith & Wesson and the grenade from Manhattan to Brooklyn after they were purchased. 31. On or about May 11, 2011, defendant Mamdouh agreed, in substance, that he would transport the Smith & Wesson and the grenade from Manhattan to Brooklyn after they were purchased. 32. On or about May 11, 2011, defendant Ferhani told defendant Mamdouh, in substance, that defendant Ferhani and the Undercover Detective would transport the two Brownings to sell to another individual.

33. On or about May 11, 2011, defendant Mamdouh told defendant Ferhani, in substance, to put the weapons in the trunk of the car. 34. On or about May 11, 2011, defendants Ferhani and Mamdouh and the Undercover Detective traveled from Queens into Manhattan by car to purchase the two Brownings, the Smith & Wesson, and the grenade. 35. On or about May 11, 2011, while en route to Manhattan, defendants Ferhani and Mamdouh said, in substance, that they wanted to blow up buildings in New York City. 36. On or about May 11, 2011, while en route to Manhattan, defendant Mamdouh said, in substance, that C4, an explosive, could blow up a whole city block. 37. On or about May 11, 2011, defendant Mamdouh got out of the car in the vicinity of West 57 th Street and 9 th Avenue in Manhattan to wait for defendant Ferhani and the Undercover Detective to return. 38. On or about May 11, 2011, defendant Ferhani and the Undercover Detective met the second Undercover Detective inside a car that was parked in the vicinity of West 58 th Street and 12 th Avenue in Manhattan. 39. On or about May 11, 2011, while inside the car in the vicinity of West 58 th Street and 12 th Avenue in Manhattan, defendant Ferhani gave one hundred dollars to the second Undercover Detective as payment for the weapons. 40. On or about May 11, 2011, while inside the car in the vicinity of West 58 th Street and 12 th Avenue in Manhattan, defendant Ferhani told the second Undercover Detective, in substance, that he would give him additional money later.

41. On or about May 11, 2011, defendant Ferhani told the second Undercover Detective, in substance, that he wanted to purchase additional weapons in the future. 42. On or about May 11, 2011, while inside the car in the vicinity of West 58 th Street and 12 th Avenue in Manhattan, defendant Ferhani asked the second Undercover Detective, in substance, if the second Undercover Detective could sell defendant Ferhani a silencer. 43. On or about May 11, 2011, while inside the car in the vicinity of West 58 th Street and 12 th Avenue in Manhattan, defendant Ferhani asked the second Undercover Detective, in substance, if the second Undercover Detective could sell defendant Ferhani a bulletproof vest. 44. On or about May 11, 2011, while inside the car in the vicinity of West 58 th Street and 12 th Avenue in Manhattan, defendant Ferhani asked the second Undercover Detective, in substance, if the second Undercover Detective could sell defendant Ferhani a police radio interceptor. 45. On or about May 11, 2011, while inside the car in the vicinity of West 58 th Street and 12 th Avenue in Manhattan, defendant Ferhani asked the second Undercover Detective, in substance, the price for a box of grenades. 46. On or about May 11, 2011, while inside the car in the vicinity of West 58 th Street and 12 th Avenue in Manhattan, defendant Ferhani said to the second Undercover Detective, in substance, that he was purchasing the weapons for the cause. 47. On or about May 11, 2011, while inside the car in the vicinity of West 58 th Street and 12 th Avenue in Manhattan, defendant Ferhani told the second Undercover

Detective that Muslims were getting abused all over the world and that defendant Ferhani was not going to accept it. 48. On or about May 11, 2011, while inside the car in the vicinity of West 58 th Street and 12 th Avenue in Manhattan, defendant Ferhani possessed two Browning.380 caliber semiautomatic pistols. 49. On or about May 11, 2011, while inside the car in the vicinity of West 58 th Street and 12 th Avenue in Manhattan, defendant Ferhani possessed ammunition for the two Browning.380 caliber semiautomatic pistols. 50. On or about May 11, 2011, while inside the car in Manhattan, defendant Ferhani possessed a Smith & Wesson 9 millimeter semiautomatic pistol. 51. On or about May 11, 2011, while inside the car in Manhattan, defendant Ferhani possessed ammunition for the Smith & Wesson 9 millimeter semiautomatic pistol. 52. On or about May 11, 2011, while inside the car in Manhattan, defendant Ferhani possessed an inert grenade. 53. On or about May 11, 2011, defendant Ferhani placed two Browning.380 caliber semiautomatic pistols, a Smith & Wesson 9 millimeter semiautomatic pistol, and an inert grenade inside the trunk of the car. THIRD COUNT: ATTEMPTED CRIMINAL POSSESSION OF A WEAPON IN THE FIRST

DEGREE AS A CRIME OF TERRORISM, in violation of Penal Law 110.00/265.04(1)/490.25(1), committed as follows: The defendants, in the County of New York, on or about May 11, 2011, attempted to possess an explosive substance, to wit, a grenade, with intent to use the same unlawfully against the person and property of another, and with intent to intimidate and coerce a civilian population. FOURTH COUNT: CRIMINAL POSSESSION OF A WEAPON IN THE SECOND DEGREE AS A CRIME OF TERRORISM, in violation of Penal Law 265.03(3)/490.25(1), an armed felony, committed as follows: The defendants, in the County of New York, on or about May 11, 2011, possessed a loaded firearm, to wit, a Smith & Wesson 9 millimeter semiautomatic pistol, said possession not being in the defendants homes or places of business, with intent to intimidate and coerce a civilian population. FIFTH COUNT: CRIMINAL POSSESSION OF A WEAPON IN THE SECOND DEGREE AS A CRIME OF TERRORISM, in violation of Penal Law 265.03(3)/490.25(1), an armed felony, committed as follows:

The defendants, in the County of New York, on or about May 11, 2011, possessed a loaded firearm, to wit, a Beretta/Browning.380 caliber semiautomatic pistol, said possession not being in the defendants homes or places of business, with intent to intimidate and coerce a civilian population. SIXTH COUNT: CRIMINAL POSSESSION OF A WEAPON IN THE SECOND DEGREE AS A CRIME OF TERRORISM, in violation of Penal Law 265.03(3)/490.25(1), an armed felony, committed as follows: The defendants, in the County of New York, on or about May 11, 2011, possessed a loaded firearm, to wit, a Beretta/Browning.380 caliber semiautomatic pistol, said possession not being in the defendants homes or places of business, with intent to intimidate and coerce a civilian population. SEVENTH COUNT: CRIMINAL POSSESSION OF A WEAPON IN THE SECOND DEGREE AS A CRIME OF TERRORISM, in violation of Penal Law 265.03(1)(b)/490.25(1), an armed felony, committed as follows: The defendants, in the County of New York, on or about May 11, 2011, possessed a loaded firearm, to wit, a Smith & Wesson 9 millimeter semiautomatic pistol, with intent to

use the same unlawfully against another, and with intent to intimidate and coerce a civilian population. EIGHTH COUNT: CRIMINAL POSSESSION OF A WEAPON IN THE THIRD DEGREE AS A CRIME OF TERRORISM, in violation of Penal Law 265.02(5)(i)/490.25(1), committed as follows: The defendants, in the County of New York, on or about May 11, 2011, possessed three firearms, to wit, a Smith & Wesson 9 millimeter semiautomatic pistol and two Beretta/Browning.380 caliber semiautomatic pistols, with intent to intimidate and coerce a civilian population. NINTH COUNT: defendant, AHMED FERHANI, of the crime of CRIMINAL SALE OF A FIREARM IN THE THIRD DEGREE AS A CRIME OF TERRORISM, in violation of Penal Law 265.11(2)/490.25(1), committed as follows: The defendant Ahmed Ferhani, in the County of New York, on or about May 11, 2011, not being a person authorized pursuant to law to possess a firearm, unlawfully possessed a firearm, to wit, a Beretta/Browning.380 caliber semiautomatic pistol, with intent to sell it, and with intent to intimidate and coerce a civilian population.

TENTH COUNT: defendant, AHMED FERHANI, of the crime of CRIMINAL SALE OF A FIREARM IN THE THIRD DEGREE AS A CRIME OF TERRORISM, in violation of Penal Law 265.11(2)/490.25(1), committed as follows: The defendant Ahmed Ferhani, in the County of New York, on or about May 11, 2011, not being a person authorized pursuant to law to possess a firearm, unlawfully possessed a firearm, to wit, a Beretta/Browning.380 caliber semiautomatic pistol, with intent to sell it, and with intent to intimidate and coerce a civilian population. CYRUS R. VANCE, JR. District Attorney