UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) WHEREAS, Portland General Electric Company ( PGE ) is an Oregon corporation;

Similar documents
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA

Case 1:12-cv RLW Document 48 Filed 09/04/12 Page 1 of 21 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Case 1:16-cv JDB Document 33 Filed 12/28/16 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Case 1:12-cv RLW Document 47-1 Filed 08/31/12 Page 1 of 21 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Case 1:10-cv PLF Document 17 Filed 08/04/11 Page 1 of 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Case 1:10-cv JEB Document 13 Filed 08/03/11 Page 1 of 2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Good Neighbor Agreement

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF OREGON

Case 1:12-cv CKK Document 12 Filed 06/21/12 Page 1 of 2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE STATE OF OREGON FOR THE COUNTY OF MULTNOMAH

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT. This Settlement Agreement is made by and between: 1) Sierra Club; and 2)

Case 2:13-cv JCJ Document 23-1 Filed 05/06/14 Page 1 of 13 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Agreement for Net Metering and Interconnection Services (Level 1, 2 and 3 Interconnection)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) COMPLAINT FOR DECLARATORY AND INJUNCTIVE RELIEF

Case 1:12-cv RBW Document 44-1 Filed 01/29/14 Page 1 of 18 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

3. Retirement of Certain Coal-Fired Generating Units. DEC and PEC will retire coal-fired electrical generating units ( EGUs ), as follows:

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA CONSENT DECREE

Case 1:13-cv GK Document 27-1 Filed 04/28/14 Page 1 of 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Case 1:12-cv RPM Document 8 Filed 07/11/12 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 5 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Case 1:16-cv Document 2-1 Filed 08/18/16 Page 1 of 38 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

COLORADO C-PACE NEW ENERGY IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT PARTICIPATION AGREEMENT

Case 3:14-cv SI Document 240 Filed 11/21/17 Page 1 of 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF OREGON

ARKANSAS DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY. PO Box 1911 AFIN Deer Park, TX CONSENT ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER

Intervenor-Respondent. Contested Case Hearing in the above-identified consolidated cases (the "Consolidated Appeals").

SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT

Case 1:12-cv JDB Document 25-2 Filed 08/20/12 Page 1 of 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

ENRD Deputy Assistant Attorneys General and Section Chiefs. Jeffrey H. Wood, Acting Assistant Attorney General

COMPLIANCE ORDER ON CONSENT Case No

Case KRH Doc 3040 Filed 07/12/16 Entered 07/12/16 17:55:33 Desc Main Document Page 62 of 369

Getty Realty Corp. (Exact name of registrant as specified in charter)

Case 2:06-cv R-CW Document 437 Filed 10/12/12 Page 1 of 11 Page ID #:7705

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Plaintiff, Defendant.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI EASTERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF OREGON PORTLAND DIVISION

Case 2:10-cv Document 59-1 Filed 11/30/11 Page 1 of 18 PageID #: 819

SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND RELEASE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA SOUTH BEND DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND CONSENT DECREE. I. Background

Proposed Form of Satellite Sewer System Agreement Pursuant to Paragraph 13 of Consent Decree

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MONTANA MISSOULA DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Casteel Custom Bottling

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN. v. Case No. 01-C-0928 SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT INDEX TO SECTIONS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

ORAL ARGUMENT NOT YET SCHEDULED IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CONSENT DECREE

INTERLOCAL COOPERATION AGREEMENT

Case 5:07-cv VAP-JCR Document 11 Filed 06/14/2008 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA EASTERN DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN. Civil Action No.: [PROPOSED] CONSENT DECREE. Press Release.

SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND GENERAL RELEASE RECITALS

Case KG Doc 2912 Filed 08/17/17 Page 1 of 2 IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE : : : : : :

a. Collectively, this law and regulations adopted under this title are to be known as the Mashantucket Pequot Tribal Clean Air Program (CAP).

Case 1:19-cv Document 1 Filed 01/09/19 Page 1 of 15 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS

Case 4:08-cv RH-WCS Document 90 Filed 08/25/09 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS. Judge CONSENT DECREE

BACKGROUND. this Agreement. 1 Due to privacy concerns, pseudonyms are used in place of Mother Smith s and Abraham Smith s legal names in

WYNN RESORTS, LIMITED (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS COUNTY DEPARTMENT, CHANCERY DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON FOR KING COUNTY. Plaintiff, Defendant.

Case 1:16-cv WHP Document 4-1 Filed 08/18/16 Page 1 of 10 NO. 1:16-CV-6544

SITE ACCESS AGREEMENT. between BROWARD COUNTY. and ENVIRONMENTAL RISK MANAGEMENT, INC.

EEOC & Rodriguez, et al. v. Dynamic Medical Services, Inc.

CASE 0:12-cv RHK-JSM Document 9 Filed 02/01/13 Page 1 of 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA

LIMITED ENVIRONMENTAL INDEMNITY AGREEMENT

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION

ARKANSAS POLLUTION CONTROL and ECOLOGY COMMISSION REGULATION NO. 26 REGULATIONS OF THE ARKANSAS OPERATING AIR PERMIT PROGRAM

PRE-ANNEXATION DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT

RULE 2520 FEDERALLY MANDATED OPERATING PERMITS (Adopted June 15, 1995, Amended June 21, 2001)

Case 8:15-cv JLS-KES Document 43-4 Filed 07/25/17 Page 2 of 39 Page ID #:440 SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT RECITALS

HDCP RESELLER ASSOCIATE AGREEMENT W I T N E S S E T H

CITY OF FORTUNA, Defendant. /

STATE OIL AND GAS BOARP

SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT. WHEREAS, on August 10, 2011, Plaintiffs Sierra Club and WildEarth Guardians filed

SERVICE MARK AGREEMENT

The Department shall administer the air quality program of the State. (1973, c. 821, s. 6; c. 1262, s. 23; 1977, c. 771, s. 4; 1987, c. 827, s. 204.

United States v. Westlake Services, LLC, et al. (C.D. Cal.), Civil No. 2:17-cv-07125

Case3:14-cv Document2-1 Filed09/03/14 Page1 of 51 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

STIPULATED SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT 05-CV-274-HA

Summer Special Milk Program Program Agreement

PAYMENT IN LIEU OF TAXES AGREEMENT

Case 6:13-cv AA Document 55-1 Filed 10/23/15 Page 1 of 38 STIPULATED CLASS AND COLLECTIVE ACTION SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT RECITALS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. RIVER WATCH, non-profit

Case 1:19-cv Document 3 Filed 01/16/19 Page 1 of 16 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. Case No.

Case 1:16-cv EGS Document 21 Filed 07/05/16 Page 1 of 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

JOINT MARKETING AND SALES REFERRAL AGREEMENT

GREEN ELECTRONICS COUNCIL UL ECOLOGO/EPEAT JOINT CERTIFICATION LICENSE AND PARTICIPATING MANUFACTURER AGREEMENT

Case 1:09-cv JLK Document 80-1 Filed 02/15/11 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 9 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

ORAL ARGUMENT NOT YET SCHEDULED IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

PLAINTIFF S EXHIBIT 1

FINAL ORDER AUTHORIZING USE OF CASH COLLATERAL GRANTING ADEQUATE PROTECTION AND SECURITY INTERESTS IN POST-PETITION PROPERTY

Case 1:18-cv Document 1 Filed 03/02/18 Page 1 of 19 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEV ADA. consented to the entry of this Consent Decree of Permanent Injunction (the "Decree"), without

Class Action Settlement Agreement

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION

SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND RELEASE

Case 9:16-cv RLR Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/15/2016 Page 1 of 6

Transcription:

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF OREGON PORTLAND DIVISION SIERRA CLUB, a non-profit corp., NORTHWEST ENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE CENTER, a non-profit corp., FRIENDS OF THE COLUMBIA GORGE, a non-profit corp., COLUMBIA RIVERKEEPER, a non-profit corp., and HELLS CANYON PRESERVATION COUNCIL, a non-profit corp., v. Plaintiffs, PORTLAND GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY, an Oregon Corporation, Defendant. Civil No.: 3:08-cv-01136-HA CONSENT DECREE WHEREAS, Portland General Electric Company ( PGE is an Oregon corporation; WHEREAS, PGE has been, at all times relevant to this lawsuit, the majority owner and operator of the Boardman Power Plant, which is located in Boardman, Oregon; WHEREAS, on January 15, 2008, Plaintiffs filed a notice of intent to sue PGE for declaratory and injunctive relief and civil penalties for alleged violations, at the Boardman facility, of the Clean Air Act.; WHEREAS, the Complaint in this matter was filed on September 30, 2008; WHEREAS, the Complaint seeks declaratory and injunctive relief, the imposition of civil penalties, and Plaintiffs attorneys fees and costs of litigation; Consent Decree Page 1

WHEREAS, PGE denies liability for the allegations set forth in the complaint; WHEREAS, Plaintiffs and Defendant (the Parties have negotiated this Consent Decree ( Decree in good faith and at arm s length and agree that the settlement of this action through this Consent Decree without further litigation avoids substantial risks and costs of a protracted proceeding, is in the public interest and provides certainty for utility customers and is a fair, reasonable, and appropriate means of resolving all claims in this action; WHEREAS, the Parties further anticipate that this Decree will achieve significant reductions of emissions from the Boardman Power Plant and thereby significantly improve air quality; WHEREAS, the Parties consent to the entry of this Decree without further trial, argument, or appeal; WHEREAS, pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 7604(c(3 of the Clean Air Act ( Act, this Consent Decree is being forwarded to the United States Department of Justice and to the United States Environmental Protection Agency ( EPA for the statutorily-mandated forty-five (45 day review period; NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby ORDERED AND DECREED as follows: 1. This Court has jurisdiction over the Parties and the subject matter of this action pursuant to 304 of the Clean Air Act, 42 U.S.C. 7604, the citizen suit provision of the Act, and pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1331. 2. Venue is proper in this judicial district under 304(c of the Act, 42 U.S.C. 7604(c, and under 28 U.S.C. 1391. Consent Decree Page 2

3. Upon entry, the provisions of this Consent Decree shall apply to and be binding upon the Parties, as well as the Parties officers, employees, agents, successors and assigns. 4. Commencing on or before December 31, 2020, PGE shall permanently cease the combustion of coal, coke, petroleum coke, lignite, waste coal, or tires at its Boardman plant. 5. For each calendar year from 2015 through 2020, annual emissions of sulfur dioxide from the Boardman coal-fired boiler shall not exceed the caps specified in the table below: Year 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Tons of SO 2 9,500 9,000 8,500 8,170 6,850 6,700 6. For the purposes of determining compliance with the SO2 emission caps in the previous paragraph, PGE shall measure all SO 2 emissions using continuous emissions monitoring systems ( CEMS certified and operated in compliance with the version of 40 C.F.R. 75.33 in effect as of the date of lodging of this Decree. However, for purposes of compliance with this Decree, the missing data procedures in Table 1 of that version of 40 C.F.R. Part 75 for monitor data availability of 90 or more, but below 95 may be applied for all periods of monitor data availability below 90 percent. By every April 15 beginning April 15, 2016 and ending April 15, 2021, PGE shall report to plaintiffs Boardman s total SO 2 emissions (in tons for the previous calendar year. 7. Within 180 days of entry of this Decree, PGE shall submit an application to the Oregon Department of Environmental Quality to modify the Boardman Title V permit to incorporate into that permit the emission caps set forth in Paragraph 5 as applicable Consent Decree Page 3

requirements. During the term of the Consent Decree, once the emission caps set forth in Paragraph 5 have been included in the Title V permit, PGE agrees not to seek modification of that permit to change or eliminate those caps for the Boardman coal-fired boiler. 8. Within 30 days of entry of the Decree, PGE agrees to pay $2,500,000 to the Oregon Community Foundation to be provided as grants for the following types of environmentally beneficial projects: a. 40% of the funds for (1 the purchase of interests in land in the Columbia River Gorge area to protect clean air and provide for habitat protection and/or (2 habitat restoration projects on federal or state land in the Columbia River Gorge area under the conditions set forth in Exhibit A; b. 25% of the funds for (1 the purchase of interests in lands in Union or Wallowa Counties to protect clean air and provide for habitat protection and/or (2 habitat restoration projects in the Eagle Cap or Hells Canyon Wilderness Areas under the conditions set forth in Exhibit A; c. 20% of funds to support renewable distributed generation projects under the conditions set forth in Exhibit A; and d. 15% of the funds to support community-based efforts to reduce air pollution and its impacts on public health and the environment in Oregon and Washington under the conditions set forth in Exhibit A. 9. None of the following organizations or their officers, employees, agents, successors or assigns, are eligible for the funds made available under the previous paragraph: Sierra Club, Northwest Environmental Defense Center, Friends of the Columbia Gorge, Columbia Riverkeeper, Hells Canyon Preservation Council, the Citizens Utility Board ( CUB, Consent Decree Page 4

the Renewable Northwest Project, Oregon Environmental Council, the NW Energy Coalition, or PGE. 10. PGE shall allow up to three representatives of the plaintiffs a reasonable opportunity to observe dry sorbent injection ( DSI pilot test(s at the Boardman Plant that are undertaken pursuant to OAR 340-223-0030(2 to evaluate compliance with sulfur dioxide emission limits and the potential side effects of compliance with those limits as set forth in the BART rule (OAR 340-223-0010 et seq. Plaintiffs shall coordinate with PGE regarding scheduling such observations and shall provide PGE the names of the representatives at least 30 days prior to such observations. Plaintiffs representatives shall submit to such procedures necessary to protect property and personal safety. No cameras or recording devices will be allowed. Plaintiffs understand and agree that plaintiffs and plaintiffs representatives will need to sign one or more confidentiality agreements regarding observation of the pilot test(s. 11. In the event that PGE submits studies to the Oregon Department of Environmental Quality pursuant to OAR 340-223-0030(2 in support of a petition to allow the applicable sulfur dioxide limits in the BART rule to be exceeded for the reasons set forth in OAR 340-223- 0030(3 (i.e., where compliance with the applicable limits would be technically infeasible, would prevent compliance with mercury emission limits, or would cause a significant air quality impact for particulate matter, PGE shall also provide to plaintiffs, upon request directed to PGE as provided in Paragraph 12 below, the data generated by the pilot test(s related to PGE s petition to exceed the applicable sulfur dioxide limits as set forth in OAR 340-223-0030(3 and any final reports generated related to the petition. Plaintiffs understand and agree that plaintiffs and plaintiffs representatives will need to sign one or more confidentiality agreements regarding any non-public data or final reports provided pursuant to this Paragraph. Consent Decree Page 5

12. Any notifications under this Consent Decree shall be directed to the individuals at the addresses specified below by United States Mail or Overnight Courier and e-mail, unless these individuals or their successors give notice of a change to the other Parties in writing. As to Plaintiffs: Aubrey Baldwin Pacific Environmental Advocacy Center 10015 SW Terwilliger Blvd. Portland, OR 97219 e-mail: abaldwin@lclark.edu As to Defendant: Stephen A. Redshaw Associate General Counsel Portland General Electric Co. 121 SW Salmon Street 1WTC1301 Portland, OR 97204 e-mail: stephen.redshaw@pgn.com 13. The Parties agree to cooperate in good faith in order to obtain the Court s review and entry of this Consent Decree. 14. Pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 7604(c(3, this Consent Decree shall be lodged with the Court and simultaneously provided to the United States for review and comment for a period not to exceed forty-five (45 days. 15. If the United States does not object or intervene within forty-five (45 days of receipt, the Parties shall submit a joint motion to the Court seeking entry of the Consent Decree. 16. Entry of this Consent Decree shall resolve any and all claims of Plaintiffs under the Clean Air Act and Oregon s State Implementation Plan relating to any actions taken by PGE at the Boardman Power Plant prior to entry of the Decree, including but not limited to those claims and actions alleged or that could have been alleged in the Complaint and Notice Letter in Consent Decree Page 6

this action. The failure of any Party to comply with any requirement contained in this Consent Decree will not excuse the obligation to comply with other requirements contained herein. 17. This Consent Decree constitutes the final, complete and exclusive agreement and understanding among the Parties with respect to the settlement embodied in this Consent Decree, and supersedes all prior agreements and understandings among the Parties related to the subject matter herein. No document, representation, inducement, agreement, understanding, or promise constitutes any part of this Consent Decree or the settlement it represents, nor shall they be used in construing the terms of this Consent Decree. 18. Within 30 days of entry of this Decree, PGE agrees to transfer by wire to Pacific Environmental Advocacy Center the amount of $1,000,000 to cover plaintiffs attorneys fees, plaintiffs expert witness fees, and plaintiffs costs for this case through the date of lodging. Counsel for Plaintiffs shall provide wire transfer instructions to counsel for PGE at least ten (10 days prior to the date payment is due. 19. Plaintiffs expressly reserve their right to petition the Court for recovery of additional costs and fees incurred after the Consent Decree is lodged, including but not limited to their costs and fees incurred in any Consent Decree enforcement process. PGE expressly reserves its right to object to the recovery of any additional costs and fees. 20. Modifications to this Consent Decree may be made only upon written agreement of the Parties which shall be filed with the Court. 21. Pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 7604(c(3, the United States shall be provided with the opportunity to review and comment upon any proposed modification to this Consent Decree. 22. This Consent Decree shall remain an enforceable order of the Court until terminated pursuant to Paragraph 23. Consent Decree Page 7

23. Any party may move for termination of this Decree once PGE has met all of the requirements of the Decree. If no party moves for termination of the Decree, the Decree shall terminate automatically by its own terms as of June 30, 2021. In no event shall this Consent Decree terminate until the permits that PGE must apply for under the terms of this Consent Decree have been validly issued and have taken effect, except that the Decree shall terminate on June 30, 2021 even if the permitting authority has failed to issue the required permits. 24. Until termination of this Consent Decree, this Court shall retain jurisdiction over both the subject matter of this Consent Decree and the Parties to this Consent Decree to enforce the terms and conditions of this Consent Decree. During the term of this Consent Decree, any Party to the Consent Decree may apply to the Court for any relief necessary to construe or effectuate this Consent Decree. Prior to applying to the Court for relief, the Parties agree to meet and confer to determine whether the dispute can be resolved through informal negotiations among the Parties. As part of the meet and confer obligation, the Parties shall discuss whether to submit their dispute to a mutually-agreed-upon alternative dispute resolution forum rather than seeking Court intervention. 25. Each undersigned representative of the Parties certifies that he or she is fully authorized to enter into the terms and conditions of this Consent Decree and to execute and legally bind such Party to this document. 26. This Consent Decree may be signed in counterparts. THE UNDERSIGNED PARTIES enter into this Consent Decree and submit it to this Court for approval and entry. Consent Decree Page 8