USPTO Programs for Expediting Patent Prosecution: Accelerated Exam, Patent Prosecution Highway, Green Technology. Susan Perng Pan November 2010

Similar documents
Accelerated Examination. Presented by Hans Troesch, Principal Fish & Richardson P.C. March 2, 2010

PATENT PROSECUTION HIGHWAY

Strategies for Expediting U.S. Patent Prosecution. Rachel K. Pilloff

Moving Patent Applications Through the USPTO: Options for Applicants

Normal Examination Speed (2/2)

Accelerating the Acquisition of an Enforceable Patent: Bypassing the USPTO s Backlog Lawrence A. Stahl and Seth E. Boeshore

USPTO PATENT EXAMINATION ACCELERATION PROGRAMS AND PROPOSALS

PATENT PROSECUTION STRATEGIES IN AN AIA WORLD: SUCCEEDING WITH THE CHANGES

Prioritized Examination and New Prior Art defined for First-Inventor-to-File

Session Patent prosecution practice in Japan Tips for obtaining a patent in Japan - Part I -

Procedures to file a request to the JPO (Japan Patent Office) for Patent Prosecution Highway Pilot Program

Part I PPH using the national work products from the JPO

Fast Track. Strategies at the USPTO. Hillsborough County Bar Association. January 5, Anton Hopen. Smith & Hopen, PA

Annex 2 DEFINITIONS FOR TERMS AND FOR STATISTICS ON PROCEDURES

2011 Foley & Lardner LLP Attorney Advertising Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome Models used are not clients but may be representative

Delain Law Office, PLLC

Patent Prosecution Procedures under the Japanese Patent Law. Sera, Toyama, Matsukura & Kawaguchi

Procedures and Requirements for Filing a Request for Patent Prosecution. Highway Pilot Program (PPH) to the National Institute of Industrial Property

STRATEGIC CONSIDERATIONS IN COORDINATING ACCELERATION OF INTERNATIONAL PATENT PROSECUTION

Rule #154/2015 Current as of January, 2015

IP CONCLAVE 2010, MUMBAI STRATEGIES WITH US PATENT PRACTICE NAREN THAPPETA US PATENT ATTORNEY & INDIA PATENT AGENT BANGALORE, INDIA

United States Patent and Trademark Office and Japan Patent Office Collaborative Search. AGENCY: United States Patent and Trademark Office, Commerce.

The patent prosecution highway (PPH) is a bilateral and bidirectional mechanism

Prosecuting an Israel Patent Application and Beyond

Patent Prosecution Practice in Japan

Framework Provisions for the Global Patent Prosecution Highway System

Patent Prosecution Procedures: China & Canada Compared

Requirements and Procedures to File a Request to CIPO for the Patent Prosecution Highway (PPH)

Introduction. 1 These materials are public information and have been prepared solely for educational and entertainment purposes to contribute

PATENT PROSECUTION HIGHWAY (PPH) A PILOT PROGRAM BETWEEN JPO AND VIETNAM S NOIP

Understanding Patent Examiner Docketing & Workflow to Expedite Prosecution

DKPTO PPH Guidelines for Chinese applicants

Patent Prosecution Under The AIA

Re: JIPA Comments on the Proposed Enhanced Examination Timing Control Initiative in the United States

Navigating the Patent Prosecution Highway and Other Accelerated Filing Options

Get Your Design Patent Fast!

Patent Exam Fall 2015

(SUCCESSFUL) PATENT FILING IN THE US

GLOSSARY of patent related terms in the FOUR OFFICE STATISTICS REPORT 2010 EDITION

Newly Signed U.S. Patent Law Will Overhaul Patent Procurement, Enforcement and Defense

Intellectual Property Office is an operating name of the Patent Office

IPDAS Forms Library: A Complete List

James D. Hallenbeck (Officer, Minneapolis Office)

Introduction to Patent Prosecution Highway JAPAN PATENT OFFICE

August 31, I. Introduction

Procedures to file a request to the DPMA for Patent Prosecution Highway ("PPH") Pilot Program between the DPMA and the JPO

Procedures to file a request to the DPMA for Patent Prosecution Highway ( PPH ) Pilot Program between the DPMA and the NBPR

GLOSSARY of patent related terms in the IP5 STATISTICS REPORT 2015 EDITION

Novelty. Japan Patent Office

Patent Prosecution Highway Pilot Programme between the Intellectual Property Office of Singapore and the Korean Intellectual Property Office

Information Disclosure Statements 2017 BIRCH, STEWART, KOLASCH & BIRCH, LLP

UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE. REPORT TO CONGRESS on INTER PARTES REEXAMINATION. Executive Summary

GLOSSARY of patent related terms in the IP5 STATISTICS REPORT 2016 EDITION

Intellectual Property Office of the Philippines

Procedures to file a request to the DPMA for Patent Prosecution Highway ( PPH ) Pilot Program between the DPMA and the KIPO

John Doll Commissioner for Patents. February 1, 2006

IDS Practice; 2008 Patent Practice. Miku H. Mehta, Patent Attorney Sughrue Mion, PLLC

Patent protection in Latin America: Main provisions and recommended strategy

Changes To Implement the First Inventor To File Provisions of the Leahy-Smith America Invents Act Final Rules

United States Patent and Trademark Office. Patent Trial and Appeal Board

Hastings Science & Technology Law Journal

IPO CZ PPH Guidelines for Finnish filers/applicants. Procedures to file a request to the. for the Patent Prosecution Highway

America Invents Act: Patent Reform

Speed of processing at the EPO. Timely delivery of quality products

UNDERSTANDING THE BACKLOG PROBLEMS ASSOCIATED WITH REQUESTS FOR CONTINUED EXAMINATION PRACTICE

K&L Gates Webinar Current Developments in Patents. Peggy Focarino Commissioner for Patents September 13 th, 2012

PROCEDURES FOR INVALIDATING, CLARIFYING OR NARROWING A PATENT IN THE PATENT OFFICE UNDER THE AMERICA INVENTS ACT (AIA)

USPTO Implementation of the America Invents Act. Janet Gongola Patent Reform Coordinator Direct dial:

America Invents Act: Patent Reform

Subject: Establishes the administrative proceedings of the Pilot Program for Patent Prosecution Highway PPH Shared Priority Examination.

Considerations for the United States

EFFECTIVE DATES OF THE VARIOUS RULES AND REQUIREMENTS

New Rules: USPTO May Have Underestimated Impact

Aligning claim drafting and filing strategies to optimize protection in the EPO, GPTO and USPTO

Practice Tips for Foreign Applicants

Patent Prosecution in View of The America Invents Act. Overview

Presented to The Ohio State Bar Association. May 23, 2012

Procedures to file a request to the SPTO (Spanish Patent and Trademark Office) for Patent Prosecution Highway Pilot Program

Chapter 2 Internal Priority

PATENT COOPERATION TREATY (PCT): BENEFITS AND STRATEGIES FOR APPLICANTS. Seminar on WIPO Services and Initiatives Gary L. Montle Nashville, TN

WHAT TO EXPECT WHEN YOU RE EXPECTING A PATENT By R. Devin Ricci 1

Patent Prosecution Update

Policies of USPTO Director Kappos & U.S. Patent Law Reform

FINAL RULES IMPLEMENTING EIGHTEEN MONTH PUBLICATION OF PATENT APPLICATIONS

United States. Edwards Wildman. Author Daniel Fiorello

The application which is filed with the KIPO and on which the applicant files a request for the PCT-PPH must satisfy the following requirements:

4. COMPARISON OF THE INDIAN PATENT LAW WITH THE PATENT LAWS IN U.S., EUROPE AND CHINA

Aug.2014 JAPAN PATENT OFFICE

The European patent system

Changes at the PTO. October 21, 2011 Claremont Hotel. Steven C. Carlson Fish & Richardson P.C. Bradley Baugh North Weber & Baugh LLP

A New World (Patent) Order. How the US Patent Reform Act (AIA) Compares with European Patent Regulations

New Patent Application Rules Set to Take Effect November 1, 2007

Procedures to file a request to the Federal Service for Intellectual Property (Rospatent) for Patent Prosecution Highway Pilot Program

patents grant only the right to stop others from making, using and selling the invention

Topic 1: Challenges and Options in Substantive Patent Examination. Lutz Mailänder Head, International Cooperation on Examination and Training Section

Patent Rights Retention by the Contractor (Short Form)

Intellectual Property. EMBL Summer Institute 2010 Dusty Gwinn WVURC

Priority Claims, Incorporation By Reference, and how to fix errors, big and small. March 9, Jack G. Abid. Orlando, Florida

Patent Law of the Republic of Kazakhstan

Part I - PPH using the national work products from the SIPO

Transcription:

USPTO Programs for Expediting Patent Prosecution: Accelerated Exam, Patent Prosecution Highway, Green Technology Susan Perng Pan November 2010

Accelerated Examination Available in non-reissue non-provisional applications filed August 25, 2006 or after Final disposition of case within 12 months of filing Final disposition can include allowance, abandonment, filing of RCE or appeal Must agree to interview, if requested Must agree to respond to telephone restriction, if requested Must agree not to argue for separate patentability of claims if the claim rejections are appealed Must certify that a search was done of U.S. patent and patent publication databases, including fields of search and search logic; search of foreign patent databases and non-patent literature Applicant must file an Accelerated Examination Support Document (unless acceleration is based on inventor s health or age, or based on PPH)

Accelerated Examination Requirements of Examination Support Document Information Disclosure Statement For every claim, show where the features of the claim are shown in the prior art search documents, and an explanation of how claim is different from prior art Includes features disclosed but which are not presently claimed, but may be claimed at a future date Demonstrate Section 112 support in specification for each claim recitation For means-plus-function (MPF) elements, identify the element as MPF and identify the corresponding structure, acts that correspond to the MPF element Identify references which may be disqualified as prior art under common obligation of assignment provision of Section 103(c) Statement of Utility (unless application is a design patent)

Accelerated Examination Does not apply to National stage entry applications, reissues, reexaminations or plant patents Petition to make special fee applies Unless application relates to counter-terrorism, environmental quality or energy Application must be limited to 3 independent claims, 20 claims total and include no multiple dependent claims Examination on merits has 30 day reply dates, with no extensions granted as a matter of course, and replies must also include supplemented Examination Support Document for any new claims added

Patent Prosecution Highway U.S. application is a Paris Convention application with foreign priority claim to Office of First Filing (OFF), or is a national stage entry of a PCT application, or is a bypass continuation claiming benefit to a PCT application Claims stand allowed in the OFF

Patent Prosecution Highway Example 1

Patent Prosecution Highway Example 2

Patent Prosecution Highway Example 3

Patent Prosecution Highway (continued) Office of First Filing application (JP) has at least one claim that is determined to be allowable Applicant must submit a copy of the allowable/patentable claims from the JPO application along with an English translation thereof and a statement that the English translation is accurate All claims of Office of Second Filing (U.S.) application must sufficiently correspond or be amended to sufficiently correspond to the allowable/patentable claims in the OFF application, and such correspondence must be shown with PPH request

Patent Prosecution Highway (continued) Applicant must file a request for participation in the PPH program, including a Petition to Make Special No Petition Fees Required as of May 25, 2010 PPH must be filed prior to start of substantive examination in USPTO Submit OFF Office Actions with English translations Office Actions and translations are not necessary if the OFF document is a first action allowance IDS with all references cited in OFF Office Actions

Patent Prosecution Highway (continued) PPH does not impose time limits on USPTO to reach final disposition PPH generally reaches final disposition, on average, within 1.7 Office Actions while applications in the regular examination pool typically reach final disposition in 2.7 Office Actions

Green Technology Pilot Program Pilot program recently extended to December 31, 2011, or when 3000 applications are accepted into program (currently, 790 petitions have been granted) Invention contributes to Environmental quality Discovery or development of renewable energy resources More efficient utilization and conservation of energy resources Reduction of Greenhouse gas emissions Applicant must request early publication of application Applicant must agree to respond to telephone restriction, if necessary

Green Technology Pilot Program Request to participate in Green Technology Pilot must be received prior to first Office Action on merits Written Restriction/Election qualifies as a first Office Action on merits National stage applications qualify for pilot Claims cannot exceed 3 independent claims and 20 claims total, no multiple dependent claims permitted

Green Technology Pilot Program Pilot program projected to shorten pendency cycle of application by 12 months First Office Action on the merits usually provided within 49 days of acceptance of Petition to Make Special under Pilot program Many applications issue within 1 year 94 applications of 790 granted Green petitions have already been passed to issue

Distribution of Green Tech Cases by Technology Area Technology Center 1600 1700 2100 2400 2600 2800 3600 3700 Not Assigned Name of Technology Center Biotechnology and Organic Chemistry Chemical and Materials Engineering Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security Computer Networks, Multiplex Communication, Video Distribution, and Security Communications Semiconductors, Electrical and Optical Systems and Components Transportation, Construction, Electronic Commerce, Agriculture, National Security, and License & Review Mechanical Engineering, Manufacturing Products Number of Petitions 77 530 81 8 16 394 136 327 26 *http://www.uspto.gov/patents/init_events/green_report_summary20101102.pdf

Comparison of Expedited Examination Programs Accelerated Examination Patent Prosecution Highway Green Tech Pilot Time-savings USPTO must reach final disposition within one year.* Severe constraints on time to respond to Office Actions No USPTO mandated time for disposition. Avg. final disposition in 1.7 actions, as compared to 2.7 actions No USPTO mandated time for disposition. Expected pendency reduction of 12 months Service Costs Must conduct comprehensive search and provide detailed examination search document.* Moderate to High Submit charts showing similarity between allowed OFF and OSF claims. Translations required. Low- Moderate Statement of impact on environment or energy conservation. Low- Moderate Estoppel Risks Must compare claims to prior art and map claims to specification. Moderate to High Not significant Not significant *Does not apply when acceleration is due to inventor health or age

Comparison of Expedited Examination Programs Accelerated Examination Patent Prosecution Highway Green Tech Pilot Subject matter requirements Greater degree of freedom on subject matter Must have allowed claim in Office of First Filing Must comply with narrow technology areas Claim limits 3 independent/20 claims total, no multiple dependencies Must substantially conform with claims allowed in Office of First Filing 3 independent/20 claims total, no multiple dependencies Statutory Fees Yes, unless for environment, energy or counter-terrorism No No PCT eligible No OFF can be based on PCT Yes

Comparison of Expedited Examination Programs Accelerated Examination Patent Prosecution Highway Green Tech Pilot Electronic Filing Required Required Required Timing of Request At time of filing of complete application including filing fees and Declaration Effectively, before first Office Action Rejecting Claims Before First Office Action on the merits, including a Restriction. Must be before closing date of 12/31/11 or be first 3000 applications accepted Uses High commercial value inventions with short market cycle Efficient prosecution in multiple jurisdictions Support early market entry, funding

Questions? Susan Perng Pan Sughrue Mion, PLLC span@sughrue.com 202 663 7373 Thank you.